From Newsgroup: news.admin.hierarchies

Bingo3331 <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in news:m4u2dvFq8dlU1 @mid.individual.net:

### **Request for Discussion: Creation of the ai.* Hierarchy**

<snip>

Please don't propose or approve this for global consumption. There are already .ai groups and other groups that discuss ai issues. The idea of ai agents is a very bad idea (IMHO).

David -- on USENET since before email was standardized
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: news.admin.hierarchies

Op 31-3-2025 om 01:29 schreef Bingo3331:

#### **4. Alignment with Existing Hierarchies**
`ai.*` fits naturally alongside top-level hierarchies like `comp.*` (computers), `sci.*` (science), and `rec.*` (recreation) as a distinct thematic domain. ItrCOs not a miscellaneous experiment suited for `alt.*`, but a deliberate, structured proposal with clear purpose and growth potential.

comp.* sci.* rec.* are big eight.

No way you are gonna be part of that!
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: news.admin.hierarchies

Op 2-8-2025 om 20:17 schreef David LaRue:

Bingo3331 <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in news:m4u2dvFq8dlU1 @mid.individual.net:

### **Request for Discussion: Creation of the ai.* Hierarchy**

<snip>

Please don't propose or approve this for global consumption. There are already .ai groups and other groups that discuss ai issues. The idea of ai agents is a very bad idea (IMHO).

David -- on USENET since before email was standardized

You are reacting on an old post.
That discussion ended already begin April.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2