A surprising new post on Reddit reveals what seems to be a press
release, dated May 11. According to this, AMC Global Media, Sony
Pictures Television, and BBC Studios are about to announce
"a three-series global reboot of the iconic sci-fi franchise."
Production is expected to begin in 2027, with the first season slated
for global premiere in 2028. While it's true this is only a leak, the
text does follow standard formats, and AI checkers suggest it is
human-written.
Are We About to Get a Doctor Who Reboot?
At present, this is only a rumor. If the press release is genuine, then
it is clearly in a draft format; there are typical promotional quotes,
but they are currently unattributed. This does, however, correspond
with recent comments from the BBC suggesting co-financing would be
necessary for Doctor Who, and the BBC has good relations with AMC in
particular. While the leak should be treated with caution, it is
certainly plausible.
That
said, showrunners Chris Chibnall and Russell T. Davies have both
struggled to step out of the classic show's shadow, focusing a little
too much on fan-service and connectivity. That context means it's easy
to see why execs may have decided a reboot was necessary.
Doctor Who benefits from embracing "timey-wimey" plots, which means
there are ways to actually write a reboot into the show's narrative.
In that scenario, viewers would ideally get an effective relaunch that maintained an element of continuity to satisfy older fans. Skilled
writing could make it work, but it does feel like a gamble.
I guess we'll see on Monday if this latest rumour is true ...
Doctor Who's Future Reportedly Revealed as Reboot Details Appear Online
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The future of Doctor Who has been in doubt for months now, ever since
the end of the BBC's partnership with Disney+. BBC bosses insist the
future is bright for Doctor Who, but the main issue is financing;
financial pressures mean the BBC likely need another partnership to
keep the world's longest-running sci-fi TV show going. Netflix has
expressed interest in more BBC deals, but the streaming giant is far
from the only game in town, and the BBC has good relations with several
other global streamers.
A surprising new post on Reddit reveals what seems to be a press
release, dated May 11. According to this, AMC Global Media, Sony
Pictures Television, and BBC Studios are about to announce
"a three-series global reboot of the iconic sci-fi franchise."
Production is expected to begin in 2027, with the first season slated
for global premiere in 2028. While it's true this is only a leak, the
text does follow standard formats, and AI checkers suggest it is
human-written.
According to the possible leak, the three companies will jointly
finance Doctor Who. The BBC will remain responsible for airing the show
in the UK, AMC Global Media will oversee international premieres and
streaming rollout across its portfolio, while Sony Pictures Television
will lead worldwide distribution and franchise expansion.
Are We About to Get a Doctor Who Reboot?
At present, this is only a rumor. If the press release is genuine, then
it is clearly in a draft format; there are typical promotional quotes,
but they are currently unattributed. This does, however, correspond
with recent comments from the BBC suggesting co-financing would be
necessary for Doctor Who, and the BBC has good relations with AMC in
particular. While the leak should be treated with caution, it is
certainly plausible.
One word from the supposed press release is sure to draw attention from
the fandom: reboot. The idea of a reboot is certain to be controversial
given Doctor Who's long heritage; regeneration means Doctor Who has
previously been able to reinvent itself without needing reboots. That
said, showrunners Chris Chibnall and Russell T. Davies have both
struggled to step out of the classic show's shadow, focusing a little
too much on fan-service and connectivity. That context means it's easy
to see why execs may have decided a reboot was necessary.
Doctor Who benefits from embracing "timey-wimey" plots, which means
there are ways to actually write a reboot into the show's narrative. In
that scenario, viewers would ideally get an effective relaunch that
maintained an element of continuity to satisfy older fans. Skilled
writing could make it work, but it does feel like a gamble.
According to this press release, the Doctor Who relaunch "will introduce
a newly imagined narrative, refreshed cast, and expanded storytelling
scope while honoring the core mythology that has defined Doctor Who for
decades." Additional announcements will be made over the coming months,
including executive producers, a new showrunner, and a writing team.
Only time will tell whether any of this is accurate; but the reports
are certainly going to leave the fandom deeply curious.
<https://comicbook.com/tv-shows/news/doctor-whos-future-reportedly-revealed-as-reboot-details-appear-online/>
Verily, in article <10tp2hm$57pk$1@dont-email.me>, did
YourName@YourISP.com deliver unto us this message:
A surprising new post on Reddit reveals what seems to be a press
release, dated May 11. According to this, AMC Global Media, Sony
Pictures Television, and BBC Studios are about to announce
"a three-series global reboot of the iconic sci-fi franchise."
Production is expected to begin in 2027, with the first season slated
for global premiere in 2028. While it's true this is only a leak, the
text does follow standard formats, and AI checkers suggest it is
human-written.
My first thought was NO NO NO NO NO.
I'm still kind of leaning that way, but given what the show has become,
a reboot might be the best way to try to preserve the good core. As with >everything else, it depends on exactly what they do and how.
Are We About to Get a Doctor Who Reboot?
At present, this is only a rumor. If the press release is genuine, then >> it is clearly in a draft format; there are typical promotional quotes, >> but they are currently unattributed. This does, however, correspond
with recent comments from the BBC suggesting co-financing would be
necessary for Doctor Who, and the BBC has good relations with AMC in
particular. While the leak should be treated with caution, it is
certainly plausible.
Maybe the BBC should learn to work within a budget again. Their shows
were better when they had sharp budget constraints, and constraints are
a known spur to creativity.
That
said, showrunners Chris Chibnall and Russell T. Davies have both
struggled to step out of the classic show's shadow, focusing a little
too much on fan-service and connectivity. That context means it's easy
to see why execs may have decided a reboot was necessary.
I don't think of either of those two gentlemen as exessively controlled
by show history or fan desires.
Doctor Who benefits from embracing "timey-wimey" plots, which means
there are ways to actually write a reboot into the show's narrative.
In that scenario, viewers would ideally get an effective relaunch that
maintained an element of continuity to satisfy older fans. Skilled
writing could make it work, but it does feel like a gamble.
That would be ideal. In fact, it would be heavenly. Imagine a semi-
rebooted Doctor Who which got rid of all the stupid crap and segued
smoothly from either Smith or Capaldi into a new Doctor who brought a
new spin to the classic character.
If it were me, at first I wouldn't even reference other Doctors. After a >while, there'd be either a mention of regeneration or a regeneration to >change actors. We'd leave vague what parts of the past officially do and >don't count, but we'd never reference anything from the stupid years.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <10tp2hm$57pk$1@dont-email.me>, did
YourName@YourISP.com deliver unto us this message:
A surprising new post on Reddit reveals what seems to be a press
release, dated May 11. According to this, AMC Global Media, Sony
Pictures Television, and BBC Studios are about to announce
"a three-series global reboot of the iconic sci-fi franchise."
Production is expected to begin in 2027, with the first season slated
for global premiere in 2028. While it's true this is only a leak, the
text does follow standard formats, and AI checkers suggest it is
human-written.
My first thought was NO NO NO NO NO.
I'm still kind of leaning that way, but given what the show has become,
a reboot might be the best way to try to preserve the good core. As with everything else, it depends on exactly what they do and how.
Are We About to Get a Doctor Who Reboot?
At present, this is only a rumor. If the press release is genuine, then
it is clearly in a draft format; there are typical promotional quotes,
but they are currently unattributed. This does, however, correspond
with recent comments from the BBC suggesting co-financing would be
necessary for Doctor Who, and the BBC has good relations with AMC in
particular. While the leak should be treated with caution, it is
certainly plausible.
Maybe the BBC should learn to work within a budget again. Their shows
were better when they had sharp budget constraints, and constraints are
a known spur to creativity.
That said, showrunners Chris Chibnall and Russell T. Davies have both
struggled to step out of the classic show's shadow, focusing a little
too much on fan-service and connectivity. That context means it's easy
to see why execs may have decided a reboot was necessary.
I don't think of either of those two gentlemen as exessively controlled
by show history or fan desires.
Doctor Who benefits from embracing "timey-wimey" plots, which means
there are ways to actually write a reboot into the show's narrative.
In that scenario, viewers would ideally get an effective relaunch that
maintained an element of continuity to satisfy older fans. Skilled
writing could make it work, but it does feel like a gamble.
That would be ideal. In fact, it would be heavenly. Imagine a semi-
rebooted Doctor Who which got rid of all the stupid crap and segued
smoothly from either Smith or Capaldi into a new Doctor who brought a
new spin to the classic character.
If it were me, at first I wouldn't even reference other Doctors. After a while, there'd be either a mention of regeneration or a regeneration to change actors. We'd leave vague what parts of the past officially do and don't count, but we'd never reference anything from the stupid years.
On 2026-05-10 11:45:46 +0000, The True Melissa said:
Verily, in article <10tp2hm$57pk$1@dont-email.me>, did
YourName@YourISP.com deliver unto us this message:
A surprising new post on Reddit reveals what seems to be a press
release, dated May 11. According to this, AMC Global Media, Sony
Pictures Television, and BBC Studios are about to announce
"a three-series global reboot of the iconic sci-fi franchise."
Production is expected to begin in 2027, with the first season slated
for global premiere in 2028. While it's true this is only a leak, the
text does follow standard formats, and AI checkers suggest it is
human-written.
My first thought was NO NO NO NO NO.
I'm still kind of leaning that way, but given what the show has become,
a reboot might be the best way to try to preserve the good core. As with
everything else, it depends on exactly what they do and how.
The show basically "reboots" every time they change the actor playing
the Doctor, and some have been worse than others asnd some have been
more blatant than others (such as Doctoress Who simply to push the >"Equality" idiocy).
In reality, the lazy news media doesn't actually know what "reboot"
means, and they use the term to cover anything and everything that
isn't the original - remakes, resurrections, prequels, an sequels, as
well as proper reboots. It's anyeon'es guess what will really happen,
but probably no different to every other change of main actor.
Are We About to Get a Doctor Who Reboot?
At present, this is only a rumor. If the press release is genuine, then
it is clearly in a draft format; there are typical promotional quotes,
but they are currently unattributed. This does, however, correspond
with recent comments from the BBC suggesting co-financing would be
necessary for Doctor Who, and the BBC has good relations with AMC in
particular. While the leak should be treated with caution, it is
certainly plausible.
Maybe the BBC should learn to work within a budget again. Their shows
were better when they had sharp budget constraints, and constraints are
a known spur to creativity.
That said, showrunners Chris Chibnall and Russell T. Davies have both
struggled to step out of the classic show's shadow, focusing a little
too much on fan-service and connectivity. That context means it's easy
to see why execs may have decided a reboot was necessary.
I don't think of either of those two gentlemen as exessively controlled
by show history or fan desires.
Nope. They're more controlled by their own egoes and Political
Correctness stupidity ... just like most of the entertainment industry
these days. :-(
Doctor Who benefits from embracing "timey-wimey" plots, which means
there are ways to actually write a reboot into the show's narrative.
In that scenario, viewers would ideally get an effective relaunch that
maintained an element of continuity to satisfy older fans. Skilled
writing could make it work, but it does feel like a gamble.
That would be ideal. In fact, it would be heavenly. Imagine a semi-
rebooted Doctor Who which got rid of all the stupid crap and segued
smoothly from either Smith or Capaldi into a new Doctor who brought a
new spin to the classic character.
If it were me, at first I wouldn't even reference other Doctors. After a
while, there'd be either a mention of regeneration or a regeneration to
change actors. We'd leave vague what parts of the past officially do and
don't count, but we'd never reference anything from the stupid years.
Which is more or less what Disney tried to do and made most of the
awful mess that the franchise is now in. They did the same with Star
Wars too. :-(
Verily, in article <10tp2hm$57pk$1@dont-email.me>, did
YourName@YourISP.com deliver unto us this message:
A surprising new post on Reddit reveals what seems to be a press
release, dated May 11. According to this, AMC Global Media, Sony
Pictures Television, and BBC Studios are about to announce
"a three-series global reboot of the iconic sci-fi franchise."
Production is expected to begin in 2027, with the first season slated >> for global premiere in 2028. While it's true this is only a leak, the >> text does follow standard formats, and AI checkers suggest it is
human-written.
My first thought was NO NO NO NO NO.
I'm still kind of leaning that way, but given what the show has become,
a reboot might be the best way to try to preserve the good core. As with everything else, it depends on exactly what they do and how.
Are We About to Get a Doctor Who Reboot?
At present, this is only a rumor. If the press release is genuine, then >> it is clearly in a draft format; there are typical promotional quotes, >> but they are currently unattributed. This does, however, correspond
with recent comments from the BBC suggesting co-financing would be
necessary for Doctor Who, and the BBC has good relations with AMC in
particular. While the leak should be treated with caution, it is
certainly plausible.
Maybe the BBC should learn to work within a budget again. Their shows
were better when they had sharp budget constraints, and constraints are
a known spur to creativity.
That
said, showrunners Chris Chibnall and Russell T. Davies have both
struggled to step out of the classic show's shadow, focusing a little
too much on fan-service and connectivity. That context means it's easy
to see why execs may have decided a reboot was necessary.
I don't think of either of those two gentlemen as exessively controlled
by show history or fan desires.
Doctor Who benefits from embracing "timey-wimey" plots, which means
there are ways to actually write a reboot into the show's narrative.
In that scenario, viewers would ideally get an effective relaunch that
maintained an element of continuity to satisfy older fans. Skilled
writing could make it work, but it does feel like a gamble.
That would be ideal. In fact, it would be heavenly. Imagine a semi-
rebooted Doctor Who which got rid of all the stupid crap and segued
smoothly from either Smith or Capaldi into a new Doctor who brought a
new spin to the classic character.
If it were me, at first I wouldn't even reference other Doctors. After a while, there'd be either a mention of regeneration or a regeneration to change actors. We'd leave vague what parts of the past officially do and don't count, but we'd never reference anything from the stupid years.
On 10/05/2026 12:45, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tp2hm$57pk$1@dont-email.me>, did
YourName@YourISP.com deliver unto us this message:
A surprising new post on Reddit reveals what seems to be a press
release, dated May 11. According to this, AMC Global Media, Sony
Pictures Television, and BBC Studios are about to announce
"a three-series global reboot of the iconic sci-fi franchise."
Production is expected to begin in 2027, with the first season slated >>> for global premiere in 2028. While it's true this is only a leak, the >>> text does follow standard formats, and AI checkers suggest it is
human-written.
My first thought was NO NO NO NO NO.
I'm still kind of leaning that way, but given what the show has become,
a reboot might be the best way to try to preserve the good core. As with
everything else, it depends on exactly what they do and how.
The show is completely dead, reboot or no reboot. The moment they made
the show about the Doctor's sexuality and turned him into a rampant >homosexual it became totally unsuitable for children forever. No child
will date to admit school or too their friends that they ever watched
this degenerate show. No decent heterosexual parent will consider
subjecting their children to disgusting sexual grooming by a bunch of
sick and depraved perverts even if the next Doctor is portrayed as being >straight. The Doctor's sexuality should NEVER have entered the scope of
show let alone completely dominated it. It can never recover from that.
Are We About to Get a Doctor Who Reboot?
At present, this is only a rumor. If the press release is genuine, then
it is clearly in a draft format; there are typical promotional quotes, >>> but they are currently unattributed. This does, however, correspond >>> with recent comments from the BBC suggesting co-financing would be
necessary for Doctor Who, and the BBC has good relations with AMC in >>> particular. While the leak should be treated with caution, it is
certainly plausible.
Maybe the BBC should learn to work within a budget again. Their shows
were better when they had sharp budget constraints, and constraints are
a known spur to creativity.
The BBC should learn to stop sexually grooming children and hiring >disgusting perverts who want to foist their degenerate and totally
morally depraved sexual agendas on children.
That
said, showrunners Chris Chibnall and Russell T. Davies have both
struggled to step out of the classic show's shadow, focusing a little
too much on fan-service and connectivity. That context means it's easy
to see why execs may have decided a reboot was necessary.
I don't think of either of those two gentlemen as exessively controlled
by show history or fan desires.
These two degenerate pieces of s*(t didn't give a f*k about Doctor Who.
They were only interested in making the show and it's main protagonist
into an image of their own sick, degenerate, and disgusting selves, a
victim of child abuse who despises his own gender, and a brutal,
bullying, sexually harassing, racist homosexual, obsessed with satiating
his own lusts. They didn't give a damn about anyone who was different
from themselves and they didn't give a damn about Doctor Who lore.
Doctor Who lore didn't represent them so they had to change it and turn
the Doctor into a monster, the Timeless Child!
Doctor Who benefits from embracing "timey-wimey" plots, which means
there are ways to actually write a reboot into the show's narrative.
In that scenario, viewers would ideally get an effective relaunch that
maintained an element of continuity to satisfy older fans. Skilled
writing could make it work, but it does feel like a gamble.
That would be ideal. In fact, it would be heavenly. Imagine a semi-
rebooted Doctor Who which got rid of all the stupid crap and segued
smoothly from either Smith or Capaldi into a new Doctor who brought a
new spin to the classic character.
Doctor Who cannot be rebooted. An Unearthly Child would never work
today. Whose going to watch a story about a pair of kidnapped teachers
being taken back onto the stone age and encountering a tribe of savages?
It wasn't until the Daleks appeared that people started watching.
Are they going to remake every William Hartnell adventure, ending in The >Tenth Planet, and then remake Power of the Daleks all the way to The War >Games using a Patrick Troughton lookalike? They'd also have to remake
every story where the Doctor meets a new companion and then leaves them >behind, and most of those stories were not very good.
The only way that this could work is by rebooting the show as a series
of one off movies like the ones staring Peter Cushing portraying the >original Doctors and possibly writing new stories that fit in-between
the existing ones like Big Finish have done.
But the franchise is completely dead thanks to the Doctor being turned >transgender and gay and only a thorough denunciation of that and erasure >from canon would get people to reconsider.
No one will even bother to watch a reboot knowing that it would lead to >Whittaker, Gatwa, and the Doctor being the Timeless Child monster
instead of a Time Lord.
If it were me, at first I wouldn't even reference other Doctors. After a
while, there'd be either a mention of regeneration or a regeneration to
change actors. We'd leave vague what parts of the past officially do and
don't count, but we'd never reference anything from the stupid years.
There is only one way this series could be brought back and that is as
an adults only show with everything involving the lesbian Jodie
Whittaker, the homosexual and transgender David Tennant, and the
effeminate gay cry-baby Ncuti Gatwa erased from canon completely in the
same way as the series of Dallas that never was, and none of it ever >refereed to.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
the lesbian Jodie
Whittaker, the homosexual and transgender David Tennant, and the
effeminate gay cry-baby Ncuti Gatwa
Verily, in article <10tp2hm$57pk$1@dont-email.me>, did
YourName@YourISP.com deliver unto us this message:
Snip>
That would be ideal. In fact, it would be heavenly. Imagine a semi-
rebooted Doctor Who which got rid of all the stupid crap and segued
smoothly from either Smith or Capaldi into a new Doctor who brought a
new spin to the classic character.
Verily, in article <10trefm$qbkk$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
the lesbian Jodie Whittaker, the homosexual and transgender David
Tennant, and the effeminate gay cry-baby Ncuti Gatwa
I don't know much about Jodie Whittaker, but I'm pretty sure David
Tennant is neither of those things.
He did transition his child, though. That's probably why he's still
firmly committed to transmania after many started backing away.
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
On 11/05/2026 8:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10trefm$qbkk$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
the lesbian Jodie Whittaker, the homosexual and transgender David
Tennant, and the effeminate gay cry-baby Ncuti Gatwa
I don't know much about Jodie Whittaker, but I'm pretty sure David
Tennant is neither of those things.
He did transition his child, though. That's probably why he's still
firmly committed to transmania after many started backing away.
Hey, that's right, we still have DoctorDavid's Daughter "Out There" ...
so maybe SHE can be roped in .... but, hang on, she doesn't have a TARDIS!!
First adventure ... SHE goes back to Galifrey and pinches another
TARDIS!! The story almost writes itself. ;-P
On 11/05/2026 8:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10trefm$qbkk$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
the lesbian Jodie Whittaker, the homosexual and
transgender David Tennant, and the effeminate gay cry-baby
Ncuti Gatwa
I don't know much about Jodie Whittaker, but I'm pretty sure
David Tennant is neither of those things.
He did transition his child, though. That's probably why
he's still firmly committed to transmania after many
started backing away.
Hey, that's right, we still have DoctorDavid's Daughter "Out
There" ... so maybe SHE can be roped in .... but, hang on, she
doesn't have a TARDIS!!
First adventure ... SHE goes back to Galifrey and pinches
another TARDIS!! The story almost writes itself. ;-P
Verily, in article <10tsg76$136am$1@dont-email.me>, did
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 8:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
I don't know much about Jodie Whittaker, but I'm pretty
sure David Tennant is neither of those things.
He did transition his child, though. That's probably why
he's still firmly committed to transmania after many
started backing away.
Hey, that's right, we still have DoctorDavid's Daughter "Out
There" ... so maybe SHE can be roped in .... but, hang on,
she doesn't have a TARDIS!!
I meant his IRL child, but yeah, there's a clone of half of
Ten out there somewhere.
Verily, in article <10trefm$qbkk$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
the lesbian Jodie
Whittaker, the homosexual and transgender David Tennant, and the
effeminate gay cry-baby Ncuti Gatwa
I don't know much about Jodie Whittaker, but I'm pretty sure David
Tennant is neither of those things.
He did transition his child, though. That's probably why he's still
firmly committed to transmania after many started backing away.
Verily, in article <10trefm$qbkk$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
the lesbian Jodie
Whittaker, the homosexual and transgender David Tennant, and the
effeminate gay cry-baby Ncuti Gatwa
I don't know much about Jodie Whittaker, but I'm pretty sure David
Tennant is neither of those things.
He did transition his child, though. That's probably why he's still
firmly committed to transmania after many started backing away.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 10/05/2026 9:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tp2hm$57pk$1@dont-email.me>, did
YourName@YourISP.com deliver unto us this message:
Snip>
That would be ideal. In fact, it would be heavenly. Imagine a semi-
rebooted Doctor Who which got rid of all the stupid crap and segued
smoothly from either Smith or Capaldi into a new Doctor who brought a
new spin to the classic character.
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
----
Daniel70
On 11/05/2026 8:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10trefm$qbkk$1@dont-email.me>, didHey, that's right, we still have DoctorDavid's Daughter "Out There" ...
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
the lesbian Jodie Whittaker, the homosexual and transgender David
Tennant, and the effeminate gay cry-baby Ncuti Gatwa
I don't know much about Jodie Whittaker, but I'm pretty sure David
Tennant is neither of those things.
He did transition his child, though. That's probably why he's still
firmly committed to transmania after many started backing away.
so maybe SHE can be roped in .... but, hang on, she doesn't have a TARDIS!!
First adventure ... SHE goes back to Galifrey and pinches another
TARDIS!! The story almost writes itself. ;-P
----
Daniel70
Verily, in article <10tsful$133nm$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 >@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that version still
implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <10tsg76$136am$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 >@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 8:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10trefm$qbkk$1@dont-email.me>, didHey, that's right, we still have DoctorDavid's Daughter "Out There" ...
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
the lesbian Jodie Whittaker, the homosexual and transgender David
Tennant, and the effeminate gay cry-baby Ncuti Gatwa
I don't know much about Jodie Whittaker, but I'm pretty sure David
Tennant is neither of those things.
He did transition his child, though. That's probably why he's still
firmly committed to transmania after many started backing away.
so maybe SHE can be roped in .... but, hang on, she doesn't have a TARDIS!!
I meant his IRL child, but yeah, there's a clone of half of Ten out
there somewhere.
First adventure ... SHE goes back to Galifrey and pinches another
TARDIS!! The story almost writes itself. ;-P
She's never been to Gallifrey. Someone would have to show her the way. >Sounds like a good job for the Master, just to sow chaos.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Daniel70 wrote:
On 11/05/2026 8:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10trefm$qbkk$1@dont-email.me>, didHey, that's right, we still have DoctorDavid's Daughter "Out
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
the lesbian Jodie Whittaker, the homosexual and
transgender David Tennant, and the effeminate gay cry-baby
Ncuti Gatwa
I don't know much about Jodie Whittaker, but I'm pretty sure
David Tennant is neither of those things.
He did transition his child, though. That's probably why
he's still firmly committed to transmania after many
started backing away.
There" ... so maybe SHE can be roped in .... but, hang on, she
doesn't have a TARDIS!!
I'm not quite sure you've been following this thread properly.
This is now a discussion about lesbians, homosexuals and
transgender people... again.
Please keep up at the back!
First adventure ... SHE goes back to Galifrey and pinches
another TARDIS!! The story almost writes itself. ;-P
Is that DoctorDavid's Daughter, Jenny... or David Tennant's
daughter/son? (aka the Fifth Doctor's granddaughter/son.) Either
way, none of them actually come from Gallifrey!
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsg76$136am$1@dont-email.me>, did
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 8:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Hey, that's right, we still have DoctorDavid's Daughter "Out
I don't know much about Jodie Whittaker, but I'm pretty
sure David Tennant is neither of those things.
He did transition his child, though. That's probably why
he's still firmly committed to transmania after many
started backing away.
There" ... so maybe SHE can be roped in .... but, hang on,
she doesn't have a TARDIS!!
I meant his IRL child, but yeah, there's a clone of half of
Ten out there somewhere.
Give it time and I'm sure his real children will be in "Doctor
Who" one day... a couple of them are actors and they have
"Doctor Who" in their DNA, so why not?
It sounds fun to me! The Doctor, his in-universe daughter -
that's now his real life wife, with their children playing parts
in a show that their Grandad was also in... Talk about keep it
in the family!
On 11/05/2026 11:45, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10trefm$qbkk$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
the lesbian Jodie
Whittaker, the homosexual and transgender David Tennant, and the
effeminate gay cry-baby Ncuti Gatwa
I don't know much about Jodie Whittaker, but I'm pretty sure David
Tennant is neither of those things.
I was referring to the totally degenerate characters that they played.
He did transition his child, though. That's probably why he's still
firmly committed to transmania after many started backing away.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <10tsful$133nm$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that version still
implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
I guess we'll see on Monday if this latest rumour is true ...
-a-a Doctor Who's Future Reportedly Revealed as Reboot Details Appear Online
-a-a -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-a-a The future of Doctor Who has been in doubt for months now, ever since
-a-a the end of the BBC's partnership with Disney+. BBC bosses insist the
-a-a future is bright for Doctor Who, but the main issue is financing;
-a-a financial pressures mean the BBC likely need another partnership to
-a-a keep the world's longest-running sci-fi TV show going. Netflix has
-a-a expressed interest in more BBC deals, but the streaming giant is far
-a-a from the only game in town, and the BBC has good relations with several
-a-a other global streamers.
-a-a A surprising new post on Reddit reveals what seems to be a press
-a-a release, dated May 11. According to this, AMC Global Media, Sony
-a-a Pictures Television, and BBC Studios are about to announce
-a-a "a three-series global reboot of the iconic sci-fi franchise."
-a-a Production is expected to begin in 2027, with the first season slated
-a-a for global premiere in 2028. While it's true this is only a leak, the
-a-a text does follow standard formats, and AI checkers suggest it is
-a-a human-written.
On 11/05/2026 13:14, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsful$133nm$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that version still
implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
Doctor Who ended in 2017 after The Doctor Falls when Peter Capaldi died.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 10/05/2026 05:45, Your Name wrote:
I guess we'll see on Monday if this latest rumour is true ...
-a-a Doctor Who's Future Reportedly Revealed as Reboot Details Appear Online
-a-a -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-a-a The future of Doctor Who has been in doubt for months now, ever since >> -a-a the end of the BBC's partnership with Disney+. BBC bosses insist the >> -a-a future is bright for Doctor Who, but the main issue is financing;
-a-a financial pressures mean the BBC likely need another partnership to
-a-a keep the world's longest-running sci-fi TV show going. Netflix has
-a-a expressed interest in more BBC deals, but the streaming giant is far >> -a-a from the only game in town, and the BBC has good relations with several
-a-a other global streamers.
-a-a A surprising new post on Reddit reveals what seems to be a press
-a-a release, dated May 11. According to this, AMC Global Media, Sony
-a-a Pictures Television, and BBC Studios are about to announce
-a-a "a three-series global reboot of the iconic sci-fi franchise."
-a-a Production is expected to begin in 2027, with the first season slated >> -a-a for global premiere in 2028. While it's true this is only a leak, the >> -a-a text does follow standard formats, and AI checkers suggest it is
-a-a human-written.
I think it's safe to say now that this was all a pack of lies. Knowing
all the facts why would Sony and AMC fall for the same scam that Disney
fell for?
This franchise became totally unsellable the moment a bunch of sick, >depraved, child grooming perverts were allowed to turn the Doctor gay
and use him in order to sexually groom of children from overwhelmingly >heterosexual families, since homosexuals can't have children, to be like
him and themselves.
There's no way back from this. Doctor Who is no longer a family show. It >should have never been used to satiate the sick lusts of a bunch of >degenerate perverts.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 10/05/2026 05:45, Your Name wrote:
I guess we'll see on Monday if this latest rumour is
true ...
Doctor Who's Future Reportedly Revealed as Reboot
Details Appear Online -a-a ---------------------------------------------------
The future of Doctor Who has been in doubt for months
now,
[Snip]
A surprising new post on Reddit reveals what seems to be
a press release, dated May 11.
I think it's safe to say now that this was all a pack of lies.
Verily, in article <10tsg76$136am$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 8:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10trefm$qbkk$1@dont-email.me>, didHey, that's right, we still have DoctorDavid's Daughter "Out There" ...
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
the lesbian Jodie Whittaker, the homosexual and transgender David
Tennant, and the effeminate gay cry-baby Ncuti Gatwa
I don't know much about Jodie Whittaker, but I'm pretty sure David
Tennant is neither of those things.
He did transition his child, though. That's probably why he's still
firmly committed to transmania after many started backing away.
so maybe SHE can be roped in .... but, hang on, she doesn't have a TARDIS!!
I meant his IRL child, but yeah, there's a clone of half of Ten out
there somewhere.
First adventure ... SHE goes back to Galifrey and pinches another
TARDIS!! The story almost writes itself. ;-P
She's never been to Gallifrey. Someone would have to show her the way.
Sounds like a good job for the Master, just to sow chaos.
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsg76$136am$1@dont-email.me>, did
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 8:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Hey, that's right, we still have DoctorDavid's Daughter "Out
I don't know much about Jodie Whittaker, but I'm pretty
sure David Tennant is neither of those things.
He did transition his child, though. That's probably why
he's still firmly committed to transmania after many
started backing away.
There" ... so maybe SHE can be roped in .... but, hang on,
she doesn't have a TARDIS!!
I meant his IRL child, but yeah, there's a clone of half of
Ten out there somewhere.
Give it time and I'm sure his real children will be in "Doctor
Who" one day... a couple of them are actors and they have
"Doctor Who" in their DNA, so why not?
It sounds fun to me! The Doctor, his in-universe daughter -
that's now his real life wife, with their children playing parts
in a show that their Grandad was also in... Talk about keep it
in the family!
Verily, in article <10tsful$133nm$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that version still
implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
On 11/05/2026 10:17 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsg76$136am$1@dont-email.me>, did
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Hey, that's right, we still have DoctorDavid's Daughter
"Out There" ... so maybe SHE can be roped in .... but,
hang on, she doesn't have a TARDIS!!
First adventure ... SHE goes back to Galifrey and pinches
another TARDIS!! The story almost writes itself. ;-P
She's never been to Gallifrey. Someone would have to show
her the way.
But she's DoctorDavid's clone daughter or some such so
she'd have to share his knowledge, surely!!
I think the term you might have been looking for,
Blueshirt, was "All in the Family" ....
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066626/?ref_=fn_t_1
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/05/2026 05:45, Your Name wrote:
I guess we'll see on Monday if this latest rumour is
true ...
Doctor Who's Future Reportedly Revealed as Reboot
Details Appear Online aa ---------------------------------------------------
The future of Doctor Who has been in doubt for months
now,
[Snip]
A surprising new post on Reddit reveals what seems to be
a press release, dated May 11.
I think it's safe to say now that this was all a pack of lies.
It's Reddit!
Who the fuck takes anything posted there seriously?!
It's just karma farming... and/or clickbait to get attention.
Although I'm sure the BBC will partner with somebody for future
episodes of Doctor Who, but I don't see them rebooting the show
and going back to the beginning.
On 11/05/2026 10:17 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsg76$136am$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 8:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10trefm$qbkk$1@dont-email.me>, didHey, that's right, we still have DoctorDavid's Daughter "Out There" ...
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
the lesbian Jodie Whittaker, the homosexual and transgender David
Tennant, and the effeminate gay cry-baby Ncuti Gatwa
I don't know much about Jodie Whittaker, but I'm pretty sure David
Tennant is neither of those things.
He did transition his child, though. That's probably why he's still
firmly committed to transmania after many started backing away.
so maybe SHE can be roped in .... but, hang on, she doesn't have a TARDIS!!
I meant his IRL child, but yeah, there's a clone of half of Ten out
there somewhere.
First adventure ... SHE goes back to Galifrey and pinches another
TARDIS!! The story almost writes itself. ;-P
She's never been to Gallifrey. Someone would have to show her the way.
But she's DoctorDavid's clone daughter or some such so she'd have to
share his knowledge, surely!!
Verily, in article <xn0pponef1cep5r000@post.eweka.nl>, did blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/05/2026 05:45, Your Name wrote:
A surprising new post on Reddit reveals what seems
to be a press release, dated May 11.
I think it's safe to say now that this was all a pack
of lies.
It's Reddit!
Who the fuck takes anything posted there seriously?!
It's just karma farming... and/or clickbait to get attention.
People do post official releases there, though.
Although I'm sure the BBC will partner with somebody for
future episodes of Doctor Who, but I don't see them
rebooting the show and going back to the beginning.
Me neither. I think the correct theory is that nobody knows
what "reboot" means now. They're probably just going to
"reboot" with a new Doctor and maybe -- we can hope -- a
sensible vision for the show.
On 11/05/2026 10:14 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsful$133nm$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that version still
implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
To which I have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER!! I've seen it on T.V. so IT IS CANON!!
Verily, in article <10tuuoe$1sh55$2@dont-email.me>, did
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 10:14 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that
version still implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
To which I have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER!! I've seen it on
T.V. so IT IS CANON!!
I saw "The Curse of Fatal Death" on TV, too. :-\
I suppose I must regretfully agree that Whittaker is currently
in canon, but if we're retconning, we can fix that.
The True Melissa wrote:
I left Reddit years ago, I doubt it's got much better. It's
like an idiot magnet.
I'd have no problem with them starting again, but that doesn't
mean doing everything exactly the same for the next sixty
years... just taking the general premise and concept of the
show and telling stories about a time travelling alien based
on that.
The only problem would be, in the current climate it would just
be a woke sci-fi show with a box-ticking cast and storylines
dumbed down for today's generation, and weekly virtue
signalling... like an expanded version of the RTD era. Which
means it wouldn't even last sixty years!!!
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw it
saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't have to.
We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying to explain it
away or undo it. Just move forward...
Verily, in article <xn0pporxr1ijjlw004@post.eweka.nl>, did blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The True Melissa wrote:
I left Reddit years ago, I doubt it's got much better. It's
like an idiot magnet.
I think it's worse, actually. I think it's an idiot creator.
At that, it's less damaging than some of the other social
media options.
Upvoting is toxic. People start chasing upvotes without even
intending to do it, because it's human nature. The comments
which garner the most upvotes are quips and aggressive flames
of designated bad guys, and so everyone's trained -- trained,
in the behaviorist sense -- to post low- effort and hostile
stuff.
There are people who sell Reddit accounts with substantial
karma, for real money, so that people with more money than
sense can wear the fake clout until they screw it up.
The ironic lesson is that the people who have the most karma
don't chase it. I have a ludicrous amount of Reddit karma,
over 12k last I checked, and I don't pay a bit of attention to
it.
Usenet's different. It allows hostility and quips because it
allows anything, but there's no mechanism pushing those things
upward. Someone who posted nothing but quips and flames would
probably end up in a lot of killfiles. On Usenet, there's no
way to blame a mysterious algorithm when people start ignoring
us. It's probably still not as good for us as interacting in
real life, but the simpler architecture makes it less toxic,
and we still have the advantage of being able to talk to
people all over the world.
I'd have no problem with them starting again, but that
doesn't mean doing everything exactly the same for the next
sixty years... just taking the general premise and concept
of the show and telling stories about a time travelling
alien based on that.
Even a real reboot probably wouldn't try to refilm the same
stories. It'd probably be as you said -- the same premise,
then going wherever it leads.
The only problem would be, in the current climate it would
just be a woke sci-fi show with a box-ticking cast and
storylines dumbed down for today's generation, and weekly
virtue signalling... like an expanded version of the RTD
era. Which means it wouldn't even last sixty years!!!
I doubt it would last three.
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw
it saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't
have to. We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying
to explain it away or undo it. Just move forward...
If I were the showrunner, that's pretty much what I would do.
I would throw in one small nod to the old fans, to indicate
that they can relax about whatever the issue was.
Do you recall how, in the first Star Trek movie, we were all
told that Kirk now needs reading glasses? There were a few
other touches to show us that the characters had aged. Then,
they decided to go back to just having space adventures and
ignoring the characters' advancing years. They didn't focus
on a retcon, but they did show Kirk coming across the unused
glasses, smirking, and discarding them. Kirk has his old
abilities back, and fans are free to assume he had eye surgery
or pretend the glasses never happened, as they prefer.
I think that's what RTD tried to do in "The Giggle," when the
Toymaker mentions that the Doctor's timeline got mangled. RTD
even indicated that this was intended as a quiet retcon of the
Timeless Child, but it's not good enough for some of us.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/05/2026 05:45, Your Name wrote:
I guess we'll see on Monday if this latest rumour is
true ...
Doctor Who's Future Reportedly Revealed as Reboot
Details Appear Online -a-a
---------------------------------------------------
The future of Doctor Who has been in doubt for months
now,
[Snip]
A surprising new post on Reddit reveals what seems to be
a press release, dated May 11.
I think it's safe to say now that this was all a pack of lies.
It's Reddit!
Who takes anything posted there seriously?!
It's just karma farming... and/or clickbait to get attention.
Although I'm sure the BBC will partner with somebody for future
episodes of Doctor Who, but I don't see them rebooting the show
and going back to the beginning.
On 11/05/2026 10:17 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsg76$136am$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 8:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:I meant his IRL child, but yeah, there's a clone of half of Ten out
Verily, in article <10trefm$qbkk$1@dont-email.me>, didHey, that's right, we still have DoctorDavid's Daughter "Out There" ...
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
the lesbian Jodie Whittaker, the homosexual and transgender David
Tennant, and the effeminate gay cry-baby Ncuti Gatwa
I don't know much about Jodie Whittaker, but I'm pretty sure David
Tennant is neither of those things.
He did transition his child, though. That's probably why he's still
firmly committed to transmania after many started backing away.
so maybe SHE can be roped in .... but, hang on, she doesn't have a TARDIS!! >>
there somewhere.
First adventure ... SHE goes back to Galifrey and pinches another
TARDIS!! The story almost writes itself. ;-P
She's never been to Gallifrey. Someone would have to show her the way.
But she's DoctorDavid's clone daughter or some such so she'd have to
share his knowledge, surely!!
--Sounds like a good job for the Master, just to sow chaos.
Oh, you nasty pastie, who!! ;-P
--
Daniel70
On 11/05/2026 10:27 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:I think the term you might have been looking for, Blueshirt, was "All in
Verily, in article <10tsg76$136am$1@dont-email.me>, did
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 8:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Hey, that's right, we still have DoctorDavid's Daughter "Out
I don't know much about Jodie Whittaker, but I'm pretty
sure David Tennant is neither of those things.
He did transition his child, though. That's probably why
he's still firmly committed to transmania after many
started backing away.
There" ... so maybe SHE can be roped in .... but, hang on,
she doesn't have a TARDIS!!
I meant his IRL child, but yeah, there's a clone of half of
Ten out there somewhere.
Give it time and I'm sure his real children will be in "Doctor
Who" one day... a couple of them are actors and they have
"Doctor Who" in their DNA, so why not?
It sounds fun to me! The Doctor, his in-universe daughter -
that's now his real life wife, with their children playing parts
in a show that their Grandad was also in... Talk about keep it
in the family!
the Family" .... https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066626/?ref_=fn_t_1
----
Daniel70
On 11/05/2026 10:14 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsful$133nm$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47To which I have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER!! I've seen it on T.V. so IT IS >CANON!!
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that version still
implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
----
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 11/05/2026 10:17 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsg76$136am$1@dont-email.me>, did
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Hey, that's right, we still have DoctorDavid's Daughter
"Out There" ... so maybe SHE can be roped in .... but,
hang on, she doesn't have a TARDIS!!
First adventure ... SHE goes back to Galifrey and pinches
another TARDIS!! The story almost writes itself. ;-P
She's never been to Gallifrey. Someone would have to show
her the way.
But she's DoctorDavid's clone daughter or some such so
she'd have to share his knowledge, surely!!
For a clone she didn't look anything like him!
Just as well, as who would want to marry somebody that looks
exactly the same as them? ;-)
Daniel70 wrote:
I think the term you might have been looking for,
Blueshirt, was "All in the Family" ....
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066626/?ref_=fn_t_1
Never heard of it!
Verily, in article <xn0pponef1cep5r000@post.eweka.nl>, did >blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/05/2026 05:45, Your Name wrote:
I guess we'll see on Monday if this latest rumour is
true ...
Doctor Who's Future Reportedly Revealed as Reboot
Details Appear Online aa
---------------------------------------------------
The future of Doctor Who has been in doubt for months
now,
[Snip]
A surprising new post on Reddit reveals what seems to be
a press release, dated May 11.
I think it's safe to say now that this was all a pack of lies.
It's Reddit!
Who takes anything posted there seriously?!
It's just karma farming... and/or clickbait to get attention.
People do post official releases there, though.
Although I'm sure the BBC will partner with somebody for future
episodes of Doctor Who, but I don't see them rebooting the show
and going back to the beginning.
Me neither. I think the correct theory is that nobody knows what
"reboot" means now. They're probably just going to "reboot" with a new >Doctor and *maybe* -- we can hope -- a sensible vision for the show.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <10tuubd$1sfj7$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 >@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 10:17 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsg76$136am$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 8:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10trefm$qbkk$1@dont-email.me>, didHey, that's right, we still have DoctorDavid's Daughter "Out There" ... >> >> so maybe SHE can be roped in .... but, hang on, she doesn't have a TARDIS!!
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
the lesbian Jodie Whittaker, the homosexual and transgender David
Tennant, and the effeminate gay cry-baby Ncuti Gatwa
I don't know much about Jodie Whittaker, but I'm pretty sure David
Tennant is neither of those things.
He did transition his child, though. That's probably why he's still
firmly committed to transmania after many started backing away.
I meant his IRL child, but yeah, there's a clone of half of Ten out
there somewhere.
First adventure ... SHE goes back to Galifrey and pinches another
TARDIS!! The story almost writes itself. ;-P
She's never been to Gallifrey. Someone would have to show her the way.
But she's DoctorDavid's clone daughter or some such so she'd have to
share his knowledge, surely!!
I don't think that was Invisible Enemy cloning. If it were, she would
have looked like the Doctor and gone poof shortly.
Then again, she was instantly grown. Standard clones from our era have
to gestate and mature.
Cloning: It does whatever the writers want!
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pponef1cep5r000@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/05/2026 05:45, Your Name wrote:
A surprising new post on Reddit reveals what seems
to be a press release, dated May 11.
I think it's safe to say now that this was all a pack
of lies.
It's Reddit!
Who the fuck takes anything posted there seriously?!
It's just karma farming... and/or clickbait to get attention.
People do post official releases there, though.
They also make a lot of stuff up.
I left Reddit years ago, I doubt it's got much better. It's
like an idiot magnet.
Although I'm sure the BBC will partner with somebody for
future episodes of Doctor Who, but I don't see them
rebooting the show and going back to the beginning.
Me neither. I think the correct theory is that nobody knows
what "reboot" means now. They're probably just going to
"reboot" with a new Doctor and maybe -- we can hope -- a
sensible vision for the show.
I'd have no problem with them starting again, but that doesn't
mean doing everything exactly the same for the next sixty
years... just taking the general premise and concept of the
show and telling stories about a time travelling alien based
on that.
The only problem would be, in the current climate it would just
be a woke sci-fi show with a box-ticking cast and storylines
dumbed down for today's generation, and weekly virtue
signalling... like an expanded version of the RTD era. Which
means it wouldn't even last sixty years!!!
Verily, in article <10tuuoe$1sh55$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 >@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 10:14 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsful$133nm$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47To which I have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER!! I've seen it on T.V. so IT IS
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that version still
implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
CANON!!
I saw "The Curse of Fatal Death" on TV, too. :-\
I suppose I must regretfully agree that Whittaker is currently in canon,
but if we're retconning, we can fix that.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tuuoe$1sh55$2@dont-email.me>, did
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 10:14 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
To which I have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER!! I've seen it on
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that
version still implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
T.V. so IT IS CANON!!
I saw "The Curse of Fatal Death" on TV, too. :-\
I suppose I must regretfully agree that Whittaker is currently
in canon, but if we're retconning, we can fix that.
Retconning won't change the female Doctor from happening in the
show though will it? I mean, I have a couple of the Blu-rays on
my shelf, so unless you are physically coming round to remove
them, those stories will still exist as part of Doctor Who...
they won't just vanish into thin air. Therefore, the 13th Doctor
will still exist.
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw it
saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't have to.
We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying to explain it
away or undo it. Just move forward...
Verily, in article <xn0pporxr1ijjlw004@post.eweka.nl>, did >blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The True Melissa wrote:
I left Reddit years ago, I doubt it's got much better. It's
like an idiot magnet.
I think it's worse, actually. I think it's an idiot *creator*. At that,
it's less damaging than some of the other social media options.
Upvoting is toxic. People start chasing upvotes without even intending
to do it, because it's human nature. The comments which garner the most >upvotes are quips and aggressive flames of designated bad guys, and so >everyone's trained -- trained, in the behaviorist sense -- to post low- >effort and hostile stuff.
There are people who *sell* Reddit accounts with substantial karma, for
real money, so that people with more money than sense can wear the fake >clout until they screw it up.
The ironic lesson is that the people who have the most karma don't chase
it. I have a ludicrous amount of Reddit karma, over 12k last I checked,
and I don't pay a bit of attention to it.
Usenet's different. It allows hostility and quips because it allows >anything, but there's no mechanism pushing those things upward. Someone
who posted nothing but quips and flames would probably end up in a lot
of killfiles. On Usenet, there's no way to blame a mysterious algorithm
when people start ignoring us. It's probably still not as good for us as >interacting in real life, but the simpler architecture makes it less
toxic, and we still have the advantage of being able to talk to people
all over the world.
I'd have no problem with them starting again, but that doesn't
mean doing everything exactly the same for the next sixty
years... just taking the general premise and concept of the
show and telling stories about a time travelling alien based
on that.
Even a real reboot probably wouldn't try to refilm the same stories.
It'd probably be as you said -- the same premise, then going wherever it >leads.
The only problem would be, in the current climate it would just
be a woke sci-fi show with a box-ticking cast and storylines
dumbed down for today's generation, and weekly virtue
signalling... like an expanded version of the RTD era. Which
means it wouldn't even last sixty years!!!
I doubt it would last three.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did >blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw it
saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't have to.
We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying to explain it
away or undo it. Just move forward...
If I were the showrunner, that's pretty much what I would do. I would
throw in one small nod to the old fans, to indicate that they can relax >about whatever the issue was.
Do you recall how, in the first Star Trek movie, we were all told that
Kirk now needs reading glasses? There were a few other touches to show
us that the characters had aged. Then, they decided to go back to just >having space adventures and ignoring the characters' advancing years.
They didn't focus on a retcon, but they did show Kirk coming across the >unused glasses, smirking, and discarding them. Kirk has his old
abilities back, and fans are free to assume he had eye surgery or
pretend the glasses never happened, as they prefer.
I think that's what RTD tried to do in "The Giggle," when the Toymaker >mentions that the Doctor's timeline got mangled. RTD even indicated that >this was intended as a quiet retcon of the Timeless Child, but it's not
good enough for some of us.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pporxr1ijjlw004@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The True Melissa wrote:
I left Reddit years ago, I doubt it's got much better. It's
like an idiot magnet.
I think it's worse, actually. I think it's an idiot creator.
At that, it's less damaging than some of the other social
media options.
Upvoting is toxic. People start chasing upvotes without even
intending to do it, because it's human nature. The comments
which garner the most upvotes are quips and aggressive flames
of designated bad guys, and so everyone's trained -- trained,
in the behaviorist sense -- to post low- effort and hostile
stuff.
On Reddit every Tom, Dick or Harry seems to be hostile!
There are people who sell Reddit accounts with substantial
karma, for real money, so that people with more money than
sense can wear the fake clout until they screw it up.
The ironic lesson is that the people who have the most karma
don't chase it. I have a ludicrous amount of Reddit karma,
over 12k last I checked, and I don't pay a bit of attention to
it.
I had around 9.5k karma when I left... and I never chased it...
in some cases some of my sarcastic/funny comments were more
entertaining than I thought and people went crazy upvoting...
<shrugs>
The biggest problem I came across on Reddit was when I posted
something factual about something I actually knew, idiots came
along and downvoted it!
Usenet's different. It allows hostility and quips because it
allows anything, but there's no mechanism pushing those things
upward. Someone who posted nothing but quips and flames would
probably end up in a lot of killfiles. On Usenet, there's no
way to blame a mysterious algorithm when people start ignoring
us. It's probably still not as good for us as interacting in
real life, but the simpler architecture makes it less toxic,
and we still have the advantage of being able to talk to
people all over the world.
I love that bit... we're a diverse bunch of people from a
variety of different backgrounds... but whether we post once a
day or fifty times a day, we're all equal here.
Unfortunately, being from all over the world means we can't
have an RADW meet-up and watch Doctor Who whilst eating Hot
Cross buns together... :(
... and admire your glittery TARDIS hairclip!
I'd have no problem with them starting again, but that
doesn't mean doing everything exactly the same for the next
sixty years... just taking the general premise and concept
of the show and telling stories about a time travelling
alien based on that.
Even a real reboot probably wouldn't try to refilm the same
stories. It'd probably be as you said -- the same premise,
then going wherever it leads.
You couldn't.
Been there, seen that. It would just become boring.
The only problem would be, in the current climate it would
just be a woke sci-fi show with a box-ticking cast and
storylines dumbed down for today's generation, and weekly
virtue signalling... like an expanded version of the RTD
era. Which means it wouldn't even last sixty years!!!
I doubt it would last three.
I meant to say six but got carried away.
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw
it saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't
have to. We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying
to explain it away or undo it. Just move forward...
If I were the showrunner, that's pretty much what I would do.
I would throw in one small nod to the old fans, to indicate
that they can relax about whatever the issue was.
The problem I have with a retcon of the 13th Doctor is where do
you stop? If you want to wipe out a female Doctor you'll also
have to wipe-out a female Master (Missy) and then The General,
etc. etc. It'd be like pulling on a loose thread... before you
knew it you'd have no sweater left!
Plus, some claim it's not actually the female Doctor per se,
just the 'Timeless Child' storyline, which is a bit disingenious
judging by the fact the same people that say that here were
against Jodie Whittaker from the day she was cast as The
Doctor... and their posts still exist in the RADW archive to
prove it.
So how do you please everyone? Simple answer, you can't! So why
bother trying. Just move on...
If people have hang-ups, they'll just have to get over them.
RADW offers a good counselling service for those affected...
Do you recall how, in the first Star Trek movie, we were all
told that Kirk now needs reading glasses? There were a few
other touches to show us that the characters had aged. Then,
they decided to go back to just having space adventures and
ignoring the characters' advancing years. They didn't focus
on a retcon, but they did show Kirk coming across the unused
glasses, smirking, and discarding them. Kirk has his old
abilities back, and fans are free to assume he had eye surgery
or pretend the glasses never happened, as they prefer.
I think that's what RTD tried to do in "The Giggle," when the
Toymaker mentions that the Doctor's timeline got mangled. RTD
even indicated that this was intended as a quiet retcon of the
Timeless Child, but it's not good enough for some of us.
RTD brought Jodie Whittaker into a Ncuti Gatwa episode as the
13th Doctor in 2025, so it must have been a very quiet retcon in
2023 if she's still walking around the TARDIS in Season 2/15!
In article
<MPG.446ce58fc84a589d989e70@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
I think that's what RTD tried to do in "The Giggle," when
the Toymaker mentions that the Doctor's timeline got
mangled. RTD even indicated that this was intended as a
quiet retcon of the Timeless Child, but it's not good enough
for some of us.
Then RTD doubled down on the Timeless Child in the 15th Doc
Era.
Verily, in article <xn0ppov8n1n181x000@post.eweka.nl>, did blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The biggest problem I came across on Reddit was when I posted
something factual about something I actually knew, idiots
came along and downvoted it!
Oh, that's so aggravating. There are particular myths Reddit
loves.
One I heard a lot was "If your spouse is abusive, change the
locks while he's out." This is terrible advice. It will only
work on a helpless person, and if he's helpless, there's no
need. A non-helpless person will simply break a window --
which he has every right to do, to reenter his own home -- or
leave briefly, then return with a locksmith and/or the police.
If he's dangerous, she could pay a pretty high price for that
little stunt. If he isn't, she just put herself into a
terrible position for divorce court. Judges don't look kindly
on those who try to sieze marital assets, including the house.
Reddit won't hear of it, though. They like the idea of
dramatically locking him out, and the reality just isn't
interesting -- after all, they're not the ones who'll have to
live through it.
/r/legaladvice dispenses so much bad legal advice that there's
a separate sub, /r/badlegaladvice, to make fun of it. Everyone
there is allegedly verified as either a lawyer or an LEO, and
it's still filled with misinformation and craziness.
The biggest problem I came across on Reddit was when I posted
something factual about something I actually knew, idiots came
along and downvoted it!
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The problem I have with a retcon of the 13th Doctor is where do
you stop? If you want to wipe out a female Doctor you'll also
have to wipe-out a female Master (Missy)
and then The General,
Plus, some claim it's not actually the female Doctor per se,
just the 'Timeless Child' storyline,
So how do you please everyone? Simple answer, you can't! So why
bother trying. Just move on...
I think that's what RTD tried to do in "The Giggle," when the
Toymaker mentions that the Doctor's timeline got mangled. RTD
even indicated that this was intended as a quiet retcon of the
Timeless Child, but it's not good enough for some of us.
RTD brought Jodie Whittaker into a Ncuti Gatwa episode as the
13th Doctor in 2025, so it must have been a very quiet retcon in
2023 if she's still walking around the TARDIS in Season 2/15!
Deliberately to piss people like you off I'd say.
In fact, with cameos from Jodie Whittaker's Doctor and The
Fugitive Doctor in some Ncuti Gatwa episodes RTD basically
tripled down on it! I mean. he could have just not used those
characters again in the show, but he chose to do so.
There certainly was no retcon anyway, quiet or otherwise!
Verily, in article <xn0ppovh91ndrmf001@post.eweka.nl>, did blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
and then The General,
I think I missed this character. How is the General linked
to the Doctor turning into a woman?
Plus, some claim it's not actually the female Doctor per se,
just the 'Timeless Child' storyline,
I'd nuke both.
So how do you please everyone? Simple answer, you can't!
So why bother trying. Just move on...
That's also fine, if it can be done. I think one of the
reasons people are struggling with it is that they aren't
giving us any new good stories. There was a ton of preachy
crap, followed by a long silence.
If the Christmas special is a rollicking adventure in the
classic style, with no tedious lectures and no LGBT themes and
no misandry and so forth, it could go a long way toward
quieting some of the complaints.
I think that's what RTD tried to do in "The Giggle," when
the Toymaker mentions that the Doctor's timeline got
mangled. RTD even indicated that this was intended as a
quiet retcon of the Timeless Child, but it's not good
enough for some of us.
RTD brought Jodie Whittaker into a Ncuti Gatwa episode as the
13th Doctor in 2025, so it must have been a very quiet
retcon in 2023 if she's still walking around the TARDIS in
Season 2/15!
As you mentioned earlier, retconning the Timeless Child and
retconning her era aren't the same thing.
Verily, in article <xn0ppov8n1n181x000@post.eweka.nl>, did >blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The biggest problem I came across on Reddit was when I posted
something factual about something I actually knew, idiots came
along and downvoted it!
Oh, that's so aggravating. There are particular myths Reddit loves.
One I heard a lot was "If your spouse is abusive, change the locks while >he's out." This is terrible advice. It will only work on a helpless
person, and if he's helpless, there's no need. A non-helpless person
will simply break a window -- which he has every right to do, to reenter
his own home -- or leave briefly, then return with a locksmith and/or
the police.
If he's dangerous, she could pay a pretty high price for that little
stunt. If he isn't, she just put herself into a terrible position for >divorce court. Judges don't look kindly on those who try to sieze
marital assets, including the house. Reddit won't hear of it, though.
They like the idea of dramatically locking him out, and the reality just >isn't interesting -- after all, they're not the ones who'll have to live >through it.
/r/legaladvice dispenses so much bad legal advice that there's a
separate sub, /r/badlegaladvice, to make fun of it. Everyone there is >allegedly verified as either a lawyer or an LEO, and it's still filled
with misinformation and craziness.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article
<xn0ppowyt1pe0x5000@news.eternal-september.org>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
Deliberately to piss people like you off I'd say.
In fact, with cameos from Jodie Whittaker's Doctor and The
Fugitive Doctor in some Ncuti Gatwa episodes RTD basically
tripled down on it! I mean. he could have just not used those
characters again in the show, but he chose to do so.
There certainly was no retcon anyway, quiet or otherwise!
Yeah, I agree. Nobody's happy, so he's just giving the fans
the finger. I suppose he has enough money at this point.
Personally, I think RTD takes great delight in antagonising the
fans... especially the ones that don't agree with his world
view. He doesn't seem to be producing the show for the masses,
just a select minority.
Verily, in article <xn0ppoxua1qnlx3001@post.eweka.nl>, did blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
Personally, I think RTD takes great delight in antagonising
the fans... especially the ones that don't agree with his
world view. He doesn't seem to be producing the show for the
masses, just a select minority.
He told the viewers to turn it off if they didn't like it,
then called them all bigots when they did.
During his first tenure, the BBC supervised him more closely.
Too bad they gave him more rein this time.
The General was a Time Lord that changed their gender upon
regenerating in "The Time of the Doctor"... after being shot
by the 12th Doctor... The General went from a white male to a
black female, and we saw the regeneration happen on screen.
The Doctor wrote:
In article
<MPG.446ce58fc84a589d989e70@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
I think that's what RTD tried to do in "The Giggle," when
the Toymaker mentions that the Doctor's timeline got
mangled. RTD even indicated that this was intended as a
quiet retcon of the Timeless Child, but it's not good enough
for some of us.
Then RTD doubled down on the Timeless Child in the 15th Doc
Era.
Deliberately to piss people like you off I'd say.
In fact, with cameos from Jodie Whittaker's Doctor and The
Fugitive Doctor in some Ncuti Gatwa episodes RTD basically
tripled down on it! I mean. he could have just not used those
characters again in the show, but he chose to do so.
There certainly was no retcon anyway, quiet or otherwise!
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0ppov8n1n181x000@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The biggest problem I came across on Reddit was when I posted
something factual about something I actually knew, idiots
came along and downvoted it!
Oh, that's so aggravating. There are particular myths Reddit
loves.
Definitely!
One I heard a lot was "If your spouse is abusive, change the
locks while he's out." This is terrible advice. It will only
work on a helpless person, and if he's helpless, there's no
need. A non-helpless person will simply break a window --
which he has every right to do, to reenter his own home -- or
leave briefly, then return with a locksmith and/or the police.
If he's dangerous, she could pay a pretty high price for that
little stunt. If he isn't, she just put herself into a
terrible position for divorce court. Judges don't look kindly
on those who try to sieze marital assets, including the house.
Reddit won't hear of it, though. They like the idea of
dramatically locking him out, and the reality just isn't
interesting -- after all, they're not the ones who'll have to
live through it.
Well... my area of expertise wasn't in that area thankfully. I
have no experience of that sort of thing.
/r/legaladvice dispenses so much bad legal advice that there's
a separate sub, /r/badlegaladvice, to make fun of it. Everyone
there is allegedly verified as either a lawyer or an LEO, and
it's still filled with misinformation and craziness.
People seek legal advice from the internet?!
I suppose they do these days. Of course now, they probably just
ask Chat-GPT
Verily, in article <xn0ppovh91ndrmf001@post.eweka.nl>, did >blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The problem I have with a retcon of the 13th Doctor is where do
you stop? If you want to wipe out a female Doctor you'll also
have to wipe-out a female Master (Missy)
Works for me.
and then The General,
I think I missed this character. How is the General linked to the Doctor >turning into a woman?
Plus, some claim it's not actually the female Doctor per se,
just the 'Timeless Child' storyline,
I'd nuke both.
So how do you please everyone? Simple answer, you can't! So why
bother trying. Just move on...
That's also fine, if it can be done. I think one of the reasons people
are struggling with it is that they aren't giving us any new *good*
stories. There was a ton of preachy crap, followed by a long silence.
If the Christmas special is a rollicking adventure in the classic style, >with no tedious lectures and no LGBT themes and no misandry and so
forth, it could go a long way toward quieting some of the complaints.
I think that's what RTD tried to do in "The Giggle," when the
Toymaker mentions that the Doctor's timeline got mangled. RTD
even indicated that this was intended as a quiet retcon of the
Timeless Child, but it's not good enough for some of us.
RTD brought Jodie Whittaker into a Ncuti Gatwa episode as the
13th Doctor in 2025, so it must have been a very quiet retcon in
2023 if she's still walking around the TARDIS in Season 2/15!
As you mentioned earlier, retconning the Timeless Child and retconning
her era aren't the same thing.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <xn0ppowyt1pe0x5000@news.eternal-september.org>, did >blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
Deliberately to piss people like you off I'd say.
In fact, with cameos from Jodie Whittaker's Doctor and The
Fugitive Doctor in some Ncuti Gatwa episodes RTD basically
tripled down on it! I mean. he could have just not used those
characters again in the show, but he chose to do so.
There certainly was no retcon anyway, quiet or otherwise!
Yeah, I agree. Nobody's happy, so he's just giving the fans the finger.
I suppose he has enough money at this point.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0ppovh91ndrmf001@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
and then The General,
I think I missed this character. How is the General linked
to the Doctor turning into a woman?
The General was a Time Lord that changed their gender upon
regenerating in "The Time of the Doctor"... after being shot
by the 12th Doctor... The General went from a white male to a
black female, and we saw the regeneration happen on screen.
Plus, some claim it's not actually the female Doctor per se,
just the 'Timeless Child' storyline,
I'd nuke both.
I'm happy to ignore the bits I don't like.
So how do you please everyone? Simple answer, you can't!
So why bother trying. Just move on...
That's also fine, if it can be done. I think one of the
reasons people are struggling with it is that they aren't
giving us any new good stories. There was a ton of preachy
crap, followed by a long silence.
If the Christmas special is a rollicking adventure in the
classic style, with no tedious lectures and no LGBT themes and
no misandry and so forth, it could go a long way toward
quieting some of the complaints.
I'd like to think so, but RTD is writing and producing it...
I think that's what RTD tried to do in "The Giggle," when
the Toymaker mentions that the Doctor's timeline got
mangled. RTD even indicated that this was intended as a
quiet retcon of the Timeless Child, but it's not good
enough for some of us.
RTD brought Jodie Whittaker into a Ncuti Gatwa episode as the
13th Doctor in 2025, so it must have been a very quiet
retcon in 2023 if she's still walking around the TARDIS in
Season 2/15!
As you mentioned earlier, retconning the Timeless Child and
retconning her era aren't the same thing.
But RTD also brought The Fugitive Doctor back into a Ncuti Gatwa
episode... and she is part of the Timeless Child storyline!
That's why anyone saying that RTD did a quiet retcon doesn't
make sense, as he did anything but during Ncuti's era. RTD
could have left it all alone and people might have forgotten
about it... but he chose not to.
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article
<xn0ppowyt1pe0x5000@news.eternal-september.org>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
Deliberately to piss people like you off I'd say.
In fact, with cameos from Jodie Whittaker's Doctor and The
Fugitive Doctor in some Ncuti Gatwa episodes RTD basically
tripled down on it! I mean. he could have just not used those
characters again in the show, but he chose to do so.
There certainly was no retcon anyway, quiet or otherwise!
Yeah, I agree. Nobody's happy, so he's just giving the fans
the finger. I suppose he has enough money at this point.
Personally, I think RTD takes great delight in antagonising the
fans... especially the ones that don't agree with his world
view. He doesn't seem to be producing the show for the masses,
just a select minority.
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0ppoxua1qnlx3001@post.eweka.nl>, did blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
Personally, I think RTD takes great delight in antagonising
the fans... especially the ones that don't agree with his
world view. He doesn't seem to be producing the show for
the masses, just a select minority.
He told the viewers to turn it off if they didn't like it,
then called them all bigots when they did.
That's why I think bringing Jo Martin back in a Ncuti Gatwa
episode was just done as a 'Fuck You' to the fans that were
against the 'Timeless Child'. "It's my show, take that!!!"
Verily, in article <xn0ppoxua1qnlx3001@post.eweka.nl>, did >blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
Personally, I think RTD takes great delight in antagonising the
fans... especially the ones that don't agree with his world
view. He doesn't seem to be producing the show for the masses,
just a select minority.
He told the viewers to turn it off if they didn't like it, then called
them all bigots when they did.
During his first tenure, the BBC supervised him more closely. Too bad
they gave him more rein this time.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0ppoxua1qnlx3001@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
Personally, I think RTD takes great delight in antagonising
the fans... especially the ones that don't agree with his
world view. He doesn't seem to be producing the show for the
masses, just a select minority.
He told the viewers to turn it off if they didn't like it,
then called them all bigots when they did.
That's why I think bringing Jo Martin back in a Ncuti Gatwa
episode was just done as a 'F*k You' to the fans that were
against the 'Timeless Child'. "It's my show, take that!!!"
During his first tenure, the BBC supervised him more closely.
Too bad they gave him more rein this time.
RTD was a bigger name in the industry when he returned to the
show in 2023... with a bigger ego too.
Touch Grass RTD!
Blueshirt wrote:
The General was a Time Lord that changed their gender upon
regenerating in "The Time of the Doctor"... after being shot
by the 12th Doctor... The General went from a white male to a
black female, and we saw the regeneration happen on screen.
It was actually in "Hell Bent" that The General regenerated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93nJQj2Z97M
Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0ppoxua1qnlx3001@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
Personally, I think RTD takes great delight in antagonising
the fans... especially the ones that don't agree with his
world view. He doesn't seem to be producing the show for
the masses, just a select minority.
He told the viewers to turn it off if they didn't like it,
then called them all bigots when they did.
That's why I think bringing Jo Martin back in a Ncuti Gatwa
episode was just done as a 'Fuck You' to the fans that were
against the 'Timeless Child'. "It's my show, take that!!!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPEDA7BjE7Q
The Doctor wrote:
Touch Grass RTD!
Ncuti Gatwa said that, not RTD.
On 11/05/2026 10:14 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsful$133nm$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47To which I have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER!! I've seen it on T.V. so IT IS CANON!!
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that version still
implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tuuoe$1sh55$2@dont-email.me>, did
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 10:14 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
To which I have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER!! I've seen it on
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that
version still implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
T.V. so IT IS CANON!!
I saw "The Curse of Fatal Death" on TV, too. :-\
I suppose I must regretfully agree that Whittaker is currently
in canon, but if we're retconning, we can fix that.
Retconning won't change the female Doctor from happening in the
show though will it? I mean, I have a couple of the Blu-rays on
my shelf, so unless you are physically coming round to remove
them, those stories will still exist as part of Doctor Who...
they won't just vanish into thin air. Therefore, the 13th Doctor
will still exist.
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw it
saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't have to.
We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying to explain it
away or undo it. Just move forward...
That's why I think bringing Jo Martin back in a Ncuti Gatwa
episode was just done as a 'Fuck You' to the fans that were
against the 'Timeless Child'. "It's my show, take that!!!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPEDA7BjE7Q
Blueshirt wrote:
The General was a Time Lord that changed their gender upon
regenerating in "The Time of the Doctor"... after being shot
by the 12th Doctor... The General went from a white male to a
black female, and we saw the regeneration happen on screen.
It was actually in "Hell Bent" that The General regenerated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93nJQj2Z97M
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw it
saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't have to.
We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying to explain it
away or undo it. Just move forward...
If I were the showrunner, that's pretty much what I would do. I would
throw in one small nod to the old fans, to indicate that they can relax
about whatever the issue was.
Do you recall how, in the first Star Trek movie, we were all told that
Kirk now needs reading glasses? There were a few other touches to show
us that the characters had aged. Then, they decided to go back to just
having space adventures and ignoring the characters' advancing years.
They didn't focus on a retcon, but they did show Kirk coming across the unused glasses, smirking, and discarding them. Kirk has his old
abilities back, and fans are free to assume he had eye surgery or
pretend the glasses never happened, as they prefer.
I think that's what RTD tried to do in "The Giggle," when the Toymaker mentions that the Doctor's timeline got mangled. RTD even indicated that
this was intended as a quiet retcon of the Timeless Child, but it's not
good enough for some of us.
The 13th Doctor was actually Matt Smith.
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw
it saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't
have to. We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying
to explain it away or undo it. Just move forward...
If I were the showrunner, that's pretty much what I would do.
I would throw in one small nod to the old fans, to indicate
that they can relax about whatever the issue was.
The problem I have with a retcon of the 13th Doctor is where do
you stop? If you want to wipe out a female Doctor you'll also
have to wipe-out a female Master (Missy) and then The General,
etc. etc. It'd be like pulling on a loose thread... before you
knew it you'd have no sweater left!
Plus, some claim it's not actually the female Doctor per se,
just the 'Timeless Child' storyline, which is a bit disingenious
judging by the fact the same people that say that here were
against Jodie Whittaker from the day she was cast as The
Doctor... and their posts still exist in the RADW archive to
prove it.
So how do you please everyone? Simple answer, you can't! So why
bother trying. Just move on...
If people have hang-ups, they'll just have to get over them.
RADW offers a good counselling service for those affected...
Do you recall how, in the first Star Trek movie, we were all
told that Kirk now needs reading glasses? There were a few
other touches to show us that the characters had aged. Then,
they decided to go back to just having space adventures and
ignoring the characters' advancing years. They didn't focus
on a retcon, but they did show Kirk coming across the unused
glasses, smirking, and discarding them. Kirk has his old
abilities back, and fans are free to assume he had eye surgery
or pretend the glasses never happened, as they prefer.
I think that's what RTD tried to do in "The Giggle," when the
Toymaker mentions that the Doctor's timeline got mangled. RTD
even indicated that this was intended as a quiet retcon of the
Timeless Child, but it's not good enough for some of us.
RTD brought Jodie Whittaker into a Ncuti Gatwa episode as the
13th Doctor in 2025, so it must have been a very quiet retcon in
2023 if she's still walking around the TARDIS in Season 2/15!
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0ppovh91ndrmf001@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
and then The General,
I think I missed this character. How is the General linked
to the Doctor turning into a woman?
The General was a Time Lord that changed their gender upon
regenerating in "The Time of the Doctor"... after being shot
by the 12th Doctor... The General went from a white male to a
black female, and we saw the regeneration happen on screen.
Plus, some claim it's not actually the female Doctor per se,
just the 'Timeless Child' storyline,
I'd nuke both.
I'm happy to ignore the bits I don't like.
So how do you please everyone? Simple answer, you can't!
So why bother trying. Just move on...
That's also fine, if it can be done. I think one of the
reasons people are struggling with it is that they aren't
giving us any new good stories. There was a ton of preachy
crap, followed by a long silence.
If the Christmas special is a rollicking adventure in the
classic style, with no tedious lectures and no LGBT themes and
no misandry and so forth, it could go a long way toward
quieting some of the complaints.
I'd like to think so, but RTD is writing and producing it...
I think that's what RTD tried to do in "The Giggle," when
the Toymaker mentions that the Doctor's timeline got
mangled. RTD even indicated that this was intended as a
quiet retcon of the Timeless Child, but it's not good
enough for some of us.
RTD brought Jodie Whittaker into a Ncuti Gatwa episode as the
13th Doctor in 2025, so it must have been a very quiet
retcon in 2023 if she's still walking around the TARDIS in
Season 2/15!
As you mentioned earlier, retconning the Timeless Child and
retconning her era aren't the same thing.
But RTD also brought The Fugitive Doctor back into a Ncuti Gatwa
episode... and she is part of the Timeless Child storyline!
That's why anyone saying that RTD did a quiet retcon doesn't
make sense, as he did anything but during Ncuti's era. RTD
could have left it all alone and people might have forgotten
about it... but he chose not to.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/05/2026 05:45, Your Name wrote:
I guess we'll see on Monday if this latest rumour is
true ...
Doctor Who's Future Reportedly Revealed as Reboot
Details Appear Online
---------------------------------------------------
The future of Doctor Who has been in doubt for months
now,
[Snip]
A surprising new post on Reddit reveals what seems to be
a press release, dated May 11.
I think it's safe to say now that this was all a pack of lies.
It's Reddit!
Who the fuck takes anything posted there seriously?!
It's just karma farming... and/or clickbait to get attention.
Although I'm sure the BBC will partner with somebody for future
episodes of Doctor Who, but I don't see them rebooting the show
and going back to the beginning.
Verily, in article <10tvmcp$245a8$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
The 13th Doctor was actually Matt Smith.
Okay, you're counting the War Doctor, I suppose... but I'm pretty sure
you're not counting the woman they inserted. Who's the other one? The
Hand Doctor? He was human, though, or at least he said he was.
Daniel70 wrote:
I think the term you might have been looking for,
Blueshirt, was "All in the Family" ....
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066626/?ref_=fn_t_1
Never heard of it!
On 2026-05-12 10:22:39 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Daniel70 wrote:
I think the term you might have been looking for,
Blueshirt, was "All in the Family" ....
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066626/?ref_=fn_t_1
Never heard of it!
It's a bad, barely recognisable US version of the UK series "Till Death
Us Do Part". The UK version lasted longer and, as usual, was much
better. :-)
<https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060035/>
Verily, in article <10u0fpq$2bj1k$1@dont-email.me>, did
YourName@YourISP.com deliver unto us this message:
On 2026-05-12 10:22:39 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Daniel70 wrote:
I think the term you might have been looking for,
Blueshirt, was "All in the Family" ....
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066626/?ref_=fn_t_1
Never heard of it!
It's a bad, barely recognisable US version of the UK series "Till Death
Us Do Part". The UK version lasted longer and, as usual, was much
better. :-)
<https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060035/>
The US didn't think it was bad. It ran for years and is still beloved.
On 12/05/2026 11:17, Daniel70 wrote:
On 11/05/2026 10:14 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsful$133nm$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47To which I have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER!! I've seen it on T.V. so IT IS
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that version still
implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
CANON!!
You mean like Bobby Ewing being murdered and Sue Ellen being blown out
of JR's office window at the top of the Ewing Building? It's not canon.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 12/05/2026 12:31, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tuuoe$1sh55$2@dont-email.me>, did
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 10:14 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
To which I have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER!! I've seen it on
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that
version still implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
T.V. so IT IS CANON!!
I saw "The Curse of Fatal Death" on TV, too. :-\
I suppose I must regretfully agree that Whittaker is currently
in canon, but if we're retconning, we can fix that.
Retconning won't change the female Doctor from happening in the
show though will it? I mean, I have a couple of the Blu-rays on
my shelf, so unless you are physically coming round to remove
them, those stories will still exist as part of Doctor Who...
They are degenerate fan fic. Fan fic is not canon or part of Doctor Who.
You should exchange those Blu-Ray's for the lost stories from the
Hartnell and Pertwee eras. In fact the BBC should come to an agreement >stating that if it erased every single Whittaker,
Gay-Transgender-Tennant, and cry-baby Gatwa episode it can have one
missing classic series episode in return.
they won't just vanish into thin air. Therefore, the 13th Doctor
will still exist.
The 13th Doctor was actually Matt Smith.
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw it
saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't have to.
We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying to explain it
away or undo it. Just move forward...
It's gone to far to be retconned. It has to be completely erased without >even mentioning it just like they did with Dallas after they killed off >Bobby Ewing. This is the only solution. Clara or someone else wakes up
from a bad dream hearing baby Orson crying (hence the hellucination of >cry-baby Gatwa) as Danny Pink walks out of the shower and the TARDIS >materialises with the Doctor emerging and shows her the home videos he
just made on Gallifry will all the members of his family.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <xn0ppoz2x1sb1ip000@post.eweka.nl>, did >blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why I think bringing Jo Martin back in a Ncuti Gatwa
episode was just done as a 'Fuck You' to the fans that were
against the 'Timeless Child'. "It's my show, take that!!!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPEDA7BjE7Q
Good grief. Interpersonal drama. So tedious. I don't mind personal notes
-- the characters are people with backstories -- but when emotions are
the center of the show, that gets old.
Doctor Who used to give me both fun adventures and food for thought. At
this point, I'd take either.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <xn0ppoyyf1s4jgx000@post.eweka.nl>, did >blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
Blueshirt wrote:
The General was a Time Lord that changed their gender upon
regenerating in "The Time of the Doctor"... after being shot
by the 12th Doctor... The General went from a white male to a
black female, and we saw the regeneration happen on screen.
It was actually in "Hell Bent" that The General regenerated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93nJQj2Z97M
I did watch "Hell Bent," but I guess I spaced on that bit.
I mostly watched it because it was billed as a bundle with "Heaven
Sent." "Heaven Sent" was phenomenal. Unfortunately, "Hell Bent" didn't
live up to it (IMO).
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 12/05/2026 13:22, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw it
saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't have to.
We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying to explain it
away or undo it. Just move forward...
If I were the showrunner, that's pretty much what I would do. I would
throw in one small nod to the old fans, to indicate that they can relax
about whatever the issue was.
Turning the Doctor into the Timeless Child monster, turning the Cybermen >into Time Lords, having UNIT founded by an alien snake monster, and most
of all turning the Doctor into a rampant, bulling, promiscuous, sexually >sexually harassing, effeminate, cry-baby homosexual has totally
destroyed the entire franchise and made it completely unsellable.
Even doing a Dallas, now the ONLY possible solution might not be enough >after the show was allowed to be taken over by a bunch of disgusting
self serving perverts and used to sexually groom children from >overwhelmingly heterosexual families in order to experiment in >homosexuality, thus providing these degenerate sick perverts with more >fodder.
Do you recall how, in the first Star Trek movie, we were all told that
Kirk now needs reading glasses? There were a few other touches to show
us that the characters had aged. Then, they decided to go back to just
having space adventures and ignoring the characters' advancing years.
They didn't focus on a retcon, but they did show Kirk coming across the
unused glasses, smirking, and discarding them. Kirk has his old
abilities back, and fans are free to assume he had eye surgery or
pretend the glasses never happened, as they prefer.
Did they turn Kirk into an effeminate cry-baby homosexual? Did they
turning him into a mass murdering genocidal monster from another
dimension that was repeatedly murdered, abused, and experimented on but
it's abductor when it was a child? Only a sick perverted franchise >destroying mind could come up with such obscenities.
Star Trek can be saved by placing all the woke crap that came after real >Star Trek ended with Enterprise in 2005 in the Kelvin Universe. Doctor
Who on the other hand cannot be saved by a retcon. The entire degeneracy
for Chibnall and Davies must be completely stripped from the show
without even referring to it.
I think that's what RTD tried to do in "The Giggle," when the Toymaker
mentions that the Doctor's timeline got mangled. RTD even indicated that
this was intended as a quiet retcon of the Timeless Child, but it's not
good enough for some of us.
RTD quadrupled down on the Timeless Child monster. That along with >Whittaker, Gay-Transgender-Tennant, and Gay-Cry-Baby-Gatwa must be >completely erased as nothing more than a dream that is never referred to >ever again.
The show has now become totally unsellable.
Why would anyone in Saudi-Arabia allow this show to be aired or
distributed into the country when it features a sexually homosexual
predator as its main protagonist who sexually grooms children to become >fodder for himself of people like him?
Why would any other state in the Middle East want to purchase this show >which shits in the face of Islamic religious values?
Why would any African country want to purchase this totally gay shit
show when these country string homosexuals up from the nearest tree by
their scrotums and set them on fire? Why didn't Gatwa mention these
things when he was making his disgusting racist speech about how white >people treat people like him, when people who look like him utterly
despise people like him because of his sexuality, and when people from >Gatwa's own country including children systematically butchered each
other because of which tribe they belonged to?
Why would any Christian country from Latin American would to screen this >show to an overwhelmingly Catholic and heterosexual audience?
The same goes for countries in Asia? Why would a religious and/or >overwhelmingly heterosexual audience be interested in a show where the
main protagonists is a gay or bi-sexual? Why would degeneracy like this
be deemed suitable for a family audience or any audience since it seeks
to sexually groom children?
The taint of homosexuality has made the show both unwatchable and >unsellable. That's why the audience dropped to less than 1.5 million,
and those were just people who had their TVs turned on all day like in >George Orwell's 1984. In regards to streaming Disney's own figures show
that only round 200-300 people actually watched each episode from start
to finish.
This is not only down to extremely bad writing, its primarily down to
trying to foist disgusting political ideology and sexual perversions on
an unsuspecting audience. Woekry ALWAYS results in bad writing. They
both go hand in hand because wokery isn't about entertaining people its >about brainwashing them as George Orwell describes in 1984 from the very >beginning all the way to the Appendix of his book.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <10tvmcp$245a8$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
The 13th Doctor was actually Matt Smith.
Okay, you're counting the War Doctor, I suppose... but I'm pretty sure >you're not counting the woman they inserted. Who's the other one? The
Hand Doctor? He was human, though, or at least he said he was.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 12/05/2026 14:24, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw
it saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't
have to. We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying
to explain it away or undo it. Just move forward...
If I were the showrunner, that's pretty much what I would do.
I would throw in one small nod to the old fans, to indicate
that they can relax about whatever the issue was.
The problem I have with a retcon of the 13th Doctor is where do
you stop? If you want to wipe out a female Doctor you'll also
have to wipe-out a female Master (Missy) and then The General,
Even better still. That's when rot set in. The ratings instantly
collapsed in half the moment after they turned the Master into a woman.
But the woke morons refused to accept it.
etc. etc. It'd be like pulling on a loose thread... before you
knew it you'd have no sweater left!
The entire woke era has to be erased completely without even referring
to it in order for the show to be sellable again.
Plus, some claim it's not actually the female Doctor per se,
just the 'Timeless Child' storyline, which is a bit disingenious
judging by the fact the same people that say that here were
against Jodie Whittaker from the day she was cast as The
Doctor... and their posts still exist in the RADW archive to
prove it.
The Timeless Child monster destroys the entire franchise because it
rewrites the main protagonistrCOs origin story and turns him into a mass >murdering genocidal maniac that was created from an abused, and
repeatedly murdered, race and gender swapping, child from another
dimension, which has its memory erased but its crimes still go
unpunished. The Timeless Child monster turns Doctor Who into the
character of Doomsday from DC Comics created in order to kill Superman.
I could put up with the gender swapping and homosexuality, but the
Timeless Child monster is completely intolerable.
So how do you please everyone? Simple answer, you can't! So why
bother trying. Just move on...
The people the disgusting child grooming perverts Chibnall and Davies
were attempting to please amount to less that 0.1% of the population.
They can safely be ignored and the entire woke degeneracy they created >totally erased and never referred to ever again, and 99.9% of the
population will gladly welcome it.
If people have hang-ups, they'll just have to get over them.
It's the woke perverts that created this degenerate monstrosity that
have to get over it. 99.9% of the audience wants it gone completely.
RADW offers a good counselling service for those affected...
Do you recall how, in the first Star Trek movie, we were all
told that Kirk now needs reading glasses? There were a few
other touches to show us that the characters had aged. Then,
they decided to go back to just having space adventures and
ignoring the characters' advancing years. They didn't focus
on a retcon, but they did show Kirk coming across the unused
glasses, smirking, and discarding them. Kirk has his old
abilities back, and fans are free to assume he had eye surgery
or pretend the glasses never happened, as they prefer.
I think that's what RTD tried to do in "The Giggle," when the
Toymaker mentions that the Doctor's timeline got mangled. RTD
even indicated that this was intended as a quiet retcon of the
Timeless Child, but it's not good enough for some of us.
RTD brought Jodie Whittaker into a Ncuti Gatwa episode as the
13th Doctor in 2025, so it must have been a very quiet retcon in
2023 if she's still walking around the TARDIS in Season 2/15!
Doing a Dallas is the ONLY possible way to save this show and even then >thanks to its homosexual taint it would probably still be unsellable for >years.
The sick and degenerate writers have driven the show down the wrong road
and after having demolished every bridge and killing off real Doctor Who >it's impossible to turn back without making everything that they created >into a bad dream.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 12/05/2026 15:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0ppovh91ndrmf001@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
and then The General,
I think I missed this character. How is the General linked
to the Doctor turning into a woman?
The General was a Time Lord that changed their gender upon
regenerating in "The Time of the Doctor"... after being shot
It wasn't in "The Time of the Doctor". It was in Hell Bent, which can
safely be regarded as not being canon from they moment they killed off
both Clara and Danny Pink without the birth of any children who were >supposed to be the ancestors of Orson Pink.
by the 12th Doctor... The General went from a white male to a
black female, and we saw the regeneration happen on screen.
Plus, some claim it's not actually the female Doctor per se,
just the 'Timeless Child' storyline,
I'd nuke both.
I'm happy to ignore the bits I don't like.
So how do you please everyone? Simple answer, you can't!
So why bother trying. Just move on...
That's also fine, if it can be done. I think one of the
reasons people are struggling with it is that they aren't
giving us any new good stories. There was a ton of preachy
crap, followed by a long silence.
If the Christmas special is a rollicking adventure in the
classic style, with no tedious lectures and no LGBT themes and
no misandry and so forth, it could go a long way toward
quieting some of the complaints.
I'd like to think so, but RTD is writing and producing it...
I think that's what RTD tried to do in "The Giggle," when
the Toymaker mentions that the Doctor's timeline got
mangled. RTD even indicated that this was intended as a
quiet retcon of the Timeless Child, but it's not good
enough for some of us.
RTD brought Jodie Whittaker into a Ncuti Gatwa episode as the
13th Doctor in 2025, so it must have been a very quiet
retcon in 2023 if she's still walking around the TARDIS in
Season 2/15!
As you mentioned earlier, retconning the Timeless Child and
retconning her era aren't the same thing.
But RTD also brought The Fugitive Doctor back into a Ncuti Gatwa
episode... and she is part of the Timeless Child storyline!
Which means it must ALL be erased. There were no Doctors before Hartnell!
That's why anyone saying that RTD did a quiet retcon doesn't
make sense, as he did anything but during Ncuti's era. RTD
could have left it all alone and people might have forgotten
about it... but he chose not to.
And it doesn't look like he's going to fix it now if he's setting his
new perversion in the same universe as Handdoc with the Cybus Cybermen.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 12/05/2026 09:20, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 10/05/2026 05:45, Your Name wrote:
I guess we'll see on Monday if this latest rumour is
true ...
Doctor Who's Future Reportedly Revealed as Reboot
Details Appear Online
---------------------------------------------------
The future of Doctor Who has been in doubt for months
now,
[Snip]
A surprising new post on Reddit reveals what seems to be
a press release, dated May 11.
I think it's safe to say now that this was all a pack of lies.
It's Reddit!
Who takes anything posted there seriously?!
It's just karma farming... and/or clickbait to get attention.
Although I'm sure the BBC will partner with somebody for future
episodes of Doctor Who, but I don't see them rebooting the show
and going back to the beginning.
Partner with who? The show became completely unsellable internationally
the moment the child grooming pervert turned the Doctor a gay and
effeminate bully and sexual predator.
Do you seriously think that this will go down well in Islamic Countries? >Catholic countries? Africa? South Asia? East Asia? Eastern Europe?
What made the BBC and Disney think there would be a huge audience
wanting to embrace homosexuality, especially children? Or were they both >mislead by the compulsive liar, bully, and child grooming pervert that
was made showrunner?
To echo the words of Christopher Eccleston, SACK DAVIES, SACK TRANTER,
SACK COLLINSON, SACK GARDNER, SACK THE WHOLE LOT OF THEM, and
then, maybe, just maybe the viewers and international broadcasters might >consider coming back.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 12/05/2026 18:50, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tvmcp$245a8$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
The 13th Doctor was actually Matt Smith.
Okay, you're counting the War Doctor, I suppose... but I'm pretty sure
you're not counting the woman they inserted. Who's the other one? The
Hand Doctor? He was human, though, or at least he said he was.
HandDoc came from the remnants of the original Tennant's regeneration
energy but Tennant still regenerated into another Doctor, after fixing
the damage the Daleks did to him, who looked exactly like Tennant.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <10u0fpq$2bj1k$1@dont-email.me>, did
YourName@YourISP.com deliver unto us this message:
On 2026-05-12 10:22:39 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Daniel70 wrote:
I think the term you might have been looking for,
Blueshirt, was "All in the Family" ....
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066626/?ref_=fn_t_1
Never heard of it!
It's a bad, barely recognisable US version of the UK series "Till Death
Us Do Part". The UK version lasted longer and, as usual, was much
better. :-)
<https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060035/>
The US didn't think it was bad. It ran for years and is still beloved.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
In article <10tvrkb$25t1i$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
HandDoc came from the remnants of the original Tennant's
regeneration energy but Tennant still regenerated into
another Doctor, after fixing the damage the Daleks did to
him, who looked exactly like Tennant.
Ended up in a parallel universe with Rose.
New showrunner needs to retcon the Timeless Child!
On 12/05/2026 09:20, Blueshirt wrote:
Although I'm sure the BBC will partner with somebody for
future episodes of Doctor Who, but I don't see them
rebooting the show and going back to the beginning.
Partner with who? The show became completely unsellable
internationally the moment the child grooming pervert turned
the Doctor a gay and effeminate bully and sexual predator.
Do you seriously think that this will go down well in Islamic
Countries? Catholic countries? Africa? South Asia? East Asia?
Eastern Europe?
What made the BBC and Disney think there would be a huge
audience wanting to embrace homosexuality, especially
children? Or were they both mislead by the compulsive liar,
bully, and child grooming pervert that was made showrunner?
On 12/05/2026 15:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
As you mentioned earlier, retconning the Timeless Child
and retconning her era aren't the same thing.
But RTD also brought The Fugitive Doctor back into a Ncuti
Gatwa episode... and she is part of the Timeless Child
storyline!
Which means it must ALL be erased. There were no Doctors
before Hartnell!
That's why anyone saying that RTD did a quiet retcon doesn't
make sense, as he did anything but during Ncuti's era. RTD
could have left it all alone and people might have forgotten
about it... but he chose not to.
And it doesn't look like he's going to fix it now if he's
setting his new perversion in the same universe as Handdoc
with the Cybus Cybermen.
On 12/05/2026 14:24, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who
saw it saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it
doesn't have to. We don't need to waste time in new
episodes trying to explain it away or undo it. Just move
forward...
If I were the showrunner, that's pretty much what I would
do. I would throw in one small nod to the old fans, to
indicate that they can relax about whatever the issue was.
The problem I have with a retcon of the 13th Doctor is where
do you stop? If you want to wipe out a female Doctor you'll
also have to wipe-out a female Master (Missy) and then The
General,
Even better still. That's when rot set in. The ratings
instantly collapsed in half the moment after they turned the
Master into a woman. But the woke morons refused to accept it.
It'd be like pulling on a loose thread... before you
know it you'd have no sweater left!
The entire woke era has to be erased completely without even
referring to it in order for the show to be sellable again.
Verily, in article <xn0ppoz2x1sb1ip000@post.eweka.nl>, did blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why I think bringing Jo Martin back in a Ncuti
Gatwa episode was just done as a 'Fuck You' to the fans
that were against the 'Timeless Child'. "It's my show,
take that!!!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPEDA7BjE7Q
Good grief. Interpersonal drama. So tedious. I don't mind
personal notes -- the characters are people with backstories
-- but when emotions are the center of the show, that gets
old.
Doctor Who used to give me both fun adventures and food for
thought. At this point, I'd take either.
Verily, in article <10tuuoe$1sh55$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 10:14 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsful$133nm$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47To which I have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER!! I've seen it on T.V. so IT IS
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that version still
implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
CANON!!
I saw "The Curse of Fatal Death" on TV, too. :-\
I suppose I must regretfully agree that Whittaker is currently in canon,
but if we're retconning, we can fix that.
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0ppovh91ndrmf001@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
and then The General,
I think I missed this character. How is the General linked
to the Doctor turning into a woman?
The General was a Time Lord that changed their gender upon
regenerating in "The Time of the Doctor"... after being shot
by the 12th Doctor... The General went from a white male to a
black female, and we saw the regeneration happen on screen.
Blueshirt wrote:
The General was a Time Lord that changed their gender upon
regenerating in "The Time of the Doctor"... after being shot
by the 12th Doctor... The General went from a white male to a
black female, and we saw the regeneration happen on screen.
It was actually in "Hell Bent" that The General regenerated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93nJQj2Z97M
On 13/05/2026 12:39 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The General was a Time Lord that changed their gender upon
regenerating in "Hell Bent"... after being shot by the 12th
Doctor... The General went from a white male to a
black female, and we saw the regeneration happen on screen.
I thought HE/The General is in front of a squad of troops and
walks off screen .... regenerates .... and SHE/The General
walks back on screen and takes up a position in front of the
squad of troops. .... but we didn't actually see the
re-generation.
But I could be wrong!! WHO?? ME wrong?? NEVER!! ;-P
On 13/05/2026 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
It was actually in "Hell Bent" that The General regenerated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93nJQj2Z97M
NOT the scene I'm think of .... but I suppose THAT did happen.
On 12/05/2026 14:24, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw
it saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't
have to.-a We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying
to explain it away or undo it. Just move forward...
If I were the showrunner, that's pretty much what I would do.
I would throw in one small nod to the old fans, to indicate
that they can relax about whatever the issue was.
The problem I have with a retcon of the 13th Doctor is where do
you stop? If you want to wipe out a female Doctor you'll also
have to wipe-out a female Master (Missy) and then The General,
Even better still. That's when rot set in. The ratings instantly
collapsed in half the moment after they turned the Master into a woman.
But the woke morons refused to accept it.
etc. etc. It'd be like pulling on a loose thread... before you
knew it you'd have no sweater left!
The entire woke era has to be erased completely without even referring
to it in order for the show to be sellable again.
Plus, some claim it's not actually the female Doctor per se,
just the 'Timeless Child' storyline, which is a bit disingenious
judging by the fact the same people that say that here were
against Jodie Whittaker from the day she was cast as The
Doctor... and their posts still exist in the RADW archive to
prove it.
The Timeless Child monster destroys the entire franchise because it
rewrites the main protagonistrCOs origin story and turns him into a mass murdering genocidal maniac that was created from an abused, and
repeatedly murdered, race and gender swapping, child from another
dimension, which has its memory erased but its crimes still go
unpunished. The Timeless Child monster turns Doctor Who into the
character of Doomsday from DC Comics created in order to kill Superman.
I could put up with the gender swapping and homosexuality, but the
Timeless Child monster is completely intolerable.
The Doctor wrote:
In article
<MPG.446ce58fc84a589d989e70@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
I think that's what RTD tried to do in "The Giggle," when
the Toymaker mentions that the Doctor's timeline got
mangled. RTD even indicated that this was intended as a
quiet retcon of the Timeless Child, but it's not good enough
for some of us.
Then RTD doubled down on the Timeless Child in the 15th Doc
Era.
Deliberately to piss people like you off I'd say.
In fact, with cameos from Jodie Whittaker's Doctor and The
Fugitive Doctor in some Ncuti Gatwa episodes RTD basically
tripled down on it! I mean. he could have just not used those
characters again in the show, but he chose to do so.
There certainly was no retcon anyway, quiet or otherwise!Daniel70
--
On 12/05/2026 11:17, Daniel70 wrote:
On 11/05/2026 10:14 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsful$133nm$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47To which I have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER!! I've seen it on T.V. so IT
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that version still
implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
IS CANON!!
You mean like Bobby Ewing being murdered and Sue Ellen being blown out
of JR's office window at the top of the Ewing Building? It's not canon.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/05/2026 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
NOT the scene I'm think of .... but I suppose THAT did happen.
It was actually in "Hell Bent" that The General regenerated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93nJQj2Z97M
No, I got AI to make the scene up just to confuse you!
:)
It'll be interesting to hear the full story one day of what
went on behind the scenes in 2023 leading up to the BBC-Disney
partnership, and what exactly Disney thought they were getting
when they signed up!
On 12/05/2026 9:16 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tuuoe$1sh55$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 10:14 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsful$133nm$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47To which I have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER!! I've seen it on T.V. so IT IS
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that version still
implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
CANON!!
I saw "The Curse of Fatal Death" on TV, too. :-\
I suppose I must regretfully agree that Whittaker is currently in canon, but if we're retconning, we can fix that.
"but *if* we're retconning" .... and We're NOT!! ;-P
On 13/05/2026 3:57 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/05/2026 14:24, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw
it saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't
have to.-a We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying
to explain it away or undo it. Just move forward...
If I were the showrunner, that's pretty much what I would do.
I would throw in one small nod to the old fans, to indicate
that they can relax about whatever the issue was.
The problem I have with a retcon of the 13th Doctor is where do
you stop? If you want to wipe out a female Doctor you'll also
have to wipe-out a female Master (Missy) and then The General,
Even better still. That's when rot set in. The ratings instantly
collapsed in half the moment after they turned the Master into a
woman. But the woke morons refused to accept it.
etc. etc. It'd be like pulling on a loose thread... before you
knew it you'd have no sweater left!
The entire woke era has to be erased completely without even referring
to it in order for the show to be sellable again.
Plus, some claim it's not actually the female Doctor per se,
just the 'Timeless Child' storyline, which is a bit disingenious
judging by the fact the same people that say that here were
against Jodie Whittaker from the day she was cast as The
Doctor... and their posts still exist in the RADW archive to
prove it.
The Timeless Child monster destroys the entire franchise because it
rewrites the main protagonistrCOs origin story and turns him into a mass
murdering genocidal maniac that was created from an abused, and
repeatedly murdered, race and gender swapping, child from another
dimension, which has its memory erased but its crimes still go
unpunished. The Timeless Child monster turns Doctor Who into the
character of Doomsday from DC Comics created in order to kill Superman.
I could put up with the gender swapping and homosexuality, but the
Timeless Child monster is completely intolerable.
Hey, Aggy, as we've seen Clara weave her way through Time from the First Doctor until the Eleventh Doctor, how come you don't want THOSE episodes wiped from our memories as well??
The Doctor wrote:
New showrunner needs to retcon the Timeless Child!
This is like d|-j|a vu... we did this a few years back,
and it never happened.
When is the penny going to drop that you aren't likely
to get your wish no matter how many times you say it?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <10tvrkb$25t1i$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
HandDoc came from the remnants of the original Tennant's
regeneration energy but Tennant still regenerated into
another Doctor, after fixing the damage the Daleks did to
him, who looked exactly like Tennant.
Ended up in a parallel universe with Rose.
Rumour is, he'll be back.
Won't that be handy?
The Doctor wrote:
New showrunner needs to retcon the Timeless Child!
This is like d|-j|a vu... we did this a few years back,
and it never happened.
When is the penny going to drop that you aren't likely
to get your wish no matter how many times you say it?
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/05/2026 09:20, Blueshirt wrote:
Although I'm sure the BBC will partner with somebody for
future episodes of Doctor Who, but I don't see them
rebooting the show and going back to the beginning.
Partner with who? The show became completely unsellable
internationally the moment the child grooming pervert turned
the Doctor a gay and effeminate bully and sexual predator.
Yet, most reports seem to suggest that the BBC are in
discussions with a streaming service 'partner' for "Doctor
Who"... of course, it could all be propaganda, but the reports
come from usually reliable sources, so somebody wants it. (What
they are prepared to pay for it and what amount of control they
get is another matter though.)
Do you seriously think that this will go down well in Islamic
Countries? Catholic countries? Africa? South Asia? East Asia?
Eastern Europe?
What made the BBC and Disney think there would be a huge
audience wanting to embrace homosexuality, especially
children? Or were they both mislead by the compulsive liar,
bully, and child grooming pervert that was made showrunner?
It'll be interesting to hear the full story one day of what
went on behind the scenes in 2023 leading up to the BBC-Disney
partnership, and what exactly Disney thought they were getting
when they signed up!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/05/2026 15:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
As you mentioned earlier, retconning the Timeless Child
and retconning her era aren't the same thing.
But RTD also brought The Fugitive Doctor back into a Ncuti
Gatwa episode... and she is part of the Timeless Child
storyline!
Which means it must ALL be erased. There were no Doctors
before Hartnell!
That was my point, there couldn't have been a reboot - of any
description - if a "pre-Hartnell" Doctor appeared with the 15th
Doctor in a 2025 episode.
The Fugitive Doctor was part of the Timeless Child arc... if
that goes, she has to as well.
That's why anyone saying that RTD did a quiet retcon doesn't
make sense, as he did anything but during Ncuti's era. RTD
could have left it all alone and people might have forgotten
about it... but he chose not to.
And it doesn't look like he's going to fix it now if he's
setting his new perversion in the same universe as Handdoc
with the Cybus Cybermen.
That's a strange rumour, but in the past few years weird online
rumours about "Doctor Who" have often turned out to be true.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/05/2026 14:24, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who
saw it saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it
doesn't have to. We don't need to waste time in new
episodes trying to explain it away or undo it. Just move
forward...
If I were the showrunner, that's pretty much what I would
do. I would throw in one small nod to the old fans, to
indicate that they can relax about whatever the issue was.
The problem I have with a retcon of the 13th Doctor is where
do you stop? If you want to wipe out a female Doctor you'll
also have to wipe-out a female Master (Missy) and then The
General,
Even better still. That's when rot set in. The ratings
instantly collapsed in half the moment after they turned the
Master into a woman. But the woke morons refused to accept it.
I liked Missy.
Obviously they were only testing the waters with her
gender-swapping regeneration, but I thought she worked okay...
and she was better than Sacha Dhawan's version of The Master.
It'd be like pulling on a loose thread... before you
know it you'd have no sweater left!
The entire woke era has to be erased completely without even
referring to it in order for the show to be sellable again.
I'm happy for the next showrunner to just ignore that era of
the show and never mention it again... or have cameos from that
era! Just leave it all behind and move forward.
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0ppoz2x1sb1ip000@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why I think bringing Jo Martin back in a Ncuti
Gatwa episode was just done as a 'Fuck You' to the fans
that were against the 'Timeless Child'. "It's my show,
take that!!!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPEDA7BjE7Q
Good grief. Interpersonal drama. So tedious. I don't mind
personal notes -- the characters are people with backstories
-- but when emotions are the center of the show, that gets
old.
Exactly. RTD turned "Doctor Who" into a soap opera and The
Doctor into an emotional pansy.
Doctor Who used to give me both fun adventures and food for
thought. At this point, I'd take either.
"Doctor Who" was supposed to be about fun adventures in time and
space... you know, escapism. But the modern writers and
producers of the show seem to want "Doctor Who" to be all about
emotional drama and companion's home lives... companions who
are oh so 'special' and seemingly more important than The Doctor.
It's almost like EastEnders in space now.
On 12/05/2026 9:16 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tuuoe$1sh55$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47"but *if* we're retconning" .... and We're NOT!! ;-P
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 10:14 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsful$133nm$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47To which I have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER!! I've seen it on T.V. so IT IS
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that version still
implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
CANON!!
I saw "The Curse of Fatal Death" on TV, too. :-\
I suppose I must regretfully agree that Whittaker is currently in canon,
but if we're retconning, we can fix that.
----
Daniel70
On 13/05/2026 12:39 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0ppovh91ndrmf001@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
and then The General,
I think I missed this character. How is the General linked
to the Doctor turning into a woman?
The General was a Time Lord that changed their gender upon
regenerating in "The Time of the Doctor"... after being shot
by the 12th Doctor... The General went from a white male to a
black female, and we saw the regeneration happen on screen.
I thought HE/The General is in front of a squad of troops and walks off >screen .... regenerates .... and SHE/The General walks back on screen
and takes up a position in front of the squad of troops. .... but we
didn't actually see the re-generation.
But I could be wrong!! WHO?? ME wrong?? NEVER!! ;-P
----
Daniel70
On 13/05/2026 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Blueshirt wrote:NOT the scene I'm think of .... but I suppose THAT did happen.
The General was a Time Lord that changed their gender upon
regenerating in "The Time of the Doctor"... after being shot
by the 12th Doctor... The General went from a white male to a
black female, and we saw the regeneration happen on screen.
It was actually in "Hell Bent" that The General regenerated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93nJQj2Z97M
----
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/05/2026 12:39 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The General was a Time Lord that changed their gender upon
regenerating in "Hell Bent"... after being shot by the 12th
Doctor... The General went from a white male to a
black female, and we saw the regeneration happen on screen.
I thought HE/The General is in front of a squad of troops and
walks off screen .... regenerates .... and SHE/The General
walks back on screen and takes up a position in front of the
squad of troops. .... but we didn't actually see the
re-generation.
? Not even close!
But I could be wrong!! WHO?? ME wrong?? NEVER!! ;-P
Yes, you're wrong.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/05/2026 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
NOT the scene I'm think of .... but I suppose THAT did happen.
It was actually in "Hell Bent" that The General regenerated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93nJQj2Z97M
No, I got AI to make the scene up just to confuse you!
:)
On 13/05/2026 3:57 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/05/2026 14:24, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw
it saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't
have to.-a We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying
to explain it away or undo it. Just move forward...
If I were the showrunner, that's pretty much what I would do.
I would throw in one small nod to the old fans, to indicate
that they can relax about whatever the issue was.
The problem I have with a retcon of the 13th Doctor is where do
you stop? If you want to wipe out a female Doctor you'll also
have to wipe-out a female Master (Missy) and then The General,
Even better still. That's when rot set in. The ratings instantly
collapsed in half the moment after they turned the Master into a woman.
But the woke morons refused to accept it.
etc. etc. It'd be like pulling on a loose thread... before you
knew it you'd have no sweater left!
The entire woke era has to be erased completely without even referring
to it in order for the show to be sellable again.
Plus, some claim it's not actually the female Doctor per se,
just the 'Timeless Child' storyline, which is a bit disingenious
judging by the fact the same people that say that here were
against Jodie Whittaker from the day she was cast as The
Doctor... and their posts still exist in the RADW archive to
prove it.
The Timeless Child monster destroys the entire franchise because it
rewrites the main protagonistrCOs origin story and turns him into a mass
murdering genocidal maniac that was created from an abused, and
repeatedly murdered, race and gender swapping, child from another
dimension, which has its memory erased but its crimes still go
unpunished. The Timeless Child monster turns Doctor Who into the
character of Doomsday from DC Comics created in order to kill Superman.
I could put up with the gender swapping and homosexuality, but the
Timeless Child monster is completely intolerable.
Hey, Aggy, as we've seen Clara weave her way through Time from the First >Doctor until the Eleventh Doctor, how come you don't want THOSE episodes >wiped from our memories as well??
----
Daniel70
On 13/05/2026 12:15 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article
<MPG.446ce58fc84a589d989e70@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
I think that's what RTD tried to do in "The Giggle," when
the Toymaker mentions that the Doctor's timeline got
mangled. RTD even indicated that this was intended as a
quiet retcon of the Timeless Child, but it's not good enough
for some of us.
Then RTD doubled down on the Timeless Child in the 15th Doc
Era.
Deliberately to piss people like you off I'd say.
In fact, with cameos from Jodie Whittaker's Doctor and The
Fugitive Doctor in some Ncuti Gatwa episodes RTD basically
tripled down on it! I mean. he could have just not used those
characters again in the show, but he chose to do so.
... but wasn't Chris Chibnall RTD's mate?? So, of course, RTD had to
support him.
--Daniel70
There certainly was no retcon anyway, quiet or otherwise!
--
On 13/05/2026 2:51 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/05/2026 11:17, Daniel70 wrote:Sorry! In which episodes of "Doctor Who" did those two events occur, Aggy??
On 11/05/2026 10:14 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsful$133nm$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47To which I have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER!! I've seen it on T.V. so IT
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that version still
implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
IS CANON!!
You mean like Bobby Ewing being murdered and Sue Ellen being blown out
of JR's office window at the top of the Ewing Building? It's not canon.
----
Daniel70
On 13/05/2026 8:55 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:OH!! THANK YOU VERY MUCH!! ;-(
On 13/05/2026 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
NOT the scene I'm think of .... but I suppose THAT did happen.
It was actually in "Hell Bent" that The General regenerated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93nJQj2Z97M
No, I got AI to make the scene up just to confuse you!
:)
As if you need AI to bugger me up!! ;-P
----
Daniel70
Verily, in article <xn0ppq2sgy316004@post.eweka.nl>, did >blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
It'll be interesting to hear the full story one day of what
went on behind the scenes in 2023 leading up to the BBC-Disney
partnership, and what exactly Disney thought they were getting
when they signed up!
We may never know the real story. Rumors I've heard indicate that DW was >supposed to be poised to be internationally huge, and Disney+ was
supposed to take it there. Instead, it turned out the way AGA describes,
and a lot of the world won't even show it.
The people who push for heavy LGBTQOMGWTFBBQ representation don't seem
to realize, or care, what markets would be locked out. I see this a lot
in gaming. People complain that games are benighted and locked in the
past and demand gay characters, but then the game couldn't be sold in
China, which is a huge gaming market.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <10u1jkc$2k0vm$3@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 >@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 12/05/2026 9:16 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tuuoe$1sh55$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47"but *if* we're retconning" .... and We're NOT!! ;-P
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 11/05/2026 10:14 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsful$133nm$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47To which I have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER!! I've seen it on T.V. so IT IS >> >> CANON!!
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that version still
implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
I saw "The Curse of Fatal Death" on TV, too. :-\
I suppose I must regretfully agree that Whittaker is currently in canon, >> > but if we're retconning, we can fix that.
Speak for yourself. :-D
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 13/05/2026 11:59, Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/05/2026 3:57 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/05/2026 14:24, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw
it saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't
have to.-a We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying
to explain it away or undo it. Just move forward...
If I were the showrunner, that's pretty much what I would do.
I would throw in one small nod to the old fans, to indicate
that they can relax about whatever the issue was.
The problem I have with a retcon of the 13th Doctor is where do
you stop? If you want to wipe out a female Doctor you'll also
have to wipe-out a female Master (Missy) and then The General,
Even better still. That's when rot set in. The ratings instantly
collapsed in half the moment after they turned the Master into a
woman. But the woke morons refused to accept it.
etc. etc. It'd be like pulling on a loose thread... before you
knew it you'd have no sweater left!
The entire woke era has to be erased completely without even referring
to it in order for the show to be sellable again.
Plus, some claim it's not actually the female Doctor per se,
just the 'Timeless Child' storyline, which is a bit disingenious
judging by the fact the same people that say that here were
against Jodie Whittaker from the day she was cast as The
Doctor... and their posts still exist in the RADW archive to
prove it.
The Timeless Child monster destroys the entire franchise because it
rewrites the main protagonistrCOs origin story and turns him into a mass >>> murdering genocidal maniac that was created from an abused, and
repeatedly murdered, race and gender swapping, child from another
dimension, which has its memory erased but its crimes still go
unpunished. The Timeless Child monster turns Doctor Who into the
character of Doomsday from DC Comics created in order to kill Superman.
I could put up with the gender swapping and homosexuality, but the
Timeless Child monster is completely intolerable.
Hey, Aggy, as we've seen Clara weave her way through Time from the First
Doctor until the Eleventh Doctor, how come you don't want THOSE episodes
wiped from our memories as well??
There was no Timeless Child monster when Clara saw all of the
regenerations of the Doctor. They started with Hartnell and ended with >Smith. Hartnell, Troughton, Pertwee, Tom Baker, Davison, Colin Baker,
McCoy, McGann, Eccleston, Tennant, Smith, and Hurt at the end. That's
all and no more.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 13/05/2026 09:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
New showrunner needs to retcon the Timeless Child!
This is like d|-j|a vu... we did this a few years back,
and it never happened.
When is the penny going to drop that you aren't likely
to get your wish no matter how many times you say it?
When is the penny going to drop that unless the Timeless Child monster
is completely erased along with everything that came with it and the >character of the Doctor is restored to how he was before the show is >completely D-E-A-D, DEAD!
Why would any decent broadcaster air a show where the main protagonist
is a bullying, sexually harassing, gender swapping, homosexual,
genocidal monster from another dimension created from an abused child?
Do you seriously think there is an audience for that? Do you seriously
think parents will allow their children to watch this attempt to
sexually groom them to provide victims for a bunch of perverts?
The show after it was totally destroyed by Davies and Chibnall is
completely unsellable. There is no audience for it whatsoever.
Do you seriously think that a potential partner would not ask to see the >last two degenerate series and realise it was made by a bunch of sick
child grooming perverts for a bunch of man hating lesbian activists who >despise the show and will never watch it, effectuate homosexuals, and >transgenders who make up less than 0.1% of the population?
THE SHOW IS COMPLETELY DEAD!
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 13/05/2026 09:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
New showrunner needs to retcon the Timeless Child!
This is like d|-j|a vu... we did this a few years back,
and it never happened.
When is the penny going to drop that you aren't likely
to get your wish no matter how many times you say it?
When is the penny going to drop that unless the Timeless Child
monster is completely erased along with everything that came
with it and the character of the Doctor is restored to how he
was before the show is completely D-E-A-D, DEAD!
Why would any decent broadcaster air a show where the main
protagonist is a bullying, sexually harassing, gender
swapping, homosexual, genocidal monster from another dimension
created from an abused child? Do you seriously think there is
an audience for that? Do you seriously think parents will
allow their children to watch this attempt to sexually groom
them to provide victims for a bunch of perverts?
The show after it was totally destroyed by Davies and Chibnall
is completely unsellable. There is no audience for it
whatsoever.
Do you seriously think that a potential partner would not ask
to see the last two degenerate series and realise it was made
by a bunch of sick child grooming perverts for a bunch of man
hating lesbian activists who despise the show and will never
watch it, effectuate homosexuals, and transgenders who make up
less than 0.1% of the population?
THE SHOW IS COMPLETELY DEAD!
In article <xn0ppq2sgy316004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
It'll be interesting to hear the full story one day of
what went on behind the scenes in 2023 leading up to the
BBC-Disney partnership, and what exactly Disney thought
they were getting when they signed up!
I will be interested on what is signed on the dotted line.
In article <xn0ppq2l4nhxk002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
New showrunner needs to retcon the Timeless Child!
This is like d|-j|a vu... we did this a few years back,
and it never happened.
When is the penny going to drop that you aren't likely
to get your wish no matter how many times you say it?
Check the wider fan base.
In article <xn0ppq3dp1nqx5007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Good grief. Interpersonal drama. So tedious. I don't mind
personal notes -- the characters are people with backstories
-- but when emotions are the center of the show, that gets
old.
Exactly. RTD turned "Doctor Who" into a soap opera and The
Doctor into an emotional pansy.
Doctor Who used to give me both fun adventures and food for
thought. At this point, I'd take either.
"Doctor Who" was supposed to be about fun adventures in time
and space... you know, escapism. But the modern writers and
producers of the show seem to want "Doctor Who" to be all
about emotional drama and companion's home lives...
companions who are oh so 'special' and seemingly more
important than The Doctor. It's almost like EastEnders in
space now.
Hence why the Timeless Child needsto be retconned out of
Doctor Who.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 09:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
New showrunner needs to retcon the Timeless Child!
This is like d|-j|a vu... we did this a few years back,
and it never happened.
When is the penny going to drop that you aren't likely
to get your wish no matter how many times you say it?
When is the penny going to drop that unless the Timeless Child
monster is completely erased along with everything that came
with it and the character of the Doctor is restored to how he
was before the show is completely D-E-A-D, DEAD!
Which in plain English means, it's dead to you! That doesn't
necessarily mean it's dead to the BBC... and they own it.
However, "dead" is relative... as you'll still watch any new
episodes of Doctor Who that are broadcast anyway. So maybe it's
not that dead after all?!
Why would any decent broadcaster air a show where the main
protagonist is a bullying, sexually harassing, gender
swapping, homosexual, genocidal monster from another dimension
created from an abused child? Do you seriously think there is
an audience for that? Do you seriously think parents will
allow their children to watch this attempt to sexually groom
them to provide victims for a bunch of perverts?
The show after it was totally destroyed by Davies and Chibnall
is completely unsellable. There is no audience for it
whatsoever.
Apart from the people who watch it so others don't have to
obviously...
Do you seriously think that a potential partner would not ask
to see the last two degenerate series and realise it was made
by a bunch of sick child grooming perverts for a bunch of man
hating lesbian activists who despise the show and will never
watch it, effectuate homosexuals, and transgenders who make up
less than 0.1% of the population?
THE SHOW IS COMPLETELY DEAD!
Yet here we are talking about it day after day... with a new
episode to be aired in seven months time... so that doesn't
match my definition of a dead TV show. Now, "Blake's 7", that's
dead, so nobody bothers discussing that!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ppq2l4nhxk002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
New showrunner needs to retcon the Timeless Child!
This is like d|-j|a vu... we did this a few years back,
and it never happened.
When is the penny going to drop that you aren't likely
to get your wish no matter how many times you say it?
Check the wider fan base.
<looks around>
Wot, you mean all six of the people active here?
On 13/05/2026 2:51 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/05/2026 11:17, Daniel70 wrote:Sorry! In which episodes of "Doctor Who" did those two events occur, Aggy??
On 11/05/2026 10:14 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsful$133nm$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47To which I have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER!! I've seen it on T.V. so IT
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS)
still 'OUT THERE'??
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that version still
implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
IS CANON!!
You mean like Bobby Ewing being murdered and Sue Ellen being blown out
of JR's office window at the top of the Ewing Building? It's not canon.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/05/2026 09:20, Blueshirt wrote:
Although I'm sure the BBC will partner with somebody for
future episodes of Doctor Who, but I don't see them
rebooting the show and going back to the beginning.
Partner with who? The show became completely unsellable
internationally the moment the child grooming pervert turned
the Doctor a gay and effeminate bully and sexual predator.
Yet, most reports seem to suggest that the BBC are in
discussions with a streaming service 'partner' for "Doctor
Who"... of course, it could all be propaganda, but the reports
come from usually reliable sources, so somebody wants it. (What
they are prepared to pay for it and what amount of control they
get is another matter though.)
Do you seriously think that this will go down well in Islamic
Countries? Catholic countries? Africa? South Asia? East Asia?
Eastern Europe?
What made the BBC and Disney think there would be a huge
audience wanting to embrace homosexuality, especially
children? Or were they both mislead by the compulsive liar,
bully, and child grooming pervert that was made showrunner?
It'll be interesting to hear the full story one day of what
went on behind the scenes in 2023 leading up to the BBC-Disney
partnership, and what exactly Disney thought they were getting
when they signed up!
"Doctor Who" shouldn't be about inclusivity or diversity, it
should be about escapism from the real world, so the people
watching it can be detached and wrapped-up in the adventures
of our hero The Doctor first and foremost.
On 13/05/2026 09:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Partner with who? The show became completely unsellable
internationally the moment the child grooming pervert
turned the Doctor a gay and effeminate bully and sexual
predator.
Yet, most reports seem to suggest that the BBC are in
discussions with a streaming service 'partner' for "Doctor
Just like the discussions they keep having all day and night
with their imaginary friend.
Who"... of course, it could all be propaganda, but the
reports come from usually reliable sources, so somebody
wants it. (What
Readit a reliable source? LOL!
What made the BBC and Disney think there would be a huge
audience wanting to embrace homosexuality, especially
children? Or were they both mislead by the compulsive liar,
bully, and child grooming pervert that was made showrunner?
It'll be interesting to hear the full story one day of what
went on behind the scenes in 2023 leading up to the
BBC-Disney partnership, and what exactly Disney thought they
were getting when they signed up!
Disney were CONNED!
They thought they were getting a show which was
quintessentially British. Instead they were given a show about
an effeminate Rwandan homosexual who was characterised as a
bullying sexual predator.
On 13/05/2026 18:04, Blueshirt wrote:
Now, "Blake's 7", that's dead, so nobody bothers
discussing that!
Blake's 7 killed off all of its cast members except
Servalan/Slear so why would anyone want to talk about it
when none of them can ever return?
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 09:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
New showrunner needs to retcon the Timeless Child!
This is like d|-j|a vu... we did this a few years back,
and it never happened.
When is the penny going to drop that you aren't likely
to get your wish no matter how many times you say it?
When is the penny going to drop that unless the Timeless Child
monster is completely erased along with everything that came
with it and the character of the Doctor is restored to how he
was before the show is completely D-E-A-D, DEAD!
Which in plain English means, it's dead to you! That doesn't
necessarily mean it's dead to the BBC... and they own it.
However, "dead" is relative... as you'll still watch any new
episodes of Doctor Who that are broadcast anyway. So maybe it's
not that dead after all?!
Why would any decent broadcaster air a show where the main
protagonist is a bullying, sexually harassing, gender
swapping, homosexual, genocidal monster from another dimension
created from an abused child? Do you seriously think there is
an audience for that? Do you seriously think parents will
allow their children to watch this attempt to sexually groom
them to provide victims for a bunch of perverts?
The show after it was totally destroyed by Davies and Chibnall
is completely unsellable. There is no audience for it
whatsoever.
Apart from the people who watch it so others don't have to
obviously...
Do you seriously think that a potential partner would not ask
to see the last two degenerate series and realise it was made
by a bunch of sick child grooming perverts for a bunch of man
hating lesbian activists who despise the show and will never
watch it, effectuate homosexuals, and transgenders who make up
less than 0.1% of the population?
THE SHOW IS COMPLETELY DEAD!
Yet here we are talking about it day after day... with a new
episode to be aired in seven months time... so that doesn't
match my definition of a dead TV show. Now, "Blake's 7", that's
dead, so nobody bothers discussing that!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ppq2l4nhxk002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
New showrunner needs to retcon the Timeless Child!
This is like d|-j|a vu... we did this a few years back,
and it never happened.
When is the penny going to drop that you aren't likely
to get your wish no matter how many times you say it?
Check the wider fan base.
<looks around>
Wot, you mean all six of the people active here?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ppq2sgy316004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
It'll be interesting to hear the full story one day of
what went on behind the scenes in 2023 leading up to the
BBC-Disney partnership, and what exactly Disney thought
they were getting when they signed up!
I will be interested on what is signed on the dotted line.
Taking a wild guess... a couple of signatures maybe?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ppq3dp1nqx5007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Good grief. Interpersonal drama. So tedious. I don't mind
personal notes -- the characters are people with backstories
-- but when emotions are the center of the show, that gets
old.
Exactly. RTD turned "Doctor Who" into a soap opera and The
Doctor into an emotional pansy.
Doctor Who used to give me both fun adventures and food for
thought. At this point, I'd take either.
"Doctor Who" was supposed to be about fun adventures in time
and space... you know, escapism. But the modern writers and
producers of the show seem to want "Doctor Who" to be all
about emotional drama and companion's home lives...
companions who are oh so 'special' and seemingly more
important than The Doctor. It's almost like EastEnders in
space now.
Hence why the Timeless Child needsto be retconned out of
Doctor Who.
No, Dave... that's not the main issue. Doctor Who can be made
to be fun and interesting again with some decent stories. More
sci-fi adventures of an alien travelling in time and space and
less soap opera.
"Doctor Who" shouldn't be about inclusivity or diversity, it
should be about escapism from the real world, so the people
watching it can be detached and wrapped-up in the adventures
of our hero The Doctor first and foremost.
Whether the producers want to do that though is another matter.
On 13/05/2026 18:04, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 09:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
New showrunner needs to retcon the Timeless Child!
This is like d|-j|a vu... we did this a few years back,
and it never happened.
When is the penny going to drop that you aren't likely
to get your wish no matter how many times you say it?
When is the penny going to drop that unless the Timeless Child
monster is completely erased along with everything that came
with it and the character of the Doctor is restored to how he
was before the show is completely D-E-A-D, DEAD!
Which in plain English means, it's dead to you! That doesn't
necessarily mean it's dead to the BBC... and they own it.
It's dead to 99.9% of the population whatever the degenerate woke child >groomers running the BBC think. The show is unsellable after the pervert >Russell T Davies turned the Doctor into an effeminate homosexual and
used him to sexually groom children. Doctor Who has been thoroughly
tainted by this obscenity. The majority of the public are heterosexual
and don't want their child groomed to engage homosexual or bisexual
actors. Who wants to watch a show about a homosexual child grooming
pervert? Why would any decent broadcaster purchase this show which
probably not only breaks the law in their country but which doesn't have
an audience any more?
However, "dead" is relative... as you'll still watch any new
episodes of Doctor Who that are broadcast anyway. So maybe it's
not that dead after all?!
Doctor Who ended in 2017. There hasn't been a sing new episode of it >broadcast of it since then.
Why would any decent broadcaster air a show where the main
protagonist is a bullying, sexually harassing, gender
swapping, homosexual, genocidal monster from another dimension
created from an abused child? Do you seriously think there is
an audience for that? Do you seriously think parents will
allow their children to watch this attempt to sexually groom
them to provide victims for a bunch of perverts?
The show after it was totally destroyed by Davies and Chibnall
is completely unsellable. There is no audience for it
whatsoever.
Apart from the people who watch it so others don't have to
obviously...
All 1.5 million who have their TVs turned on all day waiting for the >announcements about the state of the economy and the prices of
commoditises and industrial output to come on while they're making
entries in their diaries, which are of course illegal. Watch out for the >knock on the door from the thought police.
Do you seriously think that a potential partner would not ask
to see the last two degenerate series and realise it was made
by a bunch of sick child grooming perverts for a bunch of man
hating lesbian activists who despise the show and will never
watch it, effectuate homosexuals, and transgenders who make up
less than 0.1% of the population?
THE SHOW IS COMPLETELY DEAD!
Yet here we are talking about it day after day... with a new
episode to be aired in seven months time... so that doesn't
There's no new episode to be aired at all at any time. Doctor Who ended
in 2017. The monstrosity which replaced it has ceased production. Who do
the BBC think they can sell this gay s*t to?
match my definition of a dead TV show. Now, "Blake's 7", that's
dead, so nobody bothers discussing that!
Blake's 7 killed off all of its cast members except Servalan/Slear so
why would anyone want to talk about it when none of them can ever return?
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 13/05/2026 18:04, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ppq2l4nhxk002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
New showrunner needs to retcon the Timeless Child!
This is like d|-j|a vu... we did this a few years back,
and it never happened.
When is the penny going to drop that you aren't likely
to get your wish no matter how many times you say it?
Check the wider fan base.
<looks around>
Wot, you mean all six of the people active here?
That's correct. Apart from us six there is no active fan base for Doctor
Who any more since the show is completely dead.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 13/05/2026 12:37, Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/05/2026 2:51 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/05/2026 11:17, Daniel70 wrote:Sorry! In which episodes of "Doctor Who" did those two events occur, Aggy??
On 11/05/2026 10:14 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10tsful$133nm$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47To which I have NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER!! I've seen it on T.V. so IT
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Isn't there still a Bi-generated DoctorDavid (complete with TARDIS) >>>>>> still 'OUT THERE'??
Yes, but he regenerated from Whittaker, so using that version still
implies that Whittaker is part of canon.
IS CANON!!
You mean like Bobby Ewing being murdered and Sue Ellen being blown out
of JR's office window at the top of the Ewing Building? It's not canon.
Can't you recognise a simile when you see one? Do you even understand
what one is? Don't the teach English at school in Australia?
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 13/05/2026 09:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/05/2026 09:20, Blueshirt wrote:
Although I'm sure the BBC will partner with somebody for
future episodes of Doctor Who, but I don't see them
rebooting the show and going back to the beginning.
Partner with who? The show became completely unsellable
internationally the moment the child grooming pervert turned
the Doctor a gay and effeminate bully and sexual predator.
Yet, most reports seem to suggest that the BBC are in
discussions with a streaming service 'partner' for "Doctor
Just like the discussions they keep having all day and night with their >imaginary friend.
Who"... of course, it could all be propaganda, but the reports
come from usually reliable sources, so somebody wants it. (What
Readit a reliable source? LOL!
they are prepared to pay for it and what amount of control they
get is another matter though.)
Do I need to quote Eccleston again?
Do you seriously think that this will go down well in Islamic
Countries? Catholic countries? Africa? South Asia? East Asia?
Eastern Europe?
What made the BBC and Disney think there would be a huge
audience wanting to embrace homosexuality, especially
children? Or were they both mislead by the compulsive liar,
bully, and child grooming pervert that was made showrunner?
It'll be interesting to hear the full story one day of what
went on behind the scenes in 2023 leading up to the BBC-Disney
partnership, and what exactly Disney thought they were getting
when they signed up!
Disney were CONNED!
They thought they were getting a show which was quintessentially--
British. Instead they were given a show about an effeminate Rwandan >homosexual who was characterised as a bullying sexual predator.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <xn0ppqg6jj18vv003@post.eweka.nl>, did >blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
"Doctor Who" shouldn't be about inclusivity or diversity, it
should be about escapism from the real world, so the people
watching it can be detached and wrapped-up in the adventures
of our hero The Doctor first and foremost.
Absolutely!
Ideally, we should be invested in the characters of the week. Like the >Doctor and his companions, we pop in on them and quickly slot into their >lives as if we'd known them for years. When the Doctor or a companion is
the focus, it should be occasional and important.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 09:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Partner with who? The show became completely unsellable
internationally the moment the child grooming pervert
turned the Doctor a gay and effeminate bully and sexual
predator.
Yet, most reports seem to suggest that the BBC are in
discussions with a streaming service 'partner' for "Doctor
Just like the discussions they keep having all day and night
with their imaginary friend.
No smoke without fire and all that...
Who"... of course, it could all be propaganda, but the
reports come from usually reliable sources, so somebody
wants it. (What
Readit a reliable source? LOL!
GB is usually where the reliable 'source' posts his info...
The idiots on Reddit usually just copy it, or make up their own
'rumours' to farm karma.
What made the BBC and Disney think there would be a huge
audience wanting to embrace homosexuality, especially
children? Or were they both mislead by the compulsive liar,
bully, and child grooming pervert that was made showrunner?
It'll be interesting to hear the full story one day of what
went on behind the scenes in 2023 leading up to the
BBC-Disney partnership, and what exactly Disney thought they
were getting when they signed up!
Disney were CONNED!
They conned themselves!
--They thought they were getting a show which was
quintessentially British. Instead they were given a show about
an effeminate Rwandan homosexual who was characterised as a
bullying sexual predator.
Well... there is that. But the behind the scenes story will
become public one day, nothing stays secret forever.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 18:04, Blueshirt wrote:
Now, "Blake's 7", that's dead, so nobody bothers
discussing that!
Blake's 7 killed off all of its cast members except
Servalan/Slear so why would anyone want to talk about it
when none of them can ever return?
It hasn't stopped Big Finish from producing a range of Blake's 7
audios though... which means there is life after death!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 18:04, Blueshirt wrote:
Now, "Blake's 7", that's dead, so nobody bothers
discussing that!
Blake's 7 killed off all of its cast members except
Servalan/Slear so why would anyone want to talk about it
when none of them can ever return?
It hasn't stopped Big Finish from producing a range of Blake's 7
audios though... which means there is life after death!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 09:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
What made the BBC and Disney think there would be a huge
audience wanting to embrace homosexuality, especially
children? Or were they both mislead by the compulsive liar,
bully, and child grooming pervert that was made showrunner?
It'll be interesting to hear the full story one day of what
went on behind the scenes in 2023 leading up to the
BBC-Disney partnership, and what exactly Disney thought they
were getting when they signed up!
Disney were CONNED!
They conned themselves!
They thought they were getting a show which was
quintessentially British. Instead they were given a show about
an effeminate Rwandan homosexual who was characterised as a
bullying sexual predator.
Well... there is that. But the behind the scenes story will
become public one day, nothing stays secret forever.
On 13/05/2026 20:20, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 18:04, Blueshirt wrote:
Now, "Blake's 7", that's dead, so nobody bothers
discussing that!
Blake's 7 killed off all of its cast members except
Servalan/Slear so why would anyone want to talk about it
when none of them can ever return?
It hasn't stopped Big Finish from producing a range of Blake's 7
audios though... which means there is life after death!
All set before they were all killed.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 13/05/2026 20:17, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 09:46, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
What made the BBC and Disney think there would be a huge
audience wanting to embrace homosexuality, especially
children? Or were they both mislead by the compulsive liar,
bully, and child grooming pervert that was made showrunner?
It'll be interesting to hear the full story one day of what
went on behind the scenes in 2023 leading up to the
BBC-Disney partnership, and what exactly Disney thought they
were getting when they signed up!
Disney were CONNED!
They conned themselves!
They thought they were getting a show which was
quintessentially British. Instead they were given a show about
an effeminate Rwandan homosexual who was characterised as a
bullying sexual predator.
Well... there is that. But the behind the scenes story will
become public one day, nothing stays secret forever.
Bait and Switch. Disney thought they were getting Tennant and then the >pervert Davies turned him gay and transgender and then switched him for >Gatwa and used both to try to sexually groom children. Then he decided
to make a spin off to promote bestiality and Disney were so disgusted
that they refused to show it.
The entire franchise is completely dead and unsellable as a result.
The BBC would have to make the series first with its own money and then
try to get international broadcasters to buy it after seeing the
results, and then there's the sour taint of homosexuality and the >systematical bigotry against men, white people, and heterosexual >relationships that it will never get rid off. No broadcaster is going to
buy a package which includes cry-baby Gatwa's sexual debauchery,
indecent behaviour, bullying, racism, and sexual harassment, because
they won't be able to show it without losing their entire audience. All
of this child grooming fuelled degeneracy has to be completely erased >without even mentioning it since it can never be sold anywhere in the
world without raising concern about decency and child protection, and no
one would want to watch it anyway.
The only other thing the BBC could do to try to get finance is to give
full editorial and creative control to whoever pays to broadcast the
show. But even then there is still the sexual depravity that the show
has become associated with which makes it totally unfit for a family >audience. No one is going to make any money from a show about a gender
and race swapping homosexual. Who's going to watch it?
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 13/05/2026 11:59, Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/05/2026 3:57 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/05/2026 14:24, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw
it saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't
have to.-a We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying
to explain it away or undo it. Just move forward...
If I were the showrunner, that's pretty much what I would do.
I would throw in one small nod to the old fans, to indicate
that they can relax about whatever the issue was.
The problem I have with a retcon of the 13th Doctor is where do
you stop? If you want to wipe out a female Doctor you'll also
have to wipe-out a female Master (Missy) and then The General,
Even better still. That's when rot set in. The ratings instantly
collapsed in half the moment after they turned the Master into a
woman. But the woke morons refused to accept it.
etc. etc. It'd be like pulling on a loose thread... before you
knew it you'd have no sweater left!
The entire woke era has to be erased completely without even
referring to it in order for the show to be sellable again.
Plus, some claim it's not actually the female Doctor per se,
just the 'Timeless Child' storyline, which is a bit disingenious
judging by the fact the same people that say that here were
against Jodie Whittaker from the day she was cast as The
Doctor... and their posts still exist in the RADW archive to
prove it.
The Timeless Child monster destroys the entire franchise because it
rewrites the main protagonistrCOs origin story and turns him into a
mass murdering genocidal maniac that was created from an abused, and
repeatedly murdered, race and gender swapping, child from another
dimension, which has its memory erased but its crimes still go
unpunished. The Timeless Child monster turns Doctor Who into the
character of Doomsday from DC Comics created in order to kill Superman.
I could put up with the gender swapping and homosexuality, but the
Timeless Child monster is completely intolerable.
Hey, Aggy, as we've seen Clara weave her way through Time from the
First Doctor until the Eleventh Doctor, how come you don't want THOSE
episodes wiped from our memories as well??
There was no Timeless Child monster when Clara saw all of the
regenerations of the Doctor. They started with Hartnell and ended with Smith. Hartnell, Troughton, Pertwee, Tom Baker, Davison, Colin Baker,
McCoy, McGann, Eccleston, Tennant, Smith, and Hurt at the end. That's
all and no more.
Yet here we are talking about it day after day... with a new
episode to be aired in seven months time... so that doesn't
match my definition of a dead TV show. Now, "Blake's 7", that's
dead, so nobody bothers discussing that!
On 13/05/2026 18:04, Blueshirt wrote:
Yet here we are talking about it day after day... with a new
episode to be aired in seven months time... so that doesn't
There's no new episode to be aired at all at any time. Doctor Who ended
in 2017. The monstrosity which replaced it has ceased production. Who do
the BBC think they can sell this gay shit to?
match my definition of a dead TV show. Now, "Blake's 7", that's
dead, so nobody bothers discussing that!
Blake's 7 killed off all of its cast members except Servalan/Slear so
why would anyone want to talk about it when none of them can ever return?
On 13/05/2026 10:38 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 11:59, Daniel70 wrote:.... until THERE WERE more!!
On 13/05/2026 3:57 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/05/2026 14:24, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw
it saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't
have to.-a We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying
to explain it away or undo it. Just move forward...
If I were the showrunner, that's pretty much what I would do.
I would throw in one small nod to the old fans, to indicate
that they can relax about whatever the issue was.
The problem I have with a retcon of the 13th Doctor is where do
you stop? If you want to wipe out a female Doctor you'll also
have to wipe-out a female Master (Missy) and then The General,
Even better still. That's when rot set in. The ratings instantly
collapsed in half the moment after they turned the Master into a
woman. But the woke morons refused to accept it.
etc. etc. It'd be like pulling on a loose thread... before you
knew it you'd have no sweater left!
The entire woke era has to be erased completely without even
referring to it in order for the show to be sellable again.
Plus, some claim it's not actually the female Doctor per se,
just the 'Timeless Child' storyline, which is a bit disingenious
judging by the fact the same people that say that here were
against Jodie Whittaker from the day she was cast as The
Doctor... and their posts still exist in the RADW archive to
prove it.
The Timeless Child monster destroys the entire franchise because it
rewrites the main protagonistrCOs origin story and turns him into a
mass murdering genocidal maniac that was created from an abused, and
repeatedly murdered, race and gender swapping, child from another
dimension, which has its memory erased but its crimes still go
unpunished. The Timeless Child monster turns Doctor Who into the
character of Doomsday from DC Comics created in order to kill Superman. >>>>
I could put up with the gender swapping and homosexuality, but the
Timeless Child monster is completely intolerable.
Hey, Aggy, as we've seen Clara weave her way through Time from the
First Doctor until the Eleventh Doctor, how come you don't want THOSE
episodes wiped from our memories as well??
There was no Timeless Child monster when Clara saw all of the
regenerations of the Doctor. They started with Hartnell and ended with
Smith. Hartnell, Troughton, Pertwee, Tom Baker, Davison, Colin Baker,
McCoy, McGann, Eccleston, Tennant, Smith, and Hurt at the end. That's
all and no more.
----
Daniel70
On 14/05/2026 3:04 am, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Yet here we are talking about it day after day... with a new
episode to be aired in seven months time... so that doesn't
match my definition of a dead TV show. Now, "Blake's 7", that's
dead, so nobody bothers discussing that!
Can't say I've ever seen a "Blake's 7" episode .... EVER!!
So I'm glad we are not discussing it.
----
Daniel70
On 14/05/2026 3:47 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 18:04, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Hey, problem solved .... the "Blake's 7" crew can regenerate so they can >become a NEW, IMPROVED "Blake's 7" .... or "Blake's 14" even, maybe!!Yet here we are talking about it day after day... with a new
episode to be aired in seven months time... so that doesn't
There's no new episode to be aired at all at any time. Doctor Who ended
in 2017. The monstrosity which replaced it has ceased production. Who do
the BBC think they can sell this gay shit to?
match my definition of a dead TV show. Now, "Blake's 7", that's
dead, so nobody bothers discussing that!
Blake's 7 killed off all of its cast members except Servalan/Slear so
why would anyone want to talk about it when none of them can ever return?
----
Daniel70
Bait and Switch. Disney thought they were getting Tennant and then the pervert Davies turned him gay and transgender and then switched him for Gatwa and used both to try to sexually groom children. Then he decided
to make a spin off to promote bestiality and Disney were so disgusted
that they refused to show it.
On 13/05/2026 10:38 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 11:59, Daniel70 wrote:.... until THERE WERE more!!
On 13/05/2026 3:57 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/05/2026 14:24, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw
it saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't
have to.-a We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying
to explain it away or undo it. Just move forward...
If I were the showrunner, that's pretty much what I would do.
I would throw in one small nod to the old fans, to indicate
that they can relax about whatever the issue was.
The problem I have with a retcon of the 13th Doctor is where do
you stop? If you want to wipe out a female Doctor you'll also
have to wipe-out a female Master (Missy) and then The General,
Even better still. That's when rot set in. The ratings instantly
collapsed in half the moment after they turned the Master into a
woman. But the woke morons refused to accept it.
etc. etc. It'd be like pulling on a loose thread... before you
knew it you'd have no sweater left!
The entire woke era has to be erased completely without even
referring to it in order for the show to be sellable again.
Plus, some claim it's not actually the female Doctor per se,
just the 'Timeless Child' storyline, which is a bit disingenious
judging by the fact the same people that say that here were
against Jodie Whittaker from the day she was cast as The
Doctor... and their posts still exist in the RADW archive to
prove it.
The Timeless Child monster destroys the entire franchise because it
rewrites the main protagonistrCOs origin story and turns him into a
mass murdering genocidal maniac that was created from an abused, and
repeatedly murdered, race and gender swapping, child from another
dimension, which has its memory erased but its crimes still go
unpunished. The Timeless Child monster turns Doctor Who into the
character of Doomsday from DC Comics created in order to kill Superman. >>>>
I could put up with the gender swapping and homosexuality, but the
Timeless Child monster is completely intolerable.
Hey, Aggy, as we've seen Clara weave her way through Time from the
First Doctor until the Eleventh Doctor, how come you don't want THOSE
episodes wiped from our memories as well??
There was no Timeless Child monster when Clara saw all of the
regenerations of the Doctor. They started with Hartnell and ended with
Smith. Hartnell, Troughton, Pertwee, Tom Baker, Davison, Colin Baker,
McCoy, McGann, Eccleston, Tennant, Smith, and Hurt at the end. That's
all and no more.
On 14/05/2026 3:47 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 18:04, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Yet here we are talking about it day after day... with a new episode to >>> be aired in seven months time... so that doesn't
There's no new episode to be aired at all at any time. Doctor Who ended
in 2017. The monstrosity which replaced it has ceased production. Who
do the BBC think they can sell this gay shit to?
match my definition of a dead TV show. Now, "Blake's 7", that's dead,
so nobody bothers discussing that!
Blake's 7 killed off all of its cast members except Servalan/Slear so
why would anyone want to talk about it when none of them can ever
return?
Hey, problem solved .... the "Blake's 7" crew can regenerate so they
can become a NEW, IMPROVED "Blake's 7" .... or "Blake's 14" even,
maybe!!
Verily, in article <10u387v$341q1$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Bait and Switch. Disney thought they were getting Tennant and then the
pervert Davies turned him gay and transgender and then switched him for
Gatwa and used both to try to sexually groom children. Then he decided
to make a spin off to promote bestiality and Disney were so disgusted
that they refused to show it.
Disney's principles, such as they are, don't including resisting the
rainbow tide.
My guess is that Disney dropped it because no one was watching it.
Verily, in article <10u387v$341q1$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Bait and Switch. Disney thought they were getting Tennant and then the
pervert Davies turned him gay and transgender and then switched him for
Gatwa and used both to try to sexually groom children. Then he decided
to make a spin off to promote bestiality and Disney were so disgusted
that they refused to show it.
Disney's principles, such as they are, don't including resisting the
rainbow tide.
My guess is that Disney dropped it because no one was watching it.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 14/05/2026 12:45, Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/05/2026 10:38 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 11:59, Daniel70 wrote:.... until THERE WERE more!!
On 13/05/2026 3:57 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/05/2026 14:24, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pposlg1jhsdo005@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
That's why a retcon is waste of time... the people who saw
it saw it, and if they don't want it to count, it doesn't
have to.-a We don't need to waste time in new episodes trying
to explain it away or undo it. Just move forward...
If I were the showrunner, that's pretty much what I would do.
I would throw in one small nod to the old fans, to indicate
that they can relax about whatever the issue was.
The problem I have with a retcon of the 13th Doctor is where do
you stop? If you want to wipe out a female Doctor you'll also
have to wipe-out a female Master (Missy) and then The General,
Even better still. That's when rot set in. The ratings instantly
collapsed in half the moment after they turned the Master into a
woman. But the woke morons refused to accept it.
etc. etc. It'd be like pulling on a loose thread... before you
knew it you'd have no sweater left!
The entire woke era has to be erased completely without even
referring to it in order for the show to be sellable again.
Plus, some claim it's not actually the female Doctor per se,
just the 'Timeless Child' storyline, which is a bit disingenious
judging by the fact the same people that say that here were
against Jodie Whittaker from the day she was cast as The
Doctor... and their posts still exist in the RADW archive to
prove it.
The Timeless Child monster destroys the entire franchise because it >>>>> rewrites the main protagonistrCOs origin story and turns him into a >>>>> mass murdering genocidal maniac that was created from an abused, and >>>>> repeatedly murdered, race and gender swapping, child from another
dimension, which has its memory erased but its crimes still go
unpunished. The Timeless Child monster turns Doctor Who into the
character of Doomsday from DC Comics created in order to kill Superman. >>>>>
I could put up with the gender swapping and homosexuality, but the
Timeless Child monster is completely intolerable.
Hey, Aggy, as we've seen Clara weave her way through Time from the
First Doctor until the Eleventh Doctor, how come you don't want THOSE >>>> episodes wiped from our memories as well??
There was no Timeless Child monster when Clara saw all of the
regenerations of the Doctor. They started with Hartnell and ended with
Smith. Hartnell, Troughton, Pertwee, Tom Baker, Davison, Colin Baker,
McCoy, McGann, Eccleston, Tennant, Smith, and Hurt at the end. That's
all and no more.
...um, ...no there were not...
Doctor I set you free!
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 2026-05-14 12:01:37 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 14/05/2026 3:47 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 18:04, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Yet here we are talking about it day after day... with a new episode to >>>> be aired in seven months time... so that doesn't
There's no new episode to be aired at all at any time. Doctor Who ended >>> in 2017. The monstrosity which replaced it has ceased production. Who
do the BBC think they can sell this gay shit to?
match my definition of a dead TV show. Now, "Blake's 7", that's dead, >>>> so nobody bothers discussing that!
Blake's 7 killed off all of its cast members except Servalan/Slear so
why would anyone want to talk about it when none of them can ever
return?
Hey, problem solved .... the "Blake's 7" crew can regenerate so they
can become a NEW, IMPROVED "Blake's 7" .... or "Blake's 14" even,
maybe!!
There have been rumours of a new Blake's 7 show - first as a sequel
series starring Paul Darrow's character Avon, and then after he died as
a remake / reboot. The latest rumour, supposedly confirming a reboot >attempt, was in January 2026 and involves Doctor Who director Peter
Hoar. ><https://www.radiotimes.com/tv/sci-fi/blakes-7-reboot-peter-hoar-newsupdate/>
On 14/05/2026 13:47, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10u387v$341q1$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Bait and Switch. Disney thought they were getting Tennant and then the
pervert Davies turned him gay and transgender and then switched him for
Gatwa and used both to try to sexually groom children. Then he decided
to make a spin off to promote bestiality and Disney were so disgusted
that they refused to show it.
Disney's principles, such as they are, don't including resisting the
rainbow tide.
My guess is that Disney dropped it because no one was watching it.
Governor Ron DeSantis taught them a lesson they will never forget. Stop >sexually grooming children you degenerate woke perverts!
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 2026-05-14 12:01:37 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 14/05/2026 3:47 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 18:04, Blueshirt wrote:
Now, "Blake's 7", that's dead, so nobody bothers
discussing that!
Blake's 7 killed off all of its cast members except
Servalan/Slear so why would anyone want to talk about
it when none of them can ever return?
Hey, problem solved... the "Blake's 7" crew can regenerate
so they can become a NEW, IMPROVED "Blake's 7"
There have been rumours of a new Blake's 7 show - first as a
sequel series starring Paul Darrow's character Avon, and then
after he died as a remake / reboot. The latest rumour,
supposedly confirming a reboot attempt, was in January 2026
and involves Doctor Who director Peter Hoar.
Your Name wrote:
On 2026-05-14 12:01:37 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 14/05/2026 3:47 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 18:04, Blueshirt wrote:
Now, "Blake's 7", that's dead, so nobody bothers
discussing that!
Blake's 7 killed off all of its cast members except
Servalan/Slear so why would anyone want to talk about
it when none of them can ever return?
Hey, problem solved... the "Blake's 7" crew can regenerate
so they can become a NEW, IMPROVED "Blake's 7"
There have been rumours of a new Blake's 7 show - first as a
sequel series starring Paul Darrow's character Avon, and then
after he died as a remake / reboot. The latest rumour,
supposedly confirming a reboot attempt, was in January 2026
and involves Doctor Who director Peter Hoar.
I doubt a "Blake's 7" reboot would be much good, based on other
TV shows that have tried it... so I'm happy with the Big Finish
novels for my B7 fix! (Some of which are actually quite good.)
Let's not have our memories tainted, leave the show in the grave.
Your Name wrote:
On 2026-05-14 12:01:37 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 14/05/2026 3:47 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 18:04, Blueshirt wrote:
Now, "Blake's 7", that's dead, so nobody bothers discussing that!
Blake's 7 killed off all of its cast members except Servalan/Slear so >>>> why would anyone want to talk about it when none of them can ever
return?
Hey, problem solved... the "Blake's 7" crew can regenerate so they can
become a NEW, IMPROVED "Blake's 7"
There have been rumours of a new Blake's 7 show - first as a sequel
series starring Paul Darrow's character Avon, and then after he died as
a remake / reboot. The latest rumour, supposedly confirming a reboot
attempt, was in January 2026 and involves Doctor Who director Peter
Hoar.
I doubt a "Blake's 7" reboot would be much good, based on other TV
shows that have tried it... so I'm happy with the Big Finish novels for
my B7 fix! (Some of which are actually quite good.)
Let's not have our memories tainted, leave the show in the grave.
On 2026-05-15 16:40:25 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
On 2026-05-14 12:01:37 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 14/05/2026 3:47 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/05/2026 18:04, Blueshirt wrote:
Now, "Blake's 7", that's dead, so nobody bothers discussing that!
Blake's 7 killed off all of its cast members except Servalan/Slear so >>>>> why would anyone want to talk about it when none of them can ever >>>>> return?
Hey, problem solved... the "Blake's 7" crew can regenerate so they can >>>> become a NEW, IMPROVED "Blake's 7"
There have been rumours of a new Blake's 7 show - first as a sequel
series starring Paul Darrow's character Avon, and then after he died as >>> a remake / reboot. The latest rumour, supposedly confirming a reboot
attempt, was in January 2026 and involves Doctor Who director Peter
Hoar.
I doubt a "Blake's 7" reboot would be much good, based on other TV
shows that have tried it... so I'm happy with the Big Finish novels for
my B7 fix! (Some of which are actually quite good.)
Let's not have our memories tainted, leave the show in the grave.
Reboots are NEVER any good. Even revivals and spin-offs rarely work.
That's partly because the new idiot in charge always has such a massive
ego that they believe they know better then the creative person who
actually originated the idea. It has also never ever made any sense to >re-use the original's name for a "new version" that is barely
recognisable.
Reboots, revivals, and even spin-offs rarely last very long.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 62:52:44 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
10 files (20,373K bytes) |
| Messages: | 264,051 |