I do.No... ...you don't.I actually make sense. You run away.Yet here you are humping my leg.Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.Oh you hate when I do it to you?
Just like me.FIFY
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
I'm right here you idiot. I already answered you.
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 14:26, Skeeter wrote:
Just like yours means nothing!Or admit you're too scared to advance anything for fear I can >>>>>>> show the
US is worse.
Your opinion means nothing.
And that's all you have: your opinion.
Yet here you are humping my leg.
Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
I actually make sense. You run away.
No... ...you don't.
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.
Just like now.
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
On 2026-07-23 14:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ts4e$4ssk$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 09:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113tgos$k64$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 07:22, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113s6on$3hcu6$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>Just like yours means nothing!
On 2026-07-22 20:07, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113rvl8$3fr8e$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-22 19:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113rtqb$3f577$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-22 19:05, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113rsld$3f577$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-22 18:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ro2o$3dsmm$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-22 17:12, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113rkue$3cil8$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-22 15:00, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113rdp0$3ap1u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
You hate it huh. Is this where you lol and raise the flag? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-22 14:12, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Give me a single example of how Canada is supposedly a
You asked and I answered.Dodging yet again.You live there for one."shithole" compared to the US. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do I have to compare it? It just is. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In what way?
In what specific way?
I'm just playing the Alan usenet game. Only thing is I don't run away.
No. You gave an obvious and tedious dodge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nope.
This is where I ask you to provide some example of what you're claiming.
And I told you that I don't listen to your demands. You always spin and run so
I don't take you serious. I toss out a hook and you take it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Seems like you're the one on the hook to me.
You made a claim.
You can't back it up.
Spit it out and try again.
Just back up your claim...
...if you can.
I won't explain again why I don't take you serious. You lost many threads ago.
You don't need to explain what is clearly a lie.
You "take [me] seriously"...
...right up until you're losing.
I don't take anything from you serious. I don't lose. I watch you shoot
yourself in the foot.
Really?
How is that?
:-)
Just reread your own posts. You are all question by never have any answers.
Yet you cannot give an example of that either.
I don't have to.
But let's stick to the issue at hand.
Coming from YOU that is ironic.
You claim Canada is a "shithole" country, and your only comeback is that
I live in it.
Works for me.
Give us something real, Cupcake.
That is real. YOU do live there.
Or admit you're too scared to advance anything for fear I can show the >>>>>> US is worse.
Your opinion means nothing.
And that's all you have: your opinion.
Yet here you are humping my leg.
Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
I actually make sense. You run away.
No... ...you don't.
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.
Just like now.
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such rankings)...
...you ran.
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 14:26, Skeeter wrote:
Just like yours means nothing!Or admit you're too scared to advance anything for fear I can >>>>>>> show the
US is worse.
Your opinion means nothing.
And that's all you have: your opinion.
Yet here you are humping my leg.
Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
I actually make sense. You run away.
No... ...you don't.
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.
Just like now.
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
On 2026-07-23 15:24, Skeeter wrote:
I do.No... ...you don't.I actually make sense. You run away.Yet here you are humping my leg.Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.Oh you hate when I do it to you?
Nope. I'm (somewhat) amused by it.
Just like me.FIFY
Nope. You just changed my text to (try to) make yourself look better.
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
I'm right here you idiot. I already answered you.
No...you dodged.
:-)--
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that. I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
In article <113u7li$8n95$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that. I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Why are you afraid of Skeeter? Give him hell.
On 7/23/2026 7:29 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u7li$8n95$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>> On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such >>>>> rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that. I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Why are you afraid of Skeeter? Give him hell.
I'm less than afraid of him, heh. I just want to support Alan on how blatantly lame Skeeter is, on this stuff.
On 7/23/2026 7:29 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u7li$8n95$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>> On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such >>>>> rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that. I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Why are you afraid of Skeeter? Give him hell.
I'm less than afraid of him, heh. I just want to support Alan on how blatantly lame Skeeter is, on this stuff.
I just want to support Alan on how
blatantly lame Skeeter is, on this stuff.
Well Alan will never be your friend. He's a turncoat. Good luck.
In article <113u5ke$83f9$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 15:24, Skeeter wrote:
I do.No... ...you don't.I actually make sense. You run away.Yet here you are humping my leg.Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.Oh you hate when I do it to you?
Nope. I'm (somewhat) amused by it.
Just like me.FIFY
Nope. You just changed my text to (try to) make yourself look better.
I am better.
You DID dodge!
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
I'm right here you idiot. I already answered you.
No...you dodged.
I did and you ran away.
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.-a I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.-a I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate you.
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>> On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such >>>>>> rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.-a I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate
you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact.-a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're
intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>>> On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such >>>>>>> rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.-a I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could
hate you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact.-a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're
intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
On 2026-07-23 16:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113u5ke$83f9$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 15:24, Skeeter wrote:
I do.No... ...you don't.I actually make sense. You run away.Yet here you are humping my leg.Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.Oh you hate when I do it to you?
Nope. I'm (somewhat) amused by it.
Just like me.FIFY
Nope. You just changed my text to (try to) make yourself look better.
I am better.
Isn't that just bragging?
It's Thursday. You're do to run away soon.
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
I'm right here you idiot. I already answered you.
No...you dodged.
I did and you ran away.You DID dodge!
Thanks for admitting it (finally).I answered you. Your game is no good here.
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.a I'm concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate you.
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>> On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such >>>>> rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.a I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact. You aren't a bad guy at all, you're
intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>> On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such >>>>>> rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.a I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate
you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact.a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
On 7/23/2026 9:10 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>>> On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such >>>>>>> rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.a I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could
hate you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact.a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're
intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
So what? We aren't talking about that. We're talking about mutual
respect. I respect you. I even accept your weirdo affection for
Apple's crapware. Why do you have to make a point of being indifferent
to me? Does that make you above me somehow? Free hint, it definitely doesn't, that's all in your head. Don't be a small mind.
In article <113ubcn$83e5$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 16:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113u5ke$83f9$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 15:24, Skeeter wrote:
I do.No... ...you don't.I actually make sense. You run away.Yet here you are humping my leg.Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.Oh you hate when I do it to you?
Nope. I'm (somewhat) amused by it.
Just like me.FIFY
Nope. You just changed my text to (try to) make yourself look better.
I am better.
Isn't that just bragging?
Fact
"due".It's Thursday. You're do to run away soon.
You DID dodge!
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such >>>>>> rankings)...
...you ran.
I'm right here you idiot. I already answered you.
No...you dodged.
I did and you ran away.
Thanks for admitting it (finally).I answered you. Your game is no good here.
In article <113ue2e$alss$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>>>> On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such >>>>>>>> rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.-a I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate >>>> you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact.-a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're
intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
Says the guy who stomps his feet when we make him look silly.
Nope.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
Because you hate him.
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
On 2026-07-23 18:24, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ubcn$83e5$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 16:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113u5ke$83f9$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
I am better.
On 2026-07-23 15:24, Skeeter wrote:
I do.No... ...you don't.I actually make sense. You run away.Yet here you are humping my leg.Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.Oh you hate when I do it to you?
Nope. I'm (somewhat) amused by it.
Just like me.FIFY
Nope. You just changed my text to (try to) make yourself look better. >>>
Isn't that just bragging?
Fact
I see. So any statement one makes is "fact" and any "fact" isn't bragging.
Got it.
"due".It's Thursday. You're do to run away soon.
You DID dodge!
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such >>>>>> rankings)...
...you ran.
I'm right here you idiot. I already answered you.
No...you dodged.
I did and you ran away.
Thanks for admitting it (finally).I answered you. Your game is no good here.
And what you did isn't a typo.
:-)--
On 2026-07-23 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ue2e$alss$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>>>> On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such >>>>>>>> rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.a I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate >>>> you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle >>> we might have to interact.a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're
intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
Says the guy who stomps his feet when we make him look silly.
Really?
Give an example.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
Because you hate him.Nope.
Same as you, Cupcake.
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
On 7/23/2026 10:48 PM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way? Why is meeting people online so
different from real life? Try lightening up.
In article <113ujnl$c78l$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 18:24, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ubcn$83e5$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 16:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113u5ke$83f9$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
I am better.
On 2026-07-23 15:24, Skeeter wrote:
I do.No... ...you don't.I actually make sense. You run away.Yet here you are humping my leg.Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.Oh you hate when I do it to you?
Nope. I'm (somewhat) amused by it.
Just like me.FIFY
Nope. You just changed my text to (try to) make yourself look better. >>>>>
Isn't that just bragging?
Fact
I see. So any statement one makes is "fact" and any "fact" isn't bragging.
Well I know I am fact.
Am I, really?
Got it.
"due".It's Thursday. You're do to run away soon.
You DID dodge!
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such >>>>>>>> rankings)...
...you ran.
I'm right here you idiot. I already answered you.
No...you dodged.
I did and you ran away.
Thanks for admitting it (finally).I answered you. Your game is no good here.
And what you did isn't a typo.
You still getting ready to do it.
On 7/23/2026 10:48 PM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't
give two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way?-a Why is meeting people online so
different from real life?-a Try lightening up.
In article <113uk30$c9ld$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 10:48 PM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give >>> two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way? Why is meeting people online so
different from real life? Try lightening up.
Because I would have slapped you silly in real life.
In article <113ujpg$c78l$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...Nope!
On 2026-07-23 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ue2e$alss$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>>>>>> On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such >>>>>>>>>> rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.-a I'm >>>>>>> concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate >>>>>> you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle >>>>> we might have to interact.-a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're
intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
Says the guy who stomps his feet when we make him look silly.
Really?
Give an example.
Nope.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
Because you hate him.
Same as you, Cupcake.
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yes you do.
On 7/23/2026 9:10 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com
says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such >>>>>>>> rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.-a I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could
hate you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only
angle we might have to interact.-a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're
intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
So what?-a We aren't talking about that.-a We're talking about mutual respect.-a I respect you.-a I even accept your weirdo affection for
Apple's crapware.-a Why do you have to make a point of being indifferent
to me?-a Does that make you above me somehow?-a Free hint, it definitely doesn't, that's all in your head.-a Don't be a small mind.
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't
give two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way?-a Why is meeting people online so
different from real life?-a Try lightening up.
I'm completely light.
That's the point.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.-a I'm >>>>>> concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could
hate you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only
angle we might have to interact.-a You aren't a bad guy at all,
you're intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing
views of computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
So what?-a We aren't talking about that.-a We're talking about mutual
respect.-a I respect you.-a I even accept your weirdo affection for
Apple's crapware.-a Why do you have to make a point of being
indifferent to me?-a Does that make you above me somehow?-a Free hint,
it definitely doesn't, that's all in your head.-a Don't be a small mind.
I have no "respect" for you...
...just as I don't hate, or even dislike you.
You don't matter to me.
On 2026-07-23 20:20, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujnl$c78l$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 18:24, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ubcn$83e5$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 16:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113u5ke$83f9$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 15:24, Skeeter wrote:I am better.
I do.No... ...you don't.I actually make sense. You run away.Yet here you are humping my leg.Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.Oh you hate when I do it to you?
Nope. I'm (somewhat) amused by it.
Just like me.FIFY
Nope. You just changed my text to (try to) make yourself look better. >>>>>
Isn't that just bragging?
Fact
I see. So any statement one makes is "fact" and any "fact" isn't bragging.
Well I know I am fact.
That you exist...I've never denied it. SOMEONE writes your posts.
The "fact" that you are "better"?
Please. Spare me.
Got it.
"due".It's Thursday. You're do to run away soon.
You DID dodge!
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such >>>>>>>> rankings)...
...you ran.
I'm right here you idiot. I already answered you.
No...you dodged.
I did and you ran away.
Thanks for admitting it (finally).I answered you. Your game is no good here.
And what you did isn't a typo.
You still getting ready to do it.Am I, really?
On 2026-07-23 19:53, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 10:48 PM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't
give two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way?a Why is meeting people online so
different from real life?a Try lightening up.
I'm completely light.
That's the point.
On 7/24/2026 12:33 AM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't
give two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way?a Why is meeting people online so
different from real life?a Try lightening up.
I'm completely light.
That's the point.
You come across antisocial.
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113uk30$c9ld$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 10:48 PM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give >>> two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way? Why is meeting people online so
different from real life? Try lightening up.
Because I would have slapped you silly in real life.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Whatever you need to believe, Cupcake!
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujpg$c78l$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ue2e$alss$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.a I'm >>>>>>> concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate >>>>>> you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle >>>>> we might have to interact.a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're
intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
Says the guy who stomps his feet when we make him look silly.
Really?
Give an example.
Nope.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
Because you hate him.
Same as you, Cupcake.
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give >> two straws about you.
:-)
Yes you do.Nope!
On 2026-07-23 18:14, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 9:10 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com
says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such >>>>>>>> rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.a I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could
hate you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only
angle we might have to interact.a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're >>> intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
So what?a We aren't talking about that.a We're talking about mutual respect.a I respect you.a I even accept your weirdo affection for
Apple's crapware.a Why do you have to make a point of being indifferent
to me?a Does that make you above me somehow?a Free hint, it definitely doesn't, that's all in your head.a Don't be a small mind.
I have no "respect" for you...
...just as I don't hate, or even dislike you.
You don't matter to me.
On 7/24/2026 12:35 AM, Alan wrote:
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.a I'm >>>>>> concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could >>>>> hate you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only
angle we might have to interact.a You aren't a bad guy at all,
you're intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing
views of computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
So what?a We aren't talking about that.a We're talking about mutual
respect.a I respect you.a I even accept your weirdo affection for
Apple's crapware.a Why do you have to make a point of being
indifferent to me?a Does that make you above me somehow?a Free hint,
it definitely doesn't, that's all in your head.a Don't be a small mind.
I have no "respect" for you...
...just as I don't hate, or even dislike you.
You don't matter to me.
Then you have no soul.
On 7/24/2026 12:33 AM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't
give two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way?a Why is meeting people online so
different from real life?a Try lightening up.
I'm completely light.
That's the point.
You come across antisocial.
In article <113uqbk$dvc1$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/24/2026 12:33 AM, Alan wrote:
Why is meeting people online so
different from real life?-a Try lightening up.
I'm completely light.
That's the point.
You come across antisocial.
Alan is a trouble maker. You are best to ignore him.
On 7/24/2026 9:55 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113uqbk$dvc1$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/24/2026 12:33 AM, Alan wrote:
Why is meeting people online so
different from real life?a Try lightening up.
I'm completely light.
That's the point.
You come across antisocial.
Alan is a trouble maker. You are best to ignore him.
No. Alan has posted some valuable stuff. I consider him an ally.
On 7/24/2026 9:55 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113uqbk$dvc1$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/24/2026 12:33 AM, Alan wrote:
Why is meeting people online so
different from real life?a Try lightening up.
I'm completely light.
That's the point.
You come across antisocial.
Alan is a trouble maker. You are best to ignore him.
No. Alan has posted some valuable stuff. I consider him an ally.
Alan is a trouble maker. You are best to ignore him.
No. Alan has posted some valuable stuff. I consider him an ally.
He will turn on you as soon as he has a bad day.
On 7/24/2026 11:29 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Alan is a trouble maker. You are best to ignore him.
No. Alan has posted some valuable stuff. I consider him an ally.
He will turn on you as soon as he has a bad day.
Should I believe you, instead?
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provideNot true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
Oh CRAP!
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07rC>AM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link)
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
your age.
Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43rC>PM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03rC>PM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy...
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well.
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote:I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy.
On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impersonate you.
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hugh- huntzinger- the-
plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rec.scuba
thread/post:
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again", within
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the archives of
published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Ling's original
NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions on webpages
without acknowledgement, and used the posting name >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Hugh (NED)
Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually had the
NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This was the ORIGINAL version:
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b
400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dredging up a necro
thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around pulling the same crap but the audience has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You disparaging someone...that's irony.
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence.
You lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy.
Details please
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my business >>>>>>>>>>> as "[my] company website".
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website >>>>>>>>>>> of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company.
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig
employment from others for your services under your
bakermendia moniker which you claim to own.
You knew what a "company website" was...
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a person... >>>>>>>>>
..because you had both yourself.
And here is another lie: Look up this:
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial
version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better >>>>>>>> impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion...
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020...
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018.
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"?
I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years?
What a surprise. But it's the simple truth.
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what...
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger...
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the
photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on LinkedIn.
You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the current version. >>>
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
Nope. Utterly false.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link.
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the same
person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their
dates displayed if you like.
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the same
person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken
October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
In article <113or7k$2cf7j$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-21 15:15, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113oq7e$2cf7j$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-21 14:18, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113olf4$2amc8$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the >>>>>>> photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major >>>>>>> illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the same >>>>>>> person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>>>>>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken >>>>>> October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/view?usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018: >>>>>>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/view?usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Yet you continue to do it. Is it an obsession?
Really?
What lies have I ever told?
Not enough bandwidth to list them all.
I didn't ask you for an exhaustive list...
...so how about you just start with ONE.
You never convinced me you were a race car driver.
On 7/24/2026 11:29 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Alan is a trouble maker. You are best to ignore him.
No. Alan has posted some valuable stuff. I consider him an ally.
He will turn on you as soon as he has a bad day.
Should I believe you, instead?
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provideNot true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy. >>>>
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
Oh CRAP!
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07rC>AM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link)
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
your age.
Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43rC>PM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03rC>PM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy...
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well.
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it.
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote:I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy.
On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impersonate you.
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hugh- huntzinger- the-
plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rec.scuba
thread/post:
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again", within
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the archives of
published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Ling's original
NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions on webpages
without acknowledgement, and used the posting name >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Hugh (NED)
Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually had the
NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This was the ORIGINAL version:
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b
400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dredging up a necro
thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around pulling the same crap but the audience has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You disparaging someone...that's irony.
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence.
You lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy.
Details please
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my
business as "[my] company website".
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website >>>>>>>>>>>> of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company.
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig
employment from others for your services under your
bakermendia moniker which you claim to own.
You knew what a "company website" was...
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a
person...
..because you had both yourself.
And here is another lie: Look up this:
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial >>>>>>>>> version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better >>>>>>>>> impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion...
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020... >>>>>>>>
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018.
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"?
I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years?
What a surprise. But it's the simple truth.
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what...
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger...
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the
photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on
LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the
current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
Nope. Utterly false.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link.
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their
dates displayed if you like.
In article <113upu1$dsbp$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 20:20, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujnl$c78l$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
Well I know I am fact.
On 2026-07-23 18:24, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ubcn$83e5$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 16:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113u5ke$83f9$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 15:24, Skeeter wrote:I am better.
I do.No... ...you don't.I actually make sense. You run away.Yet here you are humping my leg.Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.Oh you hate when I do it to you?
Nope. I'm (somewhat) amused by it.
Just like me.FIFY
Nope. You just changed my text to (try to) make yourself look better. >>>>>>>
Isn't that just bragging?
Fact
I see. So any statement one makes is "fact" and any "fact" isn't bragging. >>>
That you exist...I've never denied it. SOMEONE writes your posts.
The "fact" that you are "better"?
Please. Spare me.
Way better. Are you bragging?
And you're wrong again.
Am I, really?
Got it.
"due".It's Thursday. You're do to run away soon.
You DID dodge!
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such >>>>>>>>>> rankings)...
...you ran.
I'm right here you idiot. I already answered you.
No...you dodged.
I did and you ran away.
Thanks for admitting it (finally).I answered you. Your game is no good here.
And what you did isn't a typo.
You still getting ready to do it.
I can promise it.
In article <113upve$dsbp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113uk30$c9ld$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 10:48 PM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give >>>>> two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way? Why is meeting people online so
different from real life? Try lightening up.
Because I would have slapped you silly in real life.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Whatever you need to believe, Cupcake!
We all know it's true. Your nervous laughter shows it.
In article <113upvp$dsbp$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujpg$c78l$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...Nope!
On 2026-07-23 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ue2e$alss$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate >>>>>>>> you.
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>>>>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.-a I'm >>>>>>>>> concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is. >>>>>>>>
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle >>>>>>> we might have to interact.-a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're >>>>>>> intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of >>>>>>> computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
Says the guy who stomps his feet when we make him look silly.
Really?
Give an example.
Nope.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
Because you hate him.
Same as you, Cupcake.
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give >>>> two straws about you.
:-)
Yes you do.
Oh you do. Your posting shows it.
On 7/21/26 7:10 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113or7k$2cf7j$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-21 15:15, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113oq7e$2cf7j$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-21 14:18, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113olf4$2amc8$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about >>>>>>>> the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a >>>>>>>> major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are >>>>>>>> the same
person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>>>>>>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken >>>>>>> October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-
IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/view?usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018: >>>>>>>
<https://drive.google.com/file/
d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/view?usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Yet you continue to do it. Is it an obsession?
Really?
What lies have I ever told?
Not enough bandwidth to list them all.
I didn't ask you for an exhaustive list...
...so how about you just start with ONE.
You never convinced me you were a race car driver.
That is not a lie. The self-reported quality of that driving is a lie.
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken
October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/
view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/
view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 14:26, Skeeter wrote:
Just like yours means nothing!Or admit you're too scared to advance anything for fear I can >>>>>>>> show the
US is worse.
Your opinion means nothing.
And that's all you have: your opinion.
Yet here you are humping my leg.
Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
I actually make sense. You run away.
No... ...you don't.
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.
Just like now.
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:<snip>
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact.a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're
intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
On 7/24/2026 12:35 AM, Alan wrote:
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.a I'm >>>>>>> concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could >>>>>> hate you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only
angle we might have to interact.a You aren't a bad guy at all,
you're intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing
views of computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
So what?a We aren't talking about that.a We're talking about mutual
respect.a I respect you.a I even accept your weirdo affection for
Apple's crapware.a Why do you have to make a point of being
indifferent to me?a Does that make you above me somehow?a Free hint,
it definitely doesn't, that's all in your head.a Don't be a small mind.
I have no "respect" for you...
...just as I don't hate, or even dislike you.
You don't matter to me.
Then you have no soul.
On Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:10:38 -0700, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact.-a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're
intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
Which gives the lie to Skeeter. You don't hate Joel, you just don't
care.
On 7/24/2026 12:33 AM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't
give two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way?a Why is meeting people online so
different from real life?a Try lightening up.
I'm completely light.
That's the point.
You come across antisocial.
On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:40:20 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/24/2026 12:33 AM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't
give two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way?-a Why is meeting people online so
different from real life?-a Try lightening up.
I'm completely light.
That's the point.
You come across antisocial.
I don't see it.
He's being honest that you don't matter to him. This is not the same
as active dislike or contempt. It's simple apathy. He has honestly
and politely told you he just ... doesn't care, one way or the other.
On 7/24/2026 6:21 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:40:20 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/24/2026 12:33 AM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't >>>>>> give two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way?-a Why is meeting people online so
different from real life?-a Try lightening up.
I'm completely light.
That's the point.
You come across antisocial.
I don't see it.
He's being honest that you don't matter to him.-a This is not the same
as active dislike or contempt.-a It's simple apathy.-a He has honestly
and politely told you he just ... doesn't care, one way or the other.
I get that.-a It's just lame.-a It's not exploring what can be found.
On 2026-07-24 15:31, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/24/2026 6:21 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:40:20 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/24/2026 12:33 AM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't >>>>>>> give two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way?-a Why is meeting people online so
different from real life?-a Try lightening up.
I'm completely light.
That's the point.
You come across antisocial.
I don't see it.
He's being honest that you don't matter to him.-a This is not the same
as active dislike or contempt.-a It's simple apathy.-a He has honestly
and politely told you he just ... doesn't care, one way or the other.
I get that.-a It's just lame.-a It's not exploring what can be found.
You had your chance to show what you had to offer...
...and I found it...
...lame.
On 2026-07-24 06:14, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upu1$dsbp$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 20:20, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujnl$c78l$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 18:24, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ubcn$83e5$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 16:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113u5ke$83f9$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 15:24, Skeeter wrote:
I do.No... ...you don't.I actually make sense. You run away.Yet here you are humping my leg.Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.Oh you hate when I do it to you?
Nope. I'm (somewhat) amused by it.
Just like me.FIFY
Nope. You just changed my text to (try to) make yourself look better.
I am better.
Isn't that just bragging?
Fact
I see. So any statement one makes is "fact" and any "fact" isn't bragging.
Well I know I am fact.
That you exist...I've never denied it. SOMEONE writes your posts.
The "fact" that you are "better"?
Please. Spare me.
Way better. Are you bragging?
So you ARE bragging.
Am I, really?
Got it.
"due".It's Thursday. You're do to run away soon.
You DID dodge!
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
I'm right here you idiot. I already answered you.
No...you dodged.
I did and you ran away.
Thanks for admitting it (finally).I answered you. Your game is no good here.
And what you did isn't a typo.
You still getting ready to do it.
I can promise it.And you're wrong again.
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide >>>>> one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back >>>> to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy. >>>>
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the >>>> photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
Oh CRAP!
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link)
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine, >>> that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you >>> actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
your age.
Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy...
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well.
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it.
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:Nope. Utterly false.
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:What a surprise. But it's the simple truth.
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote:I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy.
On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impersonate you.
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hugh- huntzinger- the-
plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rec.scuba
thread/post:
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again", within
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the archives of
published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Ling's original
NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions on webpages
without acknowledgement, and used the posting name >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Hugh (NED)
Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually had the
NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This was the ORIGINAL version:
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b
400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dredging up a necro
thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around pulling the same crap but the audience has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You disparaging someone...that's irony.
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence.
You lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy.
Details please
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my >>>>>>>>>>>> business as "[my] company website".
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website >>>>>>>>>>>> of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company.
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig
employment from others for your services under your
bakermendia moniker which you claim to own.
You knew what a "company website" was...
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a >>>>>>>>>> person...
..because you had both yourself.
And here is another lie: Look up this:
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial >>>>>>>>> version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better >>>>>>>>> impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion... >>>>>>>>
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020... >>>>>>>>
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018.
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"?
I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years? >>>>>>
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what...
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger... >>>>>>
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the >>>>> photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on
LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the
current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy. >>
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link.
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major >>> illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their
dates displayed if you like.
Of course.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
On 2026-07-24 06:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upve$dsbp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113uk30$c9ld$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>
On 7/23/2026 10:48 PM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way? Why is meeting people online so
different from real life? Try lightening up.
Because I would have slapped you silly in real life.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Whatever you need to believe, Cupcake!
We all know it's true. Your nervous laughter shows it.
How does one get "nervous" from text, Cupcake?
On 2026-07-24 06:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upvp$dsbp$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujpg$c78l$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...Nope!
On 2026-07-23 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ue2e$alss$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.a I'm >>>>>>>>> concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is. >>>>>>>>
you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact.a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're >>>>>>> intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of >>>>>>> computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
Says the guy who stomps his feet when we make him look silly.
Really?
Give an example.
Nope.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
Because you hate him.
Same as you, Cupcake.
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give >>>> two straws about you.
:-)
Yes you do.
Oh you do. Your posting shows it.
How is my posting different than yours, Cupcake?
On 2026-07-24 12:15, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 7:10 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113or7k$2cf7j$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-21 15:15, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113oq7e$2cf7j$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>
On 2026-07-21 14:18, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113olf4$2amc8$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about >>>>>>>> the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a >>>>>>>> major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are >>>>>>>> the same
person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>>>>>>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken >>>>>>> October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-
IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/view?usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018: >>>>>>>
<https://drive.google.com/file/
d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/view?usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Yet you continue to do it. Is it an obsession?
Really?
What lies have I ever told?
Not enough bandwidth to list them all.
I didn't ask you for an exhaustive list...
...so how about you just start with ONE.
You never convinced me you were a race car driver.
That is not a lie. The self-reported quality of that driving is a lie.
Good enough for the second fastest lap ever around Mission Raceway
(prior to it's latest renovation)
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major >>> illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken
October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/
view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/
view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
On Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:30:57 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 14:26, Skeeter wrote:
Just like yours means nothing!Or admit you're too scared to advance anything for fear I can >>>>>>>> show the
US is worse.
Your opinion means nothing.
And that's all you have: your opinion.
Yet here you are humping my leg.
Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
I actually make sense. You run away.
No... ...you don't.
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.
Just like now.
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
And keeps coming back for more.
On Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:10:38 -0700, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:<snip>
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact.a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're
intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
Which gives the lie to Skeeter. You don't hate Joel, you just don't
care.
On 7/24/2026 6:10 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:10:38 -0700, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle >>> we might have to interact.a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're
intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
Which gives the lie to Skeeter. You don't hate Joel, you just don't
care.
But notice how unnecessary it is to do that, the enemy is priming Alan
to "not care", good for him I guess, but I for one am not blind to
meeting people online. It's retarded to have this cold attitude, Alan
is actually a smart guy, I don't agree with him about everything, but I respect him.
On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:41:40 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/24/2026 12:35 AM, Alan wrote:
I have no "respect" for you...I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.a I'm >>>>>>> concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could >>>>>> hate you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only
angle we might have to interact.a You aren't a bad guy at all,
you're intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing
views of computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
So what?a We aren't talking about that.a We're talking about mutual
respect.a I respect you.a I even accept your weirdo affection for
Apple's crapware.a Why do you have to make a point of being
indifferent to me?a Does that make you above me somehow?a Free hint,
it definitely doesn't, that's all in your head.a Don't be a small mind. >>
...just as I don't hate, or even dislike you.
You don't matter to me.
Then you have no soul.
Correction: You don't matter to him. That doesn't make him soulless.
I'm not soulless but lots of people don't matter to me. Like nobody
or C186282 or Xi's massage therapist.
On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:40:20 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/24/2026 12:33 AM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't >>>> give two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way?a Why is meeting people online so
different from real life?a Try lightening up.
I'm completely light.
That's the point.
You come across antisocial.
I don't see it.
He's being honest that you don't matter to him. This is not the same
as active dislike or contempt. It's simple apathy. He has honestly
and politely told you he just ... doesn't care, one way or the other.
On 7/24/2026 6:21 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:40:20 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/24/2026 12:33 AM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't >>>>> give two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way?a Why is meeting people online so
different from real life?a Try lightening up.
I'm completely light.
That's the point.
You come across antisocial.
I don't see it.
He's being honest that you don't matter to him. This is not the same
as active dislike or contempt. It's simple apathy. He has honestly
and politely told you he just ... doesn't care, one way or the other.
I get that. It's just lame. It's not exploring what can be found.
On 2026-07-24 15:31, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/24/2026 6:21 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:40:20 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/24/2026 12:33 AM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't >>>>>> give two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way?a Why is meeting people online so
different from real life?a Try lightening up.
I'm completely light.
That's the point.
You come across antisocial.
I don't see it.
He's being honest that you don't matter to him.a This is not the same
as active dislike or contempt.a It's simple apathy.a He has honestly
and politely told you he just ... doesn't care, one way or the other.
I get that.a It's just lame.a It's not exploring what can be found.
You had your chance to show what you had to offer...
...and I found it...
...lame.
On 7/24/2026 6:44 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-24 15:31, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/24/2026 6:21 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:40:20 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/24/2026 12:33 AM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't >>>>>>> give two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way?a Why is meeting people online so >>>>>> different from real life?a Try lightening up.
I'm completely light.
That's the point.
You come across antisocial.
I don't see it.
He's being honest that you don't matter to him.a This is not the same
as active dislike or contempt.a It's simple apathy.a He has honestly
and politely told you he just ... doesn't care, one way or the other.
I get that.a It's just lame.a It's not exploring what can be found.
You had your chance to show what you had to offer...
...and I found it...
...lame.
The stuff about Apple doesn't matter. There are other matters to be discussed.
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:Nope.
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide >>>>>>> one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back >>>>>> to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy. >>>>>>
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the >>>>>> photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
Oh CRAP!
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07-aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link)
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine, >>>>> that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you >>>>> actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I >>>>> -a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act >>>>> -a> your age.
Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43-aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03-aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy...
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well.
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately. >>
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it.
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:Nope. Utterly false.
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back >>>>> to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:What a surprise. But it's the simple truth.
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote:I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy.
On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impersonate you.
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hugh- huntzinger- the-
plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rec.scuba
thread/post:
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again", within
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the archives of
published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Ling's original
NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions on webpages
without acknowledgement, and used the posting name >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Hugh (NED)
Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually had the
NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This was the ORIGINAL version:
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b
400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dredging up a necro
thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around pulling the same crap but the audience has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence.
You lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy.
Details please
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my >>>>>>>>>>>>>> business as "[my] company website".
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig >>>>>>>>>>>>> employment from others for your services under your
bakermendia moniker which you claim to own.
You knew what a "company website" was...
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a >>>>>>>>>>>> person...
..because you had both yourself.
And here is another lie: Look up this:
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial >>>>>>>>>>> version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better >>>>>>>>>>> impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion... >>>>>>>>>>
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020... >>>>>>>>>>
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018.
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"?
I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years? >>>>>>>>
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what...
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger... >>>>>>>>
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the >>>>>>> photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on
LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the >>>>>>> current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide >>>>>> one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy. >>>>
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link.
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the >>>>> photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major >>>>> illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>>>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their >>>> dates displayed if you like.
Of course.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
In article <1140kh4$10d8d$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 06:14, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upu1$dsbp$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 20:20, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujnl$c78l$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 18:24, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ubcn$83e5$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 16:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113u5ke$83f9$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 15:24, Skeeter wrote:
I do.No... ...you don't.I actually make sense. You run away.Yet here you are humping my leg.Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.Oh you hate when I do it to you?
Nope. I'm (somewhat) amused by it.
Just like me.FIFY
Nope. You just changed my text to (try to) make yourself look better.
I am better.
Isn't that just bragging?
Fact
I see. So any statement one makes is "fact" and any "fact" isn't bragging.
Well I know I am fact.
That you exist...I've never denied it. SOMEONE writes your posts.
The "fact" that you are "better"?
Please. Spare me.
Way better. Are you bragging?
So you ARE bragging.
I never said I didn't brag. I only do it when it's true though.
Nope! The next race is not until August 8-9.
And you're wrong again.
Am I, really?
Got it.
"due".It's Thursday. You're do to run away soon.
You DID dodge!
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a >>>>>>>>>>>> better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
I'm right here you idiot. I already answered you.
No...you dodged.
I did and you ran away.
Thanks for admitting it (finally).I answered you. Your game is no good here.
And what you did isn't a typo.
You still getting ready to do it.
I can promise it.
Yea? You will disappear until Sun night or monday. Work release is a bitch huh?
In article <1140kid$10d8d$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 06:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upve$dsbp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113uk30$c9ld$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>>>
On 7/23/2026 10:48 PM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way? Why is meeting people online so
different from real life? Try lightening up.
Because I would have slapped you silly in real life.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Whatever you need to believe, Cupcake!
We all know it's true. Your nervous laughter shows it.
How does one get "nervous" from text, Cupcake?
You show it just before you raise that flag.
In article <1140kjs$10d8d$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 06:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upvp$dsbp$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujpg$c78l$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...Nope!
On 2026-07-23 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ue2e$alss$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.-a I'm >>>>>>>>>>> concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is. >>>>>>>>>>
you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact.-a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're >>>>>>>>> intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of >>>>>>>>> computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
Says the guy who stomps his feet when we make him look silly.
Really?
Give an example.
Nope.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
Because you hate him.
Same as you, Cupcake.
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give >>>>>> two straws about you.
:-)
Yes you do.
Oh you do. Your posting shows it.
How is my posting different than yours, Cupcake?
You're obsessed.
In article <1140kl3$10d8d$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:15, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 7:10 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113or7k$2cf7j$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-21 15:15, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113oq7e$2cf7j$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>
On 2026-07-21 14:18, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113olf4$2amc8$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about >>>>>>>>>> the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a >>>>>>>>>> major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are >>>>>>>>>> the same
person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>>>>>>>>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken >>>>>>>>> October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-
IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/view?usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018: >>>>>>>>>
<https://drive.google.com/file/
d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/view?usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Yet you continue to do it. Is it an obsession?
Really?
What lies have I ever told?
Not enough bandwidth to list them all.
I didn't ask you for an exhaustive list...
...so how about you just start with ONE.
You never convinced me you were a race car driver.
That is not a lie. The self-reported quality of that driving is a lie.
Good enough for the second fastest lap ever around Mission Raceway
(prior to it's latest renovation)
You got to watch? Did you get pics?
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the >>>>> photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major >>>>> illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>>>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken
October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/
view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/
view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide >>>>>>> one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back >>>>>> to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the >>>>>> photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change >>>>>> into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
Oh CRAP!
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5 >>>>> times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link)
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine, >>>>> that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you >>>>> actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential >>>>> a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I >>>>> a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act >>>>> a> your age.
Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy...
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well.
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it.
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:Nope. Utterly false.
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back >>>>> to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:What a surprise. But it's the simple truth.
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote:I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impersonate you.
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hugh- huntzinger- the-
plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rec.scuba
thread/post:
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again", within
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the archives of
published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Ling's original
NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions on webpages
without acknowledgement, and used the posting name >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Hugh (NED)
Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually had the
NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This was the ORIGINAL version: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b
400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dredging up a necro
thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around pulling the same crap but the audience has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence.
You lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy.
Details please
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my >>>>>>>>>>>>>> business as "[my] company website".
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig >>>>>>>>>>>>> employment from others for your services under your >>>>>>>>>>>>> bakermendia moniker which you claim to own.
You knew what a "company website" was...
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a >>>>>>>>>>>> person...
..because you had both yourself.
And here is another lie: Look up this:
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial >>>>>>>>>>> version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better >>>>>>>>>>> impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion... >>>>>>>>>>
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020... >>>>>>>>>>
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018.
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"?
I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years? >>>>>>>>
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what...
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger... >>>>>>>>
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the >>>>>>> photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on
LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the >>>>>>> current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide >>>>>> one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy. >>>>
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link.
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the >>>>> photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major >>>>> illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>>>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their >>>> dates displayed if you like.
Of course.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
You know I can imagine someone who doesn't lie?
You're right!
On 2026-07-24 16:15, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kh4$10d8d$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 06:14, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upu1$dsbp$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 20:20, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujnl$c78l$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 18:24, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ubcn$83e5$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 16:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113u5ke$83f9$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 15:24, Skeeter wrote:
I do.No... ...you don't.I actually make sense. You run away.Yet here you are humping my leg.Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.Oh you hate when I do it to you?
Nope. I'm (somewhat) amused by it.
Just like me.FIFY
Nope. You just changed my text to (try to) make yourself look better.
I am better.
Isn't that just bragging?
Fact
I see. So any statement one makes is "fact" and any "fact" isn't bragging.
Well I know I am fact.
That you exist...I've never denied it. SOMEONE writes your posts.
The "fact" that you are "better"?
Please. Spare me.
Way better. Are you bragging?
So you ARE bragging.
I never said I didn't brag. I only do it when it's true though.
And I only say things about myself that are true.
:-)
And you're wrong again.
Am I, really?
Got it.
"due".It's Thursday. You're do to run away soon.
You DID dodge!
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
I'm right here you idiot. I already answered you.
No...you dodged.
I did and you ran away.
Thanks for admitting it (finally).I answered you. Your game is no good here.
And what you did isn't a typo.
You still getting ready to do it.
I can promise it.
Yea? You will disappear until Sun night or monday. Work release is a bitch huh?Nope! The next race is not until August 8-9.
:-)--
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kid$10d8d$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 06:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upve$dsbp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113uk30$c9ld$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>>>
On 7/23/2026 10:48 PM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way? Why is meeting people online so >>>>>> different from real life? Try lightening up.
Because I would have slapped you silly in real life.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Whatever you need to believe, Cupcake!
We all know it's true. Your nervous laughter shows it.
How does one get "nervous" from text, Cupcake?
You show it just before you raise that flag.
Is that right?
I was laughing at the idea that you could "slap[] me silly in real
life", Cupcake.
You're old. I'm not young, but I'm actually fit.
On 2026-07-24 16:18, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kjs$10d8d$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 06:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upvp$dsbp$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujpg$c78l$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>Nope!
On 2026-07-23 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ue2e$alss$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.a I'm >>>>>>>>>>> concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is. >>>>>>>>>>
you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact.a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're >>>>>>>>> intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of >>>>>>>>> computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
Says the guy who stomps his feet when we make him look silly.
Really?
Give an example.
Nope.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
Because you hate him.
Same as you, Cupcake.
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yes you do.
Oh you do. Your posting shows it.
How is my posting different than yours, Cupcake?
You're obsessed.
You reply to me in sub-threads where you aren't even involved, Cupcake.
On 2026-07-24 16:18, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kl3$10d8d$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:15, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 7:10 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113or7k$2cf7j$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>
On 2026-07-21 15:15, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113oq7e$2cf7j$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>
On 2026-07-21 14:18, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113olf4$2amc8$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about >>>>>>>>>> the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a >>>>>>>>>> major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are >>>>>>>>>> the same
person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>>>>>>>>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken >>>>>>>>> October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-
IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/view?usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/
d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/view?usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Yet you continue to do it. Is it an obsession?
Really?
What lies have I ever told?
Not enough bandwidth to list them all.
I didn't ask you for an exhaustive list...
...so how about you just start with ONE.
You never convinced me you were a race car driver.
That is not a lie. The self-reported quality of that driving is a lie.
Good enough for the second fastest lap ever around Mission Raceway
(prior to it's latest renovation)
You got to watch? Did you get pics?
Weak even for you.
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the >>>>> photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major >>>>> illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>>>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken
October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/
view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018: >>>>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/
view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide >>>>>>>>> one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>>Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back >>>>>>>> to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the >>>>>>>> photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a >>>>>>>> major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change >>>>>>>> into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
Oh CRAP!
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5 >>>>>>> times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07-aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link)
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine, >>>>>>> that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you >>>>>>> actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body >>>>>>> language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
-a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential >>>>>>> -a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I >>>>>>> -a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
-a> your age.
-a>
-a> Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43-aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03-aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy...
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well.
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
In article <1140ua9$13147$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it.
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:Nope. Utterly false.
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back >>>>>>> to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:What a surprise. But it's the simple truth.
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote:I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impersonate you.
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hugh- huntzinger- the-
plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rec.scuba
thread/post:
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again", within
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the archives of
published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Ling's original
NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions on webpages
without acknowledgement, and used the posting name >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Hugh (NED)
Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually had the
NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This was the ORIGINAL version: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b
400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dredging up a necro
thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around pulling the same crap but the audience has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence.
You lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy.
Details please
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business as "[my] company website".
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employment from others for your services under your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bakermendia moniker which you claim to own.
You knew what a "company website" was...
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> person...
..because you had both yourself.
And here is another lie: Look up this:
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial >>>>>>>>>>>>> version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better >>>>>>>>>>>>> impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion... >>>>>>>>>>>>
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020... >>>>>>>>>>>>
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018. >>>>>>>>>>>>
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"?
I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years? >>>>>>>>>>
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what...
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger... >>>>>>>>>>
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the >>>>>>>>> photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on
LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the >>>>>>>>> current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide >>>>>>>> one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy. >>>>>>
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link.
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the >>>>>>> photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major >>>>>>> illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>>>>>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their >>>>>> dates displayed if you like.
Of course.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
You know I can imagine someone who doesn't lie?
You're right!
Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed.
In article <1140ucb$13147$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...Seems you cared when you thought you had a "gotcha" moment.
On 2026-07-24 16:15, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kh4$10d8d$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 06:14, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upu1$dsbp$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 20:20, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujnl$c78l$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 18:24, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ubcn$83e5$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 16:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113u5ke$83f9$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 15:24, Skeeter wrote:
I do.No... ...you don't.I actually make sense. You run away.Yet here you are humping my leg.Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.Oh you hate when I do it to you?
Nope. I'm (somewhat) amused by it.
Just like me.FIFY
Nope. You just changed my text to (try to) make yourself look better.
I am better.
Isn't that just bragging?
Fact
I see. So any statement one makes is "fact" and any "fact" isn't bragging.
Well I know I am fact.
That you exist...I've never denied it. SOMEONE writes your posts.
The "fact" that you are "better"?
Please. Spare me.
Way better. Are you bragging?
So you ARE bragging.
I never said I didn't brag. I only do it when it's true though.
And I only say things about myself that are true.
But never back it up.
:-)
Nope! The next race is not until August 8-9.
And you're wrong again.
Am I, really?
Got it.
"due".It's Thursday. You're do to run away soon.
You DID dodge!
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
I'm right here you idiot. I already answered you.
No...you dodged.
I did and you ran away.
Thanks for admitting it (finally).I answered you. Your game is no good here.
And what you did isn't a typo.
You still getting ready to do it.
I can promise it.
Yea? You will disappear until Sun night or monday. Work release is a bitch huh?
No one cares.
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide >>>>>>>>> one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>>Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back >>>>>>>> to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the >>>>>>>> photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a >>>>>>>> major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change >>>>>>>> into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
Oh CRAP!
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5 >>>>>>> times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link)
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background, >>>>>>> looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine, >>>>>>> that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you >>>>>>> actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body >>>>>>> language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential >>>>>>> a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
a> your age.
a>
a> Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy...
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF >>>>>> leadership about the images for the site as well.
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
In article <1140ue0$13147$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...You know nothing about me...
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kid$10d8d$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 06:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upve$dsbp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113uk30$c9ld$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 7/23/2026 10:48 PM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way? Why is meeting people online so >>>>>>>> different from real life? Try lightening up.
Because I would have slapped you silly in real life.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Whatever you need to believe, Cupcake!
We all know it's true. Your nervous laughter shows it.
How does one get "nervous" from text, Cupcake?
You show it just before you raise that flag.
Is that right?
I was laughing at the idea that you could "slap[] me silly in real
life", Cupcake.
You're old. I'm not young, but I'm actually fit.
Yea sure. You know nothing about me little fella. But you Canadians are a lot braver behind a keyboard 1000s of miles away.
In article <1140uf3$13147$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:18, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kjs$10d8d$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 06:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upvp$dsbp$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujpg$c78l$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>Nope!
On 2026-07-23 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ue2e$alss$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>Really?
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.-a I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>> concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is. >>>>>>>>>>>>
you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact.-a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're >>>>>>>>>>> intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of >>>>>>>>>>> computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
Says the guy who stomps his feet when we make him look silly. >>>>>>>>
Give an example.
Nope.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
Because you hate him.
Same as you, Cupcake.
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yes you do.
Oh you do. Your posting shows it.
How is my posting different than yours, Cupcake?
You're obsessed.
You reply to me in sub-threads where you aren't even involved, Cupcake.
It's called usenet. That's how it works. Stick around and you will learn.
In article <1140ug2$13147$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:18, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kl3$10d8d$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:15, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 7:10 PM, Skeeter wrote:Good enough for the second fastest lap ever around Mission Raceway
In article <113or7k$2cf7j$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>
On 2026-07-21 15:15, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113oq7e$2cf7j$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-21 14:18, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113olf4$2amc8$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about >>>>>>>>>>>> the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a >>>>>>>>>>>> major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are >>>>>>>>>>>> the same
person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>>>>>>>>>>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken >>>>>>>>>>> October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-
IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/view?usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/
d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/view?usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Yet you continue to do it. Is it an obsession?
Really?
What lies have I ever told?
Not enough bandwidth to list them all.
I didn't ask you for an exhaustive list...
...so how about you just start with ONE.
You never convinced me you were a race car driver.
That is not a lie. The self-reported quality of that driving is a lie. >>>>
(prior to it's latest renovation)
You got to watch? Did you get pics?
Weak even for you.
Kinda hit a weak spot didn't I?
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide >>>>>>>>>>> one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>>>>Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back >>>>>>>>>> to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the >>>>>>>>>> photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a >>>>>>>>>> major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change >>>>>>>>>> into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
Oh CRAP!
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5 >>>>>>>>> times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07-aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link)
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background, >>>>>>>>> looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine, >>>>>>>>> that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you >>>>>>>>> actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body >>>>>>>>> language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
-a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential >>>>>>>>> -a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
-a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
-a> your age.
-a>
-a> Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43-aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page. >>>>>>>>>
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03-aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy...
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF >>>>>>>> leadership about the images for the site as well.
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
In article <1140ugt$13147$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the >>>>>>> photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major >>>>>>> illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>>>>>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken >>>>>> October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/ >>>>>> view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018: >>>>>>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/ >>>>>> view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
No, you tried and failed. You're losing your squeak. I need a new kick toy. So
why is Rudy and Snit and that other guy arguing about you? You hate all of them.
On 2026-07-24 17:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ucb$13147$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:15, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kh4$10d8d$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 06:14, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upu1$dsbp$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 20:20, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujnl$c78l$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 18:24, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ubcn$83e5$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 16:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113u5ke$83f9$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 15:24, Skeeter wrote:
I do.No... ...you don't.I actually make sense. You run away.Yet here you are humping my leg.Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.Oh you hate when I do it to you?
Nope. I'm (somewhat) amused by it.
Just like me.FIFY
Nope. You just changed my text to (try to) make yourself look better.
I am better.
Isn't that just bragging?
Fact
I see. So any statement one makes is "fact" and any "fact" isn't bragging.
Well I know I am fact.
That you exist...I've never denied it. SOMEONE writes your posts. >>>>>>
The "fact" that you are "better"?
Please. Spare me.
Way better. Are you bragging?
So you ARE bragging.
I never said I didn't brag. I only do it when it's true though.
And I only say things about myself that are true.
But never back it up.
:-)
Nope! The next race is not until August 8-9.
And you're wrong again.
Am I, really?
Got it.
"due".It's Thursday. You're do to run away soon.
You DID dodge!
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
I'm right here you idiot. I already answered you.
No...you dodged.
I did and you ran away.
Thanks for admitting it (finally).I answered you. Your game is no good here.
And what you did isn't a typo.
You still getting ready to do it.
I can promise it.
Yea? You will disappear until Sun night or monday. Work release is a bitch huh?
No one cares.Seems you cared when you thought you had a "gotcha" moment.
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ua9$13147$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it.
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back >>>>>>> to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:What a surprise. But it's the simple truth.
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote:
I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impersonate you.
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hugh- huntzinger- the-
plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rec.scuba
thread/post:
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again", within
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the archives of
published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Ling's original
NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions on webpages
without acknowledgement, and used the posting name >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Hugh (NED)
Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually had the
NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.
This was the ORIGINAL version: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b
400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dredging up a necro
thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around pulling the same crap but the audience has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence.
You lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy.
Details please
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business as "[my] company website".
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employment from others for your services under your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bakermendia moniker which you claim to own.
You knew what a "company website" was...
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> person...
..because you had both yourself.
And here is another lie: Look up this:
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial >>>>>>>>>>>>> version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better >>>>>>>>>>>>> impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion... >>>>>>>>>>>>
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020... >>>>>>>>>>>>
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018. >>>>>>>>>>>>
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"?
I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years? >>>>>>>>>>
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what...
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger... >>>>>>>>>>
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the >>>>>>>>> photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on >>>>>>>>> LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the >>>>>>>>> current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide >>>>>>>> one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
Nope. Utterly false.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link.
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the >>>>>>> photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major >>>>>>> illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>>>>>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their >>>>>> dates displayed if you like.
Of course.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
You know I can imagine someone who doesn't lie?
You're right!
Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed.
Run away, Cupcake!
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provideNot true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>>>>
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a >>>>>>>>>> major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change >>>>>>>>>> into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
Oh CRAP!
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5 >>>>>>>>> times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link)
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background, >>>>>>>>> looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body >>>>>>>>> language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
a> your age.
a>
a> Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page. >>>>>>>>>
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had. >>>>>>>>>
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy...
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF >>>>>>>> leadership about the images for the site as well.
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
On 2026-07-24 17:41, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ue0$13147$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kid$10d8d$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 06:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upve$dsbp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113uk30$c9ld$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 10:48 PM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way? Why is meeting people online so >>>>>>>> different from real life? Try lightening up.
Because I would have slapped you silly in real life.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Whatever you need to believe, Cupcake!
We all know it's true. Your nervous laughter shows it.
How does one get "nervous" from text, Cupcake?
You show it just before you raise that flag.
Is that right?
I was laughing at the idea that you could "slap[] me silly in real
life", Cupcake.
You're old. I'm not young, but I'm actually fit.
Yea sure. You know nothing about me little fella. But you Canadians are a lotYou know nothing about me...
braver behind a keyboard 1000s of miles away.
...but I'll tell you I play ice hockey 3-5 times a week all winter.
On 2026-07-24 17:42, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140uf3$13147$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:18, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kjs$10d8d$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 06:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upvp$dsbp$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujpg$c78l$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>Nope!
On 2026-07-23 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ue2e$alss$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>Really?
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.a I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is. >>>>>>>>>>>>
you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact.a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're >>>>>>>>>>> intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of >>>>>>>>>>> computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
Says the guy who stomps his feet when we make him look silly. >>>>>>>>
Give an example.
Nope.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
Because you hate him.
Same as you, Cupcake.
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yes you do.
Oh you do. Your posting shows it.
How is my posting different than yours, Cupcake?
You're obsessed.
You reply to me in sub-threads where you aren't even involved, Cupcake.
It's called usenet. That's how it works. Stick around and you will learn.
But me replying to you when you've replied to me with no prior involvement...
...somehow that's me being obsessed, Cupcake?
On 2026-07-24 17:43, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ug2$13147$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:18, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kl3$10d8d$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:15, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 7:10 PM, Skeeter wrote:Good enough for the second fastest lap ever around Mission Raceway
In article <113or7k$2cf7j$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>
On 2026-07-21 15:15, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113oq7e$2cf7j$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-21 14:18, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113olf4$2amc8$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about >>>>>>>>>>>> the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a >>>>>>>>>>>> major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are >>>>>>>>>>>> the same
person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>>>>>>>>>>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken
October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-
IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/view?usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/
d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/view?usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Yet you continue to do it. Is it an obsession?
Really?
What lies have I ever told?
Not enough bandwidth to list them all.
I didn't ask you for an exhaustive list...
...so how about you just start with ONE.
You never convinced me you were a race car driver.
That is not a lie. The self-reported quality of that driving is a lie. >>>>
(prior to it's latest renovation)
You got to watch? Did you get pics?
Weak even for you.
Kinda hit a weak spot didn't I?
Nope.
I know what I did, and so does Liarboy Tommy.
On 2026-07-24 17:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ugt$13147$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the >>>>>>> photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major >>>>>>> illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>>>>>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken >>>>>> October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/ >>>>>> view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018: >>>>>>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/ >>>>>> view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
No, you tried and failed. You're losing your squeak. I need a new kick toy. So
why is Rudy and Snit and that other guy arguing about you? You hate all of them.
Nope.
I have proven what I say on numerous occasions.
And I don't hate ANY of them.
None of you are important enough to hate.
In article <114118d$13evc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ugt$13147$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the >>>>>>>>> photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major >>>>>>>>> illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>>>>>>>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken >>>>>>>> October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/ >>>>>>>> view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018: >>>>>>>>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/ >>>>>>>> view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
No, you tried and failed. You're losing your squeak. I need a new kick toy. So
why is Rudy and Snit and that other guy arguing about you? You hate all of >>> them.
Nope.
I have proven what I say on numerous occasions.
Very few.
And I don't hate ANY of them.
You do.
How is declaring you not important enough to hate in any way bragging?
None of you are important enough to hate.
Uh huh. Bragging again?
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provideNot true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a >>>>>>>>>>>> major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change >>>>>>>>>>>> into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
Oh CRAP!
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5 >>>>>>>>>>> times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07-aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link)
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background, >>>>>>>>>>> looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body >>>>>>>>>>> language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
-a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
-a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
-a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
-a> your age.
-a>
-a> Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit. >>>>>>>>>>>
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43-aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page. >>>>>>>>>>>
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had. >>>>>>>>>>>
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03-aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy...
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF >>>>>>>>>> leadership about the images for the site as well.
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
In article <11410ua$1383u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ua9$13147$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it.
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back >>>>>>>>> to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:What a surprise. But it's the simple truth.
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote:I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years? >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote:Details please
On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote:
I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impersonate you.
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hugh- huntzinger- the-
plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rec.scuba
thread/post:
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again", within
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the archives of
published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Ling's original
NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions on webpages
without acknowledgement, and used the posting name >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Hugh (NED)
Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually had the
NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.
This was the ORIGINAL version: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b
400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dredging up a necro
thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around pulling the same crap but the audience has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence.
You lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business as "[my] company website".
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employment from others for your services under your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bakermendia moniker which you claim to own.
You knew what a "company website" was...
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person...
..because you had both yourself.
And here is another lie: Look up this:
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what...
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger... >>>>>>>>>>>>
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the >>>>>>>>>>> photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on >>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the >>>>>>>>>>> current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide >>>>>>>>>> one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>>>
Nope. Utterly false.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link.
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the >>>>>>>>> photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major >>>>>>>>> illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into >>>>>>>>> whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their >>>>>>>> dates displayed if you like.
Of course.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
You know I can imagine someone who doesn't lie?
You're right!
Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed.
Run away, Cupcake!
He's begging me to leave so he can claim some false win. What a tryhard you are.
In article <11410v3$1383u$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ucb$13147$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:15, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kh4$10d8d$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 06:14, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upu1$dsbp$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 20:20, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujnl$c78l$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 18:24, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ubcn$83e5$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 16:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113u5ke$83f9$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 15:24, Skeeter wrote:
I do.No... ...you don't.I actually make sense. You run away.Yet here you are humping my leg.Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run.Oh you hate when I do it to you?
Nope. I'm (somewhat) amused by it.
Just like me.FIFY
Nope. You just changed my text to (try to) make yourself look better.
I am better.
Isn't that just bragging?
Fact
I see. So any statement one makes is "fact" and any "fact" isn't bragging.
Well I know I am fact.
That you exist...I've never denied it. SOMEONE writes your posts. >>>>>>>>
The "fact" that you are "better"?
Please. Spare me.
Way better. Are you bragging?
So you ARE bragging.
I never said I didn't brag. I only do it when it's true though.
And I only say things about myself that are true.
But never back it up.
Crickets.
Bragging again.Seems you cared when you thought you had a "gotcha" moment.
:-)
Nope! The next race is not until August 8-9.
And you're wrong again.
Am I, really?
Got it.
"due".It's Thursday. You're do to run away soon.
You DID dodge!
No...you dodged.When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
I'm right here you idiot. I already answered you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I did and you ran away.
Thanks for admitting it (finally).I answered you. Your game is no good here.
And what you did isn't a typo.
You still getting ready to do it.
I can promise it.
Yea? You will disappear until Sun night or monday. Work release is a bitch huh?
No one cares.
Is that what you snowballs call it? You take this shit way to serious. I have playing your troll game for years and you're good at it but I'm better.
In article <1141105$1383u$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
So? Fag game. But you don't. Did you get benched in shinny too?
On 2026-07-24 17:41, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ue0$13147$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...You know nothing about me...
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kid$10d8d$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 06:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upve$dsbp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113uk30$c9ld$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 10:48 PM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way? Why is meeting people online so >>>>>>>>>> different from real life? Try lightening up.
Because I would have slapped you silly in real life.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Whatever you need to believe, Cupcake!
We all know it's true. Your nervous laughter shows it.
How does one get "nervous" from text, Cupcake?
You show it just before you raise that flag.
Is that right?
I was laughing at the idea that you could "slap[] me silly in real
life", Cupcake.
You're old. I'm not young, but I'm actually fit.
Yea sure. You know nothing about me little fella. But you Canadians are a lot
braver behind a keyboard 1000s of miles away.
...but I'll tell you I play ice hockey 3-5 times a week all winter.
In article <114111h$1383u$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:42, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140uf3$13147$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
It's called usenet. That's how it works. Stick around and you will learn. >>>
On 2026-07-24 16:18, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kjs$10d8d$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 06:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upvp$dsbp$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujpg$c78l$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>Nope!
On 2026-07-23 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ue2e$alss$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>Really?
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.-a I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact.-a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're >>>>>>>>>>>>> intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of >>>>>>>>>>>>> computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
Says the guy who stomps his feet when we make him look silly. >>>>>>>>>>
Give an example.
Nope.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
Because you hate him.
Same as you, Cupcake.
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yes you do.
Oh you do. Your posting shows it.
How is my posting different than yours, Cupcake?
You're obsessed.
You reply to me in sub-threads where you aren't even involved, Cupcake. >>>
But me replying to you when you've replied to me with no prior
involvement...
...somehow that's me being obsessed, Cupcake?
Who's on first, What's on second and I don't know is on third.
Blah Blah
On 2026-07-24 18:32, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114118d$13evc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ugt$13147$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken >>>>>>>> October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/ >>>>>>>> view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018: >>>>>>>>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/ >>>>>>>> view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
No, you tried and failed. You're losing your squeak. I need a new kick toy. So
why is Rudy and Snit and that other guy arguing about you? You hate all of
them.
Nope.
I have proven what I say on numerous occasions.
Very few.
So you admit I do prove what I say.
Got it.
And I don't hate ANY of them.
You do.
Nope.
None of you are important enough to hate.
Uh huh. Bragging again?How is declaring you not important enough to hate in any way bragging?
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provideNot true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a >>>>>>>>>>>> major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change >>>>>>>>>>>> into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
Oh CRAP!
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link) >>>>>>>>>>>
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background, >>>>>>>>>>> looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body >>>>>>>>>>> language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
a> your age.
a>
a> Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit. >>>>>>>>>>>
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page. >>>>>>>>>>>
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had. >>>>>>>>>>>
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy...
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF >>>>>>>>>> leadership about the images for the site as well.
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
On 2026-07-24 18:00, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410ua$1383u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ua9$13147$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it.
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:What a surprise. But it's the simple truth.
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote:I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years? >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote:You knew what a "company website" was...
On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote:Details please
On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impersonate you.400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/
hugh- huntzinger- the- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a
rec.scuba
thread/post:
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again", within
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for
the archives of
published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist
Bob Ling's original
NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions on webpages
without acknowledgement, and used the posting name
of Hugh (NED)
Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he
actually had the
NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.
This was the ORIGINAL version: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dredging up a necro
thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around pulling the same crap but the audience has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not
using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence.
You lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly
for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business as "[my] company website".
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website
of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employment from others for your services under your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bakermendia moniker which you claim to own. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person...
..because you had both yourself.
And here is another lie: Look up this:
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better
impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what...
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger... >>>>>>>>>>>>
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the >>>>>>>>>>> photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on >>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the >>>>>>>>>>> current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide >>>>>>>>>> one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>>>
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
Nope. Utterly false.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link.
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their
dates displayed if you like.
Of course.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
You know I can imagine someone who doesn't lie?
You're right!
Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed.
Run away, Cupcake!
He's begging me to leave so he can claim some false win. What a tryhard you are.
Hey...you're the one who declared "Thread closed."...
..but still can't let it go.
On 2026-07-24 17:57, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410v3$1383u$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ucb$13147$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:15, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kh4$10d8d$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 06:14, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upu1$dsbp$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 20:20, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujnl$c78l$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 18:24, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ubcn$83e5$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 16:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113u5ke$83f9$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 15:24, Skeeter wrote:
I do.No... ...you don't.I actually make sense. You run away.Yet here you are humping my leg.Or you mine.
How are you different, Cupcake?
When asked to justify your bullshit: you run. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh you hate when I do it to you?
Nope. I'm (somewhat) amused by it.
Just like me.FIFY
Nope. You just changed my text to (try to) make yourself look better.
I am better.
Isn't that just bragging?
Fact
I see. So any statement one makes is "fact" and any "fact" isn't bragging.
Well I know I am fact.
That you exist...I've never denied it. SOMEONE writes your posts. >>>>>>>>
The "fact" that you are "better"?
Please. Spare me.
Way better. Are you bragging?
So you ARE bragging.
I never said I didn't brag. I only do it when it's true though.
And I only say things about myself that are true.
But never back it up.
Crickets.
Not worth my time, Cupcake.
Seems you cared when you thought you had a "gotcha" moment.
:-)
Nope! The next race is not until August 8-9.
And you're wrong again.
Am I, really?
Got it.
"due".It's Thursday. You're do to run away soon.
You DID dodge!
No...you dodged.When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
I'm right here you idiot. I already answered you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I did and you ran away.
Thanks for admitting it (finally).I answered you. Your game is no good here.
And what you did isn't a typo.
You still getting ready to do it.
I can promise it.
Yea? You will disappear until Sun night or monday. Work release is a bitch huh?
No one cares.
Is that what you snowballs call it? You take this shit way to serious. I haveBragging again.
playing your troll game for years and you're good at it but I'm better.
On 2026-07-24 18:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1141105$1383u$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
So? Fag game. But you don't. Did you get benched in shinny too?
On 2026-07-24 17:41, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ue0$13147$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...You know nothing about me...
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kid$10d8d$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 06:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upve$dsbp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113uk30$c9ld$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 10:48 PM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way? Why is meeting people online so >>>>>>>>>> different from real life? Try lightening up.
Because I would have slapped you silly in real life.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Whatever you need to believe, Cupcake!
We all know it's true. Your nervous laughter shows it.
How does one get "nervous" from text, Cupcake?
You show it just before you raise that flag.
Is that right?
I was laughing at the idea that you could "slap[] me silly in real
life", Cupcake.
You're old. I'm not young, but I'm actually fit.
Yea sure. You know nothing about me little fella. But you Canadians are a lot
braver behind a keyboard 1000s of miles away.
...but I'll tell you I play ice hockey 3-5 times a week all winter.
Ice hockey? "Fag game"?
What's your sport, Cupcake; assuming you get get out of your wheelchair?
On 2026-07-24 18:30, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114111h$1383u$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:42, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140uf3$13147$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
It's called usenet. That's how it works. Stick around and you will learn. >>>
On 2026-07-24 16:18, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kjs$10d8d$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 06:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upvp$dsbp$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujpg$c78l$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>Nope!
On 2026-07-23 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ue2e$alss$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...Really?
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.a I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact.a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're >>>>>>>>>>>>> intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
Says the guy who stomps his feet when we make him look silly. >>>>>>>>>>
Give an example.
Nope.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
Because you hate him.
Same as you, Cupcake.
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yes you do.
Oh you do. Your posting shows it.
How is my posting different than yours, Cupcake?
You're obsessed.
You reply to me in sub-threads where you aren't even involved, Cupcake. >>>
But me replying to you when you've replied to me with no prior
involvement...
...somehow that's me being obsessed, Cupcake?
Who's on first, What's on second and I don't know is on third.
Blah Blah
Yeah...
Blather was your best response.
On 2026-07-24 18:32, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114118d$13evc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ugt$13147$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken >>>>>>>> October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/ >>>>>>>> view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018: >>>>>>>>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/ >>>>>>>> view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
No, you tried and failed. You're losing your squeak. I need a new kick toy. So
why is Rudy and Snit and that other guy arguing about you? You hate all of
them.
Nope.
I have proven what I say on numerous occasions.
Very few.
So you admit I do prove what I say.
Got it.
And I don't hate ANY of them.
You do.
Nope.
None of you are important enough to hate.
Uh huh. Bragging again?How is declaring you not important enough to hate in any way bragging?
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provideNot true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a >>>>>>>>>>>> major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change >>>>>>>>>>>> into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
Oh CRAP!
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link) >>>>>>>>>>>
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background, >>>>>>>>>>> looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body >>>>>>>>>>> language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
a> your age.
a>
a> Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit. >>>>>>>>>>>
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page. >>>>>>>>>>>
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had. >>>>>>>>>>>
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy...
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF >>>>>>>>>> leadership about the images for the site as well.
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
You're such an attention begging idiot.
On 7/24/2026 11:29 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Alan is a trouble maker. You are best to ignore him.
No. Alan has posted some valuable stuff. I consider him an ally.
He will turn on you as soon as he has a bad day.
Should I believe you, instead?
On 7/24/2026 6:21 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:40:20 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/24/2026 12:33 AM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't >>>>>> give two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way?a Why is meeting people online so
different from real life?a Try lightening up.
I'm completely light.
That's the point.
You come across antisocial.
I don't see it.
He's being honest that you don't matter to him. This is not the same
as active dislike or contempt. It's simple apathy. He has honestly
and politely told you he just ... doesn't care, one way or the other.
I get that. It's just lame. It's not exploring what can be found.
Skeeter wrote:
You're such an attention begging idiot.
And you give it to him.
On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:43:10 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/24/2026 11:29 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Alan is a trouble maker. You are best to ignore him.
Guilty dog hollers first.
No. Alan has posted some valuable stuff. I consider him an ally.
He will turn on you as soon as he has a bad day.
Wouldn't we all!
Should I believe you, instead?
That's the question. Who's up in here stirring the pot?
On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 18:31:48 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/24/2026 6:21 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:40:20 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/24/2026 12:33 AM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't >>>>>> give two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way?a Why is meeting people online so
different from real life?a Try lightening up.
I'm completely light.
That's the point.
You come across antisocial.
I don't see it.
He's being honest that you don't matter to him. This is not the same
as active dislike or contempt. It's simple apathy. He has honestly
and politely told you he just ... doesn't care, one way or the other.
I get that. It's just lame. It's not exploring what can be found.
Who wants to explore anything?
In article <11414lm$14htd$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
Oh CRAP!No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provideNot true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change >>>>>>>>>>>>>> into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07-aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background, >>>>>>>>>>>>> looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body >>>>>>>>>>>>> language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
-a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
-a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
-a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
-a> your age.
-a>
-a> Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43-aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03-aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy...
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF >>>>>>>>>>>> leadership about the images for the site as well.
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
Not your choice. You are like a clown.
In article <11414mj$14htd$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:00, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410ua$1383u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ua9$13147$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it.
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:What a surprise. But it's the simple truth.
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote:I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote:You knew what a "company website" was...
On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote:Details please
On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impersonate you.400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/
hugh- huntzinger- the- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a
rec.scuba
thread/post:
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again", within
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for
the archives of
published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist
Bob Ling's original
NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions on webpages >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name
of Hugh (NED)
Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he
actually had the
NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.
This was the ORIGINAL version: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dredging up a necro
thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around pulling the same crap but the audience has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not
using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence.
You lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly
for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business as "[my] company website".
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website
of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employment from others for your services under your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bakermendia moniker which you claim to own. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person...
..because you had both yourself.
And here is another lie: Look up this:
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better
impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what...
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the >>>>>>>>>>>>> photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on >>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the >>>>>>>>>>>>> current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide >>>>>>>>>>>> one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>>>>>
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
Nope. Utterly false.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link.
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their
dates displayed if you like.
Of course.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
You know I can imagine someone who doesn't lie?
You're right!
Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed.
Run away, Cupcake!
He's begging me to leave so he can claim some false win. What a tryhard you >>> are.
Hey...you're the one who declared "Thread closed."...
..but still can't let it go.
It's my thread. I do as I please.
In article <11414pb$14htd$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...Really? You think I'm upset?
On 2026-07-24 18:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1141105$1383u$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
So? Fag game. But you don't. Did you get benched in shinny too?
On 2026-07-24 17:41, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ue0$13147$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>You know nothing about me...
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kid$10d8d$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 06:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upve$dsbp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113uk30$c9ld$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 10:48 PM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way? Why is meeting people online so >>>>>>>>>>>> different from real life? Try lightening up.
Because I would have slapped you silly in real life.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Whatever you need to believe, Cupcake!
We all know it's true. Your nervous laughter shows it.
How does one get "nervous" from text, Cupcake?
You show it just before you raise that flag.
Is that right?
I was laughing at the idea that you could "slap[] me silly in real >>>>>> life", Cupcake.
You're old. I'm not young, but I'm actually fit.
Yea sure. You know nothing about me little fella. But you Canadians are a lot
braver behind a keyboard 1000s of miles away.
...but I'll tell you I play ice hockey 3-5 times a week all winter.
Ice hockey? "Fag game"?
What's your sport, Cupcake; assuming you get get out of your wheelchair?
LOL Look at you all upset again. You say the childish things when you're upset.
In article <11414q4$14htd$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:30, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114111h$1383u$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:42, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140uf3$13147$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:18, Skeeter wrote:It's called usenet. That's how it works. Stick around and you will learn. >>>>>
In article <1140kjs$10d8d$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 06:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upvp$dsbp$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujpg$c78l$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>Nope!
On 2026-07-23 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ue2e$alss$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...Really?
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.-a I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact.-a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're
intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
Says the guy who stomps his feet when we make him look silly. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Give an example.
Nope.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
Because you hate him.
Same as you, Cupcake.
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yes you do.
Oh you do. Your posting shows it.
How is my posting different than yours, Cupcake?
You're obsessed.
You reply to me in sub-threads where you aren't even involved, Cupcake. >>>>>
But me replying to you when you've replied to me with no prior
involvement...
...somehow that's me being obsessed, Cupcake?
Who's on first, What's on second and I don't know is on third.
Blah Blah
Yeah...
Blather was your best response.
Just responding in kind. I don't want to overwhelm you.
In article <11414kg$14htd$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:32, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114118d$13evc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ugt$13147$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken >>>>>>>>>> October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/ >>>>>>>>>> view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018: >>>>>>>>>>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/ >>>>>>>>>> view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
No, you tried and failed. You're losing your squeak. I need a new kick toy. So
why is Rudy and Snit and that other guy arguing about you? You hate all of
them.
Nope.
I have proven what I say on numerous occasions.
Very few.
So you admit I do prove what I say.
Got it.
I never admitted that. You are trying to twist shit around again.
And I don't hate ANY of them.
You do.
Nope.
You said so.
Yet here YOU are, Cupcake!How is declaring you not important enough to hate in any way bragging?
None of you are important enough to hate.
Uh huh. Bragging again?
Yet here you are.
On 2026-07-25 07:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414pb$14htd$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1141105$1383u$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
So? Fag game. But you don't. Did you get benched in shinny too?
On 2026-07-24 17:41, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ue0$13147$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>You know nothing about me...
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kid$10d8d$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 06:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upve$dsbp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113uk30$c9ld$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 10:48 PM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way? Why is meeting people online so >>>>>>>>>>>> different from real life? Try lightening up.
Because I would have slapped you silly in real life.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Whatever you need to believe, Cupcake!
We all know it's true. Your nervous laughter shows it.
How does one get "nervous" from text, Cupcake?
You show it just before you raise that flag.
Is that right?
I was laughing at the idea that you could "slap[] me silly in real >>>>>> life", Cupcake.
You're old. I'm not young, but I'm actually fit.
Yea sure. You know nothing about me little fella. But you Canadians are a lot
braver behind a keyboard 1000s of miles away.
...but I'll tell you I play ice hockey 3-5 times a week all winter.
Ice hockey? "Fag game"?
What's your sport, Cupcake; assuming you get get out of your wheelchair?
LOL Look at you all upset again. You say the childish things when you're upset.
Really? You think I'm upset?
Based on what?
:-)--
On 2026-07-25 07:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414lm$14htd$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
Oh CRAP!No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provideNot true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background, >>>>>>>>>>>>> looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
a> your age.
a>
a> Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy...
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well.
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
Not your choice. You are like a clown.
I'm rubber, you're glue.
On 2026-07-25 07:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414mj$14htd$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:00, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410ua$1383u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ua9$13147$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it.
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote:I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years?
On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote:You knew what a "company website" was... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Details please
You lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedlyI've never once disparaged you, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impersonate you.400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/
hugh- huntzinger- the- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a
rec.scuba
thread/post:
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once
again", within
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for
the archives of
published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist
Bob Ling's original >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized
versions on webpages >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name
of Hugh (NED)
Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he
actually had the
NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.
This was the ORIGINAL version: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dredging up a necro
thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking
around pulling the same crap but the audience has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not
using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business as "[my] company website".
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website
of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employment from others for your services under your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bakermendia moniker which you claim to own. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person...
..because you had both yourself.
And here is another lie: Look up this:
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial
version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better
impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion...
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020...
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What a surprise. But it's the simple truth.
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what...
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger...
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the
photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on >>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the
current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>>>>>
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
Nope. Utterly false.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link.
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their
dates displayed if you like.
Of course.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
You know I can imagine someone who doesn't lie?
You're right!
Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed.
Run away, Cupcake!
He's begging me to leave so he can claim some false win. What a tryhard you
are.
Hey...you're the one who declared "Thread closed."...
..but still can't let it go.
It's my thread. I do as I please.
Nope.
You don't own it, Cupcake.
And you STILL can't let it go.
On 2026-07-25 07:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414q4$14htd$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:30, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114111h$1383u$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:42, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140uf3$13147$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:18, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kjs$10d8d$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 06:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upvp$dsbp$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ujpg$c78l$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...Nope!
On 2026-07-23 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113ue2e$alss$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...Really?
On 2026-07-23 17:51, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 8:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-23 16:21, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 7/23/2026 7:18 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <113u4n1$7ped$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 6:17 PM, Alan wrote:
When asked to justify your bullshit about Canada (which ranks as a
better country to live than the US on EVERY site that provides such
rankings)...
...you ran.
Skeeter self-pwns like no other, heh.
Alan doesn't like you or me.
I know Alan hates me, but it's OK, I like him despite that.a I'm
concerned, here, with pointing out what a buffoon Skeeter is.
Again. I'd have to actually think about you at all before I could hate
you.
Take a chill pill, sir, debating Apple on Usenet is not the only angle
we might have to interact.a You aren't a bad guy at all, you're
intelligent and good-natured, but we just have differing views of
computer software.
There is no part of me that isn't chill.
Says the guy who stomps his feet when we make him look silly. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Give an example.
Nope.
I just don't spend any time thinking about you.
Because you hate him.
Same as you, Cupcake.
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yes you do.
Oh you do. Your posting shows it.
How is my posting different than yours, Cupcake?
You're obsessed.
You reply to me in sub-threads where you aren't even involved, Cupcake.
It's called usenet. That's how it works. Stick around and you will learn.
But me replying to you when you've replied to me with no prior
involvement...
...somehow that's me being obsessed, Cupcake?
Who's on first, What's on second and I don't know is on third.
Blah Blah
Yeah...
Blather was your best response.
Just responding in kind. I don't want to overwhelm you.
Whatever you need to believe to not hate yourself, Cupcake!
On 2026-07-25 07:36, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414kg$14htd$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:32, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114118d$13evc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ugt$13147$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken
October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/
view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/
view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
No, you tried and failed. You're losing your squeak. I need a new kick toy. So
why is Rudy and Snit and that other guy arguing about you? You hate all of
them.
Nope.
I have proven what I say on numerous occasions.
Very few.
So you admit I do prove what I say.
Got it.
I never admitted that. You are trying to twist shit around again.
Sure you did.
"few" means you admitted I do prove some of the things I say.
And I don't hate ANY of them.
You do.
Nope.
You said so.
Did I? Quote me
How is declaring you not important enough to hate in any way bragging?
None of you are important enough to hate.
Uh huh. Bragging again?
Yet here you are.Yet here YOU are, Cupcake!
In article <114ensi$1f0p7$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414lm$14htd$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
Oh CRAP!No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provideNot true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07-aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
-a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
-a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
-a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
-a> your age.
-a>
-a> Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43-aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03-aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well.
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
Not your choice. You are like a clown.
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
In article <114entj$1f0p7$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414mj$14htd$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:00, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410ua$1383u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ua9$13147$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it.
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote:I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years?
On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote:You knew what a "company website" was... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Details please
You lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedlyI've never once disparaged you, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/
hugh- huntzinger- the- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a
rec.scuba
thread/post:
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once
again", within
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for
the archives of
published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist
Bob Ling's original >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized
versions on webpages >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name
of Hugh (NED)
Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he
actually had the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.
This was the ORIGINAL version: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dredging up a necro >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking
around pulling the same crap but the audience has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not
using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business as "[my] company website". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website
of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employment from others for your services under your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bakermendia moniker which you claim to own. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person...
..because you had both yourself.
And here is another lie: Look up this:
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial
version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better
impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion...
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020...
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What a surprise. But it's the simple truth.
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what...
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger...
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the
photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the
current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
Nope. Utterly false.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link.
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>>>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their
dates displayed if you like.
Of course.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
You know I can imagine someone who doesn't lie?
You're right!
Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed. >>>>>>>
Run away, Cupcake!
He's begging me to leave so he can claim some false win. What a tryhard you
are.
Hey...you're the one who declared "Thread closed."...
..but still can't let it go.
It's my thread. I do as I please.
Nope.
You don't own it, Cupcake.
I do own it and that's obvious.
Whatever.
And you STILL can't let it go.
My thread.
In article <114enun$1f0p7$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414pb$14htd$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
LOL Look at you all upset again. You say the childish things when you're >>> upset.
On 2026-07-24 18:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1141105$1383u$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:41, Skeeter wrote:So? Fag game. But you don't. Did you get benched in shinny too?
In article <1140ue0$13147$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>You know nothing about me...
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kid$10d8d$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 06:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upve$dsbp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113uk30$c9ld$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 10:48 PM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way? Why is meeting people online so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> different from real life? Try lightening up.
Because I would have slapped you silly in real life. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Whatever you need to believe, Cupcake!
We all know it's true. Your nervous laughter shows it.
How does one get "nervous" from text, Cupcake?
You show it just before you raise that flag.
Is that right?
I was laughing at the idea that you could "slap[] me silly in real >>>>>>>> life", Cupcake.
You're old. I'm not young, but I'm actually fit.
Yea sure. You know nothing about me little fella. But you Canadians are a lot
braver behind a keyboard 1000s of miles away.
...but I'll tell you I play ice hockey 3-5 times a week all winter. >>>>>>
Ice hockey? "Fag game"?
What's your sport, Cupcake; assuming you get get out of your wheelchair? >>>
Nothing has happened, Cupcake.Really? You think I'm upset?
Based on what?
Your posting shows it. In another day you will run away and lick your wounds and return like nothing happened.
In article <114eo2g$1f0p7$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:36, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414kg$14htd$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:32, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114118d$13evc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ugt$13147$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the >>>>>>>>>>>>> same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken
October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/
view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/
view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
No, you tried and failed. You're losing your squeak. I need a new kick toy. So
why is Rudy and Snit and that other guy arguing about you? You hate all of
them.
Nope.
I have proven what I say on numerous occasions.
Very few.
So you admit I do prove what I say.
Got it.
I never admitted that. You are trying to twist shit around again.
Sure you did.
"few" means you admitted I do prove some of the things I say.
Like a good well trained liberal you agree you can ignore most things as long as you can prove a few.
And I don't hate ANY of them.
You do.
Nope.
You said so.
Did I? Quote me
Why? You said it and you know it.
Yet here you are.
Yet here YOU are, Cupcake!Yet here you are.How is declaring you not important enough to hate in any way bragging? >>>
None of you are important enough to hate.
Uh huh. Bragging again?
My thread.
On 2026-07-30 08:05, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114entj$1f0p7$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414mj$14htd$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:00, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410ua$1383u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ua9$13147$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it.
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote:I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years?
On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote:
You knew what a "company website" was... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Details pleaseYou lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedlyI've never once disparaged you, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck
impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/
hugh- huntzinger- the- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a
rec.scuba
thread/post:
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once
again", within >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for
the archives of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist
Bob Ling's original >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized
versions on webpages >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name
of Hugh (NED)
Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he
actually had the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spirit.
This was the ORIGINAL version: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dredging up a necro >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking
around pulling the same crap but the audience has
shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not
using the NED moniker these days. His sig is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply HH.
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business as "[my] company website". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website
of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employment from others for your services under your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bakermendia moniker which you claim to own. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person...
..because you had both yourself.
And here is another lie: Look up this: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial
version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better
impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion...
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020...
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What a surprise. But it's the simple truth.
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger...
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the
photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the
current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Liarboy.
Nope. Utterly false.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link.
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their
dates displayed if you like.
Of course.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
You know I can imagine someone who doesn't lie?
You're right!
Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed. >>>>>>>>
Run away, Cupcake!
He's begging me to leave so he can claim some false win. What a tryhard you
are.
Hey...you're the one who declared "Thread closed."...
..but still can't let it go.
It's my thread. I do as I please.
Nope.
You don't own it, Cupcake.
I do own it and that's obvious.
It's obvious you don't know how Usenet works, you mean.
Whatever.
And you STILL can't let it go.
My thread.
You can't live up to your own words:
"Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed."
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
On 2026-07-30 07:00, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114enun$1f0p7$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414pb$14htd$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
LOL Look at you all upset again. You say the childish things when you're >>> upset.
On 2026-07-24 18:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1141105$1383u$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:41, Skeeter wrote:So? Fag game. But you don't. Did you get benched in shinny too?
In article <1140ue0$13147$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>You know nothing about me...
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kid$10d8d$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 06:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113upve$dsbp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-23 20:21, Skeeter wrote:
In article <113uk30$c9ld$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/23/2026 10:48 PM, Alan wrote:
I reply on these groups because it's fun, but outside that, I don't give
two straws about you.
:-)
Yeah, but why are you that way? Why is meeting people online so
different from real life? Try lightening up.
Because I would have slapped you silly in real life. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Whatever you need to believe, Cupcake!
We all know it's true. Your nervous laughter shows it. >>>>>>>>>>>
How does one get "nervous" from text, Cupcake?
You show it just before you raise that flag.
Is that right?
I was laughing at the idea that you could "slap[] me silly in real >>>>>>>> life", Cupcake.
You're old. I'm not young, but I'm actually fit.
Yea sure. You know nothing about me little fella. But you Canadians are a lot
braver behind a keyboard 1000s of miles away.
...but I'll tell you I play ice hockey 3-5 times a week all winter. >>>>>>
Ice hockey? "Fag game"?
What's your sport, Cupcake; assuming you get get out of your wheelchair? >>>
Really? You think I'm upset?
Based on what?
Your posting shows it. In another day you will run away and lick your wounds
and return like nothing happened.
Nothing has happened, Cupcake.
You are nothing.
A very mildly amusing nothing.
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114ensi$1f0p7$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414lm$14htd$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
Oh CRAP!No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provideNot true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
a> your age.
a>
a> Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
Not your choice. You are like a clown.
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter: You are one dumb bastard.
On 2026-07-30 08:05, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114entj$1f0p7$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414mj$14htd$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:00, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410ua$1383u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ua9$13147$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it.
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote:I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years?
On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote:
You knew what a "company website" was... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Details pleaseYou lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person asI've never once disparaged you, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck
impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/
hugh- huntzinger- the- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a
rec.scuba
thread/post:
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once
again", within >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for
the archives of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist
Bob Ling's original >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized
versions on webpages >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name
of Hugh (NED)
Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he
actually had the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.
This was the ORIGINAL version: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about
dredging up a necro >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking
around pulling the same crap but the audience has
shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not
using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly
for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business as "[my] company website". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website
of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employment from others for your services under your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bakermendia moniker which you claim to own. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person...
..because you had both yourself.
And here is another lie: Look up this: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial
version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better
impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion...
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020...
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What a surprise. But it's the simple truth.
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger...
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the
photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the
current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
Nope. Utterly false.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link.
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their
dates displayed if you like.
Of course.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
You know I can imagine someone who doesn't lie?
You're right!
Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed. >>>>>>>
Run away, Cupcake!
He's begging me to leave so he can claim some false win. What a tryhard you
are.
Hey...you're the one who declared "Thread closed."...
..but still can't let it go.
It's my thread. I do as I please.
Nope.
You don't own it, Cupcake.
I do own it and that's obvious.
It's obvious you don't know how Usenet works, you mean.
And you STILL can't let it go.
My thread.Whatever.
You can't live up to your own words:
"Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed."
On 7/30/2026 12:03 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:05, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114entj$1f0p7$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414mj$14htd$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>
On 2026-07-24 18:00, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410ua$1383u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ua9$13147$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it.
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote:I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years?
On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You knew what a "company website" was... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Details pleaseYou lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person asScooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck
impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/
hugh- huntzinger- the- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a
rec.scuba
thread/post: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once
again", within >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for
the archives of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist
Bob Ling's original >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized
versions on webpages >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name
of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he
actually had the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED
spirit.
This was the ORIGINAL version: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about
dredging up a necro >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking
around pulling the same crap but the audience has
shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not
using the NED moniker these days. His sig is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply HH.
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep.
I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly
for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business as "[my] company website". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website
of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employment from others for your services under your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bakermendia moniker which you claim to own. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a
person...
..because you had both yourself.
And here is another lie: Look up this: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial
version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better
impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion...
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020...
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What a surprise. But it's the simple truth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger...
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the
photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the
current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links,
Liarboy.
Nope. Utterly false.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link.
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their
dates displayed if you like.
Of course.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
You know I can imagine someone who doesn't lie?
You're right!
Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed. >>>>>>>>
Run away, Cupcake!
He's begging me to leave so he can claim some false win. What a tryhard you
are.
Hey...you're the one who declared "Thread closed."...
..but still can't let it go.
It's my thread. I do as I please.
Nope.
You don't own it, Cupcake.
I do own it and that's obvious.
It's obvious you don't know how Usenet works, you mean.
Whatever.
And you STILL can't let it go.
My thread.
You can't live up to your own words:
"Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed."
You seem to have a pretty good understanding of Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell. Do you know how he crippled himself?
On 2026-07-30 08:08, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114eo2g$1f0p7$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:36, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414kg$14htd$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:32, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114118d$13evc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ugt$13147$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken
October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/
view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/
view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
No, you tried and failed. You're losing your squeak. I need a new kick toy. So
why is Rudy and Snit and that other guy arguing about you? You hate all of
them.
Nope.
I have proven what I say on numerous occasions.
Very few.
So you admit I do prove what I say.
Got it.
I never admitted that. You are trying to twist shit around again.
Sure you did.
"few" means you admitted I do prove some of the things I say.
Like a good well trained liberal you agree you can ignore most things as long
as you can prove a few.
And I don't hate ANY of them.
You do.
Nope.
You said so.
Did I? Quote me
Why? You said it and you know it.
Nope.
I have never once said that I hated anyone.
And YOU know it.
Yet here YOU are, Cupcake!Yet here you are.How is declaring you not important enough to hate in any way bragging? >>>
None of you are important enough to hate.
Uh huh. Bragging again?
My thread.Yet here you are.
In article <114g7ne$22h0j$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter: You are one dumb bastard.
Because I smack you and Alan around all the time? Alan already said he doesn't
like you.
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g7ne$22h0j$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter:-a You are one dumb bastard.
Because I smack you and Alan around all the time? Alan already said he
doesn't
like you.
1. In your dreams, Cupcake.
2. Nope. I never said that.
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g7ne$22h0j$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter: You are one dumb bastard.
Because I smack you and Alan around all the time? Alan already said he doesn't
like you.
1. In your dreams, Cupcake.
2. Nope. I never said that.
On 7/30/2026 4:03 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g7ne$22h0j$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>> On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter:a You are one dumb bastard.
Because I smack you and Alan around all the time? Alan already said he
doesn't
like you.
You might smack me around but I don't see it, because I have your
useless ass killfiled.
1. In your dreams, Cupcake.
2. Nope. I never said that.
;)--
In article <114gan2$23lph$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g7ne$22h0j$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>
On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter: You are one dumb bastard.
Because I smack you and Alan around all the time? Alan already said he doesn't
like you.
1. In your dreams, Cupcake.
2. Nope. I never said that.
You did. Stop humping my posts.
In article <114g718$226ao$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114ensi$1f0p7$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414lm$14htd$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
Oh CRAP!No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provideNot true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07-aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
-a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
-a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
-a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
-a> your age.
-a>
-a> Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43-aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03-aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image...
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
Not your choice. You are like a clown.
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
That isn't childish. That is fact. You will be running again. This we know.
In article <114g75e$226ao$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 08:05, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114entj$1f0p7$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414mj$14htd$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 18:00, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410ua$1383u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ua9$13147$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it.
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote:I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years?
On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You knew what a "company website" was... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Details pleaseYou lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person asI've never once disparaged you, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck
impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/
hugh- huntzinger- the- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a
rec.scuba
thread/post: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once
again", within >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for
the archives of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist
Bob Ling's original >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized
versions on webpages >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name
of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he
actually had the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.
This was the ORIGINAL version: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about
dredging up a necro >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking
around pulling the same crap but the audience has
shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not
using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly
for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business as "[my] company website". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website
of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employment from others for your services under your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bakermendia moniker which you claim to own. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person...
..because you had both yourself.
And here is another lie: Look up this: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial
version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better
impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion...
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020...
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What a surprise. But it's the simple truth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger...
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the
photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the
current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
Nope. Utterly false.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link.
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their
dates displayed if you like.
Of course.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
You know I can imagine someone who doesn't lie?
You're right!
Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed. >>>>>>>>>
Run away, Cupcake!
He's begging me to leave so he can claim some false win. What a tryhard you
are.
Hey...you're the one who declared "Thread closed."...
..but still can't let it go.
It's my thread. I do as I please.
Nope.
You don't own it, Cupcake.
I do own it and that's obvious.
It's obvious you don't know how Usenet works, you mean.
I know more about it than you will ever know.
Nope.Whatever.
And you STILL can't let it go.
My thread.
You better believe it.
You can't live up to your own words:
"Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed."
My thread. I leave it up to you to change the topic. You do it all the time.
In article <114g78o$226ao$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 08:08, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114eo2g$1f0p7$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:36, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414kg$14htd$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 18:32, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114118d$13evc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ugt$13147$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
This photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken
October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/
view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/
view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
No, you tried and failed. You're losing your squeak. I need a new kick toy. So
why is Rudy and Snit and that other guy arguing about you? You hate all of
them.
Nope.
I have proven what I say on numerous occasions.
Very few.
So you admit I do prove what I say.
Got it.
I never admitted that. You are trying to twist shit around again.
Sure you did.
"few" means you admitted I do prove some of the things I say.
Like a good well trained liberal you agree you can ignore most things as long
as you can prove a few.
And I don't hate ANY of them.
You do.
Nope.
You said so.
Did I? Quote me
Why? You said it and you know it.
Nope.
I have never once said that I hated anyone.
And YOU know it.
Yes you have and Snit even called you out.
Yet here you are.
Yet here YOU are, Cupcake!Yet here you are.How is declaring you not important enough to hate in any way bragging? >>>>>
None of you are important enough to hate.
Uh huh. Bragging again?
My thread.
What part of "my thread" don't you get? Is Canadian schooling really that bad?
On 2026-07-30 12:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g78o$226ao$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 08:08, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114eo2g$1f0p7$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:36, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414kg$14htd$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 18:32, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114118d$13evc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ugt$13147$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about theThis photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/
view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/
view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
No, you tried and failed. You're losing your squeak. I need a new kick toy. So
why is Rudy and Snit and that other guy arguing about you? You hate all of
them.
Nope.
I have proven what I say on numerous occasions.
Very few.
So you admit I do prove what I say.
Got it.
I never admitted that. You are trying to twist shit around again.
Sure you did.
"few" means you admitted I do prove some of the things I say.
Like a good well trained liberal you agree you can ignore most things as long
as you can prove a few.
And I don't hate ANY of them.
You do.
Nope.
You said so.
Did I? Quote me
Why? You said it and you know it.
Nope.
I have never once said that I hated anyone.
And YOU know it.
Yes you have and Snit even called you out.
Yet here you are.
Yet here YOU are, Cupcake!How is declaring you not important enough to hate in any way bragging?
None of you are important enough to hate.
Uh huh. Bragging again?
Yet here you are.
My thread.
What part of "my thread" don't you get? Is Canadian schooling really that bad?
What part of you don't own it do you not get?
And Canadian schooling is objectively superior to US schooling.
On 2026-07-30 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114gan2$23lph$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g7ne$22h0j$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>
On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter: You are one dumb bastard.
Because I smack you and Alan around all the time? Alan already said he doesn't
like you.
1. In your dreams, Cupcake.
2. Nope. I never said that.
You did. Stop humping my posts.
Prove something...
...for once.
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g718$226ao$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114ensi$1f0p7$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414lm$14htd$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
Oh CRAP!No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provideNot true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
a> your age.
a>
a> Have a great holiday weekend.
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
Not your choice. You are like a clown.
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
That isn't childish. That is fact. You will be running again. This we know.
You'll be humping my leg until I get bored..
..and then you'll declare that "victory".
On 2026-07-30 12:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g75e$226ao$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 08:05, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114entj$1f0p7$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414mj$14htd$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 18:00, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410ua$1383u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ua9$13147$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it.
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote:I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years?
On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You knew what a "company website" was... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Details pleaseYou lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person asScooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck
impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/
hugh- huntzinger- the- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a
rec.scuba
thread/post: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once
again", within >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for
the archives of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist
Bob Ling's original >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized
versions on webpages >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name
of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he
actually had the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.
This was the ORIGINAL version: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about
dredging up a necro >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking
around pulling the same crap but the audience has
shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not
using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep.
I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly
for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business as "[my] company website". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website
of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employment from others for your services under your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bakermendia moniker which you claim to own. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a
person...
..because you had both yourself.
And here is another lie: Look up this: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial
version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better
impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion...
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020...
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What a surprise. But it's the simple truth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger...
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the
photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the
current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
Nope. Utterly false.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link.
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
dates displayed if you like.
Of course.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
You know I can imagine someone who doesn't lie?
You're right!
Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed. >>>>>>>>>
Run away, Cupcake!
He's begging me to leave so he can claim some false win. What a tryhard you
are.
Hey...you're the one who declared "Thread closed."...
..but still can't let it go.
It's my thread. I do as I please.
Nope.
You don't own it, Cupcake.
I do own it and that's obvious.
It's obvious you don't know how Usenet works, you mean.
I know more about it than you will ever know.
Uhhhhhh...no.
I was at the University of Waterloo while Usenet was being invented.
I literally know the guy who is responsible for the "@" being used in
email addresses.
Whatever.
And you STILL can't let it go.
My thread.
You better believe it.
You can't live up to your own words:
"Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed."
My thread. I leave it up to you to change the topic. You do it all the time.Nope.
Threads aren't owned by anyone, Cupcake.\
On 2026-07-30 12:39, Skeeter wrote:
What part of "my thread" don't you get? Is Canadian schooling really
that bad?
What part of you don't own it do you not get?
And Canadian schooling is objectively superior to US schooling.
On 8/1/2026 12:46 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 12:39, Skeeter wrote:
What part of "my thread" don't you get? Is Canadian schooling really
that bad?
What part of you don't own it do you not get?
And Canadian schooling is objectively superior to US schooling.
Heh, if Skeeter doesn't prove that, I mean ...
On 8/1/2026 12:46 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 12:39, Skeeter wrote:
What part of "my thread" don't you get? Is Canadian schooling really
that bad?
What part of you don't own it do you not get?
And Canadian schooling is objectively superior to US schooling.
Heh, if Skeeter doesn't prove that, I mean ...
In article <114l6vo$3of0t$2@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 8/1/2026 12:46 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 12:39, Skeeter wrote:
What part of "my thread" don't you get? Is Canadian schooling really
that bad?
What part of you don't own it do you not get?
And Canadian schooling is objectively superior to US schooling.
Heh, if Skeeter doesn't prove that, I mean ...
You suck and you blow.
On 8/1/2026 1:33 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
In article <114l6vo$3of0t$2@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 8/1/2026 12:46 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 12:39, Skeeter wrote:
What part of "my thread" don't you get? Is Canadian schooling really >>>> that bad?
What part of you don't own it do you not get?
And Canadian schooling is objectively superior to US schooling.
Heh, if Skeeter doesn't prove that, I mean ...
You suck and you blow.
My GF does have a penis, yes.
You suck and you blow.
My GF does have a penis, yes.
Girls don't have dicks. You are a faggot. You suck and you blow.
On 8/1/2026 2:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
You suck and you blow.
My GF does have a penis, yes.
Girls don't have dicks. You are a faggot. You suck and you blow.
You don't have a brain.
You suck and you blow.
My GF does have a penis, yes.
Girls don't have dicks. You are a faggot. You suck and you blow.
You don't have a brain.
You suck and you blow. You and your girlfriend are faggots. Nothing to be proud
of.
In article <114jthe$3aeu9$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114gan2$23lph$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g7ne$22h0j$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>>>
On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter: You are one dumb bastard.
Because I smack you and Alan around all the time? Alan already said he doesn't
like you.
1. In your dreams, Cupcake.
2. Nope. I never said that.
You did. Stop humping my posts.
Prove something...
...for once.
You are far behind in that. Catch up and then maybe you can make demands.
In article <114jtig$3aeu9$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g718$226ao$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114ensi$1f0p7$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-25 07:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414lm$14htd$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
Oh CRAP!No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provideNot true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07-aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
-a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
-a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
-a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
-a> your age.
-a>
-a> Have a great holiday weekend. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43-aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03-aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
Not your choice. You are like a clown.
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
That isn't childish. That is fact. You will be running again. This we know. >>>
You'll be humping my leg until I get bored..
..and then you'll declare that "victory".
I won't be running like you do. I like that you copy my material.
In article <114jtl4$3aeu9$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 12:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g75e$226ao$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 08:05, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114entj$1f0p7$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-25 07:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414mj$14htd$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 18:00, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410ua$1383u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ua9$13147$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:Of course.
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years?
And here is another lie: Look up this: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You knew what a "company website" was... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Details pleaseYou lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person asScooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck
impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/
hugh- huntzinger- the- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a
rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread/post: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once
again", within >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for
the archives of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist
Bob Ling's original >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized
versions on webpages >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name
of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he
actually had the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.
This was the ORIGINAL version: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
this Hugh
Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about
dredging up a necro >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking
around pulling the same crap but the audience has
shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not
using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep.
I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly
for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business as "[my] company website". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website
of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employment from others for your services under your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bakermendia moniker which you claim to own. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a
person...
..because you had both yourself. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial
version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better
impression for purposes at hand.
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion...
...(a novelty for you, I know)...
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020...
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What a surprise. But it's the simple truth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger...
...so you could call it a kind of lie.
I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the
photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the
current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
Nope. Utterly false.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
dates displayed if you like.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
You know I can imagine someone who doesn't lie?
You're right!
Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed. >>>>>>>>>>>
Run away, Cupcake!
He's begging me to leave so he can claim some false win. What a tryhard you
are.
Hey...you're the one who declared "Thread closed."...
..but still can't let it go.
It's my thread. I do as I please.
Nope.
You don't own it, Cupcake.
I do own it and that's obvious.
It's obvious you don't know how Usenet works, you mean.
I know more about it than you will ever know.
Uhhhhhh...no.
I was at the University of Waterloo while Usenet was being invented.
Bullshit.
I literally know the guy who is responsible for the "@" being used in
email addresses.
Bullshit.
Nope.
Nope.Whatever.
And you STILL can't let it go.
My thread.
You better believe it.
You can't live up to your own words:
"Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed."
My thread. I leave it up to you to change the topic. You do it all the time.
Threads aren't owned by anyone, Cupcake.\
I own this one.
On 2026-08-01 07:36, Skeeter wrote:
I was at the University of Waterloo while Usenet was being invented.
Bullshit.
Wrong. UofW 1980-81.
I literally know the guy who is responsible for the "@" being used in
email addresses.
Bullshit.
Nope. Brad Templeton.
Look it up.
On 8/1/2026 3:40 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
You suck and you blow.
My GF does have a penis, yes.
Girls don't have dicks. You are a faggot. You suck and you blow.
You don't have a brain.
You suck and you blow. You and your girlfriend are faggots. Nothing to be proud
of.
Why do you care about other people's sexuality?
On 2026-08-01 07:34, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jthe$3aeu9$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114gan2$23lph$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g7ne$22h0j$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>>>
On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter: You are one dumb bastard.
Because I smack you and Alan around all the time? Alan already said he doesn't
like you.
1. In your dreams, Cupcake.
2. Nope. I never said that.
You did. Stop humping my posts.
Prove something...
...for once.
You are far behind in that. Catch up and then maybe you can make demands.
Nope.
I've provided far more proofs than you ever have.
On 2026-08-01 07:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jtig$3aeu9$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g718$226ao$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114ensi$1f0p7$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-25 07:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414lm$14htd$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
Oh CRAP!No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provideNot true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
a> your age.
a>
a> Have a great holiday weekend. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...until he dreams up a new "theory".
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
Not your choice. You are like a clown.
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
That isn't childish. That is fact. You will be running again. This we know.
You'll be humping my leg until I get bored..
..and then you'll declare that "victory".
I won't be running like you do. I like that you copy my material.
Like you copy mine?
On 2026-08-01 07:36, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jtl4$3aeu9$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 12:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g75e$226ao$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 08:05, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114entj$1f0p7$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-25 07:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414mj$14htd$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 18:00, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410ua$1383u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ua9$13147$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:Of course.
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote:I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the
On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years?
Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion...And here is another lie: Look up this: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You knew what a "company website" was... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Details pleaseYou lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person asScooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck
impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/
hugh- huntzinger- the- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a
rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread/post: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once
again", within >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for
the archives of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist
Bob Ling's original >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized
versions on webpages >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name
of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he
actually had the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.
This was the ORIGINAL version: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
this Hugh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about
dredging up a necro >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread.
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking
around pulling the same crap but the audience has
shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not
using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep.
I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly
for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my
business as "[my] company website". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website
of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company.
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig
employment from others for your services under your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bakermendia moniker which you claim to own. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a
person...
..because you had both yourself. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial
version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better
impression for purposes at hand. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...(a novelty for you, I know)... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020...
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What a surprise. But it's the simple truth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger...
...so you could call it a kind of lie. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on
LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the
current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
Nope. Utterly false.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
dates displayed if you like.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
You know I can imagine someone who doesn't lie?
You're right!
Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed. >>>>>>>>>>>
Run away, Cupcake!
He's begging me to leave so he can claim some false win. What a tryhard you
are.
Hey...you're the one who declared "Thread closed."...
..but still can't let it go.
It's my thread. I do as I please.
Nope.
You don't own it, Cupcake.
I do own it and that's obvious.
It's obvious you don't know how Usenet works, you mean.
I know more about it than you will ever know.
Uhhhhhh...no.
I was at the University of Waterloo while Usenet was being invented.
Bullshit.
Wrong. UofW 1980-81.
I literally know the guy who is responsible for the "@" being used in
email addresses.
Bullshit.
Nope. Brad Templeton.
Look it up.
Nope.Whatever.
And you STILL can't let it go.
My thread.
You better believe it.
You can't live up to your own words:
"Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed."
My thread. I leave it up to you to change the topic. You do it all the time.
Threads aren't owned by anyone, Cupcake.\
I own this one.Nope.
On 8/1/2026 3:50 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-08-01 07:36, Skeeter wrote:
I was at the University of Waterloo while Usenet was being invented.
Bullshit.
Wrong. UofW 1980-81.
I literally know the guy who is responsible for the "@" being used in
email addresses.
Bullshit.
Nope. Brad Templeton.
Look it up.
All this and you spend good money on Apple's borked Unix implementation.
Why not just use Linux?
You suck and you blow.
My GF does have a penis, yes.
Girls don't have dicks. You are a faggot. You suck and you blow.
You don't have a brain.
You suck and you blow. You and your girlfriend are faggots. Nothing to be proud
of.
Why do you care about other people's sexuality?
Why do you suck fag dick? Even Swill doesn't like you and he's a pussy.
On 8/1/2026 4:39 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
You suck and you blow.
My GF does have a penis, yes.
Girls don't have dicks. You are a faggot. You suck and you blow.
You don't have a brain.
You suck and you blow. You and your girlfriend are faggots. Nothing to be proud
of.
Why do you care about other people's sexuality?
Why do you suck fag dick? Even Swill doesn't like you and he's a pussy.
What is your deal, dude? What century are you in?
Why do you care about other people's sexuality?
Why do you suck fag dick? Even Swill doesn't like you and he's a pussy.
What is your deal, dude? What century are you in?
Just stop being an idiot. Alan and Swill both are tired of you faggy ass shit for brains.
In article <114lij9$3stab$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 07:34, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jthe$3aeu9$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114gan2$23lph$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g7ne$22h0j$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter: You are one dumb bastard.
Because I smack you and Alan around all the time? Alan already said he doesn't
like you.
1. In your dreams, Cupcake.
2. Nope. I never said that.
You did. Stop humping my posts.
Prove something...
...for once.
You are far behind in that. Catch up and then maybe you can make demands. >>>
Nope.
I've provided far more proofs than you ever have.
Nope. You run away or twist the subject around. We saw through your game a long
time ago.
In article <114lijq$3stab$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 07:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jtig$3aeu9$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g718$226ao$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114ensi$1f0p7$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-25 07:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414lm$14htd$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote:The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
Oh CRAP!one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07-aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
portrays a successful professional.
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words?
Post #2
-a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
-a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
-a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
-a> your age.
-a>
-a> Have a great holiday weekend. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43-aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03-aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...until he dreams up a new "theory". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
Not your choice. You are like a clown.
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
That isn't childish. That is fact. You will be running again. This we know.
You'll be humping my leg until I get bored..
..and then you'll declare that "victory".
I won't be running like you do. I like that you copy my material.
Like you copy mine?
Show me an instance where I ever did that cupcake.
In article <114liln$3stab$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 07:36, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jtl4$3aeu9$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 12:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g75e$226ao$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 08:05, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114entj$1f0p7$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-25 07:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414mj$14htd$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 18:00, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410ua$1383u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ua9$13147$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:Of course.
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the
I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years?Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion...And here is another lie: Look up this: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You knew what a "company website" was... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Details pleaseYou lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person asScooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck
impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/
hugh- huntzinger- the- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a
rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread/post: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once
again", within >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for
the archives of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist
Bob Ling's original >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized
versions on webpages >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name
of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he
actually had the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.
This was the ORIGINAL version: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
this Hugh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about
dredging up a necro >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking
around pulling the same crap but the audience has
shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not
using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep.
I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly
for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my
business as "[my] company website". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website
of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company.
Want more?
I can go on ALL month.
To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gig
employment from others for your services under your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bakermendia moniker which you claim to own. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a
person...
..because you had both yourself. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial
version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better
impression for purposes at hand. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...(a novelty for you, I know)... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020...
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What a surprise. But it's the simple truth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger...
...so you could call it a kind of lie. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on
LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the
current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
Nope. Utterly false.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
dates displayed if you like.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
You know I can imagine someone who doesn't lie?
You're right!
Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Run away, Cupcake!
He's begging me to leave so he can claim some false win. What a tryhard you
are.
Hey...you're the one who declared "Thread closed."...
..but still can't let it go.
It's my thread. I do as I please.
Nope.
You don't own it, Cupcake.
I do own it and that's obvious.
It's obvious you don't know how Usenet works, you mean.
I know more about it than you will ever know.
Uhhhhhh...no.
I was at the University of Waterloo while Usenet was being invented.
Bullshit.
Wrong. UofW 1980-81.
Bullshit.
Why?
I literally know the guy who is responsible for the "@" being used in
email addresses.
Bullshit.
Nope. Brad Templeton.
Look it up.
And how could you prevent me, Cupcake?Nope.
Nope.Whatever.
And you STILL can't let it go.
My thread.
You better believe it.
You can't live up to your own words:
"Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed."
My thread. I leave it up to you to change the topic. You do it all the time.
Threads aren't owned by anyone, Cupcake.\
I own this one.
I do and you're lucky I allow you to remain.
In article <114jtmi$3aeu9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 12:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g78o$226ao$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 08:08, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114eo2g$1f0p7$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-25 07:36, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414kg$14htd$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>Sure you did.
On 2026-07-24 18:32, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114118d$13evc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ugt$13147$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about theThis photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/
view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/
view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
No, you tried and failed. You're losing your squeak. I need a new kick toy. So
why is Rudy and Snit and that other guy arguing about you? You hate all of
them.
Nope.
I have proven what I say on numerous occasions.
Very few.
So you admit I do prove what I say.
Got it.
I never admitted that. You are trying to twist shit around again. >>>>>>
"few" means you admitted I do prove some of the things I say.
Like a good well trained liberal you agree you can ignore most things as long
as you can prove a few.
And I don't hate ANY of them.
You do.
Nope.
You said so.
Did I? Quote me
Why? You said it and you know it.
Nope.
I have never once said that I hated anyone.
And YOU know it.
Yes you have and Snit even called you out.
Yet here you are.
Yet here YOU are, Cupcake!How is declaring you not important enough to hate in any way bragging?
None of you are important enough to hate.
Uh huh. Bragging again?
Yet here you are.
My thread.
What part of "my thread" don't you get? Is Canadian schooling really that bad?
What part of you don't own it do you not get?
I am looking right at it and it's mine do do with what I please.
And Canadian schooling is objectively superior to US schooling.
Proof? Didn't think so.
On 8/1/2026 4:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
What is your deal, dude? What century are you in?Why do you care about other people's sexuality?
Why do you suck fag dick? Even Swill doesn't like you and he's a pussy. >>
Just stop being an idiot. Alan and Swill both are tired of you faggy ass shit
for brains.
I think it's you who has shit for brains, sir.
On 2026-08-01 07:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jtmi$3aeu9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 12:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g78o$226ao$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 08:08, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114eo2g$1f0p7$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-25 07:36, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414kg$14htd$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>Sure you did.
On 2026-07-24 18:32, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114118d$13evc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ugt$13147$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about theThis photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/
view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/
view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
No, you tried and failed. You're losing your squeak. I need a new kick toy. So
why is Rudy and Snit and that other guy arguing about you? You hate all of
them.
Nope.
I have proven what I say on numerous occasions.
Very few.
So you admit I do prove what I say.
Got it.
I never admitted that. You are trying to twist shit around again. >>>>>>
"few" means you admitted I do prove some of the things I say.
Like a good well trained liberal you agree you can ignore most things as long
as you can prove a few.
And I don't hate ANY of them.
You do.
Nope.
You said so.
Did I? Quote me
Why? You said it and you know it.
Nope.
I have never once said that I hated anyone.
And YOU know it.
Yes you have and Snit even called you out.
Yet here you are.
Yet here YOU are, Cupcake!How is declaring you not important enough to hate in any way bragging?
None of you are important enough to hate.
Uh huh. Bragging again?
Yet here you are.
My thread.
What part of "my thread" don't you get? Is Canadian schooling really that bad?
What part of you don't own it do you not get?
I am looking right at it and it's mine do do with what I please.
And Canadian schooling is objectively superior to US schooling.
Proof? Didn't think so.
<https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/education-rankings-by-country>
On 2026-08-01 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lij9$3stab$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 07:34, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jthe$3aeu9$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114gan2$23lph$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g7ne$22h0j$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter: You are one dumb bastard.
Because I smack you and Alan around all the time? Alan already said he doesn't
like you.
1. In your dreams, Cupcake.
2. Nope. I never said that.
You did. Stop humping my posts.
Prove something...
...for once.
You are far behind in that. Catch up and then maybe you can make demands. >>>
Nope.
I've provided far more proofs than you ever have.
Nope. You run away or twist the subject around. We saw through your game a long
time ago.
Yup.
To my recollection, you've only ever support a claim of your ONCE.
What is your deal, dude? What century are you in?Why do you care about other people's sexuality?
Why do you suck fag dick? Even Swill doesn't like you and he's a pussy. >>>>
Just stop being an idiot. Alan and Swill both are tired of you faggy ass shit
for brains.
I think it's you who has shit for brains, sir.
Don't assume my gender faggot.
On 2026-08-01 13:41, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lijq$3stab$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 07:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jtig$3aeu9$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g718$226ao$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114ensi$1f0p7$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-25 07:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414lm$14htd$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provideThe fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
Oh CRAP!one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
portrays a successful professional. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #2
a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
a> your age.
a>
a> Have a great holiday weekend. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...until he dreams up a new "theory". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
Not your choice. You are like a clown.
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
That isn't childish. That is fact. You will be running again. This we know.
You'll be humping my leg until I get bored..
..and then you'll declare that "victory".
I won't be running like you do. I like that you copy my material.
Like you copy mine?
Show me an instance where I ever did that cupcake.
You mean other than right there, Cupcake?
Or when you started calling me "buttercup", Cupcake?
:-)
In article <114lovb$3v0iq$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 07:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jtmi$3aeu9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 12:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g78o$226ao$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 08:08, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114eo2g$1f0p7$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-25 07:36, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414kg$14htd$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>Sure you did.
On 2026-07-24 18:32, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114118d$13evc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 17:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ugt$13147$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about theThis photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/
view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/
view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
No, you tried and failed. You're losing your squeak. I need a new kick toy. So
why is Rudy and Snit and that other guy arguing about you? You hate all of
them.
Nope.
I have proven what I say on numerous occasions.
Very few.
So you admit I do prove what I say.
Got it.
I never admitted that. You are trying to twist shit around again. >>>>>>>>
"few" means you admitted I do prove some of the things I say.
Like a good well trained liberal you agree you can ignore most things as long
as you can prove a few.
And I don't hate ANY of them.
You do.
Nope.
You said so.
Did I? Quote me
Why? You said it and you know it.
Nope.
I have never once said that I hated anyone.
And YOU know it.
Yes you have and Snit even called you out.
Yet here you are.
Yet here YOU are, Cupcake!How is declaring you not important enough to hate in any way bragging?
None of you are important enough to hate.
Uh huh. Bragging again?
Yet here you are.
My thread.
What part of "my thread" don't you get? Is Canadian schooling really that bad?
What part of you don't own it do you not get?
I am looking right at it and it's mine do do with what I please.
And Canadian schooling is objectively superior to US schooling.
Proof? Didn't think so.
<https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/education-rankings-by-country>
hat's not proof. You are proof they will graduate anyone.
In article <114lomv$3v0iq$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lij9$3stab$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 07:34, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jthe$3aeu9$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114gan2$23lph$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g7ne$22h0j$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter: You are one dumb bastard.
Because I smack you and Alan around all the time? Alan already said he doesn't
like you.
1. In your dreams, Cupcake.
2. Nope. I never said that.
You did. Stop humping my posts.
Prove something...
...for once.
You are far behind in that. Catch up and then maybe you can make demands. >>>>>
Nope.
I've provided far more proofs than you ever have.
Nope. You run away or twist the subject around. We saw through your game a long
time ago.
Yup.
To my recollection, you've only ever support a claim of your ONCE.
I post plenty and I don't run away like you do.
On 2026-08-01 13:42, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114liln$3stab$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 07:36, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jtl4$3aeu9$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 12:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g75e$226ao$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 08:05, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114entj$1f0p7$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-25 07:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414mj$14htd$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 18:00, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410ua$1383u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ua9$13147$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:17, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kft$10d8d$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:Of course.
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:Photo dates can be easily changed. Not buying it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 7/17/26 12:52 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-17 09:45, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/16/26 11:12 AM, Alan wrote:Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
On 2026-07-16 07:11, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/15/26 1:40 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-15 07:14, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/14/26 11:49 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-14 19:36, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/14/26 4:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-14 05:12, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:I know that because as you MIGHT remember I informed you that the
I simply cannot believe that. You changed that much in 2 years?Actually, and introducing actual facts into the discussion...And here is another lie: Look up this: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You knew what a "company website" was... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>To you it's a page, to me it's a site soliciting gigDetails pleaseYou lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as
Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck
impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/
hugh- huntzinger- the- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a
rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread/post: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once
again", within >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"
H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for
the archives of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist
Bob Ling's original >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized
versions on webpages >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name
of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he
actually had the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.
This was the ORIGINAL version: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
this Hugh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about
dredging up a necro >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking
around pulling the same crap but the audience has
shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years ago. He is not
using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.
You disparaging someone...that's irony. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep.
I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Truth is an absolute defence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly
for decades.
Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You lied when you described a LinkedIn page about my
business as "[my] company website". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It was clearly a lie, because you had both a company website
of your own AND a LinkedIn page about your company.
Want more?
I can go on ALL month. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
employment from others for your services under your
bakermendia moniker which you claim to own. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and how it was different than a LinkedIn page about a
person...
..because you had both yourself. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-baker-b970127/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Are those even the same person? If so your Digital Financial
version is a much younger Alan Baker intended to make a better
impression for purposes at hand. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...(a novelty for you, I know)... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...the picture on the DF site was taken on October 26, 2020...
..and the picture on LinkedIn was taken July 13, 2018.
How is using a different photo on two sites a "lie"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What a surprise. But it's the simple truth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And beside the point.
You simply ASSUMED you know what was what... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and then ASSUMED my motive was to make myself look younger...
...so you could call it a kind of lie. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
photo on your Digital Media site was similar to the one on
LinkedIn. You immediately changed the Digital Media photo to the
current version.
No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
Nope. Utterly false.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
That would be five (5) copies of the same link. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
I'll post screenshots of each of them from Photos on my Mac with their
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
dates displayed if you like.
The liar can't imagine someone doesn't lie.
We KNOW you do.
You know I can imagine someone who doesn't lie?
You're right!
Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed.
Run away, Cupcake!
He's begging me to leave so he can claim some false win. What a tryhard you
are.
Hey...you're the one who declared "Thread closed."...
..but still can't let it go.
It's my thread. I do as I please.
Nope.
You don't own it, Cupcake.
I do own it and that's obvious.
It's obvious you don't know how Usenet works, you mean.
I know more about it than you will ever know.
Uhhhhhh...no.
I was at the University of Waterloo while Usenet was being invented.
Bullshit.
Wrong. UofW 1980-81.
Bullshit.
Why?
I literally know the guy who is responsible for the "@" being used in >>>> email addresses.
Bullshit.
Nope. Brad Templeton.
Look it up.
Why are you afraid to.
Brad Templeton
<https://www.templetons.com/brad/>
Nope.
Nope.Whatever.
And you STILL can't let it go.
My thread.
You better believe it.
My thread. I leave it up to you to change the topic. You do it all the time.
You can't live up to your own words:
"Go play yout avoidance word games somewhere else. Thread closed." >>>>>
Threads aren't owned by anyone, Cupcake.\
I own this one.
I do and you're lucky I allow you to remain.
And how could you prevent me, Cupcake?
In article <114loo2$3v0iq$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 13:41, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lijq$3stab$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 07:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jtig$3aeu9$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g718$226ao$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114ensi$1f0p7$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-25 07:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414lm$14htd$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provideThe fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
Oh CRAP!one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07-aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
portrays a successful professional. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #2
-a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
-a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
-a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
-a> your age.
-a>
-a> Have a great holiday weekend. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43-aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03-aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...until he dreams up a new "theory". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast.
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
Not your choice. You are like a clown.
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
That isn't childish. That is fact. You will be running again. This we know.
You'll be humping my leg until I get bored..
..and then you'll declare that "victory".
I won't be running like you do. I like that you copy my material.
Like you copy mine?
Show me an instance where I ever did that cupcake.
You mean other than right there, Cupcake?
Or when you started calling me "buttercup", Cupcake?
:-)
I called you that months ago and you started using it. Nice try though.
On 2026-08-01 14:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lovb$3v0iq$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 07:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jtmi$3aeu9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-30 12:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g78o$226ao$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 08:08, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114eo2g$1f0p7$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-25 07:36, Skeeter wrote:Like a good well trained liberal you agree you can ignore most things as long
In article <11414kg$14htd$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>Sure you did.
On 2026-07-24 18:32, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114118d$13evc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ugt$13147$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about theThis photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/
view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/
view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
No, you tried and failed. You're losing your squeak. I need a new kick toy. So
why is Rudy and Snit and that other guy arguing about you? You hate all of
them.
Nope.
I have proven what I say on numerous occasions.
Very few.
So you admit I do prove what I say.
Got it.
I never admitted that. You are trying to twist shit around again. >>>>>>>>
"few" means you admitted I do prove some of the things I say. >>>>>>>
as you can prove a few.
And I don't hate ANY of them.
You do.
Nope.
You said so.
Did I? Quote me
Why? You said it and you know it.
Nope.
I have never once said that I hated anyone.
And YOU know it.
Yes you have and Snit even called you out.
Yet here you are.
Yet here YOU are, Cupcake!How is declaring you not important enough to hate in any way bragging?
None of you are important enough to hate.
Uh huh. Bragging again?
Yet here you are.
My thread.
What part of "my thread" don't you get? Is Canadian schooling really that bad?
What part of you don't own it do you not get?
I am looking right at it and it's mine do do with what I please.
And Canadian schooling is objectively superior to US schooling.
Proof? Didn't think so.
<https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/education-rankings-by-country>
hat's not proof. You are proof they will graduate anyone.
It's more proof than you have ever provided for anything, Cupcake.
On 2026-08-01 14:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lomv$3v0iq$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lij9$3stab$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 07:34, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jthe$3aeu9$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114gan2$23lph$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g7ne$22h0j$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake? >>>>>>>>>>
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter: You are one dumb bastard.
Because I smack you and Alan around all the time? Alan already said he doesn't
like you.
1. In your dreams, Cupcake.
2. Nope. I never said that.
You did. Stop humping my posts.
Prove something...
...for once.
You are far behind in that. Catch up and then maybe you can make demands.
Nope.
I've provided far more proofs than you ever have.
Nope. You run away or twist the subject around. We saw through your game a long
time ago.
Yup.
To my recollection, you've only ever support a claim of your ONCE.
I post plenty and I don't run away like you do.
Give an example of a claim you've supported.
On 8/1/2026 5:43 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
What is your deal, dude? What century are you in?Why do you care about other people's sexuality?
Why do you suck fag dick? Even Swill doesn't like you and he's a pussy. >>>>
Just stop being an idiot. Alan and Swill both are tired of you faggy ass shit
for brains.
I think it's you who has shit for brains, sir.
Don't assume my gender faggot.
If you're a chick you're an awfully ornery one.
On 2026-08-01 14:49, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114loo2$3v0iq$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 13:41, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lijq$3stab$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 07:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jtig$3aeu9$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g718$226ao$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114ensi$1f0p7$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-25 07:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414lm$14htd$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provideThe fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.
Oh CRAP!one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
portrays a successful professional. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link)
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #2
a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
a> your age.
a>
a> Have a great holiday weekend. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...until he dreams up a new "theory". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
Not your choice. You are like a clown.
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
That isn't childish. That is fact. You will be running again. This we know.
You'll be humping my leg until I get bored..
..and then you'll declare that "victory".
I won't be running like you do. I like that you copy my material.
Like you copy mine?
Show me an instance where I ever did that cupcake.
You mean other than right there, Cupcake?
Or when you started calling me "buttercup", Cupcake?
:-)
I called you that months ago and you started using it. Nice try though.
Nope. You started it quite recently, Cupcake...
...but go ahead and support your claim.
What is your deal, dude? What century are you in?Why do you care about other people's sexuality?
Why do you suck fag dick? Even Swill doesn't like you and he's a pussy. >>>>>>
Just stop being an idiot. Alan and Swill both are tired of you faggy ass shit
for brains.
I think it's you who has shit for brains, sir.
Don't assume my gender faggot.
If you're a chick you're an awfully ornery one.
Not your business. Unlike you I don't share my mental sickness with the world.
So how does your girlfriends dick taste faggot?
On 8/1/2026 5:56 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Why do you care about other people's sexuality?
Why do you suck fag dick? Even Swill doesn't like you and he's a pussy.
What is your deal, dude? What century are you in?
Just stop being an idiot. Alan and Swill both are tired of you faggy ass shit
for brains.
I think it's you who has shit for brains, sir.
Don't assume my gender faggot.
If you're a chick you're an awfully ornery one.
Not your business. Unlike you I don't share my mental sickness with the world.
So how does your girlfriends dick taste faggot?
We haven't had sex yet, she's in another part of the world for now.
On 8/1/2026 5:56 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Why do you care about other people's sexuality?
Why do you suck fag dick? Even Swill doesn't like you and he's >>>>>>>> a pussy.
What is your deal, dude? What century are you in?
Just stop being an idiot. Alan and Swill both are tired of you
faggy ass shit for brains.
I think it's you who has shit for brains, sir.
Don't assume my gender faggot.
If you're a chick you're an awfully ornery one.
Not your business. Unlike you I don't share my mental sickness with
the world. So how does your girlfriends dick taste faggot?
We haven't had sex yet, she's in another part of the world for now.
Why do you care about other people's sexuality?
Why do you suck fag dick? Even Swill doesn't like you and he's a pussy.
What is your deal, dude? What century are you in?
Just stop being an idiot. Alan and Swill both are tired of you faggy ass shit
for brains.
I think it's you who has shit for brains, sir.
Don't assume my gender faggot.
If you're a chick you're an awfully ornery one.
Not your business. Unlike you I don't share my mental sickness with the world.
So how does your girlfriends dick taste faggot?
We haven't had sex yet, she's in another part of the world for now.
Couldn't stand being in the same town with you?
Why do you care about other people's sexuality?
Why do you suck fag dick? Even Swill doesn't like you and he's >>>>>>>>> a pussy.
What is your deal, dude? What century are you in?
Just stop being an idiot. Alan and Swill both are tired of you
faggy ass shit for brains.
I think it's you who has shit for brains, sir.
Don't assume my gender faggot.
If you're a chick you're an awfully ornery one.
Not your business. Unlike you I don't share my mental sickness with
the world. So how does your girlfriends dick taste faggot?
We haven't had sex yet, she's in another part of the world for now.
S U C K E R !
So how much scratch are you sending her so she can take care of her impoverished family?
You do realize that you are being played for a sucker don't you?
It's the oldest scam in the book.
She's probably some middle aged overweight guy with a neck beard.
Oh, and I'm sure she is sending you sexy pictures of herself.
You sound like a real live one Joel.
Have you ever met her in person?
Zoom video doesn't count. Your GF has his friends appear in a zoom call
to suck you in.
Don't be a fool Joel.
All this and you spend good money on Apple's borked Unix implementation.
Why not just use Linux?
On Sat, 1 Aug 2026 16:02:46 -0400, "Joel W. Crump" wrote:
All this and you spend good money on Apple's borked Unix implementation.
Why not just use Linux?
For the same reasons one might drive a Lexus instead of a Corolla.
In article <114lpmo$3v8f3$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 14:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lomv$3v0iq$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lij9$3stab$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-08-01 07:34, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jthe$3aeu9$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114gan2$23lph$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g7ne$22h0j$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake? >>>>>>>>>>>>
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter: You are one dumb bastard.
Because I smack you and Alan around all the time? Alan already said he doesn't
like you.
1. In your dreams, Cupcake.
2. Nope. I never said that.
You did. Stop humping my posts.
Prove something...
...for once.
You are far behind in that. Catch up and then maybe you can make demands.
Nope.
I've provided far more proofs than you ever have.
Nope. You run away or twist the subject around. We saw through your game a long
time ago.
Yup.
To my recollection, you've only ever support a claim of your ONCE.
I post plenty and I don't run away like you do.
Give an example of a claim you've supported.
I don't take orders from you.
In article <114lpoc$3v8f3$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 14:49, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114loo2$3v0iq$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 13:41, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lijq$3stab$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-08-01 07:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jtig$3aeu9$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g718$226ao$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114ensi$1f0p7$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-25 07:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414lm$14htd$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.Oh CRAP!one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07-aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
portrays a successful professional. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link)
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #2
-a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
-a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
-a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
-a> your age.
-a>
-a> Have a great holiday weekend. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43-aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03-aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...until he dreams up a new "theory". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
Not your choice. You are like a clown.
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
That isn't childish. That is fact. You will be running again. This we know.
You'll be humping my leg until I get bored..
..and then you'll declare that "victory".
I won't be running like you do. I like that you copy my material. >>>>>>>
Like you copy mine?
Show me an instance where I ever did that cupcake.
You mean other than right there, Cupcake?
Or when you started calling me "buttercup", Cupcake?
:-)
I called you that months ago and you started using it. Nice try though.
Nope. You started it quite recently, Cupcake...
...but go ahead and support your claim.
I been calling people that for years. Stop being stupid buttercup.
In article <114lpls$3v0iq$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 14:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lovb$3v0iq$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 07:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jtmi$3aeu9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 12:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g78o$226ao$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 08:08, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114eo2g$1f0p7$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-25 07:36, Skeeter wrote:Like a good well trained liberal you agree you can ignore most things as long
In article <11414kg$14htd$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>Sure you did.
On 2026-07-24 18:32, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114118d$13evc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ugt$13147$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote:
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about theThis photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a major
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/
view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/
view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
No, you tried and failed. You're losing your squeak. I need a new kick toy. So
why is Rudy and Snit and that other guy arguing about you? You hate all of
them.
Nope.
I have proven what I say on numerous occasions.
Very few.
So you admit I do prove what I say.
Got it.
I never admitted that. You are trying to twist shit around again. >>>>>>>>>>
"few" means you admitted I do prove some of the things I say. >>>>>>>>>
as you can prove a few.
And I don't hate ANY of them.
You do.
Nope.
You said so.
Did I? Quote me
Why? You said it and you know it.
Nope.
I have never once said that I hated anyone.
And YOU know it.
Yes you have and Snit even called you out.
Yet here you are.
Yet here YOU are, Cupcake!How is declaring you not important enough to hate in any way bragging?
None of you are important enough to hate.
Uh huh. Bragging again?
Yet here you are.
My thread.
What part of "my thread" don't you get? Is Canadian schooling really that bad?
What part of you don't own it do you not get?
I am looking right at it and it's mine do do with what I please.
And Canadian schooling is objectively superior to US schooling.
Proof? Didn't think so.
<https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/education-rankings-by-country>
hat's not proof. You are proof they will graduate anyone.
It's more proof than you have ever provided for anything, Cupcake.
Look at you stomping your feet. You having a bad day?
On Sat, 1 Aug 2026 16:02:46 -0400, "Joel W. Crump" wrote:
All this and you spend good money on Apple's borked Unix implementation.
Why not just use Linux?
For the same reasons one might drive a Lexus instead of a Corolla.
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in >news:114lv03$17lh$1@dont-email.me:you and he's
On 8/1/2026 5:56 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Why do you care about other people's sexuality?
Why do you suck fag dick? Even Swill doesn't like
tired of youa pussy.
What is your deal, dude? What century are you in?
Just stop being an idiot. Alan and Swill both are
sickness withfaggy ass shit for brains.
I think it's you who has shit for brains, sir.
Don't assume my gender faggot.
If you're a chick you're an awfully ornery one.
Not your business. Unlike you I don't share my mental
faggot?the world. So how does your girlfriends dick taste
world for now.
We haven't had sex yet, she's in another part of the
care of her
S U C K E R !
So how much scratch are you sending her so she can take
impoverished family?you?
You do realize that you are being played for a sucker don't
It's the oldest scam in the book.beard.
She's probably some middle aged overweight guy with a neck
Oh, and I'm sure she is sending you sexy pictures ofherself.
You sound like a real live one Joel.a zoom call
Have you ever met her in person?
Zoom video doesn't count. Your GF has his friends appear in
to suck you in.
Don't be a fool Joel.
On 8/1/2026 7:43 PM, Terminus wrote:
Why do you care about other people's sexuality?
Why do you suck fag dick? Even Swill doesn't like you and he's >>>>>>>>> a pussy.
What is your deal, dude? What century are you in?
Just stop being an idiot. Alan and Swill both are tired of you >>>>>>> faggy ass shit for brains.
I think it's you who has shit for brains, sir.
Don't assume my gender faggot.
If you're a chick you're an awfully ornery one.
Not your business. Unlike you I don't share my mental sickness with
the world. So how does your girlfriends dick taste faggot?
We haven't had sex yet, she's in another part of the world for now.
S U C K E R !
So how much scratch are you sending her so she can take care of her impoverished family?
You do realize that you are being played for a sucker don't you?
It's the oldest scam in the book.
She's probably some middle aged overweight guy with a neck beard.
Oh, and I'm sure she is sending you sexy pictures of herself.
You sound like a real live one Joel.
Have you ever met her in person?
Zoom video doesn't count. Your GF has his friends appear in a zoom call
to suck you in.
Don't be a fool Joel.
Racist.
On 2026-08-01 14:54, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lpls$3v0iq$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 14:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lovb$3v0iq$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 07:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jtmi$3aeu9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 12:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g78o$226ao$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 08:08, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114eo2g$1f0p7$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-25 07:36, Skeeter wrote:Like a good well trained liberal you agree you can ignore most things as long
In article <11414kg$14htd$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...Sure you did.
On 2026-07-24 18:32, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114118d$13evc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140ugt$13147$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140klh$10d8d$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:14, Tom Elam wrote:
On 7/21/26 4:40 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-21 05:33, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a majorThis photo (as you can see from the info panel displayed) was taken
illness, mental or physical.
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change into
whatever appearance meets the needs of the day? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
October 26, 2020:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yzkp7pyxcWN8ttb-IeIT6OXfGxjtoDVA/
view? usp=share_link>
While this one was taken 2 years, 3 months earlier on July 13, 2018:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/178lBdZR1O0tKJp3TXcVHDHgs1iHsaecK/
view? usp=sharing>
Unlike you, I don't need to lie.
Oh but you do!
Oh, but I don't.
:-)
But you can't back up any thing.
Oh, but I can.
No, you tried and failed. You're losing your squeak. I need a new kick toy. So
why is Rudy and Snit and that other guy arguing about you? You hate all of
them.
Nope.
I have proven what I say on numerous occasions.
Very few.
So you admit I do prove what I say.
Got it.
I never admitted that. You are trying to twist shit around again. >>>>>>>>>>
"few" means you admitted I do prove some of the things I say. >>>>>>>>>
as you can prove a few.
And I don't hate ANY of them.
You do.
Nope.
You said so.
Did I? Quote me
Why? You said it and you know it.
Nope.
I have never once said that I hated anyone.
And YOU know it.
Yes you have and Snit even called you out.
Yet here you are.
Yet here YOU are, Cupcake!How is declaring you not important enough to hate in any way bragging?
None of you are important enough to hate.
Uh huh. Bragging again?
Yet here you are.
My thread.
What part of "my thread" don't you get? Is Canadian schooling really that bad?
What part of you don't own it do you not get?
I am looking right at it and it's mine do do with what I please.
And Canadian schooling is objectively superior to US schooling.
Proof? Didn't think so.
<https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/education-rankings-by-country>
hat's not proof. You are proof they will graduate anyone.
It's more proof than you have ever provided for anything, Cupcake.
Look at you stomping your feet. You having a bad day?
Not in the slightest.
Pointing out facts is not "stomping [one's] feet".
On 2026-08-01 14:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lpoc$3v8f3$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 14:49, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114loo2$3v0iq$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 13:41, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lijq$3stab$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-08-01 07:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jtig$3aeu9$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g718$226ao$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114ensi$1f0p7$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414lm$14htd$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
Oh CRAP!
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07aAM
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
portrays a successful professional. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link)
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #2
a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
a> your age.
a>
a> Have a great holiday weekend. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43aPM
to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03aPM
to
And now I've set it to the correct image... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...until he dreams up a new "theory". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
Not your choice. You are like a clown.
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake?
That isn't childish. That is fact. You will be running again. This we know.
You'll be humping my leg until I get bored..
..and then you'll declare that "victory".
I won't be running like you do. I like that you copy my material. >>>>>>>
Like you copy mine?
Show me an instance where I ever did that cupcake.
You mean other than right there, Cupcake?
Or when you started calling me "buttercup", Cupcake?
:-)
I called you that months ago and you started using it. Nice try though. >>>
Nope. You started it quite recently, Cupcake...
...but go ahead and support your claim.
I been calling people that for years. Stop being stupid buttercup.
Sure.....
...and yet you cannot produce an example of you calling it me "months ago">
On 2026-08-01 14:54, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lpmo$3v8f3$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 14:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lomv$3v0iq$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lij9$3stab$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-08-01 07:34, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jthe$3aeu9$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114gan2$23lph$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g7ne$22h0j$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake? >>>>>>>>>>>>
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter: You are one dumb bastard.
Because I smack you and Alan around all the time? Alan already said he doesn't
like you.
1. In your dreams, Cupcake.
2. Nope. I never said that.
You did. Stop humping my posts.
Prove something...
...for once.
You are far behind in that. Catch up and then maybe you can make demands.
Nope.
I've provided far more proofs than you ever have.
Nope. You run away or twist the subject around. We saw through your game a long
time ago.
Yup.
To my recollection, you've only ever support a claim of your ONCE.
I post plenty and I don't run away like you do.
Give an example of a claim you've supported.
I don't take orders from you.
No.
You run away.
On 8/1/2026 7:43 PM, Terminus wrote:
Why do you care about other people's sexuality?
Why do you suck fag dick? Even Swill doesn't like you and he's >>>>>>>>> a pussy.
What is your deal, dude? What century are you in?
Just stop being an idiot. Alan and Swill both are tired of you >>>>>>> faggy ass shit for brains.
I think it's you who has shit for brains, sir.
Don't assume my gender faggot.
If you're a chick you're an awfully ornery one.
Not your business. Unlike you I don't share my mental sickness with
the world. So how does your girlfriends dick taste faggot?
We haven't had sex yet, she's in another part of the world for now.
S U C K E R !
So how much scratch are you sending her so she can take care of her impoverished family?
You do realize that you are being played for a sucker don't you?
It's the oldest scam in the book.
She's probably some middle aged overweight guy with a neck beard.
Oh, and I'm sure she is sending you sexy pictures of herself.
You sound like a real live one Joel.
Have you ever met her in person?
Zoom video doesn't count. Your GF has his friends appear in a zoom call
to suck you in.
Don't be a fool Joel.
Racist.
On 8/1/2026 7:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Why do you care about other people's sexuality?
Why do you suck fag dick? Even Swill doesn't like you and he's a pussy.
What is your deal, dude? What century are you in?
Just stop being an idiot. Alan and Swill both are tired of you faggy ass shit
for brains.
I think it's you who has shit for brains, sir.
Don't assume my gender faggot.
If you're a chick you're an awfully ornery one.
Not your business. Unlike you I don't share my mental sickness with the world.
So how does your girlfriends dick taste faggot?
We haven't had sex yet, she's in another part of the world for now.
Couldn't stand being in the same town with you?
You gonna buy me a plane ticket to her country?
Governor Swill wrote:
Joel W. Crump" wrote:
All this and you spend good money on Apple's borked Unix implementation. >>> Why not just use Linux?
For the same reasons one might drive a Lexus instead of a Corolla.
Corolla?
<https://web.stanford.edu/class/cs81n/command.txt>
Governor Swill wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed):
On Sat, 1 Aug 2026 16:02:46 -0400, "Joel W. Crump" wrote:
All this and you spend good money on Apple's borked Unix implementation. >>> Why not just use Linux?
For the same reasons one might drive a Lexus instead of a Corolla.
Corolla?
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
Joel W. Crump" wrote:
All this and you spend good money on Apple's borked Unix implementation. >>>> Why not just use Linux?
For the same reasons one might drive a Lexus instead of a Corolla.
Corolla?
<https://web.stanford.edu/class/cs81n/command.txt>
A better analogy would be automatic vs manual transmission. Some
people want more control.
I have learned much more about Microsoft by using the Linux
operating system than I ever would have done by using
Windows).
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
Joel W. Crump" wrote:
All this and you spend good money on Apple's borked Unix implementation. >>>> Why not just use Linux?
For the same reasons one might drive a Lexus instead of a Corolla.
Corolla?
<https://web.stanford.edu/class/cs81n/command.txt>
A better analogy would be automatic vs manual transmission. Some
people want more control.
I want Trump to his his knees and blow me wearing a black
latex Gimp costume
I use Windows because I don't care to learn about programming a
computer.
On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 08:11:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
I have learned much more about Microsoft by using the Linux
operating system than I ever would have done by using
Windows).
I use Windows because I don't care to learn about programming a
computer.
Governor Swill wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed):
On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 08:11:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
I have learned much more about Microsoft by using the Linux
operating system than I ever would have done by using
Windows).
I use Windows because I don't care to learn about programming a
computer.
You don't have to "learn about programming". Most distros will set
up a nice pretty desktop system that differs from Windows only in
the exact look and the names of the applications that give similar functionality to those common on Windows. (And many of those
applications work on Windows, Linux, and Mac).
That being said, if you're happy with what you got or you don't
like change, however minor, stick with whatcha got.
I've gotten so used to Linux (and my peculiar setup) that anything
else (even a different desktop manager) feels clumsy to me.
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
For the same reasons one might drive a Lexus instead of a Corolla.
Corolla?
All masculine men should drive a Yaris.
Don't you agree Chris Ahlstrom?
On 8/3/2026 11:21 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed):
On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 08:11:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
I have learned much more about Microsoft by using the Linux
operating system than I ever would have done by using
Windows).
I use Windows because I don't care to learn about programming a
computer.
You don't have to "learn about programming". Most distros will set
up a nice pretty desktop system that differs from Windows only in
the exact look and the names of the applications that give similar
functionality to those common on Windows. (And many of those
applications work on Windows, Linux, and Mac).
That being said, if you're happy with what you got or you don't
like change, however minor, stick with whatcha got.
I've gotten so used to Linux (and my peculiar setup) that anything
else (even a different desktop manager) feels clumsy to me.
He might have a point in that there are a lot of arcane console commands >needed to fully set up Linux, apps that aren't just provided by the
distro or some other maneuver, but once you get the hang of that Linux
is not any harder to use than Winblows.
On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 11:37:53 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/3/2026 11:21 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed):
I use Windows because I don't care to learn about programming a
computer.
You don't have to "learn about programming". Most distros will set
up a nice pretty desktop system that differs from Windows only in
the exact look and the names of the applications that give similar
functionality to those common on Windows. (And many of those
applications work on Windows, Linux, and Mac).
That being said, if you're happy with what you got or you don't
like change, however minor, stick with whatcha got.
I've gotten so used to Linux (and my peculiar setup) that anything
else (even a different desktop manager) feels clumsy to me.
He might have a point in that there are a lot of arcane console commands
needed to fully set up Linux, apps that aren't just provided by the
distro or some other maneuver, but once you get the hang of that Linux
is not any harder to use than Winblows.
You said it better than I did. These days, Windows just does it all automatically. It finds and installs drivers and driver updates, for example. I don't remember the last time I had to manually install a
driver from a disk or a download.
Linux, otoh, requires much more operator interaction.
Consider the computer illiteracy of the average American. Bad as
Windows might be for them to figure out, if they'd had to use Linux
all this time, we still wouldn't have a computer society and I doubt
we'd have smartphones.
On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 11:37:53 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/3/2026 11:21 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed):
On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 08:11:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
I have learned much more about Microsoft by using the Linux
operating system than I ever would have done by using
Windows).
I use Windows because I don't care to learn about programming a
computer.
You don't have to "learn about programming". Most distros will set
up a nice pretty desktop system that differs from Windows only in
the exact look and the names of the applications that give similar
functionality to those common on Windows. (And many of those
applications work on Windows, Linux, and Mac).
That being said, if you're happy with what you got or you don't
like change, however minor, stick with whatcha got.
I've gotten so used to Linux (and my peculiar setup) that anything
else (even a different desktop manager) feels clumsy to me.
He might have a point in that there are a lot of arcane console commands >>needed to fully set up Linux, apps that aren't just provided by the
distro or some other maneuver, but once you get the hang of that Linux
is not any harder to use than Winblows.
You said it better than I did. These days, Windows just does it all automatically. It finds and installs drivers and driver updates, for example. I don't remember the last time I had to manually install a
driver from a disk or a download.
Linux, otoh, requires much more operator interaction.
Consider the computer illiteracy of the average American. Bad as
Windows might be for them to figure out, if they'd had to use Linux
all this time, we still wouldn't have a computer society and I doubt
we'd have smartphones.
On 8/3/2026 10:40 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 11:37:53 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/3/2026 11:21 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed):
I use Windows because I don't care to learn about programming a
computer.
You don't have to "learn about programming". Most distros will set
up a nice pretty desktop system that differs from Windows only in
the exact look and the names of the applications that give similar
functionality to those common on Windows. (And many of those
applications work on Windows, Linux, and Mac).
That being said, if you're happy with what you got or you don't
like change, however minor, stick with whatcha got.
I've gotten so used to Linux (and my peculiar setup) that anything
else (even a different desktop manager) feels clumsy to me.
He might have a point in that there are a lot of arcane console commands >>> needed to fully set up Linux, apps that aren't just provided by the
distro or some other maneuver, but once you get the hang of that Linux
is not any harder to use than Winblows.
You said it better than I did. These days, Windows just does it all
automatically. It finds and installs drivers and driver updates, for
example. I don't remember the last time I had to manually install a
driver from a disk or a download.
Linux, otoh, requires much more operator interaction.
Consider the computer illiteracy of the average American. Bad as
Windows might be for them to figure out, if they'd had to use Linux
all this time, we still wouldn't have a computer society and I doubt
we'd have smartphones.
It is easier to utilize Windows without learning arcane things, yes. It >exists in Windows, too, though, e.g. PowerShell.
Governor Swill wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed):
On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 11:37:53 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/3/2026 11:21 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed):
On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 08:11:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
I have learned much more about Microsoft by using the Linux
operating system than I ever would have done by using
Windows).
I use Windows because I don't care to learn about programming a
computer.
You don't have to "learn about programming". Most distros will set
up a nice pretty desktop system that differs from Windows only in
the exact look and the names of the applications that give similar
functionality to those common on Windows. (And many of those
applications work on Windows, Linux, and Mac).
That being said, if you're happy with what you got or you don't
like change, however minor, stick with whatcha got.
I've gotten so used to Linux (and my peculiar setup) that anything
else (even a different desktop manager) feels clumsy to me.
He might have a point in that there are a lot of arcane console commands >>>needed to fully set up Linux, apps that aren't just provided by the >>>distro or some other maneuver, but once you get the hang of that Linux >>>is not any harder to use than Winblows.
You said it better than I did. These days, Windows just does it all
automatically. It finds and installs drivers and driver updates, for
example. I don't remember the last time I had to manually install a
driver from a disk or a download.
Linux, otoh, requires much more operator interaction.
Depends on the distro. Ubuntu, for example, will do it all for
you.
I prefer to initiate an update manually, once in awhile. It's
really difficult, especially from the command line:
Debian:
$ sudo aptitude
Type U to download updates.
Type u to flag the packages for update.
Type g to go!
And that is doing it the hard way.
Arch:
$ sudo pacman -Syu
Oh the horror!
Consider the computer illiteracy of the average American. Bad as
Windows might be for them to figure out, if they'd had to use Linux
all this time, we still wouldn't have a computer society and I doubt
we'd have smartphones.
A silly point, which ignores how long it took DOS and Windows to
become dominant, even with the machinations of Bill Gates.
It ignores the long evolution of computing.
Who remembers these computers?
Timex Sinclair
Commodore 64 and VIC 20 (the latter was my first computer)
Atari 400 and 800
BeOS
Atari ST (I loved this computer!)
Commodore Amiga
Message for crockpot and crude, among other racists:
World tensions have, if anything, increased in the quarter century since
H. G. Wells uttered his glum warning: "There is no more evil thing on
earth than race prejudice, none at all. I write deliberately -- it is
the worst single thing in life now. It justifies and holds together more >baseness, cruelty and abomination than any other sort of error in the world."
-- Sydney Harris
there are a lot of arcane console commands
needed to fully set up Linux, apps that aren't just provided by the
distro or some other maneuver, but once you get the hang of that Linux >>>> is not any harder to use than Winblows.
You said it better than I did. These days, Windows just does it all
automatically. It finds and installs drivers and driver updates, for
example. I don't remember the last time I had to manually install a
driver from a disk or a download.
Linux, otoh, requires much more operator interaction.
Consider the computer illiteracy of the average American. Bad as
Windows might be for them to figure out, if they'd had to use Linux
all this time, we still wouldn't have a computer society and I doubt
we'd have smartphones.
It is easier to utilize Windows without learning arcane things, yes. It
exists in Windows, too, though, e.g. PowerShell.
That's just it. Windows not only does a better job of automaticity, Microsoft *still* makes custom configuration possible.
On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 07:57:12 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom
<OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
<snip>
Exactly. I can't see grandma doing such a manual computer chore.
Consider the computer illiteracy of the average American. Bad as
Windows might be for them to figure out, if they'd had to use Linux
all this time, we still wouldn't have a computer society and I doubt
we'd have smartphones.
A silly point, which ignores how long it took DOS and Windows to
become dominant, even with the machinations of Bill Gates.
Didn't take very long at all, actually. Ten years? Eight? Six?
Five?
It ignores the long evolution of computing.
Who remembers these computers?
Timex Sinclair
Commodore 64 and VIC 20 (the latter was my first computer)
Atari 400 and 800
BeOS
Atari ST (I loved this computer!)
Commodore Amiga
My first computer was a VIC20, second was a C64, third was a Windows
3.0 PC bought in 1993. The day I bought that machine, Windows was the
only operating system offered in the store.
Windows was introduced in 1985. Those systems all became obsolete or
shut out of the market by ILM/Windows within six or seven years.
In article <114meia$5rbu$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 14:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lpoc$3v8f3$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 14:49, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114loo2$3v0iq$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-08-01 13:41, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lijq$3stab$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-08-01 07:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jtig$3aeu9$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g718$226ao$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:That isn't childish. That is fact. You will be running again. This we know.
In article <114ensi$1f0p7$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414lm$14htd$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote:
In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
Oh CRAP!
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07-aAM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
portrays a successful professional. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link)
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #2
-a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
-a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
-a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
-a> your age. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -a>
-a> Have a great holiday weekend. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43-aPM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03-aPM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
And now I've set it to the correct image... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...until he dreams up a new "theory". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence".
Is that your new white flag?
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
Not your choice. You are like a clown.
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake? >>>>>>>>>>>
You'll be humping my leg until I get bored..
..and then you'll declare that "victory".
I won't be running like you do. I like that you copy my material. >>>>>>>>>
Like you copy mine?
Show me an instance where I ever did that cupcake.
You mean other than right there, Cupcake?
Or when you started calling me "buttercup", Cupcake?
:-)
I called you that months ago and you started using it. Nice try though. >>>>>
Nope. You started it quite recently, Cupcake...
...but go ahead and support your claim.
I been calling people that for years. Stop being stupid buttercup.
Sure.....
...and yet you cannot produce an example of you calling it me "months ago">
I don't need to. I know and that's all that matters. You have nothing original.
In article <114lpmo$3v8f3$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 14:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lomv$3v0iq$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lij9$3stab$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-08-01 07:34, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jthe$3aeu9$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114gan2$23lph$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g7ne$22h0j$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake? >>>>>>>>>>>>
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter: You are one dumb bastard.
Because I smack you and Alan around all the time? Alan already said he doesn't
like you.
1. In your dreams, Cupcake.
2. Nope. I never said that.
You did. Stop humping my posts.
Prove something...
...for once.
You are far behind in that. Catch up and then maybe you can make demands.
Nope.
I've provided far more proofs than you ever have.
Nope. You run away or twist the subject around. We saw through your game a long
time ago.
Yup.
To my recollection, you've only ever support a claim of your ONCE.
I post plenty and I don't run away like you do.
Give an example of a claim you've supported.
I don't take orders from you.
On 2026-08-01 14:54, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lpmo$3v8f3$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 14:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lomv$3v0iq$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lij9$3stab$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-08-01 07:34, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jthe$3aeu9$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114gan2$23lph$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g7ne$22h0j$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake? >>>>>>>>>>>>
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter: You are one dumb bastard.
Because I smack you and Alan around all the time? Alan already said he doesn't
like you.
1. In your dreams, Cupcake.
2. Nope. I never said that.
You did. Stop humping my posts.
Prove something...
...for once.
You are far behind in that. Catch up and then maybe you can make demands.
Nope.
I've provided far more proofs than you ever have.
Nope. You run away or twist the subject around. We saw through your game a long
time ago.
Yup.
To my recollection, you've only ever support a claim of your ONCE.
I post plenty and I don't run away like you do.
Give an example of a claim you've supported.
I don't take orders from you.
Of course you do...
On 2026-08-02 07:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114meia$5rbu$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 14:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lpoc$3v8f3$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 14:49, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114loo2$3v0iq$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-08-01 13:41, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lijq$3stab$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-08-01 07:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jtig$3aeu9$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g718$226ao$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
That isn't childish. That is fact. You will be running again. This we know.
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114ensi$1f0p7$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-25 07:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11414lm$14htd$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 18:26, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114115a$13evc$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <11410tp$1383u$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 17:39, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <1140u9i$13147$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-07-24 16:16, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <1140kf2$10d8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
Is that your new white flag?
On 2026-07-24 12:12, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/21/26 4:30 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-21 06:17, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/21/26 8:33 AM, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. My photo changed on the DF site because I was asked to provide
The fact is I brought it to your attention and you changed it immediately.one more in keeping with the rest of the photos of our people.Not true. I was the instigator of the photo change. You replied back
to me with when I pointed out the Digital Finance picture was
inappropriate for that site. Here are some conversation links, Liarboy.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/X5OdixG7haQ/
m/2bxsJHhQBQAJ
So you lied about why you changed the photo. You are lying about the
photo dates to. No way those are 2 years apart unless you had a
major illness, mental or physical. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If you look at those 2 pictures you would never know they are the
same person. Are you some sort of chameleon who can shape-change
into whatever appearance meets the needs of the day?
Oh CRAP!
I needed to post the quotes not just the message thread repeated 5
times. I'm a dufus.
Thread post #1
Thomas E.
Dec 29, 2022, 9:24:07aAM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...
Finally, please tell us why you think this selfie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://digitalfinancial.ca/alan-baker/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
portrays a successful professional. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
A professional's head shot looks like this (dead link)
I am well dressed, no scraggly facial hair, neutral background,
looking directly at the camera, friendly smile. And it's all genuine,
that is who I am.
None of that is present in your photo, or your LinkedIn photo. Do you
actually want people to take you seriously? Do you know that body
language speaks louder than words? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post #2
a> And those selfies! OMG. Are you trying to scare away potential
a> Digital Financial clients? If I was in management and saw those I
a> would take them down and let you know to clean up your act and act
a> your age. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a>
a> Have a great holiday weekend. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Fuck you.
Say some of this in person some time, Lying Little Shit.
Post #3
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 1:21:43aPM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
Meh.
I didn't even realize that that photo was still on that page.
I was building the site and threw up the first photo I had.
Post #4
Alan
Dec 30, 2022, 7:08:03aPM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
And now I've set it to the correct image... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...which will make the Lying Little Shit happy... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...until he dreams up a new "theory". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So? That doesn't mean I wasn't also in a conversation with the DF
leadership about the images for the site as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nope.
That's called a "coincidence". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nope.
Face it you're done. This thread is toast. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So you're waving your white flag.
Got it.
I am declaring victory by default.
Which is the only "victory" you can get.
Then against you I have a lot.
If you declare yourself victor...
...it's easy to win.
I win!
Not your choice. You are like a clown.
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake? >>>>>>>>>>>
You'll be humping my leg until I get bored..
..and then you'll declare that "victory".
I won't be running like you do. I like that you copy my material. >>>>>>>>>
Like you copy mine?
Show me an instance where I ever did that cupcake.
You mean other than right there, Cupcake?
Or when you started calling me "buttercup", Cupcake?
:-)
I called you that months ago and you started using it. Nice try though. >>>>>
Nope. You started it quite recently, Cupcake...
...but go ahead and support your claim.
I been calling people that for years. Stop being stupid buttercup.
Sure.....
...and yet you cannot produce an example of you calling it me "months ago">
I don't need to. I know and that's all that matters. You have nothing original.
You have nothing period.
In article <11501t6$38poo$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 14:54, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lpmo$3v8f3$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-08-01 14:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114lomv$3v0iq$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>
On 2026-08-01 13:40, Skeeter wrote:I post plenty and I don't run away like you do.
In article <114lij9$3stab$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 2026-08-01 07:34, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114jthe$3aeu9$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114gan2$23lph$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-07-30 12:35, Skeeter wrote:
In article <114g7ne$22h0j$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 7/30/2026 3:00 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-07-30 08:04, Skeeter wrote:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Childish
Like declaring "victory by default", you mean, Cupcake? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Unbelievable ...
Skeeter: You are one dumb bastard.
Because I smack you and Alan around all the time? Alan already said he doesn't
like you.
1. In your dreams, Cupcake.
2. Nope. I never said that.
You did. Stop humping my posts.
Prove something...
...for once.
You are far behind in that. Catch up and then maybe you can make demands.
Nope.
I've provided far more proofs than you ever have.
Nope. You run away or twist the subject around. We saw through your game a long
time ago.
Yup.
To my recollection, you've only ever support a claim of your ONCE. >>>>>
Give an example of a claim you've supported.
I don't take orders from you.
Of course you do...
That's it? That's what's in your empty quiver?
Governor Swill wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed):
On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 07:57:12 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom
<OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
<snip>
Exactly. I can't see grandma doing such a manual computer chore.
And that's why automated updates are the default on the major
consumer distros, such as Ubuntu.
Consider the computer illiteracy of the average American. Bad as
Windows might be for them to figure out, if they'd had to use Linux
all this time, we still wouldn't have a computer society and I doubt
we'd have smartphones.
A silly point, which ignores how long it took DOS and Windows to
become dominant, even with the machinations of Bill Gates.
Didn't take very long at all, actually. Ten years? Eight? Six?
Five?
MS-DOS came out in 1981.
Windows came out in 1985 (and was shit, especially compared to the
Atari ST).
Windows 3 came out in 1990, and was probably the first reasonably
reliable version.
It ignores the long evolution of computing.
Who remembers these computers?
Timex Sinclair
Commodore 64 and VIC 20 (the latter was my first computer)
Atari 400 and 800
BeOS
Atari ST (I loved this computer!)
Commodore Amiga
My first computer was a VIC20, second was a C64, third was a Windows
3.0 PC bought in 1993. The day I bought that machine, Windows was the
only operating system offered in the store.
Windows was introduced in 1985. Those systems all became obsolete or
shut out of the market by ILM/Windows within six or seven years.
The Microsoft anti-trust case was around 1998 to 2002.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 45:27:21 |
| Calls: | 1,100 |
| Files: | 1,339 |
| Messages: | 275,372 |