• MT VOID, 05/29/26 -- Vol. 44, No. 48, Whole Number 2434

    From Evelyn C. Leeper@evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Sun May 31 08:23:21 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    THE MT VOID
    05/29/26 -- Vol. 44, No. 48, Whole Number 2434

    Editor: Evelyn Leeper, evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
    All material is the opinion of the author and is copyrighted by
    the author unless otherwise noted.
    All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
    inclusion unless otherwise noted.

    To subscribe or unsubscribe, send mail to
    evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
    The latest issue is at <http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm>.
    An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at <http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm>.

    Topics:
    Middletown (NJ) Public Library Science Fiction Discussion
    Group
    Picks for Turner Classic Movies in June (comments
    by Evelyn C. Leeper)
    Nicholas Cage and Quatermass (comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
    This Week's Reading (JUSTINIAN'S FLEA, PUBLIC SPECTACLES
    IN ROMAN AND LATE ANTIQUE PALESTINE) (book comments
    by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Middletown (NJ) Public Library Science Fiction Discussion
    Group

    June 4, 2026: THE MARTIAN CHRONICLES (1980 TV Parts 2 & 3)
    & book by Ray Bradbury
    <https://archive.org/details/bwb_O8-CZL-512/page/n5/mode/2up>

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Picks for Turner Classic Movies in June (comments by Evelyn
    C. Leeper)

    Once again, I have only three quarters of June's listings. Still,
    I'll go with recommending a double feature of two excellent
    mainstream films with Bob Hoskins, THE LONG GOOD FRIDAY and MONA
    LISA, both set in the London criminal world. (You may want to turn
    on the subtitles; when Hoskins was once asked why his films
    weren't subtitled for American audiences, he responded that he
    would have them subtitled when Marlon Brando's films were
    subtitled in the UK. This was well before DVDs made subtitling de
    rigueur for home video.)

    Warning: the violence in THE LONG GOOD FRIDAY is described in the
    IMDb "Parents Guide" as "Severe". MONA LISA is less violent, but
    still not for the kiddies.

    THE LONG GOOD FRIDAY (1980), Saturday, June 6, 1:30 AM
    MONA LISA (1986), Saturday, June 6, 3:30 AM

    There's also a Steven Spielberg "festival" Tuesday, June 9 through
    Wednesday, June 10, about which nothing more needs to be said:

    CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE THIRD KIND (1977), Tuesday, June 9, 8:00 PM
    A.I. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (2001), Tuesday, June 9, 10:30 PM
    MINORITY REPORT (2002), Wednesday, June 10, 1:15 AM
    POLTERGEIST (1982), Wednesday, June 10, 4:00 AM

    Other films of interest (through June 22):

    TUESDAY, June 2
    6:00 AM Moby Dick (1930)
    7:30 AM Around the World in 80 Days (1956)
    12:45 PM Jungle Book (1942)
    4:15 PM The Time Machine (1960)
    6:00 PM She (1965)
    12:15 AM Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978)
    2:30 AM The Thing from Another World (1951)
    4:00 AM Grey Gardens (1976)

    WEDNESDAY, June 3
    8:00 AM Camelot (1967)

    SATURDAY, June 6
    1:30 AM The Long Good Friday (1980)
    3:30 AM Mona Lisa (1986)
    10:00 AM Tarzan and the Valley of Gold (1966)

    SUNDAY, June 7
    4:00 PM Blithe Spirit (1945)

    MONDAY, June 8
    2:15 AM Black Moon (1975)

    TUESDAY, June 9
    3:15 AM It Happened Tomorrow (1944)
    8:00 PM Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977)
    10:30 PM A.I. Artificial Intelligence (2001)

    WEDNESDAY, June 10
    1:15 AM Minority Report (2002)
    4:00 AM Poltergeist (1982)

    WEDNESDAY, June 10
    4:00 PM Arsenic and Old Lace (1944)

    THURSDAY, June 11
    8:00 PM Do the Right Thing (1989)

    FRIDAY, June 12
    7:00 AM Turnabout (1940)
    8:30 AM Beyond Tomorrow (1940)
    10:00 AM The Devil and Daniel Webster (1941)
    12:00 PM The Horn Blows at Midnight (1945)
    1:30 PM I Married an Angel (1942)
    3:00 PM Topper Returns (1941)
    4:30 PM The Canterville Ghost (1944)
    6:15 PM The Rocking Horse Winner (1949)

    SATURDAY, June 13
    12:00 AM Nightmare Alley (1947)
    10:00 AM Tarzan and the Great River (1967)
    2:00 PM House of Wax (1953)
    6:15 PM Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid (1982)

    THURSDAY, June 18
    1:30 AM Crack in the World (1965)
    3:15 AM Meteor (1979)
    5:15 AM The Swarm (1978)
    9:15 AM King Kong (1933)
    11:15 AM Two on a Guillotine (1965)
    1:15 PM The Hypnotic Eye (1960)
    2:45 PM Spider Baby (1964)
    9:30 PM The Phantom of the Opera (1925)

    FRIDAY, June 19
    6:00 AM The Lodger (1927)
    7:45 AM Young and Innocent (1937)
    9:15 AM The Wrong Man (1956)
    11:15 AM The Lady Vanishes (1938)
    1:00 PM North by Northwest (1959)
    5:45 PM Suspicion (1941)

    SATURDAY, June 20
    5:15 AM The World, the Flesh and the Devil (1959)
    10:00 AM Tarzan and the Jungle Boy (1968)
    8:00 PM Rear Window (1954)

    MONDAY, June 22
    12:00 PM The Valley of Gwangi (1969)
    2:00 PM Tarzan and the Valley of Gold (1966)

    WEDNESDAY, June 24
    8:00 PM The Andromeda Strain (1971)
    10:15 PM On the Beach (1959)

    THURSDAY, June 25
    12:45 AM The Omega Man (1971)
    2:30 AM The World, the Flesh and the Devil (1959)
    4:15 AM Night of the Living Dead (1968)
    6:00 AM Gojira (1954)

    FRIDAY, June 26
    12:30 AM Christine (1983)
    6:45 AM M (1931)
    10:15 AM Mad Love (1935)
    6:15 PM The Beast with Five Fingers (1946)

    [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Nicholas Cage and Quatermass (comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    A recent interview with the New York Times has the following
    exchange between the interviewer and Nicholas Cage:

    Interviewer: This is slightly related: I read a Reddit "Ask Me
    Anything" you did a couple years back, and the subject of praying
    mantises came up, and you said, "Don't get me started on the
    praying mantis." Why not?

    Cage: Those aliens in the horror movie "Quatermass and the Pit"
    looked like praying mantises and it flipped me out.

    <https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/23/magazine/
    nicolas-cage-interview.html>

    [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    JUSTINIAN'S FLEA: PLAGUE, EMPIRE, AND THE RISE OF EUROPE by
    William Rosen (Penguin, ISBN 978-0-670-03855-8) is easy to read,
    but annoying in two ways.

    The first is that though the title seems to suggest the book is
    about Justinian's Plague, but the first half of the book is about
    the rise of Justinian, with a lot of detail about Belisarius's
    defeat of the Persians at Dara, the building of the third version
    of Hagia Sophia, and so on. Okay, this is still entertaining and
    illuminating as background.

    Then there is a long section talking about the bacterium that
    caused the Plague, Yersinia pestis, and Rosen goes into great
    detail about how it is spread, what the environmental conditions
    need to be, why it didn't spread eastward along the Silk Road to
    China (which had its own version in the 19th century), and so on.

    He mentions a lot of theories about the geographical origin of Y.
    pestis, including one by Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe
    which "posits an extraterrestrial birthplace for the plague, whose
    periodicity is best explained by such activities as sunspots." The
    theory claims the bacterium was brought to Earth on comets.

    More annoying are sloppy errors. The first was on page 3, when
    Rosen refers to "[sending] a satellite to the moons of Saturn."
    No, we might send a probe, a rocket, a spaceship, a beacon, ...
    but a satellite is something that orbits another body, not
    something that goes from point A to point B.

    On page 80, he says Dara is less than ten miles from Nisibis. This
    is true, but the map on page 17 has them as far apart as it has
    Milan and Naples, which is 450 miles.

    On page 82, he writes how the most deadly weapon the Romans had
    was "the compound bow that was the great contribution of the
    steppe peoples to missile weaponry." Wrong! He means the
    *composite* bow. The compound bow has pulleys and cables and
    wasn't invented until 1966.

    On page 126, Rosen say "mastery of Roman law had come to be
    synonymous with mastery of the complications of the Latin
    language--classical Latin regularly used six different cases in
    the declension of nouns and adjectives: ablative, accusative,
    dative genitive, nominative, and vocative. ... Simplifying the
    practice of law so that its syntax and grammar were driven by
    logic rather than arbitrary rhetorical conventions was clearly an
    advance."

    But the classical Latin language *was* driven by logic. English
    has declensions as well, though only three cases, and applied only
    to pronouns. "I" is subjective, "me" is objective, and "my" is
    possessive. Should we get rid of two of them and say something
    like, "Me want you to give me me book"? Modern Russian, like
    Latin, has six cases; Finnish has fifteen. Yet little children
    speak these languages, and their law codes don't see to suffer
    from the apparent complexity.

    So when he mentions three different strains of Y. pestis (one that
    caused the sixth-century Plague of Justinian, one that caused the fourteenth-century Black Death, and one that caused the
    nineteenth-century plague in China), I did double-check whether
    this was accurate. It was.

    At the end of the book, after detailing the effects of Justinian's
    Plague, Rosen drifts into a bit of alternate history:

    "One way to evaluate the significance of the sixth-century
    plague--to weight Justinian's flea--is to examine any subsequent
    century, asking whether it most prominent events would have
    occurred at all, or in the same form, in the absence of the
    pandemic. Consider the following:

    "Muhammed, for example, would still have received his revelation
    even if Y. pestis had never emerged out of Africa, but would
    Persia and Rome have succumbed so easily had they not lost tens of
    millions to the bacterium? ... And, even if the armies of Islam
    would have defeated the two great empires of antiquity anyway,
    would the Franks have become the preeminent power of the ninth
    century without Charlemagne's acquisition of the title of Holy
    Roman Emperor? The imperial crown was, after all, granted by a
    pope who wanted Frankish protection from the Lombards, since he
    could no longer count on a plague-weakened empire to defend Italy."

    And so on.

    PUBLIC SPECTACLES IN ROMAN AND LATE ANTIQUE PALESTINE by Zeev
    Weiss (Harvard, ISBN 978-0-674-04831-7), on the other hand, is not
    easy to read. Not only is there a lot of detail, complete with
    measurements and terms in Latin, Greek, and other languages for
    all the architectural details, ceremonies, and officials
    (translated only on first use, if that, and no glossary). Weiss
    also repeats stories four or five times--his explanation of why
    Jews might be allowed to attend gladiatorial competitions, for
    example (and not just refers to them, but repeats the entire
    explanation).

    It also has 239 pages of text, and 100 pages of notes. The notes
    are both bibliographic references and explanatory notes, mixed
    together. This is annoying--I generally want to read explanatory
    notes (so they should be footnotes) but not the bibliographic
    references (which are fine at the back of the book). [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    Evelyn C. Leeper
    evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com


    Our life is frittered away by detail.
    Simplicity, simplicity, simplicity!
    --Henry David Thoreau
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From prd@prd@pauldormer.cix.co.uk (Paul Dormer) to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Mon Jun 1 10:47:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    In article <10vh982$1h8rq$1@dont-email.me>,
    evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com (Evelyn C. Leeper) wrote:


    Cage: Those aliens in the horror movie "Quatermass and the Pit"
    looked like praying mantises and it flipped me out.

    Quatermass and the Pit was originally a TV series on the BBC in the
    fifties. My mother said she watched alone whilst my father was out and
    me and my sisters were in bed. Scared her, too.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From kludge@kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Mon Jun 1 17:33:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    Paul Dormer <prd@pauldormer.cix.co.uk> wrote:
    evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com (Evelyn C. Leeper) wrote:


    Cage: Those aliens in the horror movie "Quatermass and the Pit"
    looked like praying mantises and it flipped me out.

    Quatermass and the Pit was originally a TV series on the BBC in the
    fifties. My mother said she watched alone whilst my father was out and
    me and my sisters were in bed. Scared her, too.

    Most of those shows are now lost but there are three or four that were preserved. They are very different than the movie due to the constraints
    of live TV, and they are interesting in themselves.
    --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Evelyn C. Leeper@evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Mon Jun 1 18:55:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    On 6/1/26 17:33, Scott Dorsey wrote:
    Paul Dormer <prd@pauldormer.cix.co.uk> wrote:
    evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com (Evelyn C. Leeper) wrote:


    Cage: Those aliens in the horror movie "Quatermass and the Pit"
    looked like praying mantises and it flipped me out.

    Quatermass and the Pit was originally a TV series on the BBC in the
    fifties. My mother said she watched alone whilst my father was out and
    me and my sisters were in bed. Scared her, too.

    Most of those shows are now lost but there are three or four that were preserved. They are very different than the movie due to the constraints
    of live TV, and they are interesting in themselves.
    --scott


    The TV series "Quatermass II" and "Quatermass and the Pit" exist in
    complete form (all six episodes each). (I know, because I have them.)
    mOf "The Quatermass Experiment" I believe only Chapter 2 remains.
    --
    Evelyn C. Leeper, http://leepers.us/evelyn
    Super Callous Fragile Racist Sexist Lying POTUS -anonymous sign
    86 47 II/4 25
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From prd@prd@pauldormer.cix.co.uk (Paul Dormer) to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Tue Jun 2 15:54:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    In article <10vl2l2$2bk1q$1@dont-email.me>,
    evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com (Evelyn C. Leeper) wrote:


    The TV series "Quatermass II" and "Quatermass and the Pit" exist in
    complete form (all six episodes each). (I know, because I have them.)
    mOf "The Quatermass Experiment" I believe only Chapter 2 remains.

    Quatermass and the Pit was shown, I recall, at the UK Worldcon in 1979.

    I note that the first two films have been shown on Talking Pictures TV in
    the last couple of weeks.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2