From Newsgroup: misc.phone.mobile.iphone


Q: What kind of person participates on a thread, and then flatly denies it?
A: ?

Here's a verbatim response to one of the Apple posters, moments ago.
The fact Apple posters can't absorb any facts tells us something.
Being completely incapable of absorbing facts, is not a good thing.

Not being able to comprehend facts, means not ever being able to learn.

(verbatim)

Chris wrote:

Please stop denying threads exist that you, yourself, participated in.

Link or it didn't happen.

Just stop it.

For God's sake, you even *authored* one of those threads, Chris.

Link or it didn't happen.

Chris,

All intelligent people have excellent memories because you can't absorb
tons of detail about any subject without having an excellent memory.

I said I posted those links already to your own thread that YOU authored.
I also posted it to badgolferman's thread. And also to my own thread.

Those are facts.
Why can I remember those facts, and yet, you can't remember them?

Worse, why do you outright DENY that you *participated* on those threads!
And yet, today, you deny all knowledge of me having posted them.

Who does that?
What kind of person participates on a thread, and then flatly denies it?

What you're proving is it's impossible for you Apple posters to learn. Seriously.

You were told many times, on threads that you participated in.
And now, you deny that fact?

What kind of strange person does that, Chris?
Seriously.

Look it up.

The fact you deny all facts you hate, tells us something about you.
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

Chris wrote:

All intelligent people have excellent memories because you can't absorb
tons of detail about any subject without having an excellent memory.

Nope. Intelligent people know memory is fallible and rely on reliable and demonstrable evidence. There's a whole literature on how eye-witness
accounts are shockingly bad. What's worse is people think their memory is better then it actually is.

As an octogenarian, you'll know this better than most. And as I've highlighted to you before your memory is poor. From one month to the next you've (chosen to?) forgotten key things.

So again. Link or it didn't happen.

Post it here, as your scattergun approach is impossible to follow.

Chris,

Do you seriously think I was making that up?
Seriously?

In your entire life, you've never found that to be the case.
And now, you're saying that?

What kind of person are you?
Are you Alan Baker? Snit? Nospam?

Who denies what clearly happened?

You lose all credibility when you deny what everyone knows happened.

Given that...
Is it even possible to *ever* conduct an adult conversation with you?

Seriously.

Do you realize how frustrating it is to deal with you Apple zealots?
a. You know absolutely nothing about Apple
b. And yet, you deny everything about Apple that is a fact
c. Even to the point of denying your own documented activities

There is zero chance that you have any formal education if you insist that
you can't even run a trivial search to find your own threads on this topic.

You Apple zealots frustrate me because you're incapable of gaining
knowledge. You deny facts that even you know are facts. Why?

What kind of strange person does what you Apple zealots do all the time?
Nobody normal does that.

4/12/23 on a thread authored by Chris <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/OQk2_G0iYoM/m/aITK_9M-AAAJ>
*Apple put cheap batteries and boards into the iPhone 12 for profit* <https://www.theverge.com/2020/8/21/21394985/apple-iphone-12-battery-cost-5g-kuo>
<https://appleinsider.com/articles/20/08/21/apple-to-offset-cost-of-5g-iphone-components-with-cheaper-battery-tech>
<https://www.maticstoday.com/2020/08/21/why-apple-is-using-cheap-battery-parts-in-iphone-12/>
<https://9to5mac.com/2020/08/21/kuo-iphone-12-5g-component-cost/> <https://www.pcmag.com/news/report-iphone-12-to-use-smaller-cheaper-battery> <https://www.macrumors.com/2020/08/20/kuo-iphone-12-battery-board/> <https://www.timesnownews.com/technology-science/article/apple-opting-for-cheaper-battery-parts-to-cut-costs-on-5g-iphone-12-analyst-ming-chi-kuo/640657>
<https://techlog360.com/apple-will-use-cheaper-parts-in-the-iphone-12/> <https://www.phonearena.com/news/apple-to-skimp-on-battery-tech-for-5g-iPhones-says-Kuo_id126708>

Nov 9, 2022 on a thread authored by badgolferman <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/xwGiq6050ls/m/papwYkNGGwAJ>
*Apple put cheap batteries and boards into the iPhone 12 for profit* https://www.theverge.com/2020/8/21/21394985/apple-iphone-12-battery-cost-5g-kuo https://appleinsider.com/articles/20/08/21/apple-to-offset-cost-of-5g-iphone-components-with-cheaper-battery-tech
https://www.maticstoday.com/2020/08/21/why-apple-is-using-cheap-battery-parts-in-iphone-12/
https://9to5mac.com/2020/08/21/kuo-iphone-12-5g-component-cost/ https://www.pcmag.com/news/report-iphone-12-to-use-smaller-cheaper-battery https://www.macrumors.com/2020/08/20/kuo-iphone-12-battery-board/ https://www.timesnownews.com/technology-science/article/apple-opting-for-cheaper-battery-parts-to-cut-costs-on-5g-iphone-12-analyst-ming-chi-kuo/640657
https://techlog360.com/apple-will-use-cheaper-parts-in-the-iphone-12/

Sep 15, 2021 on a thread I authored on the horrid Apple iPhone batteries <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/zmumvfSvCUk/m/OgBZYUORBwAJ>
*Apple put cheap batteries and boards into the iPhone 12 purely for profit* https://www.theverge.com/2020/8/21/21394985/apple-iphone-12-battery-cost-5g-kuo https://appleinsider.com/articles/20/08/21/apple-to-offset-cost-of-5g-iphone-components-with-cheaper-battery-tech
https://www.maticstoday.com/2020/08/21/why-apple-is-using-cheap-battery-parts-in-iphone-12/
https://9to5mac.com/2020/08/21/kuo-iphone-12-5g-component-cost/ https://www.pcmag.com/news/report-iphone-12-to-use-smaller-cheaper-battery https://www.macrumors.com/2020/08/20/kuo-iphone-12-battery-board/ https://www.timesnownews.com/technology-science/article/apple-opting-for-cheaper-battery-parts-to-cut-costs-on-5g-iphone-12-analyst-ming-chi-kuo/640657
https://techlog360.com/apple-will-use-cheaper-parts-in-the-iphone-12/

The way I know none of you Apple zealots could possibly earn a college
diploma is simply the fact that all facts are incomprehensible to you.

You Apple zealots are inert to knowledge.
You're completely incapable of learning anything.

You proved it here.
--
The power of propaganda is such that it turns people's minds into garbage.
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

Tom Elam wrote:

On 4/19/26 1:21 PM, Maria Sophia wrote:

This is old news that Apple historically has put el-cheapo components into >> the iPhone batteries (in addition to laughably puny capacity sizes), so
many of these supporting links are 404 by now, but they've been discussed
in the Apple newsgroups for years, so nobody can deny a statement of fact.

OMG, all those articles are WAY outdated.

Given the point was to prove that Apple did it, that's to be expected.

For those who don't know how Apple religious zealots work, while they
defend Apple to the death, no matter what, they do so using the first
utterly absurd excuse they can come up with, which is what Tom did above.

Their only goal is to deflect, deny, and change the subject somehow,
so that facts about Apple can not be discussed in an adult manner.

In that particular proof that Apple chooses to use crappy components,
the whole point was that on the Apple newsgroup, we've been tracking the
known fact that Apple historically puts crappy batteries in the iPhone.

Some of the Apple religious zealots insisted, always without a shred of evidence, that not only did we NOT talk about it, but that it was false.

So we resurrected the proof that it happened & that we discussed it.
Yet, today, the Apple religious zealots absurdly denied it even happened.

What kind of strange person does that?
I don't know.

It's how Apple religious zealots are.

The absurdity of these ridiculous excuses of the Apple religious zealots
was proven by pointing out exact message Id's of threads in which the Apple religious zealots who denied knowing anything about these facts, actually participated on multiple threads discussing these very facts, and, in some cases, these Apple religious zealots who denied knowing anything about the topic (and hence, they said it was false) actually authored the threads!

What this proves is the Apple zealot likely *hates* all facts about Apple
that don't match with the (admittedly brilliant) propaganda they believed.
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2