• Dilbert: Revised Standard Employment Agreement

    From Lynn McGuire@lynnmcguire5@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.written,rec.arts.comics.strips on Fri Apr 10 15:14:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.comics.strips

    Dilbert: Revised Standard Employment Agreement
    https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/1996-02-15

    Most Excellent ! I need to do this !

    Hat tip to:
    https://www.reddit.com/r/dilbert/comments/1shdzs6/the_dil_side/

    Lynn

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Cryptoengineer@petertrei@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.written,rec.arts.comics.strips on Sat Apr 11 14:10:21 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.comics.strips

    On 4/10/2026 4:14 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    Dilbert: Revised Standard Employment Agreement
    -a-a https://dilbert-viewer.herokuapp.com/1996-02-15

    Most Excellent !-a I need to do this !

    Hat tip to:
    -a-a https://www.reddit.com/r/dilbert/comments/1shdzs6/the_dil_side/

    I was once at a small SW company that tried to pull something like
    this - they tried to trick us into signing an employment agreement
    which would forbid us from ever working for a competitor, and
    similarly bind our spouses and adult children . Also, that we had
    no NDAs active with any of our former employers, and so could use
    any information we had from them in the company's products.

    The problem was that people actually started to read the agreements,
    despite them being characterized as 'minor paperwork, just sign and
    hand back' and very quickly started to object, loudly.

    After about an hour, I went to my manager and explained that I
    would have to resign: As part of my security clearance at a former
    job, I had a life-long, irrevocable NDA with the US Government.

    I was the only cryptography guy the company had, and this would
    halted a major project.

    The agreements were withdrawn from everyone. No one signed.

    pt






    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2