1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. muc.lists.freebsd.ports

  • Re: State of Elasticsearch and related ports

    From Kurt Jaeger@pi@freebsd.org to muc.lists.freebsd.ports on Tue Mar 3 13:52:41 2026
    From Newsgroup: muc.lists.freebsd.ports

    Hi!

    https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290954

    Will this contribution make it into the ports collection? What's missing?

    Time ?

    I was working this PR for elasticsearch8:

    https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=288653

    to get this into the tree. Unfortunately, $dayjob takes its toll 8-(

    The maintainer even provided three minor version updates while
    the port is waiting to be included.

    Same for Kibana:

    https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290979

    And Beats:

    https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=291019

    Thanks, I was not aware of those.
    --
    pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?


    --
    Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
    Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-admin@muc.de
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kurt Jaeger@pi@freebsd.org to muc.lists.freebsd.ports on Sat Mar 7 13:05:45 2026
    From Newsgroup: muc.lists.freebsd.ports

    Hi!

    https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290954

    Will this contribution make it into the ports collection? What's missing?

    Update: there are PRs for update to 8.x (elastic fails to build, beats
    depends on elastic). There are 9.1 and 9.2 PRs for elastic, kibana and beats.

    elastic 9.2 testbuilds look fine.

    As I'm not a user, can someone explain to me if we really need 9.1 and 9.2 versions in parallel in the tree ?
    --
    pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?


    --
    Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
    Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-admin@muc.de
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kurt Jaeger@pi@freebsd.org to muc.lists.freebsd.ports on Mon Mar 9 14:53:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: muc.lists.freebsd.ports

    Hi!

    As I'm not a user, can someone explain to me if we really need 9.1 and 9.2 versions in parallel in the tree?

    I asked our local Elasticsearch guru and he cannot think of a reason to
    use 9.1 instead of 9.2 assuming the latter is available.

    It would be great to have current Elasticsearch ports and packages again.

    saro@ said that there are now 9.3 Elasticsearch releases ?

    How often do you as a 'user org' need 9.2 and 9.3 to test migrations etc ?
    --
    pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?


    --
    Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
    Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-admin@muc.de
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2