On 19/06/2026 16:57, StanWeiss wrote:
https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/news/peter-
capaldi-doctor-who-regenerations-b2998175.html
Stan
Too many regenerations thanks to Chibnall's degenerate fan fiction of
the Timeless Child monster.
On 20/06/2026 2:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/06/2026 16:57, StanWeiss wrote:The link that Stan posted included the paragraph "Doctor WhorCOs initial >26-year run, from 1963 to 1989, saw eight actors take on the lead role, >while the rebooted version has so far seen seven doctors in 21 years."
https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/news/peter-
capaldi-doctor-who-regenerations-b2998175.html
Stan
Too many regenerations thanks to Chibnall's degenerate fan fiction of
the Timeless Child monster.
So 26 years for eight Doctors (average 3.25 years each) ...... and 21
years for seven Doctors (verses 3 years each).
Not much difference.
----
Daniel70
On 2026-06-19 18:54:21 +0000, Blueshirt said:
I would like to have seen more of Capaldi's Doctor. I hope
he does some Big Finish one day....
Crapadli doesn't do audio drama himself, but Big Finish does
still make stories based around that version of the Doctor by
using a sound-alike voice actor (I can't say how accurate it
is since I've never listened to them).
On 20/06/2026 2:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/06/2026 16:57, StanWeiss wrote:The link that Stan posted included the paragraph "Doctor WhorCOs initial 26-year run, from 1963 to 1989, saw eight actors take on the lead
https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/news/peter-
capaldi-doctor-who-regenerations-b2998175.html
Stan
Too many regenerations thanks to Chibnall's degenerate fan fiction of
the Timeless Child monster.
role, while the rebooted version has so far seen seven doctors in 21
years."
So 26 years for eight Doctors (average 3.25 years each) ...... and 21
years for seven Doctors (verses 3 years each).
Not much difference.
On 6/20/2026 8:30 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
The link that Stan posted included the paragraph "Doctor
WhorCOs initial 26-year run, from 1963 to 1989, saw eight
actors take on the lead role, while the rebooted version
has so far seen seven doctors in 21 years."
So 26 years for eight Doctors (average 3.25 years each)
...... and 21 years for seven Doctors (verses 3 years each).
Not much difference.
I don't have the number, but I believe if you remove Tom Baker
from the initial group the other 7 don't average any better.
On 20/06/2026 2:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/06/2026 16:57, StanWeiss wrote:The link that Stan posted included the paragraph "Doctor WhorCOs initial 26-year run, from 1963 to 1989, saw eight actors take on the lead role, while the rebooted version has so far seen seven doctors in 21 years."
https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/news/peter-
capaldi-doctor-who-regenerations-b2998175.html
Stan
Too many regenerations thanks to Chibnall's degenerate fan fiction of
the Timeless Child monster.
So 26 years for eight Doctors (average 3.25 years each) ...... and 21
years for seven Doctors (verses 3 years each).
Not much difference.
And DW should have never been pulled in the 1980s.
StanWeiss wrote:
On 6/20/2026 8:30 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
The link that Stan posted included the paragraph "Doctor WhorCOs initial >>> 26-year run, from 1963 to 1989, saw eight actors take on the lead
role, while the rebooted version has so far seen seven doctors in 21
years."
So 26 years for eight Doctors (average 3.25 years each) ...... and 21
years for seven Doctors (verses 3 years each).
Not much difference.
I don't have the number, but I believe if you remove Tom Baker from the
initial group the other 7 don't average any better.
I don't want to start-up Maths class again, but the sums are wrong.
There were only seven Doctors between 1963 and 1989, but if you push
the classic-era out to include the 8th Doctor, then it's 1963 - 1996.
So eight Doctors between 33 years.
Your Name wrote:
On 2026-06-19 18:54:21 +0000, Blueshirt said:
I would like to have seen more of Capaldi's Doctor. I hope
he does some Big Finish one day....
Crapadli doesn't do audio drama himself, but Big Finish does
still make stories based around that version of the Doctor by
using a sound-alike voice actor (I can't say how accurate it
is since I've never listened to them).
Jon Culshaw.
On 6/20/2026 8:30 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/06/2026 2:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/06/2026 16:57, StanWeiss wrote:The link that Stan posted included the paragraph "Doctor WhorCOs initial
https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/news/peter-
capaldi-doctor-who-regenerations-b2998175.html
Stan
Too many regenerations thanks to Chibnall's degenerate fan fiction of
the Timeless Child monster.
26-year run, from 1963 to 1989, saw eight actors take on the lead
role, while the rebooted version has so far seen seven doctors in 21
years."
So 26 years for eight Doctors (average 3.25 years each) ...... and 21
years for seven Doctors (verses 3 years each).
Not much difference.
I don't have the number, but I believe if you remove Tom Baker from the >initial group the other 7 don't average any better.
Stan
----
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >www.avast.com
On 20/06/2026 13:30, Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/06/2026 2:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/06/2026 16:57, StanWeiss wrote:The link that Stan posted included the paragraph "Doctor WhorCOs initial
https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/news/peter-
capaldi-doctor-who-regenerations-b2998175.html
Stan
Too many regenerations thanks to Chibnall's degenerate fan fiction of
the Timeless Child monster.
26-year run, from 1963 to 1989, saw eight actors take on the lead role,
while the rebooted version has so far seen seven doctors in 21 years."
It was 8 Doctors in 33 years. Average is 4.125 years per incarnation.
If you count by series then it's 8 Doctors in 27 series counting the TVM
or 3.375 years per incarnation. Not counting the TVM then 3.25 years per >incarnation.
So 26 years for eight Doctors (average 3.25 years each) ...... and 21
years for seven Doctors (verses 3 years each).
Not much difference.
Eccleston, Tennant, Smith, Hurt, Capaldi, Whittaker, Martin, Tennant II, >Gatwa, and countless other incarnations of the Timeless Child monster.
That's 9+ fake Doctors in 20 years or 2.22... or fewer years per >incarnation.
If you just count series then its 9+ fake Doctors over 16 series
counting the Tennant II specials or 1.77... years per incarnation.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
The Doctor wrote:
And DW should have never been pulled in the 1980s.
Wrong! It most definitely should!
There's very little between the state of the show now
and back then. Unpopular Doctor, declining viewers. Both
eras needed putting out of their misery.
On 2026-06-20 14:29:57 +0000, Blueshirt said:
StanWeiss wrote:
On 6/20/2026 8:30 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
The link that Stan posted included the paragraph "Doctor WhorCOs initial >>>> 26-year run, from 1963 to 1989, saw eight actors take on the lead
role, while the rebooted version has so far seen seven doctors in 21 >>>> years."
So 26 years for eight Doctors (average 3.25 years each) ...... and 21 >>>> years for seven Doctors (verses 3 years each).
Not much difference.
I don't have the number, but I believe if you remove Tom Baker from the >>> initial group the other 7 don't average any better.
I don't want to start-up Maths class again, but the sums are wrong.
There were only seven Doctors between 1963 and 1989, but if you push
the classic-era out to include the 8th Doctor, then it's 1963 - 1996.
So eight Doctors between 33 years.
You can't include the years when nothing was being made. :-)
On 2026-06-20 14:29:57 +0000, Blueshirt said:
StanWeiss wrote:
On 6/20/2026 8:30 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
The link that Stan posted included the paragraph "Doctor
WhorCOs initial 26-year run, from 1963 to 1989, saw
eight actors take on the lead role, while the rebooted
version has so far seen seven doctors in 21 years."
So 26 years for eight Doctors (average 3.25 years each)
...... and 21 years for seven Doctors (verses 3 years
each).
Not much difference.
I don't have the number, but I believe if you remove Tom
Baker from the initial group the other 7 don't average
any better.
I don't want to start-up Maths class again, but the sums are
wrong.
There were only seven Doctors between 1963 and 1989, but if
you push the classic-era out to include the 8th Doctor,
then it's 1963 - 1996. So eight Doctors between 33 years.
You can't include the years when nothing was being made. :-)
In article <xn0pr9f631nt7r9003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
And DW should have never been pulled in the 1980s.
Wrong! It most definitely should!
There's very little between the state of the show now
and back then. Unpopular Doctor, declining viewers. Both
eras needed putting out of their misery.
You are wrong!
Your Name wrote:
On 2026-06-20 14:29:57 +0000, Blueshirt said:
StanWeiss wrote:
On 6/20/2026 8:30 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
The link that Stan posted included the paragraph "Doctor
WhorCOs initial 26-year run, from 1963 to 1989, saw
eight actors take on the lead role, while the rebooted
version has so far seen seven doctors in 21 years."
So 26 years for eight Doctors (average 3.25 years each)
...... and 21 years for seven Doctors (verses 3 years
each).
Not much difference.
I don't have the number, but I believe if you remove Tom
Baker from the initial group the other 7 don't average
any better.
I don't want to start-up Maths class again, but the sums are
wrong.
There were only seven Doctors between 1963 and 1989, but if
you push the classic-era out to include the 8th Doctor,
then it's 1963 - 1996. So eight Doctors between 33 years.
You can't include the years when nothing was being made. :-)
You can't include a Doctor six years before he was a Doctor
either! :-)
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pr9f631nt7r9003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
And DW should have never been pulled in the 1980s.
Wrong! It most definitely should!
There's very little between the state of the show now
and back then. Unpopular Doctor, declining viewers. Both
eras needed putting out of their misery.
You are wrong!
The people who switched off in the late 1980's and after 2023
say otherwise.
Both eras saw the "Doctor Who" ratings tank. FACT.
On 20/06/2026 13:30, Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/06/2026 2:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/06/2026 16:57, StanWeiss wrote:The link that Stan posted included the paragraph "Doctor WhorCOs initial
https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/news/peter-Too many regenerations thanks to Chibnall's degenerate fan fiction of
capaldi-doctor-who-regenerations-b2998175.html
Stan
the Timeless Child monster.
26-year run, from 1963 to 1989, saw eight actors take on the lead
role, while the rebooted version has so far seen seven doctors in 21
years."
It was 8 Doctors in 33 years. Average is 4.125 years per incarnation.
If you count by series then it's 8 Doctors in 27 series counting the TVM
or 3.375 years per incarnation. Not counting the TVM then 3.25 years per incarnation.
So 26 years for eight Doctors (average 3.25 years each) ...... and 21
years for seven Doctors (verses 3 years each).
Not much difference.
Eccleston, Tennant, Smith, Hurt, Capaldi, Whittaker, Martin, Tennant II, Gatwa, and countless other incarnations of the Timeless Child monster.
That's 9+ fake Doctors in 20 years or 2.22... or fewer years per incarnation.
If you just count series then its 9+ fake Doctors over 16 series
counting the Tennant II specials or 1.77... years per incarnation.
DoctorDavid *IS* the *TENTH DOCTOR*!! No "if's", no "but's"!!
On 21/06/2026 3:01 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/06/2026 13:30, Daniel70 wrote:'Tennant II'?? 'Fourteenth DoctorDavid'?? They're STILL DoctorDavid.
On 20/06/2026 2:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/06/2026 16:57, StanWeiss wrote:The link that Stan posted included the paragraph "Doctor WhorCOs
https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/news/peter-Too many regenerations thanks to Chibnall's degenerate fan fiction
capaldi-doctor-who-regenerations-b2998175.html
Stan
of the Timeless Child monster.
initial 26-year run, from 1963 to 1989, saw eight actors take on the
lead role, while the rebooted version has so far seen seven doctors
in 21 years."
It was 8 Doctors in 33 years. Average is 4.125 years per incarnation.
If you count by series then it's 8 Doctors in 27 series counting the
TVM or 3.375 years per incarnation. Not counting the TVM then 3.25
years per incarnation.
So 26 years for eight Doctors (average 3.25 years each) ...... and 21
years for seven Doctors (verses 3 years each).
Not much difference.
Eccleston, Tennant, Smith, Hurt, Capaldi, Whittaker, Martin, Tennant
II, Gatwa, and countless other incarnations of the Timeless Child
monster.
That's 9+ fake Doctors in 20 years or 2.22... or fewer years per
incarnation.
If you just count series then its 9+ fake Doctors over 16 series
counting the Tennant II specials or 1.77... years per incarnation.
I mean, back in ClassicWho era, with the multi-Doctor episodes, did 'WE' give THEM new numbers each time?? NO, we did NOT!!
If so, we might be up to the Twenty-FifthDoctor or ThirtiethDoctor by now!!
DoctorDavid *IS* the *TENTH DOCTOR*!! No "if's", no "but's"!!
On 21/06/2026 3:01 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/06/2026 13:30, Daniel70 wrote:'Tennant II'?? 'Fourteenth DoctorDavid'?? They're STILL DoctorDavid.
On 20/06/2026 2:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/06/2026 16:57, StanWeiss wrote:The link that Stan posted included the paragraph "Doctor WhorCOs initial >>> 26-year run, from 1963 to 1989, saw eight actors take on the lead
https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/news/peter-Too many regenerations thanks to Chibnall's degenerate fan fiction of >>>> the Timeless Child monster.
capaldi-doctor-who-regenerations-b2998175.html
Stan
role, while the rebooted version has so far seen seven doctors in 21
years."
It was 8 Doctors in 33 years. Average is 4.125 years per incarnation.
If you count by series then it's 8 Doctors in 27 series counting the TVM
or 3.375 years per incarnation. Not counting the TVM then 3.25 years per
incarnation.
So 26 years for eight Doctors (average 3.25 years each) ...... and 21
years for seven Doctors (verses 3 years each).
Not much difference.
Eccleston, Tennant, Smith, Hurt, Capaldi, Whittaker, Martin, Tennant II,
Gatwa, and countless other incarnations of the Timeless Child monster.
That's 9+ fake Doctors in 20 years or 2.22... or fewer years per
incarnation.
If you just count series then its 9+ fake Doctors over 16 series
counting the Tennant II specials or 1.77... years per incarnation.
I mean, back in ClassicWho era, with the multi-Doctor episodes, did 'WE' >give THEM new numbers each time?? NO, we did NOT!!
If so, we might be up to the Twenty-FifthDoctor or ThirtiethDoctor by now!!
DoctorDavid *IS* the *TENTH DOCTOR*!! No "if's", no "but's"!!
----
Daniel70
Verily, in article <1118ov2$ql58$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 >@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
DoctorDavid *IS* the *TENTH DOCTOR*!! No "if's", no "but's"!!
You can count him that way if you like, but the BBC's official count is >different.
When Tom Baker guest starred, he implied that he was the Doctor and had >regenerated into Tom Baker again. Does that mean the Fifth Doctor
appeared? I wouldn't say so. He wasn't the same man whom we saw
regenerate into Peter Davison.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 21/06/2026 14:29, Daniel70 wrote:
On 21/06/2026 3:01 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/06/2026 13:30, Daniel70 wrote:'Tennant II'?? 'Fourteenth DoctorDavid'?? They're STILL DoctorDavid.
On 20/06/2026 2:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/06/2026 16:57, StanWeiss wrote:The link that Stan posted included the paragraph "Doctor WhorCOs
https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/news/peter- >>>>>> capaldi-doctor-who-regenerations-b2998175.htmlToo many regenerations thanks to Chibnall's degenerate fan fiction
Stan
of the Timeless Child monster.
initial 26-year run, from 1963 to 1989, saw eight actors take on the
lead role, while the rebooted version has so far seen seven doctors
in 21 years."
It was 8 Doctors in 33 years. Average is 4.125 years per incarnation.
If you count by series then it's 8 Doctors in 27 series counting the
TVM or 3.375 years per incarnation. Not counting the TVM then 3.25
years per incarnation.
So 26 years for eight Doctors (average 3.25 years each) ...... and 21 >>>> years for seven Doctors (verses 3 years each).
Not much difference.
Eccleston, Tennant, Smith, Hurt, Capaldi, Whittaker, Martin, Tennant
II, Gatwa, and countless other incarnations of the Timeless Child
monster.
That's 9+ fake Doctors in 20 years or 2.22... or fewer years per
incarnation.
If you just count series then its 9+ fake Doctors over 16 series
counting the Tennant II specials or 1.77... years per incarnation.
I mean, back in ClassicWho era, with the multi-Doctor episodes, did 'WE'
give THEM new numbers each time?? NO, we did NOT!!
If so, we might be up to the Twenty-FifthDoctor or ThirtiethDoctor by now!! >>
DoctorDavid *IS* the *TENTH DOCTOR*!! No "if's", no "but's"!!
Stop making yourself look like an ignorant fool again. Did you actually >watch the 60th anniversary specials staring Tennant? No of course you >didn't. If you did you'd realise that Tennant II is actually a
completely different incarnation of the Doctor and the character and >incarnation is not the same as the 10th Doctor.
And I thought it was only women that had problems understanding
character and characterisation. No, the demographic of people who can't >understand basic literary concepts and people who are different to >themselves also includes men who are stupid like you, and the woke.
Remember the problems you had with the maths questions I set? You
thought that you knew everything there was to know and because you'd
never seen it before it was wrong. You made a complete fool of yourself
and your sister who you claimed studied maths at university and yet she >didn't seem to understand A Level maths, which the level below degree
level, or know that it even existed.
Tennant II is a completely different incarnation of the Doctor as is
HandDoc and as Melissa points out elsewhere so is the Curator. So I was >wrong, it's not 9+ incarnations, it's 11+ plus incarnations over 15
series or 20 years. So each fake Doctor in the new series averages 1.36 >series or 1.81... years.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 21/06/2026 14:29, Daniel70 wrote:
On 21/06/2026 3:01 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/06/2026 13:30, Daniel70 wrote:'Tennant II'?? 'Fourteenth DoctorDavid'?? They're STILL
On 20/06/2026 2:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/06/2026 16:57, StanWeiss wrote:The link that Stan posted included the paragraph "Doctor WhorCOs
https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/news/peter-Too many regenerations thanks to Chibnall's degenerate fan
capaldi-doctor-who-regenerations-b2998175.html
Stan
fiction of the Timeless Child monster.
initial 26-year run, from 1963 to 1989, saw eight actors take
on the lead role, while the rebooted version has so far seen
seven doctors in 21 years."
It was 8 Doctors in 33 years. Average is 4.125 years per
incarnation.
If you count by series then it's 8 Doctors in 27 series counting
the TVM or 3.375 years per incarnation. Not counting the TVM
then 3.25 years per incarnation.
So 26 years for eight Doctors (average 3.25 years each) ......
and 21 years for seven Doctors (verses 3 years each).
Not much difference.
Eccleston, Tennant, Smith, Hurt, Capaldi, Whittaker, Martin,
Tennant II, Gatwa, and countless other incarnations of the
Timeless Child monster.
That's 9+ fake Doctors in 20 years or 2.22... or fewer years per
incarnation.
If you just count series then its 9+ fake Doctors over 16 series
counting the Tennant II specials or 1.77... years per
incarnation.
DoctorDavid.
I mean, back in ClassicWho era, with the multi-Doctor episodes,
did 'WE' give THEM new numbers each time?? NO, we did NOT!!
If so, we might be up to the Twenty-FifthDoctor or ThirtiethDoctor
by now!!
DoctorDavid *IS* the *TENTH DOCTOR*!! No "if's", no "but's"!!
Stop making yourself look like an ignorant fool again. Did you
actually watch the 60th anniversary specials staring Tennant? No of
course you didn't.
If you did you'd realise that Tennant II is actually a completely
different incarnation of the Doctor
and the character and incarnation is not the same as the 10th
Doctor.
And I thought it was only women that had problems understanding
character and characterisation. No, the demographic of people who
can't understand basic literary concepts and people who are
different to themselves also includes men who are stupid like you,
and the woke.
Remember the problems you had with the maths questions I set? You
thought that you knew everything there was to know
and because you'd never seen it before it was wrong. You made a
complete fool of yourself > and your sister who you claimed studied
maths at university and yet she didn't seem to understand A Level
maths, which the level below degree level, or know that it even
existed.
Tennant II is a completely different incarnation of the Doctor as is
HandDoc and as Melissa points out elsewhere so is the Curator.
So I was wrong, it's not 9+ incarnations, it's 11+ plus incarnations
over 15 series or 20 years. So each fake Doctor in the new series
averages 1.36 series or 1.81... years.
On 22/06/2026 2:52 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/06/2026 14:29, Daniel70 wrote:
On 21/06/2026 3:01 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/06/2026 13:30, Daniel70 wrote:'Tennant II'?? 'Fourteenth DoctorDavid'?? They're STILL
On 20/06/2026 2:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/06/2026 16:57, StanWeiss wrote:The link that Stan posted included the paragraph "Doctor WhorCOs
https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/news/peter-Too many regenerations thanks to Chibnall's degenerate fan
capaldi-doctor-who-regenerations-b2998175.html
Stan
fiction of the Timeless Child monster.
initial 26-year run, from 1963 to 1989, saw eight actors take
on the lead role, while the rebooted version has so far seen
seven doctors in 21 years."
It was 8 Doctors in 33 years. Average is 4.125 years per
incarnation.
If you count by series then it's 8 Doctors in 27 series counting
the TVM or 3.375 years per incarnation. Not counting the TVM
then 3.25 years per incarnation.
So 26 years for eight Doctors (average 3.25 years each) ......
and 21 years for seven Doctors (verses 3 years each).
Not much difference.
Eccleston, Tennant, Smith, Hurt, Capaldi, Whittaker, Martin,
Tennant II, Gatwa, and countless other incarnations of the
Timeless Child monster.
That's 9+ fake Doctors in 20 years or 2.22... or fewer years per
incarnation.
If you just count series then its 9+ fake Doctors over 16 series
counting the Tennant II specials or 1.77... years per
incarnation.
DoctorDavid.
I mean, back in ClassicWho era, with the multi-Doctor episodes,
did 'WE' give THEM new numbers each time?? NO, we did NOT!!
If so, we might be up to the Twenty-FifthDoctor or ThirtiethDoctor
by now!!
DoctorDavid *IS* the *TENTH DOCTOR*!! No "if's", no "but's"!!
Stop making yourself look like an ignorant fool again. Did you
actually watch the 60th anniversary specials staring Tennant? No of
course you didn't.
That was the one with the Bi-Regeneration, wasn't it?? Been there, Seen >that!!
If you did you'd realise that Tennant II is actually a completely
different incarnation of the Doctor
Memory failing me!! (shock!! Horror!) In that 60th Anniversary >"regeneration", did we actually see JodieDoc transform into DoctorDavid
like we have in previous regenerations??
Or did we see JodieDoc in one scene and THEN see DoctorDavid appear out
of The TARDIS in another scene??
No actually showing one becoming the other .... as we normally do.
and the character and incarnation is not the same as the 10th
Doctor.
The Regeneration Scene certainly isn't the same!!
And I thought it was only women that had problems understanding
character and characterisation. No, the demographic of people who
can't understand basic literary concepts and people who are
different to themselves also includes men who are stupid like you,
and the woke.
Remember the problems you had with the maths questions I set? You
thought that you knew everything there was to know
Sorry! When did I EVER state that, Aggy?? Sure, I've done some Maths but
I didn't go to Uni to study it .... or study anything, actually!!
and because you'd never seen it before it was wrong. You made a
complete fool of yourself > and your sister who you claimed studied
maths at university and yet she didn't seem to understand A Level
maths, which the level below degree level, or know that it even
existed.
Tennant II is a completely different incarnation of the Doctor as is
HandDoc and as Melissa points out elsewhere so is the Curator.
"The Curator"?? When the hell did David Tennant EVER portray The
Curator?? Tom Baker, Sure, but NOT David!!
So I was wrong, it's not 9+ incarnations, it's 11+ plus incarnationsYou are WRONG, Aggy, WRONG!!
over 15 series or 20 years. So each fake Doctor in the new series
averages 1.36 series or 1.81... years.
----
Daniel70
On 22/06/2026 2:52 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/06/2026 14:29, Daniel70 wrote:
Stop making yourself look like an ignorant fool again.
Did you actually watch the 60th anniversary specials
staring Tennant? No of course you didn't.
That was the one with the Bi-Regeneration, wasn't it??
Been there, Seen that!!
If you did you'd realise that Tennant II is actually a
completely different incarnation of the Doctor
Memory failing me!! (shock!! Horror!) In that 60th Anniversary "regeneration", did we actually see JodieDoc transform into
DoctorDavid like we have in previous regenerations??
Or did we see JodieDoc in one scene and THEN see DoctorDavid
appear out of The TARDIS in another scene??
No actually showing one becoming the other .... as we normally
do.
and the character and incarnation is not the same as the
10th Doctor.
The Regeneration Scene certainly isn't the same!!
Daniel70 wrote:
On 22/06/2026 2:52 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/06/2026 14:29, Daniel70 wrote:
Stop making yourself look like an ignorant fool again.
Did you actually watch the 60th anniversary specials
staring Tennant? No of course you didn't.
That was the one with the Bi-Regeneration, wasn't it??
Been there, Seen that!!
How? It wasn't on ABC!
Did you sneakily subscribe to Disney+ or something? The
bi-generation scene was in "The Giggle" which was one of
the 60th anniversary specials.
If you did you'd realise that Tennant II is actually a
completely different incarnation of the Doctor
Memory failing me!! (shock!! Horror!) In that 60th Anniversary
"regeneration", did we actually see JodieDoc transform into
DoctorDavid like we have in previous regenerations??
Er, yes we did actually. As been pointed out to you whenever you
say that!
Like the trains in the sky thing, you keep repeating yourself
and don't listen to anybody when they correct you!
So in English...
WE SAW THE ACTUAL REGENERATION!!!
Or did we see JodieDoc in one scene and THEN see DoctorDavid
appear out of The TARDIS in another scene??
Nope. We saw the regeneration. - As mentioned above! :-)
No actually showing one becoming the other .... as we normally
do.
And we did that time too... you obviously didn't though!
and the character and incarnation is not the same as the
10th Doctor.
The Regeneration Scene certainly isn't the same!!
Er... try again.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 22/06/2026 2:52 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/06/2026 14:29, Daniel70 wrote:
Stop making yourself look like an ignorant fool again.
Did you actually watch the 60th anniversary specials
staring Tennant? No of course you didn't.
That was the one with the Bi-Regeneration, wasn't it??
Been there, Seen that!!
How? It wasn't on ABC!
Did you sneakily subscribe to Disney+ or something? The
bi-generation scene was in "The Giggle" which was one of
the 60th anniversary specials.
If you did you'd realise that Tennant II is actually a
completely different incarnation of the Doctor
Memory failing me!! (shock!! Horror!) In that 60th Anniversary
"regeneration", did we actually see JodieDoc transform into
DoctorDavid like we have in previous regenerations??
Er, yes we did actually. As been pointed out to you whenever you
say that!
Like the trains in the sky thing, you keep repeating yourself
and don't listen to anybody when they correct you!
So in English...
WE SAW THE ACTUAL REGENERATION!!!
Or did we see JodieDoc in one scene and THEN see DoctorDavid
appear out of The TARDIS in another scene??
Nope. We saw the regeneration. - As mentioned above! :-)
No actually showing one becoming the other .... as we normally
do.
And we did that time too... you obviously didn't though!
and the character and incarnation is not the same as the
10th Doctor.
The Regeneration Scene certainly isn't the same!!
Er... try again.
On 23/06/2026 12:03 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
That was the one with the Bi-Regeneration, wasn't it??
Been there, Seen that!!
How? It wasn't on ABC!
Did you sneakily subscribe to Disney+ or something? The
bi-generation scene was in "The Giggle" which was one of
the 60th anniversary specials.
Must have been on Free-to-Air ABC .... or did I imagine it??
Hang on, I think youngest sister has Disney+. Maybe I visited
them way back then. ;-P
Memory failing me!! (shock!! Horror!) In that 60th
Anniversary "regeneration", did we actually see JodieDoc
transform into DoctorDavid like we have in previous
regenerations??
Er, yes we did actually. As been pointed out to you whenever
you say that!
But YOU Guys MUST be wrong!! I mean .... I KNOW MY 'DOCTOR
WHO'!!
Like the trains in the sky thing, you keep repeating yourself
and don't listen to anybody when they correct you!
... and I was right about the Train thing!! ;-)
Or did we see JodieDoc in one scene and THEN see
DoctorDavid appear out of The TARDIS in another scene??
Nope. We saw the regeneration. - As mentioned above! :-)
But can I believe you, Blueshirt??
and the character and incarnation is not the same as the
10th Doctor.
The Regeneration Scene certainly isn't the same!!
Er... try again.
No, you'll just have to believe me. ;-)
On 23/06/2026 12:03 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 22/06/2026 2:52 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/06/2026 14:29, Daniel70 wrote:
Stop making yourself look like an ignorant fool again.
Did you actually watch the 60th anniversary specials
staring Tennant? No of course you didn't.
That was the one with the Bi-Regeneration, wasn't it??
Been there, Seen that!!
How? It wasn't on ABC!
Did you sneakily subscribe to Disney+ or something? The
bi-generation scene was in "The Giggle" which was one of
the 60th anniversary specials.
Must have been on Free-to-Air ABC .... or did I imagine it??
Hang on, I think youngest sister has Disney+. Maybe I visited them way
back then. ;-P
If you did you'd realise that Tennant II is actually a
completely different incarnation of the Doctor
Memory failing me!! (shock!! Horror!) In that 60th Anniversary
"regeneration", did we actually see JodieDoc transform into
DoctorDavid like we have in previous regenerations??
Er, yes we did actually. As been pointed out to you whenever you
say that!
But YOU Guys MUST be wrong!! I mean .... I KNOW MY 'DOCTOR WHO'!!
Like the trains in the sky thing, you keep repeating yourself
and don't listen to anybody when they correct you!
... and I was right about the Train thing!! ;-)
So in English...
WE SAW THE ACTUAL REGENERATION!!!
Or did we see JodieDoc in one scene and THEN see DoctorDavid
appear out of The TARDIS in another scene??
Nope. We saw the regeneration. - As mentioned above! :-)
But can I believe you, Blueshirt??
No, you'll just have to believe me. ;-)No actually showing one becoming the other .... as we normally
do.
And we did that time too... you obviously didn't though!
and the character and incarnation is not the same as the
10th Doctor.
The Regeneration Scene certainly isn't the same!!
Er... try again.
----
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 23/06/2026 12:03 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
That was the one with the Bi-Regeneration, wasn't it??
Been there, Seen that!!
How? It wasn't on ABC!
Did you sneakily subscribe to Disney+ or something? The
bi-generation scene was in "The Giggle" which was one of
the 60th anniversary specials.
Must have been on Free-to-Air ABC .... or did I imagine it??
"The Giggle" most definitely was not on ABC in Australia!
Hang on, I think youngest sister has Disney+. Maybe I visited
them way back then. ;-P
Well... that could have happened.
If so, you should have told her to put the kettle on again and
watched some more episodes.
Memory failing me!! (shock!! Horror!) In that 60th
Anniversary "regeneration", did we actually see JodieDoc
transform into DoctorDavid like we have in previous
regenerations??
Er, yes we did actually. As been pointed out to you whenever
you say that!
But YOU Guys MUST be wrong!! I mean .... I KNOW MY 'DOCTOR
WHO'!!
Like a goldfish knows his little arch thing and nice shiny
pebbles.
Until the next time he swims around...
Like the trains in the sky thing, you keep repeating yourself
and don't listen to anybody when they correct you!
... and I was right about the Train thing!! ;-)
Er... you wasn't actually.
Or did we see JodieDoc in one scene and THEN see
DoctorDavid appear out of The TARDIS in another scene??
Nope. We saw the regeneration. - As mentioned above! :-)
But can I believe you, Blueshirt??
Well, I have actually watched the episodes... so that should
count for something! ;-)
No, you'll just have to believe me. ;-)and the character and incarnation is not the same as the
10th Doctor.
The Regeneration Scene certainly isn't the same!!
Er... try again.
I can't! As my memory isn't failing so I can remember it
properly.
I wouldn't mind, but I'm pretty sure I posted the YouTube clip
the last time we did 'this'!
Daniel70 wrote:
On 23/06/2026 12:03 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
That was the one with the Bi-Regeneration, wasn't it??
Been there, Seen that!!
How? It wasn't on ABC!
Did you sneakily subscribe to Disney+ or something? The
bi-generation scene was in "The Giggle" which was one of
the 60th anniversary specials.
Must have been on Free-to-Air ABC .... or did I imagine it??
"The Giggle" most definitely was not on ABC in Australia!
Hang on, I think youngest sister has Disney+. Maybe I visited
them way back then. ;-P
Well... that could have happened.
If so, you should have told her to put the kettle on again and
watched some more episodes.
On 23/06/2026 11:09 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 23/06/2026 12:03 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
That was the one with the Bi-Regeneration, wasn't it??
Been there, Seen that!!
How? It wasn't on ABC!
Did you sneakily subscribe to Disney+ or something? The
bi-generation scene was in "The Giggle" which was one of
the 60th anniversary specials.
Must have been on Free-to-Air ABC .... or did I imagine it??
"The Giggle" most definitely was not on ABC in Australia!
Hang on, I think youngest sister has Disney+. Maybe I visited
them way back then. ;-P
Well... that could have happened.
If so, you should have told her to put the kettle on again and
watched some more episodes.
The Brother-in-Law and one or two of the girls HAD been fans .... but I >think they lost interest back in DoctorPeter's time.
They weren't really interested, now.--
--
Daniel70
In article <xn0prd9n68ht39002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
ARE you pulling a Daniel BS?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0prd9n68ht39002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
ARE you pulling a Daniel BS?
I can honestly say I am not pulling, or have ever pulled,
a Daniel.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 70 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 00:22:17 |
| Calls: | 949 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 1,325 |
| Messages: | 281,474 |