• Re: Thank goodness for CO2.

    From Gordon@Gordon@leaf.net.nz to nz.general on Mon Feb 16 03:35:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: nz.general

    On 2026-02-15, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/1089/2026/
    More trees because of the tiny increase - hey isn't that what nature does?

    This once again shows that Nature does respond to the changing conditions.

    No need to rush in response to the changes as the media keeps suggesting,
    just a case of the forest can move a little further North 60KM in 34 years.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tony@lizandtony@orcon.net.nz to nz.general on Mon Feb 16 18:24:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: nz.general

    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    On 2026-02-15, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/23/1089/2026/
    More trees because of the tiny increase - hey isn't that what nature does?

    This once again shows that Nature does respond to the changing conditions.

    No need to rush in response to the changes as the media keeps suggesting, >just a case of the forest can move a little further North 60KM in 34 years. Agreed, but not just the media.
    See this https://waikanaewatch.org/2026/02/17/the-disastrous-conversion-of-fertile-agricultural-land-into-pine-monocultures/
    Commerce and governments are part of the rort, and a rort it clearly is. Man-made climate change is a scam and most governments around the world are either fooled by it or complicit, which of those is true of our government?
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2