From Newsgroup: rec.arts.books
So I see a bad link in the beginning of the wikipedia
article on the book I Chose Freedom (1947), that
claims to point to a New York Times review of the
book; I'm aware of later references by the NYT
that dismisses the book as "cold war era" literature,
which made me want to see the original review.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Chose_Freedom
Here is the first result of a Bing.com search for:
I Chose Freedom "new york times" review
Health influencers sell themselves as iconoclasts, but many have cozy,
uncritical relationships with the rich and powerful. The president shows,
once again, that he shouldnrCOt be anywhere near the Oval. New York
Times Opinion columnists, editorials and guest essays.
And Google.com for the same search term says that
this link is a New York Times review:
https://sites.google.com/site/newyorkcityapril1946/books/book-reviews-this-week-in-1946/i-chose-freedom-reviewed-by-the-nyt
Which is not the language of the New York Times or
Kravchenko in style or content. Google has simply
taken the assumption that all headlines and titles
are true representations of content, which anyone
with News Literacy knows is not true.
By the way, Wikipedia has taken money from Google
in exchange for altering content, which makes
wikipedia's advertising for donations to be
deceptive, giving the "illusion of public support".
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2