From Newsgroup: comp.unix.shell
Thanks for fixing the select issue!
On 2026-02-25 01:39, Martijn Dekker wrote:
Op 11-01-2026 om 04:51 schreef Janis Papanagnou:
[...]
Observed in ksh version AJM 93u+m/1.0.8 2024-01-01.
FYI, you're two point releases behind.
Thanks. - That's probably because since my distro meanwhile supports
"u+m" already I'm just using what's provided.[*]
But maybe I should again get the newest one and ignore what comes out
of the box with my system? (I think if any of the two other issues I
have with "u+m" would get fixed then I'd do that, but I recall you
haven't intended to change these[**], so there's [at the moment] no
pressing need to change to the latest release.)
Janis
[*] If it were still an "u+" I'd certainly get "u+m" from a more up to
date source since I prefer that. I'm glad that "u+m" made it into the
distros.
[**] One was the vi-mode expansion of $(cmd) when typing a '*', which
was already _existing_ in original "u+" (and which, sadly, you removed
from "u+m"); I had used that very often and I'm really missing it. :-/
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2