From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

On Wed, 28 May 2025 13:33:31 +0000, Tyrone wrote :

Bottom line is ALL current iPhones meet the specs.

BTW, all current iPhones (15+) earn a B rating from Apple. Not A.

<https://regulatoryinfo.apple.com/cwt/api/ext/file?fileId=whitePaperEnergyLabels/EU_Energy_Label_for_iPhone_and_iPad_EN_1749628569689.pdf>

It's no longer shocking the Apple trolls *hate* Apple for lying to them.
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

On 2025-06-23 12:18, Marion wrote:

On Wed, 28 May 2025 13:33:31 +0000, Tyrone wrote :

Bottom line is ALL current iPhones meet the specs.

BTW, all current iPhones (15+) earn a B rating from Apple. Not A.

<https://regulatoryinfo.apple.com/cwt/api/ext/file?fileId=whitePaperEnergyLabels/EU_Energy_Label_for_iPhone_and_iPad_EN_1749628569689.pdf>

Actually:

'For example, Energy Efficiency Index scores for iPhone models on
the EU market in June 2025 all qualified for the highest rCLArCY grade'

It's no longer shocking the Apple trolls *hate* Apple for lying to them.

'but Apple chose to voluntarily derate scores to a rCLBrCY grade to minimize the probability that a third-party tester interpreting the regulation differently would achieve a lower grade. We also downgraded scores for
the Repeated Free Fall Reliability Class for the same reason.'

So that's lying by omission, isn't it?

:-)
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

On 23/06/2025 15:26, Alan wrote:

'but Apple chose to voluntarily derate scores to a |Bi grade to minimize
the probability that a third-party tester interpreting the regulation differently would achieve a lower grade. We also downgraded scores for
the Repeated Free Fall Reliability Class for the same reason.'

The lousy b score was calculated in part by dividing battery endurance per cycle duration, in hours, by the battery capacity, in watt-hours.

Apple explained that their marketing tests that nobody else could reproduce showed internally that it was an a but nobody could reproduce that a so
it's a b due to apple internal measurements that they widely market as
truth were not even close to being objectively independently reproducible.

But it's not only the iphone battery that has a lousy rating.
Apple iPhones have a c reliability rating.
Again, despite what marketing would have you believe.

And a c repairability rating.
Again, they explained they were advertising higher than reality showed but since nobody could reproduce the internal iphone tests objectively outside
of apple, they had to claim the rating that others would have found for it.

battery = b
reliability = c
repairability = c

Compare those iphone ratings to samsung phones in the same price range.
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

On Jun 23, 2025 at 3:34:34rC>PM EDT, "Ulysses Nostos" <ulysses@nostos.org> wrote:

On 23/06/2025 15:26, Alan wrote:

'but Apple chose to voluntarily derate scores to a rCLBrCY grade to minimize >> the probability that a third-party tester interpreting the regulation
differently would achieve a lower grade. We also downgraded scores for
the Repeated Free Fall Reliability Class for the same reason.'

The lousy b score was calculated in part by dividing battery endurance per cycle duration, in hours, by the battery capacity, in watt-hours.

Apple explained that their marketing tests that nobody else could reproduce showed internally that it was an a but nobody could reproduce that a so
it's a b due to apple internal measurements that they widely market as
truth were not even close to being objectively independently reproducible.

But it's not only the iphone battery that has a lousy rating.
Apple iPhones have a c reliability rating.
Again, despite what marketing would have you believe.

And a c repairability rating.
Again, they explained they were advertising higher than reality showed but since nobody could reproduce the internal iphone tests objectively outside
of apple, they had to claim the rating that others would have found for it.

battery = b
reliability = c
repairability = c

Compare those iphone ratings to samsung phones in the same price range.

And Arlens another alias to his stable.
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2