1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. nz.politics

  • Re: UN Security Council Reformation

    From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to can.politics,alt.politics.org.un,nz.politics on Wed Apr 1 23:03:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: nz.politics

    On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 22:50:23 -0000 (UTC), Dhu on Gate wrote:

    Does seven permanent seats means a majority can move ahead?

    Would make the veto power even more of a stumbling block.

    Unless you dilute the veto power at the same time -- suppose it takes
    at least two permanent members to vote rCLnorCY for a veto, instead of
    one.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2