From Newsgroup: nz.general

So, our Efc|Efc+ Parliament joins the growing list of groups abandoning Elon MuskrCOs tainted social-media platform <https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360941546/nz-parliament-announces-it-will-no-longer-post-x>.

But our Foreign Minister isnrCOt happy. Perhaps he doesnrCOt appreciate
the seriousness of the material that X is tolerating on its feeds
these days. (Not wanting to be associated with potential criminal
activity is called rCLvirtue signallingrCY now ...)

There are other platforms that could be worth looking at. For example, Mastdodon and other nodes of the Fediverse, and places like Bluesky.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: nz.general

On 20.02.2026 06:37 Uhr Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:

But our Foreign Minister isnrCOt happy. Perhaps he doesnrCOt appreciate
the seriousness of the material that X is tolerating on its feeds
these days. (Not wanting to be associated with potential criminal
activity is called rCLvirtue signallingrCY now ...)

Then they should leave the internet at all, as there are always people
doing crimes there.

There are other platforms that could be worth looking at. For example, Mastdodon and other nodes of the Fediverse, and places like Bluesky.

I assume this will not work, as too less people are using those
services.
--
kind regards
Marco
Send spam to 1771565878muell@stinkedores.dorfdsl.de
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: nz.general

On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 16:17:27 +0100, Marco Moock wrote:

On 20.02.2026 06:37 Uhr Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:

But our Foreign Minister isnrCOt happy. Perhaps he doesnrCOt appreciate
the seriousness of the material that X is tolerating on its feeds
these days. (Not wanting to be associated with potential criminal
activity is called rCLvirtue signallingrCY now ...)

Then they should leave the internet at all, as there are always
people doing crimes there.

Strawman?
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: nz.general

On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 06:37:58 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:

So, our Efc|Efc+ Parliament joins the growing list of groups abandoning Elon MuskrCOs tainted social-media platform <https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360941546/nz-parliament-announces-it-will-no-longer-post-x>.

But our Foreign Minister isnrCOt happy.

Followup article <https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360942425/parliaments-exit-caused-stir-most-government-departments-have-already-left>
finds a bunch of other Efc|Efc+ Government agencies gave up on the Muskian cesspit a long time ago. Peters -- both his Foreign Ministry and his
NZ First Party -- are still among the regular users, so perhaps itrCOs
not surprising herCOs not happy about others leaving him behind.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: nz.general

In article <10nj71k$3ia0b$1@dont-email.me>, ldo@nz.invalid says...

On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 06:37:58 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:

So, our ?? Parliament joins the growing list of groups abandoning Elon Musk?s tainted social-media platform <https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360941546/nz-parliament-announces-it-will-no-longer-post-x>.

But our Foreign Minister isn?t happy.

Followup article <https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360942425/parliaments-exit-caused-stir-most-government-departments-have-already-left>
finds a bunch of other ?? Government agencies gave up on the Muskian
cesspit a long time ago. Peters -- both his Foreign Ministry and his
NZ First Party -- are still among the regular users, so perhaps it?s
not surprising he?s not happy about others leaving him behind.

There is no reason goverments should have social media acounts at all,
these are private companies like newspapers and tv channels were in the
past, and public legacy media (as it is called now) in countries with no public oversight was often used for propaganda purposes, so it was of
little help to citizens or taxpayers.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: nz.general

On Fri, 27 Feb 2026 03:22:06 +0100, Vanadium wrote:

There is no reason goverments should have social media acounts at
all ...

Those of us who live in democracies do prefer our elected
representatives to keep us in the loop from time to time over what
theyrCOre doing in our name.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: nz.general

Lawrence DrCOOliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:

On Fri, 27 Feb 2026 03:22:06 +0100, Vanadium wrote:

There is no reason goverments should have social media acounts at
all ...

Those of us who live in democracies do prefer our elected
representatives to keep us in the loop from time to time over what
theyrCOre doing in our name.

That can be achieved without using social media platforms. Mailing
lists still work, for example.

(I donrCOt object to governments having social media accounts in
principle, but itrCOs absolutely not the only option, and some of the
available choices are sufficiently awful that a presence on them carries
a reputational risk.)
--
https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: nz.general

Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?= <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

On Fri, 27 Feb 2026 03:22:06 +0100, Vanadium wrote:

There is no reason goverments should have social media acounts at
all ...

Those of us who live in democracies do prefer our elected
representatives to keep us in the loop from time to time over what
theyre doing in our name.

Two different things: the government itself and elected representatives.
I'm happy for my senator or mayor to have a social media account to talk
about what they are doing with my tax money. I'm not sure I am happy about individual government agencies to be promoting themselves via social media.

On the gripping hand it's nice to see things like solar weather reports
from NOAA and announcements about NASA launches coming out via social media since that's where people look today.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: nz.general

In article <10nr1dr$268jc$1@dont-email.me>, ldo@nz.invalid says...

On Fri, 27 Feb 2026 03:22:06 +0100, Vanadium wrote:

There is no reason goverments should have social media acounts at
all ...

Those of us who live in democracies do prefer our elected
representatives to keep us in the loop from time to time over what
they?re doing in our name.

I certainly live in a european democracy, but rest assured Musk's X manipulated algorithm is not.

We need more neutral information spaces. I suscribe to the EFF recommendations.
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2