1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. comp.os.linux.advocacy

  • Re: Voter ID Is racist But ID Requirement For Mamdani's Grocery Store is Not?

    From chine.bleu@chine.bleu@yahoo.com to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.os.linux.advocacy,talk.politics.guns on Sun Sep 27 23:41:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    Nosmo King wrote:
    On 8/5/26 10:08 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 8/5/2026 9:17 AM, Nosmo King wrote:
    On 8/5/26 7:35 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 13:29:46 -0400, Nosmo King <no@smoking.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/4/26 1:02 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
    On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 23:03:50 -0000 (UTC), pothead
    <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

    Voter ID is an 80/20, some say 90/10 issue, across party lines,
    so it's intriguing as to why the
    democrats and a handful of republicans are opposed to it.

    I don't know where you got your numbers from but I can smell the
    bullshit from here.

    Nah, that's just your breath.

    Doesn't change the fact that poohead's numbers are made up bullshit.

    Pew Research Center: 83% of U.S. adults favor requiring all voters to
    show government-issued photo identification to vote, compared to 16%
    opposed.

    Gallup: 84% support requiring photo identification at the voting place.

    Monmouth University: 80% support requiring photo ID to cast a ballot,
    with 18% opposed.


    Evidence?


    Pew, Gallup and Monmouth. Did you even read the post?


    So what. First explain what problem internal passports solve.
    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #777-000. Disavowed. Denied. @
    NO KINGS For I desire mercy not sacrifice. /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 5.5 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Governor Swill@governor.swill@gmail.com to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.os.linux.advocacy,talk.politics.guns on Mon Sep 28 22:44:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Sun, 27 Sep 2026 23:41:14 -0700, "chine.bleu"
    <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> pretending to be Spammy, posted some news:

    Nosmo King wrote:
    On 8/5/26 10:08 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 8/5/2026 9:17 AM, Nosmo King wrote:
    On 8/5/26 7:35 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 13:29:46 -0400, Nosmo King wrote:
    On 8/4/26 1:02 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
    On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 23:03:50 -0000 (UTC), pothead
    <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
    Voter ID is an 80/20, some say 90/10 issue, across party lines, >>>>>>>> so it's intriguing as to why the
    democrats and a handful of republicans are opposed to it.
    I don't know where you got your numbers from but I can smell the >>>>>>> bullshit from here.
    Nah, that's just your breath.
    Doesn't change the fact that poohead's numbers are made up bullshit. >>>> Pew Research Center: 83% of U.S. adults favor requiring all voters to
    show government-issued photo identification to vote, compared to 16%
    opposed.
    Gallup: 84% support requiring photo identification at the voting place. >>>> Monmouth University: 80% support requiring photo ID to cast a ballot,
    with 18% opposed.
    Evidence?

    Pew, Gallup and Monmouth. Did you even read the post?

    So what. First explain what problem internal passports solve.

    I don't have a problem with identifying myself at the polling place.

    None at all.

    And I will tell you what I tell anybody who cares, anybody not
    responsible enough to keep up appropriate ID in the 21st Century is
    not, imo, responsible enough to be trusted with the vote.
    --
    Another weird week..

    Xi Loves Me ... Not Edition

    <https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5I2RBGlX7IA>

    "embrace the suck".
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2