Greetings!
I received my C64U Starlight Monday. I absolutely love this machine. I'm 45 and got a CoCo 2 for my fifth birthday and have been into computers my whole life. I'm living an alternate reality childhood had I gotten a Commodore instead of a CoCo. My oldest nephew is five, and he and his little brother LOVE all my retro tech. We played Nintendo for FOUR HOURS STRAIGHT last Saturday, first time I've done that since I was single-digit aged. I'm going to take the machine to them and teach them BASIC, all that good stuff.
I've made a few videos this week with Commodore at youtube.com/bollingholt
I'm hoping to attach my 1541 to it this weekend and go through some BOXES of disks I recently acquired with a TI-99/4A haul, but I think it's mainly Commodore software. Looking forward to it!!!
Bo Holt
... Torture: The Ultimate Art Form.
I'm going to take the machine to them and teach
them BASIC
Daniel wrote to All <=-
Good news. Tell us how you get along. I considered getting a c64 from perifractic but I can't get over the funky keyboard layout of the commodores. I have a mini and can't really find a good for it. And I'm
not nostalgic for the games.
I hope you find a treasure in that pile of floppies.
Good news. Tell us how you get along. I considered getting a c64 from perifractic but I can't get over the funky keyboard layout of the commodores. I have a mini and can't really find a good for it. And I'mI cut my teeh on a CoCo 2, so it's "new nostalgia" for me LOL. I didn't
not nostalgic for the games.
I hope you find a treasure in that pile of floppies.
Daniel
sysop | air & wave bbs
finger | calcmandan@bbs.erb.pw
--- PyGate Linux v1.5.12
* Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
Bo Holt <usenet@vk3heg.net> wrote:
I'm going to take the machine to them and teach
them BASIC
Oh no! Keep the kids away from BASIC as it is
one of the most horrendous programming languages
ever invented.
Better to fire up a Fedora Linux or FreeBSD VM and have
the kids learn Python or anything saner than BASIC.
Back in the 1980s BASIC was better than nothing, but
should not be used again in 2026.
br,
KK
What horrible advice.
C64 BASIC is beyond awful and should never be used in 2026. Why would anyone torture kids with that lame BASIC?
...C64 BASIC which is quite possibly the worst programming language ever invented.
Linux and FreeBSD are paradise for programmers, beginners or advanced.
Come on... Let's split hairs. The first is a Kernel, the latter is an OS...
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
By: Kalevi Kolttonen to All on Wed Mar 11 2026 10:00:02
...C64 BASIC which is quite possibly the worst programming language ever invented.
You've never used Algol.
Linux and FreeBSD are paradise for programmers, beginners or advanced.
Those are OSes, not languages.
Mortar M. wrote to Kalevi Kolttonen <=-
You've never used Algol.
Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> wrote:
What horrible advice.
Why do you say so? Python 3 is a nice and clean
language with all the features you would expect
from a good programming language. Fedora Linux
and FreeBSD are millions of times more advanced
than poor old C64. Programming in BASIC using
the horrible C64 screen editor is nothing but
a bad joke in 2026. I have to laugh thinking
about it... Hahah!
BASIC on a C64 lacks almost everything:
no proper WHILE looping, no proper
function calls, no proper data structures,
identifiers are only valid for the two
starting characters. C64 BASIC is beyond awful
and should never be used in 2026. Why would
anyone torture kids with that lame BASIC?
C64 is a great platform for learning
assembly programming though but even so
you should write the code on Linux or FreeBSD
using a proper text editor and a cross assembler,
testing your program with VICE.
br,
KK
Many of us wet our feet on basic as children. In fact, many people
progressed into the world of software development from that
introduction. One could argue that it helped lead into the industry
we have today.
You told him not to introduce the kids to that same joy he
experienced with an end-of-world urgency. As if they'll be irreparably
harmed by it. Sheesh.
He's doing it to bond with the kids. Maybe he will help them code their
own games and get that satisfaction like he did. For years magazines
supplied source code for games. I used to stay in the computer lab after school to code them myself, since we didn't have a computer at my
home. We had atari game system.
Algol begat Pascal. Pascal is the mother language for pretty much every modern programming language today.
My bad. I ment APL. Keep getting those confused.
Oh no! Keep the kids away from BASIC as it is
one of the most horrendous programming languages
ever invented.
Better to fire up a Fedora Linux or FreeBSD VM and have
the kids learn Python or anything saner than BASIC.
Back in the 1980s BASIC was better than nothing, but
should not be used again in 2026.
br,
KK
You told him not to introduce the kids to that same joy he
experienced with an end-of-world urgency. As if they'll be irreparably harmed by it. Sheesh.
He's doing it to bond with the kids. Maybe he will help them code their
own games and get that satisfaction like he did. For years magazines supplied source code for games. I used to stay in the computer lab after school to code them myself, since we didn't have a computer at my
home. We had atari game system.
--- PyGate Linux v1.5.12
* Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
Nah, python is better.Oh no! Keep the kids away from BASIC as it is
one of the most horrendous programming languages
ever invented.
Better to fire up a Fedora Linux or FreeBSD VM and have
the kids learn Python or anything saner than BASIC.
Back in the 1980s BASIC was better than nothing, but
should not be used again in 2026.
br,
KK
Basic is still fun to play with. They are only 5 and 3 anyway LOL. They we only interested in games anyway, for the time being. ;)
... Most have good aims in life, but few pull the trigger.
Nah, python is better.
BASIC really only makes sense if you are still using an 80s microcomputer.
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
By: Kalevi Kolttonen to All on Tue Mar 10 2026 13:30:01
C64 BASIC is beyond awful and should never be used in 2026. Why would anyone
torture kids with that lame BASIC?
I think you're missing the point of retro-computing.
Mortar M. <usenet@vk3heg.net> wrote:
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
By: Kalevi Kolttonen to All on Tue Mar 10 2026 13:30:01
anyoneC64 BASIC is beyond awful and should never be used in 2026. Why would
torture kids with that lame BASIC?
I think you're missing the point of retro-computing.
Right?
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
By: Dennis Katsonis to marika on Fri Apr 10 2026 22:44:14
To be frank, C64 basic wasn't that great, even back then.
Agreed. Considering the number of Commodore micros already in the wild, you think they'd have improved the BASIC for the VIC and 64, as these were inten for non-computer savvy people.
My first computer was a VZ 200, which predated the C64 (I think it was so as a V-Tech 200 in the US.
I vaguely remember reading about this in magazines, but never actually seen one. After looking it up online, I can see why. It was only around for two year and had low specs. No way could it have competed with the likes of the C=64 or even the Atari 400. However, it did not pre-date the 64. The VZ-20 came out in '83, while the 64 came out a year earlier.
To be frank, C64 basic wasn't that great, even back then.
My first computer was a VZ 200, which predated the C64 (I think it was sold as a V-Tech 200 in the US.
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
By: Mortar M. to Dennis Katsonis on Sat Apr 11 2026 01:41 pm
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
By: Dennis Katsonis to marika on Fri Apr 10 2026 22:44:14
To be frank, C64 basic wasn't that great, even back then.
Agreed. Considering the number of Commodore micros already in the wild, yo think they'd have improved the BASIC for the VIC and 64, as these were inte for non-computer savvy people.
My first computer was a VZ 200, which predated the C64 (I think it was s as a V-Tech 200 in the US.
I vaguely remember reading about this in magazines, but never actually seen one. After looking it up online, I can see why. It was only around for tw year and had low specs. No way could it have competed with the likes of th C=64 or even the Atari 400. However, it did not pre-date the 64. The VZ-2 came out in '83, while the 64 came out a year earlier.
I got the VZ200 in 1991, quite a bit after it release. My parents got it garage sale cheap (buying a new computer was a bit much back then, just fo to use). It was a bit dissapointing as I wanted the Atari 1040STE, but as had just been introduced to BASIC at school, it was fun to try BASIC at ho and draw graphics and make basic games.
Dick Smith started an electronics store called, Dick Smith Electronics, an VZ 200 was their rebrand, sold with his face on it.
A little later that year, they got a Vic 20 at a garage sale, which had be graphics, but lacked the drawing commands. A little later, the C64 came, second hand. You could do sprites, but again, no graphics. Not without entering some other machine code subroutines.
I suppose they had to get it out quick, and once it was out, you can't pat it.
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Win32
* Origin: MS & RD BBS bbsweb.mozysswamp.org (3:633/384)
|03Quoting message from |11Dennis Katsonis |03to |11Mortar M.
|03on |1112 Apr 26 11:25:58|03.
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
By: Mortar M. to Dennis Katsonis on Sat Apr 11 2026 01:41 pm
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
By: Dennis Katsonis to marika on Fri Apr 10 2026 22:44:14
To be frank, C64 basic wasn't that great, even back then.
Agreed. Considering the number of Commodore micros already in the wild, yo
think they'd have improved the BASIC for the VIC and 64, as these were inte
for non-computer savvy people.
My first computer was a VZ 200, which predated the C64 (I think it was s
as a V-Tech 200 in the US.
I vaguely remember reading about this in magazines, but never actually seen
one. After looking it up online, I can see why. It was only around for tw
year and had low specs. No way could it have competed with the likes of th
C=64 or even the Atari 400. However, it did not pre-date the 64. The VZ-2
came out in '83, while the 64 came out a year earlier.
I got the VZ200 in 1991, quite a bit after it release. My parents got it garage sale cheap (buying a new computer was a bit much back then, just fo
to use). It was a bit dissapointing as I wanted the Atari 1040STE, but as
had just been introduced to BASIC at school, it was fun to try BASIC at ho
and draw graphics and make basic games.
Dick Smith started an electronics store called, Dick Smith Electronics, an
VZ 200 was their rebrand, sold with his face on it.
A little later that year, they got a Vic 20 at a garage sale, which had be
graphics, but lacked the drawing commands. A little later, the C64 came, second hand. You could do sprites, but again, no graphics. Not without entering some other machine code subroutines.
I suppose they had to get it out quick, and once it was out, you can't pat
it.
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Win32
* Origin: MS & RD BBS bbsweb.mozysswamp.org (3:633/384)
I am 45. My gradnfather got me a Timex Sinclair when I was 2, CoCo2 when I turned 5 (really cut my teeth on that one), then his hand-me-down Amstrad PC1512DD when I was in the fourth grade, and then in 192 started as an apprentice at our local computer store and learned to build machines and built
my 486DX-33. I never stopped working in the field since I started in 1992, and I started BBSing back on the CoCo2. I never knew anyone with a Commodore when I was growing up, so I'm enjoying living an alternate-reality childhood with the C64U. I'm trying to spark an interest in computers with my nephews and nieces (they are much younger than 5 still), they already love allmy vintage electronics I bring, and it's fun to play with these things with them.
... Message sent. Destroy immediately upon receipt.
I suppose they had to get it out quick, and once it was out, you can't patch
Bo Holt wrote to Dennis Katsonis <=-|03Quoting message from |11Dennis Katsonis |03to |11Mortar M.
@MSGID: <69DBC6D4.1377.fidocbm@bbs.mozysswamp.org>
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
By: Mortar M. to Dennis Katsonis on Sat Apr 11 2026 01:41 pm
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
By: Dennis Katsonis to marika on Fri Apr 10 2026 22:44:14
To be frank, C64 basic wasn't that great, even back then.
Agreed. Considering the number of Commodore micros already in the wild, yo think they'd have improved the BASIC for the VIC and 64, as these were inte for non-computer savvy people.
My first computer was a VZ 200, which predated the C64 (I think it was s as a V-Tech 200 in the US.
I vaguely remember reading about this in magazines, but never actually seen one. After looking it up online, I can see why. It was only around for tw year and had low specs. No way could it have competed with the likes of th C=64 or even the Atari 400. However, it did not pre-date the 64. The VZ-2 came out in '83, while the 64 came out a year earlier.
I got the VZ200 in 1991, quite a bit after it release. My parents got it garage sale cheap (buying a new computer was a bit much back then, just fo to use). It was a bit dissapointing as I wanted the Atari 1040STE, but as had just been introduced to BASIC at school, it was fun to try BASIC at ho and draw graphics and make basic games.
Dick Smith started an electronics store called, Dick Smith Electronics, an VZ 200 was their rebrand, sold with his face on it.
A little later that year, they got a Vic 20 at a garage sale, which had be graphics, but lacked the drawing commands. A little later, the C64 came, second hand. You could do sprites, but again, no graphics. Not without entering some other machine code subroutines.
I suppose they had to get it out quick, and once it was out, you can't pat it.
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Win32
* Origin: MS & RD BBS bbsweb.mozysswamp.org (3:633/384)
I am 45. My gradnfather got me a Timex Sinclair when I was 2, CoCo2
when I turned 5 (really cut my teeth on that one), then his
hand-me-down Amstrad PC1512DD when I was in the fourth grade, and then
in 192 started as an apprentice at our local computer store and learned
to build machines and built my 486DX-33. I never stopped working in
the field since I started in 1992, and I started BBSing back on the
CoCo2. I never knew anyone with a Commodore when I was growing up, so
I'm enjoying living an alternate-reality childhood with the C64U. I'm trying to spark an interest in computers with my nephews and nieces
(they are much younger than 5 still), they already love allmy vintage electronics I bring, and it's fun to play with these things with them.
Mortar M. wrote to Dennis Katsonis <=-
@MSGID: <69DD42CA.1380.fidocbm@bbs.mozysswamp.org>
@REPLY: <69DAF4A6.1376.fidocbm@bbs.mozysswamp.org>
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
By: Dennis Katsonis to Mortar M. on Sun Apr 12 2026 11:25:58
I suppose they had to get it out quick, and once it was out, you can't patch
Nope. However, the BASIC and Kernal ROMs were socketed, so it is
possible to replace the originals with new ones. However, Commodore
was a very cost-conscious company so such an expense would've probably been rejected outright.
Nope. However, the BASIC and Kernal ROMs were socketed, so it is
possible to replace the originals with new ones.
The problem is you can't rework the already sold units.
Then you have incompatible BASIC variants, leaving the original buyers in the cold.
Mortar M. wrote to Dennis Katsonis <=-
@MSGID: <69DE5C47.1383.fidocbm@bbs.mozysswamp.org>
@REPLY: <69DE4C8E.1382.fidocbm@bbs.mozysswamp.org>
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate
By: Dennis Katsonis to Mortar M. on Tue Apr 14 2026 23:48:00
Nope. However, the BASIC and Kernal ROMs were socketed, so it is
possible to replace the originals with new ones.
The problem is you can't rework the already sold units.
I believe I just indicated you could. If Commodore followed this path, the chips could've been sold as an upgrade, for those who wanted to
make the change.
Then you have incompatible BASIC variants, leaving the original buyers in the cold.
Unlike business systems where compatibility is important, the home
market at that time had no such need. As you indicated, there were already numerous BASIC dialects in the wild, by Commodore and
third-party vendors and thanks to various sources like magazines, user groups, etc., most were supported in some fashion.
I did get my daughters to enjoy a few Commodore 64 games on the
emulator, mainly "Ducks Ahoy", "International Soccer" and "Decathlon".
they watched my play "Beamrider" which was a favourite of mine too.
Never got them into programming. They have Windows laptops now, and
use those, but aren't that interested in learning how they actually
work.
Its hard to get them intersted, as there are so many distractions.
One thing that helped our generation, was when you got those microcomputeres, there wasn't much eles you could to but program.
Now, a new computer instantly has internet, YouTube, all the
distractions. Back then, there was nothing, so may as well go through
the manual.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
* Origin: MS & RD BBS bbsweb.mozysswamp.org (3:633/384)
I spent most my childhood outdoors climbing trees or playing sports - or various other things kids used to do pre-internet.I was awful at sports... total nerd at least until 9th grade.
I would be inside during the rain. We had an Atari game console and had
5-6 cartridges. One of them was defender and that was the best game we
had. That game got old quite fast. Honestly, I was a bookworm. Video
games were rather uninspiring to me until many years later. Our schools
had Apple 2's because Apple donated them. I wasn't really inspired to
learn programming because the teachers didn't TEACH us to
program. Back in those days, our schools had one teacher per class for
all day. And none of them were trained in computer science. It took
years for the school system, at least in my area, to catch up with the times. Nowadays, these schools look like mini-college campii.
We had pre-written basic games we'd spend a long time typing into the terminal. Assuming I didn't mess up somewhere, I'd have a few minutes to play hangman or whatever it was. Nothing to write home about. Nothing
was saved and, all the work was gone when the computers were switched
off.
It just didn't hit me hard in those days. I preferred to spend recess
time outside instead of in front of a computer typing line code I
didn't understand. I had classmates who really soaked it in though and
some would hand write basic code at home and do the work at
school. Most of us didn't have computers - so our screen time
was limited to school. And in the later elementary grade, girls were
getting interesting to me and they weren't in the computer room.
Anyway, my first computer at home was in the 90s after coming home from
the navy. My brother took me with him to Fry's and I helped him select a computer case. The other components he had already identified before
the trip. I watched a computer being built for the first time. I had no
idea what was what. Everything looked alien to me. Times have changed.
I follow the likes of the C64 community out of curiousity. I'm more of a lurker to be honest. My actual daily driver (as in constant use) for
my writing hobby is a Tandy laptop. The model 200. I also have spare 100
and 102's laying around for mod projects. It does what I set out to do, write. And I can do that well. The keyboard layout isn't all fucked
up. I don't see a caps lock in the south pole and the " key isn't in boonyville. They're in the proper position.
I bought a C64 mini on sale at gamestop 5-6 years ago. I played a few
games for a bit and, well, it's in the closet somewhere. I tried to load other utilities via a flash card but nothing seemed to work without
serious hacking. So, so, so not interested in that. The games were
OKAY and I could understand what kids my age saw in it. My exposure to
the Commodore platform came just a few years ago. Otherwise, it was just
a subject in echonets when I dialed into BBSes.
I'm currently considering the purchase of an Atari ST 800XL with a
modern keyboard replacement. The original keyboard was a hunk of
shit while the modern replacements use modern switches and the keys are
in the modern locations. Still have a ton of reading to do about the platform and whether I wish to dive into it versus staying with my
beloved Tandy.
Daniel
--
sysop | air & wave bbs
finger | calcmandan@bbs.erb.pw
--- PyGate Linux v1.5.14
* Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
Bo Holt wrote to Daniel <=-
In elementary, our school was also dominated by Apple IIes, but no programming. Just a bunch of MECC games. In high school they taught basic computer skills and typing.
Mortar M. wrote to Dennis Katsonis <=-
@MSGID: <69E654B9.1387.fidocbm@bbs.mozysswamp.org>
@REPLY: <69E47B19.1386.fidocbm@bbs.mozysswamp.org>
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate
By: Dennis Katsonis to Mortar M. on Sun Apr 19 2026 16:49:00
That may be true. I'm thinking of all the books and magazines that
had listings. They would have had to have catered to the lowest
common denominator (the built in BASIC).
Many of them did. I had quite a library of such books, as well as
dialect specific ones. Some books even included a section on
converting between BASICs.
Sad.
For me, the schools didn't have much in the way of computers, but we got a to them (by hook or by crook) and learned programming on our own. By the my high school offered a computer class (programming), several of us alrea knew more than the teacher.
My dad taught computers in Jr. High and it was closer to what you describe Learn how to use the computer and was light on programming.
But it also reminds me of the types of computers.
When I started, the school had TRS-80's - mostly ones that the PTA purchas for them.
Later, they all went Commodore PET - mostly because Commodore offered the schools deals (I think it was a buy 3 for the price of 2).
It wasn't until much later that Apple realized that the computer kids use the schools are the ones that they ask their parents to purchase for home offered even better "deals" (i.e. they looked like deals, but Apple was pa off their unsellable hardware).
... No, no, nurse! I said SLIP off his SPECTACLES!!
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
Sometimes I think back and realize we were still in the very early days
of microcomputing, and there was still no standard set yet, and no one knew just how much computers would permeate our daily lives, for better or for worse... I say for worse as that's why we still call BBSes,
where it still takes more than a pulse to use them LOL.
Dennis Katsonis wrote to Mortar M. <=-
OK. I never much in that way, but also, I didn't have a computer
until 1991, where I had for a few years a few of the old
microcomputers (including the Vic 20 and C64), so I was a bit late to
the game. The books I saw were those at my school library, or
magazines that were lent to me.
Alexander Grotewohl wrote to Bo Holt <=-
grades 1-4 - those school macs
grades 5-6 - ibm ps/2 model 25
grades 7-8 - fully win95, pretty sure they were dell optiplex
machines.
still required to buy floppy disks for storing schoolwork grades 9-12 - citrix winframe, our personalized desktop and storage 'roamed'
with our login, software access based on what classes we were
in, etc
that's a pretty insane leap in technology..
Bo Holt wrote to Dr. What <=-
Sometimes I think back and realize we were still in the very early days
of microcomputing, and there was still no standard set yet,
and no one
knew just how much computers would permeate our daily lives, for better
or for worse...
I say for worse as that's why we still call BBSes,
where it still takes more than a pulse to use them LOL.
For me
grades 1-6 - nothing
grades 7-8 - officially nothing, but dad could get a school TRS-80 for the summer (no one can steal it if it's not in the school).
grades 9-12 - Commodore PET
College - IBM-PC XT clone.
Right after college 386.
...or know something to get on line.
The not-too-smart jerks couldn't get on line.
Then along came AOL....
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate
By: Dr. What to Alexander Grotewohl on Sun Apr 26 2026 12:36:24
For me
grades 1-6 - nothing
grades 7-8 - officially nothing, but dad could get a school TRS-80 for the summer (no one can steal it if it's not in the school).
grades 9-12 - Commodore PET
College - IBM-PC XT clone.
Right after college 386.
My path was much shorter:
Grades 1-11 - Nothing
Grade 12 - Timesharing with remote mainframe via punch cards and 8" floppies.
College - Decwriter II terminals connected to local mainframe. Later
switched to Hazeltine display terminals. Also had 8032 PETs.
Grade 12 - Timesharing with remote mainframe via punch cards and 8" floppies.
Dennis Katsonis wrote to Mortar M. <=-
OK. I never much in that way, but also, I didn't have a computer
until 1991, where I had for a few years a few of the old
microcomputers (including the Vic 20 and C64), so I was a bit late to the game. The books I saw were those at my school library, or magazines that were lent to me.
1991 was Intel 486 time. So, ya, certainly "late to the game". But when we are young and poor, we take what we can get.
But the C64 was popular for quite time time. So I can see someone "food chaining" their old C64 system down to a younger sibling or offspring.
... I have but three enemies: fear, anger, ignorance.--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52
Mortar M. wrote to Dr. What <=-
Well, that's pretty true of anything, right?
What a mess that was. Although there were other services offering Internet access, none had the marketing power that AOL had.
Suddenly you had a flood of online noobs causing (unintended) havoc.
I remember
thinking that it would be a good idea to have people take some kind of test, something like Hams have to do, to grant access to the Net.
Nothing difficult, just the basic questions showing they had at least a working knowledge of how things worked. If they'd done that, I think
we'd have a better class of users today.
Grade 12 - Timesharing with remote mainframe via punch cards and 8" floppies.
Made me wonder, did you have to mail in the punch cards? But I guess the card reader was local?
Floppy disks, sure, although not that size.
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
By: marika to All on Fri Apr 10 2026 03:45 am
Mortar M. <usenet@vk3heg.net> wrote:
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
By: Kalevi Kolttonen to All on Tue Mar 10 2026 13:30:01
anyoneC64 BASIC is beyond awful and should never be used in 2026. Why would
torture kids with that lame BASIC?
I think you're missing the point of retro-computing.
Right?
To be frank, C64 basic wasn't that great, even back then. My first computer was a VZ 200, which predated the C64 (I think it was sold as a V-Tech 200 in the US? Here in Australia it was popular), and even it had a version of basic
where you could draw lines and do graphics.
Oregonian Haruspex wrote to All <=-
Commodore got a cheap deal on an earlier MS BASIC, then stuck with it
with the C64.
But it ended up being less of a disaster than you might
think, because it practically forced people to learn assembly.
A huge
number of legendary programmers got their start because BASIC was too
slow or lacked features.
But it ended up being less of a disaster than you might think, because
it practically forced people to learn assembly. A huge number of
legendary programmers got their start because BASIC was too slow or
lacked features.
So a smart person, who was a jerk, could get online. But since he was sma he contributed and people put up with him.
A not-too-smart person, who was nice, could get a smart person to help him But since he was nice, people enjoyed having him online.
The not-too-smart jerks couldn't get on line.
Then along came AOL....
... Programmers don't get sniffles, they get a CODE.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
Oregonian Haruspex wrote to All <=-would
@MSGID: <69FC0AD9.1413.fidocbm@bbs.mozysswamp.org>
Dennis Katsonis <usenet@vk3heg.net> wrote:
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
By: marika to All on Fri Apr 10 2026 03:45 am
Mortar M. <usenet@vk3heg.net> wrote:
Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
By: Kalevi Kolttonen to All on Tue Mar 10 2026 13:30:01
C64 BASIC is beyond awful and should never be used in 2026. Why
anyone
torture kids with that lame BASIC?
I think you're missing the point of retro-computing.
Right?
To be frank, C64 basic wasn't that great, even back then. My first computer was a VZ 200, which predated the C64 (I think it was sold as a V-Tech 200 in the US? Here in Australia it was popular), and even it had a version of
basic
where you could draw lines and do graphics.
Commodore got a cheap deal on an earlier MS BASIC, then stuck with it
with the C64. It wasn?t as nice or capable as some BASICs even from the same era. But it ended up being less of a disaster than you might
think, because it practically forced people to learn assembly. A huge number of legendary programmers got their start because BASIC was too
slow or lacked features.
What a mess that was. Although there were other services offering Interne access, none had the marketing power that AOL had. Suddenly you had a flo of online noobs causing (unintended) havoc. I remember thinking that it w be a good idea to have people take some kind of test, something like Hams to do, to grant access to the Net. Nothing difficult, just the basic questions showing they had at least a working knowledge of how things work If they'd done that, I think we'd have a better class of users today.
for me, my school district is split in such a way that by high school i ha been in four different buildings and the jumps between them lined up quite perfectly:
grades 1-4 - those school macs
grades 5-6 - ibm ps/2 model 25
grades 7-8 - fully win95, pretty sure they were dell optiplex machines.
still required to buy floppy disks for storing schoolwork grades 9-12 - citrix winframe, our personalized desktop and storage 'roame
with our login, software access based on what classes we wer
in, etc
that's a pretty insane leap in technology..
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
Bo Holt wrote to Dr. What <=-
The not-too-smart jerks couldn't get on line.
Then along came AOL....
Oh, yeah. I would also throw Windows 95 in there with AOL.
You could get a nice TCP/IP stack for Win3.1. I think I used Netmanage Chameleon at that time.
But for a while it was back to the "smart/rude or nice" rule because the average person could not set up that software. Win95 made it easier for s but I believe that if it wasn't for AOL "opening up" the Internet, the vas majority of people wouldn't have made use of Win95's TCP/IP stack.
I wonder if there really were no AOL but still Windows 95 what would have happened. I've always blamed both of them, but I never considered Win95 w/out AOL.
In my opinion, Win95 would have happened regardless. AOL created the demand for Internet access.
Bo Holt wrote to Dr. What <=-
I wonder if there really were no AOL but still Windows 95 what would
have happened. I've always blamed both of them, but I never considered Win95 w/out AOL.
If Win95 came out but AOL stayed just an "island" (i.e. not opening up the Internet), we'd probably end up with the world we have now, but it would have taken longer to happen.
All this talk about AOL is very USA-centric. The rest of
the world is a much bigger place than USA.
If Win95 came out but AOL stayed just an "island" (i.e. not opening up the >>Internet), we'd probably end up with the world we have now, but it would have >>taken longer to happen.
All this talk about AOL is very USA-centric. The rest of
the world is a much bigger place than USA.
Well, it /is/ a US company so, yeah. However,
if you'd like to share stories about your online
service, feel free.
Mortar M. wrote to Kalevi Kolttonen <=-
Well, it /is/ a US company so, yeah. However, if you'd like to share stories about your online service, feel free.
In my opinion, Win95 would have happened regardless. AOL created the dema for Internet access.
If Win95 came out but AOL stayed just an "island" (i.e. not opening up the Internet), we'd probably end up with the world we have now, but it would h taken longer to happen.
... Dog for sale: eats anything and is fond of children
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52
Kalevi Kolttonen wrote to All <=-
As far as I can remember, here in Finland there
were several companies that offered Internet
access. I guess AOL had a major stake in USA,
so it was more important to you as a single company.
As far as I can remember, here in Finland thereHere in the US we also had other ISPs. In fact, "computer people" scoffed at AOL users LOL. We are not remembering AOL fondly here. Didn't AOL go international at some point in the 199s?
were several companies that offered Internet
access. I guess AOL had a major stake in USA,
so it was more important to you as a single company.
br,
KK
--- PyGate Linux v1.5.14
* Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
I never had AOL. I got an account with an ISP in the early 1990s so I could carry usenet groups on my BBS. That service is long gone, but I still have the same email account -- that came with my shell account -- from back then.
* SLMR 2.1a * This message written with recycled electrons.That's cool you still have the same address. I got my very first internet email address when I was 12 in 1993 from a local university where I use to audit computer classes. bo@elf.aum.edu. Elf is long gone with no successors.
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/107)
*Laugh* Nope. No way to avoid it.
Even toward the end, some BBSs were offering a limited Internet experience (Mostly Usenet and files).
But the trolls, spammers and "Me Too!" people were already on the BBSs.
AOL let all those "negative" people concentrate on one system that had no incentive to boot them off.
Most of those "negative" people had already been kicked off (or limited) o their local BBSs.
... Without my ignorance, your knowledge would be meaninglessOh yeah... I remember when BBSes started offering some Internet services. I was in high school and my BBS calls started dwindling... one of those things that I wish I could remember is the last time I ever called a BBS from those days until modern times. Of course in the 90s my car and girls started preoccupying a lot of my time during the transition, too LOL.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
Bo Holt wrote to Dr. What <=-
If Win95 came out but AOL stayed just an "island" (i.e. not opening up the Internet), we'd probably end up with the world we have now, but it would h taken longer to happen.
Ugh... No way to avoid it then LOL
Here in the US we also had other ISPs. In fact, "computer people" scoffed at AOL users LOL. We are not remembering AOL fondly here. Didn't AOL go international at some point in the 199s?
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 00:52:08 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
10 files (20,373K bytes) |
| Messages: | 264,186 |