From Newsgroup: nz.general

So, after Blowhard Brian spouted some incitements to violence online,
he got raided by the cops, who took away his guns and revoked his
licence to have them <https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/auckland/police-seize-destiny-church-leader-brian-tamakis-firearms-and-revoke-gun-licence-after-incendiary-online-comments/BPC2WWUWZVGZHHPHZXCTVLS2Z4/>.

Interestingly, it was an ACT MP who owned up to complaining to the
police about him. But I thought the ACT folks were pro-gun? How do
they feel about being responsible for some so-called rCLlaw-abiding
citizenrCY losing their freedom to brandish weaponry?

(Not to mention being pro-rCLfreedom-of-speechrCY ... seems there are
limits to that among right-wingers, eh?)
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: nz.general

On 2026-06-29, Lawrence DrCOOliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

So, after Blowhard Brian spouted some incitements to violence online,
he got raided by the cops, who took away his guns and revoked his
licence to have them
<https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/auckland/police-seize-destiny-church-leader-brian-tamakis-firearms-and-revoke-gun-licence-after-incendiary-online-comments/BPC2WWUWZVGZHHPHZXCTVLS2Z4/>.

Interestingly, it was an ACT MP who owned up to complaining to the
police about him. But I thought the ACT folks were pro-gun?

But maybe not pro-violence.

How do
they feel about being responsible for some so-called rCLlaw-abiding citizenrCY losing their freedom to brandish weaponry?

Pretty good is it reduces the chances of a death.

(Not to mention being pro-rCLfreedom-of-speechrCY ... seems there are
limits to that among right-wingers, eh?)

Yes, The Freedom of speech does have limits.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2