1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. nz.general

  • Try again Auckland

    From Gordon@Gordon@leaf.net.nz to nz.general on Thu Feb 19 04:44:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: nz.general

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/587326/opposition-parties-react-to-auckland-housing-u-turn

    Reading that article seems to me that the leaders need to get back to the drawing board.

    It seems we/they do not have a process to show a long term area for the increase area of houses.

    Seems been done in a bit of a rush.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BR@blah@blah.blah to nz.general on Fri Feb 20 04:58:12 2026
    From Newsgroup: nz.general

    On 19 Feb 2026 04:44:10 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/587326/opposition-parties-react-to-auckland-housing-u-turn

    Reading that article seems to me that the leaders need to get back to the >drawing board.

    It seems we/they do not have a process to show a long term area for the >increase area of houses.

    Seems been done in a bit of a rush.

    We don't need any more housing in Auckland. There is already too much.

    Bill.
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Crash@nogood@dontbother.invalid to nz.general on Fri Feb 20 12:38:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: nz.general

    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 04:58:12 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On 19 Feb 2026 04:44:10 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/587326/opposition-parties-react-to-auckland-housing-u-turn

    Reading that article seems to me that the leaders need to get back to the >>drawing board.

    It seems we/they do not have a process to show a long term area for the >>increase area of houses.

    Seems been done in a bit of a rush.

    We don't need any more housing in Auckland. There is already too much.

    Bill.

    Then why are new houses being built? Who is buying them if there is
    no need for them?
    --
    Crash McBash
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BR@blah@blah.blah to nz.general on Sun Feb 22 05:57:32 2026
    From Newsgroup: nz.general

    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:38:43 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 04:58:12 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On 19 Feb 2026 04:44:10 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/587326/opposition-parties-react-to-auckland-housing-u-turn

    Reading that article seems to me that the leaders need to get back to the >>>drawing board.

    It seems we/they do not have a process to show a long term area for the >>>increase area of houses.

    Seems been done in a bit of a rush.

    We don't need any more housing in Auckland. There is already too much.

    Bill.

    Then why are new houses being built?

    Some are being built by the government. That's the worst part of it.

    Who is buying them if there is no need for them?

    I suspect immigrants, of which there are also too many.

    Let's put it this way: There is either too much housing or not enough
    roads.

    There would be on average about one car for every dwelling.

    The response from the Auckland council has been to create traffic
    bottlenecks and other obstructions, and if this is not addressed,
    there will always be too much housing in auckland.

    Bill.
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2