From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

THE MT VOID
01/16/26 -- Vol. 44, No. 29, Whole Number 2415

Editor: Evelyn Leeper, evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
All material is the opinion of the author and is copyrighted by
the author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
inclusion unless otherwise noted.

To subscribe or unsubscribe, send mail to
evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
The latest issue is at <http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm>.
An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at <http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm>.

Topics:
Mini Reviews, Part 03 (THALE, A HARD PROBLEM, DEAN MARTIN:
KING OF COOL, SUNDAY BEST: THE UNTOLD STORY OF ED
SULLIVAN) (film reviews by Evelyn C. Leeper)
Riddle (answer to riddle [and new riddle]
by Keith F. Lynch)
Science Fiction as a Predictor (pointer to article,
with comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
YOUR BEHAVIOR WILL BE MONITORED (comment
by Evelyn C. Leeper)
Hard Science Fiction, Soft Science Fiction, and Fantasy
(letter of comment by John Hertz)
This Week's Reading (THE PRINCESS BRIDE)
(book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

===================================================================

TOPIC: Mini Reviews, Part 03 (film reviews by Evelyn C. Leeper)

THALE (2012): THALE is a Norwegian folklore film, just as WHITE
REINDEER was a Finnish folklore film. But I suspect THALE was made
with the intent of reaching a wider audience, and in fact was sold
to fifty countries after its release. Thus is the difference
between the international film market between 1952 and 2012. The
budget sounds more like a 1952 budget, though--$10,000--less than
the cost of a new roof.

In THALE, two men who work for a company that cleans up death
scenes find a girl hiding in the basement of a cabin that is a
clean-up site, She seems unable to speak, but there are some
audiocassettes that give tantalizing hints of what has happened.
In fact, one criticism of the film is that it is too talky in
terms of explanation. The ultimate explanation seems to have some
parallels in the early evolution of the various species of the
genus Homo.

THALE's success may have inspired other Norwegian folk horror
films such as TROLL HUNTER (2010) or TROLL (2022) (not to be
confused with the 1986 American film TROLL) and its sequel, TROLL
2.

Released theatrically 05 April 2013; currently streaming on Hoopla.

Film Credits:
<https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2112287/reference>

What others are saying:
<https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/thale_2012>


A HARD PROBLEM (2021): The idea in A HARD PROBLEM is not a new
one, at least in written science fiction. And there are films with
similar ideas, though not the specific idea of he film.
Ironically, the idea has been discussed in the real world as
something that might be possible in the future.

The film raises issues of self-awareness, consciousness, and
purpose. The title refers to 'the Hard Problem of
Consciousness'--how humans (and others) have subjective
experiences (qualia). These have been in science fiction for a
long time. The difference in this film is the origin of the beings
involved, which does not really add that much.

I realize this is all very vague, but I don't want to give too
much away.

Released streaming 12 December 2023.

Film Credits:
<https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11080042/reference>

What others are saying:
<https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/a_hard_problem>


DEAN MARTIN: KING OF COOL (2021): DEAN MARTIN: KING OF COOL covers
Dean Martin's life--his entire life, not just the history of
Martin and (Jerry) Lewis, and not just the history of the "Rat
Pack", though both of those are covered.

The emphasis is on Martin as a family man, in spite of the fact
that he was divorced three times. This seemed to be more because
he loved all his children and remained close to them in spite of
this.

As for Martin & Lewis, DEAN MARTIN: KING OF COOL makes it out to
be entirely Lewis's fault. This may be true, but it is also
reasonable to apply a certain level of skepticism, as it is not
clear that the filmmakers ever got Lewis's side of the story. (One
of Lewis's children was interviewed, but never spoke about the
causes of the break-up--at least on camera.)

The famed 'reconciliation' arranged by Sinatra on the Jerry Lewis
Telethon never really lasted. However, when Martin's son died,
Lewis unobtrusively attended the funeral.

There are a couple of interesting takeaways, one favorable and one
unfavorable.

Favorable: Martin stood by his friends. The Rat Pack supported JFK
throughout his campaign, but Kennedy invited only Martin, Peter
Lawford, Frank Sinatra, and Joey Bishop to his Inauguration
Dinner. He excluded Sammy Davis, Jr., because Davis's wife was
white. Sinatra and Bishop attended anyway, but Martin refused to
go. (Ironically, up to this point JFK had been very friendly with
Sinatra, but after he was elected, he realized that Sinatra's
Mafia ties made Sinatra a liability, and he cut all ties with him.
This is shown dramatically in the narrative film THE RAT PACK.)

Unfavorable: When Martin started doing a solo act, he played a
drunk. In reality, he was not a drunk, and drank apple juice on
stage. But he made being drunk look cool.

Additional topical note:

The show features the Christmas shows with Dean Martin and Frank
Sinatra. Stephen Miller (TrumprCOs deputy chief of staff for policy
and Homeland Security advisor, as well as the man behind the
immigration agenda) recently posted, "Watched the Dean Martin and
Frank Sinatra Family Christmas with my kids. Imagine watching that
and thinking America needed infinity migrants from the third
world."

Ignoring the use of "infinity" as an adjective, Miller was soundly
roasted for his tweet.

Brian Krassenstein: "Both Dean Martin and Frank Sinatra were
children of immigrants. Dean Martin didnrCOt even begin to learn
english until he was 5. Imagine watching a show with your kids and
trying to figure out ways to use it to attack immigrants who are
in need on Christmas day."

Rolling Stone politics reporter Nikki McCann Ramirez: "Dean Martin
was born Dino Paul Crocetti and gave himself a stage name because
of braindead xenophobes like Stephen. Sinatra was also a child of
Italian immigrants. Imagine watching them and thinking immigrants
didnrCOt build the culture you fetishize today."

Bill Kristol, editor at large The Bulwark: "The parents of Frank
Sinatra and Dean Martin (b. Dino Crocetti) were immigrants from
rCythird worldrCO parts of Italy. In the U.S., various Sinatras and
Crocettis had occasional run-ins with the law. They were the kinds
of immigrants Stephen Miller would have been eager to deport."

I will just quote Jeff MacNelly (from the comic strip "Shoe"):
"You can't fix stupid."

Released theatrically 19 Nov 2021.

Film Credits:
<https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11346000/reference>

What others are saying: <https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/dean_martin_king_of_cool>


SUNDAY BEST: THE UNTOLD STORY OF ED SULLIVAN (2025): SUNDAY BEST
is not quite a biography of Ed Sullivan, and not quite a history
of THE ED SULLIVAN SHOW. It is a bit of both, but focusing on
Sullivan as an instrument of social change.

It was not just Elvis Presley and the Beatles. It was the stars
from the neighborhood where Sullivan was born--Harlem. And it was
the African-American performers from all over the world that
Sullivan booked that put black faces on the television screen when
the only black faces on television were whites in black-face.

And he did not just book them. He stood next to them, he shook
hands with them, he put his arm around them--all actions that the
network censors had told him not to do.

But one thing I noticed watching this was that every time they
panned across the audience of the show, every audience member was
white.

Released streaming 07 July 2025.

Film Credits:
<https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7264336/reference>

What others are saying:
<https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/sunday_best>


[-ecl]

===================================================================

TOPIC: Riddle (answer to riddle [and new riddle] by Keith F. Lynch)

Last week we published this riddle from Keith F. Lynch:

What do Australia, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Czechia, France,
Iceland, Laos, Liberia, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand,
North Korea, Norway, Panama, Russia, Samoa, Slovakia, Taiwan,
Thailand, Trinidad & Tobago, the United Kingdom, and the United
States have in common? [-kfl]

John Kerr-Mudd mused:

Eccentrically positioned Capitals? (hmm, not Czechia, France,
Luxembourg, Panama). Narrow little sticky-out bits? Ah, parts you
need a boat to get to some other bits of?

Ah well, I gave it a go. [-jkm]

Evelyn notes:

I suspect most countries have "narrow little sticky-out bits," and
everything not land-locked (and not having large lakes) has "parts
you need a boat to get to some other bits of." [-ecl]

Keith answers:

Thay all have red, white, and blue flags, i.e. their flags contain
all three colors and contain no other colors.

(Correction: Costa Rica's flag also contains a small amount of
green.)

Can you name any nation whose flag contains *none* of these three
colors? As far as I can tell, there's currently just one. [-kfl]

===================================================================

TOPIC: Science Fiction as a Predictor (pointer to article, with
comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

The Guardian had an article titled "Mass surveillance, the
metaverse, making America rCygreat againrCO: the novelists who
predicted our present"; the title says it all.

As a bonus it also mentions Borges in the subtitle: "From Jorge
Luis Borges to George Orwell and Margaret Atwood, novelists have
foreseen some of the major developments of our age. What can we
learn from their prophecies?":

"ItrCOs often said that BorgesrCOs story ["The Garden of Forking
Paths"] foreshadows the multiverse hypothesis in quantum
physics--first proposed by Hugh Everett in 1957, then
popularised by Bryce DeWitt in the 1970s as the rCLmany worlds
interpretationrCY of quantum mechanics."

They're wrong of course, in the sense that Murray Leinster's
"Sidewise in Time" (1934) predates "The Garden of Forking Paths"
(1941) by seven years.

At any rate, here's the article; I believe it is not paywalled:

<https://www.theguardian.com/books/2026/jan/10/ mass-surveillance-the-metaverse-making-america-great-again-the- novelists-who-predicted-our-present>

===================================================================

TOPIC: YOUR BEHAVIOR WILL BE MONITORED (comment by Evelyn
C. Leeper)

In response to Joe Karpierz's review of YOUR BEHAVIOR WILL BE
MONITORED in the 01/09/26 issue of the MT VOID, Evelyn writes:

Joe wrote:

Those readers who work or have worked in a corporate environment
will recognize situations from their own corporate life. This
makes the story relatable and (to me) funny. I've been in enough
meetings that look like those in the novel that I swear Feinstein
was sitting right next to me in them. [-jak]

This brought to mind this extract from Connie Willis's novella
'Bellwether':

"All right, fellow workers," Management said. "Do you have
your five objectives? Flip, would you collect them?"

Elaine looked stricken. Gina snatched the list from her and
wrote rapidly:
1. Optimize potential.
2. Facilitate empowerment.
3. Implement visioning.
4. Strategize priorities.
5. Augment core structures.

"How did you do that?" I said admiringly.

"Those are the five things I always write down," she said
and handed the list to Flip...

[-cw]

[-ecl]

===================================================================

TOPIC: Hard Science Fiction, Soft Science Fiction, and Fantasy
(letter of comment by John Hertz)

In response to Dale Skran's comments on why hard SF is losing its
audience in the 12/26/25 issue of the MT VOID, John Hertz writes:

Even I observed that Dale Skran's ChapGPT paragraph ion the thick
of vociferous talk about Artificial Intelligence at <File770.com>.

I'll let others discuss whether the paragraph reveals its ChatGPT
origin, whether the question was wisely (or satirically) posed to
ChatGPT, and like that.

It makes a sad and I believe mundane (if I may use that term)
assumption, that speculative fiction (in which I include science
fiction and fantasy, although Heinlein said not to) is in the
predicting, or the hoping, business; readers like it if it appears
to promote a world they want, or work against one they don't.

Setting this aside--if possible--here are some further thoughts I
propose for attention.

Are the terms "hard" and "soft" science questionable? I believe
they emerged in the 1960s from sociology--a "soft" science--and to
some extent put down "hard" science; "soft" science is welcoming,
"hard" science is harsh; then of course they were adopted
defiantly in the "hard" sciences.

Setting this aside--if possible--I too have the impression that
more "soft" science fiction than "hard" appears these days, and
more fantasy than science fiction. I don't object to fantasy; some
of it is quite good; a few authors have done both, even (if I may
use that term) Heinlein and Niven. I don't say this (if true) is
sex-related: I'd consider FRANKENSTEIN "hard" science--although
it's one of those books everybody talks about but nobody has read;
and women have done "hard" science--I recently proposed for Best
Related Work a biography of Marie Curie.

Five decades ago [James] Michener's SPACE--a novel I think we
neglect (is it science fiction? back into the can, worms!)- has
scientists more involved with art than artists with science. True?
Relevant?

I see resistance among some college students--how large a part of
the public? of the book-buying public?--to requirements that they
study outside their major interest. I've run into science students
protesting, as even worse than "soft" science, general
education--such worthless subjects as literature and philosophy.
Widespread? Contrary to SPACE? (Can fiction be contradicted? back,
worms!) Do literature and philosophy count among the arts?

Speaking as a philosophy major, and a literature lover, I confess
that all toomuch of these is, bluntly, glop. My own
profession--I'm a lawyer--is a terrible offender.

Fifteen decades ago one of the most literary and philosophical
lawyers, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., said "the life of the law has
not been logic: it has been experience." True? Relevant?

Eight decades Vladimir Nabokov, active in both literature and
"hard" science, said "this is the worst thing a reader can do, he
identifies himself with a character in the book." True? Relevant?

Today we are not invited to do things, but to experience them. Do
readers want to immerse themselves? Do more thus want fantasy than
science fiction? If so, why? Do authors think so? Publishers? Hugo
voters?

As Nabokov used to say, ponder this. [-jh]

Evelyn responds:

You seem to move back and forth between talking about "hard
science fiction" and "hard science". FRANKENSTEIN was science
fiction (and yes, I have read it, as well as Shelley's THE LAST
MAN), but Marie Curie was doing science.

As for writing both hard science fiction and fantasy, Catherine
Asaro comes to mind.

I will also note that fantasy is taking over not just speculative
fiction, but mainstream fiction. On a recent trip to the public
library, a friend and I noticed that a substantial percentage of
books filed in the "Fiction" section were actually fantasy: time
travel (with any science fiction basis), ghosts, magical realism,
etc. [-ecl]

===================================================================

TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

In the preface to THE PRINCESS BRIDE (1973, Ballantine, ISBN
0-345-25483-X), William Goldman writes, "Fact: BUTCH CASSIDY AND
THE SUNDANCE KID is, no question, the most popular thing I've ever
been connected with. When I die, if the Times gives me an obit,
it's going to be because of BUTCH."

William Goldman's most famous quote is that in Hollywood, "Nobody
knows anything."

Well, he knew half of it. Yes, his New York Times obituary started
out, "William Goldman ... won Academy Awards for his screenplays
for 'Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid' and 'All the PresidentrCOs
Men' ...

But it went on to say, "Mr. Goldman ... was a prolific novelist as
well, and several of his screenplays were adapted from his own
novels, notably 'The Princess Bride' and 'Marathon Man.'" So while
BUTCH CASSIDY AND THE SUNDANCE KID was mentioned first, THE
PRINCESS BRIDE was recognized as well.

As for the book itself (and the film), Goldman seems oddly
prescient.

Florin is celebrating its 500th anniversary. The United States is
now celebrating its 250th.

One of the villains in THE PRINCESS BRIDE has six fingers on his
right hand. A "photograph" of Trump praying in church was shown to
be AI-generated when people noticed he had six fingers on his
right hand.

Prince Humperdinck is generating false narratives and false
evidence to start a war with Guilder. Trump said Venezuela was
about drugs (Venezuela is not a major supplier of drugs to the
US), and then about regime change (though he left in place
everyone else in Maduro's regime). So far as anyone can tell, it
was about oil. (This is not the only current example.)

I'm still torn between "warthog-faced baboon" and "miserable,
vomitous mass".

In THE TOTALLY GEEKY GUIDE TO 'THE PRINCESS BRIDE' (Lulu.com, ISBN 978-1-847-28739-7), MaryAnn Johanson writes, "When, for example,
Princess Buttercup is in great danger, seemingly, of being eaten
by the Shrieking Eels, the logical part of our moviegoing brains
knows that she'll be fine, she will be safe--she has to be safe,
because she is a major character in this story, and her story has
not yet resolved itself in any way that satisfies what we
unconsciously understand are the demands of storytelling; she must
be reunited with Westley, her true love, or she must fail to be
reunited with him through some action or fault of her own..."

I have seen this argument put forward by other critics about other
movies: we fear for the heroine, but we also know she will survive
whatever peril there is, because she is the heroine.

I have just one question for these critics: have they never seen
PSYCHO? [-ecl]

===================================================================

Evelyn C. Leeper
evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com


Fanaticism consists of redoubling your efforts when you
have forgotten your aim.
--George Santayana

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2