• Re: A weekend with Linux. Thanks but no thanks.

    From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Mon Sep 21 01:02:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:37:17 -0000 (UTC), Linonut wrote:

    Right off the bat I found the Ubuntu gui to be somewhat odd and not
    at all intuitive to me a MacOS user.

    You do realize you donrCOt just have one choice of GUIs, right?

    Linux is a Unix-type system. Maybe yourCOre not used to the concept of Unix-type systems, where the GUI is modular and replaceable.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nick Charles@none@none.none to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Mon Sep 21 01:35:28 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Sep 20, 2026 at 9:02:14rC>PM EDT, "Lawrence D-|Oliveiro" <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:37:17 -0000 (UTC), Linonut wrote:

    Right off the bat I found the Ubuntu gui to be somewhat odd and not
    at all intuitive to me a MacOS user.

    You do realize you donrCOt just have one choice of GUIs, right?

    YOU do realize that changing the GUI on Linux is beyond the capabilities of USERS, right?

    Linux is a Unix-type system. Maybe yourCOre not used to the concept of Unix-type systems, where the GUI is modular and replaceable.

    MacOS is a Unix-type system. Maybe you are still in denial of the concept
    that ALL Apple hardware runs the same Apple Unix OS with different GUIs. Because the GUI is modular and replaceable, just like all Unix-type systems.

    Thus Macs, iPhones, iPads and Apple watches all run Apple Unix with very different GUIs.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Leroy H@lh@somewhere.net to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Mon Sep 21 01:47:56 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 01:02:14 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:


    You do realize you donrCOt just have one choice of GUIs, right?


    Sure.

    Try choosing fvwm3 or any of the many, many other stacking/tiling
    window managers on a "modern" wayland system. You will be SOL
    (shit outa luck).

    Your definition of "choice" is obviously "whatever IBM/RedHat says."

    Effing idiot.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rbowman@bowman@montana.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Mon Sep 21 02:41:22 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 01:47:56 +0000, Leroy H wrote:

    Try choosing fvwm3 or any of the many, many other stacking/tiling window managers on a "modern" wayland system. You will be SOL (shit outa
    luck).

    I use sway on Wayland and i3 on X11. There are a few things i3 does that
    do not work in Wayland but nothing I miss.

    It has more glitz than I need but Hyprland seems to work well with
    Wayland. I have Omarchy up in a VM. Interesting but not my thing. Too much crap like HEY and WhatsApp that I have no use for and I prefer Vim to
    Neovim. Like the DE ricers Neovim exists so people can spend their time writing Lua scripts to make it work.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Leroy H@lh@somewhere.net to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Mon Sep 21 02:59:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 21 Sep 2026 02:41:22 GMT, rbowman wrote:


    [snip]


    The most important term in desktop computing is "minimalism."

    It is a term that most users cannot understand but its significance
    is profound.

    My mantra:

    Be minimal or be nothing.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Mon Sep 21 03:13:20 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 01:35:28 +0000, Nick Charles wrote:

    On Sep 20, 2026 at 9:02:14rC>PM EDT, "Lawrence D-|Oliveiro" <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:37:17 -0000 (UTC), Linonut wrote:

    Right off the bat I found the Ubuntu gui to be somewhat odd and
    not at all intuitive to me a MacOS user.

    You do realize you donrCOt just have one choice of GUIs, right?

    YOU do realize that changing the GUI on Linux is beyond the
    capabilities of USERS, right?

    Why, do you think it takes some kind of special voodoo black magic
    beyond installing any other package?

    Linux is a Unix-type system. Maybe yourCOre not used to the concept
    of Unix-type systems, where the GUI is modular and replaceable.

    MacOS is a Unix-type system.

    It is a licensee of the trademark, nothing more. And worse than that,
    the version of the rCLUNIXrCY spec it conforms to is not the latest one,
    but was last updated over 20 years ago.

    And you certainly canrCOt install a different GUI on it.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Mon Sep 21 08:30:23 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2026-09-20 9:02 p.m., Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:
    On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:37:17 -0000 (UTC), Linonut wrote:

    Right off the bat I found the Ubuntu gui to be somewhat odd and not
    at all intuitive to me a MacOS user.

    You do realize you donrCOt just have one choice of GUIs, right?

    Linux is a Unix-type system. Maybe yourCOre not used to the concept of Unix-type systems, where the GUI is modular and replaceable.

    To be honest, I don't see much difference between the default Ubuntu experience and the MacOS one other than the fact that Apple's version is polished.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    John 14:6
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nick Charles@none@none.none to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Sep 22 01:20:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Sep 20, 2026 at 11:13:20rC>PM EDT, "Lawrence D-|Oliveiro" <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 01:35:28 +0000, Nick Charles wrote:

    On Sep 20, 2026 at 9:02:14rC>PM EDT, "Lawrence D-|Oliveiro" <ldo@nz.invalid> >> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:37:17 -0000 (UTC), Linonut wrote:

    Right off the bat I found the Ubuntu gui to be somewhat odd and
    not at all intuitive to me a MacOS user.

    You do realize you donrCOt just have one choice of GUIs, right?

    YOU do realize that changing the GUI on Linux is beyond the
    capabilities of USERS, right?

    Why, do you think it takes some kind of special voodoo black magic
    beyond installing any other package?

    For a USER, yes.

    Linux is a Unix-type system. Maybe yourCOre not used to the concept
    of Unix-type systems, where the GUI is modular and replaceable.

    MacOS is a Unix-type system.

    It is a licensee of the trademark, nothing more. And worse than that,
    the version of the rCLUNIXrCY spec it conforms to is not the latest one,
    but was last updated over 20 years ago.

    And exactly how recent Unix spec does Linux conform to? And which version of Linux is that?

    And you certainly canrCOt install a different GUI on it.

    Why would you want to? And you certainly could if the full source code was available. But of course that is not available. Nor should it be.

    AGAIN, Apple Unix already has several GUIs. Interesting how you snipped that.
    MacOS, iOS, iPadOS and WatchOS are all Apple Unix, but with different GUIs specifically designed for the hardware in question.

    AGAIN, Apple Unix is Unix. That you can't stand that is YOUR problem. Not Apple's.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2