• Amateur Peering

    From IntraNIC@intranicnetwork@gmail.com to news.admin.peering on Thu Sep 17 08:54:20 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering

    I'm new to running a newsgroup (INN) server, and am looking for peering, preferably with other amateurs!

    Info: My feed is an FTN to Usenet bridge

    If interested, email me, and we can exchange info.

    intranicnetwork@gmail.com

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roberto CORRADO@i@secure.corradoroberto.it to news.admin.peering on Thu Sep 17 18:32:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering

    "IntraNIC" wrote:
    preferably with other amateurs!
    I have send you a email but now not have a fidonet group.
    --
    Roberto CORRADO
    news.corradoroberto.it
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From IntraNIC@intranicnetwork@gmail.com to news.admin.peering on Thu Sep 17 09:41:44 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering

    On 9/17/2026 9:32 AM, Roberto CORRADO wrote:
    "IntraNIC" wrote:

    preferably with other amateurs!
    I have send you a email but now not have a fidonet group.

    Thank you for your email. I'll get things setup today. I sent the info
    you need in my email reply.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ivo Gandolfo@usenet@bofh.team to news.admin.peering on Thu Sep 17 21:02:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering

    Il 17/09/2026 17:54, IntraNIC ha scritto:
    I'm new to running a newsgroup (INN) server, and am looking for peering, preferably with other amateurs!

    Info: My feed is an FTN to Usenet bridge

    If interested, email me, and we can exchange info.

    intranicnetwork@gmail.com

    Hi IntraNIC,

    you can find details here https://www.bofh.team/info.txt

    Just send me you side when ready, and witch group's you want to peer and
    I setup the feed accordingly.


    Sincerely
    --
    Ivo Gandolfo
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Madison@madison.brooks@skeetchestn.ca to news.admin.peering on Thu Sep 17 13:47:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering

    On 9/17/2026 12:02 PM, Ivo Gandolfo wrote:
    Il 17/09/2026 17:54, IntraNIC ha scritto:
    I'm new to running a newsgroup (INN) server, and am looking for
    peering, preferably with other amateurs!

    Info: My feed is an FTN to Usenet bridge

    If interested, email me, and we can exchange info.

    intranicnetwork@gmail.com

    Hi IntraNIC,

    you can find details here https://www.bofh.team/info.txt

    Just send me you side when ready, and witch group's you want to peer and
    I setup the feed accordingly.


    Sincerely

    Do you carry fido7.*? Can you carry our fido.*?
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ivo Gandolfo@usenet@bofh.team to news.admin.peering on Thu Sep 17 23:29:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering

    Il 17/09/2026 22:47, Madison ha scritto:
    Do you carry fido7.*? Can you carry our fido.*?

    ivo@paganini:~$ cat /var/lib/news/active | grep "fido." | wc -l
    3511
    ivo@paganini:~$ cat /var/lib/news/active | grep "fido7." | wc -l
    3259
    ivo@paganini:~$

    I think so


    Sincerely
    --
    Ivo Gandolfo
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Madison@madison.brooks@skeetchestn.ca to news.admin.peering on Thu Sep 17 14:48:41 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering

    On 9/17/2026 2:29 PM, Ivo Gandolfo wrote:
    Il 17/09/2026 22:47, Madison ha scritto:
    Do you carry fido7.*? Can you carry our fido.*?

    ivo@paganini:~$ cat /var/lib/news/active | grep "fido." | wc -l
    3511
    ivo@paganini:~$ cat /var/lib/news/active | grep "fido7." | wc -l
    3259
    ivo@paganini:~$

    I think so

    Perfect, I think I've got you setup here. Our info and active files are
    here: http://intranic.su.gy/usenet.php
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nigel Reed@sysop@endofthelinebbs.com to news.admin.peering on Fri Sep 18 12:44:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering

    On Thu, 17 Sep 2026 08:54:20 -0700
    IntraNIC <intranicnetwork@gmail.com> wrote:

    I'm new to running a newsgroup (INN) server, and am looking for
    peering, preferably with other amateurs!

    Info: My feed is an FTN to Usenet bridge

    If interested, email me, and we can exchange info.

    intranicnetwork@gmail.com


    Are you only gating fidonet groups that specifically allow gating? Many expressly forbid it, or only allow with mod approval. Some are already
    gated.
    --
    End Of The Line BBS - Plano, TX
    telnet endofthelinebbs.com 23


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nigel Reed@sysop@endofthelinebbs.com to news.admin.peering on Fri Sep 18 12:58:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering

    On Thu, 17 Sep 2026 14:48:41 -0700
    Madison <madison.brooks@skeetchestn.ca> wrote:

    http://intranic.su.gy/usenet.php

    I would advise people not to be part of this

    fido.linux 0000000000 0000000001 y
    GATEway: *NO* Usenet backbone gating

    I'm also pretty sure enet.sysops shouldn't be exposed to non-sysops
    either.

    Same for SYSOPS (there is no SYSOPS on fidonet that I can find).
    --
    End Of The Line BBS - Plano, TX
    telnet endofthelinebbs.com 23


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From IntraNIC intranicnetwork@"IntraNIC intranicnetwork"@gmail.com to news.admin.peering on Fri Sep 18 10:47:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering



    Are you only gating fidonet groups that specifically allow gating? Many expressly forbid it, or only allow with mod approval. Some are already
    gated.


    We don't gate Fidonet. Fidogate operates on it's own domain and zones.
    If a group wants to gate, they would need to share a message base. We
    don't actually do that ourselves.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roberto CORRADO@i@secure.corradoroberto.it to news.admin.peering on Fri Sep 18 20:52:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering

    "IntraNIC" wrote:
    Thank you for your email. I'll get things setup today. I sent the info > you need in my email reply.
    I have recived you email with information of remove my peer, i have applicate your choice, peer removed now.
    Thank you
    --
    Roberto.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From noel@deletethis@invalid.lan to news.admin.peering on Sat Sep 19 11:18:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering

    On Fri, 18 Sep 2026 12:44:27 -0500, Nigel Reed wrote:

    Are you only gating fidonet groups that specifically allow gating? Many expressly forbid it, or only allow with mod approval. Some are already
    gated.

    Fido's rules are and always have been archaic, I ran a BBS back in late 80s/90's (Ezycom under DOS/Desqview/Qemm) and i think it was 91 or 92
    added this new thing called "the internet" with tcp trumpet sock or
    something similarly named to allow logins - back then it more of a play
    thing since Peter said Ezycom update facilitates it, boy those were the
    days we had compuserve on a super blazingly fast best-thing-to-ever-
    happen 2400bps modem line :)

    the zone "kommandant" regulary objected to us allowing logins - on the internet line, whilst the other dialup line was always in its hourly
    reserved netmail hour (4-5AM here), I argued with the kommandant for
    several weeks on why I should lock everyone out when the dedicated dialup
    was complying, I fulfilled my netmail obligations keeping the dialup
    free, he knows that because our "discussion" was all via netmail :) he
    cut me off 3 times over period of a year for that until he moved to
    terminate my node altogether.

    I then got a direct (IIRC called a point node) arrangement from John (everybody knows John in Zone 1, also went on to run a fair size ISP in
    the US from what I heard in later years) I had all my feeds and netmail
    from him via the internet (until I closed the BBS in late 90's - it ran
    for about 12 years all up).

    Over the following 2 or 3 years, my story was repeated several times over
    by other BBS's here, but they just ended Fidonet rather than seeking
    other access.

    Some people insist in living in the stone ages, and Fido doesnt seem to
    have realised its own policies are whats seen its demise, like this,
    forbidden to gate areas, thats right forbid them, heaven forbid people discover Fidonet by finding their discussions on usenet, not advertise
    and prevent others discovering them - not that I can imagine there being
    many in 2026 anyway but I confess to not giving a damn enough to go
    looking :)


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Fae Empress@admin@mail.su.gy to news.admin.peering on Sat Sep 19 15:51:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering

    On 2026-09-18 6:18 p.m., noel wrote:

    Some people insist in living in the stone ages, and Fido doesnt seem to
    have realised its own policies are whats seen its demise, like this, forbidden to gate areas, thats right forbid them, heaven forbid people discover Fidonet by finding their discussions on usenet, not advertise
    and prevent others discovering them - not that I can imagine there being
    many in 2026 anyway but I confess to not giving a damn enough to go
    looking :)

    A couple years back I was working on a Fediverse (Mastodon, Friendica,
    etc.) bridge into a test FTN and it worked great. Groups were based on #hashtags. Unfortunately, there were WAY too many posts coming
    into the groups and I had to shut it down.

    Fidonet can remain dead for all I care, but I don't see a reason that
    other networks can't grow and evolve.

    I think connecting to something more forum based, ie. Lemmy, might be
    a better option rather than a hashtag based system.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From IntraNIC@intranicnetwork@gmail.com to news.admin.peering on Sat Sep 19 18:09:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering

    On 2026-09-18 10:58 a.m., Nigel Reed wrote:
    On Thu, 17 Sep 2026 14:48:41 -0700
    Madison <madison.brooks@skeetchestn.ca> wrote:

    http://intranic.su.gy/usenet.php

    I would advise people not to be part of this

    fido.linux 0000000000 0000000001 y
    GATEway: *NO* Usenet backbone gating

    I'm also pretty sure enet.sysops shouldn't be exposed to non-sysops
    either.

    Same for SYSOPS (there is no SYSOPS on fidonet that I can find).

    Ok, I'll switch everything over to realms.* and rename the FTN to
    RealmsNet (original from my 1994 BBS).

    I assume there is no one using realms.* hierarchy?
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From noel@deletethis@invalid.lan to news.admin.peering on Sun Sep 20 11:17:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering

    On Sat, 19 Sep 2026 15:51:25 -0700, Fae Empress wrote:

    On 2026-09-18 6:18 p.m., noel wrote:

    Some people insist in living in the stone ages, and Fido doesnt seem to
    have realised its own policies are whats seen its demise, like this,
    forbidden to gate areas, thats right forbid them, heaven forbid people
    discover Fidonet by finding their discussions on usenet, not advertise
    and prevent others discovering them - not that I can imagine there
    being many in 2026 anyway but I confess to not giving a damn enough to
    go looking :)

    A couple years back I was working on a Fediverse (Mastodon, Friendica,
    etc.) bridge into a test FTN and it worked great. Groups were based on #hashtags. Unfortunately, there were WAY too many posts coming into the groups and I had to shut it down.

    Fidonet can remain dead for all I care, but I don't see a reason that
    other networks can't grow and evolve.

    I think connecting to something more forum based, ie. Lemmy, might be a better option rather than a hashtag based system.

    I always more or less considered usenet as Fidonets replacement, because before usenet, thats what we used, problem with forums is, in what I've
    seen in the past, html code in posts - html is blocked here, if I want to waste storage and have 75K articles instead of 3K, I'll re-enable
    binaries before allowing html :)
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From noel@deletethis@invalid.lan to news.admin.peering on Sun Sep 20 11:28:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering

    On Sat, 19 Sep 2026 18:09:07 -0700, IntraNIC wrote:


    Ok, I'll switch everything over to realms.* and rename the FTN to
    RealmsNet (original from my 1994 BBS).

    I assume there is no one using realms.* hierarchy?

    /usr/local/dnews# grep -c realms control.conf
    0

    grep -cE '^realms' active.dat
    0
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2