• Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force White Christian Conservative Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy

    From c186282@c186282@nnada.ne to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.os.linux.advocacy,or.politics,talk.politics.guns on Sat May 16 18:30:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    zendejo wrote:

    On 5/15/26 5:08 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On May 15, 2026 at 2:01:09rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote
    <6a078995$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

    On 5/15/26 9:41 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 5/15/2026 11:20 AM, zendejo wrote:
    On 5/15/26 1:38 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 5/15/2026 12:30 AM, zendejo wrote:
    On 5/14/26 5:56 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 5/14/2026 7:30 PM, zendejo wrote:
    On 5/14/26 4:48 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 5/14/2026 6:32 PM, zendejo wrote:

    I read back through his poasts and they are all very trans >>>>>>>>>>> focused.

    He even has a hot trans model he's infatuated with.

    That lifestyle generally includes lots of anal sex.

    I am in love with a trans woman, she is a top, and I am a
    bottom.

    Yes, so?

    It reflects her sane decision not to have her balls cut off and >>>>>>>> her dick sliced like a Five Guys hot dog, to be formed into
    something resembling a vagina, as well as my liking dick up my >>>>>>>> ass.

    Sounds like two gay guys doing non surgical dress up.

    She isn't a guy.

    "She" most certainly came out of the womb as one.


    This would be why they say "assigned male at birth", at that stage of
    development there's nothing to indicate they're transgender.

    A state of surgical and hormonal drugs alteration from "as born".


    There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's >>>>>>>>>> hetero sex that does the same activity that gay-male sex would >>>>>>>>>> be.

    You're making up your own definitions again.

    It is not "hetero sex".

    "Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic
    attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of >>>>>>>>> the opposite sex or gender."

    She is a female with a male body, it's hetero.

    No.

    She is a male with a synthetic hormone fueled pseudo-female body. >>>>>>
    She hasn't taken the hormones. She's gorgeous while being
    basically all natural.

    Most men can't push out large breasts like that, implants then?


    Yes, collagen. They look remarkably real, though.

    Agreed.

    But fake is fake.

    Trans fake is still fake.

    What is "trans fake"?

    A pale imitation of the surgical capon, with the intention to deceive
    both man and God.


    HOMOSEXUALITY IS A RIGHT WING DECISION.





    Only a week ago, Trump boasted he didn't need the help of foreign allies, claiming the war was aready WON!

    Donald Trump launched a reckless war on Iran out of arrogance, destabilised the global economy and is now demanding Nato risk their soldiers' lives to clean up the mess he created

    Trump launched his war on Iran in a haze of arrogance and delusion.

    Still drunk on the dramatic capture of Venezuelan strongman Nicola|s
    Maduro, the US president convinced himself he had discovered a foolproof formula for remaking the world: strike hard, topple the dictator and
    declare victory. It was the kind of simplistic bravado that might win
    applause at a MAGA rally. As a strategy for global security, it is proving reckless beyond belief.

    Now the consequences of his ego are crashing down on the world economy.
    What Trump unleashed on February 28 was not just another Middle East intervention. It was a war beside the Strait of Hormuz - the narrow
    maritime corridor through which roughly a fifth of the world's oil supply flows.

    For decades, American presidents acutely understood that a conflict there could ignite a global economic shock. It was why they avoided war at all costs. But as the world now sees, not only did Trump ignore those warnings,
    he was the only president, some say, stupid enough not to understand the fallout his actions would cause.

    Today, the nightmare scenario is unfolding.

    Iran has retaliated by disrupting shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, halting tanker traffic and sending shockwaves through energy markets. Oil prices are surging. Shipping insurance costs have exploded. Governments
    across the world are scrambling to protect their economies from a crisis
    that now threatens global trade.

    In other words, while Trump's administration boasts about destroying
    Iranian warships and striking thousands of targets, Tehran has retaliated
    in the most devastating way possible - by choking the artery through which
    the world's energy flows.

    The United States may have sank Iran's navy. But Trump's war has torpedoed
    the stability of the global economy. And now the president who swaggered
    into the conflict, claiming he did not need anyone's help, is suddenly demanding that others rescue him. In an extraordinary overnight warning,
    Trump has told Nato allies that the alliance faces a "very bad" future
    unless they send warships to escort tankers through the Strait of Hormuz.
    Bulk carrier 'Mayuree Naree' near the Strait of Hormuz after an attack
    View 4 Images

    Iran is effectively holding the Middle East hostage after closing off the Straits of Hormuz (Image: ROYAL THAI NAVY/AFP via Getty Im)

    The whiplash is astonishing.

    Only days ago, Trump was boasting that the war had already been won. Iran's military, he said, had been crushed in the opening hours. America, he declared, did not need anyone else. Now he is calling on Britain, France
    and other allies to join the fight - to patrol the Gulf, to protect
    shipping and potentially to risk the lives of their own sailors and
    soldiers.

    It raises a brutal question. Why should the sons and daughters of other nations spill their blood for a war they never asked for? This was not a
    Nato decision. It was not the result of international consensus or
    collective defence. It was a unilateral gamble by Trump, egged on by
    Benjamin Netanyahu.

    For decades, strategists warned that attacking Iran risked exactly this scenario. Iran could not defeat the United States in a conventional
    military confrontation. But it could weaponise geography. The Strait of
    Hormuz is barely 20 miles wide at its narrowest point. Every day, tankers carrying oil from Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar and the UAE pass
    through it.

    Disrupt that corridor, and the consequences ripple across the entire world economy. That is precisely what Iran is now doing. Trump either ignored the danger or simply believed brute force would make it irrelevant. Flush with confidence after the dramatic capture of Maduro in Venezuela, he convinced himself another regime could be toppled just as easily.

    But Iran is not Venezuela. It is a hardened regional power that has
    survived decades of sanctions, covert attacks and military pressure.
    Instead of collapsing, it has struck back where the world is most
    vulnerable.

    And now the president who declared victory in the first hour is discovering that wars do not end with slogans.

    Even America's closest allies are reluctant to follow him further into the conflict. Countries from Japan to Australia, including ourselves, have responded cautiously to calls for naval deployments, wary of being dragged into a widening war.

    The hesitation is entirely understandable. This crisis was not created
    through collective decision-making. It was triggered by the ego and the
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Stephen Miller@un-americans@trump.org to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.os.linux.advocacy,or.politics,talk.politics.guns on Sat May 16 21:30:31 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy


    Data Finds Republicans are Obsessed with Searching for Transgender Porn
    Home + Data Finds Republicans are Obsessed with Searching for Transgender
    Porn

    1:51 am By Kelsey
    Closet Cases u Republicans secretly love what they publicly hate

    So far in 2022, more than 300 anti-LGBT bills have been proposed across 36 states u at least one third of which are directed at trans youth. This
    surge, especially in anti-trans legislation from Republicans, stands in
    stark contrast to a startling fact.

    Republicans love transgender porn, A LOT.

    With more than 4.7 Million transgender porn related Google searches each
    month (per Ahrefs. com), do Republicans represent those searching most? The answer seems to be a clear YES.
    Search Popularity by metro area for the keyword "Femboy"

    In fact, the more Republican they are, the more they seem to like it. (see below)

    To understand the Republicans' love for transgender related porn, we
    scraped daily Google search trend data from June 1, 2022 to June 19, 2022, segmented by DMA (metro area) and compared search volume to both 2020
    election voting trends, and public opinions about LGBT rights.

    The data tells a tragic tale of self-loathing closet cases, Republicans who privately get off sexually to trans folks, while publicly trying to remove trans peoples' rights and stoking hate against them.

    Lets get into it...

    Who is Most Obsessed With Searching for Trans Porn?


    The More Red You Get, The More You Love Trans Porn

    While the maps and rankings might make it seem obvious that there's a correlation between conservatism and searching for transgender porn, but by plotting linear regression trend lines, we can better understand the
    strength of the correlation. In these views, we look at search volume for three different keyword groups vs metro area political leaning. Each dot represents a metro area. Dots are colored their ratio of Democratic vs. Republican votes in the 2020 presidential election. The higher the value
    (more red), the higher the percentage of that metro area voted for Donald Trump.
    Data suggests that the more "Republican" (based on 2020 Presidential voting data) a metro area is, the more that area searches for transgender related porn.

    Below you can find the linear regression test values. While this data has
    low Rsquared values, our P-values show that even this noisy, high-
    variability data can have a significant trend. The trend indicates that the predictor variable (political leaning) still provides information about the response (transgender search popularity) even though data points fall
    further from the regression line. For all keywords we investigated, P-
    values were significant, allowing us to reject the Null Hypothesis. Thus, there is a statistically significant correlation between being more republican, and trans porn search volume, grouped by DMA.
    "Shemale" Linear Regression Values
    "Tranny" Linear Regression Values
    "Femboy" Linear Regression Values

    R-squared: .0669668
    T-Value: 3.81706
    P-Value: .0001793

    R-squared: .0326781
    T-Value: 2.61873
    P-Value: .0094915

    R-squared: .0401511
    T-Value: 2.91404
    P-Value: .003968

    The More You Hate Them, The More You Love Them
    By adding survey data from PRRI. org, (Opinion on businesses being allowed
    to discriminate against LGBT patrons), we see a similar correlation that indicates those with stronger anti-LGBT feelings tend to search more for transgender porn.

    While political leaning is an interesting way to understand the trends in
    this data, we wanted to better compare search volume data with more direct local estimations of prejudice.

    To accomplish this, we looked at data from ava. prri. org, an organization that surveys 50,000 Americans annually across 30 metro areas every year on social and religious opinions. One question they ask is "Do you support religiously based refusals to serve gay and lesbian people? " Respondents could answer "Favor, " "Oppose, " or "Don't Know/Not Sure. "

    We felt this survey question was a decent proxy for baseline LGBT
    prejudice, though we recognize some may support the question on Libertarian
    or Personal freedom grounds that do not have to do with the specific demographics of others.

    Our statistical trend lines again show a correlation, this time with higher R-squared and P-values than when looking strictly at voting data.

    Linear regression values for this view:

    R-squared: .0842313
    T-Value: 2.24918
    P-Value: .028525

    Methodology and Limitations

    Raw data and data visualizations can be reviewed here.

    Google Trends:

    All search volume data came from Google trends. Daily hourly trends data by DMA (Metro Area) was collected from June 1, 2022 to June 19, 2022. Because
    the data was pulled by hour, aggregate values will likely not match what
    you see on trends. google. com because the web interface shows daily (not hourly) totals. Hourly data was acquired programmatically using PyTrends
    for each day in the range. It should be noted that data from Google Trends
    is on a 1-100 "popularity score" scale which is a comparative score of all 200+ DMAs for which Google Trends provides data. The values in the dataset reflect aggregations of this popularity score, not raw search counts (which Google does not provide).

    American Values Atlas:

    The American Values Atlas draws upon 50,000 annual telephone interviews
    among a random sample of Americans to deliver an unprecedented level of
    detail about the United States' cultural and religious landscape. With its large sample size, the AVA provides a rare look at the profiles of smaller religious communities, such as Jews, Muslims, Mormons, Hindus, Buddhists,
    and others, who are often omitted from depictions of the country's
    religious population. The AVA's scope also allows its users to explore the increasing diversity of specific regions, all 50 states, and 30 major metropolitan areas.


    https://lawsuit.org/general-law/republicans-have-an-obsession-with- transgender-pornography/

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2