• Re: Disney's Losing the Rights to Mickey Mouse, and That's Not the Weirdest Part of the Story

    From Transheuser-Busch@transheuser-busch@gmail.com to alt.disney,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,rec.arts.disney.parks,sac.politics,talk.politics.guns on Sun Jul 2 12:30:00 2023
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.disney.parks

    On 16 Feb 2022, Biden sucks <jthomq@gmail.com> posted some news:suk3ko$1ckgp$134@news.freedyn.de:

    Go woke, be broke and bankrupt.

    Disney is set to lose its rights to Mickey Mouse in 2024, and a potential
    new owner is already lying in wait.

    Did you hear it? If youAre totally quiet, you can hear it. ItAs the dark, sinister, and maniacal laughter of the villain from any of DisneyAs
    classic feature-length animated films. You hear it now, donAt you?

    In news reminiscent of that from early 1928, Disney is set to lose its
    rights to the beloved Mickey Mouse in 2024, just two short years from now.
    and the enterprise poised to catch him just as he is loosed from his
    Disney birthplace is doing so only out of spiteunot for the Mouseubut for everything the Mouse represents.

    A company called MSCHF has launched its own version of Mickey Mouse. And
    itAs scary. Its version isnAt referred to as Mickey, and the likeness is
    not quite MickeyAs either. ItAs more of a copy and an idea rolled into
    one.

    Fans and non-fans alike are invited to purchase a token that looks like a mouse. The so-called oX Famous Mouseo serves as more of a placeholder that
    can be bought today for $100 and redeemed in 2024 when Disney no longer
    owns the rights to Mickey. Once redeemed, the owner will receive an actual collectible piece of artwork.

    ItAs the copyright for DisneyAs Steamboat Willie that is set to expire on January 1, 2024. Once the copyright expires, the character of the famous mouse, as he appeared in the animated short, will be part of the public domain. That is unless Disney can pull a fast one as the company did in
    1988.

    Faced with a similar fate in the late 80s, Disney bypassed any potential riff-raff and went straight to the federal government for help, lobbying Congress in an effort to extend its copyright on Mickey. Whether it was DisneyAs powerhouse persona or a Congress full of Mickey fans, we arenAt
    sure. But the lobbying worked, and the copyright was extended.

    But, as with all good things, the copyright is coming to an end. The so-
    called oMickey Mouse Protection Act,o or, as it is more formally known,
    the Copyright Term Extension Act, only extended the rights so long, and in 2024, the extension of the protection will be terminated.

    MSCHF explains that it feels Disney is a omultinational behemoth, able to change national laws to suit the interests of a cartoon mouseo and that
    the entertainment giant is also oa massive all-swallowing conglomerate,
    with a desire for both industry dominance and cultural hegemony.o

    The company further says that we must oleap at the chance to take back
    even the scant morsels available to us; at the slightest chance we must
    eat them alive.o

    So it would seem that MSCHF wants the rights to Mickey, not to continue to
    see his notoriety blossom and bloom or further his legacy, but rather to
    mock him and the company he represents for being such a power-hungry oconglomerate.o Got it.

    But if Disney did it once, couldnAt they do it again? CouldnAt they lobby Congress or write a letter to the President or pay a hefty sum of money to
    see that the copyright doesnAt expire? That remains to be seen.

    And if Disney is successful in securing some kind of staying power on its Mickey copyright, MSCHF is ready for that too, saying that it will move
    along with the extension, should one be granted.

    Catching the mouse seems to be the name of the game for MSCHFAs CEO, Gabe Whaley, who says his company is making the most of a loophole in the
    copyright law.

    oFamous Mouse is using the idea of conceptual art as a copyright
    loophole,o he explained. oCopyright is always a game of loopholes.o

    A loophole led to the demise of WaltAs beloved Oswald the Lucky Rabbit in early 1928. The long-eared bunny ended up the property of Universal
    Pictures, thanks to a contract loophole, a sneaky distributor, and some less-than-loyal studio staff members.

    Could it happen again in 2024? ItAs possible.

    Whaley explains, oThis is a roundabout way to get the mouse out early.o

    https://www.disneydining.com/disneys-losing-the-rights-to-mickey-and- thats-not-the-weirdest-part-of-the-story-bb1/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2