• Re: 2nd RFD: Remove comp.unix.sys5.misc and comp.unix.sys5.r4

    From Steve Bonine@spb@pobox.com to news.groups on Thu Nov 20 18:38:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: news.groups

    According to the headers I see in news.groups.proposals, this was
    crossposted to news.groups. But I don't see it in news.groups. Perhaps
    a personal problem.

    Usenet Big-8 Management Board wrote:
    This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) to remove the following unmoderated newsgroups.

    comp.unix.sys5.misc
    comp.unix.sys5.r4
    ...
    Adam Kerman and Steve Bonine both consider the proposed changes a "make- work" activity that achieves nothing useful.

    This may well be a first in the history of Usenet, that it is documented
    that Adam and Steve agree on something.

    I count 29 newsgroups in the comp.unix hierarchy. I see here a proposal
    to remove two of them with this rationale:

    I propose to delete groups that are not used well and to direct the
    people to more general groups like comp.unix.misc in case they want to discuss the topics they special groups covered.

    (Not sure who "I" is since the item was published by "Usenet Big-8
    Management Board".)

    Here are two newsgoups out of 29 which, by definition, "are not well
    used". Removing them will divert the activity there, which doesn't
    exist, into the remaining 27 comp.unix newsgroups.

    This is a classic example of "'make-work' activity that achieves nothing useful".

    I hear that the position of FidoNet Zone Coordinator is open. Perhaps
    you can take over the NodeList and remove systems from it.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2