From Newsgroup: news.groups

On 3/15/2024 7:41 AM, Johanne Fairchild wrote:

You know, people called it the BREXIT. We should have a name for the
Google exit from USENET. GEXIT? How about GGREXIT? :-) It's now part
of USENET history and we're the true writers.

I like the sound of GGREXIT, but not the spelling. Maybe GEXIT is
better overall.

GGexit?
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: news.groups

On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:01:15 -0700
HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> wrote:

On 3/15/2024 7:41 AM, Johanne Fairchild wrote:

You know, people called it the BREXIT. We should have a name for
the Google exit from USENET. GEXIT? How about GGREXIT? :-) It's
now part of USENET history and we're the true writers.

I like the sound of GGREXIT, but not the spelling. Maybe GEXIT is
better overall.

GGexit?

Skynet bails.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: news.groups

useful eater <use@full.invalid> wrote at 20:20 this Saturday (GMT):

On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:01:15 -0700
HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> wrote:

On 3/15/2024 7:41 AM, Johanne Fairchild wrote:

You know, people called it the BREXIT. We should have a name for
the Google exit from USENET. GEXIT? How about GGREXIT? :-) It's
now part of USENET history and we're the true writers.

I like the sound of GGREXIT, but not the spelling. Maybe GEXIT is
better overall.

GGexit?

Skynet bails.

Ah cmon. At least skynet was obvious with how evil it was.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: news.groups

candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
writes:

useful eater <use@full.invalid> wrote at 20:20 this Saturday (GMT):

On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:01:15 -0700
HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> wrote:

On 3/15/2024 7:41 AM, Johanne Fairchild wrote:

You know, people called it the BREXIT. We should have a name for
the Google exit from USENET. GEXIT? How about GGREXIT? :-) It's
now part of USENET history and we're the true writers.

I like the sound of GGREXIT, but not the spelling. Maybe GEXIT is
better overall.

GGexit?

Skynet bails.

Ah cmon. At least skynet was obvious with how evil it was.

AFAIK they never specified why Skynet wanted to kill all humans. It's
possible that it had valid reasons, you know.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: news.groups

Schlomo Goldberg <schlomo.goldberg@mailinator.com> wrote:

AFAIK they never specified why Skynet wanted to kill all humans. It's >possible that it had valid reasons, you know.

Normal compatibility reasons. Humans aren't IBM standard.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: news.groups

Schlomo Goldberg <schlomo.goldberg@mailinator.com> wrote at 20:27 this Thursday (GMT):

candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
writes:

useful eater <use@full.invalid> wrote at 20:20 this Saturday (GMT):

On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:01:15 -0700
HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> wrote:

On 3/15/2024 7:41 AM, Johanne Fairchild wrote:

You know, people called it the BREXIT. We should have a name for
the Google exit from USENET. GEXIT? How about GGREXIT? :-) It's
now part of USENET history and we're the true writers.

I like the sound of GGREXIT, but not the spelling. Maybe GEXIT is
better overall.

GGexit?

Skynet bails.

Ah cmon. At least skynet was obvious with how evil it was.

AFAIK they never specified why Skynet wanted to kill all humans. It's possible that it had valid reasons, you know.

I feel like it's kinda implied, considering how awful we are to most
things.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2