From Newsgroup: nz.general

ACT leader David Seymour, responding to the GreensrCO campaign promise
to pause the construction of new AI data centres: rCLI think that policy
itself may be the product of AI.rCY

Is he saying thatrCOs a good thing, to use AI, or bad?
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: nz.general

On Sun, 26 Jul 2026, Lawrence DOliveiro?= <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

ACT leader David Seymour, responding to the GreensrCO campaign promise
to pause the construction of new AI data centres: rCLI think that policy >itself may be the product of AI.rCY

Is he saying thatrCOs a good thing, to use AI, or bad?

The Greens are insane, so the good/bad scale doesn't really apply.
Here's a question for Loony Lawrence: the Greens used to have a policy
of two co-leaders, a man and a woman. Now they have two loony women
at the helm. The question is, Would they accept two men at the helm?
Moreover, are there actually two normal men in the Green party at all?
All I see are retards.

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: nz.general

On Sun, 26 Jul 2026 08:51:02 GMT, Willy Nilly wrote:

On Sun, 26 Jul 2026, Lawrence DOliveiro?= <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

ACT leader David Seymour, responding to the GreensrCO campaign
promise to pause the construction of new AI data centres: rCLI think
that policy itself may be the product of AI.rCY

Is he saying thatrCOs a good thing, to use AI, or bad?

The Greens are insane ...

So was he trying to put down the Greens by suggesting they were using
AI?

I thought he was in favour of these AI data centres that the Greens
are trying to block/delay ...
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2