• MT VOID, 04/24/26 -- Vol. 44, No. 43, Whole Number 2429

    From Evelyn C. Leeper@evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Sun Apr 26 09:13:45 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    THE MT VOID
    04/24/26 -- Vol. 44, No. 43, Whole Number 2429

    Editor: Evelyn Leeper, evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
    All material is the opinion of the author and is copyrighted by
    the author unless otherwise noted.
    All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
    inclusion unless otherwise noted.

    To subscribe or unsubscribe, send mail to
    evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com
    The latest issue is at <http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm>.
    An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at <http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm>.

    Topics:
    Middletown (NJ) Public Library Science Fiction Discussion
    Group
    Picks for Turner Classic Movies in May (comments
    by Evelyn C. Leeper)
    Roger Corman, THE BEAST WITH A MILLION EYES, PIRANHA,
    PIRANHA 3D, and MEGA PIRANHA (film comments
    by Evelyn C. Leeper)
    THE SUBJECTS (letter of comment by Scott Dorsey)
    Clu Gulager (letter of comment by Peter Rubinstein)
    THERE IS NO ANTIMEMETIC DIVISION (letter of comment
    by Paul S. R. Chisholm)
    OUTLAND, CAST A DEADLY SPELL, and THE HIDDEN (letter
    of comment by Steve Coltrin)
    This Week's Reading (BROTHERHOOD OF THE REVOLUTION
    and PHYSICS IN YOUR LIFE) (course comments
    by Evelyn C. Leeper)
    Hugo Award Finalists

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Middletown (NJ) Public Library Science Fiction Discussion
    Group

    May 7, 2026: YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN (1974) & "Frankenstein"
    by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley
    <https://www.hoopladigital.com/search?q=frankenstein>
    <https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/84>
    OR: "Young Frankenstein: The Story of the Making of the Film" by
    Mel Brooks, with Rebecca Keegan:
    <https://www.hoopladigital.com/ebook/ young-frankenstein-a-mel-brooks-book-mel-brooks/13769145>

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Picks for Turner Classic Movies in May (comments by Evelyn
    C. Leeper)

    As I mentioned last month, it's getting harder to do this, because
    Turner isn't posting its upcoming films as early in the previous
    month as they used to. And this month it's the worst, because this
    goes out a full week before the new month starts. So the listings
    I could access went up only through May 21.]

    I'm going to recommend two films this month. The first is CROSSING
    DELANCEY, which I recommended a few months ago. (At the time I
    said it was "woefully understated"; what I meant was "woefully under-appreciated".) This is a rom-com set where the uptown
    literary world and the downtown modern Orthodox world meet, with a
    great performance by Reizl Bozyk, and I'll recommended it again.

    CROSSING DELANCEY (1988), Sunday, May 3, 2:00 AM

    SOUTH PACIFIC needs to be watched almost as an artifact. Someone
    on Usenet talked about watching SOUTH PACIFIC when she was a
    teenager in the 1980s and not understanding what everyone in the
    film was getting so agitated about--eventually she twigged to it
    being that the European Emile de Becque had married a Polynesian,
    and his children were therefore mixed-race. At the time the
    musical was first written (1927), this was shocking, and even at
    the time of the movie (1958) it was at least somewhat disapproved
    of by many. Nowadays, it can be understood only as a period
    piece, similar to GUESS WHO'S COMING TO DINNER or SHOW BOAT. (Yes,
    I understand there are still those who feel that way, but the
    general attitude is very different now from a hundred years ago.)

    SOUTH PACIFIC (1958), Sunday, May 17, 5:15 PM

    Other films of interest:

    FRIDAY, May 1
    10:15 PM Spellbound (1945)

    SATURDAY, May 2
    6:45 AM Miracles for Sale (1939)
    8:15 AM Mark of the Vampire (1935)
    10:00 AM Tarzan, the Ape Man (1959)
    4:30 PM Oh, God! (1977)

    SUNDAY, May 3
    6:00 AM Hercules, Samson & Ulysses (1963)
    7:45 AM Helen of Troy (1956)

    MONDAY, May 4
    6:00 AM Queen of Outer Space (1958)
    7:30 AM Satellite in the Sky (1956)
    9:00 AM The Black Scorpion (1957)
    10:30 AM The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms (1953)
    12:00 PM Forbidden Planet (1956)
    1:45 PM The Invisible Boy (1957)
    3:15 PM The Killer Shrews (1959)
    4:30 PM Them! (1954)
    6:30 PM Invaders from Mars (1953)

    TUESDAY, May 5
    6:00 AM Haxan: Witchcraft Through the Ages (1922)
    8:00 AM White Zombie (1932)
    10:30 AM From Beyond the Grave (1973)
    12:15 PM Night of Dark Shadows (1971)
    2:00 PM Dracula A.D. 1972 (1972)
    3:45 PM Eye of the Devil (1966)
    5:30 PM I Walked with a Zombie (1943)
    6:45 PM The Seventh Victim (1943)

    FRIDAY, May 8
    6:45 AM The Devil-Doll (1936)
    8:15 AM Doctor X (1932)
    9:45 AM The Walking Dead (1936)
    11:00 AM Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1932)
    2:30 PM Things to Come (1936)
    4:15 PM Transatlantic Tunnel (1935)

    SATURDAY, May 9
    10:00 AM Tarzan the Magnificent (1960)

    MONDAY, May 11
    8:00 PM All of Me (1984)

    WEDNESDAY, May 13
    8:00 PM Ed Wood (1994)

    SATURDAY, May 16
    10:00 AM Tarzan Goes to India (1962)
    3:30 PM The Crimson Pirate (1952)

    SUNDAY, May 17
    6:30 AM Forbidden Planet (1956)

    MONDAY, May 18
    11:30 PM Pennies from Heaven (1981)

    THURSDAY, May 21
    7:15 AM One Million B.C. (1940)

    [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Roger Corman, PIRANHA, PIRNHA 3D, and MEGA PIRANHA (film
    comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    This started as a review of ROGER CORMAN: THE POPE OF POP CINEMA
    (2021), a documentary about Roger Corman, but it turned into more
    than just that.

    Let me start by saying that Roger Corman didn't make great films,
    but Roger Corman made great filmmakers.

    This is not to say that his films aren't enjoyable, but he didn't
    make films like THE GODFATHER, or TAXI DRIVER, or APOLLO 13, or
    THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS, or TITANIC. Those were done by Francis
    Ford Coppola, and Martin Scorsese, and Ron Howard, and Jonathan
    Demme, and James Cameron--all of whom got their start as directors
    under Roger Corman.

    If you want to see their directorial debuts under Corman, these
    are DEMENTIA 13 (Francis Ford Coppola), BOXCAR BERTHA (Martin
    Scorsese), GRAND THEFT AUTO (Ron Howard), CAGED HEAT (Jonathan
    Demme), and PIRANHA II (James Cameron).

    Not to mention John Sayles, Jack Nicholson, Bruce Dern, Gale Ann
    Hurd, Robert Towne, and Talia Shire, who got starts as writers,
    actors, and producers.

    And Ron Howard relates what Corman told them (or at least him):
    "If you do a good job you'll never have to work for me again."

    One well-known director (I cannot recall which one) noted that a
    big difference in a Corman set and a Hollywood studio set of the
    time was that on a Hollywood studio set you might see two or three
    women working "behind the camera" (as crew or staff rather than as
    actors). On a Corman set it was closer to half-and-half (although
    the crew was much smaller than a Hollywood studio film would have.

    (I'm not sure that's entirely accurate. Some study seemed to show
    that when presented with a large group of people, an observer
    tended to see their "group"--men, whites, short people, etc.--as
    being a smaller percentage than they actually were. This was true
    the one time I tested it. Someone (male) at a computer conference
    said that about half the attendees were women. I went back and
    counted through the list of attendees; if I recall correctly, it
    was closer to a third, or perhaps less. Well, it was thirty years
    ago; my memory isn't perfect.)

    Anyway, back to Corman. The stories of how he made such films as
    THE LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS (shot in two days with sets left over
    from A BUCKET OF BLOOD), DEMENTIA 13 (shot using cast and sets
    left over from THE YOUNG RACERS), TARGETS (using stock footage
    from THE TERROR and two days of shooting with Boris Karloff, who
    owed Corman another two days on his contract from THE TERROR), and
    HOLLYWOOD BOULEVARD (which used footage from many previous Corman
    films) are both amusing and enlightening. (Robert Rodriguez didn't
    work with Corman, but his "10-Minute Film School" extras on his
    DVDs give an idea of how Corman worked.)

    If you get the impression that Corman believed in "Use it up, wear
    it out, make it do, or do without," you're on the money. One of
    the jokes in an episode of "Mystery Science 3000" for a Roger
    Corman was that the fur piece on one of the actresses was Corman's
    poodle that had died: "He re-uses everything!" But it was to a
    great extent true. When mark and I were first in California, we
    went over the Christmas holidays to a Roger Corman/Edgar Allan Poe
    quintuple feature in an old San Jose theater. I can't recall
    exactly the films; they were five of the non-anthology Poe films
    (HOUSE OF USHER, THE PIT AND THE PENDULUM, THE PREMATURE BURIAL,
    THE RAVEN, THE HAUNTED PALACE, THE MASQUE OF THE RED DEATH, and
    THE TOMB OF LIGEIA). At any rate two things stick out. First, at
    least four of them had the same wine glasses and wall
    sconces--hence why I say Corman did re-use everything. And second,
    in between the films they played Jose Feliciano singing "Feliz
    Navidad" over the speakers. That song is indelibly linked with
    Corman-Poe films in my mind.

    (One of the IMDb's trivia points for THE LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS
    was: "Howard R. Cohen learned from Charles B. Griffith that when
    the film was being edited, 'there was a point where two scenes
    would not cut together. It was just a visual jolt, and it didn't
    work. And they needed something to bridge that moment. They found,
    in the editing room, a nice shot of the moon, they cut it in, and
    it worked. Twenty years go by. I'm at the studio one day. Chuck
    comes running up to me and says, "You've got to see this!" It was
    a magazine article--eight pages on the symbolism of the moon in
    THE LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS.")

    Corman's films were also successful; THE WILD ANGELS made $23,000
    in one day at one drive-in, breaking all records there, even of
    major Hollywood films. THE LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS became a stage
    musical and was later re-made. Corman also made money from selling
    THE FAST AND THE FURIOUS and DEATH RACE 2000 names to what became
    successful franchises. And Vincent Canby of the New York Times
    said in his review of JAWS, "What is JAWS but a big-budget Roger
    Corman film?" Alas, Corman didn't make any money off that one, but
    he did make a low-budget rip-off, PIRANHA, which had a sequel and
    a remake, which in turn had two more sequels. See my comments
    below.

    ROGER CORMAN: THE POPE OF POP CINEMA is highly recommended, as is
    Corman's memoir HOW I MADE 100 MOVIES AND NEVER LOST A DIME,
    although in the documentary he does admit to losing money on THE
    INTRUDER, a 1962 film about race relations shot in southeastern
    Mississippi. The crew had been getting death threats and the last
    scene, a KKK rally, was shot at night after the crew had checked
    out of the motel and loaded everything on their cars and trucks.
    As soon as they finished shooting, they jumped in the cars, and
    drove straight through to St. Louis without stopping. What Corman
    didn't mention was who the star was: William Shatner.

    Released in France 19 January 2021.

    Film Credits:
    <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt14046398/reference>


    THE BEAST WITH A MILLION EYES (1955): THE BEAST WITH A MILLION
    EYES has a great credit sequence artwork and fantastic music. So
    far as I can tell from various sites, Paul Julian did the artwork,
    but was uncredited. The music was by Shostakovich, Prokofiev,
    Verdi, Wagner, and other notables, and is far too high quality,
    not to say too over-dramatic, for this film. The art direction was
    by Albert S. Ruddy, who went on to win two Academy Awards (for
    producing THE GODFATHER and MILLION DOLLAR BABY). There's a lot of
    voice-over, and of dialogue from off-screen characters or those
    facing away from the screen.

    What's the explanation?

    Corman had a contract to do four films for $100,000 each, but by
    the time he got to THE BEAST WITH A MILLION EYES, he had only
    $29,000 left. So the music was all public domain record library
    cues of classical music. The film was shot non-union. This was
    Ruddy's only film as art director. The dialogue was done in such a
    way that for a lot of the post-production looping, they didn't
    have to worry about matching the lips.

    It gets a 3.8/10 in the IMDb, which puts it ahead of MEGA PIRANHA
    (see below).

    Released theatrically 15 June 1955.

    Film Credits:
    <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048991/reference>

    What others are saying: <https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_beast_with_a_million_eyes>


    And then I watched PIRANHA (1978) twice, once with commentary,
    PIRANHA (2010) twice, again once with commentary, and MEGA PIRANHA
    (2010). PIRANHA (2010) was originally called PIRANHA 3D, was shot
    in 3D, and was a reboot of PIRANHA (1978), while MEGA PIRANHA
    (2010) was an Asylum film. For those unfamiliar with Asylum Films,
    they are an independent studio who makes low-budget "mockbusters"
    that copy major studio releases, and beat them to the theaters.
    MEGA PIRANHA was released four months before PIRANHA (2010). Other
    examples are in 2005 when Steven Spielberg released his version of
    WAR OF THE WORLDS, they released H. G. WELLS' WAR OF THE WORLDS,
    and they also did SNAKES ON A TRAIN and THE DA VINCI TREASURE in
    the appropriate years.

    (The DVD release of PIRANHA 3D was not in 3D, and was labeled just
    "PIRANHA" on the case, the physical DVD, and the film itself.)

    Anyway, Corman's 1978 PIRANHA was a lot of fun, along with being
    very gory--although the gore was tempered by the low budget, so it
    was mostly red bubbly water, or rather fuzzy shots of carnage. The
    2010 authorized remake took itself more seriously and had a bigger
    budget, so the gore was more graphic, but the humor just wasn't
    there. Instead there were a lot of mammary glands and buttocks in
    motion to fill the time. (And I'm sure in 3D they were
    impressive.) It was the first to postulate a giant piranha. MEGA
    PIRANHA picked up on this idea and ran (or swam) with it. As an
    example of their production values, the geographic coordinates one
    character gives for the piranha in Venezuela actually point to
    Quebec. And as evidence of the quality of the film, it gets a
    2.4/10 in the IMDb.

    My recommendation is to watch the Corman classic and skip the
    remakes, sequels, and rip-offs.

    PIRANHA (1978):

    Released theatrically 03 August 1978.

    Film Credits:
    <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0078087/reference>


    PIRANHA 3D (2010):

    Released theatrically 20 August 2010.

    Film Credits:
    <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0464154/reference>

    What others are saying:
    <https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/piranha_3d>

    MEGA PIRANHA (2011):

    Released theatrically 10 April 2010.

    Film Credits:
    <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1587807/reference>

    What others are saying:
    <https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/mega_piranha>


    [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: THE SUBJECTS (letter of comment by Scott Dorsey)

    In response to Dale Skran's review of THE SUBJECTS in the 04/17/26
    issue of the MT VOID, Scott Dorsey writes:

    I think the Grateful Dead did this back before Pigpen died. There
    is definitely prior experience with this. (Pigpen definitely
    developed a super-power, that of Hammond playing.) [-sd]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Clu Gulager (letter of comment by Peter Rubinstein)

    In response to Evelyn's comments on THE HIDDEN in the 04/17/26
    issue of the MT VOID, Peter Rubinstein writes:

    [Evelyn wrote,] "THE HIDDEN (1987): THE HIDDEN stars Kyle
    McLaughlin (after DUNE and BLUE VELVET, but before TWIN PEAKS),
    Claudia Christian (pre-BABYLON 5), and Clu Gallagher (whose career
    spanned a third of a century before and a third of a century after
    THE HIDDEN)." [-ecl]

    I think your spell corrector must have switched out Clu Gulager.
    [-pr]

    Evelyn responds:

    Or it could be that I just assumed his last name was the most
    common spelling. I have switched off auto-correct everywhere I
    could find it--it creates more problems than it solves. I do use
    the "auto-correct lite" (hover over the word and see what it
    thinks is the right spelling). [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: THERE IS NO ANTIMEMETIC DIVISION (letter of comment by Paul
    S. R. Chisholm)

    In response to Evelyn's comments on THERE IS NO ANTIMEMETIC
    DIVISION in the 04/17/26 issue of the MT VOID, Paul S. R. Chisholm
    writes:

    The YouTube video Evelyn linked to was uploaded on 2026-02-02.
    (Groundhog Day! See also the Harold Ramis movie of the same name.)
    The video credits the short story "We Need To Talk About
    Fifty-Five" on the SCP Foundation website:

    <https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/we-need-to-talk-about-fifty-five>

    and covers Part I, Chapter 1 of the book.

    qntm, the book's author, uploaded the original version of that
    short story on 2015-01-30.

    A video uploaded to YouTube on 2024-03-27:

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-IiVeGAydE>

    has the same title and a subtitle of "Ep 1 - SCP Horror Short
    Series." It's a combination of Chapters 1 and 2 of the book's Part
    I.

    FYI, I thought the book's first chapter was the tightest writing
    in the whole novel. [-psrc]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: OUTLAND, CAST A DEADLY SPELL, and THE HIDDEN (letter of
    comment by Steve Coltrin)

    In response to Evelyn's comments on various films in the 04/17/26
    issue of the MT VOID, Steve Coltrin writes:

    [Evelyn writes,] "OUTLAND (1981): Sometimes you just watch to
    watch a trashy science fiction movie" [-ecl]

    [snip much, including well-warranted criticisms]

    What I like best about OUTLAND is the look and feel, and if I had
    to give a one-liner of my personal L&F of the TRAVELLER setting,
    it would be "like OUTLAND and ALIEN, except the lights work and
    it's not *all* carnivorous monsters and drug dealers". [-sc]

    [Evelyn writes,] "(Later on, it turns out that the one year on Io
    is apparently in addition to one year deep sleep each way...)"
    [-ecl]

    One-year transit is interesting: much less than a Hohmann orbit
    from Earth to Jupiter (assuming we're talking about transit from
    Earth, but Mars isn't much different), much more than some kind of
    magic torch drive. So, something like ion propulsion? [-sc]

    (And at this point I have thought *far* more about this than the
    movie did.) [-sc]

    [Evelyn writes,] "CAST A DEADLY SPELL (1991) ... has Fred Ward,
    who is always good." [-ecl]

    And Clancy Brown, who is also always good.

    CAST A DEADLY SPELL is available on HBO Plus/Prime/Max/whatever
    it's called this week, for those who subscribe. I keep
    contemplating a rewatch.

    [Evelyn writes,] "The only problem is what to watch following
    this." [-ecl]

    Perhaps A DARK SONG, a 2016 Irish-British indie fantasy horror
    fairly faithfully based on the ritual in THE BOOK OF ABRAMELIN.

    (Mini-review: Don't attempt the Abramelin ritual. Seriously,
    don't.) [-sc]

    [Evelyn writes,] "THE HIDDEN" [-ecl]

    Has been on my list for literally decades. Someday I'll plunk down
    the few bucks to rent it. [-sc]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)

    BROTHERHOOD OF THE REVOLUTION by Prof. Joseph Ellis is not a Great Courses/Teaching Company course, but rather a course from Modern
    Scholar, a similar company. For whatever reason, all the GC/TTC
    courses (at least until very recently) had the number of lectures
    a multiple of six. All the MS courses I've seen have fourteen
    lectures each. Both GC/TTC and MS have booklets as well.

    This is a really good course, which I'mm saying up front, because
    I have a few nitpicks. Most of them have to do with Ellis
    misspeaking, for example saying that Washington rushed to New York
    to join the committee on independence when he meant Philadelphia.
    Or that the American Revolution was the second oldest American
    war, when he means the second longest (since he then says that
    Vietnam was the longest). Or that he talks about the yellow light
    in THE GREAT GATSBY when the light was actually green.

    All the lectures are good, but the one about the Declaration of
    Independence is spectacular in its detailed explanation of the
    timeline, and its analysis of where some of the phrasing came from
    and what they actually meant, and several of the subsequent ones
    about the Constitution and about slavery are also excellent.

    Ellis has definite opinions, and one is that Washington's most
    important strategic decision was to insist that the Continental
    Army be inoculated against smallpox in 1777.

    (Ellis is probably best known for the Pulitzer-Prize-winning book,
    FOUNDING BROTHERS.)

    PHYSICS IN YOUR LIFE (with Richard Wolfson) is a Great
    Courses/Teaching Company course that is interesting in content,
    but annoying in presentation, at least at the beginning. Wolfson
    looks at the camera less than half the time; the rest of the time
    he is looking down at his notes, presumably for some sort of
    reminder of what to say. (He looks at the camera for long enough
    periods that he is not just reading off the papers.) After a few
    lectures he starts doing demonstrations, and for those he is more
    engaged with the audience. [-ecl]

    ===================================================================

    TOPIC: Hugo Award Finalists

    [This has been converted to ASCII and diacritical marks have been
    dropped, and the letters not in the English alphabet have been
    rendered (incorrectly) as letters that are in the English
    alphabet.

    I have also stripped some of the credits for various works,
    especially when, such as in the Semi-Prozine category, they would
    be close to ten lines long. I dread the day when someone decides
    that Dramatic Presentations must list every single person involved
    in their creation and production.

    If you want a version with all the correct diacritical marks and
    letters, and the entire list of people involved in the various
    finalists, it is at <https://www.lacon.org/hugofinalists/>.]

    2026 Hugo, Lodestar, and Astounding Award Finalists
    1,488 valid nominating ballots, including 6 paper ballots
    23,543 nominations for 4,299 works and individuals across 21
    categories.

    Best Novel

    A DROP OF CORRUPTION by Robert Jackson Bennett (Del Rey;
    Hodderscape)
    DEATH OF THE AUTHOR by Nnedi Okorafor (William Morrow; Gollancz)
    SHROUD by Adrian Tchaikovsky (Tor UK; Orbit US)
    THE EVERLASTING by Alix E. Harrow (Tor US; Tor UK)
    THE INCANDESCENT by Emily Tesh (Tor US; Orbit UK)
    THE RAVEN SCHOLAR by Antonia Hodgson (Orbit US; Hodderscape)

    1,153 ballots cast for 555 nominees. Finalists range 126-210.

    Best Novella

    AUTOMATIC NOODLE by Annalee Newitz (Tordotcom)
    CINDER HOUSE by Freya Marske (Tordotcom; Tor UK)
    MURDER BY MEMORY by Olivia Waite (Tordotcom)
    THE RIVER HAS ROOTS by Amal El-Mohtar (Tordotcom; Arcadia UK)
    THE SUMMER WAR by Naomi Novik (Del Rey US; Del Rey UK)
    WHAT STALKS THE DEEP by T. Kingfisher (Nightfire; Titan UK)

    807 ballots cast for 172 nominees. Finalists range 90-241.

    Best Novelette

    "Kaiju Agonistes" by Scott Lynch (Uncanny Magazine, Issue 62)
    "Never Eaten Vegetables" by H.H. Pak (Clarkesworld, Issue 220)
    "Rapport: Friendship, Solidarity, Communion, Empathy"
    by Martha Wells (Reactor, July 10, 2025)
    "The Girl That My Mother Is Leaving Me For" by Cameron Reed
    (Reactor, April 2, 2025)
    "The Millay Illusion" by Sarah Pinsker (Uncanny Magazine, Issue 67)
    "When He Calls Your Name" by Catherynne M. Valente
    (Uncanny Magazine, Issue 65)

    414 ballots cast for 144 nominees. Finalists range 36-64.

    Best Short Story

    "10 Visions of the Future; or, Self-Care for the End of Days"
    by Samantha Mills (Uncanny Magazine, Issue 63)
    "In My Country" by Thomas Ha (Clarkesworld, Issue 223)
    "Laser Eyes Ain't Everything" by Effie Seiberg (Diabolical Plots,
    May 16, 2025)
    "Missing Helen" by Tia Tashiro (Clarkesworld, Issue 226)
    "Six People to Revise You" by J.R. Dawson (Uncanny Magazine,
    Issue 62)
    "Wire Mother" by Isabel J. Kim (Clarkesworld, Issue 229)

    507 ballots cast for 549 nominees. Finalists range 26-60.

    Best Series

    "Emily Wilde" by Heather Fawcett (Del Rey US; Orbit UK)
    "October Daye" by Seanan McGuire (Tor US; DAW)
    "Old ManrCOs War" by John Scalzi (Tor US; Tor UK)
    "The Chronicles" of Osreth by Katherine Addison (Tor US;
    Solaris UK; Subterranean)
    "The Craft Wars" by Max Gladstone (Tor; Tordotcom)
    "White Space" by Elizabeth Bear (Saga Press; Gollancz)

    687 ballots cast for 185 nominees. Finalists range 52-136.

    Best Graphic Story or Comic

    Absolute Wonder Woman Vol. 1: The Last Amazon
    A Girl and Her Fed
    A Wizard of Earthsea: A Graphic Novel
    The Invisible Parade
    The Power Fantasy Volume 1: The Superpowers
    The Space Cat

    362 ballots cast for 243 nominees. Finalists range 19-42.

    Best Related Work

    Colourfields: Writing About Writing About Science Fiction
    by Paul Kincaid (Briardene Books)
    Inventing the Renaissance by Ada Palmer (University of Chicago
    Press US, Head of Zeus UK)
    Last War in Albion: rCLThe Cuddled Little Vice (Sandman)rCY by
    Elizabeth Sandifer (Eruditorum Press)
    Positive Obsession: The Life and Times of Octavia E. Butler
    by Susana M. Morris (Amistad)
    rCLRagnarok vs the Long NightrCY by Ashaya and Aziz (History of
    Westeros Podcast, August 10, 2025)
    The Hugo Spreadsheet of Doom, maintained by Renay
    (Google Spreadsheet)

    479 ballots cast for 250 nominees. Finalists range 31-70.

    Best Dramatic Presentation, Long Form

    Andor (Season 2)
    Frankenstein
    KPop Demon Hunters
    Appelhans
    Sinners
    Superman

    650 ballots cast for 149 nominees. Finalists range 85-313.

    Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form

    Doctor Who: "The Story & the Engine"
    Murderbot: "All Systems Red"
    Murderbot: "The Perimeter"
    Pluribus: "We Is Us"
    Severance: "Cold Harbor"
    The Wheel of Time: "The Road to the Spear"

    471 ballots cast for 249 nominees. Finalists range 40-98.

    Best Game or Interactive Work

    Blue Prince
    Citizen Sleeper 2: Starward Vector
    Age
    Clair Obscur: Expedition 33
    Dispatch
    Hades II
    Hollow Knight: Silksong

    357 ballots cast for 159 nominees. Finalists range 29-110. (924
    raw noms)

    Best Editor Short Form

    Scott H. Andrews
    Jennifer Brozek
    Neil Clarke
    Lee Harris
    Michael Damian Thomas
    Sheila Williams

    305 ballots cast for 128 nominees. Finalists range 30-84.

    Best Editor Long Form

    Carl Engle-Laird
    Jaymee Goh
    Lee Harris
    Jenni Hill
    Joe Monti
    Diana M. Pho

    234 ballots cast for 95 nominees. Finalists range 27-74.

    Best Professional Artist

    Lulu Chen
    Kelly Chong
    Dave Kellett
    Tran Nguyen
    John Picacio
    Tom Roberts

    228 ballots cast for 220 nominees. Finalists range 10-28.

    Best Semiprozine

    Escape Pod
    khoreo magazine
    On Spec: The Canadian Magazine of the Fantastic
    Strange Horizons
    The Deadlands
    Uncanny Magazine

    324 ballots cast for 93 nominees. Finalists range 34-100.

    Best Fanzine

    Ancillary Review of Books
    An Unofficial Hugo Book Club Blog
    Galactic Journey
    Intergalactic Mixtape
    Journey Planet
    nerds of a feather, flock together

    224 ballots cast for 61 nominees. Finalists range 33-66.

    Best Fancast

    A Meal of Thorns
    Eating the Fantastic
    Hugo, Girl!
    Octothorpe
    The Coode Street Podcast
    Worldbuilding for Masochists

    370 ballots cast for 198 nominees. Finalists range 31-69.

    Best Fan Writer

    Jay Brantner for "Tar Vol"
    Alex Brown
    James Davis Nicoll
    Roseanna Pendlebury
    Jason Sanford
    Orjan Westin

    308 ballots cast for 158 nominees. Finalists range 22-54.

    Best Fan Artist
    Terri Ash
    Geneva Bowers
    Sara Felix
    Richard Man
    Espana Sheriff
    Yuumei

    176 ballots cast for 137 nominees. Finalists range 12-22.

    Best Poem

    "Care for Lightning" by Mari Ness (Uncanny Magazine, Issue 62)
    "Hex Supply Customer Support Log" by Elis Montgomery
    (Strange Horizons, Issue 25 August 2025)
    "How to Become a Sea Witch" by Theodora Goss (The Orange & Bee,
    Issue 5)
    "Landing: Seattle" by Brandon O'Brien (Seattle Worldcon 2025
    Opening Ceremony)
    "The Mourning Robot" by Angela Liu (Uncanny Magazine, Issue 66)
    "The World to Come" by Jennifer Hudak (Strange Horizons,
    Issue 22 December 2025)

    202 ballots cast for 229 nominees. Finalists range 12-35.

    Lodestar Award for Best YA Book

    Among Ghosts by Rachel Hartman (Random House Books for
    Young Readers)
    Coffeeshop in an Alternate Universe by C.B. Lee (Feiwel & Friends)
    Holy Terrors by Margaret Owen (Henry Holt; Hodderscape UK)
    Oathbound by Tracy Deonn (Simon & Schuster Books for Young Readers)
    Sunrise on the Reaping by Suzanne Collins (Scholastic Press)
    They Bloom at Night by Trang Thanh Tran (Bloomsbury US;
    Bloomsbury UK)

    244 ballots cast for 169 nominees. Finalists range 12-48.

    Astounding Award for Best New Writer (sponsored by Dell Magazines)

    Sophie Burnham (2nd year of eligibility)
    Kamilah Cole (2nd year of eligibility)
    Antonia Hodgson (1st year of eligibility)
    Molly O'Neill (1st year of eligibility)
    H.H. Pak (2nd year of eligibility)
    Jared Pechacek (2nd year of eligibility)

    290 ballots cast for 156 nominees. Finalists range 17-76.

    Disqualifications and Withdrawls

    The following nominees received enough votes to qualify for the
    final ballot, but were found to be ineligible:

    Best Series:

    Lady Astronaut, by Mary Robinette Kowal (fewer than 240,000 new
    words since last appearance on the ballot)
    The Singing Hills Cycle, by Nghi Vo (fewer than 240,000 words
    in total)


    Astounding Award:

    Silvia Park (had qualifying publication prior to 2024)
    Barbara Truelove (had qualifying publication prior to 2024)

    The following nominees received enough votes to qualify for the
    final ballot, but declined nominations:

    Best Editor, Long Form: Lindsey Hall
    Best Semiprozine: Beneath Ceaseless Skies

    The following nominee received enough votes to qualify for the
    final ballot, but was withdrawn by the showrunners to abide by the
    limitation on number of episodes of the same show allowed in the
    category.

    Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form: Murderbot: "Free Commerce"


    ===================================================================

    Evelyn C. Leeper
    evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com


    There are two hard problems in computer science:
    cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors.
    --via Dave Josephsen

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Gary McGath@garym@mcgath.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Sun Apr 26 17:02:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    On 4/26/26 9:13 AM, Evelyn C. Leeper wrote:

    SOUTH PACIFIC needs to be watched almost as an artifact. Someone
    on Usenet talked about watching SOUTH PACIFIC when she was a
    teenager in the 1980s and not understanding what everyone in the
    film was getting so agitated about--eventually she twigged to it
    being that the European Emile de Becque had married a Polynesian,
    and his children were therefore mixed-race. At the time the
    musical was first written (1927), this was shocking, and even at
    the time of the movie (1958) it was at least somewhat disapproved
    of by many. Nowadays, it can be understood only as a period
    piece, similar to GUESS WHO'S COMING TO DINNER or SHOW BOAT. (Yes,
    I understand there are still those who feel that way, but the
    general attitude is very different now from a hundred years ago.)

    "Period pieces" can still be powerful. We need reminders of what things
    were like in the past. But Wikipedia says that South Pacific premiered
    in 1949. Since it's set against a World War II background, the 1927 date
    is unlikely unless it was heavily rewritten after that.

    When I hear "Some Enchanted Evening" in my mind, it's always in Ezio
    Pinza's heavy Italian accent, which is odd considering he played a
    Frenchman.
    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Evelyn C. Leeper@evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Sun Apr 26 18:57:21 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    On 4/26/26 17:02, Gary McGath wrote:
    On 4/26/26 9:13 AM, Evelyn C. Leeper wrote:

    SOUTH PACIFIC needs to be watched almost as an artifact. Someone
    on Usenet talked about watching SOUTH PACIFIC when she was a
    teenager in the 1980s and not understanding what everyone in the
    film was getting so agitated about--eventually she twigged to it
    being that the European Emile de Becque had married a Polynesian,
    and his children were therefore mixed-race. At the time the
    musical was first written (1927), this was shocking, and even at
    the time of the movie (1958) it was at least somewhat disapproved
    of by many. Nowadays, it can be understood only as a period
    piece, similar to GUESS WHO'S COMING TO DINNER or SHOW BOAT. (Yes,
    I understand there are still those who feel that way, but the
    general attitude is very different now from a hundred years ago.)

    "Period pieces" can still be powerful. We need reminders of what things
    were like in the past. But Wikipedia says that South Pacific premiered
    in 1949. Since it's set against a World War II background, the 1927 date
    is unlikely unless it was heavily rewritten after that.

    When I hear "Some Enchanted Evening" in my mind, it's always in Ezio
    Pinza's heavy Italian accent, which is odd considering he played a Frenchman.

    I have no idea where I got the 1927 date; the book it was based on was
    written in 1947.
    --
    Evelyn C. Leeper, http://leepers.us/evelyn
    Trump: "The Iranians executed three young people for protesting."
    Renee Good, Alex Pretti, and Keith Porter could not be reached for comment.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From djheydt@djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Mon Apr 27 03:01:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    In article <10sl32a$1igvb$1@dont-email.me>,
    Evelyn C. Leeper <evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com> wrote:
    4:30 PM Them! (1954)
    [Hal Heydt]
    Amusing "Big Bug" movie. The ants are, apparently, living in the
    Los Angeles storm drain system, since they emerge into the
    (concrete) bed of the Los Angeles River.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From kludge@kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Mon Apr 27 08:16:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    Dorothy J Heydt <djheydt@kithrup.com> wrote:
    In article <10sl32a$1igvb$1@dont-email.me>,
    Evelyn C. Leeper <evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com> wrote:
    4:30 PM Them! (1954)
    [Hal Heydt]
    Amusing "Big Bug" movie. The ants are, apparently, living in the
    Los Angeles storm drain system, since they emerge into the
    (concrete) bed of the Los Angeles River.

    YOU JUST GAVE AWAY THE WHOLE PLOT!
    --scott


    I will say that this is the best giant bug movie ever made. Even
    better than Mothra.
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From djheydt@djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Mon Apr 27 14:59:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    In article <10snk31$h71$1@panix2.panix.com>,
    Scott Dorsey <kludge@panix.com> wrote:
    Dorothy J Heydt <djheydt@kithrup.com> wrote:
    In article <10sl32a$1igvb$1@dont-email.me>,
    Evelyn C. Leeper <evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com> wrote:
    4:30 PM Them! (1954)
    [Hal Heydt]
    Amusing "Big Bug" movie. The ants are, apparently, living in the
    Los Angeles storm drain system, since they emerge into the
    (concrete) bed of the Los Angeles River.

    YOU JUST GAVE AWAY THE WHOLE PLOT!
    --scott


    I will say that this is the best giant bug movie ever made. Even
    better than Mothra.
    [Hal Heydt]
    Somehow... I suspect that the plot of a movie released in 1954 is
    probably rather widely known.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Cryptoengineer@petertrei@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Mon Apr 27 14:55:12 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    On 4/27/2026 8:16 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
    Dorothy J Heydt <djheydt@kithrup.com> wrote:
    In article <10sl32a$1igvb$1@dont-email.me>,
    Evelyn C. Leeper <evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com> wrote:
    4:30 PM Them! (1954)
    [Hal Heydt]
    Amusing "Big Bug" movie. The ants are, apparently, living in the
    Los Angeles storm drain system, since they emerge into the
    (concrete) bed of the Los Angeles River.

    YOU JUST GAVE AWAY THE WHOLE PLOT!
    --scott


    I will say that this is the best giant bug movie ever made. Even
    better than Mothra.


    Them! is great, but lets' not for get MANT! the
    movie within a movie of 1993's 'Matinee'.

    https://youtu.be/EVEjdGQSzc8

    Does Starship Troopers count as a giant bug
    movie?

    pt
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tim Merrigan@tppm@ca.rr.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Mon Apr 27 12:59:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    On 4/27/2026 5:16 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
    Dorothy J Heydt <djheydt@kithrup.com> wrote:
    In article <10sl32a$1igvb$1@dont-email.me>,
    Evelyn C. Leeper <evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com> wrote:
    4:30 PM Them! (1954)
    [Hal Heydt]
    Amusing "Big Bug" movie. The ants are, apparently, living in the
    Los Angeles storm drain system, since they emerge into the
    (concrete) bed of the Los Angeles River.

    YOU JUST GAVE AWAY THE WHOLE PLOT!
    --scott


    I will say that this is the best giant bug movie ever made. Even
    better than Mothra.


    If that's the whole plot, it was given away in the first reel, as I recall.
    --

    Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.

    Tim Merrigan

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From kludge@kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Mon Apr 27 17:22:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 4/27/2026 8:16 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
    I will say that this is the best giant bug movie ever made. Even
    better than Mothra.

    Them! is great, but lets' not for get MANT! the
    movie within a movie of 1993's 'Matinee'.

    https://youtu.be/EVEjdGQSzc8

    I think Mant was very much a satire on The Fly, and while it was silly
    at best, I think the opening bit with "If a man... and an ant... were
    subjected to atomic radiation at the same time the result would be
    terrible indeed...." is one of the best SF satires ever.

    Does Starship Troopers count as a giant bug
    movie?

    Definitely. And not a good one.
    --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2