1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. comp.os.linux.advocacy

  • Re: I am now a disgruntled dissident in the United States. I encourage open warfare against the dictatorship, especially Donald J. Trump, invalid supreme leader

    From BobbieSellers@bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.invalid to alt.drugs.psychedelics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,talk.politics.guns on Sat Sep 26 16:56:41 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/25/26 15:35, pothead wrote:
    On 2026-06-25, BobbieSellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextremeinvalid.com> wrote:
    On 11/7/24 08:28, Scout wrote:


    "Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
    news:g8gnij1jaddmhan7mhfki4ojepffqsbmeo@4ax.com...
    Read topic.

    --
    Joel W. Crump

    Amendment XIV
    Section 1.

    [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
    abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
    United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
    life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
    nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
    protection of the laws.

    Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.-a States are
    liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

    Texas does not deny needed abortions.

    Then why are women dying when denied needed care.
    Some are quite young and others have families that will need
    a mother.

    The laws are badly written to ignore medical indication
    for pregnancy terminations when the fetus is already dead in
    the womb poisoning the woman and in other condition which
    threaten the life of the mother and her possible child.

    Desire to live and to care for the children you
    have already brought into the world is a valid reason
    for pregnancy termination.

    bliss - at 88 will never worry about personal denial of abortion

    Speaking for myself. if the mother's life is in imminent danger then
    every procedure necessary to save her life should be allowed by law.
    If the baby can be saved, great.
    If not, the woman's life comes first.

    Any law that prevents this is cruel and sick
    Does any state have such a law?

    YES! for details visit the URL below at Human Rights Watch:

    <https://www.hrw.org rC| news rC| 2026 rC| 03 rC| 06 rC| us-abortion-restrictions-causing-preventable-deaths>



    Secondly, if the fetus does not have a heartbeat then while I don't like
    it I support terminating the pregnancy. This would normally be very early in the pregnancy..

    Fetal death can happen at nearly any stage including during birth.>
    Other than that, abortion is murder of an innocent baby and sadly has become an industry and is being used as just another method of birth control.
    Baloney! Pregnancy termination is a medical procedure. It is not used as another method of birth control by the vast number of persons
    submitting to the procedure which in the USN Medical Corps I saw done frequently while I was on Taiwan in the 1950s. It was called "dilation
    and curettage" and it was done by USN Medical Officers, Surgeons by any description. They were caring for the wives of Service Members in the
    MAG. I was working as an HM3 to that point of my recollection is clear.

    Sorry Pothead from being so slow to respond but I just got
    around to reopening the Newsgroup on my computer. I have wide variations
    in my health at 89.

    bliss
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2