On 06 Aug 2026 00:46:55 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Aug 5, 2026 at 2:07:06rC>PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote <6a73a5fa$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On Aug 5, 2026 at 12:33:46rC>PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<115037g$39a1b$1@apd.eternal-september.org>:
On 05/08/2026 18:16, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2026-08-05, Apd wrote:
It wasn't intended to be aggressive, more a tongue-in-cheek
criticism,
but I suppose the AI can't really tell.
Apparently not... and, like I said, I've noticed these models
are on the 'woke' side so something like is likely to 'trigger'
it. It'd be interesting to do this on the way in to the db, in
it's own column. I'm not going to do it with 250,000+ posts but
I may do it at some point, possibly when I get a better computer
(hopefully I'll live that long ;)
For reference, 10 of your posts (in one of those runs) took 18
seconds.
Give each post a rating. If it were me, I'd down-score for too
much quoted text and x-posting to irrelevant groups.
We know how this will work: trolls will get a pass for making
insane accusations, and those of us who counter the accusations
will be told we are negative or making accusations or whatever.
I take it you've weighted it that way.
Yes... as based on the text in the prompt. It's easier for it to
make something closer to a binary decision than try to figure
out all kinds of 'motives' where there isn't any context, so the
prompt was possibly working too much against that.
Limited data in one post for much meaningful commentary.
[...] it's much better.
I agree. Did you see how it shifted Glasser's grading (and see
that insane hallucination?!!)? Not quite 97% (that *you* were OK
with ;).
Down to 49%. Surprising but a lot could be Peanut drivel which I
don't see.
Yeah... the focus will be on attacking me. I respond to attacks and
that will be deemed worse than the attacks themselves.
We do not need a database to know how Carroll will manipulate
things.
Side note: I have no clue what the 97% or 49% is talking about...
did not see those messages: but I know it will be tied to one of
Carroll's circuses.
Damn... I left out how Carroll will use a bunch of socks to try to
make it seem like he has more backing than he does. My bad.
So are all of these people Carroll socks as well?
You call me a Carroll sock snit.
Where is your proof?
It's just more of those "unquotable lies" you dwell on.
Right snit?
Let's see those receipts proving your sock claims.
It's trivial to show you socking up as Sigmond, tmelmosfire or dozens
of other socks you have used over the years.
So what say you?
On 07 Aug 2026 04:06:27 GMT
Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:
On 06 Aug 2026 00:46:55 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:I agree with the others. This Brock troll is a Usenet parasite who
Damn... I left out how Carroll will use a bunch of socks to try to
make it seem like he has more backing than he does. My bad.
So are all of these people Carroll socks as well?
You call me a Carroll sock snit.
Where is your proof?
It's just more of those "unquotable lies" you dwell on.
Right snit?
Let's see those receipts proving your sock claims.
It's trivial to show you socking up as Sigmond, tmelmosfire or dozens
of other socks you have used over the years.
So what say you?
serves no useful purpose to society. I ran his various persona's
through AI and the information that comes up is troubling to put it
mildly. From what I have read over the last day or two, he's not insane
but simply a crafty troll who hungers for attention. And when he
doesn't get it, he tends to make up shit in order to get a rise out of
those he is targeting.
My advice, at least for the short term is to send him to the bozo bin
and ignore his lies and knee jerk responses. That by itself will drive
a person like Brock batty because he thrives on attention. Good, bad or indifferent, any kind of attention satisfies his obsession.
that's my view of this troll and I acknowledge that other long term
Usenet posters know more about this Brock troll than I do so I defer to
them to fill in the blanks my opinions might have missed.
Happy trails!
On 07 Aug 2026 04:06:27 GMT
Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:
On 06 Aug 2026 00:46:55 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:I agree with the others. This Brock troll is a Usenet parasite who
On Aug 5, 2026 at 2:07:06rC>PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a73a5fa$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On Aug 5, 2026 at 12:33:46rC>PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<115037g$39a1b$1@apd.eternal-september.org>:
On 05/08/2026 18:16, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2026-08-05, Apd wrote:
It wasn't intended to be aggressive, more a tongue-in-cheek
criticism,
but I suppose the AI can't really tell.
Apparently not... and, like I said, I've noticed these models
are on the 'woke' side so something like is likely to 'trigger'
it. It'd be interesting to do this on the way in to the db, in
it's own column. I'm not going to do it with 250,000+ posts but
I may do it at some point, possibly when I get a better computer
(hopefully I'll live that long ;)
For reference, 10 of your posts (in one of those runs) took 18
seconds.
Give each post a rating. If it were me, I'd down-score for too
much quoted text and x-posting to irrelevant groups.
We know how this will work: trolls will get a pass for making
insane accusations, and those of us who counter the accusations
will be told we are negative or making accusations or whatever.
I take it you've weighted it that way.
Yes... as based on the text in the prompt. It's easier for it to
make something closer to a binary decision than try to figure
out all kinds of 'motives' where there isn't any context, so the
prompt was possibly working too much against that.
Limited data in one post for much meaningful commentary.
[...] it's much better.
I agree. Did you see how it shifted Glasser's grading (and see
that insane hallucination?!!)? Not quite 97% (that *you* were OK
with ;).
Down to 49%. Surprising but a lot could be Peanut drivel which I
don't see.
Yeah... the focus will be on attacking me. I respond to attacks and
that will be deemed worse than the attacks themselves.
We do not need a database to know how Carroll will manipulate
things.
Side note: I have no clue what the 97% or 49% is talking about...
did not see those messages: but I know it will be tied to one of
Carroll's circuses.
Damn... I left out how Carroll will use a bunch of socks to try to
make it seem like he has more backing than he does. My bad.
So are all of these people Carroll socks as well?
You call me a Carroll sock snit.
Where is your proof?
It's just more of those "unquotable lies" you dwell on.
Right snit?
Let's see those receipts proving your sock claims.
It's trivial to show you socking up as Sigmond, tmelmosfire or dozens
of other socks you have used over the years.
So what say you?
serves no useful purpose to society. I ran his various persona's
through AI and the information that comes up is troubling to put it
mildly. From what I have read over the last day or two, he's not insane
but simply a crafty troll who hungers for attention. And when he
doesn't get it, he tends to make up shit in order to get a rise out of
those he is targeting.
My advice, at least for the short term is to send him to the bozo bin
and ignore his lies and knee jerk responses. That by itself will drive
a person like Brock batty because he thrives on attention. Good, bad or indifferent, any kind of attention satisfies his obsession.
that's my view of this troll and I acknowledge that other long term
Usenet posters know more about this Brock troll than I do so I defer to
them to fill in the blanks my opinions might have missed.
Happy trails!
On 8/7/2026 3:50 PM, Niclas LeYam wrote:
On 07 Aug 2026 04:06:27 GMT
Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:
On 06 Aug 2026 00:46:55 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:I agree with the others. This Brock troll is a Usenet parasite who
Damn... I left out how Carroll will use a bunch of socks to try to
make it seem like he has more backing than he does. My bad.
So are all of these people Carroll socks as well?
You call me a Carroll sock snit.
Where is your proof?
It's just more of those "unquotable lies" you dwell on.
Right snit?
Let's see those receipts proving your sock claims.
It's trivial to show you socking up as Sigmond, tmelmosfire or dozens
of other socks you have used over the years.
So what say you?
serves no useful purpose to society. I ran his various persona's
through AI and the information that comes up is troubling to put it
mildly. From what I have read over the last day or two, he's not insane
but simply a crafty troll who hungers for attention. And when he
doesn't get it, he tends to make up shit in order to get a rise out of
those he is targeting.
My advice, at least for the short term is to send him to the bozo bin
and ignore his lies and knee jerk responses. That by itself will drive
a person like Brock batty because he thrives on attention. Good, bad or
indifferent, any kind of attention satisfies his obsession.
that's my view of this troll and I acknowledge that other long term
Usenet posters know more about this Brock troll than I do so I defer to
them to fill in the blanks my opinions might have missed.
Happy trails!
You are transparently a sock.
Joel W. Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/7/2026 3:50 PM, Niclas LeYam wrote:
On 07 Aug 2026 04:06:27 GMT
Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:
On 06 Aug 2026 00:46:55 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:I agree with the others. This Brock troll is a Usenet parasite who
Damn... I left out how Carroll will use a bunch of socks to try to
make it seem like he has more backing than he does. My bad.
So are all of these people Carroll socks as well?
You call me a Carroll sock snit.
Where is your proof?
It's just more of those "unquotable lies" you dwell on.
Right snit?
Let's see those receipts proving your sock claims.
It's trivial to show you socking up as Sigmond, tmelmosfire or dozens
of other socks you have used over the years.
So what say you?
serves no useful purpose to society. I ran his various persona's
through AI and the information that comes up is troubling to put it
mildly. From what I have read over the last day or two, he's not insane
but simply a crafty troll who hungers for attention. And when he
doesn't get it, he tends to make up shit in order to get a rise out of
those he is targeting.
My advice, at least for the short term is to send him to the bozo bin
and ignore his lies and knee jerk responses. That by itself will drive
a person like Brock batty because he thrives on attention. Good, bad or
indifferent, any kind of attention satisfies his obsession.
that's my view of this troll and I acknowledge that other long term
Usenet posters know more about this Brock troll than I do so I defer to
them to fill in the blanks my opinions might have missed.
Happy trails!
You are transparently a sock.
As predicted. CarrollrCOs lies have been blown apart by his own push. The .gov site proves no plea bargain. No breaking a restraining order. No such order ever existed. No driving without insurance. No business without a license. Carroll and Gremlin and Pothead and other trolls all dogpiled rCo too stupid to know they were proving me right.
CarrollrCOs smarter than some. He wonrCOt discuss his lies. HerCOll pivot to new
ones and a plethora of socks will flood the conversation.
Every time.
Like clockwork.
And herCOll play victim.
On 8/8/2026 12:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Joel W. Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/7/2026 3:50 PM, Niclas LeYam wrote:
On 07 Aug 2026 04:06:27 GMT
Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:
On 06 Aug 2026 00:46:55 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:I agree with the others. This Brock troll is a Usenet parasite who
Damn... I left out how Carroll will use a bunch of socks to try to >>>>>> make it seem like he has more backing than he does. My bad.
So are all of these people Carroll socks as well?
You call me a Carroll sock snit.
Where is your proof?
It's just more of those "unquotable lies" you dwell on.
Right snit?
Let's see those receipts proving your sock claims.
It's trivial to show you socking up as Sigmond, tmelmosfire or dozens >>>>> of other socks you have used over the years.
So what say you?
serves no useful purpose to society. I ran his various persona's
through AI and the information that comes up is troubling to put it
mildly. From what I have read over the last day or two, he's not insane >>>> but simply a crafty troll who hungers for attention. And when he
doesn't get it, he tends to make up shit in order to get a rise out of >>>> those he is targeting.
My advice, at least for the short term is to send him to the bozo bin
and ignore his lies and knee jerk responses. That by itself will drive >>>> a person like Brock batty because he thrives on attention. Good, bad or >>>> indifferent, any kind of attention satisfies his obsession.
that's my view of this troll and I acknowledge that other long term
Usenet posters know more about this Brock troll than I do so I defer to >>>> them to fill in the blanks my opinions might have missed.
Happy trails!
You are transparently a sock.
As predicted. CarrollrCOs lies have been blown apart by his own push. The
.gov site proves no plea bargain. No breaking a restraining order. No such >> order ever existed. No driving without insurance. No business without a
license. Carroll and Gremlin and Pothead and other trolls all dogpiled rCo >> too stupid to know they were proving me right.
CarrollrCOs smarter than some. He wonrCOt discuss his lies. HerCOll pivot to new
ones and a plethora of socks will flood the conversation.
Every time.
Like clockwork.
And herCOll play victim.
I'm on Team Snit.
I'm on Team Snit.
I am on team equal rights and evidence. The trolls fight against that -- not really me.
On 8/8/2026 12:57 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
I'm on Team Snit.
I am on team equal rights and evidence. The trolls fight against that -- not >> really me.
Agreed, but in this Usenet war, I'm on your team. I am sick of the trolls/socks defaming you.
I'm on Team Snit.
I am on team equal rights and evidence. The trolls fight against that -- not
really me.
Agreed, but in this Usenet war, I'm on your team. I am sick of the
trolls/socks defaming you.
Fair.
I am sick of it, too. And they are getting more extreme. Now they have pulled my ex into it... but they are too stupid to realize that any record they show from her being on the .gov site proves their claims about records timing out is a lie.
This is one of the biggest examples of tribalism I have seen online... and while I enjoy them proving I am right about that, I do not appreciate being their target. I appreciate you supporting facts (and this siding with me).
On 8/8/2026 12:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Joel W. Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/7/2026 3:50 PM, Niclas LeYam wrote:
On 07 Aug 2026 04:06:27 GMT
Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:
On 06 Aug 2026 00:46:55 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:I agree with the others. This Brock troll is a Usenet parasite who
Damn... I left out how Carroll will use a bunch of socks to try to >>>>> make it seem like he has more backing than he does. My bad.
So are all of these people Carroll socks as well?
You call me a Carroll sock snit.
Where is your proof?
It's just more of those "unquotable lies" you dwell on.
Right snit?
Let's see those receipts proving your sock claims.
It's trivial to show you socking up as Sigmond, tmelmosfire or dozens >>>> of other socks you have used over the years.
So what say you?
serves no useful purpose to society. I ran his various persona's
through AI and the information that comes up is troubling to put it
mildly. From what I have read over the last day or two, he's not insane >>> but simply a crafty troll who hungers for attention. And when he
doesn't get it, he tends to make up shit in order to get a rise out of >>> those he is targeting.
My advice, at least for the short term is to send him to the bozo bin
and ignore his lies and knee jerk responses. That by itself will drive >>> a person like Brock batty because he thrives on attention. Good, bad or >>> indifferent, any kind of attention satisfies his obsession.
that's my view of this troll and I acknowledge that other long term
Usenet posters know more about this Brock troll than I do so I defer to >>> them to fill in the blanks my opinions might have missed.
Happy trails!
You are transparently a sock.
As predicted. Carroll?s lies have been blown apart by his own push. The .gov site proves no plea bargain. No breaking a restraining order. No such order ever existed. No driving without insurance. No business without a license. Carroll and Gremlin and Pothead and other trolls all dogpiled ? too stupid to know they were proving me right.
Carroll?s smarter than some. He won?t discuss his lies. He?ll pivot to new ones and a plethora of socks will flood the conversation.
Every time.
Like clockwork.
And he?ll play victim.
I'm on Team Snit.
On 8/8/2026 12:57 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
I'm on Team Snit.
I am on team equal rights and evidence. The trolls fight against that -- not
really me.
Agreed, but in this Usenet war, I'm on your team. I am sick of the trolls/socks defaming you.
On Aug 7, 2026 at 10:05:00aPM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <1156dds$17lqu$1@dont-email.me>:
On 8/8/2026 12:57 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
I'm on Team Snit.
I am on team equal rights and evidence. The trolls fight against that -- not
really me.
Agreed, but in this Usenet war, I'm on your team. I am sick of the trolls/socks defaming you.
Fair.
I am sick of it, too. And they are getting more extreme. Now they have pulled my ex into it... but they are too stupid to realize that any record they show from her being on the .gov site proves their claims about records timing out is a lie.
This is one of the biggest examples of tribalism I have seen online... and while I enjoy them proving I am right about that, I do not appreciate being their target. I appreciate you supporting facts (and this siding with me).
On 8/8/2026 2:22 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
I'm on Team Snit.
I am on team equal rights and evidence. The trolls fight against that -- not
really me.
Agreed, but in this Usenet war, I'm on your team. I am sick of the
trolls/socks defaming you.
Fair.
I am sick of it, too. And they are getting more extreme. Now they have pulled
my ex into it... but they are too stupid to realize that any record they show
from her being on the .gov site proves their claims about records timing out
is a lie.
This is one of the biggest examples of tribalism I have seen online... and while I enjoy them proving I am right about that, I do not appreciate being their target. I appreciate you supporting facts (and this siding with me).
I stand with anyone who's sane - it includes Alan, for example. He and
I disagree a lot, but he's a good dude. I'd take you and him over
chrisv, all day long.
In article <6a76cb30$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Aug 7, 2026 at 10:05:00 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<1156dds$17lqu$1@dont-email.me>:
On 8/8/2026 12:57 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
I'm on Team Snit.
I am on team equal rights and evidence. The trolls fight against that -- not
really me.
Agreed, but in this Usenet war, I'm on your team. I am sick of the
trolls/socks defaming you.
Fair.
I am sick of it, too. And they are getting more extreme. Now they have pulled
my ex into it... but they are too stupid to realize that any record they show
from her being on the .gov site proves their claims about records timing out >> is a lie.
This is one of the biggest examples of tribalism I have seen online... and >> while I enjoy them proving I am right about that, I do not appreciate being >> their target. I appreciate you supporting facts (and this siding with me).
Snits sock is his only friend. Snit is melting down.--
In article <1156dds$17lqu$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 8/8/2026 12:57 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
I'm on Team Snit.
I am on team equal rights and evidence. The trolls fight against that -- not
really me.
Agreed, but in this Usenet war, I'm on your team. I am sick of the
trolls/socks defaming you.
Faggots are sick deranged people.--
In article <1156ccj$17dde$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 8/8/2026 12:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Joel W. Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/7/2026 3:50 PM, Niclas LeYam wrote:
On 07 Aug 2026 04:06:27 GMT
Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:
On 06 Aug 2026 00:46:55 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:I agree with the others. This Brock troll is a Usenet parasite who
Damn... I left out how Carroll will use a bunch of socks to try to >>>>>>> make it seem like he has more backing than he does. My bad.
So are all of these people Carroll socks as well?
You call me a Carroll sock snit.
Where is your proof?
It's just more of those "unquotable lies" you dwell on.
Right snit?
Let's see those receipts proving your sock claims.
It's trivial to show you socking up as Sigmond, tmelmosfire or dozens >>>>>> of other socks you have used over the years.
So what say you?
serves no useful purpose to society. I ran his various persona's
through AI and the information that comes up is troubling to put it
mildly. From what I have read over the last day or two, he's not insane >>>>> but simply a crafty troll who hungers for attention. And when he
doesn't get it, he tends to make up shit in order to get a rise out of >>>>> those he is targeting.
My advice, at least for the short term is to send him to the bozo bin >>>>> and ignore his lies and knee jerk responses. That by itself will drive >>>>> a person like Brock batty because he thrives on attention. Good, bad or >>>>> indifferent, any kind of attention satisfies his obsession.
that's my view of this troll and I acknowledge that other long term
Usenet posters know more about this Brock troll than I do so I defer to >>>>> them to fill in the blanks my opinions might have missed.
Happy trails!
You are transparently a sock.
As predicted. Carroll?s lies have been blown apart by his own push. The
.gov site proves no plea bargain. No breaking a restraining order. No such >>> order ever existed. No driving without insurance. No business without a
license. Carroll and Gremlin and Pothead and other trolls all dogpiled ? >>> too stupid to know they were proving me right.
Carroll?s smarter than some. He won?t discuss his lies. He?ll pivot to new >>> ones and a plethora of socks will flood the conversation.
Every time.
Like clockwork.
And he?ll play victim.
I'm on Team Snit.
Talking to yourself? Not a good look for you.--
On Aug 8, 2026 at 8:33:42rC>AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.44e0fa3d872b972e98cea1@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a76cb30$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Aug 7, 2026 at 10:05:00 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<1156dds$17lqu$1@dont-email.me>:
On 8/8/2026 12:57 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
I'm on Team Snit.
I am on team equal rights and evidence. The trolls fight against that -- not
really me.
Agreed, but in this Usenet war, I'm on your team. I am sick of the
trolls/socks defaming you.
Fair.
I am sick of it, too. And they are getting more extreme. Now they have pulled
my ex into it... but they are too stupid to realize that any record they show
from her being on the .gov site proves their claims about records timing out
is a lie.
This is one of the biggest examples of tribalism I have seen online... and >>> while I enjoy them proving I am right about that, I do not appreciate being >>> their target. I appreciate you supporting facts (and this siding with me).
You ignored this to troll.
Snits sock is his only friend. Snit is melting down.
On 8/8/2026 2:22 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
I'm on Team Snit.
I am on team equal rights and evidence. The trolls fight against that -- not
really me.
Agreed, but in this Usenet war, I'm on your team. I am sick of the
trolls/socks defaming you.
Fair.
I am sick of it, too. And they are getting more extreme. Now they have pulled
my ex into it... but they are too stupid to realize that any record they show
from her being on the .gov site proves their claims about records timing out >> is a lie.
This is one of the biggest examples of tribalism I have seen online... and >> while I enjoy them proving I am right about that, I do not appreciate being >> their target. I appreciate you supporting facts (and this siding with me).
I stand with anyone who's sane - it includes Alan, for example. He and
I disagree a lot, but he's a good dude. I'd take you and him over
chrisv, all day long.
On 8/8/2026 2:51 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Aug 8, 2026 at 8:33:42rC>AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.44e0fa3d872b972e98cea1@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a76cb30$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,You ignored this to troll.
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Aug 7, 2026 at 10:05:00 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<1156dds$17lqu$1@dont-email.me>:
On 8/8/2026 12:57 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
I'm on Team Snit.
I am on team equal rights and evidence. The trolls fight against that -- not
really me.
Agreed, but in this Usenet war, I'm on your team. I am sick of the
trolls/socks defaming you.
Fair.
I am sick of it, too. And they are getting more extreme. Now they have pulled
my ex into it... but they are too stupid to realize that any record they show
from her being on the .gov site proves their claims about records timing out
is a lie.
This is one of the biggest examples of tribalism I have seen online... and >>>> while I enjoy them proving I am right about that, I do not appreciate being
their target. I appreciate you supporting facts (and this siding with me). >>
Snits sock is his only friend. Snit is melting down.
I'm not Michael's "sock", you fucktarded stoner redneck brain-dead
moron, I'm a person who sees Michael as one of the posters with class.
On Aug 8, 2026 at 8:33:42aAM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.44e0fa3d872b972e98cea1@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a76cb30$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Aug 7, 2026 at 10:05:00 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<1156dds$17lqu$1@dont-email.me>:
On 8/8/2026 12:57 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
I'm on Team Snit.
I am on team equal rights and evidence. The trolls fight against that -- not
really me.
Agreed, but in this Usenet war, I'm on your team. I am sick of the
trolls/socks defaming you.
Fair.
I am sick of it, too. And they are getting more extreme. Now they have pulled
my ex into it... but they are too stupid to realize that any record they show
from her being on the .gov site proves their claims about records timing out
is a lie.
This is one of the biggest examples of tribalism I have seen online... and >> while I enjoy them proving I am right about that, I do not appreciate being
their target. I appreciate you supporting facts (and this siding with me).
You ignored this to troll.
Snits sock is his only friend. Snit is melting down.
On 8/8/2026 2:51 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Aug 8, 2026 at 8:33:42aAM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.44e0fa3d872b972e98cea1@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a76cb30$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Aug 7, 2026 at 10:05:00 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<1156dds$17lqu$1@dont-email.me>:
On 8/8/2026 12:57 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
I'm on Team Snit.
I am on team equal rights and evidence. The trolls fight against that -- not
really me.
Agreed, but in this Usenet war, I'm on your team. I am sick of the
trolls/socks defaming you.
Fair.
I am sick of it, too. And they are getting more extreme. Now they have pulled
my ex into it... but they are too stupid to realize that any record they show
from her being on the .gov site proves their claims about records timing out
is a lie.
This is one of the biggest examples of tribalism I have seen online... and
while I enjoy them proving I am right about that, I do not appreciate being
their target. I appreciate you supporting facts (and this siding with me).
You ignored this to troll.
Snits sock is his only friend. Snit is melting down.
I'm not Michael's "sock", you fucktarded stoner redneck brain-dead
moron, I'm a person who sees Michael as one of the posters with class.
On Aug 8, 2026 at 11:57:04aAM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <1157u60$1okka$1@dont-email.me>:
On 8/8/2026 2:51 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Aug 8, 2026 at 8:33:42aAM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.44e0fa3d872b972e98cea1@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a76cb30$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Aug 7, 2026 at 10:05:00 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<1156dds$17lqu$1@dont-email.me>:
On 8/8/2026 12:57 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
I'm on Team Snit.
I am on team equal rights and evidence. The trolls fight against that -- not
really me.
Agreed, but in this Usenet war, I'm on your team. I am sick of the >>>>> trolls/socks defaming you.
Fair.
I am sick of it, too. And they are getting more extreme. Now they have pulled
my ex into it... but they are too stupid to realize that any record they show
from her being on the .gov site proves their claims about records timing out
is a lie.
This is one of the biggest examples of tribalism I have seen online... and
while I enjoy them proving I am right about that, I do not appreciate being
their target. I appreciate you supporting facts (and this siding with me).
You ignored this to troll.
Snits sock is his only friend. Snit is melting down.
I'm not Michael's "sock", you fucktarded stoner redneck brain-dead
moron, I'm a person who sees Michael as one of the posters with class.
Thank you.
On Aug 7, 2026 at 11:30:53aPM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <1156iet$18ta5$1@dont-email.me>:
On 8/8/2026 2:22 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
I'm on Team Snit.
I am on team equal rights and evidence. The trolls fight against that -- not
really me.
Agreed, but in this Usenet war, I'm on your team. I am sick of the
trolls/socks defaming you.
Fair.
I am sick of it, too. And they are getting more extreme. Now they have pulled
my ex into it... but they are too stupid to realize that any record they show
from her being on the .gov site proves their claims about records timing out
is a lie.
This is one of the biggest examples of tribalism I have seen online... and >> while I enjoy them proving I am right about that, I do not appreciate being
their target. I appreciate you supporting facts (and this siding with me).
I stand with anyone who's sane - it includes Alan, for example. He and
I disagree a lot, but he's a good dude. I'd take you and him over
chrisv, all day long.
He seems a good person even if he disagrees with me.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 54:38:49 |
| Calls: | 1,101 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 1,339 |
| Messages: | 276,321 |