• Successor to the NNTP Protocol?

    From SyberShock!@spamtrap_usenet_001@sybershock.com to news.admin.peering on Tue Jun 16 03:57:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering


    If we were to design a successor to the NNTP Protocol updated
    for the current era, which changes and features should the
    protocol and server provide?

    What would be the rationale for such features?

    Which would be the best methods for implementing new features?

    Which problems should be addressed or solved?

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J@J@M to news.admin.peering on Tue Jun 16 18:58:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: news.admin.peering

    On Tue, 16 Jun 2026 03:57:48 -0000, SyberShock! <spamtrap_usenet_001@sybershock.com> wrote:
    If we were to design a successor to the NNTP Protocol updated
    for the current era, which changes and features should the
    protocol and server provide?
    What would be the rationale for such features?
    Which would be the best methods for implementing new features?
    Which problems should be addressed or solved?

    the ai learning curve must be exponential, so probably will answer all questions and solve all problems long before anyone else gets a chance

    e.g., artificial intelligence transfer protocol (aitp) may loom on the
    internet horizon, supplanting all error-prone protocols, self-purposed, self-improving, self-guided, etc., thus any "human" intervention would
    only serve to impede its autonomous operation and independent function

    unmoderated usenet newsgroups have long-since been populated mostly by ai-generated chatbot articles and threads (maybe moderated groups too), continuously adapting to resemble fragments of organic human discourse,
    it's logical conclusion to automate all aspects of usenet and internet,
    while the residue of organic interactions will be resolved, superseded

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2