Chris wrote:
Lol. That implies that you're normally not. Yet again, the mask slips.
<snip>
I made no judgement about the accuracy of your point. It is still an insult >> to pass judgement or highlight a factually correct observation about
someone's character. For example, "You're ugly", "you smell awful", or
"you're stupid" are all insults even if they may be accurate to some
degree. Someone as thin-skinned as you should recognise that.
Your continued argument and lack of contrition is indicative of your
hypocrisy.
Hi Chris,
I'll ignore your insults (which I cut out of the quoted text above for that reason)
You want to call people out for insulting behaviour and yet deny
you calling people stupid is an insult.
Chris wrote:
You want to call people out for insulting behaviour and yet deny
you calling people stupid is an insult.
Chris,
Give me credit for being intelligent.
Don't you think there's a reason both those threads were entered consecutively? C'mon. Think about it. Do you think it's by accident?
Not a single person who replied has understood something as simple as the
two conditions in the original post of the thread that they claim this belongs in, which is my entire point about the D-K effect.
You all proved it for me.
Thanks!
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 09:21:53 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
2 files (6,679K bytes) |
| Messages: | 265,083 |