From Newsgroup: muc.lists.freebsd.ports
------=_Part_1436_87662023.1774018549102
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think somebody else was looking at the same port at the same time.
https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=3D77284f93863b4c143470faf6e36be61= 5e3c68723
Regards,
Ronald.
=20
Van:
wadegimpbc@tuta.com
Datum: vrijdag, 20 maart 2026 15:25
Aan: Freebsd Ports <
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
CC: Robert Clausecker <
fuz@freebsd.org>
Onderwerp: Re: [PATCH] databases/redisjson: Upstream status change =E2=80=
=94 seeking guidance
=20
Robert,
=20
Following up on my maintainership request. While preparing the update, I =
found that upstream (RedisJSON/RedisJSON) now states "We no longer release = standalone versions of RedisJSON." Starting with Redis 8, RedisJSON is bund= led directly into the Redis server.
=20
The current port is at v2.0.8. The question is: what's the right path for=
ward?
=20
Update to the last standalone release (2.6.x) for users on older Redis ve=
rsions
Mark the port as deprecated since the functionality is now in Redis 8
Some other approach I'm not seeing as a newcomer
I'd rather ask before submitting a patch that takes the wrong direction. =
What does the community prefer here?
=20
Wade Markham wadegimpbc@tuta.com
=20
=20
=20
=20
------=_Part_1436_87662023.1774018549102
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head></head><body>I think somebody else was looking at the same port=
at the same time.<br>
https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=3D77284f93863b4c143470faf6e36be61= 5e3c68723<br>
Regards,<br>
Ronald.<br>
<p><strong>Van:</strong>
wadegimpbc@tuta.com<br>
<strong>Datum:</strong> vrijdag, 20 maart 2026 15:25<br>
<strong>Aan:</strong> Freebsd Ports <
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org><br> <strong>CC:</strong> Robert Clausecker <
fuz@freebsd.org><br> <strong>Onderwerp:</strong> Re: [PATCH] databases/redisjson: Upstream statu=
s change =E2=80=94 seeking guidance</p>
<blockquote style=3D"padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5p=
x; border-left: #000000 2px solid; margin-right: 0px">
<div class=3D"MessageRFC822Viewer" id=3D"P">
<div class=3D"MultipartAlternativeViewer">
<div class=3D"TextHTMLViewer" id=3D"P.P.P">
<p>Robert,</p>
<p>Following up on my maintainership request. While preparing the update, I=
found that upstream (RedisJSON/RedisJSON) now states "We no longer release=
standalone versions of RedisJSON." Starting with Redis 8, RedisJSON is bun= dled directly into the Redis server.</p>
<p>The current port is at v2.0.8. The question is: what's the right path fo= rward?</p>
=09<li>Update to the last standalone release (2.6.x) for users on older Red=
is versions</li>
=09<li>Mark the port as deprecated since the functionality is now in Redis = 8</li>
=09<li>Some other approach I'm not seeing as a newcomer</li>
</ol>
<p>I'd rather ask before submitting a patch that takes the wrong direction.=
What does the community prefer here?</p>
<p>Wade Markham <a href=3D"mailto:
wadegimpbc@tuta.com" target=3D"_blank">wa=
degimpbc@tuta.com</a></p>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
------=_Part_1436_87662023.1774018549102--
--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to
news-admin@muc.de
--- Synchronet 3.21e-Linux NewsLink 1.2