1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. comp.programming

  • The Big List Of Naughty Strings

    From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to comp.programming on Thu Sep 4 01:19:26 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.programming

    The Big List of Naughty Strings is an evolving list of strings
    which have a high probability of causing issues when used as
    user-input data. This is intended for use in helping both automated
    and manual QA testing; useful for whenever your QA engineer walks
    into a bar.

    <https://github.com/minimaxir/big-list-of-naughty-strings>

    The rCLwalks into a barrCY reference is to this <http://www.sempf.net/post/On-Testing1>:

    QA Engineer walks into a bar. Orders a beer. Orders 0 beers. Orders
    999999999 beers. Orders a lizard. Orders -1 beers. Orders a
    sfdeljknesv.

    Because thatrCOs what testing is all about...
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to comp.programming on Thu Sep 4 01:21:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.programming

    On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 01:19:26 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:

    The rCLwalks into a barrCY reference is to this <http://www.sempf.net/post/On-Testing1>:

    QA Engineer walks into a bar. Orders a beer. Orders 0 beers. Orders
    999999999 beers. Orders a lizard. Orders -1 beers. Orders a
    sfdeljknesv.

    Because thatrCOs what testing is all about...

    Why did that suddenly come to mind? Because I just read about this
    incident where someone got the AI at a fast-food drive-through to
    accept an order for 18,000 cups of water <https://www.zdnet.com/article/someone-ordered-18000-cups-of-water-at-an-ai-drive-thru-now-fast-food-chains-are-reconsidering/>.

    Debugging actual human-written code is hard enough; how do you debug
    an AI?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2