From Newsgroup: comp.lang.c++
On 26/03/2026 07:38, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 3/25/2026 8:17 PM, HAL 9000 wrote:
ChatGPT really is quite brilliant at reviewing (and finding bugs) in C++
code.
Its not all that bad. However, let it write a system for breaks in a car right now. Yes. Then test it out, using a real car?
I promise you a human can't do that well enough. It takes a long time to
write the code and even longer to review. Then there's the politics and
the human social behaviours that get in the way.
Traditional static analysis tools with link-knowledge are very
necessary. An LLM that maps queries to static analyses could be very
good for safety, I think. But /which/ LLM with which peculiar nuances
admitted and how do you train inquisitors not to enquire with boundary language?
--
Tristan Wibberley
The message body is Copyright (C) 2026 Tristan Wibberley except
citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,
of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it
verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to
promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation
of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general
superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train
any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that
will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2