In article <6a00f890$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:06:23 PM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510150623.2c65133b@z-z>:
On 10 May 2026 18:08:12 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 10, 2026 at 9:57:33 AM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510105733.0cded532@z-z>:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
Redheads are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
Of course they are:
AI Overview
Naturally red hair is rare, occurring in only
1?2% of the global population. It is most common in individuals with
Northern or Northwestern European ancestry, where the prevalence
increases to 2?6%.
They are uncommon. Sure. Just like folks in the LGBTQ+ community.
"uncommon" is being nice.
I do not have red hair. I think redheads should
not be belittled for having red hair.
And yet the English are famous for doing that.
I do not back that.
They don't care and they outnumber you.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
Keep in mind that nature is not restricted to a simple binary just to
make some people more comfortable.
Nature isn't brewing these trans cocktails.
Nature is not limited to the binary you can handle. Are brunettes blonde or >> brunette in your world?
Women or men ones?
--
But...if we're heading for a global crisis and population collapse
having less breeders may be part of the larger plan.
In article <6a00f8e4$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:08:39 PM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510150839.54ea3ddb@z-z>:
On 10 May 2026 18:42:05 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 10, 2026 at 11:07:18 AM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510120718.28052f2c@z-z>:
On 10 May 2026 18:04:58 GMT
Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
Eldon Chance <nospam@in.valid> wrote:
On 09 May 2026 23:08:45 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34290981
Now that is "normal" but also geographically isolated
hermaphrodism of a sort.
"When Imperato-McGinley investigated the Guevedoces she discovered >>>>>>> the reason they don't have male genitalia when they are born is
because they are deficient in an enzyme called 5-alpha-reductase, >>>>>>> which normally converts testosterone into dihydro-testosterone.
This deficiency seems to be a genetic condition, quite common in >>>>>>> this part of the Dominican Republic, but vanishingly rare
elsewhere."
By any common measure however it is a genetic miscue, albeit one >>>>>>> that has inspired "treatment'.
Ok.
People who don?t fit the more common binary are about as rare as
redheads. We should not criticize redheads or ask them to hide who >>>>>> they are. We should not mock redheads or act like they?re somehow
broken.
Yet we do...
No. You might... "we" do not.
Societal we - prevalent in the UK:
AI Overview
"Gingerism" is a documented form of prejudice
and bullying in the UK, where people with red hair are teased or
harassed, sometimes dismissed as harmless "banter" but often considered
a form of social bullying. It is a long-standing stereotype, with
redheads often facing derogatory nicknames like "carrot tops" or jokes
about having "no soul".Key details regarding this phenomenon:Cultural
Context: While and Ireland have the highest concentrations of red hair,
they also have a history of stigmatizing it.Impact: A 2014 study
indicated that over 90% of men with red hair in the UK reported being
targeted by bullying.Nature of Bullying: Jokes often stem from
stereotypes, with some observers arguing it is the "last socially
acceptable form of bullying".Discrimination Debate: Some advocacy
groups, like the Anti-Bullying Alliance, have discussed whether this,
at its worst, should be categorized as a hate crime, though this is
debated.Changing Views: Although still prevalent, some feel that
attitudes are gradually changing.This type of discrimination is often
seen as a form of "othering," as red hair is a distinct, uncommon
minority trait.
There are bigots against any group with a small percentage of the population.
Good point.
Butt fucker learned a new word.
Seems common sense to me, and I don?t even have red hair!
And lefties, being left-handed is a cursive curse, but also a gift
if one is a pitcher.
Sure... another uncommon trait that does not mean one is any less
"valid" as a person.
True.
Does mean using common (right handed) scissors is a pain!
Indeed!
Amazing how many do not know this.
Most don't really care as long as you don't run with them.
In article <6a00f8b5$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:07:29 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa17f1b531f4898b691@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00d17d$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 11:07:18 AM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510120718.28052f2c@z-z>:
On 10 May 2026 18:04:58 GMT
Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
Eldon Chance <nospam@in.valid> wrote:
On 09 May 2026 23:08:45 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34290981
Now that is "normal" but also geographically isolated hermaphrodism >>>>>>> of a sort.
"When Imperato-McGinley investigated the Guevedoces she discovered >>>>>>> the reason they don't have male genitalia when they are born is
because they are deficient in an enzyme called 5-alpha-reductase, >>>>>>> which normally converts testosterone into dihydro-testosterone.
This deficiency seems to be a genetic condition, quite common in >>>>>>> this part of the Dominican Republic, but vanishingly rare
elsewhere."
By any common measure however it is a genetic miscue, albeit one >>>>>>> that has inspired "treatment'.
Ok.
People who don?t fit the more common binary are about as rare as
redheads. We should not criticize redheads or ask them to hide who >>>>>> they are. We should not mock redheads or act like they?re somehow
broken.
Yet we do...
No. You might... "we" do not.
There is no "we" in your sour bubble.
I do not join you in ignorance. Not sour about it, just a fact. I go with
evidence.
That trans women are really men?
Seems common sense to me, and I don?t even have red hair!
And lefties, being left-handed is a cursive curse, but also a gift if >>>>> one is a pitcher.
Sure... another uncommon trait that does not mean one is any less "valid" as a
person.
Does mean using common (right handed) scissors is a pain!
Maybe they aren't acting like something there really
aren't.
Maybe you are acting like the bigot you are.
You idiots always have a name for someone if they don't
agree with you. The fact is no matter how pretty you are
if you were born with a dick you are a male.
On May 10, 2026 at 2:06:23rC>PM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote <20260510150623.2c65133b@z-z>:
On 10 May 2026 18:08:12 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 10, 2026 at 9:57:33rC>AM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510105733.0cded532@z-z>:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or
breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100%
natural trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight
women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by
design.
Redheads are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
Of course they are:
Yes.AI Overview
Naturally red hair is rare, occurring in only
1rCo2% of the global population. It is most common in individuals with Northern or Northwestern European ancestry, where the prevalence
increases to 2rCo6%.
They are uncommon. Sure. Just like folks in the LGBTQ+ community.
Me neither, but it's their thing.
I do not have red hair. I think redheads should
not be belittled for having red hair.
And yet the English are famous for doing that.
I do not back that.
Chemical alteration of genitals is a recent medical process, not a
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
Keep in mind that nature is not restricted to a simple binary just
to make some people more comfortable.
Nature isn't brewing these trans cocktails.
Nature is not limited to the binary you can handle. Are brunettes
blonde or brunette in your world?
But...if we're heading for a global crisis and population collapse
having less breeders may be part of the larger plan.
What did the lack of support do to create bigots?
You idiots have a name for anyone that doesn't agree with
you.
It is a standard English word. Bigot. And it is the correct one.
No, it's what you use when we don't agree with you
"tolerant" liberals.
On May 10, 2026 at 2:08:39rC>PM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote <20260510150839.54ea3ddb@z-z>:It's somewhat in the vein of their intense provincialism where
On 10 May 2026 18:42:05 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 10, 2026 at 11:07:18rC>AM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510120718.28052f2c@z-z>:
On 10 May 2026 18:04:58 GMT
Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
Eldon Chance <nospam@in.valid> wrote:
On 09 May 2026 23:08:45 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40rC>PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs >>>>>>>>>> or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100%
natural trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34290981
Now that is "normal" but also geographically isolated
hermaphrodism of a sort.
"When Imperato-McGinley investigated the Guevedoces she
discovered the reason they don't have male genitalia when they
are born is because they are deficient in an enzyme called
5-alpha-reductase, which normally converts testosterone into
dihydro-testosterone.
This deficiency seems to be a genetic condition, quite common in
this part of the Dominican Republic, but vanishingly rare
elsewhere."
By any common measure however it is a genetic miscue, albeit one
that has inspired "treatment'.
Ok.
People who donrCOt fit the more common binary are about as rare as
redheads. We should not criticize redheads or ask them to hide
who they are. We should not mock redheads or act like theyrCOre
somehow broken.
Yet we do...
No. You might... "we" do not.
Societal we - prevalent in the UK:
AI Overview
"Gingerism" is a documented form of prejudice
and bullying in the UK, where people with red hair are teased or
harassed, sometimes dismissed as harmless "banter" but often
considered a form of social bullying. It is a long-standing
stereotype, with redheads often facing derogatory nicknames like
"carrot tops" or jokes about having "no soul".Key details regarding
this phenomenon:Cultural Context: While and Ireland have the
highest concentrations of red hair, they also have a history of stigmatizing it.Impact: A 2014 study indicated that over 90% of men
with red hair in the UK reported being targeted by bullying.Nature
of Bullying: Jokes often stem from stereotypes, with some observers
arguing it is the "last socially acceptable form of bullying".Discrimination Debate: Some advocacy groups, like the Anti-Bullying Alliance, have discussed whether this, at its worst,
should be categorized as a hate crime, though this is
debated.Changing Views: Although still prevalent, some feel that
attitudes are gradually changing.This type of discrimination is
often seen as a form of "othering," as red hair is a distinct,
uncommon minority trait.
There are bigots against any group with a small percentage of the
population. Good point.
Seems common sense to me, and I donrCOt even have red hair!
And lefties, being left-handed is a cursive curse, but also a gift
if one is a pitcher.
Sure... another uncommon trait that does not mean one is any less
"valid" as a person.
True.
Does mean using common (right handed) scissors is a pain!
Indeed!
Amazing how many do not know this.
On 2026-05-10 12:57 p.m., Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or
breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural
trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with
cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
+1
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized
regularly is equivalent to love.
You see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
+1
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized
regularly is equivalent to love.
I tend to concur.
On 10 May 2026 21:30:12 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote
No. You might... "we" do not.
Societal we - prevalent in the UK:
AI Overview
"Gingerism" is a documented form of prejudice
and bullying in the UK, where people with red hair are teased or
harassed, sometimes dismissed as harmless "banter" but often
considered a form of social bullying. It is a long-standing
stereotype, with redheads often facing derogatory nicknames like
"carrot tops" or jokes about having "no soul".Key details regarding
this phenomenon:Cultural Context: While and Ireland have the
highest concentrations of red hair, they also have a history of
stigmatizing it.Impact: A 2014 study indicated that over 90% of men
with red hair in the UK reported being targeted by bullying.Nature
of Bullying: Jokes often stem from stereotypes, with some observers
arguing it is the "last socially acceptable form of
bullying".Discrimination Debate: Some advocacy groups, like the
Anti-Bullying Alliance, have discussed whether this, at its worst,
should be categorized as a hate crime, though this is
debated.Changing Views: Although still prevalent, some feel that
attitudes are gradually changing.This type of discrimination is
often seen as a form of "othering," as red hair is a distinct,
uncommon minority trait.
There are bigots against any group with a small percentage of the
population. Good point.
It's somewhat in the vein of their intense provincialism where
accents are concerned.
On 2026-05-10 6:16 p.m., Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a00f7f9$0$44102$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:01:07 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa001cf13e36098b68c@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a0031b7$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Bill Oaks <memphis@hillbillies.org> wrote:
On 09 May 2026, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> posted some >>>>>> news:69ffbe7c$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40|ore4->PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
There's a difference between natural oddities that occur because
of inbreeding and the self-induced due to poor decisions and lack of >>>>>> familial support.
What did the lack of support do to create bigots?
You idiots have a name for anyone that doesn't agree with
you.
It is a standard English word. Bigot. And it is the correct one.
No, it's what you use when we don't agree with you
"tolerant" liberals.
"Believe everything we say or else we will label you! Our labels are
more powerful than anything in the world. They are like kryptonite to Superman... unless you don't mind the label, at which point our ultimate weapon is completely impotent."
Don't let the Prescott faggot and Baked Anus believe that their labels
have any effect. Take pride in being called a bigot, an islamophobe, a racist, a misogynist, a Nazi or whatever else these limp-wristed
leftists throw at you.
On Sun, 10 May 2026 17:46:45 -0400
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-05-10 12:57 p.m., Eldon Chance wrote:You see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or
breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural
trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with
cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
+1
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized
regularly is equivalent to love.
I tend to concur.
In article <6a00c8ca$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Eldon Chance <nospam@in.valid> wrote:
On 09 May 2026 23:08:45 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40aPM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or
breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with
cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34290981
Now that is "normal" but also geographically isolated hermaphrodism of a >>> sort.
"When Imperato-McGinley investigated the Guevedoces she discovered the
reason they don't have male genitalia when they are born is because they >>> are deficient in an enzyme called 5-alpha-reductase, which normally
converts testosterone into dihydro-testosterone.
This deficiency seems to be a genetic condition, quite common in this
part of the Dominican Republic, but vanishingly rare elsewhere."
By any common measure however it is a genetic miscue, albeit one that
has inspired "treatment'.
Ok.
People who don?t fit the more common binary are about as rare as redheads. >> We should not criticize redheads or ask them to hide who they are. We
should not mock redheads or act like they?re somehow broken.
Seems common sense to me, and I don?t even have red hair!
You have no argument. A redheaded trans woman is really
my wildest dream.
On May 10, 2026 at 3:10:12aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.446ab034279cb7c098b698@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00f845$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:05:58 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa1258a6dae2298b690@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00c8ca$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Eldon Chance <nospam@in.valid> wrote:
On 09 May 2026 23:08:45 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34290981
Now that is "normal" but also geographically isolated hermaphrodism of a
sort.
"When Imperato-McGinley investigated the Guevedoces she discovered the >>>>> reason they don't have male genitalia when they are born is because they
are deficient in an enzyme called 5-alpha-reductase, which normally >>>>> converts testosterone into dihydro-testosterone.
This deficiency seems to be a genetic condition, quite common in this >>>>> part of the Dominican Republic, but vanishingly rare elsewhere."
By any common measure however it is a genetic miscue, albeit one that >>>>> has inspired "treatment'.
Ok.
People who don?t fit the more common binary are about as rare as redheads.
We should not criticize redheads or ask them to hide who they are. We >>>> should not mock redheads or act like they?re somehow broken.
Seems common sense to me, and I don?t even have red hair!
You have no argument. A redheaded trans woman is really
just a man.
Are they blonde or brunette? Fit them into a binary so you are comfortable.
Bet that point went over your head.
The only point needed is the fact that trans women are
really men.
A claim that is not backed by evidence / science.
I tend to go with evidence over you who goes with emotion. We will not see eye
to eye.
On May 10, 2026 at 3:11:53aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.446ab09274dd34d998b699@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00f890$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:06:23 PM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510150623.2c65133b@z-z>:
On 10 May 2026 18:08:12 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 10, 2026 at 9:57:33 AM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510105733.0cded532@z-z>:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design. >>>>>
Redheads are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
Of course they are:
AI Overview
Naturally red hair is rare, occurring in only
1?2% of the global population. It is most common in individuals with
Northern or Northwestern European ancestry, where the prevalence
increases to 2?6%.
They are uncommon. Sure. Just like folks in the LGBTQ+ community.
"uncommon" is being nice.
It is being accurate. Being in that community, or being red headed, is rare. Nothing wrong with being in a rare group.
I do not have red hair. I think redheads should
not be belittled for having red hair.
And yet the English are famous for doing that.
I do not back that.
They don't care and they outnumber you.
And?
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
Keep in mind that nature is not restricted to a simple binary just to >>>> make some people more comfortable.
Nature isn't brewing these trans cocktails.
Nature is not limited to the binary you can handle. Are brunettes blonde or
brunette in your world?
Women or men ones?
Either... or nonbinary ones. But you will not answer the question.
But...if we're heading for a global crisis and population collapse
having less breeders may be part of the larger plan.
On May 10, 2026 at 3:14:03aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.446ab111ae48fa1c98b69a@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00f8b5$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:07:29 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa17f1b531f4898b691@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00d17d$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 11:07:18 AM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510120718.28052f2c@z-z>:
On 10 May 2026 18:04:58 GMT
Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
Eldon Chance <nospam@in.valid> wrote:
On 09 May 2026 23:08:45 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34290981
Now that is "normal" but also geographically isolated hermaphrodism >>>>>>> of a sort.
"When Imperato-McGinley investigated the Guevedoces she discovered >>>>>>> the reason they don't have male genitalia when they are born is >>>>>>> because they are deficient in an enzyme called 5-alpha-reductase, >>>>>>> which normally converts testosterone into dihydro-testosterone. >>>>>>>
This deficiency seems to be a genetic condition, quite common in >>>>>>> this part of the Dominican Republic, but vanishingly rare
elsewhere."
By any common measure however it is a genetic miscue, albeit one >>>>>>> that has inspired "treatment'.
Ok.
People who don?t fit the more common binary are about as rare as >>>>>> redheads. We should not criticize redheads or ask them to hide who >>>>>> they are. We should not mock redheads or act like they?re somehow >>>>>> broken.
Yet we do...
No. You might... "we" do not.
There is no "we" in your sour bubble.
I do not join you in ignorance. Not sour about it, just a fact. I go with >> evidence.
That trans women are really men?
That trans women are trans women.
Seems common sense to me, and I don?t even have red hair!
And lefties, being left-handed is a cursive curse, but also a gift if >>>>> one is a pitcher.
Sure... another uncommon trait that does not mean one is any less "valid" as a
person.
Does mean using common (right handed) scissors is a pain!
Maybe they aren't acting like something there really
aren't.
Maybe you are acting like the bigot you are.
You idiots always have a name for someone if they don't
agree with you. The fact is no matter how pretty you are
if you were born with a dick you are a male.
It is an accurate term. And you are the one using bigoted offenses terms.
Notice you just make claims based on proclamation. You have no scientific evidence to back this.
On May 10, 2026 at 3:15:13aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.446ab15ce4a75fab98b69b@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00f8e4$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:08:39 PM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510150839.54ea3ddb@z-z>:
On 10 May 2026 18:42:05 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 10, 2026 at 11:07:18 AM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510120718.28052f2c@z-z>:
On 10 May 2026 18:04:58 GMT
Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
Eldon Chance <nospam@in.valid> wrote:
On 09 May 2026 23:08:45 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34290981
Now that is "normal" but also geographically isolated
hermaphrodism of a sort.
"When Imperato-McGinley investigated the Guevedoces she discovered >>>>>>> the reason they don't have male genitalia when they are born is >>>>>>> because they are deficient in an enzyme called 5-alpha-reductase, >>>>>>> which normally converts testosterone into dihydro-testosterone. >>>>>>>
This deficiency seems to be a genetic condition, quite common in >>>>>>> this part of the Dominican Republic, but vanishingly rare
elsewhere."
By any common measure however it is a genetic miscue, albeit one >>>>>>> that has inspired "treatment'.
Ok.
People who don?t fit the more common binary are about as rare as >>>>>> redheads. We should not criticize redheads or ask them to hide who >>>>>> they are. We should not mock redheads or act like they?re somehow >>>>>> broken.
Yet we do...
No. You might... "we" do not.
Societal we - prevalent in the UK:
AI Overview
"Gingerism" is a documented form of prejudice
and bullying in the UK, where people with red hair are teased or
harassed, sometimes dismissed as harmless "banter" but often considered >>> a form of social bullying. It is a long-standing stereotype, with
redheads often facing derogatory nicknames like "carrot tops" or jokes >>> about having "no soul".Key details regarding this phenomenon:Cultural
Context: While and Ireland have the highest concentrations of red hair, >>> they also have a history of stigmatizing it.Impact: A 2014 study
indicated that over 90% of men with red hair in the UK reported being
targeted by bullying.Nature of Bullying: Jokes often stem from
stereotypes, with some observers arguing it is the "last socially
acceptable form of bullying".Discrimination Debate: Some advocacy
groups, like the Anti-Bullying Alliance, have discussed whether this,
at its worst, should be categorized as a hate crime, though this is
debated.Changing Views: Although still prevalent, some feel that
attitudes are gradually changing.This type of discrimination is often
seen as a form of "othering," as red hair is a distinct, uncommon
minority trait.
There are bigots against any group with a small percentage of the population.
Good point.
Butt fucker learned a new word.
It is not a new word.
Seems common sense to me, and I don?t even have red hair!
And lefties, being left-handed is a cursive curse, but also a gift >>>>> if one is a pitcher.
Sure... another uncommon trait that does not mean one is any less
"valid" as a person.
True.
Does mean using common (right handed) scissors is a pain!
Indeed!
Amazing how many do not know this.
Most don't really care as long as you don't run with them.
:)
On May 10, 2026 at 3:36:10aPM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote <6a01085a$6$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-10 6:16 p.m., Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a00f7f9$0$44102$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:01:07 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa001cf13e36098b68c@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a0031b7$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Bill Oaks <memphis@hillbillies.org> wrote:
On 09 May 2026, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> posted some
news:69ffbe7c$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40rn>PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
There's a difference between natural oddities that occur because >>>>>> of inbreeding and the self-induced due to poor decisions and lack of >>>>>> familial support.
What did the lack of support do to create bigots?
You idiots have a name for anyone that doesn't agree with
you.
It is a standard English word. Bigot. And it is the correct one.
No, it's what you use when we don't agree with you
"tolerant" liberals.
"Believe everything we say or else we will label you! Our labels are
more powerful than anything in the world. They are like kryptonite to Superman... unless you don't mind the label, at which point our ultimate weapon is completely impotent."
Don't let the Prescott faggot and Baked Anus believe that their labels
have any effect. Take pride in being called a bigot, an islamophobe, a racist, a misogynist, a Nazi or whatever else these limp-wristed
leftists throw at you.
That is not at all accurate. It is if you act like a bigot it makes sense to honestly note this. It is not labeling you, it is identifying you. And, sure, you can take pride in your bigotry. If you really are proud to be so insecure and irrational that is on you.
But what you are not going to do is make me feel bad for noting your lack of tolerance tied to your insecurities. There is nothing wrong with being honest about your harm.
On May 10, 2026 at 3:16:16aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.446ab1945d70566098b69c@usnews.blocknews.net>:
...
What did the lack of support do to create bigots?
You idiots have a name for anyone that doesn't agree with
you.
It is a standard English word. Bigot. And it is the correct one.
No, it's what you use when we don't agree with you
"tolerant" liberals.
The Paradox of Tolerance is real.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
-----
The paradox of tolerance is a philosophical concept suggesting
that if a society extends tolerance to those who are intolerant,
it risks enabling the eventual dominance of intolerance, thereby
undermining the very principle of tolerance.
-----
There is nothing to "tolerate" about someone being gay or bi or trans or Jewish or red-headed or left-handed or white or black or Christian or Muslim or tall or short or ... you get the idea (I hope). These are not things that are harming others.
There is no reason to "tolerate" bigotry. That IS harmful. It should be called
out. That helps to mitigate the harm.
When you bigots whine you are not being tolerated where you targets are, you are saying your HARM should be seen as equal to non-harm. It is an irrational view. It is an entitled view. But that really is at the heart of bigotry -- you think you are entitled, but you are also insecure. You feel you have to put others down for no good reason other than to feel better about yourself (and to back your tribalism and scapegoating).
On May 10, 2026 at 2:46:45aPM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote <6a00fcc5$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-10 12:57 p.m., Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or
breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural
trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with
cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
+1
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized
regularly is equivalent to love.
Your bigotry is the real issue.
On May 10, 2026 at 3:09:32aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.446ab005d2bb8b9b98b697@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00f81a$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:04:38 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa0ce55a063ef98b68e@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00c98c$0$77130$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 9:57:33 AM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510105733.0cded532@z-z>:
Redheads are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design. >>>>
I do not have red hair. I think redheads should not be belittled for having
red hair.
Sounds like you're the only person doing that.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
Keep in mind that nature is not restricted to a simple binary just to make
some people more comfortable.
Dick = Male
Pussy = Female.
Trans women are really men.
Why don't you go with the science instead of a second grade understanding?
Any idiot knows this. You get fucked in the ass by a man
in a dress.
Do not follow. Just making random bigoted attacks?
On May 10, 2026 at 3:46:39aPM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote <20260510164639.4a2dcce5@z-z>:
...
You see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
+1
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized
regularly is equivalent to love.
I tend to concur.
Interesting you spend time picturing men having sex.
In article <6a0108cc$0$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:10:12 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446ab034279cb7c098b698@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00f845$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:05:58 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa1258a6dae2298b690@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00c8ca$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Eldon Chance <nospam@in.valid> wrote:
On 09 May 2026 23:08:45 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34290981
Now that is "normal" but also geographically isolated hermaphrodism of a
sort.
"When Imperato-McGinley investigated the Guevedoces she discovered the >>>>>>> reason they don't have male genitalia when they are born is because they
are deficient in an enzyme called 5-alpha-reductase, which normally >>>>>>> converts testosterone into dihydro-testosterone.
This deficiency seems to be a genetic condition, quite common in this >>>>>>> part of the Dominican Republic, but vanishingly rare elsewhere." >>>>>>>
By any common measure however it is a genetic miscue, albeit one that >>>>>>> has inspired "treatment'.
Ok.
People who don?t fit the more common binary are about as rare as redheads.
We should not criticize redheads or ask them to hide who they are. We >>>>>> should not mock redheads or act like they?re somehow broken.
Seems common sense to me, and I don?t even have red hair!
You have no argument. A redheaded trans woman is really
just a man.
Are they blonde or brunette? Fit them into a binary so you are comfortable.
Bet that point went over your head.
The only point needed is the fact that trans women are
really men.
A claim that is not backed by evidence / science.
I tend to go with evidence over you who goes with emotion. We will not see eye
to eye.
If that "trans woman" has a dick it's a male.
In article <6a010964$0$13959$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:14:03 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446ab111ae48fa1c98b69a@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00f8b5$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:07:29 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa17f1b531f4898b691@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00d17d$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 11:07:18 AM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510120718.28052f2c@z-z>:
On 10 May 2026 18:04:58 GMT
Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
Eldon Chance <nospam@in.valid> wrote:
On 09 May 2026 23:08:45 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34290981
Now that is "normal" but also geographically isolated hermaphrodism >>>>>>>>> of a sort.
"When Imperato-McGinley investigated the Guevedoces she discovered >>>>>>>>> the reason they don't have male genitalia when they are born is >>>>>>>>> because they are deficient in an enzyme called 5-alpha-reductase, >>>>>>>>> which normally converts testosterone into dihydro-testosterone. >>>>>>>>>
This deficiency seems to be a genetic condition, quite common in >>>>>>>>> this part of the Dominican Republic, but vanishingly rare
elsewhere."
By any common measure however it is a genetic miscue, albeit one >>>>>>>>> that has inspired "treatment'.
Ok.
People who don?t fit the more common binary are about as rare as >>>>>>>> redheads. We should not criticize redheads or ask them to hide who >>>>>>>> they are. We should not mock redheads or act like they?re somehow >>>>>>>> broken.
Yet we do...
No. You might... "we" do not.
There is no "we" in your sour bubble.
I do not join you in ignorance. Not sour about it, just a fact. I go with >>>> evidence.
That trans women are really men?
That trans women are trans women.
With dicks. That makes them a male.
Seems common sense to me, and I don?t even have red hair!
And lefties, being left-handed is a cursive curse, but also a gift if >>>>>>> one is a pitcher.
Sure... another uncommon trait that does not mean one is any less "valid" as a
person.
Does mean using common (right handed) scissors is a pain!
Maybe they aren't acting like something there really
aren't.
Maybe you are acting like the bigot you are.
You idiots always have a name for someone if they don't
agree with you. The fact is no matter how pretty you are
if you were born with a dick you are a male.
It is an accurate term. And you are the one using bigoted offenses terms.
Notice you just make claims based on proclamation. You have no scientific
evidence to back this.
Any idiot knows if you have a dick you are a male.
In article <6a010f50$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:36:10 PM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a01085a$6$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-10 6:16 p.m., Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a00f7f9$0$44102$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:01:07 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa001cf13e36098b68c@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a0031b7$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Bill Oaks <memphis@hillbillies.org> wrote:
On 09 May 2026, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> posted some
news:69ffbe7c$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40|ore4->PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote >>>>>>>>> <46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
There's a difference between natural oddities that occur because >>>>>>>> of inbreeding and the self-induced due to poor decisions and lack of >>>>>>>> familial support.
What did the lack of support do to create bigots?
You idiots have a name for anyone that doesn't agree with
you.
It is a standard English word. Bigot. And it is the correct one.
No, it's what you use when we don't agree with you
"tolerant" liberals.
"Believe everything we say or else we will label you! Our labels are
more powerful than anything in the world. They are like kryptonite to
Superman... unless you don't mind the label, at which point our ultimate >>> weapon is completely impotent."
Don't let the Prescott faggot and Baked Anus believe that their labels
have any effect. Take pride in being called a bigot, an islamophobe, a
racist, a misogynist, a Nazi or whatever else these limp-wristed
leftists throw at you.
That is not at all accurate. It is if you act like a bigot it makes sense to >> honestly note this. It is not labeling you, it is identifying you. And, sure,
you can take pride in your bigotry. If you really are proud to be so insecure
and irrational that is on you.
But what you are not going to do is make me feel bad for noting your lack of >> tolerance tied to your insecurities. There is nothing wrong with being honest
about your harm.
You're gay because you let a trans woman fuck you.
In article <6a010a81$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:16:16 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446ab1945d70566098b69c@usnews.blocknews.net>:
...
What did the lack of support do to create bigots?
You idiots have a name for anyone that doesn't agree with
you.
It is a standard English word. Bigot. And it is the correct one.
No, it's what you use when we don't agree with you
"tolerant" liberals.
The Paradox of Tolerance is real.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
-----
The paradox of tolerance is a philosophical concept suggesting
that if a society extends tolerance to those who are intolerant,
it risks enabling the eventual dominance of intolerance, thereby
undermining the very principle of tolerance.
-----
There is nothing to "tolerate" about someone being gay or bi or trans or
Jewish or red-headed or left-handed or white or black or Christian or Muslim >> or tall or short or ... you get the idea (I hope). These are not things that >> are harming others.
There is no reason to "tolerate" bigotry. That IS harmful. It should be called
out. That helps to mitigate the harm.
When you bigots whine you are not being tolerated where you targets are, you >> are saying your HARM should be seen as equal to non-harm. It is an irrational
view. It is an entitled view. But that really is at the heart of bigotry -- >> you think you are entitled, but you are also insecure. You feel you have to >> put others down for no good reason other than to feel better about yourself >> (and to back your tribalism and scapegoating).
Trans women are really men.
In article <6a010899$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:46:45 PM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a00fcc5$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-10 12:57 p.m., Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or
breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with
cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
+1
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized
regularly is equivalent to love.
Your bigotry is the real issue.
Us not agreeing with you isn't bigotry.
In article <6a0108af$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:09:32 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446ab005d2bb8b9b98b697@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00f81a$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
Any idiot knows this. You get fucked in the ass by a man
On May 10, 2026 at 2:04:38 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa0ce55a063ef98b68e@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00c98c$0$77130$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 9:57:33 AM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510105733.0cded532@z-z>:
Redheads are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design. >>>>>>
I do not have red hair. I think redheads should not be belittled for having
red hair.
Sounds like you're the only person doing that.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
Keep in mind that nature is not restricted to a simple binary just to make
some people more comfortable.
Dick = Male
Pussy = Female.
Trans women are really men.
Why don't you go with the science instead of a second grade understanding? >>>
in a dress.
Do not follow. Just making random bigoted attacks?
Just stating facts.
In article <6a010c9d$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:46:39 PM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510164639.4a2dcce5@z-z>:
...
You see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
+1
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized
regularly is equivalent to love.
I tend to concur.
Interesting you spend time picturing men having sex.
Interesting YOU actually do it.
On May 10, 2026 at 10:07:18aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.446b11ef48d7796c98b69f@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a0108cc$0$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:10:12 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446ab034279cb7c098b698@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00f845$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:05:58 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa1258a6dae2298b690@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00c8ca$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Eldon Chance <nospam@in.valid> wrote:
On 09 May 2026 23:08:45 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34290981
Now that is "normal" but also geographically isolated hermaphrodism of a
sort.
"When Imperato-McGinley investigated the Guevedoces she discovered the
reason they don't have male genitalia when they are born is because they
are deficient in an enzyme called 5-alpha-reductase, which normally >>>>>>> converts testosterone into dihydro-testosterone.
This deficiency seems to be a genetic condition, quite common in this >>>>>>> part of the Dominican Republic, but vanishingly rare elsewhere." >>>>>>>
By any common measure however it is a genetic miscue, albeit one that >>>>>>> has inspired "treatment'.
Ok.
People who don?t fit the more common binary are about as rare as redheads.
We should not criticize redheads or ask them to hide who they are. We >>>>>> should not mock redheads or act like they?re somehow broken.
Seems common sense to me, and I don?t even have red hair!
You have no argument. A redheaded trans woman is really
just a man.
Are they blonde or brunette? Fit them into a binary so you are comfortable.
Bet that point went over your head.
The only point needed is the fact that trans women are
really men.
A claim that is not backed by evidence / science.
I tend to go with evidence over you who goes with emotion. We will not see eye
to eye.
If that "trans woman" has a dick it's a male.
So you keep saying -- with no evidence or support.
On May 10, 2026 at 10:09:19aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.446b126533964bf998b6a1@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a010964$0$13959$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:14:03 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446ab111ae48fa1c98b69a@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00f8b5$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:07:29 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa17f1b531f4898b691@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00d17d$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 11:07:18 AM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510120718.28052f2c@z-z>:
On 10 May 2026 18:04:58 GMT
Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
Eldon Chance <nospam@in.valid> wrote:
On 09 May 2026 23:08:45 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote >>>>>>>>>> <46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural
trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34290981
Now that is "normal" but also geographically isolated hermaphrodism >>>>>>>>> of a sort.
"When Imperato-McGinley investigated the Guevedoces she discovered >>>>>>>>> the reason they don't have male genitalia when they are born is >>>>>>>>> because they are deficient in an enzyme called 5-alpha-reductase, >>>>>>>>> which normally converts testosterone into dihydro-testosterone. >>>>>>>>>
This deficiency seems to be a genetic condition, quite common in >>>>>>>>> this part of the Dominican Republic, but vanishingly rare
elsewhere."
By any common measure however it is a genetic miscue, albeit one >>>>>>>>> that has inspired "treatment'.
Ok.
People who don?t fit the more common binary are about as rare as >>>>>>>> redheads. We should not criticize redheads or ask them to hide who >>>>>>>> they are. We should not mock redheads or act like they?re somehow >>>>>>>> broken.
Yet we do...
No. You might... "we" do not.
There is no "we" in your sour bubble.
I do not join you in ignorance. Not sour about it, just a fact. I go with
evidence.
That trans women are really men?
That trans women are trans women.
With dicks. That makes them a male.
So you say with no evidence.
Seems common sense to me, and I don?t even have red hair!
And lefties, being left-handed is a cursive curse, but also a gift if >>>>>>> one is a pitcher.
Sure... another uncommon trait that does not mean one is any less "valid" as a
person.
Does mean using common (right handed) scissors is a pain!
Maybe they aren't acting like something there really
aren't.
Maybe you are acting like the bigot you are.
You idiots always have a name for someone if they don't
agree with you. The fact is no matter how pretty you are
if you were born with a dick you are a male.
It is an accurate term. And you are the one using bigoted offenses terms. >>
Notice you just make claims based on proclamation. You have no scientific >> evidence to back this.
Any idiot knows if you have a dick you are a male.
Claims by proclamation are not the same as claims by evidence.
On May 10, 2026 at 10:11:29aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.446b12f092404eb98b6a3@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a010f50$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:36:10 PM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a01085a$6$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-10 6:16 p.m., Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a00f7f9$0$44102$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:01:07 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa001cf13e36098b68c@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a0031b7$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Bill Oaks <memphis@hillbillies.org> wrote:
On 09 May 2026, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> posted some
news:69ffbe7c$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40rn>PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote >>>>>>>>> <46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
There's a difference between natural oddities that occur because >>>>>>>> of inbreeding and the self-induced due to poor decisions and lack of >>>>>>>> familial support.
What did the lack of support do to create bigots?
You idiots have a name for anyone that doesn't agree with
you.
It is a standard English word. Bigot. And it is the correct one.
No, it's what you use when we don't agree with you
"tolerant" liberals.
"Believe everything we say or else we will label you! Our labels are
more powerful than anything in the world. They are like kryptonite to
Superman... unless you don't mind the label, at which point our ultimate >>> weapon is completely impotent."
Don't let the Prescott faggot and Baked Anus believe that their labels >>> have any effect. Take pride in being called a bigot, an islamophobe, a >>> racist, a misogynist, a Nazi or whatever else these limp-wristed
leftists throw at you.
That is not at all accurate. It is if you act like a bigot it makes sense to
honestly note this. It is not labeling you, it is identifying you. And, sure,
you can take pride in your bigotry. If you really are proud to be so insecure
and irrational that is on you.
But what you are not going to do is make me feel bad for noting your lack of
tolerance tied to your insecurities. There is nothing wrong with being honest
about your harm.
You're gay because you let a trans woman fuck you.
Incorrect.
In article <6a016c91$0$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 10:07:18aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446b11ef48d7796c98b69f@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a0108cc$0$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:10:12 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446ab034279cb7c098b698@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00f845$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:05:58 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa1258a6dae2298b690@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00c8ca$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Eldon Chance <nospam@in.valid> wrote:
On 09 May 2026 23:08:45 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34290981
Now that is "normal" but also geographically isolated hermaphrodism of a
sort.
"When Imperato-McGinley investigated the Guevedoces she discovered the
reason they don't have male genitalia when they are born is because they
are deficient in an enzyme called 5-alpha-reductase, which normally >>>>>>>>> converts testosterone into dihydro-testosterone.
This deficiency seems to be a genetic condition, quite common in this >>>>>>>>> part of the Dominican Republic, but vanishingly rare elsewhere." >>>>>>>>>
By any common measure however it is a genetic miscue, albeit one that >>>>>>>>> has inspired "treatment'.
Ok.
People who don?t fit the more common binary are about as rare as redheads.
We should not criticize redheads or ask them to hide who they are. We >>>>>>>> should not mock redheads or act like they?re somehow broken.
Seems common sense to me, and I don?t even have red hair!
You have no argument. A redheaded trans woman is really
just a man.
Are they blonde or brunette? Fit them into a binary so you are comfortable.
Bet that point went over your head.
The only point needed is the fact that trans women are
really men.
A claim that is not backed by evidence / science.
I tend to go with evidence over you who goes with emotion. We will not see eye
to eye.
If that "trans woman" has a dick it's a male.
So you keep saying -- with no evidence or support.
None needed. Any idiot knows a person with a dick is male.
Except for the one you keep up your ass.
On May 10, 2026 at 10:12:30aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.446b132bde5b8b1498b6a4@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a010a81$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:16:16 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446ab1945d70566098b69c@usnews.blocknews.net>:
...
What did the lack of support do to create bigots?
You idiots have a name for anyone that doesn't agree with
you.
It is a standard English word. Bigot. And it is the correct one.
No, it's what you use when we don't agree with you
"tolerant" liberals.
The Paradox of Tolerance is real.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
-----
The paradox of tolerance is a philosophical concept suggesting
that if a society extends tolerance to those who are intolerant,
it risks enabling the eventual dominance of intolerance, thereby
undermining the very principle of tolerance.
-----
There is nothing to "tolerate" about someone being gay or bi or trans or >> Jewish or red-headed or left-handed or white or black or Christian or Muslim
or tall or short or ... you get the idea (I hope). These are not things that
are harming others.
There is no reason to "tolerate" bigotry. That IS harmful. It should be called
out. That helps to mitigate the harm.
When you bigots whine you are not being tolerated where you targets are, you
are saying your HARM should be seen as equal to non-harm. It is an irrational
view. It is an entitled view. But that really is at the heart of bigotry --
you think you are entitled, but you are also insecure. You feel you have to
put others down for no good reason other than to feel better about yourself
(and to back your tribalism and scapegoating).
Trans women are really men.
You keep saying that as if repetition gives it power.
On May 10, 2026 at 10:13:30aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.446b1365dc5420c798b6a5@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a010899$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:46:45 PM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a00fcc5$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-10 12:57 p.m., Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
+1
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized
regularly is equivalent to love.
Your bigotry is the real issue.
Us not agreeing with you isn't bigotry.
Agreed. Your bigotry, though, is bigotry.
On May 10, 2026 at 10:14:10aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.446b138b4b75018a98b6a6@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a0108af$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:09:32 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446ab005d2bb8b9b98b697@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00f81a$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:04:38 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa0ce55a063ef98b68e@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00c98c$0$77130$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 9:57:33 AM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510105733.0cded532@z-z>:
Redheads are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design. >>>>>>
I do not have red hair. I think redheads should not be belittled for having
red hair.
Sounds like you're the only person doing that.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
Keep in mind that nature is not restricted to a simple binary just to make
some people more comfortable.
Dick = Male
Pussy = Female.
Trans women are really men.
Why don't you go with the science instead of a second grade understanding?
Any idiot knows this. You get fucked in the ass by a man
in a dress.
Do not follow. Just making random bigoted attacks?
Just stating facts.
Then support these "facts". But you never will.
On May 10, 2026 at 10:16:11aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.446b14054d92423498b6a7@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a010c9d$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:46:39 PM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510164639.4a2dcce5@z-z>:
...
You see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
+1
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized
regularly is equivalent to love.
I tend to concur.
Interesting you spend time picturing men having sex.
Interesting YOU actually do it.
In your mind... perhaps. That is a YOU issue.
In article <6a010f50$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:36:10-aPM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a01085a$6$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-10 6:16 p.m., Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a00f7f9$0$44102$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:01:07 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa001cf13e36098b68c@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a0031b7$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Bill Oaks <memphis@hillbillies.org> wrote:
On 09 May 2026, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> posted some
news:69ffbe7c$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40|ore4->PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote >>>>>>>>> <46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
There's a difference between natural oddities that occur because >>>>>>>> of inbreeding and the self-induced due to poor decisions and lack of >>>>>>>> familial support.
What did the lack of support do to create bigots?
You idiots have a name for anyone that doesn't agree with
you.
It is a standard English word. Bigot. And it is the correct one.
No, it's what you use when we don't agree with you
"tolerant" liberals.
"Believe everything we say or else we will label you! Our labels are
more powerful than anything in the world. They are like kryptonite to
Superman... unless you don't mind the label, at which point our ultimate >>> weapon is completely impotent."
Don't let the Prescott faggot and Baked Anus believe that their labels
have any effect. Take pride in being called a bigot, an islamophobe, a
racist, a misogynist, a Nazi or whatever else these limp-wristed
leftists throw at you.
That is not at all accurate. It is if you act like a bigot it makes sense to >> honestly note this. It is not labeling you, it is identifying you. And, sure,
you can take pride in your bigotry. If you really are proud to be so insecure
and irrational that is on you.
But what you are not going to do is make me feel bad for noting your lack of >> tolerance tied to your insecurities. There is nothing wrong with being honest
about your harm.
You're gay because you let a trans woman fuck you.
In article <6a010899$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:46:45-aPM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a00fcc5$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-10 12:57 p.m., Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or
breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with
cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
+1
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized
regularly is equivalent to love.
Your bigotry is the real issue.
Us not agreeing with you isn't bigotry.
In article <6a016ccf$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 10:11:29-aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446b12f092404eb98b6a3@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a010f50$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:36:10 PM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a01085a$6$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-10 6:16 p.m., Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a00f7f9$0$44102$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:01:07 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa001cf13e36098b68c@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a0031b7$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Bill Oaks <memphis@hillbillies.org> wrote:
On 09 May 2026, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> posted some
news:69ffbe7c$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40|ore4->PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote >>>>>>>>>>> <46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>>
There's a difference between natural oddities that occur because >>>>>>>>>> of inbreeding and the self-induced due to poor decisions and lack of >>>>>>>>>> familial support.
What did the lack of support do to create bigots?
You idiots have a name for anyone that doesn't agree with
you.
It is a standard English word. Bigot. And it is the correct one.
No, it's what you use when we don't agree with you
"tolerant" liberals.
"Believe everything we say or else we will label you! Our labels are >>>>> more powerful than anything in the world. They are like kryptonite to >>>>> Superman... unless you don't mind the label, at which point our ultimate >>>>> weapon is completely impotent."
Don't let the Prescott faggot and Baked Anus believe that their labels >>>>> have any effect. Take pride in being called a bigot, an islamophobe, a >>>>> racist, a misogynist, a Nazi or whatever else these limp-wristed
leftists throw at you.
That is not at all accurate. It is if you act like a bigot it makes sense to
honestly note this. It is not labeling you, it is identifying you. And, sure,
you can take pride in your bigotry. If you really are proud to be so insecure
and irrational that is on you.
But what you are not going to do is make me feel bad for noting your lack of
tolerance tied to your insecurities. There is nothing wrong with being honest
about your harm.
You're gay because you let a trans woman fuck you.
Incorrect.
As he slowly tries to slink away. If you take a dick in
the ass you are a fag.
Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a016c91$0$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 10:07:18aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446b11ef48d7796c98b69f@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a0108cc$0$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:10:12 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446ab034279cb7c098b698@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00f845$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:05:58 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa1258a6dae2298b690@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00c8ca$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Eldon Chance <nospam@in.valid> wrote:
On 09 May 2026 23:08:45 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote >>>>>>>>>> <46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural
trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34290981
Now that is "normal" but also geographically isolated hermaphrodism of a
sort.
"When Imperato-McGinley investigated the Guevedoces she discovered the
reason they don't have male genitalia when they are born is because they
are deficient in an enzyme called 5-alpha-reductase, which normally >>>>>>>>> converts testosterone into dihydro-testosterone.
This deficiency seems to be a genetic condition, quite common in this
part of the Dominican Republic, but vanishingly rare elsewhere." >>>>>>>>>
By any common measure however it is a genetic miscue, albeit one that
has inspired "treatment'.
Ok.
People who don?t fit the more common binary are about as rare as redheads.
We should not criticize redheads or ask them to hide who they are. We
should not mock redheads or act like they?re somehow broken. >>>>>>>>
Seems common sense to me, and I don?t even have red hair!
You have no argument. A redheaded trans woman is really
just a man.
Are they blonde or brunette? Fit them into a binary so you are comfortable.
Bet that point went over your head.
The only point needed is the fact that trans women are
really men.
A claim that is not backed by evidence / science.
I tend to go with evidence over you who goes with emotion. We will not see eye
to eye.
If that "trans woman" has a dick it's a male.
So you keep saying -- with no evidence or support.
None needed. Any idiot knows a person with a dick is male.
Except for the one you keep up your ass.
The only rational voice on this that I've heard is that if it doesn't
have a uterus it is not female. This is what Elon Musk said. You know,
he's a billionaire and takes more than 30 seconds to formulate his statements, Skeeter.
On 2026-05-11 1:13 a.m., Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a010899$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:46:45-aPM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a00fcc5$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-10 12:57 p.m., Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
+1
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized
regularly is equivalent to love.
Your bigotry is the real issue.
Us not agreeing with you isn't bigotry.
Far-leftists like Snit always see themselves as the only ones capable of judging what is moral and what isn't.
On 2026-05-11 10:13 a.m., Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a016ccf$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 10:11:29-aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446b12f092404eb98b6a3@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a010f50$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:36:10 PM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a01085a$6$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-10 6:16 p.m., Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a00f7f9$0$44102$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
No, it's what you use when we don't agree with you
On May 10, 2026 at 2:01:07 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa001cf13e36098b68c@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a0031b7$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Bill Oaks <memphis@hillbillies.org> wrote:
On 09 May 2026, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> posted some
news:69ffbe7c$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40|ore4->PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote >>>>>>>>>>>> <46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural
trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>>>
There's a difference between natural oddities that occur because >>>>>>>>>>> of inbreeding and the self-induced due to poor decisions and lack of
familial support.
What did the lack of support do to create bigots?
You idiots have a name for anyone that doesn't agree with
you.
It is a standard English word. Bigot. And it is the correct one. >>>>>>>
"tolerant" liberals.
"Believe everything we say or else we will label you! Our labels are >>>>>> more powerful than anything in the world. They are like kryptonite to >>>>>> Superman... unless you don't mind the label, at which point our ultimate >>>>>> weapon is completely impotent."
Don't let the Prescott faggot and Baked Anus believe that their labels >>>>>> have any effect. Take pride in being called a bigot, an islamophobe, a >>>>>> racist, a misogynist, a Nazi or whatever else these limp-wristed
leftists throw at you.
That is not at all accurate. It is if you act like a bigot it makes sense to
honestly note this. It is not labeling you, it is identifying you. And, sure,
you can take pride in your bigotry. If you really are proud to be so insecure
and irrational that is on you.
But what you are not going to do is make me feel bad for noting your lack of
tolerance tied to your insecurities. There is nothing wrong with being honest
about your harm.
You're gay because you let a trans woman fuck you.
Incorrect.
As he slowly tries to slink away. If you take a dick in
the ass you are a fag.
If Snit is confused, he can always turn around during the sodomy and ask whether that person believes themselves to be a man or a woman.
Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a016c91$0$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,The only rational voice on this that I've heard is that if it doesn't
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 10:07:18-aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446b11ef48d7796c98b69f@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a0108cc$0$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:10:12 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446ab034279cb7c098b698@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00f845$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:05:58 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa1258a6dae2298b690@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00c8ca$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Eldon Chance <nospam@in.valid> wrote:
On 09 May 2026 23:08:45 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote >>>>>>>>>>> <46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>>
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34290981
Now that is "normal" but also geographically isolated hermaphrodism of a
sort.
"When Imperato-McGinley investigated the Guevedoces she discovered the
reason they don't have male genitalia when they are born is because they
are deficient in an enzyme called 5-alpha-reductase, which normally >>>>>>>>>> converts testosterone into dihydro-testosterone.
This deficiency seems to be a genetic condition, quite common in this
part of the Dominican Republic, but vanishingly rare elsewhere." >>>>>>>>>>
By any common measure however it is a genetic miscue, albeit one that
has inspired "treatment'.
Ok.
People who don?t fit the more common binary are about as rare as redheads.
We should not criticize redheads or ask them to hide who they are. We >>>>>>>>> should not mock redheads or act like they?re somehow broken. >>>>>>>>>
Seems common sense to me, and I don?t even have red hair!
You have no argument. A redheaded trans woman is really
just a man.
Are they blonde or brunette? Fit them into a binary so you are comfortable.
Bet that point went over your head.
The only point needed is the fact that trans women are
really men.
A claim that is not backed by evidence / science.
I tend to go with evidence over you who goes with emotion. We will not see eye
to eye.
If that "trans woman" has a dick it's a male.
So you keep saying -- with no evidence or support.
None needed. Any idiot knows a person with a dick is male.
Except for the one you keep up your ass.
have a uterus it is not female. This is what Elon Musk said. You know,
he's a billionaire and takes more than 30 seconds to formulate his statements, Skeeter.
In article <6a016ccf$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 10:11:29-aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446b12f092404eb98b6a3@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a010f50$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:36:10 PM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a01085a$6$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-10 6:16 p.m., Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a00f7f9$0$44102$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:01:07 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa001cf13e36098b68c@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a0031b7$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Bill Oaks <memphis@hillbillies.org> wrote:
On 09 May 2026, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> posted some
news:69ffbe7c$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40|ore4->PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote >>>>>>>>>>> <46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>>
There's a difference between natural oddities that occur because >>>>>>>>>> of inbreeding and the self-induced due to poor decisions and lack of >>>>>>>>>> familial support.
What did the lack of support do to create bigots?
You idiots have a name for anyone that doesn't agree with
you.
It is a standard English word. Bigot. And it is the correct one.
No, it's what you use when we don't agree with you
"tolerant" liberals.
"Believe everything we say or else we will label you! Our labels are >>>>> more powerful than anything in the world. They are like kryptonite to >>>>> Superman... unless you don't mind the label, at which point our ultimate >>>>> weapon is completely impotent."
Don't let the Prescott faggot and Baked Anus believe that their labels >>>>> have any effect. Take pride in being called a bigot, an islamophobe, a >>>>> racist, a misogynist, a Nazi or whatever else these limp-wristed
leftists throw at you.
That is not at all accurate. It is if you act like a bigot it makes sense to
honestly note this. It is not labeling you, it is identifying you. And, sure,
you can take pride in your bigotry. If you really are proud to be so insecure
and irrational that is on you.
But what you are not going to do is make me feel bad for noting your lack of
tolerance tied to your insecurities. There is nothing wrong with being honest
about your harm.
You're gay because you let a trans woman fuck you.
Incorrect.
As he slowly tries to slink away. If you take a dick in
the ass you are a fag.
In article <6a016cc0$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 10:09:19-aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446b126533964bf998b6a1@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a010964$0$13959$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:14:03 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446ab111ae48fa1c98b69a@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00f8b5$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:07:29 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa17f1b531f4898b691@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00d17d$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 11:07:18 AM MST, "Eldon Chance" wrote
<20260510120718.28052f2c@z-z>:
On 10 May 2026 18:04:58 GMT
Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
Eldon Chance <nospam@in.valid> wrote:
On 09 May 2026 23:08:45 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote >>>>>>>>>>>> <46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural
trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>>>
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34290981
Now that is "normal" but also geographically isolated hermaphrodism >>>>>>>>>>> of a sort.
"When Imperato-McGinley investigated the Guevedoces she discovered >>>>>>>>>>> the reason they don't have male genitalia when they are born is >>>>>>>>>>> because they are deficient in an enzyme called 5-alpha-reductase, >>>>>>>>>>> which normally converts testosterone into dihydro-testosterone. >>>>>>>>>>>
This deficiency seems to be a genetic condition, quite common in >>>>>>>>>>> this part of the Dominican Republic, but vanishingly rare >>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere."
By any common measure however it is a genetic miscue, albeit one >>>>>>>>>>> that has inspired "treatment'.
Ok.
People who don?t fit the more common binary are about as rare as >>>>>>>>>> redheads. We should not criticize redheads or ask them to hide who >>>>>>>>>> they are. We should not mock redheads or act like they?re somehow >>>>>>>>>> broken.
Yet we do...
No. You might... "we" do not.
There is no "we" in your sour bubble.
I do not join you in ignorance. Not sour about it, just a fact. I go with
evidence.
That trans women are really men?
That trans women are trans women.
With dicks. That makes them a male.
So you say with no evidence.
Seems common sense to me, and I don?t even have red hair!
And lefties, being left-handed is a cursive curse, but also a gift if >>>>>>>>> one is a pitcher.
Sure... another uncommon trait that does not mean one is any less "valid" as a
person.
Does mean using common (right handed) scissors is a pain!
Maybe they aren't acting like something there really
aren't.
Maybe you are acting like the bigot you are.
You idiots always have a name for someone if they don't
agree with you. The fact is no matter how pretty you are
if you were born with a dick you are a male.
It is an accurate term. And you are the one using bigoted offenses terms. >>>>
Notice you just make claims based on proclamation. You have no scientific >>>> evidence to back this.
Any idiot knows if you have a dick you are a male.
Claims by proclamation are not the same as claims by evidence.
Facts is what they are. Males can't have baby s because
they have dicks.
In article <6a016c91$0$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 10:07:18-aPM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446b11ef48d7796c98b69f@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a0108cc$0$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 3:10:12 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446ab034279cb7c098b698@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00f845$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:05:58 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.446aa1258a6dae2298b690@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a00c8ca$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Eldon Chance <nospam@in.valid> wrote:
On 09 May 2026 23:08:45 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 9, 2026 at 4:06:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<46PLR.741370$o0gf.531859@fx03.iad>:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>>>>> trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
What would he do if he learned of the Guevedoces?
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34290981
Now that is "normal" but also geographically isolated hermaphrodism of a
sort.
"When Imperato-McGinley investigated the Guevedoces she discovered the
reason they don't have male genitalia when they are born is because they
are deficient in an enzyme called 5-alpha-reductase, which normally >>>>>>>>> converts testosterone into dihydro-testosterone.
This deficiency seems to be a genetic condition, quite common in this >>>>>>>>> part of the Dominican Republic, but vanishingly rare elsewhere." >>>>>>>>>
By any common measure however it is a genetic miscue, albeit one that >>>>>>>>> has inspired "treatment'.
Ok.
People who don?t fit the more common binary are about as rare as redheads.
We should not criticize redheads or ask them to hide who they are. We >>>>>>>> should not mock redheads or act like they?re somehow broken.
Seems common sense to me, and I don?t even have red hair!
You have no argument. A redheaded trans woman is really
just a man.
Are they blonde or brunette? Fit them into a binary so you are comfortable.
Bet that point went over your head.
The only point needed is the fact that trans women are
really men.
A claim that is not backed by evidence / science.
I tend to go with evidence over you who goes with emotion. We will not see eye
to eye.
If that "trans woman" has a dick it's a male.
So you keep saying -- with no evidence or support.
None needed. Any idiot knows a person with a dick is male.
Except for the one you keep up your ass.
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or
breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural
trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with
cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
On Sun, 10 May 2026 17:46:45 -0400
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomizedYou see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
regularly is equivalent to love.
I tend to concur.
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or
breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural
trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with
cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.-a They were
not people with birth defects, they were completely normal XY
individuals with transgender identity.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-05-11 1:13 a.m., Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a010899$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:46:45|e-aPM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a00fcc5$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-10 12:57 p.m., Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100%
natural trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight
women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by
design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
+1
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized
regularly is equivalent to love.
Your bigotry is the real issue.
Us not agreeing with you isn't bigotry.
Far-leftists like Snit always see themselves as the only ones capable
of judging what is moral and what isn't.
Equal rights is moral. Your demand for special entitlements is not. It|ore4raos not hard.
On 11 May 2026, Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> posted some
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-05-11 1:13 a.m., Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a010899$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:46:45|e PM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a00fcc5$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-10 12:57 p.m., Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100%
natural trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by
design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
+1
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized
regularly is equivalent to love.
Your bigotry is the real issue.
Us not agreeing with you isn't bigotry.
Far-leftists like Snit always see themselves as the only ones capable
of judging what is moral and what isn't.
Equal rights is moral. Your demand for special entitlements is not.
It|ore4raos not hard.
Not when it's applied unequally. See BLM, JDL, CHIRLA, LGBTQ, etc.
Jews and blacks are the worst when it comes to that.
On May 11, 2026 at 3:51:49rC>PM MST, "Rudy Canosa" wrote <20260512.005149.8cd43dbf@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>:
On 11 May 2026, Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> posted some
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-05-11 1:13 a.m., Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a010899$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:46:45|e PM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a00fcc5$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-10 12:57 p.m., Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by
design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
+1
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized >>>>>>> regularly is equivalent to love.
Your bigotry is the real issue.
Us not agreeing with you isn't bigotry.
Far-leftists like Snit always see themselves as the only ones capable
of judging what is moral and what isn't.
Equal rights is moral. Your demand for special entitlements is not.
It|ore4raos not hard.
Not when it's applied unequally. See BLM, JDL, CHIRLA, LGBTQ, etc.
Jews and blacks are the worst when it comes to that.
I doubt even you know what you are talking about, but I will give you one chance. What do you mean. Use specific examples, as I did with Skeeter.
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 11, 2026 at 3:51:49rC>PM MST, "Rudy Canosa" wroteThat's one chance too many.
<20260512.005149.8cd43dbf@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>:
On 11 May 2026, Brock McNuggets <Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com> posted some
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-05-11 1:13 a.m., Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a010899$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 10, 2026 at 2:46:45|e PM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a00fcc5$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-10 12:57 p.m., Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by
design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
+1
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized >>>>>>>> regularly is equivalent to love.
Your bigotry is the real issue.
Us not agreeing with you isn't bigotry.
Far-leftists like Snit always see themselves as the only ones capable >>>>> of judging what is moral and what isn't.
Equal rights is moral. Your demand for special entitlements is not.
It|ore4raos not hard.
Not when it's applied unequally. See BLM, JDL, CHIRLA, LGBTQ, etc.
Jews and blacks are the worst when it comes to that.
I doubt even you know what you are talking about, but I will give you one
chance. What do you mean. Use specific examples, as I did with Skeeter.
Next thing you know Fozzard Rudy will be
calling you a Jew, finding out which newsgroup you frequent and fully populating it with him and people who hate him that follow him like the Protoss follow the Zerg.
Jews and blacks are the worsthttps://groups.google.com/g/alt.california/c/XA7m_li-twM/m/lAW3nSvtbLcJ Immigration Man
On 5/10/2026 6:46 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2026 17:46:45 -0400
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomizedYou see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
regularly is equivalent to love.
I tend to concur.
Your obsession over anal intercourse gives away your stupidity and immaturity.-a Retard.
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or
breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural
trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with
cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.-a They were
not people with birth defects, they were completely normal XY
individuals with transgender identity.
On 5/11/26 11:06 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 6:46 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2026 17:46:45 -0400
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomizedYou see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
regularly is equivalent to love.
I tend to concur.
Your obsession over anal intercourse gives away your stupidity and
immaturity.-a Retard.
But aren't you an actual sodomite?
As opposed to a commentator.
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or
breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural
trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with
cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.-a They were
not people with birth defects, they were completely normal XY
individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is becoming
more numerous.
On 5/14/2026 3:29 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:06 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 6:46 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2026 17:46:45 -0400
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomizedYou see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
regularly is equivalent to love.
I tend to concur.
Your obsession over anal intercourse gives away your stupidity and
immaturity.-a Retard.
But aren't you an actual sodomite?
As opposed to a commentator.
Are you hung up about sex?
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or
breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>> trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with
cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.-a They
were not people with birth defects, they were completely normal XY
individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is becoming
more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
- trans identity isn't something
most people experience, but those who do should be treated as human beings.
On 5/14/26 2:37 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:29 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:06 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 6:46 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2026 17:46:45 -0400
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomizedYou see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
regularly is equivalent to love.
I tend to concur.
Your obsession over anal intercourse gives away your stupidity and
immaturity.-a Retard.
But aren't you an actual sodomite?
As opposed to a commentator.
Are you hung up about sex?
You're the one demonstrating said.
Sodomize or be sodomized as you please, matters not to me.
zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:37 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:29 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:06 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 6:46 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2026 17:46:45 -0400
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized >>>>>>> regularly is equivalent to love.You see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
I tend to concur.
Your obsession over anal intercourse gives away your stupidity and
immaturity.-a Retard.
But aren't you an actual sodomite?
As opposed to a commentator.
Are you hung up about sex?
You're the one demonstrating said.
Sodomize or be sodomized as you please, matters not to me.
I'm curious what provoked you to ask the question then?
Do you have
bedbugs or something that make you itch and say stuff you don't remember saying?
On 5/14/26 2:37 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:29 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:06 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 6:46 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2026 17:46:45 -0400
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomizedYou see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
regularly is equivalent to love.
I tend to concur.
Your obsession over anal intercourse gives away your stupidity and
immaturity.-a Retard.
But aren't you an actual sodomite?
As opposed to a commentator.
Are you hung up about sex?
You're the one demonstrating said.
Sodomize or be sodomized as you please, matters not to me.
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>> trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.-a They
were not people with birth defects, they were completely normal XY
individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is becoming
more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average." Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those who
do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
I read back through his poasts and they are all very trans focused.
He even has a hot trans model he's infatuated with.
That lifestyle generally includes lots of anal sex.
On 5/14/2026 6:13 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:37 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:29 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:06 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 6:46 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2026 17:46:45 -0400
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized >>>>>>> regularly is equivalent to love.You see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
I tend to concur.
Your obsession over anal intercourse gives away your stupidity and
immaturity.-a Retard.
But aren't you an actual sodomite?
As opposed to a commentator.
Are you hung up about sex?
You're the one demonstrating said.
Sodomize or be sodomized as you please, matters not to me.
You can type the word "sodomize" all you want, it doesn't mean anything.
-aAnal sex is common even among cisgender heterosexual couples.
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>> trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design. >>>>>>
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.-a They
were not people with birth defects, they were completely normal XY
individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is usual,
ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or behaviors that
conform to a standard, pattern, or average." Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children
into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those
who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
You aren't very good at this.
On 5/14/2026 6:32 PM, zendejo wrote:
I read back through his poasts and they are all very trans focused.
He even has a hot trans model he's infatuated with.
That lifestyle generally includes lots of anal sex.
I am in love with a trans woman, she is a top, and I am a bottom.
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's hetero sex
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
On 5/14/26 4:42 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:13 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:37 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:29 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:06 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 6:46 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2026 17:46:45 -0400
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized >>>>>>>> regularly is equivalent to love.You see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
I tend to concur.
Your obsession over anal intercourse gives away your stupidity and >>>>>> immaturity.-a Retard.
But aren't you an actual sodomite?
As opposed to a commentator.
Are you hung up about sex?
You're the one demonstrating said.
Sodomize or be sodomized as you please, matters not to me.
You can type the word "sodomize" all you want, it doesn't mean anything.
Of course it does, both mechanically and legally.
AI Overview
sodomized
To be sodomized is to be the recipient or passive partner in anal or
oral sex. The term is the past tense form of the verb sodomize, which is
the act of performing sodomy on someone.
- Dictionary.com
Consensual Acts: While consensual anal and oral sex between adults are widely legal, they historically fell under "sodomy laws" in many jurisdictions, which historically criminalized the behavior altogether.
Non-Consensual Acts: When the act is committed by force, against
someone's will, or with someone incapable of consent, it is classified
as a severe felony (such as sexual assault or aggravated sodomy).
-aAnal sex is common even among cisgender heterosexual couples.
I would not imbue it as "common" at all.
AI Overview
Frequency: Those who identify as straight report having anal sex an
average of 1.9 times per month.
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>> trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design. >>>>>>>
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.-a They >>>>>> were not people with birth defects, they were completely normal XY >>>>>> individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is usual, >>> ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or behaviors
that conform to a standard, pattern, or average." Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children
into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those
who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
You aren't very good at this.
Lol.
AI Overview
The adult population (age 18 and older) in the United States is approximately 276.8 million, representing roughly 78% of the total U.S. population of about 342.5 million.
Now let's have you express 527 as a percentage of 277 million.
(527 is 0.000190253% of 277 million)
On 5/14/26 4:48 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:32 PM, zendejo wrote:
I read back through his poasts and they are all very trans focused.
He even has a hot trans model he's infatuated with.
That lifestyle generally includes lots of anal sex.
I am in love with a trans woman, she is a top, and I am a bottom.
Yes, so?
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's hetero
sex that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of the opposite sex or gender."
On 5/11/26 11:06 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 6:46 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2026 17:46:45 -0400
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomizedYou see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
regularly is equivalent to love.
I tend to concur.
Your obsession over anal intercourse gives away your stupidity and
immaturity.-a Retard.
But aren't you an actual sodomite?
As opposed to a commentator.
On 5/14/26 4:42 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:13 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:37 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:29 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:06 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 6:46 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2026 17:46:45 -0400
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized >>>>>>>> regularly is equivalent to love.You see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
I tend to concur.
Your obsession over anal intercourse gives away your stupidity and >>>>>> immaturity.-a Retard.
But aren't you an actual sodomite?
As opposed to a commentator.
Are you hung up about sex?
You're the one demonstrating said.
Sodomize or be sodomized as you please, matters not to me.
You can type the word "sodomize" all you want, it doesn't mean anything.
Of course it does, both mechanically and legally.
AI Overview
sodomized
To be sodomized is to be the recipient or passive partner in anal or
oral sex. The term is the past tense form of the verb sodomize, which is
the act of performing sodomy on someone.
- Dictionary.com
Consensual Acts: While consensual anal and oral sex between adults are widely legal, they historically fell under "sodomy laws" in many jurisdictions, which historically criminalized the behavior altogether.
Non-Consensual Acts: When the act is committed by force, against
someone's will, or with someone incapable of consent, it is classified
as a severe felony (such as sexual assault or aggravated sodomy).
-aAnal sex is common even among cisgender heterosexual couples.
I would not imbue it as "common" at all.
AI Overview
Frequency: Those who identify as straight report having anal sex an
average of 1.9 times per month.
On 5/14/26 4:48 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:32 PM, zendejo wrote:
I read back through his poasts and they are all very trans focused.
He even has a hot trans model he's infatuated with.
That lifestyle generally includes lots of anal sex.
I am in love with a trans woman, she is a top, and I am a bottom.
Yes, so?
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's hetero sex
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of the opposite sex or gender."
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs >>>>>>>>>>> or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100%
natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by
design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.-a
They were not people with birth defects, they were completely
normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is
usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children
into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those
who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
On 5/14/2026 7:24 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 4:42 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:13 PM, zendejo wrote:Of course it does, both mechanically and legally.
On 5/14/26 2:37 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:29 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:06 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 6:46 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2026 17:46:45 -0400
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized >>>>>>>>> regularly is equivalent to love.You see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
I tend to concur.
Your obsession over anal intercourse gives away your stupidity
and immaturity.-a Retard.
But aren't you an actual sodomite?
As opposed to a commentator.
Are you hung up about sex?
You're the one demonstrating said.
Sodomize or be sodomized as you please, matters not to me.
You can type the word "sodomize" all you want, it doesn't mean anything. >>
AI Overview
sodomized
To be sodomized is to be the recipient or passive partner in anal or
oral sex. The term is the past tense form of the verb sodomize, which
is the act of performing sodomy on someone.
- Dictionary.com
Consensual Acts: While consensual anal and oral sex between adults are
widely legal, they historically fell under "sodomy laws" in many
jurisdictions, which historically criminalized the behavior altogether.
Non-Consensual Acts: When the act is committed by force, against
someone's will, or with someone incapable of consent, it is classified
as a severe felony (such as sexual assault or aggravated sodomy).
Yeah?-a Wow.-a Welcome to 2003 when the Supreme Court overturned sodomy laws.-a Duh.
-aAnal sex is common even among cisgender heterosexual couples.
I would not imbue it as "common" at all.
AI Overview
Frequency: Those who identify as straight report having anal sex an
average of 1.9 times per month.
That literally means it is commonly done, are you that bad at
interpreting statistics?
On 5/14/2026 7:28 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or >>>>>>>>>>>> breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural >>>>>>>>>>> trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with >>>>>>>>>>> cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by design. >>>>>>>>
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.-a They >>>>>>> were not people with birth defects, they were completely normal >>>>>>> XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is
usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children
into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Why not?-a How many does it take to be "expected", FFS?-a You're being dismissive of literal human beings.
- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those
who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
You aren't very good at this.
Lol.
AI Overview
The adult population (age 18 and older) in the United States is
approximately 276.8 million, representing roughly 78% of the total
U.S. population of about 342.5 million.
Now let's have you express 527 as a percentage of 277 million.
(527 is 0.000190253% of 277 million)
How does 527 compare to zero, though?-a Duh?
On 5/14/2026 7:30 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 4:48 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:32 PM, zendejo wrote:
I read back through his poasts and they are all very trans focused.
He even has a hot trans model he's infatuated with.
That lifestyle generally includes lots of anal sex.
I am in love with a trans woman, she is a top, and I am a bottom.
Yes, so?
It reflects her sane decision not to have her balls cut off and her dick sliced like a Five Guys hot dog, to be formed into something resembling
a vagina, as well as my liking dick up my ass.
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's hetero
sex that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic attraction,
activity, or relationships between individuals of the opposite sex or
gender."
She is a female with a male body, it's hetero.
On 2026-05-14 7:24 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 4:42 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:13 PM, zendejo wrote:Of course it does, both mechanically and legally.
On 5/14/26 2:37 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:29 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:06 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 6:46 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2026 17:46:45 -0400
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Joel is just trying to make himself believe that being sodomized >>>>>>>>> regularly is equivalent to love.You see hims as a catcher, not a pitcher?
I tend to concur.
Your obsession over anal intercourse gives away your stupidity
and immaturity.-a Retard.
But aren't you an actual sodomite?
As opposed to a commentator.
Are you hung up about sex?
You're the one demonstrating said.
Sodomize or be sodomized as you please, matters not to me.
You can type the word "sodomize" all you want, it doesn't mean anything. >>
AI Overview
sodomized
To be sodomized is to be the recipient or passive partner in anal or
oral sex. The term is the past tense form of the verb sodomize, which
is the act of performing sodomy on someone.
- Dictionary.com
Consensual Acts: While consensual anal and oral sex between adults are
widely legal, they historically fell under "sodomy laws" in many
jurisdictions, which historically criminalized the behavior altogether.
Non-Consensual Acts: When the act is committed by force, against
someone's will, or with someone incapable of consent, it is classified
as a severe felony (such as sexual assault or aggravated sodomy).
-aAnal sex is common even among cisgender heterosexual couples.
I would not imbue it as "common" at all.
AI Overview
Frequency: Those who identify as straight report having anal sex an
average of 1.9 times per month.
The word sodomy has been around for as long as there has been
civilization. Who the heck is this sodomite trying to fool?
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs >>>>>>>>>>>> or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by
design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.
They were not people with birth defects, they were completely
normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is
usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children
into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those
who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
On 5/14/26 5:56 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 7:30 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 4:48 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:32 PM, zendejo wrote:
I read back through his poasts and they are all very trans focused.
He even has a hot trans model he's infatuated with.
That lifestyle generally includes lots of anal sex.
I am in love with a trans woman, she is a top, and I am a bottom.
Yes, so?
It reflects her sane decision not to have her balls cut off and her
dick sliced like a Five Guys hot dog, to be formed into something
resembling a vagina, as well as my liking dick up my ass.
Sounds like two gay guys doing non surgical dress up.
No.There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's hetero
sex that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic
attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of the
opposite sex or gender."
She is a female with a male body, it's hetero.
She is a male with a synthetic hormone fueled pseudo-female body.
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's hetero sex
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic attraction, >activity, or relationships between individuals of the opposite sex or >gender."
1.9 times a month is "common"?
That's not so.
"Average Frequency: Adults in their 20s typically have sex 2u3 times per >week, or roughly 8u12 times per month."
It's uncommon numerically.
The word sodomy has been around for as long as there has been
civilization. Who the heck is this sodomite trying to fool?
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs >>>>>>>>>>>> or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by
design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.
They were not people with birth defects, they were completely
normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is
usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children
into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those
who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists are asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's hetero sex
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic attraction,
activity, or relationships between individuals of the opposite sex or
gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one, apparently.
CrudeSausage wrote:
The word sodomy has been around for as long as there has been
civilization. Who the heck is this sodomite trying to fool?
You are wondering why a troll takes the wrong side of pretty-much
every issue? To get responses, of course.
zendejo wrote:
1.9 times a month is "common"?
That's not so.
"Average Frequency: Adults in their 20s typically have sex 2rCo3 times per >> week, or roughly 8rCo12 times per month."
It's uncommon numerically.
Uncommon among most people, period. I'd be willing to bet that that
average of 1.9 times per month is skewed by a small number of
butt-hole fans who do it regularly, against most people who do it
rarely if at all.
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:ordinary,
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs >>>>>>>>>>>>> or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by
design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.
They were not people with birth defects, they were completely
normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is
usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children
into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
areNobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those >>>>>> who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs >>>>>>>>>>>>> or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by
design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.
They were not people with birth defects, they were completely
normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is
usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children
into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is ordinary, everything else is societal waste.
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists are asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those >>>>>> who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote <6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists are
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special entitlements.
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists are >>> asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special
entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is "special treatment" - that doesn't make it so. When he claims my GF is a man,
calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of baloney, here,
he's not granting her equality, he's denying her treatment as a
dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
On May 15, 2026 at 6:47:16rC>AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <EtFNR.468226$d5bf.94153@fx07.iad>:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists are >>>> asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special
entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is "special
treatment" - that doesn't make it so. When he claims my GF is a man,
calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of baloney, here,
he's not granting her equality, he's denying her treatment as a
dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
Full of insecurities and self doubt... but not man enough to face it so he lashes out with hatred and anger.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:ordinary,
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>> design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.
They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is
usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children >>>>>> into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
areNobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those >>>>>>> who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchair
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 6:47:16rC>AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wroteWell, Crude is a unique case. He regularly makes such ludicrous
<EtFNR.468226$d5bf.94153@fx07.iad>:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
-a-a-a-a-a-a Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the
leftists are
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they >>>>> are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding >>>>> special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special >>>> entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is "special
treatment" - that doesn't make it so.-a When he claims my GF is a man,
calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of baloney, here,
he's not granting her equality, he's denying her treatment as a
dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
Full of insecurities and self doubt... but not man enough to face it
so he
lashes out with hatred and anger.
proposals for the Republicans that I occasionally think he is secretly a Democrat.
On 5/15/2026 12:30 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 5:56 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 7:30 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 4:48 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:32 PM, zendejo wrote:
I read back through his poasts and they are all very trans focused. >>>>>>
He even has a hot trans model he's infatuated with.
That lifestyle generally includes lots of anal sex.
I am in love with a trans woman, she is a top, and I am a bottom.
Yes, so?
It reflects her sane decision not to have her balls cut off and her
dick sliced like a Five Guys hot dog, to be formed into something
resembling a vagina, as well as my liking dick up my ass.
Sounds like two gay guys doing non surgical dress up.
She isn't a guy.
No.There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's hetero >>>>> sex that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic
attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of the
opposite sex or gender."
She is a female with a male body, it's hetero.
She is a male with a synthetic hormone fueled pseudo-female body.
She hasn't taken the hormones.-a She's gorgeous while being basically all natural.
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's hetero sex
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic attraction,
activity, or relationships between individuals of the opposite sex or
gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one, apparently.
zendejo wrote:
1.9 times a month is "common"?
That's not so.
"Average Frequency: Adults in their 20s typically have sex 2rCo3 times per >> week, or roughly 8rCo12 times per month."
It's uncommon numerically.
Uncommon among most people, period. I'd be willing to bet that that
average of 1.9 times per month is skewed by a small number of
butt-hole fans who do it regularly, against most people who do it
rarely if at all.
CrudeSausage wrote:
The word sodomy has been around for as long as there has been
civilization. Who the heck is this sodomite trying to fool?
You are wondering why a troll takes the wrong side of pretty-much
every issue? To get responses, of course.
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs >>>>>>>>>>>>> or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by
design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.
They were not people with birth defects, they were completely
normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is
usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children
into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
-a-a-a-a Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is ordinary, everything else is societal waste.
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists are asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those >>>>>> who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
-a-a-a-a Why does that matter?
-a-a-a-a Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's hetero sex >>>> that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic attraction,
activity, or relationships between individuals of the opposite sex or
gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one, apparently.
Idiot.-a It's truth.-a You're too stupid to see that.
On 5/15/2026 7:00 AM, chrisv wrote:
zendejo wrote:
1.9 times a month is "common"?
That's not so.
"Average Frequency: Adults in their 20s typically have sex 2rCo3 times per >>> week, or roughly 8rCo12 times per month."
It's uncommon numerically.
Uncommon among most people, period.-a I'd be willing to bet that that
average of 1.9 times per month is skewed by a small number of
butt-hole fans who do it regularly, against most people who do it
rarely if at all.
Chris imagines he knows "most people, period" as usual, making shit up, wrong as hell.-a Anal sex is quite common among all kinds of couples.
On 5/15/2026 7:02 AM, chrisv wrote:
CrudeSausage wrote:
The word sodomy has been around for as long as there has been
civilization. Who the heck is this sodomite trying to fool?
You are wondering why a troll takes the wrong side of pretty-much
every issue?-a To get responses, of course.
You're the one who's wrong, little boy.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:ordinary,
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>> design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.
They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is
usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children >>>>>> into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
areNobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those >>>>>>> who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchairTrans need no special ramps or parking spaces.
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote <6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>> design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.
They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is
usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children >>>>>> into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is ordinary,
everything else is societal waste.
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists are- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those >>>>>>> who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special entitlements.
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
-a-a-a-a-a Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists are >>> asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special
entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is "special treatment" - that doesn't make it so.-a When he claims my GF is a man,
calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of baloney, here,
he's not granting her equality, he's denying her treatment as a
dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
On 2026-05-15 9:14 a.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:ordinary,
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>>> design.
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>>
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said. >>>>>>>>>> They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is >>>>>>>>> becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is >>>>>>> usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children >>>>>>> into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
-a-a-a-a-a Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
areNobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those >>>>>>>> who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
-a-a-a-a-a Why does that matter?
-a-a-a-a-a Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchair
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
If you can provide evidence that transsexuals will be content with wheelchair ramps, handicapped parking and wide bathroom stalls rather
than access to the same locker rooms as little girls and women and the
right to play sports against them despite being stronger and taller,
I'll gladly retract my statement.
On 5/15/26 1:38 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 12:30 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 5:56 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 7:30 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 4:48 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:32 PM, zendejo wrote:
I read back through his poasts and they are all very trans focused. >>>>>>>
He even has a hot trans model he's infatuated with.
That lifestyle generally includes lots of anal sex.
I am in love with a trans woman, she is a top, and I am a bottom.
Yes, so?
It reflects her sane decision not to have her balls cut off and her
dick sliced like a Five Guys hot dog, to be formed into something
resembling a vagina, as well as my liking dick up my ass.
Sounds like two gay guys doing non surgical dress up.
She isn't a guy.
"She" most certainly came out of the womb as one.
No.There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's
hetero sex that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic
attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of the
opposite sex or gender."
She is a female with a male body, it's hetero.
She is a male with a synthetic hormone fueled pseudo-female body.
She hasn't taken the hormones.-a She's gorgeous while being basically
all natural.
Most men can't push out large breasts like that, implants then?
On 5/15/26 4:55 AM, chrisv wrote:
zendejo wrote:Honestly if you back track the postings there is credibility of the principals, if it's an act, so be it.
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's hetero sex >>>> that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic attraction,
activity, or relationships between individuals of the opposite sex or
gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one, apparently.
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis.
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's hetero >>>>> sex
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic attraction, >>>> activity, or relationships between individuals of the opposite sex or
gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one, apparently.
Idiot.-a It's truth.-a You're too stupid to see that.
You have an obvious nested agenda.
On 5/15/26 7:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
-a-a-a-a-a Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists
are
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special
entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is
"special treatment" - that doesn't make it so.-a When he claims my GF
is a man, calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of
baloney, here, he's not granting her equality, he's denying her
treatment as a dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
You need to understand that true freedom includes the right for his
views to publicly contradict your own.
That he speaks with some passion on the matter is what has drawn your ire.
Try not to have such a soft shell.
Life is a messy proposition even at the actual norms.
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story hours.
On 5/15/26 7:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:You need to understand that true freedom includes the right for his
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
-a-a-a-a-a Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists
are
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special
entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is
"special treatment" - that doesn't make it so.-a When he claims my GF
is a man, calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of
baloney, here, he's not granting her equality, he's denying her
treatment as a dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
views to publicly contradict your own.
That he speaks with some passion on the matter is what has drawn your ire.
Try not to have such a soft shell.
Life is a messy proposition even at the actual norms.
On 5/15/26 7:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:You need to understand that true freedom includes the right for his
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists are >>>> asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special
entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is "special
treatment" - that doesn't make it so. When he claims my GF is a man,
calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of baloney, here,
he's not granting her equality, he's denying her treatment as a
dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
views to publicly contradict your own.
That he speaks with some passion on the matter is what has drawn your ire.--
Try not to have such a soft shell.
Life is a messy proposition even at the actual norms.
On 2026-05-15 11:32 a.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 7:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists >>>>> are
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they >>>>> are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding >>>>> special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special >>>> entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is
"special treatment" - that doesn't make it so. When he claims my GF
is a man, calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of
baloney, here, he's not granting her equality, he's denying her
treatment as a dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
Joel admits to getting it up the ass and enjoying, but wonders why I
would call him a faggot. You can't make this up.
--You need to understand that true freedom includes the right for his
views to publicly contradict your own.
That he speaks with some passion on the matter is what has drawn your ire. >>
Try not to have such a soft shell.
Life is a messy proposition even at the actual norms.
Faggots need to go back in the closet. That's what I think. We've
tolerated enough; they just always demand more.
On May 15, 2026 at 8:47:36rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote <6a074018$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-15 11:32 a.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 7:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists >>>>>> are
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they >>>>>> are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding >>>>>> special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special >>>>> entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is
"special treatment" - that doesn't make it so. When he claims my GF
is a man, calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of
baloney, here, he's not granting her equality, he's denying her
treatment as a dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
Joel admits to getting it up the ass and enjoying, but wonders why I
would call him a faggot. You can't make this up.
You wonder why people would not want to have you call the derogatory names... which is a weakness in you, not your targets.
You need to understand that true freedom includes the right for his
views to publicly contradict your own.
That he speaks with some passion on the matter is what has drawn your ire. >>>
Try not to have such a soft shell.
Life is a messy proposition even at the actual norms.
Faggots need to go back in the closet. That's what I think. We've
tolerated enough; they just always demand more.
On 5/15/2026 12:48 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 8:47:36rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a074018$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-15 11:32 a.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 7:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists >>>>>>> are
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they >>>>>>> are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding >>>>>>> special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special >>>>>> entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is
"special treatment" - that doesn't make it so. When he claims my GF >>>>> is a man, calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of
baloney, here, he's not granting her equality, he's denying her
treatment as a dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
Joel admits to getting it up the ass and enjoying, but wonders why I
would call him a faggot. You can't make this up.
You wonder why people would not want to have you call the derogatory names...
which is a weakness in you, not your targets.
He's proving why I'm the one winning the debate, is the irony, the
Usenet audience can be whatever he imagines it to be but the rational
people are going to see that I'm in the right.
You need to understand that true freedom includes the right for his
views to publicly contradict your own.
That he speaks with some passion on the matter is what has drawn your ire. >>>>
Try not to have such a soft shell.
Life is a messy proposition even at the actual norms.
Faggots need to go back in the closet. That's what I think. We've
tolerated enough; they just always demand more.
You will tolerate it and learn to appreciate it, before this world's--
through, little man.
On May 15, 2026 at 9:57:42rC>AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <9gINR.2153143$4wI6.1532163@fx24.iad>:
On 5/15/2026 12:48 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 8:47:36rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a074018$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-15 11:32 a.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 7:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists >>>>>>>> are
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they >>>>>>>> are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding >>>>>>>> special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special >>>>>>> entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is
"special treatment" - that doesn't make it so. When he claims my GF >>>>>> is a man, calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of
baloney, here, he's not granting her equality, he's denying her
treatment as a dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
Joel admits to getting it up the ass and enjoying, but wonders why I
would call him a faggot. You can't make this up.
You wonder why people would not want to have you call the derogatory names...
which is a weakness in you, not your targets.
He's proving why I'm the one winning the debate, is the irony, the
Usenet audience can be whatever he imagines it to be but the rational
people are going to see that I'm in the right.
Right. So many of the MAGA types see ""winning" as getting their own irrational group celebrating. My goal -- and yours -- is to be accurate and (mostly) kind. Completely different goals.
On 2026-05-15 9:14 a.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:wigs
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their
straightor breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just
children1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>>> design.What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>>women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said. >>>>>>>>>> They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is >>>>>>>>> becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is >>>>>>> usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
thoseordinary,into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but
areNobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftistswho do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchair
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
If you can provide evidence that transsexuals will be content with wheelchair ramps, handicapped parking and wide bathroom stalls rather
than access to the same locker rooms as little girls and women and the
right to play sports against them despite being stronger and taller,
I'll gladly retract my statement.
On 5/15/26 7:14 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:wigs
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their
straightor breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just
children1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>>> design.What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>>women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said. >>>>>>>>>> They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is >>>>>>>>> becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is >>>>>>> usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
ordinary,into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
Beef that out with the Pharisees and Rome.
Certainly it's not hard to say the lives of Christ and his disciples
were ill-valued by the religion (s) of the day.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a073bc9$0$20 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:14 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:wigs
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their
straightor breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.|e-a No breasts, no nothing, just
childrenYou are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said. >>>>>>>>>>> They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>>>> design.What?|e-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>>>women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration. >>>>>>>>>>>
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is >>>>>>>>>> becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/|i-an|a-|rm(|erao)l/Normal generally describes something that is
usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or >>>>>>>> behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
ordinary,into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
Beef that out with the Pharisees and Rome.
Certainly it's not hard to say the lives of Christ and his disciples
were ill-valued by the religion (s) of the day.
Evasion noted.
Is the confirmed bachelor lifestyle
(like Jesus) a "societal waste" NOW?
On 5/15/26 7:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wroteAnd even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story hours.
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>>> design.
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>>
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wigs or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just >>>>>>>>>>>>>> straight women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said. >>>>>>>>>> They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is >>>>>>>>> becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that
is usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states,
or behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
children into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
ordinary, everything else is societal waste.
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but
those who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
are asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because
they are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while
demanding special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want
special entitlements.
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in age-appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in news:yeHNR.82810$112.55088 @fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in
age-appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
Many of us grew up watching the
cross-dressing Bugs Bunny and Elmer
Fudd and Daffy Duck and still held
on to our hetero orientations.
Then we sat thru Tootie and Ms
Doubtfire and Ru Paul and Birdcage
and still didn't get "recruited into
the gay lifestyle"
Even the drag shows of JD Vance
and Rudy Guiliani didn't convert us.
So where does this "recruitment"
kick in?
chrisv wrote:
CrudeSausage wrote:You are sounding righter as we go.
The word sodomy has been around for as long as there has been
civilization. Who the heck is this sodomite trying to fool?
You are wondering why a troll takes the wrong side of pretty-much
every issue? To get responses, of course.
Joel W. Crump wrote:
chrisv wrote:
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's hetero sex >>>>> that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic attraction, >>>> activity, or relationships between individuals of the opposite sex or
gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one, apparently.
Idiot.a It's truth.a You're too stupid to see that.
True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis.
You have an obvious nested agenda.
zendejo wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
chrisv wrote:
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's hetero sex >>>>>> that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic attraction, >>>>> activity, or relationships between individuals of the opposite sex or >>>>> gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one, apparently.
Idiot.-a It's truth.-a You're too stupid to see that.
Sure. And men can get pregnant. /s
True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis.
You have an obvious nested agenda.
He's a kook.
On 5/15/2026 1:23 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 9:57:42rC>AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<9gINR.2153143$4wI6.1532163@fx24.iad>:
On 5/15/2026 12:48 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 8:47:36rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a074018$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-15 11:32 a.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 7:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists >>>>>>>>> are
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they >>>>>>>>> are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding >>>>>>>>> special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special >>>>>>>> entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is
"special treatment" - that doesn't make it so. When he claims my GF >>>>>>> is a man, calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of >>>>>>> baloney, here, he's not granting her equality, he's denying her
treatment as a dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
Joel admits to getting it up the ass and enjoying, but wonders why I >>>>> would call him a faggot. You can't make this up.
You wonder why people would not want to have you call the derogatory names...
which is a weakness in you, not your targets.
He's proving why I'm the one winning the debate, is the irony, the
Usenet audience can be whatever he imagines it to be but the rational
people are going to see that I'm in the right.
Right. So many of the MAGA types see ""winning" as getting their own
irrational group celebrating. My goal -- and yours -- is to be accurate and >> (mostly) kind. Completely different goals.
He needs my "admitting to getting it up the ass and enjoying" to have a special, pejorative value. This is only in his own mind, however.
Psychology shows that I'm winning, because I'm not afraid of being
called a fag. I'm merely exposing what I like to do, publicly, and it
shocks him, because of his insecurity about homosexuality.
On 5/15/2026 11:20 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 1:38 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 12:30 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 5:56 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 7:30 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 4:48 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:32 PM, zendejo wrote:Yes, so?
I read back through his poasts and they are all very trans focused. >>>>>>>>
He even has a hot trans model he's infatuated with.
That lifestyle generally includes lots of anal sex.
I am in love with a trans woman, she is a top, and I am a bottom. >>>>>>
It reflects her sane decision not to have her balls cut off and her >>>>> dick sliced like a Five Guys hot dog, to be formed into something
resembling a vagina, as well as my liking dick up my ass.
Sounds like two gay guys doing non surgical dress up.
She isn't a guy.
"She" most certainly came out of the womb as one.
This would be why they say "assigned male at birth", at that stage of development there's nothing to indicate they're transgender.
No.There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it'sYou're making up your own definitions again.
hetero sex that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be. >>>>>>
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic
attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of the >>>>>> opposite sex or gender."
She is a female with a male body, it's hetero.
She is a male with a synthetic hormone fueled pseudo-female body.
She hasn't taken the hormones.-a She's gorgeous while being basically
all natural.
Most men can't push out large breasts like that, implants then?
Yes, collagen.-a They look remarkably real, though.
On 5/15/2026 11:22 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 4:55 AM, chrisv wrote:
zendejo wrote:Honestly if you back track the postings there is credibility of the
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's hetero >>>>> sex
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic attraction, >>>> activity, or relationships between individuals of the opposite sex or
gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one, apparently.
principals, if it's an act, so be it.
I know it sounds weird for Usenet, people like me are supposed to be
younger Gen Z whatever people, but in fact there are people older than I
am who are coming out as trans.-a I liked what I saw with trans women so
I pursued meeting one.
On 5/15/2026 11:25 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis.
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's
hetero sex
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic attraction, >>>>> activity, or relationships between individuals of the opposite sex or >>>>> gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one, apparently.
Idiot.-a It's truth.-a You're too stupid to see that.
You have an obvious nested agenda.
The only agenda is to educate people about the validity of trans identity.
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in age- appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
On 5/15/2026 11:32 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 7:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:You need to understand that true freedom includes the right for his
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
-a-a-a-a-a Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the
leftists are
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they >>>>> are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding >>>>> special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special >>>> entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is
"special treatment" - that doesn't make it so.-a When he claims my GF
is a man, calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of
baloney, here, he's not granting her equality, he's denying her
treatment as a dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
views to publicly contradict your own.
That he speaks with some passion on the matter is what has drawn your
ire.
Try not to have such a soft shell.
Life is a messy proposition even at the actual norms.
I don't have a soft shell.
On May 15, 2026 at 8:32:15rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a073c7f$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/15/26 7:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:You need to understand that true freedom includes the right for his
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists are >>>>> asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they >>>>> are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding >>>>> special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special >>>> entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is "special
treatment" - that doesn't make it so. When he claims my GF is a man,
calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of baloney, here,
he's not granting her equality, he's denying her treatment as a
dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
views to publicly contradict your own.
People have the right to different opinions. They even have the right to be wrong -- to contradict evidence and reason and logic. They even have the right
to be against equal rights -- what they do not have the (moral) right to do is
to work to stop equal rights.
That he speaks with some passion on the matter is what has drawn your ire. >>
Try not to have such a soft shell.
Life is a messy proposition even at the actual norms.
Faggots need to go back in the closet. That's what I think. We've
tolerated enough; they just always demand more.
You will tolerate it and learn to appreciate it, before this world's through, little man.
On 5/15/2026 1:23 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 9:57:42rC>AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<9gINR.2153143$4wI6.1532163@fx24.iad>:
On 5/15/2026 12:48 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 8:47:36rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a074018$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-15 11:32 a.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 7:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the >>>>>>>>> leftists
are
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment
because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while
demanding
special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want >>>>>>>> special
entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is
"special treatment" - that doesn't make it so.-a When he claims my GF >>>>>>> is a man, calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of >>>>>>> baloney, here, he's not granting her equality, he's denying her
treatment as a dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
Joel admits to getting it up the ass and enjoying, but wonders why I >>>>> would call him a faggot. You can't make this up.
You wonder why people would not want to have you call the derogatory
names...
which is a weakness in you, not your targets.
He's proving why I'm the one winning the debate, is the irony, the
Usenet audience can be whatever he imagines it to be but the rational
people are going to see that I'm in the right.
Right. So many of the MAGA types see ""winning" as getting their own
irrational group celebrating. My goal -- and yours -- is to be
accurate and
(mostly) kind. Completely different goals.
He needs my "admitting to getting it up the ass and enjoying" to have a special, pejorative value.-a This is only in his own mind, however. Psychology shows that I'm winning, because I'm not afraid of being
called a fag.-a I'm merely exposing what I like to do, publicly, and it shocks him, because of his insecurity about homosexuality.
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a073bc9$0$20 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:14 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:wigs
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their
straightor breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just
childrenYou are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said. >>>>>>>>>>> They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>>>> design.What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>>>women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration. >>>>>>>>>>>
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is >>>>>>>>>> becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is >>>>>>>> usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or >>>>>>>> behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
ordinary,into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
Beef that out with the Pharisees and Rome.
Certainly it's not hard to say the lives of Christ and his disciples
were ill-valued by the religion (s) of the day.
Evasion noted.
Is the confirmed bachelor lifestyle
(like Jesus) a "societal waste" NOW?
zendejo wrote:
chrisv wrote:
CrudeSausage wrote:You are sounding righter as we go.
The word sodomy has been around for as long as there has been
civilization. Who the heck is this sodomite trying to fool?
You are wondering why a troll takes the wrong side of pretty-much
every issue? To get responses, of course.
A stopped clock is right twice as often as Joel the troll.
And men can get pregnant.-a-a /s
Transgender men can, yes.-a Why is that surprising?-a They have a uterus,
On May 15, 2026 at 10:49:41rC>AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <V0JNR.1434918$Zve6.559736@fx18.iad>:
On 5/15/2026 1:23 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 9:57:42rC>AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<9gINR.2153143$4wI6.1532163@fx24.iad>:
On 5/15/2026 12:48 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 8:47:36rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a074018$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-15 11:32 a.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 7:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists >>>>>>>>>> are
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding >>>>>>>>>> special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special
entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is >>>>>>>> "special treatment" - that doesn't make it so. When he claims my GF >>>>>>>> is a man, calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of >>>>>>>> baloney, here, he's not granting her equality, he's denying her >>>>>>>> treatment as a dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
Joel admits to getting it up the ass and enjoying, but wonders why I >>>>>> would call him a faggot. You can't make this up.
You wonder why people would not want to have you call the derogatory names...
which is a weakness in you, not your targets.
He's proving why I'm the one winning the debate, is the irony, the
Usenet audience can be whatever he imagines it to be but the rational
people are going to see that I'm in the right.
Right. So many of the MAGA types see ""winning" as getting their own
irrational group celebrating. My goal -- and yours -- is to be accurate and >>> (mostly) kind. Completely different goals.
He needs my "admitting to getting it up the ass and enjoying" to have a
special, pejorative value. This is only in his own mind, however.
Psychology shows that I'm winning, because I'm not afraid of being
called a fag. I'm merely exposing what I like to do, publicly, and it
shocks him, because of his insecurity about homosexuality.
You are winning because you are not sinking to his level. You are showing you are secure in who you are, and you have no need to harm others.
He is losing... unhinged, seeking to cause harm, showing deep insecurities.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a072fca$3$13959 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:14 a.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:wigs
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their
straightor breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just
childrenYou are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said. >>>>>>>>>>> They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>>>> design.What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>>>women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration. >>>>>>>>>>>
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is >>>>>>>>>> becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is >>>>>>>> usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or >>>>>>>> behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
thoseordinary,into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but
areNobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftistswho do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses" >>>>>>>>
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchair
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
If you can provide evidence that transsexuals will be content with
wheelchair ramps, handicapped parking and wide bathroom stalls rather
than access to the same locker rooms as little girls and women and the
right to play sports against them despite being stronger and taller,
I'll gladly retract my statement.
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in news:yeHNR.82810$112.55088 @fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in
age-appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
Many of us grew up watching the
cross-dressing Bugs Bunny and Elmer
Fudd and Daffy Duck and still held
on to our hetero orientations.
Then we sat thru Tootie and Ms
Doubtfire and Ru Paul and Birdcage
and still didn't get "recruited into
the gay lifestyle"
Even the drag shows of JD Vance
and Rudy Guiliani didn't convert us.
So where does this "recruitment"When they demand that our kids attend reading where these demons get to
kick in?
On 5/15/26 12:22 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
The mixed gender one, duh.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>> design.
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their >>>>>>>>>>>>> wigs or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel? >>>>>>>>>>>>I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just
straight women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.
They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is
usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
children into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family isordinary,
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
areNobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but
those who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
leftists
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because
they are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while
demanding special treatment.
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchairAs a percentage how many trans people are there compared to disabled
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote <6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:Are you a bot?
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>> design.
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their >>>>>>>>>>>>> wigs or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel? >>>>>>>>>>>>I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just
straight women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.
They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is
usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
children into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
ordinary, everything else is societal waste.
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but
those who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
leftists are asking is for the groups above getting special
treatment because they are a minority. You can't scream "equality!"
all the while demanding special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special entitlements.
On 5/15/26 9:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:You are now endorsing child abuse.
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in age-
appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
I am done with you.--
You are toxic to society.
On 5/15/26 9:41 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:20 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 1:38 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 12:30 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 5:56 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 7:30 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 4:48 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:32 PM, zendejo wrote:Yes, so?
I read back through his poasts and they are all very trans focused. >>>>>>>>>
He even has a hot trans model he's infatuated with.
That lifestyle generally includes lots of anal sex.
I am in love with a trans woman, she is a top, and I am a bottom. >>>>>>>
It reflects her sane decision not to have her balls cut off and her >>>>>> dick sliced like a Five Guys hot dog, to be formed into something
resembling a vagina, as well as my liking dick up my ass.
Sounds like two gay guys doing non surgical dress up.
She isn't a guy.
"She" most certainly came out of the womb as one.
This would be why they say "assigned male at birth", at that stage of
development there's nothing to indicate they're transgender.
A state of surgical and hormonal drugs alteration from "as born".
Agreed.No.There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it'sYou're making up your own definitions again.
hetero sex that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be. >>>>>>>
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic
attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of the >>>>>>> opposite sex or gender."
She is a female with a male body, it's hetero.
She is a male with a synthetic hormone fueled pseudo-female body.
She hasn't taken the hormones. She's gorgeous while being basically
all natural.
Most men can't push out large breasts like that, implants then?
Yes, collagen. They look remarkably real, though.
But fake is fake.
Trans fake is still fake.
On 5/15/26 10:48 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 8:32:15rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a073c7f$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/15/26 7:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:You need to understand that true freedom includes the right for his
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists are >>>>>> asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they >>>>>> are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding >>>>>> special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special >>>>> entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is "special >>>> treatment" - that doesn't make it so. When he claims my GF is a man,
calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of baloney, here,
he's not granting her equality, he's denying her treatment as a
dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
views to publicly contradict your own.
People have the right to different opinions. They even have the right to be >> wrong -- to contradict evidence and reason and logic. They even have the right
to be against equal rights -- what they do not have the (moral) right to do is
to work to stop equal rights.
Subject change.
Pass on expansion troll module.--
Ta.
That he speaks with some passion on the matter is what has drawn your ire. >>>
Try not to have such a soft shell.
Life is a messy proposition even at the actual norms.
On May 15, 2026 at 2:04:40rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a078a68$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/15/26 10:48 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 8:32:15rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a073c7f$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/15/26 7:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:You need to understand that true freedom includes the right for his
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists are
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they >>>>>>> are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding >>>>>>> special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special >>>>>> entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is "special >>>>> treatment" - that doesn't make it so. When he claims my GF is a man, >>>>> calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of baloney, here, >>>>> he's not granting her equality, he's denying her treatment as a
dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
views to publicly contradict your own.
People have the right to different opinions. They even have the right to be >>> wrong -- to contradict evidence and reason and logic. They even have the right
to be against equal rights -- what they do not have the (moral) right to do is
to work to stop equal rights.
Subject change.
No thanks. I will stick to the topic... bigotry is wrong. I back equal rights and being accurate.
On 2026-05-15 2:22 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:completely
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a072fca$3$13959
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:14 a.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:wigs
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their
straightor breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said. >>>>>>>>>>>> They were not people with birth defects, they were1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>>>>> design.What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>>>>women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration. >>>>>>>>>>>>
isnormal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is >>>>>>>>>>> becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that
leftistschildrenusual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or >>>>>>>>> behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
thoseordinary,into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what thewho do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses" >>>>>>>>>
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
theyare
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because
demandingare a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while
thespecial treatment.
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchair
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
If you can provide evidence that transsexuals will be content with
wheelchair ramps, handicapped parking and wide bathroom stalls rather
than access to the same locker rooms as little girls and women and
right to play sports against them despite being stronger and taller,
I'll gladly retract my statement.
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far as
I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a073bc9$0$20
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:14 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:wigs
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their
straightor breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100% natural trans women.|e-a No breasts, no nothing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
children"TG identity" is far from "normal".You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said. >>>>>>>>>>>> They were not people with birth defects, they wereWhat?|e-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans >>>>>>>>>>>>>> women.women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or >>>>>>>>>>>>> by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration. >>>>>>>>>>>>
completely normal XY individuals with transgender identity. >>>>>>>>>>>
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is >>>>>>>>>>> becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/|i-an|a-|rm(|erao)l/Normal generally describes
something that is usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to >>>>>>>>> actions, states, or behaviors that conform to a standard,
pattern, or average." Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
ordinary,into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
Beef that out with the Pharisees and Rome.
Certainly it's not hard to say the lives of Christ and his disciples
were ill-valued by the religion (s) of the day.
Evasion noted.
Is the confirmed bachelor lifestyle
(like Jesus) a "societal waste" NOW?
According to you they don't put out enough babies to keep Social
Security afloat.
On Fri, 15 May 2026 13:14:00 +0000
Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their
wigs or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100%
natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just
straight women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
ng that is
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by
design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.
They were not people with birth defects, they were completely
normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes somethi
ordinary,usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
children into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
areNobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but
those who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
leftists
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because
they are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while
demanding special treatment.
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchair
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
As a percentage how many trans people are there compared to disabled
people?
On 2026-05-15 2:40 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:yeHNR.82810$112.55088 @fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story
hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in
age-appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
Many of us grew up watching the
cross-dressing Bugs Bunny and Elmer
Fudd and Daffy Duck and still held
on to our hetero orientations.
Cartoons. Neither Bugs Bunny nor Daffy Duck insisted on talking
directly to our kids and having them sit on their laps.
Then we sat thru Tootie and Ms
Doubtfire and Ru Paul and Birdcage
and still didn't get "recruited into
the gay lifestyle"
Fictional stories and characters played by actors who were clearly heterosexual for comedic purposes. Rupaul wasn't funny though. Rupaul
was a loser we all enjoyed laughing at.
Even the drag shows of JD Vance
and Rudy Guiliani didn't convert us.
Cite please.
So where does this "recruitment"When they demand that our kids attend reading where these demons get
kick in?
to speak to them directly, touch them and ask them to touch them back.
It is in these sessions that they also normalize homosexuality and
encourage children to question gender norms. These demons should all
be hanged, but because our society has strayed from God,
our people
cannot recognize them as the demons they are. You've lost discernment
in your pursuit to make yourself equals to God.
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n6p6rpFs55vU2@mid.individual.net:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a073bc9$0$20
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:14 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:wigs
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their
straightor breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100% natural trans women.|e-a No breasts, no nothing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
children"TG identity" is far from "normal".You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said. >>>>>>>>>>>>> They were not people with birth defects, they wereWhat?|e-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> women.women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
completely normal XY individuals with transgender identity. >>>>>>>>>>>>
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is >>>>>>>>>>>> becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/|i-an|a-|rm(|erao)l/Normal generally describes
something that is usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to >>>>>>>>>> actions, states, or behaviors that conform to a standard,
pattern, or average." Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
ordinary,into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
Beef that out with the Pharisees and Rome.
Certainly it's not hard to say the lives of Christ and his disciples
were ill-valued by the religion (s) of the day.
Evasion noted.
Is the confirmed bachelor lifestyle
(like Jesus) a "societal waste" NOW?
According to you they don't put out enough babies to keep Social
Security afloat.
Actually that is correct, America needs
more people. And given the current low birth
rate that means immigrants.
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/01/politics/undocumented-immigrants- social-security
On 15 May 2026 13:34:42 GMT
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wroteng that is
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their
wigs or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100%
natural trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just
straight women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by
design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.
They were not people with birth defects, they were completely
normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes somethi
usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
children into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
ordinary, everything else is societal waste.
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but
those who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
leftists are asking is for the groups above getting special
treatment because they are a minority. You can't scream "equality!"
all the while demanding special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special
entitlements.
Are you a bot?
The reason I ask is because you keep using the typical left wing bot
terms.
Special entitlements.
Herd mentality.
Tribalism.
And others.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a079a8f$0$55974 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 2:22 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:completely
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a072fca$3$13959
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:14 a.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:wigs
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their
straightor breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-A-a No breasts, no nothing, just
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said. >>>>>>>>>>>>> They were not people with birth defects, they were1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> design.What?-A-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
isnormal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is >>>>>>>>>>>> becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-cre4n-o-arm(-Orao)l/Normal generally describes something that
leftistschildrenusual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or >>>>>>>>>> behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average." >>>>>>>>>> Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
thoseordinary,into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what thewho do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender >>>>>>>>>> nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses" >>>>>>>>>>
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
theyare
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because
demandingare a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while
thespecial treatment.
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchair
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
If you can provide evidence that transsexuals will be content with
wheelchair ramps, handicapped parking and wide bathroom stalls rather
than access to the same locker rooms as little girls and women and
right to play sports against them despite being stronger and taller,
I'll gladly retract my statement.
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far as
I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
"God assigned" everyone to be female.
Including you.
On 5/15/2026 11:25 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis.
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's
hetero sex
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic
attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of the
opposite sex or gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one,
apparently.
Idiot.-a It's truth.-a You're too stupid to see that.
You have an obvious nested agenda.
The only agenda is to educate people about the validity of trans
identity.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a079b92$0$55974$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 2:40 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:yeHNR.82810$112.55088 @fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story
hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in
age-appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
Many of us grew up watching the
cross-dressing Bugs Bunny and Elmer
Fudd and Daffy Duck and still held
on to our hetero orientations.
Cartoons. Neither Bugs Bunny nor Daffy Duck insisted on talking
directly to our kids and having them sit on their laps.
Then we sat thru Tootie and Ms
Doubtfire and Ru Paul and Birdcage
and still didn't get "recruited into
the gay lifestyle"
Fictional stories and characters played by actors who were clearly
heterosexual for comedic purposes. Rupaul wasn't funny though. Rupaul
was a loser we all enjoyed laughing at.
Even the drag shows of JD Vance
and Rudy Guiliani didn't convert us.
Cite please.
So where does this "recruitment"When they demand that our kids attend reading where these demons get
kick in?
to speak to them directly, touch them and ask them to touch them back.
It is in these sessions that they also normalize homosexuality and
encourage children to question gender norms. These demons should all
be hanged, but because our society has strayed from God,
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
Jamie Kingmann <kingmannjjjj@entermail.com> wrote in news:20260515182751.620e3b99@weed:
On Fri, 15 May 2026 13:14:00 +0000
Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wigs or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> straight women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
ng that isYou are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said. >>>>>>>>>>> They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>>>> design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration. >>>>>>>>>>>
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is >>>>>>>>>> becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes somethi
ordinary,usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or >>>>>>>> behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
children into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
areNobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but >>>>>>>>> those who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses" >>>>>>>>
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
leftists
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because
they are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while
demanding special treatment.
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchair
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
As a percentage how many trans people are there compared to disabled
people?
Why would that matter?
Trans people aren't costing you any money,
they aren't demanding special facilities or
public spending. If someone changes their
hair color or gender or marital status or
name what does it matter to anyone else?
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in news:McHNR.82723$112.63390@fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:25 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis.
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's
hetero sex
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic
attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of the
opposite sex or gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one,
apparently.
Idiot.-a It's truth.-a You're too stupid to see that.
You have an obvious nested agenda.
The only agenda is to educate people about the validity of trans
identity.
Trans people exist.
Gay people exist.
Black people exist.
Native Americans exist.
Immigrant people exist.
What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 2:04:40rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a078a68$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/15/26 10:48 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 8:32:15rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a073c7f$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/15/26 7:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:You need to understand that true freedom includes the right for his
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47rC>AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists are
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they >>>>>>>> are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding >>>>>>>> special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special >>>>>>> entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is "special >>>>>> treatment" - that doesn't make it so. When he claims my GF is a man, >>>>>> calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of baloney, here, >>>>>> he's not granting her equality, he's denying her treatment as a
dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
views to publicly contradict your own.
People have the right to different opinions. They even have the right to be
wrong -- to contradict evidence and reason and logic. They even have the right
to be against equal rights -- what they do not have the (moral) right to do is
to work to stop equal rights.
Subject change.
No thanks. I will stick to the topic... bigotry is wrong. I back equal rights
and being accurate.
Do you agree that Joel is a bigot who is prejudiced against people with college and graduate degrees?
Isn't he promoting the Musk grifter idea
that people who drop out of high school can make it just as big as
everybody else? Isn't he saying that NASA needs more high school
dropouts in order to sabotage NASA?
On 2026-05-15 9:49 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
Jamie Kingmann <kingmannjjjj@entermail.com> wrote in
news:20260515182751.620e3b99@weed:
On Fri, 15 May 2026 13:14:00 +0000
Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18ng that is
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wigs or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> straight women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said. >>>>>>>>>>>> They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>>>>> design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration. >>>>>>>>>>>>
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is >>>>>>>>>>> becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes somethi
ordinary,usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or >>>>>>>>> behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
children into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
areNobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but >>>>>>>>>> those who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses" >>>>>>>>>
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
leftists
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because
they are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while
demanding special treatment.
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchair
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
As a percentage how many trans people are there compared to disabled
people?
Why would that matter?
Trans people aren't costing you any money,
they aren't demanding special facilities or
public spending. If someone changes their
hair color or gender or marital status or
name what does it matter to anyone else?
Lie. They are demanding that the state pay for their "transition,"
they
demand that we accept them in bathrooms
that is the opposite of the sex
they were born with and they demand that we affirm their delusion for
fear of legal repercussions.
The first and the last cost money, and the
second leads to long years of therapy for the vulnerable children
exposed to these dangerous idiots which also costs money.
Face it, you're a brainwashed twat.--
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in news:McHNR.82723$112.63390@fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:25 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis.
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's
hetero sex
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic
attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of the
opposite sex or gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one,
apparently.
Idiot.-a It's truth.-a You're too stupid to see that.
You have an obvious nested agenda.
The only agenda is to educate people about the validity of trans
identity.
Trans people exist.
Gay people exist.
Black people exist.
Native Americans exist.
Immigrant people exist.
What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
On May 15, 2026 at 4:26:23aPM MST, "phoenix" wrote <n6pod1Fbc2U1@mid.individual.net>:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 2:04:40aPM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a078a68$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/15/26 10:48 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 8:32:15aAM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a073c7f$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/15/26 7:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 9:34 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:You need to understand that true freedom includes the right for his >>>>> views to publicly contradict your own.
On May 15, 2026 at 5:38:47aAM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote
<6a0713d7$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists are
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding >>>>>>>> special treatment.
People want EQUAL rights. You want to deny them that. You want special
entitlements.
People like Crude claim that equal rights for unique groups is "special
treatment" - that doesn't make it so. When he claims my GF is a man, >>>>>> calls me "faggot", and such, it shows why he's full of baloney, here, >>>>>> he's not granting her equality, he's denying her treatment as a
dignified human being, he's full of hatred.
People have the right to different opinions. They even have the right to be
wrong -- to contradict evidence and reason and logic. They even have the right
to be against equal rights -- what they do not have the (moral) right to do is
to work to stop equal rights.
Subject change.
No thanks. I will stick to the topic... bigotry is wrong. I back equal rights
and being accurate.
Do you agree that Joel is a bigot who is prejudiced against people with college and graduate degrees?
I have heard him say things I disagree with -- strongly -- but I do not think I have seen that. But even if I did that is not as core as someone gender, sexuality, religion, color, etc.
Isn't he promoting the Musk grifter idea
that people who drop out of high school can make it just as big as everybody else? Isn't he saying that NASA needs more high school
dropouts in order to sabotage NASA?
I see nothing of the like above.
...
Trans people exist.
Gay people exist.
Black people exist.
Native Americans exist.
Immigrant people exist.
What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
Mitchell Holman wrote:
America needs
more people. And given the current low birth
rate that means immigrants.
She [Joel's trans GF] isn't a guy.
"She" most certainly came out of the womb as one.
This would be why they say "assigned male at birth", at that stage of
development there's nothing to indicate they're transgender.
A state of surgical and hormonal drugs alteration from "as born".
Agreed.She hasn't taken the hormones.-a She's gorgeous while being basically >>>> all natural.
Most men can't push out large breasts like that, implants then?
Yes, collagen.-a They look remarkably real, though.
But fake is fake.
Trans fake is still fake.
Marvelous, wishing you all the best, both of you guys.Honestly if you back track the postings there is credibility of the
principals, if it's an act, so be it.
I know it sounds weird for Usenet, people like me are supposed to be
younger Gen Z whatever people, but in fact there are people older than
I am who are coming out as trans.-a I liked what I saw with trans women
so I pursued meeting one.
He needs my "admitting to getting it up the ass and enjoying" to haveAttention whoring = trolling.
a special, pejorative value.-a This is only in his own mind, however.
Psychology shows that I'm winning, because I'm not afraid of being
called a fag.-a I'm merely exposing what I like to do, publicly, and it
shocks him, because of his insecurity about homosexuality.
On 2026-05-15 9:38 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a079a8f$0$55974
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 2:22 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:completely
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a072fca$3$13959
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:14 a.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:wigs
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
straightor breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100% natural trans women.-A-a No breasts, no nothing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> said. They were not people with birth defects, they werewomen with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unicorns.
What?-A-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
isnormal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it >>>>>>>>>>>>> is becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-cre4n-o-arm(-Orao)l/Normal generally describes
something that
leftistschildrenusual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, >>>>>>>>>>> or behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or
average." Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
thoseordinary,into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
- trans identity isn't something most people experience, >>>>>>>>>>>> but
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what thewho do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender >>>>>>>>>>> nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime
offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
theyare
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because
demandingare a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while
thespecial treatment.
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchair
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
If you can provide evidence that transsexuals will be content with
wheelchair ramps, handicapped parking and wide bathroom stalls
rather than access to the same locker rooms as little girls and
women and
right to play sports against them despite being stronger and
taller, I'll gladly retract my statement.
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far
as I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
"God assigned" everyone to be female.
Including you.
Explain Adam.
Mitchell Holman wrote:
America needs
more people. And given the current low birth
rate that means immigrants.
Fine, vet them and allow the best of them in. Don't just throw-open
the door and allow the dregs of the Earth (Muslims) to saunter in.
Has this never occurred to you? Is it not the *obvious* answer to the problem?
On 2026-05-15 9:58 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a079b92$0$55974$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 2:40 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:yeHNR.82810$112.55088 @fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story
hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in
age-appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
Many of us grew up watching the
cross-dressing Bugs Bunny and Elmer
Fudd and Daffy Duck and still held
on to our hetero orientations.
Cartoons. Neither Bugs Bunny nor Daffy Duck insisted on talking
directly to our kids and having them sit on their laps.
Then we sat thru Tootie and Ms
Doubtfire and Ru Paul and Birdcage
and still didn't get "recruited into
the gay lifestyle"
Fictional stories and characters played by actors who were clearly
heterosexual for comedic purposes. Rupaul wasn't funny though.
Rupaul was a loser we all enjoyed laughing at.
Even the drag shows of JD Vance
and Rudy Guiliani didn't convert us.
Cite please.
So where does this "recruitment"When they demand that our kids attend reading where these demons get
kick in?
to speak to them directly, touch them and ask them to touch them
back. It is in these sessions that they also normalize homosexuality
and encourage children to question gender norms. These demons should
all be hanged, but because our society has strayed from God,
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
Corinthians 6:19: "Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the
Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are
not your own; you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with
your bodies."
On 2026-05-15 10:12 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:McHNR.82723$112.63390@fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:25 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis.
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's
hetero sex
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic
attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of the >>>>>>> opposite sex or gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one,
apparently.
Idiot.-a It's truth.-a You're too stupid to see that.
You have an obvious nested agenda.
The only agenda is to educate people about the validity of trans
identity.
Trans people exist.
Gay people exist.
Black people exist.
Native Americans exist.
Immigrant people exist.
What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
The harm is in the fact that you brainwashed twat don't teach that they exist; you teach that they need to be positioned above legal citizens, especially white heterosexuals, merely because they are transsexual
demons, homosexual demons, niggers, savages or illegals.
Mitchell Holman wrote:
Trans people exist.
You mean mentally-ill and/or sexually perverted people?
Gay people exist.
Black people exist.
Native Americans exist.
Immigrant people exist.
What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
No one denies that they exist.
What is the harm in being honest?
On May 15, 2026 at 7:12:11aPM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote <6a07d27b$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 2026-05-15 9:49 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
Jamie Kingmann <kingmannjjjj@entermail.com> wrote in
news:20260515182751.620e3b99@weed:
On Fri, 15 May 2026 13:14:00 +0000
Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18ng that is
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400What? They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wigs or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> straight women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said. >>>>>>>>>>>> They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>>>>> design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration. >>>>>>>>>>>>
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is >>>>>>>>>>> becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/'nrrm(?)l/Normal generally describes somethi
ordinary,usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or >>>>>>>>> behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average." >>>>>>>>> Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
children into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
areNobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but >>>>>>>>>> those who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender >>>>>>>>> nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses" >>>>>>>>>
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
leftists
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because
they are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while
demanding special treatment.
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchair
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
As a percentage how many trans people are there compared to disabled
people?
Why would that matter?
Trans people aren't costing you any money,
they aren't demanding special facilities or
public spending. If someone changes their
hair color or gender or marital status or
name what does it matter to anyone else?
Lie. They are demanding that the state pay for their "transition,"
Everyone gets some level of medical care.
they
demand that we accept them in bathrooms
Everyone goes to the bathroom.
that is the opposite of the sex
they were born with and they demand that we affirm their delusion for
fear of legal repercussions.
You are the one demanding people reject evidence and science. THAT is a special entitlement.
The first and the last cost money, and the
second leads to long years of therapy for the vulnerable children
exposed to these dangerous idiots which also costs money.
You are the one demanding they do not get medical care. That is a YOU issue.
Face it, you're a brainwashed twat.
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in news:oieg0lh05og5aol7cbj0o8fidk2m18i0bj@4ax.com:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
Trans people exist.
You mean mentally-ill and/or sexually perverted people?
Is everyone different from you mentally ill?
Gay people exist.
Black people exist.
Native Americans exist.
Immigrant people exist.
What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
No one denies that they exist.
What is the harm in being honest?
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in news:2reg0lts1nufjserela927bf3g3lqmdegl@4ax.com:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
America needs
more people. And given the current low birth
rate that means immigrants.
Fine, vet them and allow the best of them in. Don't just throw-open
the door and allow the dregs of the Earth (Muslims) to saunter in.
Has this never occurred to you? Is it not the *obvious* answer to the problem?
If American workers are so plentiful why
does Trump himself depend on immigrants?
Trump businesses seek to hire more foreign
workers as his administration supercharges
deportations
August 7, 2025
https://tinyurl.com/3cch6hu7
On 5/15/2026 5:01 PM, zendejo wrote:
She [Joel's trans GF] isn't a guy.
"She" most certainly came out of the womb as one.
This would be why they say "assigned male at birth", at that stage of
development there's nothing to indicate they're transgender.
A state of surgical and hormonal drugs alteration from "as born".
She was born trans, but no one can tell that about an infant. She knew
she was as a young child.
Agreed.She hasn't taken the hormones.a She's gorgeous while being basically >>>> all natural.
Most men can't push out large breasts like that, implants then?
Yes, collagen.a They look remarkably real, though.
But fake is fake.
Trans fake is still fake.
Her breasts are fake, her gender identity isn't fake.
On 5/15/2026 5:01 PM, zendejo wrote:
Marvelous, wishing you all the best, both of you guys.Honestly if you back track the postings there is credibility of the
principals, if it's an act, so be it.
I know it sounds weird for Usenet, people like me are supposed to be
younger Gen Z whatever people, but in fact there are people older than
I am who are coming out as trans.a I liked what I saw with trans women
so I pursued meeting one.
Thank you.
On 5/15/2026 5:06 PM, zendejo wrote:
He needs my "admitting to getting it up the ass and enjoying" to haveAttention whoring = trolling.
a special, pejorative value.a This is only in his own mind, however.
Psychology shows that I'm winning, because I'm not afraid of being
called a fag.a I'm merely exposing what I like to do, publicly, and it
shocks him, because of his insecurity about homosexuality.
It's only "attention whoring" if I'm supposed to keep it a secret, for
some arbitrary reason - so that is discrimination. If I were talking
about eating pussy, no one would give me this shit, but that's just as
much exposing my sex life.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a07d1b1$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:38 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a079a8f$0$55974
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 2:22 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:completely
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a072fca$3$13959
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:14 a.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:wigs
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
straightor breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100% natural trans women.-?-a No breasts, no nothing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> said. They were not people with birth defects, they werewomen with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unicorns.
What?-?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
isnormal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it >>>>>>>>>>>>> is becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-?r?4n-?-?rm(-?r?o)l/Normal generally describes >>>>>>>>>>> something that
leftistschildrenusual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, >>>>>>>>>>> or behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or
average." Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
thoseordinary,into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
- trans identity isn't something most people experience, >>>>>>>>>>>> but
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what thewho do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender >>>>>>>>>>> nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime
offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
theyare
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because
demandingare a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while
thespecial treatment.
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchair
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
If you can provide evidence that transsexuals will be content with >>>>> wheelchair ramps, handicapped parking and wide bathroom stalls
rather than access to the same locker rooms as little girls and
women and
right to play sports against them despite being stronger and
taller, I'll gladly retract my statement.
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far
as I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
"God assigned" everyone to be female.
Including you.
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales to anyone. I leave that to those
who still believe in them.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a07d37e$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:58 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a079b92$0$55974$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 2:40 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:yeHNR.82810$112.55088 @fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story
hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in
age-appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
Many of us grew up watching the
cross-dressing Bugs Bunny and Elmer
Fudd and Daffy Duck and still held
on to our hetero orientations.
Cartoons. Neither Bugs Bunny nor Daffy Duck insisted on talking
directly to our kids and having them sit on their laps.
Then we sat thru Tootie and Ms
Doubtfire and Ru Paul and Birdcage
and still didn't get "recruited into
the gay lifestyle"
Fictional stories and characters played by actors who were clearly
heterosexual for comedic purposes. Rupaul wasn't funny though.
Rupaul was a loser we all enjoyed laughing at.
Even the drag shows of JD Vance
and Rudy Guiliani didn't convert us.
Cite please.
So where does this "recruitment"When they demand that our kids attend reading where these demons get
kick in?
to speak to them directly, touch them and ask them to touch them
back. It is in these sessions that they also normalize homosexuality
and encourage children to question gender norms. These demons should
all be hanged, but because our society has strayed from God,
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
Corinthians 6:19: "Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the
Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are
not your own; you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with
your bodies."
So we should all just accept our bodies as is?
No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
"Your birth defect is God's design, live with it"
Gads.
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs or
breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% natural
trans women. No breasts, no nothing, just straight women with cocks
and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a07d40c$0$26 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 10:12 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:McHNR.82723$112.63390@fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:25 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis.
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's >>>>>>>> hetero sex
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic
attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of the >>>>>>> opposite sex or gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one,
apparently.
Idiot.-a It's truth.-a You're too stupid to see that.
You have an obvious nested agenda.
The only agenda is to educate people about the validity of trans
identity.
Trans people exist.
Gay people exist.
Black people exist.
Native Americans exist.
Immigrant people exist.
What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
The harm is in the fact that you brainwashed twat don't teach that they exist; you teach that they need to be positioned above legal citizens, especially white heterosexuals, merely because they are transsexual demons, homosexual demons, niggers, savages or illegals.
Easy to see why this dreck is being posted anonymously......
But aren't you an actual sodomite?
As opposed to a commentator.
You're the one demonstrating said.
Sodomize or be sodomized as you please, matters not to me.
Special entitlements.
Herd mentality.
Tribalism.
And others.
So are you a bot or just another poorly informed liberal?
To be sodomized is to be the recipient or passive partner in anal or
oral sex. The term is the past tense form of the verb sodomize, which is
the act of performing sodomy on someone.
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far as
I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
-a-a So where does this "recruitment"
kick in?
When they demand that our kids attend reading where these demons get to speak to them directly, touch them and ask them to touch them back. It
is in these sessions that they also normalize homosexuality and
encourage children to question gender norms. These demons should all be hanged, but because our society has strayed from God, our people cannot recognize them as the demons they are. You've lost discernment in your pursuit to make yourself equals to God.
On 2026-05-15 5:06 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 12:22 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
The mixed gender one, duh.
Oh, I like your answer much better than mine. Allowing them to go in
either the male or female washroom would make them hypocrites.
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchairAs a percentage how many trans people are there compared to disabled
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
people?
On May 15, 2026 at 2:03:16rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a078a14$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/15/26 9:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:You are now endorsing child abuse.
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in age-
appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
Cite.
I am done with you.
You are toxic to society.
On 5/15/26 4:27 PM, Jamie Kingmann wrote:
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchairAs a percentage how many trans people are there compared to disabled
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
people?
Great question.
"Approximately 1% of the U.S. population (aged 13 and older) identifies
as transgender.
The CDC reports that 28.7% (nearly 1 in 4) of U.S. adults have a disability.
The U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey cites 13.6% of the
general population."
Looks like the 1%rs are demanding more than their fair share.
On May 15, 2026 at 2:01:09rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a078995$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/15/26 9:41 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:20 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 1:38 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 12:30 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 5:56 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 7:30 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 4:48 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:32 PM, zendejo wrote:Yes, so?
I read back through his poasts and they are all very trans focused. >>>>>>>>>>
He even has a hot trans model he's infatuated with.
That lifestyle generally includes lots of anal sex.
I am in love with a trans woman, she is a top, and I am a bottom. >>>>>>>>
It reflects her sane decision not to have her balls cut off and her >>>>>>> dick sliced like a Five Guys hot dog, to be formed into something >>>>>>> resembling a vagina, as well as my liking dick up my ass.
Sounds like two gay guys doing non surgical dress up.
She isn't a guy.
"She" most certainly came out of the womb as one.
This would be why they say "assigned male at birth", at that stage of
development there's nothing to indicate they're transgender.
A state of surgical and hormonal drugs alteration from "as born".
Agreed.No.There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's >>>>>>>>> hetero sex that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be. >>>>>>>>You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic
attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of the >>>>>>>> opposite sex or gender."
She is a female with a male body, it's hetero.
She is a male with a synthetic hormone fueled pseudo-female body.
She hasn't taken the hormones. She's gorgeous while being basically >>>>> all natural.
Most men can't push out large breasts like that, implants then?
Yes, collagen. They look remarkably real, though.
But fake is fake.
Trans fake is still fake.
What is "trans fake"?
Subject change.No thanks. I will stick to the topic... bigotry is wrong.
"God assigned" everyone to be female.
Including you.
We Were Once All Female
14 June 2015
It may come as a surprise to some of
our male readers, but you all actually
started out as females - physically and
phenotypically speaking.
America needs
more people. And given the current low birth
rate that means immigrants.
As a percentage how many trans people are there compared to disabledWhy would that matter?
people?
Trans people aren't costing you any money,
they aren't demanding special facilities or
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
On 5/15/26 5:08 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 2:03:16rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a078a14$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/15/26 9:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:You are now endorsing child abuse.
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in age- >>>> appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
Cite.
Do your own homework in future, troll.
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
Special entitlements.
Herd mentality.
Tribalism.
And others.
Those are right wing bot terms.
-a-a-a-a "God assigned" everyone to be female.
-a-a-a-a Including you.
Explain Adam.
--
Trans people exist.
Gay people exist.
Black people exist.
Native Americans exist.
Immigrant people exist.
What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
Lie. They are demanding that the state pay for their "transition,"Everyone gets some level of medical care.
What is the harm in teachingNo one denies that they exist.
that other people exist?
What is the harm in being honest?
On 5/15/2026 5:01 PM, zendejo wrote:
She [Joel's trans GF] isn't a guy.
"She" most certainly came out of the womb as one.
This would be why they say "assigned male at birth", at that stage of
development there's nothing to indicate they're transgender.
A state of surgical and hormonal drugs alteration from "as born".
She was born trans,
but no one can tell that about an infant.-a She knew
she was as a young child.
Agreed.She hasn't taken the hormones.-a She's gorgeous while being
basically all natural.
Most men can't push out large breasts like that, implants then?
Yes, collagen.-a They look remarkably real, though.
But fake is fake.
Trans fake is still fake.
Her breasts are fake, her gender identity isn't fake.
On 5/15/2026 5:01 PM, zendejo wrote:
Marvelous, wishing you all the best, both of you guys.Honestly if you back track the postings there is credibility of the
principals, if it's an act, so be it.
I know it sounds weird for Usenet, people like me are supposed to be
younger Gen Z whatever people, but in fact there are people older
than I am who are coming out as trans.-a I liked what I saw with trans
women so I pursued meeting one.
Thank you.
On 5/15/2026 5:06 PM, zendejo wrote:
He needs my "admitting to getting it up the ass and enjoying" to haveAttention whoring = trolling.
a special, pejorative value.-a This is only in his own mind, however.
Psychology shows that I'm winning, because I'm not afraid of being
called a fag.-a I'm merely exposing what I like to do, publicly, and
it shocks him, because of his insecurity about homosexuality.
It's only "attention whoring" if I'm supposed to keep it a secret, for
some arbitrary reason - so that is discrimination.
If I were talking
about eating pussy, no one would give me this shit, but that's just as
much exposing my sex life.
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
On 5/16/26 6:40 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 5:01 PM, zendejo wrote:Just stay away from children.
Marvelous, wishing you all the best, both of you guys.Honestly if you back track the postings there is credibility of the >>>>> principals, if it's an act, so be it.
I know it sounds weird for Usenet, people like me are supposed to be
younger Gen Z whatever people, but in fact there are people older
than I am who are coming out as trans.| I liked what I saw with trans >>>> women so I pursued meeting one.
Thank you.
If American workers are so plentiful why
does Trump himself depend on immigrants?
On 5/15/26 9:00 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Lie. They are demanding that the state pay for their "transition,"Everyone gets some level of medical care.
Gender mutilation
on demand is not "medical care".--
It is a state-sponsored elective abomination.
You reek of evil.
On 5/16/26 3:38 AM, chrisv wrote:
What is the harm in teachingNo one denies that they exist.
that other people exist?
What is the harm in being honest?
Stealing a child's innocence
On 5/15/26 8:12 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Trans people exist.
Gay people exist.
Black people exist.
Native Americans exist.
Immigrant people exist.
What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
Stealing a child's innocence
from them to groom them into deviant--
lifestyles:
"And finally, their intention to replace and redefine the nature of
family and kinship is also crystal clear. DQSH literally advertises
itself as rCLfamily friendlyrCY fun and that is how it slips in among unsuspecting librarians and teachers. These people readily admit they
have a very different meaning of the word rCLfamily.rCY
Here, DQSH is rCLfamily friendlyrCY in the sense of rCLfamilyrCY as an old-school queer code to identify and connect with other queers on the street.
It may be that DQSH is rCLfamily friendly,rCY in the sense that it is accessible and inviting to families with children, but it is less a sanitizing force than it is a preparatory introduction to alternate
modes of kinship.
[W]e suggest that DQSH offers a queer relationality with children that
breaks from the reproductive futurity of the normative classroom and
nuclear family.
Many performers study their craft in an adoptive drag family, wherein
drag mothers (or fathers, sisters, aunties) guide their children in
anything from how to glue down onerCOs eyebrows to delivering a flawless lip-synch.
These authors end their article with this revolutionary view toward the future, and they do so very much with your child in mind.
As we write this article, DQSH continues to draw public enthusiasm and
is set to expand. Of course, we are excited about that. Yet, we also
wonder how DQSH can continue to exist rCa engaging with the power of young childrenrCOs imaginations today to begin to envision alternate tomorrows. Playing with drag can be a way to remember that rCa rCLWerCOre already here, moving.rCY WerCOre dressing up, werCOre shaking our hips, and werCOre finding our light rCo even in the fluorescents. WerCOre reading books while we read each otherrCOs looks, and werCOre leaving a trail of glitter that wonrCOt ever
come out of the carpet.
Yes, this is grooming. Pseudo-academic jargon does not change the
authorsrCO evil intentions to corrupt and sexualize children.
It is a concerted effort to come after your children and grandchildren
so they participate in and adopt sexual and gender radicalness."
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a07d37e$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:58 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a079b92$0$55974$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 2:40 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:yeHNR.82810$112.55088 @fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story
hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in
age-appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
Many of us grew up watching the
cross-dressing Bugs Bunny and Elmer
Fudd and Daffy Duck and still held
on to our hetero orientations.
Cartoons. Neither Bugs Bunny nor Daffy Duck insisted on talking
directly to our kids and having them sit on their laps.
Then we sat thru Tootie and Ms
Doubtfire and Ru Paul and Birdcage
and still didn't get "recruited into
the gay lifestyle"
Fictional stories and characters played by actors who were clearly
heterosexual for comedic purposes. Rupaul wasn't funny though.
Rupaul was a loser we all enjoyed laughing at.
Even the drag shows of JD Vance
and Rudy Guiliani didn't convert us.
Cite please.
So where does this "recruitment"When they demand that our kids attend reading where these demons get
kick in?
to speak to them directly, touch them and ask them to touch them
back. It is in these sessions that they also normalize homosexuality
and encourage children to question gender norms. These demons should
all be hanged, but because our society has strayed from God,
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
Corinthians 6:19: "Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the
Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are
not your own; you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with
your bodies."
So we should all just accept our bodies as is?
No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
"Your birth defect is God's design, live with it"
Gads.
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of your ways.
On 5/16/26 6:43 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:manufacture.
On 5/15/2026 5:06 PM, zendejo wrote:
He needs my "admitting to getting it up the ass and enjoying" to have >>>> a special, pejorative value.-a This is only in his own mind, however. >>>> Psychology shows that I'm winning, because I'm not afraid of beingAttention whoring = trolling.
called a fag.-a I'm merely exposing what I like to do, publicly, and
it shocks him, because of his insecurity about homosexuality.
It's only "attention whoring" if I'm supposed to keep it a secret, for
some arbitrary reason - so that is discrimination.
No that is a classic straw man argument of your own design and
If I were talkingNon sequitur.
about eating pussy, no one would give me this shit, but that's just as
much exposing my sex life.
You've already lavished us with your anal proclivities, and needlessly
so save for garnering commentary here.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a07d40c$0$26 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 10:12 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:McHNR.82723$112.63390@fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:25 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis.
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's >>>>>>>>> hetero sex
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic
attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of the >>>>>>>> opposite sex or gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one,
apparently.
Idiot.-a It's truth.-a You're too stupid to see that.
You have an obvious nested agenda.
The only agenda is to educate people about the validity of trans
identity.
Trans people exist.
Gay people exist.
Black people exist.
Native Americans exist.
Immigrant people exist.
What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
The harm is in the fact that you brainwashed twat don't teach that they
exist; you teach that they need to be positioned above legal citizens,
especially white heterosexuals, merely because they are transsexual
demons, homosexual demons, niggers, savages or illegals.
Easy to see why this dreck is being posted anonymously......
Trans people exist.You mean mentally-ill and/or sexually perverted people?
Is everyone different from you mentally ill?
The author casually redefines "grooming" (which has an actual, serious >clinical definition involving abuse) to mean "literally anything >LGBT-friendly." Then they take some dense, overly enthusiastic academic >jargon and treat it like a villainous blueprint for a crime.
In article <rBZNR.2735$6M1.1535@fx23.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 5/15/2026 5:01 PM, zendejo wrote:
Marvelous, wishing you all the best, both of you guys.Honestly if you back track the postings there is credibility of the
principals, if it's an act, so be it.
I know it sounds weird for Usenet, people like me are supposed to be
younger Gen Z whatever people, but in fact there are people older than >>>> I am who are coming out as trans.-a I liked what I saw with trans women >>>> so I pursued meeting one.
Thank you.
So both of you are guys. You admitted it.
In article <XnsB44E531C0DB47629555@185.151.15.190>,
noemail@aol.com says...
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a07d1b1$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:38 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a079a8f$0$55974
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 2:22 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:completely
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a072fca$3$13959
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:14 a.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:wigs
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0713d7$0$18
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
straightor breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100% natural trans women.|E?|e-a No breasts, no nothing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said. They were not people with birth defects, they werewomen with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unicorns.
What?|E?|e-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
isnormal XY individuals with transgender identity. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/|E?|o?-4n|E?|A?rm(|E?|o?-o)l/Normal generally describes >>>>>>>>>>>>> something that
leftistschildrenusual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, >>>>>>>>>>>>> or behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or >>>>>>>>>>>>> average." Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing
thoseinto alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is >>>>>>>> ordinary,
everything else is societal waste.
"Societal waste" - like Jesus?
- trans identity isn't something most people experience, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what thewho do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender >>>>>>>>>>>>> nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime >>>>>>>>>>>>> offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
theyare
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because
demandingare a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while
thespecial treatment.
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchair
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
If you can provide evidence that transsexuals will be content with >>>>>>> wheelchair ramps, handicapped parking and wide bathroom stalls
rather than access to the same locker rooms as little girls and
women and
right to play sports against them despite being stronger and
taller, I'll gladly retract my statement.
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far >>>>> as I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
"God assigned" everyone to be female.
Including you.
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales to anyone. I leave that to those
who still believe in them.
Says the kook who refers to the bible all the time.
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far as
I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom they >stridently despise and disobey.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:25:48rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a08a89d$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/15/26 5:08 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 15, 2026 at 2:03:16rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a078a14$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/15/26 9:47 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:You are now endorsing child abuse.
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story hours. >>>>>
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in age- >>>>> appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
Cite.
Do your own homework in future, troll.
You are not familiar with burden of proof. Interesting.
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
Obviously extremely biased source:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:38:50rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a08abab$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/15/26 9:00 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Lie. They are demanding that the state pay for their "transition,"Everyone gets some level of medical care.
Gender mutilation
Incorrect starting premise. GIGO.
Let us let medical professionals decide what is medical care, not you.
on demand is not "medical care".
It is a state-sponsored elective abomination.
You reek of evil.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:39:40rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a08abdc$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
On 5/16/26 3:38 AM, chrisv wrote:
What is the harm in teachingNo one denies that they exist.
that other people exist?
What is the harm in being honest?
Stealing a child's innocence
False starting premise.
Again:
Stealing a child's innocenceFalse starting premise.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not count?
On 5/16/26 11:48 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Stealing a child's innocenceFalse starting premise.
You LIE again.
This is grooming, straight up.
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
chrisv wrote:
You mean mentally-ill and/or sexually perverted people?
Is everyone different from you mentally ill?
No one denies that they exist.
What is the harm in being honest?
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:48 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Stealing a child's innocenceFalse starting premise.
You LIE again.
This is grooming, straight up.
ThatrCOs what yourCOre trying to prove but
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:Does nothing to alter their normal sexual development, you admit this.
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead
On 5/16/26 7:20 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
If American workers are so plentiful why
does Trump himself depend on immigrants?
"Several weeks later, the Labor Department posted an order for 12 more foreign seasonal workers to work as servers at the same club."
Omg, so every "seasonal worker" is an illegal immigrant in your stunted mind?
some thing wrote:
Lie. They are demanding that the state pay for their "transition,"
Everyone gets some level of medical care.
Gender mutilation on demand is not "medical care".
On 5/16/26 7:27 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:get
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a07d37e$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:58 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a079b92$0$55974$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 2:40 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:yeHNR.82810$112.55088 @fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story
hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in >>>>>>> age-appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
Many of us grew up watching the
cross-dressing Bugs Bunny and Elmer
Fudd and Daffy Duck and still held
on to our hetero orientations.
Cartoons. Neither Bugs Bunny nor Daffy Duck insisted on talking
directly to our kids and having them sit on their laps.
Then we sat thru Tootie and Ms
Doubtfire and Ru Paul and Birdcage
and still didn't get "recruited into
the gay lifestyle"
Fictional stories and characters played by actors who were clearly
heterosexual for comedic purposes. Rupaul wasn't funny though.
Rupaul was a loser we all enjoyed laughing at.
Even the drag shows of JD Vance
and Rudy Guiliani didn't convert us.
Cite please.
So where does this "recruitment"When they demand that our kids attend reading where these demons
kick in?
homosexualityto speak to them directly, touch them and ask them to touch them
back. It is in these sessions that they also normalize
shouldand encourage children to question gender norms. These demons
theall be hanged, but because our society has strayed from God,
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
Corinthians 6:19: "Do you not know that your bodies are temples of
Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are
not your own; you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with
your bodies."
So we should all just accept our bodies as is?
No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
"Your birth defect is God's design, live with it"
Gads.
You conflate basic good container grooming with abridging God's design?
On 5/16/26 12:09 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:48 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Stealing a child's innocenceFalse starting premise.
You LIE again.
This is grooming, straight up.
ThatrCOs what yourCOre trying to prove but
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
This is grooming, straight up.
chrisv wrote:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
America needs
more people. And given the current low birth
rate that means immigrants.
Fine, vet them and allow the best of them in. Don't just throw-open
the door and allow the dregs of the Earth (Muslims) to saunter in.
Has this never occurred to you? Is it not the *obvious* answer to the
problem?
If American workers are so plentiful why
does Trump himself depend on immigrants?
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08ae2a$0$25 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:27 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:get
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a07d37e$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:58 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a079b92$0$55974$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 2:40 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:yeHNR.82810$112.55088 @fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story >>>>>>>>> hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in >>>>>>>> age-appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
Many of us grew up watching the
cross-dressing Bugs Bunny and Elmer
Fudd and Daffy Duck and still held
on to our hetero orientations.
Cartoons. Neither Bugs Bunny nor Daffy Duck insisted on talking
directly to our kids and having them sit on their laps.
Then we sat thru Tootie and Ms
Doubtfire and Ru Paul and Birdcage
and still didn't get "recruited into
the gay lifestyle"
Fictional stories and characters played by actors who were clearly >>>>>> heterosexual for comedic purposes. Rupaul wasn't funny though.
Rupaul was a loser we all enjoyed laughing at.
Even the drag shows of JD Vance
and Rudy Guiliani didn't convert us.
Cite please.
So where does this "recruitment"When they demand that our kids attend reading where these demons
kick in?
homosexualityto speak to them directly, touch them and ask them to touch them
back. It is in these sessions that they also normalize
shouldand encourage children to question gender norms. These demons
theall be hanged, but because our society has strayed from God,
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
Corinthians 6:19: "Do you not know that your bodies are temples of
Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are
not your own; you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with
your bodies."
So we should all just accept our bodies as is?
No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
"Your birth defect is God's design, live with it"
Gads.
You conflate basic good container grooming with abridging God's design?
Cleft palates are "God's design"
Crooked teeth are "God's design"?
Dwarfism is "God's design"?
Spina Bifida is "God's design"?
Sounds like your god should have stayed
in design class until the end of the semester.
On 5/16/26 7:28 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a07d40c$0$26CHILD GROOMING IS WRONG.
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 10:12 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:McHNR.82723$112.63390@fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:25 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis.
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's >>>>>>>>>> hetero sex
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic
attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of >>>>>>>>> the opposite sex or gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one,
apparently.
Idiot.-a It's truth.-a You're too stupid to see that.
You have an obvious nested agenda.
The only agenda is to educate people about the validity of trans
identity.
Trans people exist.
Gay people exist.
Black people exist.
Native Americans exist.
Immigrant people exist.
What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
The harm is in the fact that you brainwashed twat don't teach that
they exist; you teach that they need to be positioned above legal
citizens, especially white heterosexuals, merely because they are
transsexual demons, homosexual demons, niggers, savages or illegals.
Easy to see why this dreck is being posted anonymously......
Destroying ChildrenrCOs Natural Inhibitions and Norms
And they are not shy about their desire to aggressively attack and
break down natural and humanly universal sex-based inhibitions in your
very young boys and girls.
For example, Lil Miss Hot MessrCOs (2020) picture book The Hips on the
Drag Queen Go Swish, Swish, Swish encourages kids to move their hips
in ways often coded as effeminate. This not only breaks the taboo of
acting effeminate or identifying with queer figures, but also opens
space for children to study drag as a source of creative inspiration. Rebellion against norms is also paramount to their mission.
DQSH performers demonstrate a refusal to be told what to do.
DQSH is organized differently than the usual classroom experience. The
art of drag is defiant, playful, unruly.
Drag may offer insights into how educators might support a practice of strategic defiance.
DQSH presents a queer relationship to educational experience. The traditional role of the teacher, transformed in a loud and sparkling
queen, becomes delightfully excessive. She is less interested in
focus, discipline, achievement, or objectives than playful
self-expression. Her pedagogy is rooted in pleasure and creativity
borne, in part, from letting go of control.
Instead, drag is firmly rooted in play as a site of queer pleasure, resistance, and self-fashioning.
In a broader context, fostering collective unruliness also helps
children to understand that they can have a hand in changing their environment rCa drag may help elucidate the arbitrariness of rules.
In many cases, drag queens may not respond with answers [to questions
like rCLAre you a boy or a girl?rCY], but with questions meant to
complicate perceptions of gender and society.
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits- to-grooming-your-kids/
On 5/16/26 7:30 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Trans people exist.You mean mentally-ill and/or sexually perverted people?
Is everyone different from you mentally ill?
Is witless absolutism the back 40 of your perceptual graveyard?
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far as
I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom they stridently despise and disobey.
On 5/15/26 4:27 PM, Jamie Kingmann wrote:
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchairAs a percentage how many trans people are there compared to disabled
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
people?
Great question.
"Approximately 1% of the U.S. population (aged 13 and older)
identifies as transgender.
The CDC reports that 28.7% (nearly 1 in 4) of U.S. adults have a
disability.
The U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey cites 13.6% of the general population."
Looks like the 1%rs are demanding more than their fair share.
On 5/15/26 7:42 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
America needs
more people. And given the current low birth
rate that means immigrants.
Democrats need:
@ wage slaves for manual labor
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08ae5e$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:28 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a07d40c$0$26CHILD GROOMING IS WRONG.
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 10:12 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:McHNR.82723$112.63390@fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:25 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis.
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's >>>>>>>>>>> hetero sex
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic >>>>>>>>>> attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of >>>>>>>>>> the opposite sex or gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one,
apparently.
Idiot.|e-a It's truth.|e-a You're too stupid to see that.
You have an obvious nested agenda.
The only agenda is to educate people about the validity of trans
identity.
Trans people exist.
Gay people exist.
Black people exist.
Native Americans exist.
Immigrant people exist.
What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
The harm is in the fact that you brainwashed twat don't teach that
they exist; you teach that they need to be positioned above legal
citizens, especially white heterosexuals, merely because they are
transsexual demons, homosexual demons, niggers, savages or illegals.
Easy to see why this dreck is being posted anonymously......
What was Trump doing on Epstein Island?
Destroying Children|ore4raos Natural Inhibitions and Norms
All religions seek to destroy natural
inhibitions (and common sense) and replace
them with dogma.
And they are not shy about their desire to aggressively attack and
break down natural and humanly universal sex-based inhibitions in your
very young boys and girls.
Catholic priests (and even nuns) have a
huge head start on that. When can we see a
rightwing vendetta against them?
On 5/15/26 7:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
AI Overview
The Bible addresses sexual deviance through the umbrella term "sexual immorality" (translated from the Greek word porneia). This encompasses
all sexual acts outside of God's design for monogamous,
On 5/16/26 11:48 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Stealing a child's innocenceFalse starting premise.
You LIE again.
This is grooming, straight up.
On 5/16/26 12:09 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:48 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Stealing a child's innocenceFalse starting premise.
You LIE again.
This is grooming, straight up.
ThatrCOs what yourCOre trying to prove but
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
This is grooming, straight up.
Destroying ChildrenrCOs Natural Inhibitions and Norms
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not count?
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead, stole their sins, and
if they donrCOt behave properly will send them to hell. How do you justify that?
zendejo wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:48 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Stealing a child's innocenceFalse starting premise.
You LIE again.
This is grooming, straight up.
Dude, wake up before you post next time. He fully acknowledges it as >grooming. What he is saying is that you heterophiliacs steal a child's >innocence every day you push your "bible." You take away what a child
has and overwrite it with OBEY SHOP REPRODUCE.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08adc3$0$25 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:20 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
If American workers are so plentiful why
does Trump himself depend on immigrants?
"Several weeks later, the Labor Department posted an order for 12 more
foreign seasonal workers to work as servers at the same club."
Trump Organization sought to bring in
nearly 200 workers on visas in 2025
Nov 11
zendejo wrote:
some thing wrote:
Lie. They are demanding that the state pay for their "transition,"
Everyone gets some level of medical care.
Gender mutilation on demand is not "medical care".
Leftists get to change the definitions of words to whatever suits
them.
So we should all just accept our bodies as is?You conflate basic good container grooming with abridging God's design?
No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
"Your birth defect is God's design, live with it"
Gads.
Cleft palates are "God's design"
Crooked teeth are "God's design"?
Dwarfism is "God's design"?
Spina Bifida is "God's design"?
Sounds like your god should have stayed
in design class until the end of the semester.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:Nope.
On 5/16/26 12:09 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:48 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Stealing a child's innocenceFalse starting premise.
You LIE again.
This is grooming, straight up.
ThatrCOs what yourCOre trying to prove but
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
This is grooming, straight up.
Already responded to this. That is a propaganda
Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08ae2a$0$25
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:27 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:get
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a07d37e$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:58 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a079b92$0$55974$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 2:40 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:yeHNR.82810$112.55088 @fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story >>>>>>>>>> hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in >>>>>>>>> age-appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Many of us grew up watching the
cross-dressing Bugs Bunny and Elmer
Fudd and Daffy Duck and still held
on to our hetero orientations.
Cartoons. Neither Bugs Bunny nor Daffy Duck insisted on talking
directly to our kids and having them sit on their laps.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Then we sat thru Tootie and Ms
Doubtfire and Ru Paul and Birdcage
and still didn't get "recruited into
the gay lifestyle"
Fictional stories and characters played by actors who were clearly >>>>>>> heterosexual for comedic purposes. Rupaul wasn't funny though.
Rupaul was a loser we all enjoyed laughing at.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Even the drag shows of JD Vance
and Rudy Guiliani didn't convert us.
Cite please.
-a-a-a-a-a-a So where does this "recruitment"When they demand that our kids attend reading where these demons
kick in?
homosexualityto speak to them directly, touch them and ask them to touch them >>>>>>> back. It is in these sessions that they also normalize
shouldand encourage children to question gender norms. These demons
theall be hanged, but because our society has strayed from God,
-a-a-a-a-a-a And.....there is it.
-a-a-a-a-a-a The "God's law" angle.
-a-a-a-a-a-a I knew it was coming.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Tell us what God said about trans people.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
Corinthians 6:19: "Do you not know that your bodies are temples of
Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are >>>>> not your own; you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with
your bodies."
-a-a-a-a So we should all just accept our bodies as is?
-a-a-a-a No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
-a-a-a-a "Your birth defect is God's design, live with it"
-a-a-a-a Gads.
You conflate basic good container grooming with abridging God's design?
-a-a-a-a-a Cleft palates are "God's design"
-a-a-a-a-a Crooked teeth are "God's design"?
Oh no, God commands in Deuteronomy that the human cattle not be
blemished. Crooked teeth are a blemish. If one has a crooked tooth from birth, he can have it pulled and then when he gets to Heaven it will be replaced with a perfect straight tooth.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08ae5e$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:28 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a07d40c$0$26CHILD GROOMING IS WRONG.
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 10:12 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:McHNR.82723$112.63390@fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:25 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis.
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's >>>>>>>>>>> hetero sex
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be.
You're making up your own definitions again.
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic >>>>>>>>>> attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of >>>>>>>>>> the opposite sex or gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one,
apparently.
Idiot.-a It's truth.-a You're too stupid to see that.
You have an obvious nested agenda.
The only agenda is to educate people about the validity of trans
identity.
Trans people exist.
Gay people exist.
Black people exist.
Native Americans exist.
Immigrant people exist.
What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
The harm is in the fact that you brainwashed twat don't teach that
they exist; you teach that they need to be positioned above legal
citizens, especially white heterosexuals, merely because they are
transsexual demons, homosexual demons, niggers, savages or illegals.
Easy to see why this dreck is being posted anonymously......
What was Trump doing on Epstein Island?
Destroying ChildrenrCOs Natural Inhibitions and Norms
All religions seek to destroy natural
inhibitions (and common sense) and replace
them with dogma.
And they are not shy about their desire to aggressively attack and
break down natural and humanly universal sex-based inhibitions in your
very young boys and girls.
Catholic priests (and even nuns) have a
huge head start on that. When can we see a
rightwing vendetta against them?
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2For example, Lil Miss Hot MessrCOs (2020) picture book The Hips on the
Drag Queen Go Swish, Swish, Swish encourages kids to move their hips
in ways often coded as effeminate. This not only breaks the taboo of
acting effeminate or identifying with queer figures, but also opens
space for children to study drag as a source of creative inspiration.
Rebellion against norms is also paramount to their mission.
DQSH performers demonstrate a refusal to be told what to do.
DQSH is organized differently than the usual classroom experience. The
art of drag is defiant, playful, unruly.
Drag may offer insights into how educators might support a practice of
strategic defiance.
DQSH presents a queer relationship to educational experience. The
traditional role of the teacher, transformed in a loud and sparkling
queen, becomes delightfully excessive. She is less interested in
focus, discipline, achievement, or objectives than playful
self-expression. Her pedagogy is rooted in pleasure and creativity
borne, in part, from letting go of control.
Instead, drag is firmly rooted in play as a site of queer pleasure,
resistance, and self-fashioning.
In a broader context, fostering collective unruliness also helps
children to understand that they can have a hand in changing their
environment rCa drag may help elucidate the arbitrariness of rules.
In many cases, drag queens may not respond with answers [to questions
like rCLAre you a boy or a girl?rCY], but with questions meant to
complicate perceptions of gender and society.
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-
to-grooming-your-kids/
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08ae9a$0$25 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:30 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Trans people exist.You mean mentally-ill and/or sexually perverted people?
Is everyone different from you mentally ill?
Is witless absolutism the back 40 of your perceptual graveyard?
Just answer the question.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08a7e0$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 4:27 PM, Jamie Kingmann wrote:
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchairAs a percentage how many trans people are there compared to disabled
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
people?
Great question.
"Approximately 1% of the U.S. population (aged 13 and older)
identifies as transgender.
The CDC reports that 28.7% (nearly 1 in 4) of U.S. adults have a
disability.
The U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey cites 13.6% of the
general population."
Looks like the 1%rs are demanding more than their fair share.
If you want to play the numbers game:
How many black lung victims does there need to be to matter?
How many Agent Orange victims does there need to be to matter?
How many killed policemen does there need to be to matter?
How many maternal deaths does there need to be to matter?
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08a9b0$0$21 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:42 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
America needs
more people. And given the current low birth
rate that means immigrants.
Democrats need:
@ wage slaves for manual labor
Darn those Democrats and their
imported wage slaves, right?
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa4f$0$22 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
AI Overview
The Bible addresses sexual deviance through the umbrella term "sexual
immorality" (translated from the Greek word porneia). This encompasses
all sexual acts outside of God's design for monogamous,
The Bible?
Monogamy?
What?
In Genesis 4:19 Lamech took two wives for himself.
The name of the first was Adah, and the name of
the second was Zillah.
In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of
women without any limits to how many he can marry.
In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David
had six wives and numerous concubines.
In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300
concubines.
In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had
18 wives and 60 concubines.
In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he
loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."
In Deuteronomy 25:5 if a woman's husband dies, and she
didn't have any kids from him, then she must marry his
brother regardless whether he had a wife or not. '''
zendejo wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:48 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Stealing a child's innocenceFalse starting premise.
You LIE again.
This is grooming, straight up.
Dude, wake up before you post next time. He fully acknowledges it as grooming. What he is saying is that you heterophiliacs steal a child's innocence every day you push your "bible." You take away what a child
has and overwrite it with OBEY SHOP REPRODUCE.
zendejo wrote:
On 5/16/26 12:09 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:48 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Stealing a child's innocenceFalse starting premise.
You LIE again.
This is grooming, straight up.
ThatrCOs what yourCOre trying to prove but
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-
admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
This is grooming, straight up.
Destroying ChildrenrCOs Natural Inhibitions and Norms
Quit your attempts to usurp authority. OBEY SHOP REPRODUCE.
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican agenda of,
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of
your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not count?
"If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb us," which
aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get Hell." Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to any current Republican company lines?
phoenix wrote:
zendejo wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:48 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Stealing a child's innocenceFalse starting premise.
You LIE again.
This is grooming, straight up.
Dude, wake up before you post next time. He fully acknowledges it as
grooming. What he is saying is that you heterophiliacs steal a child's
innocence every day you push your "bible." You take away what a child
has and overwrite it with OBEY SHOP REPRODUCE.
Explain this!
https://lawsuit.org/general-law/republicans-have-an-obsession-with- transgender-pornography/
Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of
your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead, stole their sins,
and if they donrCOt behave properly will send them to hell. How do
you justify that?
It's because a woman took a banana from a tree in a story the man from
the dead told you before he arrived and you need to pray to him
because he is a grape.
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican agenda
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of
your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb us,"
which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get Hell."
Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to any
current Republican company lines?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate pleasure
in sex.
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n6s7msFccu0U4@mid.individual.net:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of
your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead, stole their sins,
and if they donrCOt behave properly will send them to hell. How do
you justify that?
It's because a woman took a banana from a tree in a story the man from
the dead told you before he arrived and you need to pray to him
because he is a grape.
Christianity: The belief that a
cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his
own father can make you live
forever if you eat his flesh and
telepathecally tell him you
accept him as your master, so he
can remove an evil force from your
soul that is present in humanity
because a rib-woman was convinced
by a talking snake to eat from a
magical tree - yep, makes perfect
sense.
On 5/16/26 12:19 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
So we should all just accept our bodies as is?You conflate basic good container grooming with abridging God's design?
No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
"Your birth defect is God's design, live with it"
Gads.
Cleft palates are "God's design"
Crooked teeth are "God's design"?
Dwarfism is "God's design"?
Spina Bifida is "God's design"?
Like GM, the Creator makes some models better than others.
Mitchell Holman wrote:illegals.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08ae5e$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:28 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a07d40c$0$26
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 10:12 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:McHNR.82723$112.63390@fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:25 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis. >>>>>>>>
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's >>>>>>>>>>>> hetero sexYou're making up your own definitions again.
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be. >>>>>>>>>>>
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic >>>>>>>>>>> attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of >>>>>>>>>>> the opposite sex or gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one, >>>>>>>>>> apparently.
Idiot.|e-a It's truth.|e-a You're too stupid to see that.
You have an obvious nested agenda.
The only agenda is to educate people about the validity of trans >>>>>>> identity.
Trans people exist.
Gay people exist.
Black people exist.
Native Americans exist.
Immigrant people exist.
What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
The harm is in the fact that you brainwashed twat don't teach that
they exist; you teach that they need to be positioned above legal
citizens, especially white heterosexuals, merely because they are
transsexual demons, homosexual demons, niggers, savages or
yourCHILD GROOMING IS WRONG.
Easy to see why this dreck is being posted anonymously......
What was Trump doing on Epstein Island?
Destroying Children|ore4raos Natural Inhibitions and Norms
All religions seek to destroy natural
inhibitions (and common sense) and replace
them with dogma.
And they are not shy about their desire to aggressively attack and
break down natural and humanly universal sex-based inhibitions in
very young boys and girls.
Catholic priests (and even nuns) have a
huge head start on that. When can we see a
rightwing vendetta against them?
Leviticus 19:17
``Do not hate a fellow Israelite in your heart. Rebuke your neighbor
frankly so you will not share in their guilt.''
On 5/16/26 12:51 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08a7e0$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 4:27 PM, Jamie Kingmann wrote:
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchairAs a percentage how many trans people are there compared to disabled
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
people?
Great question.
"Approximately 1% of the U.S. population (aged 13 and older)
identifies as transgender.
The CDC reports that 28.7% (nearly 1 in 4) of U.S. adults have a
disability.
The U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey cites 13.6% of the
general population."
Looks like the 1%rs are demanding more than their fair share.
If you want to play the numbers game:
How many black lung victims does there need to be to matter?
How many Agent Orange victims does there need to be to matter?
How many killed policemen does there need to be to matter?
How many maternal deaths does there need to be to matter?
Given all the above have been recognized and made whole ftmp, what is
your non sequitur aimed at?
On 5/16/26 12:55 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08a9b0$0$21
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:42 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
America needs
more people. And given the current low birth
rate that means immigrants.
Democrats need:
@ wage slaves for manual labor
Darn those Democrats and their
imported wage slaves, right?
Right!
https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/08/04/democrats-use-illegal-aliens-to- obtain-cheap-labor-to-support-their-lifestyles/
What happens when U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement rescues 14 children from labor exploitation
and exposure to sex offenders
On 5/16/26 1:00 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa4f$0$22Yes, the New Testament firmly supports and establishes monogamy as the normative ideal for marriage.
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
AI Overview
The Bible addresses sexual deviance through the umbrella term
"sexual immorality" (translated from the Greek word porneia). This
encompasses all sexual acts outside of God's design for monogamous,
The Bible?
Monogamy?
What?
In Genesis 4:19 Lamech took two wives for himself.
The name of the first was Adah, and the name of
the second was Zillah.
In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of
women without any limits to how many he can marry.
In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David
had six wives and numerous concubines.
In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300
concubines.
In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had
18 wives and 60 concubines.
In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he
loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."
In Deuteronomy 25:5 if a woman's husband dies, and she
didn't have any kids from him, then she must marry his
brother regardless whether he had a wife or not. '''
Jesus explicitly reaffirmed GodrCOs
original creational design, quoting Genesis to define marriage as a
lifelong union between one man and one woman who become "one flesh"
(Matthew 19:4-6; Mark 10:6-9). This teaching implies the exclusion of polygamy, as the union is strictly between two individuals.
On 5/15/26 8:08 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Special entitlements.
Herd mentality.
Tribalism.
And others.
Those are right wing bot terms.
Says a left wing homo bot denying God's grace.
On 5/15/26 8:08 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
-a-a-a-a "God assigned" everyone to be female.
-a-a-a-a Including you.
Explain Adam.
--
And afterward may we delve into Lilith?
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in news:2reg0lts1nufjserela927bf3g3lqmdegl@4ax.com:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
America needs
more people. And given the current low birth
rate that means immigrants.
Fine, vet them and allow the best of them in. Don't just throw-open
the door and allow the dregs of the Earth (Muslims) to saunter in.
Has this never occurred to you? Is it not the *obvious* answer to the
problem?
If American workers are so plentiful why
does Trump himself depend on immigrants?
Trump businesses seek to hire more foreign
workers as his administration supercharges
deportations
August 7, 2025
https://tinyurl.com/3cch6hu7
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a07d37e$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:58 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a079b92$0$55974$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 2:40 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:yeHNR.82810$112.55088 @fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story
hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in
age-appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
Many of us grew up watching the
cross-dressing Bugs Bunny and Elmer
Fudd and Daffy Duck and still held
on to our hetero orientations.
Cartoons. Neither Bugs Bunny nor Daffy Duck insisted on talking
directly to our kids and having them sit on their laps.
Then we sat thru Tootie and Ms
Doubtfire and Ru Paul and Birdcage
and still didn't get "recruited into
the gay lifestyle"
Fictional stories and characters played by actors who were clearly
heterosexual for comedic purposes. Rupaul wasn't funny though.
Rupaul was a loser we all enjoyed laughing at.
Even the drag shows of JD Vance
and Rudy Guiliani didn't convert us.
Cite please.
So where does this "recruitment"When they demand that our kids attend reading where these demons get
kick in?
to speak to them directly, touch them and ask them to touch them
back. It is in these sessions that they also normalize homosexuality
and encourage children to question gender norms. These demons should
all be hanged, but because our society has strayed from God,
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
Corinthians 6:19: "Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the
Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are
not your own; you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with
your bodies."
So we should all just accept our bodies as is?
No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
"Your birth defect is God's design, live with it"
Gads.
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far
as I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom they stridently despise and disobey.
On 5/15/26 5:09 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Subject change.No thanks. I will stick to the topic... bigotry is wrong.
CHILD GROOMING IS WRONG.
Destroying ChildrenrCOs Natural Inhibitions and Norms
And they are not shy about their desire to aggressively attack and break down natural and humanly universal sex-based inhibitions in your very
young boys and girls.
For example, Lil Miss Hot MessrCOs (2020) picture book The Hips on the
Drag Queen Go Swish, Swish, Swish encourages kids to move their hips in
ways often coded as effeminate. This not only breaks the taboo of acting effeminate or identifying with queer figures, but also opens space for children to study drag as a source of creative inspiration.
Rebellion against norms is also paramount to their mission.
DQSH performers demonstrate a refusal to be told what to do.
DQSH is organized differently than the usual classroom experience. The
art of drag is defiant, playful, unruly.
Drag may offer insights into how educators might support a practice of strategic defiance.
DQSH presents a queer relationship to educational experience. The traditional role of the teacher, transformed in a loud and sparkling
queen, becomes delightfully excessive. She is less interested in focus, discipline, achievement, or objectives than playful self-expression. Her pedagogy is rooted in pleasure and creativity borne, in part, from
letting go of control.
Instead, drag is firmly rooted in play as a site of queer pleasure, resistance, and self-fashioning.
In a broader context, fostering collective unruliness also helps
children to understand that they can have a hand in changing their environment rCa drag may help elucidate the arbitrariness of rules.
In many cases, drag queens may not respond with answers [to questions
like rCLAre you a boy or a girl?rCY], but with questions meant to complicate perceptions of gender and society.
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits- to-grooming-your-kids/
On 5/15/26 9:00 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Lie. They are demanding that the state pay for their "transition,"Everyone gets some level of medical care.
Gender mutilation on demand is not "medical care".
It is a state-sponsored elective abomination.
You reek of evil.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08a6c8$0$20 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far as
I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom they
stridently despise and disobey.
Which "creator"?
Mankind has worshipped some 2500
seperate ones. Is there one in
particular you are talking about?
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa4f$0$22 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
AI Overview
The Bible addresses sexual deviance through the umbrella term "sexual
immorality" (translated from the Greek word porneia). This encompasses
all sexual acts outside of God's design for monogamous,
The Bible?
Monogamy?
What?
In Genesis 4:19 Lamech took two wives for himself.
The name of the first was Adah, and the name of
the second was Zillah.
In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of
women without any limits to how many he can marry.
In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David
had six wives and numerous concubines.
In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300
concubines.
In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had
18 wives and 60 concubines.
In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he
loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."
In Deuteronomy 25:5 if a woman's husband dies, and she
didn't have any kids from him, then she must marry his
brother regardless whether he had a wife or not. '''
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican agenda
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of
your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not count?
of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb us,"
which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get Hell."
Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to any current
Republican company lines?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate pleasure in sex.
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in news:n6rt1fFarpaU1 @mid.individual.net:
Mitchell Holman wrote:illegals.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08ae5e$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:28 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a07d40c$0$26
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 10:12 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:McHNR.82723$112.63390@fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:25 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis. >>>>>>>>>
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's >>>>>>>>>>>>> hetero sexYou're making up your own definitions again.
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be. >>>>>>>>>>>>
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic >>>>>>>>>>>> attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of >>>>>>>>>>>> the opposite sex or gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one, >>>>>>>>>>> apparently.
Idiot.|arCU|e-a It's truth.|arCU|e-a You're too stupid to see that. >>>>>>>>>>
You have an obvious nested agenda.
The only agenda is to educate people about the validity of trans >>>>>>>> identity.
Trans people exist.
Gay people exist.
Black people exist.
Native Americans exist.
Immigrant people exist.
What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
The harm is in the fact that you brainwashed twat don't teach that >>>>>> they exist; you teach that they need to be positioned above legal
citizens, especially white heterosexuals, merely because they are
transsexual demons, homosexual demons, niggers, savages or
yourCHILD GROOMING IS WRONG.
Easy to see why this dreck is being posted anonymously......
What was Trump doing on Epstein Island?
Destroying Children|a-o|orCU-4|orCR-os Natural Inhibitions and Norms
All religions seek to destroy natural
inhibitions (and common sense) and replace
them with dogma.
And they are not shy about their desire to aggressively attack and
break down natural and humanly universal sex-based inhibitions in
very young boys and girls.
Catholic priests (and even nuns) have a
huge head start on that. When can we see a
rightwing vendetta against them?
Leviticus 19:17
``Do not hate a fellow Israelite in your heart. Rebuke your neighbor
frankly so you will not share in their guilt.''
"If any man come to me, and hate not his father,
and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren,
and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot
be my disciple."
Luke 14:26
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n6s7msFccu0U4@mid.individual.net:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of
your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead, stole their sins,
and if they donrCOt behave properly will send them to hell. How do
you justify that?
It's because a woman took a banana from a tree in a story the man from
the dead told you before he arrived and you need to pray to him
because he is a grape.
Christianity: The belief that a
cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his
own father can make you live
forever if you eat his flesh and
telepathecally tell him you
accept him as your master, so he
can remove an evil force from your
soul that is present in humanity
because a rib-woman was convinced
by a talking snake to eat from a
magical tree - yep, makes perfect
sense.
On 2026-05-16 9:20 a.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in
news:2reg0lts1nufjserela927bf3g3lqmdegl@4ax.com:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
America needs
more people. And given the current low birth
rate that means immigrants.
Fine, vet them and allow the best of them in.-a Don't just throw-open
the door and allow the dregs of the Earth (Muslims) to saunter in.
Has this never occurred to you?-a Is it not the *obvious* answer to the
problem?
If American workers are so plentiful why
does Trump himself depend on immigrants?
Trump businesses seek to hire more foreign
workers as his administration supercharges
deportations
August 7, 2025
https://tinyurl.com/3cch6hu7
Foreign workers = skilled
Illegal immigrants = can't tie their own shoe laces
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08f990$0$24 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 12:51 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08a7e0$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 4:27 PM, Jamie Kingmann wrote:
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchairAs a percentage how many trans people are there compared to disabled >>>>> people?
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
Great question.
"Approximately 1% of the U.S. population (aged 13 and older)
identifies as transgender.
The CDC reports that 28.7% (nearly 1 in 4) of U.S. adults have a
disability.
The U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey cites 13.6% of the
general population."
Looks like the 1%rs are demanding more than their fair share.
If you want to play the numbers game:
How many black lung victims does there need to be to matter?
How many Agent Orange victims does there need to be to matter?
How many killed policemen does there need to be to matter?
How many maternal deaths does there need to be to matter?
Given all the above have been recognized and made whole ftmp, what is
your non sequitur aimed at?
Conservatives always make an issue
of a group being too small to matter
until it is a group THEY care about.
On 2026-05-16 9:27 a.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a07d37e$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:58 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a079b92$0$55974$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 2:40 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:yeHNR.82810$112.55088 @fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story
hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in >>>>>>> age-appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
-a-a-a-a-a Many of us grew up watching the
cross-dressing Bugs Bunny and Elmer
Fudd and Daffy Duck and still held
on to our hetero orientations.
Cartoons. Neither Bugs Bunny nor Daffy Duck insisted on talking
directly to our kids and having them sit on their laps.
-a-a-a-a-a Then we sat thru Tootie and Ms
Doubtfire and Ru Paul and Birdcage
and still didn't get "recruited into
the gay lifestyle"
Fictional stories and characters played by actors who were clearly
heterosexual for comedic purposes. Rupaul wasn't funny though.
Rupaul was a loser we all enjoyed laughing at.
-a-a-a-a-a Even the drag shows of JD Vance
and Rudy Guiliani didn't convert us.
Cite please.
-a-a-a-a-a So where does this "recruitment"When they demand that our kids attend reading where these demons get >>>>> to speak to them directly, touch them and ask them to touch them
kick in?
back. It is in these sessions that they also normalize homosexuality >>>>> and encourage children to question gender norms. These demons should >>>>> all be hanged, but because our society has strayed from God,
-a-a-a-a-a And.....there is it.
-a-a-a-a-a The "God's law" angle.
-a-a-a-a-a I knew it was coming.
-a-a-a-a-a Tell us what God said about trans people.
-a-a-a-a-a Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
Corinthians 6:19: "Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the
Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are
not your own; you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with
your bodies."
-a-a-a So we should all just accept our bodies as is?
-a-a-a No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
-a-a-a "Your birth defect is God's design, live with it"
-a-a-a Gads.
How is cutting off your own dick and sterilizing yourself equivalent to straightening your teeth?
On 2026-05-16 3:00 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa4f$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
And.....there is it.
-a-a-a-a-a The "God's law" angle.
-a-a-a-a-a I knew it was coming.
-a-a-a-a-a Tell us what God said about trans people.
-a-a-a-a-a Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
AI Overview
The Bible addresses sexual deviance through the umbrella term "sexual
immorality" (translated from the Greek word porneia). This encompasses
all sexual acts outside of God's design for monogamous,
-a-a-a The Bible?
-a-a-a Monogamy?
-a-a-a What?
In Genesis 4:19 Lamech took two wives for himself.
The name of the first was Adah, and the name of
the second was Zillah.
Context: It was one of the degenerate race of Cain who first
transgressed that original law of marriage, that two only should be one flesh.
In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of
women without any limits to how many he can marry.
In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David
had six wives and numerous concubines.
In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300
concubines.
In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had
18 wives and 60 concubines.
In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he
loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."
In Deuteronomy 25:5 if a woman's husband dies, and she
didn't have any kids from him, then she must marry his
brother regardless whether he had a wife or not. '''
Interestingly, every one of your examples comes from the Old Testament,
none from the New. Are you not aware that Christianity is based on the latter?
On 2026-05-16 9:43 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n6s7msFccu0U4@mid.individual.net:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead, stole their sins,
and if they donrCOt behave properly will send them to hell. How do
you justify that?
It's because a woman took a banana from a tree in a story the man from
the dead told you before he arrived and you need to pray to him
because he is a grape.
Christianity: The belief that a
cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his
own father can make you live
forever if you eat his flesh and
telepathecally tell him you
accept him as your master, so he
can remove an evil force from your
soul that is present in humanity
because a rib-woman was convinced
by a talking snake to eat from a
magical tree - yep, makes perfect
sense.
... and, into the bin you go.
On 2026-05-16 7:19 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican agenda
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of
your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not count? >>>>
of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb us,"
which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get Hell."
Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to any current
Republican company lines?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate pleasure in
sex.
In Islam, women are not allowed to enjoy sex. They must know that their
role is to produce children, nothing more. Additionally, while a man can
go to Heaven by dying for Islam or a number of good works, women can
only go to Heaven if their husbands were pleased with them... the same husbands who can divorce them merely by repeating the same sentence
three times. Men get 72 virgins if they get to Heaven, but women merely
get to hang out while their husband has sex with 72 virgins. If the
women were single and somehow manage to get to Heaven, they get a
husband to serve.
Is there no more ridiculous religion?
On 2026-05-16 3:00 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa4f$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
AI Overview
The Bible addresses sexual deviance through the umbrella term "sexual
immorality" (translated from the Greek word porneia). This encompasses
all sexual acts outside of God's design for monogamous,
The Bible?
Monogamy?
What?
In Genesis 4:19 Lamech took two wives for himself.
The name of the first was Adah, and the name of
the second was Zillah.
Context: It was one of the degenerate race of Cain who first
transgressed that original law of marriage, that two only should be one flesh.
In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of
women without any limits to how many he can marry.
In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David
had six wives and numerous concubines.
In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300
concubines.
In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had
18 wives and 60 concubines.
In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he
loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."
In Deuteronomy 25:5 if a woman's husband dies, and she
didn't have any kids from him, then she must marry his
brother regardless whether he had a wife or not. '''
Interestingly, every one of your examples comes from the Old Testament,
none from the New. Are you not aware that Christianity is based on the latter?
On 2026-05-16 9:27 a.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a07d37e$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:58 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a079b92$0$55974$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 2:40 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:yeHNR.82810$112.55088 @fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story
hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in >>>>>>> age-appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
Many of us grew up watching the
cross-dressing Bugs Bunny and Elmer
Fudd and Daffy Duck and still held
on to our hetero orientations.
Cartoons. Neither Bugs Bunny nor Daffy Duck insisted on talking
directly to our kids and having them sit on their laps.
Then we sat thru Tootie and Ms
Doubtfire and Ru Paul and Birdcage
and still didn't get "recruited into
the gay lifestyle"
Fictional stories and characters played by actors who were clearly
heterosexual for comedic purposes. Rupaul wasn't funny though.
Rupaul was a loser we all enjoyed laughing at.
Even the drag shows of JD Vance
and Rudy Guiliani didn't convert us.
Cite please.
So where does this "recruitment"When they demand that our kids attend reading where these demons get >>>>> to speak to them directly, touch them and ask them to touch them
kick in?
back. It is in these sessions that they also normalize homosexuality >>>>> and encourage children to question gender norms. These demons should >>>>> all be hanged, but because our society has strayed from God,
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
Corinthians 6:19: "Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the
Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are
not your own; you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with
your bodies."
So we should all just accept our bodies as is?
No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
"Your birth defect is God's design, live with it"
Gads.
How is cutting off your own dick and sterilizing yourself equivalent to straightening your teeth?
On 2026-05-16 1:18 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far
as I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom they
stridently despise and disobey.
They can despise and disobey him all they want while they're alive, but
they won't enjoy the consequences once they die.
On 2026-05-16 1:38 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 9:00 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Lie. They are demanding that the state pay for their "transition,"Everyone gets some level of medical care.
Gender mutilation on demand is not "medical care".
It is a state-sponsored elective abomination.
You reek of evil.
Once again, how does cutting off your own penis or breasts a cure for anything. The mere fact that doctors would do this means that the Hippocratic Oath is meaningless.
On 2026-05-16 2:39 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08a6c8$0$20
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far as >>>> I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom they
stridently despise and disobey.
Which "creator"?
Mankind has worshipped some 2500
seperate ones. Is there one in
particular you are talking about?
There is a reason God walked among us, and part of it was to let us know
the error of our ways in creating false idols.
On 2026-05-16 9:27 a.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a07d37e$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:58 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a079b92$0$55974$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 2:40 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:yeHNR.82810$112.55088 @fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story
hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids
in age-appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
Many of us grew up watching the
cross-dressing Bugs Bunny and Elmer
Fudd and Daffy Duck and still held
on to our hetero orientations.
Cartoons. Neither Bugs Bunny nor Daffy Duck insisted on talking
directly to our kids and having them sit on their laps.
Then we sat thru Tootie and Ms
Doubtfire and Ru Paul and Birdcage
and still didn't get "recruited into
the gay lifestyle"
Fictional stories and characters played by actors who were clearly
heterosexual for comedic purposes. Rupaul wasn't funny though.
Rupaul was a loser we all enjoyed laughing at.
Even the drag shows of JD Vance
and Rudy Guiliani didn't convert us.
Cite please.
So where does this "recruitment"When they demand that our kids attend reading where these demons
kick in?
get to speak to them directly, touch them and ask them to touch
them back. It is in these sessions that they also normalize
homosexuality and encourage children to question gender norms.
These demons should all be hanged, but because our society has
strayed from God,
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
Corinthians 6:19: "Do you not know that your bodies are temples of
the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You
are not your own; you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God
with your bodies."
So we should all just accept our bodies as is?
No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
"Your birth defect is God's design, live with it"
Gads.
How is cutting off your own dick and sterilizing yourself equivalent
to straightening your teeth?
On 2026-05-16 1:38 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 9:00 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Lie. They are demanding that the state pay for their "transition,"Everyone gets some level of medical care.
Gender mutilation on demand is not "medical care".
It is a state-sponsored elective abomination.
You reek of evil.
Once again, how does cutting off your own penis or breasts a cure for anything.
On 2026-05-16 2:39 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08a6c8$0$20
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as
far as I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by
God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom
they stridently despise and disobey.
Which "creator"?
Mankind has worshipped some 2500
seperate ones. Is there one in
particular you are talking about?
There is a reason God walked among us, and part of it was to let us
know the error of our ways in creating false idols.
On 2026-05-16 3:00 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:encompasses
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa4f$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
AI Overview
The Bible addresses sexual deviance through the umbrella term "sexual
immorality" (translated from the Greek word porneia). This
all sexual acts outside of God's design for monogamous,
The Bible?
Monogamy?
What?
In Genesis 4:19 Lamech took two wives for himself.
The name of the first was Adah, and the name of
the second was Zillah.
Context: It was one of the degenerate race of Cain who first
transgressed that original law of marriage, that two only should be one flesh.
In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of
women without any limits to how many he can marry.
In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David
had six wives and numerous concubines.
In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300
concubines.
In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had
18 wives and 60 concubines.
In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he
loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."
In Deuteronomy 25:5 if a woman's husband dies, and she
didn't have any kids from him, then she must marry his
brother regardless whether he had a wife or not. '''
Interestingly, every one of your examples comes from the Old Testament,
none from the New.
Are you not aware that Christianity is based on the
latter?
CrudeSausage wrote:"sexual
On 2026-05-16 3:00 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa4f$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
And.....there is it.
-a-a-a-a-a The "God's law" angle.
-a-a-a-a-a I knew it was coming.
-a-a-a-a-a Tell us what God said about trans people.
-a-a-a-a-a Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
AI Overview
The Bible addresses sexual deviance through the umbrella term
encompassesimmorality" (translated from the Greek word porneia). This
oneall sexual acts outside of God's design for monogamous,
-a-a-a The Bible?
-a-a-a Monogamy?
-a-a-a What?
In Genesis 4:19 Lamech took two wives for himself.
The name of the first was Adah, and the name of
the second was Zillah.
Context: It was one of the degenerate race of Cain who first
transgressed that original law of marriage, that two only should be
Testament,flesh.
In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of
women without any limits to how many he can marry.
In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David
had six wives and numerous concubines.
In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300
concubines.
In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had
18 wives and 60 concubines.
In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he
loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."
In Deuteronomy 25:5 if a woman's husband dies, and she
didn't have any kids from him, then she must marry his
brother regardless whether he had a wife or not. '''
Interestingly, every one of your examples comes from the Old
none from the New. Are you not aware that Christianity is based on theCatholicism isn't thankfully. Fuck Christians. Catholicism is the only
latter?
true Christianity. Tell me how they listened to what Jesus said on the
cross to the two thieves. Where was the hidden microphone?
On 2026-05-16 7:19 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican agenda
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of
your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb us,"
which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get Hell."
Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to any
current Republican company lines?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate pleasure
in sex.
In Islam, women are not allowed to enjoy sex. They must know that
their role is to produce children, nothing more. Additionally, while a
man can go to Heaven by dying for Islam or a number of good works,
women can only go to Heaven if their husbands were pleased with
them... the same husbands who can divorce them merely by repeating the
same sentence three times. Men get 72 virgins if they get to Heaven,
but women merely get to hang out while their husband has sex with 72
virgins. If the women were single and somehow manage to get to Heaven,
they get a husband to serve.
Is there no more ridiculous religion?
Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in news:n6rt1fFarpaU1Hey man, and I'm only going to say this once, if they contradict, the
@mid.individual.net:
Mitchell Holman wrote:illegals.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08ae5e$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:28 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a07d40c$0$26
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 10:12 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:McHNR.82723$112.63390@fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:25 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis. >>>>>>>>>>
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hetero sexYou're making up your own definitions again.
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic >>>>>>>>>>>>> attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the opposite sex or gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one, >>>>>>>>>>>> apparently.
Idiot.|arCU|e-a It's truth.|arCU|e-a You're too stupid to see that. >>>>>>>>>>>
You have an obvious nested agenda.
The only agenda is to educate people about the validity of trans >>>>>>>>> identity.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Trans people exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Gay people exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Black people exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Native Americans exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Immigrant people exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
The harm is in the fact that you brainwashed twat don't teach that >>>>>>> they exist; you teach that they need to be positioned above legal >>>>>>> citizens, especially white heterosexuals, merely because they are >>>>>>> transsexual demons, homosexual demons, niggers, savages or
yourCHILD GROOMING IS WRONG.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Easy to see why this dreck is being posted anonymously......
-a-a-a-a What was Trump doing on Epstein Island?
Destroying Children|a-o|orCU-4|orCR-os Natural Inhibitions and Norms
-a-a-a-a All religions seek to destroy natural
inhibitions (and common sense) and replace
them with dogma.
And they are not shy about their desire to aggressively attack and
break down natural and humanly universal sex-based inhibitions in
very young boys and girls.
-a-a-a Catholic priests (and even nuns) have a
huge head start on that. When can we see a
rightwing vendetta against them?
Leviticus 19:17
``Do not hate a fellow Israelite in your heart. Rebuke your neighbor
frankly so you will not share in their guilt.''
"If any man come to me, and hate not his father,
and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren,
and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot
be my disciple."
Luke 14:26
Old Testament trumps the New Testament. There is far more legitimacy for
the Old Testament than the New Testament.
I am not speaking for any religion but myself. They say to follow God
and God alone and that's what I'm doing.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a09b615$0$21961$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-16 7:19 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican agenda
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb us,"
which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get Hell."
Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to any
current Republican company lines?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate pleasure
in sex.
In Islam, women are not allowed to enjoy sex. They must know that
their role is to produce children, nothing more. Additionally, while a
man can go to Heaven by dying for Islam or a number of good works,
women can only go to Heaven if their husbands were pleased with
them... the same husbands who can divorce them merely by repeating the
same sentence three times. Men get 72 virgins if they get to Heaven,
but women merely get to hang out while their husband has sex with 72
virgins. If the women were single and somehow manage to get to Heaven,
they get a husband to serve.
You DO know the Quran says nothing
about any "72 virgins", right?
https://www.justislam.co.uk/does-the-quran-really-promise-islamic- martyrs-virgins-p-216.html
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-83582-8_21
Is there no more ridiculous religion?
All religions are ridiculous.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-05-16 1:18 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far
as I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom they
stridently despise and disobey.
They can despise and disobey him all they want while they're alive, but they won't enjoy the consequences once they die.
If there is a deity it would hate you.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a09b04b$0$23 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-16 1:38 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 9:00 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Lie. They are demanding that the state pay for their "transition,"Everyone gets some level of medical care.
Gender mutilation on demand is not "medical care".
It is a state-sponsored elective abomination.
You reek of evil.
Once again, how does cutting off your own penis or breasts a cure for anything.
Why does people you don't even
know doing that bother you?
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a09b2e5$0$8464$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-16 2:39 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08a6c8$0$20
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as
far as I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by
God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom
they stridently despise and disobey.
Which "creator"?
Mankind has worshipped some 2500
seperate ones. Is there one in
particular you are talking about?
There is a reason God walked among us, and part of it was to let us
know the error of our ways in creating false idols.
Of course. History is full quiant
mythology and invented beings.
They are all false gods.
Except the one YOU worship.
THAT one is real.
Sheesh................
https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com
Great resource.
In article <XnsB44F558321D8C629555@185.151.15.190>,
noemail@aol.com says...
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a09b04b$0$23
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-16 1:38 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 9:00 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Lie. They are demanding that the state pay for their "transition,"Everyone gets some level of medical care.
Gender mutilation on demand is not "medical care".
It is a state-sponsored elective abomination.
You reek of evil.
Once again, how does cutting off your own penis or breasts a cure for
anything.
Why does people you don't even
know doing that bother you?
Why can't you just answer the question?
In article <6a09bfc6$1$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-05-16 1:18 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far >>>>> as I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom they
stridently despise and disobey.
They can despise and disobey him all they want while they're alive, but
they won't enjoy the consequences once they die.
If there is a deity it would hate you.
Like YOU can decide that?
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n6s7msFccu0U4@mid.individual.net:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of
your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead, stole their sins,
and if they donrCOt behave properly will send them to hell. How do
you justify that?
It's because a woman took a banana from a tree in a story the man from
the dead told you before he arrived and you need to pray to him
because he is a grape.
Christianity: The belief that a
cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his
own father can make you live
forever if you eat his flesh and
telepathecally tell him you
accept him as your master, so he
can remove an evil force from your
soul that is present in humanity
because a rib-woman was convinced
by a talking snake to eat from a
magical tree - yep, makes perfect
sense.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08fb7a$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican agenda
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of
your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb us,"
which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get Hell."
Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to any
current Republican company lines?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate pleasure
in sex.
It is not a "muslim trait".
The Quran does
not even mention it. It is an African tribal
practice that predates Islam.
The fact that
some who practice are also Muslims is not a
causal link.
Is child molesting a Christian
thing just because Christians do it?
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08f708$0$22 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 12:19 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Cleft palates are "God's design"So we should all just accept our bodies as is?You conflate basic good container grooming with abridging God's design? >>>
No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
"Your birth defect is God's design, live with it"
Gads.
Crooked teeth are "God's design"?
Dwarfism is "God's design"?
Spina Bifida is "God's design"?
Like GM, the Creator makes some models better than others.
A god who makes mistakes.
And you worship him?
Why?
On 2026-05-17 12:15 p.m., Skeeter wrote:but
In article <6a09bfc6$1$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-05-16 1:18 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far >>>>>> as I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom they >>>>> stridently despise and disobey.
They can despise and disobey him all they want while they're alive,
they won't enjoy the consequences once they die.
If there is a deity it would hate you.
Like YOU can decide that?
In addition to being an expert on every topic under the sun including
me, Sodomite Snit is now an expert on Christianity and even God.
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in news:n6rt1fFarpaU1 @mid.individual.net:
Mitchell Holman wrote:illegals.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08ae5e$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:28 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a07d40c$0$26
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 10:12 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:McHNR.82723$112.63390@fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:25 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis. >>>>>>>>>
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's >>>>>>>>>>>>> hetero sexYou're making up your own definitions again.
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be. >>>>>>>>>>>>
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic >>>>>>>>>>>> attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of >>>>>>>>>>>> the opposite sex or gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one, >>>>>>>>>>> apparently.
Idiot.|e-a It's truth.|e-a You're too stupid to see that.
You have an obvious nested agenda.
The only agenda is to educate people about the validity of trans >>>>>>>> identity.
Trans people exist.
Gay people exist.
Black people exist.
Native Americans exist.
Immigrant people exist.
What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
The harm is in the fact that you brainwashed twat don't teach that >>>>>> they exist; you teach that they need to be positioned above legal
citizens, especially white heterosexuals, merely because they are
transsexual demons, homosexual demons, niggers, savages or
yourCHILD GROOMING IS WRONG.
Easy to see why this dreck is being posted anonymously......
What was Trump doing on Epstein Island?
Destroying Children|ore4raos Natural Inhibitions and Norms
All religions seek to destroy natural
inhibitions (and common sense) and replace
them with dogma.
And they are not shy about their desire to aggressively attack and
break down natural and humanly universal sex-based inhibitions in
very young boys and girls.
Catholic priests (and even nuns) have a
huge head start on that. When can we see a
rightwing vendetta against them?
Leviticus 19:17
``Do not hate a fellow Israelite in your heart. Rebuke your neighbor
frankly so you will not share in their guilt.''
"If any man come to me, and hate not his father,
and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren,
and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot
be my disciple."
Luke 14:26
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08f990$0$24 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 12:51 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08a7e0$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 4:27 PM, Jamie Kingmann wrote:
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchairAs a percentage how many trans people are there compared to disabled >>>>> people?
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
Great question.
"Approximately 1% of the U.S. population (aged 13 and older)
identifies as transgender.
The CDC reports that 28.7% (nearly 1 in 4) of U.S. adults have a
disability.
The U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey cites 13.6% of the
general population."
Looks like the 1%rs are demanding more than their fair share.
If you want to play the numbers game:
How many black lung victims does there need to be to matter?
How many Agent Orange victims does there need to be to matter?
How many killed policemen does there need to be to matter?
How many maternal deaths does there need to be to matter?
Given all the above have been recognized and made whole ftmp, what is
your non sequitur aimed at?
Conservatives always
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08fa2e$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 12:55 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08a9b0$0$21
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:42 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
America needs
more people. And given the current low birth
rate that means immigrants.
Democrats need:
@ wage slaves for manual labor
Darn those Democrats and their
imported wage slaves, right?
Right!
https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/08/04/democrats-use-illegal-aliens-to-
obtain-cheap-labor-to-support-their-lifestyles/
What happens when U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement rescues 14
children from labor exploitation
Labor exploitation? Like the child workers
in Chinese sweatshops making products for rich
American industrialists?
and exposure to sex offenders
Sex offenders like American
priests and preachers and pastors?
Here's a list of every Texas pastor accused
of child sex abuse this year
Mar. 18, 2025
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08faa3$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 1:00 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa4f$0$22Yes, the New Testament firmly supports and establishes monogamy as the
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
AI Overview
The Bible addresses sexual deviance through the umbrella term
"sexual immorality" (translated from the Greek word porneia). This
encompasses all sexual acts outside of God's design for monogamous,
The Bible?
Monogamy?
What?
In Genesis 4:19 Lamech took two wives for himself.
The name of the first was Adah, and the name of
the second was Zillah.
In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of
women without any limits to how many he can marry.
In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David
had six wives and numerous concubines.
In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300
concubines.
In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had
18 wives and 60 concubines.
In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he
loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."
In Deuteronomy 25:5 if a woman's husband dies, and she
didn't have any kids from him, then she must marry his
brother regardless whether he had a wife or not. '''
normative ideal for marriage.
1) Where does it state that?
2) So the Old Testament doesn't matter?
Jesus explicitly reaffirmed GodrCOs
original creational design, quoting Genesis to define marriage as a
lifelong union between one man and one woman who become "one flesh"
(Matthew 19:4-6; Mark 10:6-9). This teaching implies the exclusion of
polygamy, as the union is strictly between two individuals.
Polygamy was so common in the early
Christian community that leadership was
restricted to those Christians who DIDN'T
have multiple wives.
This is a true saying, if a man desire the
office of a bishop, he desireth a good work.
A bishop then must be blameless, the husband
of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour,
given to hospitality, apt to teach.
1 Timothy 3
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa88$0$22 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 8:08 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Special entitlements.
Herd mentality.
Tribalism.
And others.
Those are right wing bot terms.
Says a left wing homo bot denying God's grace.
Walk thru a pediatric cancer ward
and tell me more about "God's grace"
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs >>>>>>>>>>>>> or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns.
What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by
design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.
They were not people with birth defects, they were completely
normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is
usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children
into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is ordinary, >everything else is societal waste.
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists are >asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those >>>>>> who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aab9$0$22 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 8:08 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
-a-a-a-a "God assigned" everyone to be female.
-a-a-a-a Including you.
Explain Adam.
--
And afterward may we delve into Lilith?
And Cain's wife?
On 2026-05-16 1:18 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far
as I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom they
stridently despise and disobey.
They can despise and disobey him all they want while they're alive, but
they won't enjoy the consequences once they die.
On 2026-05-16 1:27 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 5:09 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Subject change.No thanks. I will stick to the topic... bigotry is wrong.
CHILD GROOMING IS WRONG.
Destroying ChildrenrCOs Natural Inhibitions and Norms
And they are not shy about their desire to aggressively attack and
break down natural and humanly universal sex-based inhibitions in your
very young boys and girls.
For example, Lil Miss Hot MessrCOs (2020) picture book The Hips on the
Drag Queen Go Swish, Swish, Swish encourages kids to move their hips
in ways often coded as effeminate. This not only breaks the taboo of
acting effeminate or identifying with queer figures, but also opens
space for children to study drag as a source of creative inspiration.
Rebellion against norms is also paramount to their mission.
DQSH performers demonstrate a refusal to be told what to do.
DQSH is organized differently than the usual classroom experience. The
art of drag is defiant, playful, unruly.
Drag may offer insights into how educators might support a practice of
strategic defiance.
DQSH presents a queer relationship to educational experience. The
traditional role of the teacher, transformed in a loud and sparkling
queen, becomes delightfully excessive. She is less interested in
focus, discipline, achievement, or objectives than playful self-
expression. Her pedagogy is rooted in pleasure and creativity borne,
in part, from letting go of control.
Instead, drag is firmly rooted in play as a site of queer pleasure,
resistance, and self-fashioning.
In a broader context, fostering collective unruliness also helps
children to understand that they can have a hand in changing their
environment rCa drag may help elucidate the arbitrariness of rules.
In many cases, drag queens may not respond with answers [to questions
like rCLAre you a boy or a girl?rCY], but with questions meant to
complicate perceptions of gender and society.
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-
admits- to-grooming-your-kids/
Sodomite Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser Prescott Parasite and
Computer Guy wants to allow demons to keep grooming children because it would be bigoted to _not_ allow them to traumatize children for life.
I long for the time when such idiotic comments would result in people getting excommunicated from their towns at best and hanged at the worst.
On 2026-05-16 2:39 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08a6c8$0$20
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far as >>>> I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom they
stridently despise and disobey.
-a-a-a Which "creator"?
-a-a-a Mankind has worshipped some 2500
seperate ones. Is there one in
particular you are talking about?
There is a reason God walked among us, and part of it was to let us know
the error of our ways in creating false idols.
On 2026-05-16 7:19 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican agenda
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of
your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not count? >>>>
of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb us,"
which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get Hell."
Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to any
current Republican company lines?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate pleasure
in sex.
In Islam, women are not allowed to enjoy sex. They must know that their
role is to produce children, nothing more. Additionally, while a man can
go to Heaven by dying for Islam or a number of good works, women can
only go to Heaven if their husbands were pleased with them... the same husbands who can divorce them merely by repeating the same sentence
three times. Men get 72 virgins if they get to Heaven, but women merely
get to hang out while their husband has sex with 72 virgins. If the
women were single and somehow manage to get to Heaven, they get a
husband to serve.
Is there no more ridiculous religion?
Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in news:n6rt1fFarpaU1Hey man, and I'm only going to say this once, if they contradict, the
@mid.individual.net:
Mitchell Holman wrote:illegals.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08ae5e$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:28 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a07d40c$0$26
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 10:12 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:McHNR.82723$112.63390@fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:25 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis. >>>>>>>>>>
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hetero sexYou're making up your own definitions again.
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic >>>>>>>>>>>>> attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the opposite sex or gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one, >>>>>>>>>>>> apparently.
Idiot.|arCU|e-a It's truth.|arCU|e-a You're too stupid to see that. >>>>>>>>>>>
You have an obvious nested agenda.
The only agenda is to educate people about the validity of trans >>>>>>>>> identity.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Trans people exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Gay people exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Black people exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Native Americans exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Immigrant people exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
The harm is in the fact that you brainwashed twat don't teach that >>>>>>> they exist; you teach that they need to be positioned above legal >>>>>>> citizens, especially white heterosexuals, merely because they are >>>>>>> transsexual demons, homosexual demons, niggers, savages or
yourCHILD GROOMING IS WRONG.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Easy to see why this dreck is being posted anonymously......
-a-a-a-a What was Trump doing on Epstein Island?
Destroying Children|a-o|orCU-4|orCR-os Natural Inhibitions and Norms
-a-a-a-a All religions seek to destroy natural
inhibitions (and common sense) and replace
them with dogma.
And they are not shy about their desire to aggressively attack and
break down natural and humanly universal sex-based inhibitions in
very young boys and girls.
-a-a-a Catholic priests (and even nuns) have a
huge head start on that. When can we see a
rightwing vendetta against them?
Leviticus 19:17
``Do not hate a fellow Israelite in your heart. Rebuke your neighbor
frankly so you will not share in their guilt.''
"If any man come to me, and hate not his father,
and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren,
and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot
be my disciple."
Luke 14:26
Old Testament trumps the New Testament. There is far more legitimacy for
the Old Testament than the New Testament.
I am not speaking for any religion but myself. They say to follow God
and God alone and that's what I'm doing.
On 2026-05-16 9:43 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n6s7msFccu0U4@mid.individual.net:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead, stole their sins,
and if they donrCOt behave properly will send them to hell. How do
you justify that?
It's because a woman took a banana from a tree in a story the man from
the dead told you before he arrived and you need to pray to him
because he is a grape.
-a Christianity: The belief that a
cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his
own father can make you live
forever if you eat his flesh and
telepathecally tell him you
accept him as your master, so he
can remove an evil force from your
soul that is present in humanity
because a rib-woman was convinced
by a talking snake to eat from a
magical tree - yep, makes perfect
sense.
... and, into the bin you go.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a09b2e5$0$8464$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-16 2:39 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08a6c8$0$20
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as
far as I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by
God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom
they stridently despise and disobey.
Which "creator"?
Mankind has worshipped some 2500
seperate ones. Is there one in
particular you are talking about?
There is a reason God walked among us, and part of it was to let us
know the error of our ways in creating false idols.
Of course. History is full quiant
mythology and invented beings.
They are all false gods.
Except the one YOU worship.
THAT one is real.
Sheesh................
You DO know the Quran says nothing
about any "72 virgins", right?
Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08f990$0$24Conservatives always make hyperbole about anything and everything,
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 12:51 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08a7e0$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 4:27 PM, Jamie Kingmann wrote:
"Special treatment" meaning wheelchairAs a percentage how many trans people are there compared to disabled >>>>>> people?
ramps and handicapped parking and wide
bathroom stalls. Yes, those are SUCH a
burden on the rest of us, right?
Great question.
"Approximately 1% of the U.S. population (aged 13 and older)
identifies as transgender.
The CDC reports that 28.7% (nearly 1 in 4) of U.S. adults have a
disability.
The U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey cites 13.6% of the >>>>> general population."
Looks like the 1%rs are demanding more than their fair share.
-a-a If you want to play the numbers game:
-a-a How many black lung victims does there need to be to matter?
-a-a How many Agent Orange victims does there need to be to matter?
-a-a How many killed policemen does there need to be to matter?
-a-a How many maternal deaths does there need to be to matter?
Given all the above have been recognized and made whole ftmp, what is
your non sequitur aimed at?
-a-a Conservatives always make an issue
of a group being too small to matter
until it is a group THEY care about.
like
when Kash Patel gets into the congressman grilling him he says that he
used the taxpayer dime to pay for his meal, when that was not it.
That's why it's just right to say Trump has a host of illegal immigrants tending his garden, and Mike Johnson farts out his ass while speaking to congress. DO you want me to continue?
CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2026-05-16 9:27 a.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:This is a question for Mike Johnson. Ask him and he will fart out his
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a07d37e$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 9:58 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a079b92$0$55974$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 2:40 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:yeHNR.82810$112.55088 @fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:29 AM, zendejo wrote:
And even worse - grooming and recruitment by drag queen story >>>>>>>>> hours.
That isn't grooming nor recruitment, it's merely exposing kids in >>>>>>>> age-appropriate ways to gender nonconformity.
-a-a-a-a-a Many of us grew up watching the
cross-dressing Bugs Bunny and Elmer
Fudd and Daffy Duck and still held
on to our hetero orientations.
Cartoons. Neither Bugs Bunny nor Daffy Duck insisted on talking
directly to our kids and having them sit on their laps.
-a-a-a-a-a Then we sat thru Tootie and Ms
Doubtfire and Ru Paul and Birdcage
and still didn't get "recruited into
the gay lifestyle"
Fictional stories and characters played by actors who were clearly >>>>>> heterosexual for comedic purposes. Rupaul wasn't funny though.
Rupaul was a loser we all enjoyed laughing at.
-a-a-a-a-a Even the drag shows of JD Vance
and Rudy Guiliani didn't convert us.
Cite please.
-a-a-a-a-a So where does this "recruitment"When they demand that our kids attend reading where these demons get >>>>>> to speak to them directly, touch them and ask them to touch them
kick in?
back. It is in these sessions that they also normalize homosexuality >>>>>> and encourage children to question gender norms. These demons should >>>>>> all be hanged, but because our society has strayed from God,
-a-a-a-a-a And.....there is it.
-a-a-a-a-a The "God's law" angle.
-a-a-a-a-a I knew it was coming.
-a-a-a-a-a Tell us what God said about trans people.
-a-a-a-a-a Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
Corinthians 6:19: "Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the >>>> Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are
not your own; you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with
your bodies."
-a-a-a So we should all just accept our bodies as is?
-a-a-a No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
-a-a-a "Your birth defect is God's design, live with it"
-a-a-a Gads.
How is cutting off your own dick and sterilizing yourself equivalent
to straightening your teeth?
ass and make it clear to you, Republican. Do your own research next time it's your party that lies and is hyperbolic.
Just know that you're playing right into Uniparty's hands when you do so.
"Christians are killing women in this country. And the poor. And
disabled. And the poor. Look at the "Bible Belt" where all of these
things and so much more are worse. We are in end-stage capitalized
fueled by right wing extremist Christians. Muslims do not do nearly
the harm." - Sodomite Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser
Fuck Christians. Catholicism is the only true Christianity.
How is cutting off your own dick and sterilizing yourself equivalent
to straightening your teeth?
Take that up with the "Live with the
body God made for you" crowd.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a09b04b$0$23 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-16 1:38 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 9:00 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Lie. They are demanding that the state pay for their "transition,"Everyone gets some level of medical care.
Gender mutilation on demand is not "medical care".
It is a state-sponsored elective abomination.
You reek of evil.
Once again, how does cutting off your own penis or breasts a cure for
anything.
Why does people you don't even
know doing that bother you?
Of course. History is full quiant
mythology and invented beings.
They are all false gods.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a09b464$0$19 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-16 3:00 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:encompasses
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa4f$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
AI Overview
The Bible addresses sexual deviance through the umbrella term "sexual
immorality" (translated from the Greek word porneia). This
all sexual acts outside of God's design for monogamous,
The Bible?
Monogamy?
What?
In Genesis 4:19 Lamech took two wives for himself.
The name of the first was Adah, and the name of
the second was Zillah.
Context: It was one of the degenerate race of Cain who first
transgressed that original law of marriage, that two only should be one
flesh.
In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of
women without any limits to how many he can marry.
In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David
had six wives and numerous concubines.
In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300
concubines.
In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had
18 wives and 60 concubines.
In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he
loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."
In Deuteronomy 25:5 if a woman's husband dies, and she
didn't have any kids from him, then she must marry his
brother regardless whether he had a wife or not. '''
Interestingly, every one of your examples comes from the Old Testament,
none from the New.
If the Old Testament doesn't
matter why is it the Bible? Even
Jesus talked about Adam and Noah
and Moses.
Are you not aware that Christianity is based on the
latter?
Funny that Christians are the
ones quoting Leviticus to justify
their homophobia and plastering
the Ten Commandments in schools.
Catholicism isn't thankfully. Fuck Christians. Catholicism is the onlyAnd Jesus talking to Satan in the
true Christianity. Tell me how they listened to what Jesus said on the
cross to the two thieves. Where was the hidden microphone?
desert. Who recorded that?
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a09b615$0$21961$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-16 7:19 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican agenda
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of
your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb us,"
which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get Hell."
Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to any
current Republican company lines?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate pleasure
in sex.
In Islam, women are not allowed to enjoy sex. They must know that
their role is to produce children, nothing more. Additionally, while a
man can go to Heaven by dying for Islam or a number of good works,
women can only go to Heaven if their husbands were pleased with
them... the same husbands who can divorce them merely by repeating the
same sentence three times. Men get 72 virgins if they get to Heaven,
but women merely get to hang out while their husband has sex with 72
virgins. If the women were single and somehow manage to get to Heaven,
they get a husband to serve.
You DO know the Quran says nothing
about any "72 virgins", right?
https://www.justislam.co.uk/does-the-quran-really-promise-islamic- martyrs-virgins-p-216.html
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-83582-8_21
Is there no more ridiculous religion?
All religions are ridiculous.
On 5/16/26 7:53 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08fb7a$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of
your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
agenda of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb
us," which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get
Hell." Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to
any current Republican company lines?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate
pleasure in sex.
It is not a "muslim trait".
It has become so:
Goo Goo AI:
"Female clitoridectomy, while practiced in many Muslim communities..."
The Quran does
not even mention it. It is an African tribal
practice that predates Islam.
And men get sliced too:
"Why is khatna performed in Muslims?
For Muslims, circumcision is also a matter of cleanliness,
purification and control over one's baser self (nafs). There is no
agreement across the many Islamic communities about the age at which circumcision should be performed."
The fact that
some who practice are also Muslims is not a
causal link.
Of course it is, no persons practicing it means no more genital
mutilations.
In article <6a09bfc6$1$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-05-16 1:18 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as far >>>>> as I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom they
stridently despise and disobey.
They can despise and disobey him all they want while they're alive, but
they won't enjoy the consequences once they die.
If there is a deity it would hate you.
Like YOU can decide that?
All the Bibles I see are in perfect
American English, they don't even use the vowell 'U' when spelling color or labor, so you know that God was American.
Why can't you just answer the question?I'll give you $20 to blow me.
On 5/16/26 7:57 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08f708$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 12:19 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
So we should all just accept our bodies as is?You conflate basic good container grooming with abridging God's
No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
"Your birth defect is God's design, live with it"
Gads.
design?
Cleft palates are "God's design"
Crooked teeth are "God's design"?
Dwarfism is "God's design"?
Spina Bifida is "God's design"?
Like GM, the Creator makes some models better than others.
A god who makes mistakes.
And you worship him?
Why?
A God who creates something as beautiful and grand as the Christ will
always be venerated.
On 5/17/26 7:02 AM, phoenix wrote:
Fuck Christians. Catholicism is the only true Christianity.
And yet their Roman forebears crucified the Christ, practiced polytheism right up until climate change shrank the influence and spread of Rome as
the multiple gods all afield to address crop failure and the people
became restive. The Emperor Constantine then recast their 'lot' to monotheism using a popular splinter sect of the time (Christians) as his model.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a09cacd$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
"Christians are killing women in this country. And the poor. And
disabled. And the poor. Look at the "Bible Belt" where all of these
things and so much more are worse. We are in end-stage capitalized
fueled by right wing extremist Christians. Muslims do not do nearly
the harm." - Sodomite Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser
Actually he is right.
The Bible Belt IS the murder belt
and the teen pregnancy belt and the
pornography belt and the divorce belt
and the obesity belt and the smoking
belt and the poverty belt and the low
life expectancy belt and the infant
mortality belt.
But hey, at least they attend
church more than anyone else, right?
On 5/17/26 7:29 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a09b04b$0$23This:
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-16 1:38 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 9:00 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Lie. They are demanding that the state pay for their "transition,"Everyone gets some level of medical care.
Gender mutilation on demand is not "medical care".
It is a state-sponsored elective abomination.
You reek of evil.
Once again, how does cutting off your own penis or breasts a cure for
anything.
Why does people you don't even
know doing that bother you?
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
This is grooming, straight up.
On 5/17/26 6:48 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2026-05-16 9:43 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:Arguing with atheists is pointless because while they attack religious "beliefs"
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n6s7msFccu0U4@mid.individual.net:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead, stole their sins, >>>>> and if they donrCOt behave properly will send them to hell. How do
you justify that?
It's because a woman took a banana from a tree in a story the man from >>>> the dead told you before he arrived and you need to pray to him
because he is a grape.
-a Christianity: The belief that a
cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his
own father can make you live
forever if you eat his flesh and
telepathecally tell him you
accept him as your master, so he
can remove an evil force from your
soul that is present in humanity
because a rib-woman was convinced
by a talking snake to eat from a
magical tree - yep, makes perfect
sense.
... and, into the bin you go.
at large they simultaneously refuse to confess that their
atheism in and of itself constitutes a "belief-based faith" of sorts.
On 5/17/26 6:35 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2026-05-16 7:19 p.m., zendejo wrote:Indeed.
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican agenda
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not count? >>>>>
of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb us,"
which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get Hell."
Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to any
current Republican company lines?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate pleasure
in sex.
In Islam, women are not allowed to enjoy sex. They must know that their
role is to produce children, nothing more. Additionally, while a man can
go to Heaven by dying for Islam or a number of good works, women can
only go to Heaven if their husbands were pleased with them... the same
husbands who can divorce them merely by repeating the same sentence
three times. Men get 72 virgins if they get to Heaven, but women merely
get to hang out while their husband has sex with 72 virgins. If the
women were single and somehow manage to get to Heaven, they get a
husband to serve.
Is there no more ridiculous religion?
On 5/16/26 7:43 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n6s7msFccu0U4@mid.individual.net:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead, stole their sins,
and if they donrCOt behave properly will send them to hell. How do
you justify that?
It's because a woman took a banana from a tree in a story the man from
the dead told you before he arrived and you need to pray to him
because he is a grape.
Christianity: The belief that a
cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his
own father can make you live
forever if you eat his flesh and
telepathecally tell him you
accept him as your master, so he
can remove an evil force from your
soul that is present in humanity
because a rib-woman was convinced
by a talking snake to eat from a
magical tree - yep, makes perfect
sense.
Secularity:The belief that somehow we "evolved" as humans despite a
fossil record lacking in linearity and pockmarked by geologic and
climatic evidence of multiple extinctions - nearly all of which are illustrated and recorded in the histories of human faith-based
communities as diverse as Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and multiple
"first nations" oral traditions and icons. In apostolic denial always of massively anachronistic pictographs, petroglyphs and geoglyphs all confirming basic religious narratives of a creator diety and associated helpers with technologies that somehow disappeared leaving only
lithified cautionary monuments behind.
On 5/16/26 8:28 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:the
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08faa3$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 1:00 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa4f$0$22Yes, the New Testament firmly supports and establishes monogamy as
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
AI Overview
The Bible addresses sexual deviance through the umbrella term
"sexual immorality" (translated from the Greek word porneia). This
encompasses all sexual acts outside of God's design for monogamous,
The Bible?
Monogamy?
What?
In Genesis 4:19 Lamech took two wives for himself.
The name of the first was Adah, and the name of
the second was Zillah.
In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of
women without any limits to how many he can marry.
In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David
had six wives and numerous concubines.
In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300
concubines.
In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had
18 wives and 60 concubines.
In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he
loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."
In Deuteronomy 25:5 if a woman's husband dies, and she
didn't have any kids from him, then she must marry his
brother regardless whether he had a wife or not. '''
normative ideal for marriage.
1) Where does it state that?
Do you ever read for comprehension?
"GooGoo AI Overview
anthology?2) So the Old Testament doesn't matter?
Do the first few chapters always define the conclusions of an
On 5/16/26 8:30 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa88$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 8:08 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Special entitlements.
Herd mentality.
Tribalism.
And others.
Those are right wing bot terms.
Says a left wing homo bot denying God's grace.
Walk thru a pediatric cancer ward
and tell me more about "God's grace"
Observe the remission and cured rate and tell us it does so without
God's grace?
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 7:43 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n6s7msFccu0U4@mid.individual.net:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead, stole their sins, >>>>> and if they donrCOt behave properly will send them to hell. How do
you justify that?
It's because a woman took a banana from a tree in a story the man from >>>> the dead told you before he arrived and you need to pray to him
because he is a grape.
Christianity: The belief that a
cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his
own father can make you live
forever if you eat his flesh and
telepathecally tell him you
accept him as your master, so he
can remove an evil force from your
soul that is present in humanity
because a rib-woman was convinced
by a talking snake to eat from a
magical tree - yep, makes perfect
sense.
Secularity:The belief that somehow we "evolved" as humans despite a
fossil record lacking in linearity and pockmarked by geologic and
climatic evidence of multiple extinctions - nearly all of which are
illustrated and recorded in the histories of human faith-based
communities as diverse as Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and multiple
"first nations" oral traditions and icons. In apostolic denial always of
massively anachronistic pictographs, petroglyphs and geoglyphs all
confirming basic religious narratives of a creator diety and associated
helpers with technologies that somehow disappeared leaving only
lithified cautionary monuments behind.
Your claims are not supported or accurate.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a09fe15$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:53 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08fb7a$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29|ore4->AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
agenda of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb
us," which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get
Hell." Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to
any current Republican company lines?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate
pleasure in sex.
It is not a "muslim trait".
It has become so:
Goo Goo AI:
"Female clitoridectomy, while practiced in many Muslim communities..."
And faith healing deaths are practiced
in many Christian communities. Does that
make it a Christian trait?
The Quran does
not even mention it. It is an African tribal
practice that predates Islam.
And men get sliced too:
"Why is khatna performed in Muslims?
For Muslims, circumcision is also a matter of cleanliness,
purification and control over one's baser self (nafs). There is no
agreement across the many Islamic communities about the age at which
circumcision should be performed."
Show us where the Quran even
mentions the practice.
The fact that
some who practice are also Muslims is not a
causal link.
Of course it is, no persons practicing it means no more genital
mutilations.
FGM is an "Islamic trait" to the same
degree as burning women at the stake as
witches is a "Christian trait".
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/17/26 6:35 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2026-05-16 7:19 p.m., zendejo wrote:Indeed.
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican agenda >>>>> of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb us,"
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not count? >>>>>>
which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get Hell."
Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to any
current Republican company lines?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate pleasure
in sex.
In Islam, women are not allowed to enjoy sex. They must know that their
role is to produce children, nothing more. Additionally, while a man can >>> go to Heaven by dying for Islam or a number of good works, women can
only go to Heaven if their husbands were pleased with them... the same
husbands who can divorce them merely by repeating the same sentence
three times. Men get 72 virgins if they get to Heaven, but women merely
get to hang out while their husband has sex with 72 virgins. If the
women were single and somehow manage to get to Heaven, they get a
husband to serve.
Is there no more ridiculous religion?
None of that is supported.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a09fe4c$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:57 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08f708$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 12:19 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
So we should all just accept our bodies as is?You conflate basic good container grooming with abridging God's
No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
"Your birth defect is God's design, live with it"
Gads.
design?
Cleft palates are "God's design"
Crooked teeth are "God's design"?
Dwarfism is "God's design"?
Spina Bifida is "God's design"?
Like GM, the Creator makes some models better than others.
A god who makes mistakes.
And you worship him?
Why?
A God who creates something as beautiful and grand as the Christ will
always be venerated.
The same god who created Parkinsons
and Alzheimers and Cholera and Smallpox
and Polio and Leprosy and birth defects?
Pardon us if we fail to find that
worthy of worship.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a0a001a$0$21 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 8:28 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:the
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08faa3$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 1:00 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa4f$0$22Yes, the New Testament firmly supports and establishes monogamy as
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
AI Overview
The Bible addresses sexual deviance through the umbrella term
"sexual immorality" (translated from the Greek word porneia). This >>>>>> encompasses all sexual acts outside of God's design for monogamous, >>>>>
The Bible?
Monogamy?
What?
In Genesis 4:19 Lamech took two wives for himself.
The name of the first was Adah, and the name of
the second was Zillah.
In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of
women without any limits to how many he can marry.
In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David
had six wives and numerous concubines.
In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300
concubines.
In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had
18 wives and 60 concubines.
In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he
loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."
In Deuteronomy 25:5 if a woman's husband dies, and she
didn't have any kids from him, then she must marry his
brother regardless whether he had a wife or not. '''
normative ideal for marriage.
1) Where does it state that?
Do you ever read for comprehension?
"GooGoo AI Overview
You said the New Testament.
Not an AI overview.
You can do better than that.
anthology?
2) So the Old Testament doesn't matter?
Do the first few chapters always define the conclusions of an
Either the Bible is God's Revealed Truth
or it is not.
Which is it?
On 5/16/26 8:03 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in news:n6rt1fFarpaU1
@mid.individual.net:
Mitchell Holman wrote:illegals.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08ae5e$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:28 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a07d40c$0$26
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 10:12 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:McHNR.82723$112.63390@fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:25 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis. >>>>>>>>>>
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hetero sexYou're making up your own definitions again.
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic >>>>>>>>>>>>> attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the opposite sex or gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one, >>>>>>>>>>>> apparently.
Idiot.|e-a It's truth.|e-a You're too stupid to see that. >>>>>>>>>>>
You have an obvious nested agenda.
The only agenda is to educate people about the validity of trans >>>>>>>>> identity.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Trans people exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Gay people exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Black people exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Native Americans exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Immigrant people exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
The harm is in the fact that you brainwashed twat don't teach that >>>>>>> they exist; you teach that they need to be positioned above legal >>>>>>> citizens, especially white heterosexuals, merely because they are >>>>>>> transsexual demons, homosexual demons, niggers, savages or
yourCHILD GROOMING IS WRONG.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Easy to see why this dreck is being posted anonymously......
-a-a-a-a What was Trump doing on Epstein Island?
Destroying Children|ore4raos Natural Inhibitions and Norms
-a-a-a-a All religions seek to destroy natural
inhibitions (and common sense) and replace
them with dogma.
And they are not shy about their desire to aggressively attack and
break down natural and humanly universal sex-based inhibitions in
very young boys and girls.
-a-a-a Catholic priests (and even nuns) have a
huge head start on that. When can we see a
rightwing vendetta against them?
Leviticus 19:17
``Do not hate a fellow Israelite in your heart. Rebuke your neighbor
frankly so you will not share in their guilt.''
"If any man come to me, and hate not his father,
and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren,
and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot
be my disciple."
Luke 14:26
"This jarring statement is one of the most famously difficult verses in
the New Testament. It is best understood through the following context
and interpretations:Relative Preference: In ancient Semitic languages,
the word "hate" was often an idiom used to mean "loving less" in
comparison. Jesus is not commanding literal malice toward family;
rather, He is stating that devotion to Him must be so complete that all other loves look like hate by comparison.The Cost of Discipleship: The
verse sits within a broader teaching about counting the cost of
following Jesus (Luke 14:25rCo33). Jesus expects his followers to
prioritize their spiritual commitment above everything else, including
their own personal comfort, safety, and closest earthly relationships.Balancing Scripture: This verse must be weighed against
other biblical teachings that command believers to love their neighbors, honor their parents (e.g., Ephesians 6:2), and love their spouses (e.g., Ephesians 5:25). "
On 5/16/26 8:31 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aab9$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 8:08 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
-a-a-a-a-a "God assigned" everyone to be female.
-a-a-a-a-a Including you.
Explain Adam.
--
And afterward may we delve into Lilith?
-a-a-a And Cain's wife?
Nope, we begin where I left off:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilith
Lilith (/-el+-l+-++/; Hebrew: +L+|+O+L+|+O+-, romanized: L-2l-2b|>; also spelled Lilit,
Lilitu, or Lilis) is a feminine figure in Mesopotamian and Jewish
mythology. According to accounts in the Talmud she is a primordial she- demon.[1][2] Based on Medieval Jewish folklore, Lilith is said to have
fled from the Garden of Eden because she did not want to submit to Adam.[3]
Lilith does not appear in the Hebrew Bible or any other biblical source, although her name is derived from a single word in the Book of Isaiah,
the meaning of which is debated by scholars.[4] She first appears in Mandaean and Jewish sources from late antiquity (500 AD onward), in historiolas rCo incantations that incorporate a short mythic story rCo that give partial descriptions of her.[5] She is mentioned in the Babylonian Talmud (at Eruvin 100b, Niddah 24b, Shabbat 151b, Bava Batra 73a), and
in the Zohar -o Leviticus 19a as "a hot fiery female who first cohabited with man".[6]
In some Jewish folklore, such as the Alphabet of Sirach (c.rCe700rCo1000 AD), Lilith appears as Adam's first wife, who was created at the same
time and from the same clay as Adam.[a] The legend of Lilith developed extensively during the Middle Ages, in the tradition of Aggadah, the
Zohar, and Jewish mysticism.[17] For example, in the 13th-century
writings of Isaac ben Jacob ha-Cohen, Lilith left Adam after she refused
to become subservient to him and then would not return to the Garden of
Eden after she had coupled with the archangel Samael.[18]
Interpretations of Lilith found in later Jewish materials are plentiful,
but little information has survived relating to the Sumerian, Assyrian,
and Babylonian views of this class of demons. Recent scholarship has disputed the relevance of two sources previously used to connect the
Jewish lilith to an Akkadian lil-2tu rCo the Gilgamesh appendix and the Arslan Tash amulets[19]
https://www.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/wjddcg/ why_dont_we_speak_about_the_book_of_enoch_or_even/?rdt=35388
On 5/17/26 6:21 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2026-05-16 2:39 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08a6c8$0$20
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as
far as
I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom they
stridently despise and disobey.
-a-a-a Which "creator"?
-a-a-a Mankind has worshipped some 2500
seperate ones. Is there one in
particular you are talking about?
There is a reason God walked among us, and part of it was to let us
know the error of our ways in creating false idols.
One of the first things the Jewish people did upon being freed was to erect-a graven idols to Moloch.
https://jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-cult-of-moloch
We need to stop red state Christian pedophila
CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women.
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>
1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>> design.
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said.
They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is
becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is
usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children >>>>>> into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is ordinary,
everything else is societal waste.
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists are- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those >>>>>>> who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
Why does that matter?
Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
Joe Biden is a Catholic, while Trump is an uworthy Protestant boor.
Mitchell Holman wrote:Another crass partisan deceit.
You DO know the Quran says nothing
about any "72 virgins", right?
Sure thing. The '72 virgins' myth was invented by their fellow right wing Christian fanatics.
zendejo wrote:Redundant absolutist rhetoric observed and dismissed.
Just know that you're playing right into Uniparty's hands when you do so.
Everybody has always
Actually he is right.
The Bible Belt IS the murder belt
and the teen pregnancy belt and the
pornography belt and the divorce belt
and
On 5/17/26 11:59 AM, Michael Knowles wrote:
CrudeSausage wrote:
(after first munging the groups followup protocol)
Joe Biden showered with his teenage daughter, regularly...
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>>> design.
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>>
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration.
You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said. >>>>>>>>>> They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is >>>>>>>>> becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is >>>>>>> usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or
behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children >>>>>>> into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
-a-a-a-a-a Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is ordinary, >>> everything else is societal waste.
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists are >>> asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those >>>>>>>> who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses"
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
-a-a-a-a-a Why does that matter?
-a-a-a-a-a Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
Joe Biden is a Catholic, while Trump is an uworthy Protestant boor.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fact-check-posts-claim-contents-181600349.html
Claim:
A diary authored by U.S. President Joe Biden's daughter, Ashley Biden, describes showers taken with her father when she was a child as
"probably not appropriate."
Rating: True
Note: On April 29, 2024, Snopes changed the rating of this fact check
from "Unproven" to "True" based on testimony provided by Ashley Biden.
In an April 8 letter to a New York judge requesting jail time for one of
the two people convicted of stealing her diary, Biden wrote "I will
forever have to deal with the fact that my personal journal can be
viewed online."
zendejo wrote:How about the Democrat kind?
I often wonder how much time you spent in it learning your own craven
and forging depravities.
I'm sick of Republican pedophiles
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a09fe15$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:53 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08fb7a$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
agenda of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb
us," which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get
Hell." Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to
any current Republican company lines?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate
pleasure in sex.
It is not a "muslim trait".
It has become so:
Goo Goo AI:
"Female clitoridectomy, while practiced in many Muslim communities..."
And faith healing deaths are practiced
in many Christian communities. Does that
make it a Christian trait?
The Quran does
not even mention it. It is an African tribal
practice that predates Islam.
And men get sliced too:
"Why is khatna performed in Muslims?
For Muslims, circumcision is also a matter of cleanliness,
purification and control over one's baser self (nafs). There is no
agreement across the many Islamic communities about the age at which
circumcision should be performed."
Show us where the Quran even
mentions the practice.
The fact that
some who practice are also Muslims is not a
causal link.
Of course it is, no persons practicing it means no more genital
mutilations.
FGM is an "Islamic trait" to the same
degree as burning women at the stake as
witches is a "Christian trait".
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a09fe4c$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:57 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08f708$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 12:19 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
So we should all just accept our bodies as is?You conflate basic good container grooming with abridging God's
No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
"Your birth defect is God's design, live with it"
Gads.
design?
Cleft palates are "God's design"
Crooked teeth are "God's design"?
Dwarfism is "God's design"?
Spina Bifida is "God's design"?
Like GM, the Creator makes some models better than others.
A god who makes mistakes.
And you worship him?
Why?
A God who creates something as beautiful and grand as the Christ will
always be venerated.
The same god who created Parkinsons
and Alzheimers and Cholera and Smallpox
and Polio and Leprosy and birth defects?
Pardon us if we fail to find that
worthy of worship.
zendejo wrote:
On 5/17/26 7:02 AM, phoenix wrote:
Fuck Christians. Catholicism is the only true Christianity.
And yet their Roman forebears crucified the Christ, practiced
polytheism right up until climate change shrank the influence and
spread of Rome as the multiple gods all afield to address crop failure
and the people became restive. The Emperor Constantine then recast
their 'lot' to monotheism using a popular splinter sect of the time
(Christians) as his model.
These places don't allow one to delete what has been written. Look at it this way: They are saying use of AI that offers hallucinations is
building false beliefs in people based on those hallucinations.
That
guy, CrudeSausage said that Christianity emphasizes the New Testament
more than the New Testament. I claim that this is false. His false
statement invoked quite a fury in me. All I remember is that there was
no emphasis on either in Catholicism except that a reading from the
Gospel in the New Testament always concluded the readings during mass.
The Gospel was definitely emphasized in Catholicism, the first four
books of the New Testament. Whereas I understand some sects of
Christianity focus quite a lot on the other books also.
However, I'm
getting real sick of seeing Romans 3:23 everywhere I go, including from Google's AI in an AI overview. If you only have one verse to support
your hideous dogma, there's a very thin sandwich you are feeding us all.
Now, before you get on the diving board to delve for supporting
Scripture I give you this admonition: Romans 3:23 doesn't say a word
about "Pharaoh." It doesn't say a word about "false idols." So please
don't bring me some Scripture with some extraneous bullshit regarding
those that you have no explanation for why it is in there for.
Let's go from there should you wish to continue this line of thought.
On 5/17/26 12:30 PM, phoenix wrote:
zendejo wrote:
On 5/17/26 7:02 AM, phoenix wrote:
Fuck Christians. Catholicism is the only true Christianity.
And yet their Roman forebears crucified the Christ, practiced
polytheism right up until climate change shrank the influence and
spread of Rome as the multiple gods all afield to address crop
failure and the people became restive. The Emperor Constantine then
recast their 'lot' to monotheism using a popular splinter sect of the
time (Christians) as his model.
These places don't allow one to delete what has been written. Look at
it this way: They are saying use of AI that offers hallucinations is
building false beliefs in people based on those hallucinations.
And leading to suicides as well.
That guy, CrudeSausage said that Christianity emphasizes the New
Testament more than the New Testament. I claim that this is false. His
false statement invoked quite a fury in me. All I remember is that
there was no emphasis on either in Catholicism except that a reading
from the Gospel in the New Testament always concluded the readings
during mass.
Fair enough.
The Gospel was definitely emphasized in Catholicism, the first four
books of the New Testament. Whereas I understand some sects of
Christianity focus quite a lot on the other books also.
Yes.
However, I'm getting real sick of seeing Romans 3:23 everywhere I go,
including from Google's AI in an AI overview. If you only have one
verse to support your hideous dogma, there's a very thin sandwich you
are feeding us all.
Agreed.
Now, before you get on the diving board to delve for supporting
Scripture I give you this admonition: Romans 3:23 doesn't say a word
about "Pharaoh." It doesn't say a word about "false idols." So please
don't bring me some Scripture with some extraneous bullshit regarding
those that you have no explanation for why it is in there for.
Let's go from there should you wish to continue this line of thought.
Context and Hope
"While Romans 3:23 provides the bad news of humanity's universal sin and separation from God, it is immediately followed by the good news of salvation.The very next verse, Romans 3:24, states: "and all are
justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus." Together, these verses emphasize that because everyone falls
short, everyone is saved in the same way: not by personal good works,
but as a free gift of God's grace and forgiveness."
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/17/26 6:48 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2026-05-16 9:43 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:Arguing with atheists is pointless because while they attack religious
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n6s7msFccu0U4@mid.individual.net:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not >>>>>>>> count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead, stole their sins, >>>>>> and if they donrCOt behave properly will send them to hell. How do >>>>>> you justify that?
It's because a woman took a banana from a tree in a story the man from >>>>> the dead told you before he arrived and you need to pray to him
because he is a grape.
-a Christianity: The belief that a
cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his
own father can make you live
forever if you eat his flesh and
telepathecally tell him you
accept him as your master, so he
can remove an evil force from your
soul that is present in humanity
because a rib-woman was convinced
by a talking snake to eat from a
magical tree - yep, makes perfect
sense.
... and, into the bin you go.
"beliefs"
I donrCOt care if a belief is religious or not. I care if itrCOs supported.
at large they simultaneously refuse to confess that their
atheism in and of itself constitutes a "belief-based faith" of sorts.
Generally a belief in the importance of evidence and repeatability. Sure.
But atheism is a lack of belief in a god, not a belief system in itself. ItrCOs like saying abstinence is a sexual position.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/17/26 6:35 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2026-05-16 7:19 p.m., zendejo wrote:Indeed.
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican agenda >>>>> of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb us,"
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not count? >>>>>>
which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get Hell."
Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to any
current Republican company lines?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate pleasure
in sex.
In Islam, women are not allowed to enjoy sex. They must know that their
role is to produce children, nothing more. Additionally, while a man can >>> go to Heaven by dying for Islam or a number of good works, women can
only go to Heaven if their husbands were pleased with them... the same
husbands who can divorce them merely by repeating the same sentence
three times. Men get 72 virgins if they get to Heaven, but women merely
get to hang out while their husband has sex with 72 virgins. If the
women were single and somehow manage to get to Heaven, they get a
husband to serve.
Is there no more ridiculous religion?
None of that is supported.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/17/26 7:29 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a09b04b$0$23This:
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-16 1:38 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 9:00 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Lie. They are demanding that the state pay for their "transition," >>>>>> Everyone gets some level of medical care.
Gender mutilation on demand is not "medical care".
It is a state-sponsored elective abomination.
You reek of evil.
Once again, how does cutting off your own penis or breasts a cure for
anything.
Why does people you don't even
know doing that bother you?
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
This is grooming, straight up.
The link does not back that conclusion.
rCa
But hey, at least they attendIrCOve heard Las Vegas has more churches per capita than any other city in the world.
church more than anyone else, right?
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 7:43 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n6s7msFccu0U4@mid.individual.net:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not
count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead, stole their sins, >>>>> and if they donrCOt behave properly will send them to hell. How do
you justify that?
It's because a woman took a banana from a tree in a story the man from >>>> the dead told you before he arrived and you need to pray to him
because he is a grape.
Christianity: The belief that a
cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his
own father can make you live
forever if you eat his flesh and
telepathecally tell him you
accept him as your master, so he
can remove an evil force from your
soul that is present in humanity
because a rib-woman was convinced
by a talking snake to eat from a
magical tree - yep, makes perfect
sense.
Secularity:The belief that somehow we "evolved" as humans despite a
fossil record lacking in linearity and pockmarked by geologic and
climatic evidence of multiple extinctions - nearly all of which are
illustrated and recorded in the histories of human faith-based
communities as diverse as Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and multiple
"first nations" oral traditions and icons. In apostolic denial always of
massively anachronistic pictographs, petroglyphs and geoglyphs all
confirming basic religious narratives of a creator diety and associated
helpers with technologies that somehow disappeared leaving only
lithified cautionary monuments behind.
Your claims are not supported or accurate.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a0a001a$0$21 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 8:28 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:the
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08faa3$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 1:00 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa4f$0$22Yes, the New Testament firmly supports and establishes monogamy as
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
AI Overview
The Bible addresses sexual deviance through the umbrella term
"sexual immorality" (translated from the Greek word porneia). This >>>>>> encompasses all sexual acts outside of God's design for monogamous, >>>>>
The Bible?
Monogamy?
What?
In Genesis 4:19 Lamech took two wives for himself.
The name of the first was Adah, and the name of
the second was Zillah.
In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of
women without any limits to how many he can marry.
In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David
had six wives and numerous concubines.
In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300
concubines.
In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had
18 wives and 60 concubines.
In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he
loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."
In Deuteronomy 25:5 if a woman's husband dies, and she
didn't have any kids from him, then she must marry his
brother regardless whether he had a wife or not. '''
normative ideal for marriage.
1) Where does it state that?
Do you ever read for comprehension?
"GooGoo AI Overview
You said the New Testament.
Not an AI overview.
You can do better than that.
anthology?2) So the Old Testament doesn't matter?
Do the first few chapters always define the conclusions of an
Either the Bible is God's Revealed Truth
or it is not.
Which is it?
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a0a009f$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 8:30 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa88$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 8:08 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Special entitlements.
Herd mentality.
Tribalism.
And others.
Those are right wing bot terms.
Says a left wing homo bot denying God's grace.
Walk thru a pediatric cancer ward
and tell me more about "God's grace"
Observe the remission and cured rate and tell us it does so without
God's grace?
You miss the point.
If God doesn't want children
to have cancer why do they?
On 5/17/26 12:32 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Arguing with atheists is pointless because while they attack religious
... and, into the bin you go.
"beliefs"
I donrCOt care if a belief is religious or not. I care if itrCOs supported.
Valid point.
at large they simultaneously refuse to confess that their
atheism in and of itself constitutes a "belief-based faith" of sorts.
Generally a belief in the importance of evidence and repeatability. Sure.
But atheism is a lack of belief in a god, not a belief system in itself.
ItrCOs like saying abstinence is a sexual position.
Non-belief by definition is a form of belief.
https://www.str.org/w/atheism-isn-t-simply-a-lack-of-belief
To say you simply lack a belief about something is to say that you have
no beliefs about it.
For example, if you asked me, rCLWho is the best
female polo player in Europe?rCY I wouldnrCOt know where to start. Why? Because I have no beliefs about the quality of womenrCOs polo in Europe,
or any other country for that matter. I truly lack a belief regarding
that question.
This is not the case with atheists. People donrCOt write books about
things they donrCOt have any beliefs about. No one debates about
non-beliefs. If they did, there would be nothing to talk about.
This attempt to change the definition of atheism to a lack of belief is
a tactic to try to shift the burden of proof.
But it wonrCOt work. The
belief that there is no God is a belief. And if the atheist thinks it is
a reasonable belief, he should have reasons to believe it.
On 2026-05-17 1:44 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/16/26 8:03 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in news:n6rt1fFarpaU1
@mid.individual.net:
Mitchell Holman wrote:illegals.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08ae5e$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:28 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a07d40c$0$26
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-15 10:12 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
news:McHNR.82723$112.63390@fx02.iad:
On 5/15/2026 11:25 AM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:48 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/15/2026 6:55 AM, chrisv wrote:True people, but way too studied a troll is the working thesis. >>>>>>>>>>>
zendejo wrote:
There's nothing wrong with that, it isn't even gay sex, it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hetero sexYou're making up your own definitions again.
that does the same activity that gay-male sex would be. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It is not "hetero sex".
"Hetero sex (heterosexuality) refers to sexual or romantic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> attraction, activity, or relationships between individuals of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the opposite sex or gender."
You don't know a ridiculous troll, when you encounter one, >>>>>>>>>>>>> apparently.
Idiot.|e-a It's truth.|e-a You're too stupid to see that. >>>>>>>>>>>>
You have an obvious nested agenda.
The only agenda is to educate people about the validity of trans >>>>>>>>>> identity.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Trans people exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Gay people exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Black people exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Native Americans exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Immigrant people exist.
-a-a-a-a-a-a What is the harm in teaching
that other people exist?
The harm is in the fact that you brainwashed twat don't teach that >>>>>>>> they exist; you teach that they need to be positioned above legal >>>>>>>> citizens, especially white heterosexuals, merely because they are >>>>>>>> transsexual demons, homosexual demons, niggers, savages or
yourCHILD GROOMING IS WRONG.
-a-a-a-a-a-a Easy to see why this dreck is being posted anonymously......
-a-a-a-a What was Trump doing on Epstein Island?
Destroying Children|ore4raos Natural Inhibitions and Norms
-a-a-a-a All religions seek to destroy natural
inhibitions (and common sense) and replace
them with dogma.
And they are not shy about their desire to aggressively attack and >>>>>> break down natural and humanly universal sex-based inhibitions in
very young boys and girls.
-a-a-a Catholic priests (and even nuns) have a
huge head start on that. When can we see a
rightwing vendetta against them?
Leviticus 19:17
``Do not hate a fellow Israelite in your heart. Rebuke your neighbor
frankly so you will not share in their guilt.''
"If any man come to me, and hate not his father,
and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren,
and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot
be my disciple."
Luke 14:26
Context: "In the same way, those of you who do not give up everything
you have cannot be my disciples." - Luke 14:33
"This jarring statement is one of the most famously difficult verses
in the New Testament. It is best understood through the following
context and interpretations:Relative Preference: In ancient Semitic
languages, the word "hate" was often an idiom used to mean "loving
less" in comparison. Jesus is not commanding literal malice toward
family; rather, He is stating that devotion to Him must be so complete
that all other loves look like hate by comparison.The Cost of
Discipleship: The verse sits within a broader teaching about counting
the cost of following Jesus (Luke 14:25rCo33). Jesus expects his
followers to prioritize their spiritual commitment above everything
else, including their own personal comfort, safety, and closest
earthly relationships.Balancing Scripture: This verse must be weighed
against other biblical teachings that command believers to love their
neighbors, honor their parents (e.g., Ephesians 6:2), and love their
spouses (e.g., Ephesians 5:25). "
These idiots want us to take everything in the New Testament literally
(even though there is a valid explanation for the terms) all the while insisting that we shouldn't take the Qu'ran literally when it demands
that Muslims kill Christians and Jews.
On 2026-05-17 1:59 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/16/26 8:31 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aab9$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 8:08 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
-a-a-a-a-a "God assigned" everyone to be female.
-a-a-a-a-a Including you.
Explain Adam.
--
And afterward may we delve into Lilith?
-a-a-a And Cain's wife?
Nope, we begin where I left off:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilith
Lilith (/-el+-l+-++/; Hebrew: +L+|+O+L+|+O+-, romanized: L-2l-2b|>; also spelled Lilit,
Lilitu, or Lilis) is a feminine figure in Mesopotamian and Jewish
mythology. According to accounts in the Talmud she is a primordial
she- demon.[1][2] Based on Medieval Jewish folklore, Lilith is said to
have fled from the Garden of Eden because she did not want to submit
to Adam.[3]
Lilith does not appear in the Hebrew Bible or any other biblical
source, although her name is derived from a single word in the Book of
Isaiah, the meaning of which is debated by scholars.[4] She first
appears in Mandaean and Jewish sources from late antiquity (500 AD
onward), in historiolas rCo incantations that incorporate a short mythic
story rCo that give partial descriptions of her.[5] She is mentioned in
the Babylonian Talmud (at Eruvin 100b, Niddah 24b, Shabbat 151b, Bava
Batra 73a), and in the Zohar -o Leviticus 19a as "a hot fiery female
who first cohabited with man".[6]
In some Jewish folklore, such as the Alphabet of Sirach (c.rCe700rCo1000
AD), Lilith appears as Adam's first wife, who was created at the same
time and from the same clay as Adam.[a] The legend of Lilith developed
extensively during the Middle Ages, in the tradition of Aggadah, the
Zohar, and Jewish mysticism.[17] For example, in the 13th-century
writings of Isaac ben Jacob ha-Cohen, Lilith left Adam after she
refused to become subservient to him and then would not return to the
Garden of Eden after she had coupled with the archangel Samael.[18]
Interpretations of Lilith found in later Jewish materials are
plentiful, but little information has survived relating to the
Sumerian, Assyrian, and Babylonian views of this class of demons.
Recent scholarship has disputed the relevance of two sources
previously used to connect the Jewish lilith to an Akkadian lil-2tu rCo
the Gilgamesh appendix and the Arslan Tash amulets[19]
https://www.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/wjddcg/
why_dont_we_speak_about_the_book_of_enoch_or_even/?rdt=35388
What's interesting about Lilith is that this particular demon seems to possess a lot of women. I've seen a few exorcisms in which the demon possessing the woman clearly identified herself as such. If I'm not mistaken, women she possesses are nymphomaniacs, but control their
husbands to an insane degree after marriage.
< snip >
On 2026-05-17 2:04 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/17/26 6:21 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2026-05-16 2:39 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08a6c8$0$20
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as
far as
I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom they >>>>> stridently despise and disobey.
-a-a-a Which "creator"?
-a-a-a Mankind has worshipped some 2500
seperate ones. Is there one in
particular you are talking about?
There is a reason God walked among us, and part of it was to let us
know the error of our ways in creating false idols.
One of the first things the Jewish people did upon being freed was to
erect-a graven idols to Moloch.
https://jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-cult-of-moloch
It's amazing how quickly these simpletons reverted to their old ways,
even after receiving God's direct aid.
On 2026-05-17 4:28 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/17/26 11:59 AM, Michael Knowles wrote:
CrudeSausage wrote:
(after first munging the groups followup protocol)
Joe Biden showered with his teenage daughter, regularly...
On 2026-05-14 10:11 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a065a87$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/14/26 4:45 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:18 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/14/26 2:38 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:31 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/11/26 11:03 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 5/10/2026 12:57 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2026 19:06:40 -0400You are not understanding the basic meaning of what I said. >>>>>>>>>>> They were not people with birth defects, they were completely >>>>>>>>>>> normal XY individuals with transgender identity.
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 6:25 PM, Eldon Chance wrote:1. Trans women are *not* normal, either statistically or by >>>>>>>>>>>> design.
On Sat, 9 May 2026 16:04:04 -0400What?-a They were perfectly normal, healthy trans women. >>>>>>>>>>>>
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2026 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Also, those are good looking girls even without their wigs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or breast padding or whatever. Amirite, Joel?
I have been massively aroused seeing porn images of 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural trans women.-a No breasts, no nothing, just straight >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> women with cocks and balls.
Iow - chemical chimeras...nature doesn't make unicorns. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
2. You conflate hermaphrodism with chemical alteration. >>>>>>>>>>>
"TG identity" is far from "normal".
But lately with mind control affirmations from the MSM it is >>>>>>>>>> becoming more numerous.
Normal includes everything that happens
Are you making up definitions to suit yourself?
AI Overview
"normal/-en||rm(+O)l/Normal generally describes something that is >>>>>>>> usual, ordinary, or expected. It refers to actions, states, or >>>>>>>> behaviors that conform to a standard, pattern, or average."
Cambridge Dictionary
Nothing "usual, ordinary, or expected" about brainwashing children >>>>>>>> into alternate sexual polarities.
At least we hope not.
Trans identity is solid theory.
But not "usual, ordinary, or expected".
-a-a-a-a-a Are you "ordinary"?
A man who is attracted to women and seeks to start a family is
ordinary,
everything else is societal waste.
Nobody is discriminating against them. In reality, what the leftists- trans identity isn't something most people experience, but those >>>>>>>>> who do should be treated as human beings.
As the overwhelming majority are.
"In 2024, FBI data showed anti-transgender and anti-gender
nonconforming bias motivated 527 recorded hate crime offenses" >>>>>>>>
Next strawman please!
So that's not a significant number of hate crimes?
In a nation of 350 million?
No, it's very low.
-a-a-a-a-a Why does that matter?
-a-a-a-a-a Does the low number of a minority
commuity (dwarfs, trans people, albinos,
gays, amputees) mean it is permissible
to discriminate against them?
are
asking is for the groups above getting special treatment because they
are a minority. You can't scream "equality!" all the while demanding
special treatment.
Joe Biden is a Catholic, while Trump is an uworthy Protestant boor.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fact-check-posts-claim-contents-181600349.html
Claim:
A diary authored by U.S. President Joe Biden's daughter, Ashley Biden,
describes showers taken with her father when she was a child as
"probably not appropriate."
Rating: True
Note: On April 29, 2024, Snopes changed the rating of this fact check
from "Unproven" to "True" based on testimony provided by Ashley Biden.
In an April 8 letter to a New York judge requesting jail time for one
of the two people convicted of stealing her diary, Biden wrote "I will
forever have to deal with the fact that my personal journal can be
viewed online."
Not once in church did a priest tell me that teenage me needed to take a shower with my dad.
zendejo wrote:
On 5/17/26 12:30 PM, phoenix wrote:
zendejo wrote:
On 5/17/26 7:02 AM, phoenix wrote:
Fuck Christians. Catholicism is the only true Christianity.
And yet their Roman forebears crucified the Christ, practiced
polytheism right up until climate change shrank the influence and
spread of Rome as the multiple gods all afield to address crop
failure and the people became restive. The Emperor Constantine then
recast their 'lot' to monotheism using a popular splinter sect of
the time (Christians) as his model.
These places don't allow one to delete what has been written. Look at
it this way: They are saying use of AI that offers hallucinations is
building false beliefs in people based on those hallucinations.
And leading to suicides as well.
That guy, CrudeSausage said that Christianity emphasizes the New
Testament more than the New Testament. I claim that this is false.
His false statement invoked quite a fury in me. All I remember is
that there was no emphasis on either in Catholicism except that a
reading from the Gospel in the New Testament always concluded the
readings during mass.
Fair enough.
The Gospel was definitely emphasized in Catholicism, the first four
books of the New Testament. Whereas I understand some sects of
Christianity focus quite a lot on the other books also.
Yes.
However, I'm getting real sick of seeing Romans 3:23 everywhere I go,
including from Google's AI in an AI overview. If you only have one
verse to support your hideous dogma, there's a very thin sandwich you
are feeding us all.
Agreed.
Now, before you get on the diving board to delve for supporting
Scripture I give you this admonition: Romans 3:23 doesn't say a word
about "Pharaoh." It doesn't say a word about "false idols." So please
don't bring me some Scripture with some extraneous bullshit regarding
those that you have no explanation for why it is in there for.
Let's go from there should you wish to continue this line of thought.
Context and Hope
"While Romans 3:23 provides the bad news of humanity's universal sin
and separation from God, it is immediately followed by the good news
of salvation.The very next verse, Romans 3:24, states: "and all are
justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by
Christ Jesus." Together, these verses emphasize that because everyone
falls short, everyone is saved in the same way: not by personal good
works, but as a free gift of God's grace and forgiveness."
Right, that is something. I realize I had forgotten about how when God created Adam there was an opening that he would be an equal to God. This
was not seen because Adam was disobedient.
On 5/17/26 12:32 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:Your fact-free dismissal is dismissed as...being fact free.
On 5/16/26 7:43 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n6s7msFccu0U4@mid.individual.net:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not >>>>>>>> count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead, stole their sins, >>>>>> and if they donrCOt behave properly will send them to hell. How do >>>>>> you justify that?
It's because a woman took a banana from a tree in a story the man from >>>>> the dead told you before he arrived and you need to pray to him
because he is a grape.
Christianity: The belief that a
cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his
own father can make you live
forever if you eat his flesh and
telepathecally tell him you
accept him as your master, so he
can remove an evil force from your
soul that is present in humanity
because a rib-woman was convinced
by a talking snake to eat from a
magical tree - yep, makes perfect
sense.
Secularity:The belief that somehow we "evolved" as humans despite a
fossil record lacking in linearity and pockmarked by geologic and
climatic evidence of multiple extinctions - nearly all of which are
illustrated and recorded in the histories of human faith-based
communities as diverse as Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and multiple
"first nations" oral traditions and icons. In apostolic denial always of >>> massively anachronistic pictographs, petroglyphs and geoglyphs all
confirming basic religious narratives of a creator diety and associated
helpers with technologies that somehow disappeared leaving only
lithified cautionary monuments behind.
Your claims are not supported or accurate.
On 5/17/26 12:32 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
Yes it does.https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
This is grooming, straight up.
The link does not back that conclusion.
rCa
On 5/17/26 12:32 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:Practice is support.
On 5/17/26 6:35 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2026-05-16 7:19 p.m., zendejo wrote:Indeed.
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican agenda >>>>>> of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb us,"
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not count? >>>>>>>
which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get Hell." >>>>>> Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to any
current Republican company lines?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate pleasure >>>>> in sex.
In Islam, women are not allowed to enjoy sex. They must know that their >>>> role is to produce children, nothing more. Additionally, while a man can >>>> go to Heaven by dying for Islam or a number of good works, women can
only go to Heaven if their husbands were pleased with them... the same >>>> husbands who can divorce them merely by repeating the same sentence
three times. Men get 72 virgins if they get to Heaven, but women merely >>>> get to hang out while their husband has sex with 72 virgins. If the
women were single and somehow manage to get to Heaven, they get a
husband to serve.
Is there no more ridiculous religion?
None of that is supported.
On May 17, 2026 at 2:06:09rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a0a2dc1$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/17/26 12:32 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
...
Valid point.Arguing with atheists is pointless because while they attack religious >>>> "beliefs"
... and, into the bin you go.
I donrCOt care if a belief is religious or not. I care if itrCOs supported. >>
Thanks. I try to have one at least once or twice a year. :)
at large they simultaneously refuse to confess that their
atheism in and of itself constitutes a "belief-based faith" of sorts.
Generally a belief in the importance of evidence and repeatability. Sure. >>> But atheism is a lack of belief in a god, not a belief system in itself. >>> ItrCOs like saying abstinence is a sexual position.
Non-belief by definition is a form of belief.
Then it is a "belief" to not accept Zeus or the Invisible Green Dragon.
https://www.str.org/w/atheism-isn-t-simply-a-lack-of-belief
Not an accurate source.
Not going line by line, but some issues:
-----
Rather, they assert it is simply a lack of belief. Given
this redefinition
-----
That is not a redefinition... that is the definition. To be fair, there are some who say they know there is no god. That could be considered a belief in the same way you might say Zeus is not real or there is no Invisible Green Dragon sitting in the corner of the room you are.
To say you simply lack a belief about something is to say that you have
no beliefs about it.
Do you have any beliefs about the Invisible Green Dragon in the corner of your
room?
For example, if you asked me, rCLWho is the best
female polo player in Europe?rCY I wouldnrCOt know where to start. Why?
Because I have no beliefs about the quality of womenrCOs polo in Europe,
or any other country for that matter. I truly lack a belief regarding
that question.
So you are an "atheist" in terms of best figure skaters.
This is not the case with atheists. People donrCOt write books about
things they donrCOt have any beliefs about. No one debates about
non-beliefs. If they did, there would be nothing to talk about.
In a vacuum, sure. But our culture(s) are swimming in theism. Of course it depends on the book and the point of view. If a book is arguing there is no god and cannot be a god, then THAT is a "belief". If the book is noting that the arguments for a god are not valid, that is merely noting that. It is not arguing there cannot be a god. That is where I am at... I see no reason to believe in a god and even find the idea rather silly (which is not to say I have anything against others disagreeing). But is it POSSIBLE there is a god? Just as it is possible the Pope is a bunch of squirrels in an automaton or there is the aforementioned Invisible Green Dragon in the corner of your room (and mine) there COULD be a god. Are any of these things likely? No... but there is no affirmative insisting they COULD NOT be true.
In day to day life, though, we just accept the Pope is not an automaton (no less a squirrel filled one) and the corners of our room are 100% green-dragon free (invisible or not). Similarly, in a day to day life I accept there is no god.
This attempt to change the definition of atheism to a lack of belief is
a tactic to try to shift the burden of proof.
That is the point: there is no proof of a god, especially one with any given features. No proof is needed for a lack of belief in one -- just as you do not
need to justify your (presumed) belief that the Pope is a person.
If people spent massive effort to insist the Pope was filled with squirrels, you might argue -- even write a book -- on why this belief is unsupported. You
might even say you know it is not true, using common day-to-day language. But,
I suppose, on a philosophical level you would not be able to "prove" your belief.
But it wonrCOt work. The
belief that there is no God is a belief. And if the atheist thinks it is
a reasonable belief, he should have reasons to believe it.
It is simple: just as with the Invisible Green Dragon and the Squirrel filled Pope, there is no reason to believe these things. No reason to believe in a deity. But that does not DISPROVE any of those suppositions.
With all this said... if you or someone else does believe in a deity, and it brings you peace, and even better if it helps you be a good person I say more power to you. Look at Mr. Rogers -- he was an amazing person and his religion very much informed his "ministry", if you want to call it that. He helped children and by all reports was kind to all around him. His views of religion helped shape that. He did religion "right". I have no issue with such views of
religion.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a09fe4c$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:57 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08f708$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 12:19 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
So we should all just accept our bodies as is?You conflate basic good container grooming with abridging God's
No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
"Your birth defect is God's design, live with it"
Gads.
design?
Cleft palates are "God's design"
Crooked teeth are "God's design"?
Dwarfism is "God's design"?
Spina Bifida is "God's design"?
Like GM, the Creator makes some models better than others.
A god who makes mistakes.
And you worship him?
Why?
A God who creates something as beautiful and grand as the Christ will always be venerated.
The same god who created Parkinsons
and Alzheimers and Cholera and Smallpox
and Polio and Leprosy and birth defects?
Pardon us if we fail to find that
worthy of worship.
On May 17, 2026 at 2:09:25rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a0a2e86$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/17/26 12:32 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:Your fact-free dismissal is dismissed as...being fact free.
On 5/16/26 7:43 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n6s7msFccu0U4@mid.individual.net:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not >>>>>>>>> count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead, stole their sins, >>>>>>> and if they donrCOt behave properly will send them to hell. How do >>>>>>> you justify that?
It's because a woman took a banana from a tree in a story the man from >>>>>> the dead told you before he arrived and you need to pray to him
because he is a grape.
Christianity: The belief that a
cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his
own father can make you live
forever if you eat his flesh and
telepathecally tell him you
accept him as your master, so he
can remove an evil force from your
soul that is present in humanity
because a rib-woman was convinced
by a talking snake to eat from a
magical tree - yep, makes perfect
sense.
Secularity:The belief that somehow we "evolved" as humans despite a
fossil record lacking in linearity and pockmarked by geologic and
climatic evidence of multiple extinctions - nearly all of which are
illustrated and recorded in the histories of human faith-based
communities as diverse as Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and multiple
"first nations" oral traditions and icons. In apostolic denial always of >>>> massively anachronistic pictographs, petroglyphs and geoglyphs all
confirming basic religious narratives of a creator diety and associated >>>> helpers with technologies that somehow disappeared leaving only
lithified cautionary monuments behind.
Your claims are not supported or accurate.
The fossil record is amazingly complete given the circumstances of how it was formed.
And we have a LOT more than that to back evolution... DNA, physical structures, embryology, biogeography, direct observation, and more.
Add to that there is no other competing model that holds any water.
Are we going to find out more about evolution and improve our understanding over time -- sure. But the basics: pretty much well established and understood.
OK, next: the Bible speaking of the multiple executions... nope.
It talks of a
flood that is NOT supported by the evidence.
What is interesting is looking at
the flood stories and seeing how they are similar and different. From that you
can tell a lot about how populations spread:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/09/150917091401.htm
https://www.science.org/content/article/black-sea-flood-theory-put-test
There was a better one I read some time back... not finding it now. Goes into how even before we had DNA evidence of population spread we could tell a lot from the myths, with a focus on the flood stories.
On May 17, 2026 at 2:08:02rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a0a2e33$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/17/26 12:32 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
...
Yes it does.https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
This is grooming, straight up.
The link does not back that conclusion.
rCa
Nope.
On May 17, 2026 at 2:06:40rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a0a2de1$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/17/26 12:32 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:Practice is support.
On 5/17/26 6:35 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2026-05-16 7:19 p.m., zendejo wrote:Indeed.
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd.
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican agenda >>>>>>> of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb us," >>>>>>> which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get Hell." >>>>>>> Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to any
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not count? >>>>>>>>
current Republican company lines?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate pleasure >>>>>> in sex.
In Islam, women are not allowed to enjoy sex. They must know that their >>>>> role is to produce children, nothing more. Additionally, while a man can >>>>> go to Heaven by dying for Islam or a number of good works, women can >>>>> only go to Heaven if their husbands were pleased with them... the same >>>>> husbands who can divorce them merely by repeating the same sentence
three times. Men get 72 virgins if they get to Heaven, but women merely >>>>> get to hang out while their husband has sex with 72 virgins. If the
women were single and somehow manage to get to Heaven, they get a
husband to serve.
Is there no more ridiculous religion?
None of that is supported.
What is claimed is not supported as mainstream practice.
You can find examples
of Christians, Jews, Muslims, atheists, or other groups doing wrong.
Granted,
in general atheists tend to be more for equal rights,
it is not fair to say
Christians and Jews and Muslims cannot be good people, too.
On 5/17/26 12:29 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a09fe4c$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:57 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08f708$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 12:19 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
-a-a-a So we should all just accept our bodies as is?You conflate basic good container grooming with abridging God's
-a-a-a-a-a-a No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs,
no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
-a-a-a-a-a-a "Your birth defect is God's design, live with it" >>>>>>>>
-a-a-a-a-a-a Gads.
design?
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Cleft palates are "God's design"
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Crooked teeth are "God's design"?
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Dwarfism is "God's design"?
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Spina Bifida is "God's design"?
Like GM, the Creator makes some models better than others.
-a-a-a-a-a A god who makes mistakes.
-a-a-a-a-a And you worship him?
-a-a-a-a-a Why?
A God who creates something as beautiful and grand as the Christ will
always be venerated.
-a-a-a-a The same god who created Parkinsons
and Alzheimers and Cholera and Smallpox
and Polio and Leprosy and birth defects?
The same God who made from Adam's rib.
-a-a-a-a Pardon us if we fail to find that
worthy of worship.
Pardon us if we find your strident, angry and deceitful faggotry to be
an abomination.
On 2026-05-17 4:47 p.m., zendejo wrote:
On 5/17/26 12:29 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a09fe4c$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:57 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08f708$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 12:19 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
-a-a-a So we should all just accept our bodies as is?You conflate basic good container grooming with abridging God's >>>>>>>> design?
-a-a-a-a-a-a No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs, >>>>>>>>> no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
-a-a-a-a-a-a "Your birth defect is God's design, live with it" >>>>>>>>>
-a-a-a-a-a-a Gads.
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Cleft palates are "God's design"
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Crooked teeth are "God's design"?
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Dwarfism is "God's design"?
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Spina Bifida is "God's design"?
Like GM, the Creator makes some models better than others.
-a-a-a-a-a A god who makes mistakes.
-a-a-a-a-a And you worship him?
-a-a-a-a-a Why?
A God who creates something as beautiful and grand as the Christ will
always be venerated.
-a-a-a-a The same god who created Parkinsons
and Alzheimers and Cholera and Smallpox
and Polio and Leprosy and birth defects?
The same God who made from Adam's rib.
In God's world, there is no Alzheimer's, cholera, smallpox, polio,
leprosy and birth defects. However, you need to die to see God's world.
Our world is ruled by Satan. John 12:31 "Now is the time for judgment on this world; now the prince of this world will be driven out."
-a-a-a-a Pardon us if we fail to find that
worthy of worship.
Pardon us if we find your strident, angry and deceitful faggotry to be
an abomination.
Faggots are possessed by demons. That's part of why they get such joy
from attacking Christ.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a09cacd$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
"Christians are killing women in this country. And the poor. And
disabled. And the poor. Look at the "Bible Belt" where all of these
things and so much more are worse. We are in end-stage capitalized
fueled by right wing extremist Christians. Muslims do not do nearly
the harm." - Sodomite Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser
Actually he is right.
The Bible Belt IS the murder belt
and the teen pregnancy belt and the
pornography belt and the divorce belt
and the obesity belt and the smoking
belt and the poverty belt and the low
life expectancy belt and the infant
mortality belt.
But hey, at least they attend
church more than anyone else, right?
In article <XnsB44F8560F4014629555@185.151.15.190>,
noemail@aol.com says...
We have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a09cacd$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
"Christians are killing women in this country. And the poor. And
disabled. And the poor. Look at the "Bible Belt" where all of these
things and so much more are worse. We are in end-stage capitalized
fueled by right wing extremist Christians. Muslims do not do nearly
the harm." - Sodomite Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser
Actually he is right.
The Bible Belt IS the murder belt
and the teen pregnancy belt and the
pornography belt and the divorce belt
and the obesity belt and the smoking
belt and the poverty belt and the low
life expectancy belt and the infant
mortality belt.
But hey, at least they attend
church more than anyone else, right?
You still don't get it. It's out earth. God gave it to us
along with freewill. What hapens is out fault.
Do you agree that Joel is a bigot who is prejudiced against people with college and graduate degrees? Isn't he promoting the Musk grifter idea
that people who drop out of high school can make it just as big as
everybody else? Isn't he saying that NASA needs more high school
dropouts in order to sabotage NASA?
Isn't Joel a bigot against people wearing glasses? A minority so marginalized they are not even ever mentioned when people talk about the handicapped the black the trans etc.? They don't even consider people wearing glasses, and Joel is a bigot against them.
Isn't Joel a troll as they said, he is manifesting some psychosocial
guru status that he can see through the crap because his high school
dropout background endowed him in the psylocibin arts? How do you feel empowering a bigot like him? He says that true genius is an art
possessed only by the highly charismatic, the guys with two tones of coloring in their hair who are so handsome even gentlemen feel attracted
to them until they found out they are total abusers like Joel?
These are some specific examples because I don't feel like typing intelligently right now. Joel has me in a mood. I invited him here to
speak and then he went into his retard spiel.
She [Joel's trans GF] isn't a guy.
"She" most certainly came out of the womb as one.
This would be why they say "assigned male at birth", at that stage
of development there's nothing to indicate they're transgender.
A state of surgical and hormonal drugs alteration from "as born".
She was born trans,
Wrong.
Infants are not aware of nor capable of articulating their gender.
but no one can tell that about an infant.-a She knew she was as a young
child.
How young?
Agreed.She hasn't taken the hormones.-a She's gorgeous while being
basically all natural.
Most men can't push out large breasts like that, implants then?
Yes, collagen.-a They look remarkably real, though.
But fake is fake.
Trans fake is still fake.
Her breasts are fake, her gender identity isn't fake.
It is what sHe deems it to be, but likely enhanced by indoctrination and
a feminized food supply.
Just stay away from children.Marvelous, wishing you all the best, both of you guys.Honestly if you back track the postings there is credibility of the >>>>> principals, if it's an act, so be it.
I know it sounds weird for Usenet, people like me are supposed to be
younger Gen Z whatever people, but in fact there are people older
than I am who are coming out as trans.-a I liked what I saw with
trans women so I pursued meeting one.
Thank you.
On 5/16/26 8:43 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <rBZNR.2735$6M1.1535@fx23.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 5/15/2026 5:01 PM, zendejo wrote:
Marvelous, wishing you all the best, both of you guys.Honestly if you back track the postings there is credibility of the >>>>>> principals, if it's an act, so be it.
I know it sounds weird for Usenet, people like me are supposed to be >>>>> younger Gen Z whatever people, but in fact there are people older than >>>>> I am who are coming out as trans.-a I liked what I saw with trans women >>>>> so I pursued meeting one.
Thank you.
So both of you are guys. You admitted it.
At long last.
On 5/17/26 7:27 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
How is cutting off your own dick and sterilizing yourself equivalent
to straightening your teeth?
Take that up with the "Live with the
body God made for you" crowd.
Tooth care is not equivalent to genital mutilation.
Mitchell Holman wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a09b2e5$0$8464$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-16 2:39 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08a6c8$0$20
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 4:13 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
When a trans adult has gone thru
the surgery, is anatomically a female
(Caitlyn Jenner, Rene Richards, Wendy
Carlos) what restroom should they use?
Bruce Jenner didn't go through with cutting his own dick off, as
far as I know. As for your question: the sex assigned to him by
God.
Oh now you've gone and done it, you invoked the Creator, He whom
they stridently despise and disobey.
Which "creator"?
Mankind has worshipped some 2500
seperate ones. Is there one in
particular you are talking about?
There is a reason God walked among us, and part of it was to let us
know the error of our ways in creating false idols.
Of course. History is full quiant
mythology and invented beings.
They are all false gods.
Except the one YOU worship.
THAT one is real.
Sheesh................
Throughout the New Testament, the overarching message regarding Zeusand
other Greek deities is that they are false. The biblical authorsworship
emphasize that idols are powerless creations of mankind, and the
of such gods takes away from the glory owed to the one true Creator.
On 5/17/26 7:38 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:"sexual
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a09b464$0$19
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-16 3:00 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa4f$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
AI Overview
The Bible addresses sexual deviance through the umbrella term
oneencompassesimmorality" (translated from the Greek word porneia). This
all sexual acts outside of God's design for monogamous,
The Bible?
Monogamy?
What?
In Genesis 4:19 Lamech took two wives for himself.
The name of the first was Adah, and the name of
the second was Zillah.
Context: It was one of the degenerate race of Cain who first
transgressed that original law of marriage, that two only should be
Testament,flesh.
In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of
women without any limits to how many he can marry.
In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David
had six wives and numerous concubines.
In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300
concubines.
In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had
18 wives and 60 concubines.
In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he
loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."
In Deuteronomy 25:5 if a woman's husband dies, and she
didn't have any kids from him, then she must marry his
brother regardless whether he had a wife or not. '''
Interestingly, every one of your examples comes from the Old
none from the New.
If the Old Testament doesn't
matter why is it the Bible? Even
Jesus talked about Adam and Noah
and Moses.
It is an historical record of great import as well as a chronicle of creation, duh.
Are you not aware that Christianity is based on the
latter?
Funny that Christians are the
ones quoting Leviticus to justify
their homophobia and plastering
the Ten Commandments in schools.
Funny that any attempt to support the 10 commandments (which underlay
our own legal system) is so unwelcome by secular demons.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a0a0588$0$24 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/17/26 7:27 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
How is cutting off your own dick and sterilizing yourself equivalent
to straightening your teeth?
Take that up with the "Live with the
body God made for you" crowd.
Tooth care is not equivalent to genital mutilation.
But circumcision is.
Opps.
What does God say about THAT?
On 2026-05-17 4:47 p.m., zendejo wrote:will
On 5/17/26 12:29 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a09fe4c$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:57 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08f708$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 12:19 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
-a-a-a So we should all just accept our bodies as is?You conflate basic good container grooming with abridging God's >>>>>>>> design?
-a-a-a-a-a-a No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs, >>>>>>>>> no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
-a-a-a-a-a-a "Your birth defect is God's design, live with it" >>>>>>>>>
-a-a-a-a-a-a Gads.
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Cleft palates are "God's design"
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Crooked teeth are "God's design"?
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Dwarfism is "God's design"?
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Spina Bifida is "God's design"?
Like GM, the Creator makes some models better than others.
-a-a-a-a-a A god who makes mistakes.
-a-a-a-a-a And you worship him?
-a-a-a-a-a Why?
A God who creates something as beautiful and grand as the Christ
always be venerated.
-a-a-a-a The same god who created Parkinsons
and Alzheimers and Cholera and Smallpox
and Polio and Leprosy and birth defects?
The same God who made from Adam's rib.
In God's world, there is no Alzheimer's, cholera, smallpox, polio,
leprosy and birth defects. However, you need to die to see God's world.
Our world is ruled by Satan. John 12:31 "Now is the time for judgment
on
this world; now the prince of this world will be driven out."
-a-a-a-a Pardon us if we fail to find that
worthy of worship.
Pardon us if we find your strident, angry and deceitful faggotry to be
an abomination.
Faggots are possessed by demons. That's part of why they get such joy
from attacking Christ.
Mitchell Holman wrote:This
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a0a001a$0$21
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 8:28 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08faa3$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 1:00 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa4f$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
AI Overview
The Bible addresses sexual deviance through the umbrella term
"sexual immorality" (translated from the Greek word porneia).
monogamous,encompasses all sexual acts outside of God's design for
eye?He did a pretty good job explaining your Luke quote, didn't he. He saidtheYes, the New Testament firmly supports and establishes monogamy as
The Bible?
Monogamy?
What?
In Genesis 4:19 Lamech took two wives for himself.
The name of the first was Adah, and the name of
the second was Zillah.
In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of
women without any limits to how many he can marry.
In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David
had six wives and numerous concubines.
In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300
concubines.
In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had
18 wives and 60 concubines.
In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he
loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."
In Deuteronomy 25:5 if a woman's husband dies, and she
didn't have any kids from him, then she must marry his
brother regardless whether he had a wife or not. '''
normative ideal for marriage.
1) Where does it state that?
Do you ever read for comprehension?
"GooGoo AI Overview
You said the New Testament.
Not an AI overview.
You can do better than that.
anthology?
2) So the Old Testament doesn't matter?
Do the first few chapters always define the conclusions of an
Either the Bible is God's Revealed Truth
or it is not.
Which is it?
hate was the absence of love or the lesser love. Why didn't you
acknowledge his good wisdom there or do you have a mote in your own
On 5/17/26 12:38 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a0a009f$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 8:30 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa88$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 8:08 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Special entitlements.
Herd mentality.
Tribalism.
And others.
Those are right wing bot terms.
Says a left wing homo bot denying God's grace.
Walk thru a pediatric cancer ward
and tell me more about "God's grace"
Observe the remission and cured rate and tell us it does so without
God's grace?
You miss the point.
You snipped the point:
GooGoo AI Overview
"Physician and author Dr. Larry Dossey championed the integration of spirituality and medicine, arguing that compassionate, non-local
prayer can positively influence cancer and other illnesses. He
advocated that prayer is not a substitute for orthodox medical
treatment, but a powerful, evidence-supported complement to it.Dr.
Dossey's core perspectives on cancer and prayer include:Scientific
Basis: In his book Healing Words, Dossey reviewed over a hundred
controlled studies. He claimed that some experiments showed positive
impacts of intentional prayer on cancer cells, tumors in mice, and
human leukemic white blood cells.The "How-To" of Prayer: Dossey differentiated between "petitionary" prayer (asking for a specific,
rigid outcome, like the shrinking of a tumor) and "open-ended" prayer (aligning with a higher will, such as "may thy will be done"). He
argued the latter is more effective because it minimizes the anxiety
that a prayer might "fail".Compassion Over Quantity: He believed that
the efficacy of prayer does not rely on the number of people praying
or the specific words used, but rather the intensity, genuineness, and unconditional love behind the intention.Rejection of "Blame": Dossey
actively warned against the harmful idea that a cancer diagnosis is
the patientrCOs fault for not thinking "positively" enough or having spiritual shortcomings. He noted this approach causes unnecessary
guilt and does not align with true healing."
If God doesn't want children
to have cancer why do they?
God's will can be difficult to parse for mere humans.
That's why He left us a shop manual to work from.
These idiots want us to take everything in the New Testament literallyNicely cited.
(even though there is a valid explanation for the terms) all the while
insisting that we shouldn't take the Qu'ran literally when it demands
that Muslims kill Christians and Jews.
On 5/17/26 3:30 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 17, 2026 at 2:09:25rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a0a2e86$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/17/26 12:32 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:Your fact-free dismissal is dismissed as...being fact free.
On 5/16/26 7:43 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n6s7msFccu0U4@mid.individual.net:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not >>>>>>>>>> count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead, stole their sins, >>>>>>>> and if they donrCOt behave properly will send them to hell. How do >>>>>>>> you justify that?
It's because a woman took a banana from a tree in a story the man from >>>>>>> the dead told you before he arrived and you need to pray to him
because he is a grape.
Christianity: The belief that a
cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his
own father can make you live
forever if you eat his flesh and
telepathecally tell him you
accept him as your master, so he
can remove an evil force from your
soul that is present in humanity
because a rib-woman was convinced
by a talking snake to eat from a
magical tree - yep, makes perfect
sense.
Secularity:The belief that somehow we "evolved" as humans despite a
fossil record lacking in linearity and pockmarked by geologic and
climatic evidence of multiple extinctions - nearly all of which are
illustrated and recorded in the histories of human faith-based
communities as diverse as Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and multiple >>>>> "first nations" oral traditions and icons. In apostolic denial always of >>>>> massively anachronistic pictographs, petroglyphs and geoglyphs all
confirming basic religious narratives of a creator diety and associated >>>>> helpers with technologies that somehow disappeared leaving only
lithified cautionary monuments behind.
Your claims are not supported or accurate.
The fossil record is amazingly complete given the circumstances of how it was
formed.
That is a qualifier statement.
AI Overview
Earth's fossil record is estimated to preserve less than \(1\%\) of all
the species that have ever lived. Because specific conditions like rapid burial are required for fossilization, the record is heavily biased
toward marine organisms with hard shells and contains significant gaps throughout.
And we have a LOT more than that to back evolution... DNA, physical
structures, embryology, biogeography, direct observation, and more.
Add to that there is no other competing model that holds any water.
Catastrophism does.
Are we going to find out more about evolution and improve our understanding >> over time -- sure. But the basics: pretty much well established and
understood.
Not for humans, no.
AI Overview
"You are entirely correct. The scientific understanding of human
evolution is compelling but incomplete. Because we cannot directly
observe the deep past, researchers rely on a puzzle of fossils, DNA, and artifacts that leaves many questions unanswered.Several specific gaps
make proving human evolution an ongoing challenge:The Fossil Record: The fossil record for hominins is fragmented. Transitional species are often separated by vast amounts of time, meaning scientists are continuously debating which fossils belong to direct human ancestors versus
side-branches on the evolutionary tree.Rapid Cultural Evolution: Humans
adapt to environments using culture, technology, and learned behavior
far faster than biology changes. This means natural selection works differently for humans than for other animals, and many of our complex behaviors leave no physical fossils.Genetic Mysteries: While we share
roughly \(99.9\%\) of our DNA with one another and about \(98.8\%\) with chimpanzees, pinning down the exact, tiny genetic changes that led to
complex human traits (like advanced language and large brains) remains
an active, ongoing area of study. "
OK, next: the Bible speaking of the multiple executions... nope.
Strawman deflection noted and dismissed.
It talks of a
flood that is NOT supported by the evidence.
Dead wrong.
https://answersingenesis.org/the-flood/global/evidences-genesis-flood/?srsltid=AfmBOooRuFqGBkff8mfDQnFz5VKqU1XM913Kf6FqX9oIn2_6JdnJb9s4
"But a catastrophe as swift and wide-spreading as a global flood would
leave marks on the continents across the globe, even 4,500 years
laterrCoand that is exactly what we see today.
1. Marine Fossils High on Mountains
Fossils are one of the best evidences of a global flood, especially
where many fossils are found. For example, we donrCOt find marine
creatures, such as fish, clams, and corals, buried and fossilized on the
sea floor where they once lived. Instead, we find most of them buried in sedimentary rocks on the continents, even on high mountains. For that to happen, the ocean waters had to totally flood the continents. And thatrCOs exactly what the Bible describes during the global flood.
We find ammonite fossils (squids with coiled shells) in limestone
layers, high up in the Himalayas in Nepal, near the top of Mount
Everest. Of course, Mount Everest wasnrCOt there before the flood, so the ocean waters didnrCOt have to rise to over 29,000 feet (8,840 m) above current sea level to cover it. Instead, the sedimentary layers now
making up the Himalayas were first deposited on the continent during the flood. The layers buckled and uplifted at the end of the flood to form
the towering Himalayan mountains we see today.
Similarly, we find marine fossils in most rock layers exposed in the
Grand CanyonrCOs walls in Arizona. At over 2,950 feet (900 m) above sea level, the Redwall Limestone is one of the best examples of these rock layers. It commonly contains fossil brachiopods (clam-like organisms), corals, bryozoans (lace corals), crinoids (sea lilies), bivalves
(clams), gastropods (marine snails), trilobites (horseshoe crab-like animals), cephalopods (squid-like creatures), and even fish teeth.
These marine fossils are found haphazardly preserved in this limestone
bed. For example, though live crinoids have columnals (disks) stacked on
top of one another to make up their stems, in the limestone these disks
are mostly separated from one another. These marine creatures were catastrophically destroyed and buried in this lime sediment now high on
the continent.
2. Massive Fossil Graveyards Around the World
Countless billions of plant and animal fossils are found buried in
extensive graveyards around the world. For example, billions of straight-shelled, chambered nautiloids of all different sizes are found fossilized with other marine creatures (crinoids, corals, brachiopods, gastropods, and bryozoans) in a 7 foot- (2 m-) thick layer within the
Redwall Limestone of Grand Canyon. This fossil graveyard stretches for
180 miles (290 km) across northern Arizona and into southern Nevada,
covering an area of at least 10,500 square miles (30,000 km2).
To form such a vast fossil graveyard required 24 cubic miles (100 km3)
of lime sand and silt, flowing in a thick, soup-like slurry at more than
16 feet (5 m) per second (more than 11 mph [18 km/h]) to
catastrophically overwhelm and bury this huge, living population of nautiloids.
How could this have happened unless the ocean waters rose and rapidly
swept over the continents in the global, catastrophic flood?
In another fossil graveyard in Montceau-les-Mines, France, hundreds of thousands of marine creatures were buried with amphibians, spiders, scorpions, millipedes, insects, and reptiles.
These marine and land-dwelling creatures are found buried together on
the continent. How could this have happened unless the ocean waters rose
and rapidly swept over the continents in the global, catastrophic flood?
3. Exquisitely Preserved Fossils
During the flood, many creatures were buried and fossilized so quickly
that they were exquisitely preserved. Because many fish were buried
alive, the fine details of their fins and eye sockets have been
preserved. Even the compound lenses in many trilobite eyes are still available for detailed study.
Delicate species were also well preserved. Mawsonites spriggi is a
fossilized jellyfish that was found in a sandstone bed covering more
than 400 square miles (1,040 km2) of the South Australian outback.
Thousands of these jellyfish are impeccably preserved in this sandstone
bed. This is significant because soft-bodied creatures like jellyfish
that wash onto a beach today melt in the sun or are destroyed by
crashing waves. Based on this knowledge, the discoverer concluded that
all of these fossilized, soft-bodied marine creatures were buried in
less than a day."
What is interesting is looking atIow, there is significant flood (s) record across multiple societies, timeliness, and locations.
the flood stories and seeing how they are similar and different. From that you
can tell a lot about how populations spread:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/09/150917091401.htm
https://www.science.org/content/article/black-sea-flood-theory-put-test
There was a better one I read some time back... not finding it now. Goes into
how even before we had DNA evidence of population spread we could tell a lot >> from the myths, with a focus on the flood stories.
TY--
On 5/17/26 3:33 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 17, 2026 at 2:08:02rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a0a2e33$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/17/26 12:32 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
...
Yes it does.https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
This is grooming, straight up.
The link does not back that conclusion.
rCa
Nope.
Yes.
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
On 5/17/26 3:36 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 17, 2026 at 2:06:40rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a0a2de1$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/17/26 12:32 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:Practice is support.
On 5/17/26 6:35 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2026-05-16 7:19 p.m., zendejo wrote:Indeed.
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd. >>>>>>>
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican agenda >>>>>>>> of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb us," >>>>>>>> which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get Hell." >>>>>>>> Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to any >>>>>>>> current Republican company lines?
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not count?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate pleasure >>>>>>> in sex.
In Islam, women are not allowed to enjoy sex. They must know that their >>>>>> role is to produce children, nothing more. Additionally, while a man can >>>>>> go to Heaven by dying for Islam or a number of good works, women can >>>>>> only go to Heaven if their husbands were pleased with them... the same >>>>>> husbands who can divorce them merely by repeating the same sentence >>>>>> three times. Men get 72 virgins if they get to Heaven, but women merely >>>>>> get to hang out while their husband has sex with 72 virgins. If the >>>>>> women were single and somehow manage to get to Heaven, they get a
husband to serve.
Is there no more ridiculous religion?
None of that is supported.
What is claimed is not supported as mainstream practice.
So?
It remains too prevalent in those communities regardless.
You can find examples
of Christians, Jews, Muslims, atheists, or other groups doing wrong.
You're rationalizing to deflect.
Granted,
in general atheists tend to be more for equal rights,
Than whom?
Any citations for that?
it is not fair to say
Christians and Jews and Muslims cannot be good people, too.
Yes, so?
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits- to-grooming-your-kids/
On May 17, 2026 at 2:08:02aPM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a0a2e33$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/17/26 12:32 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
...
Yes it does.https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
This is grooming, straight up.
The link does not back that conclusion.
?
Nope. The piece hinges on a bait-and-switch: the academic article he quotes discusses imaginative play and gender exploration in educational settings, but
he labels this "grooming" ? a term that specifically means manipulating children for sexual abuse. Stretching the word to cover "ideas I find objectionable" doesn't broaden the definition, it empties it of meaning and trivializes real abuse in the process.
There is a place to debate age-appropriate content and consent in schools. Replacing those arguments with logical fallacies and word games is not about protecting the kids, it is about avoiding the conversation.
...
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a0a3b1a$0$18 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-17 4:47 p.m., zendejo wrote:will
On 5/17/26 12:29 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a09fe4c$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 7:57 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08f708$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 12:19 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
-a-a-a So we should all just accept our bodies as is?You conflate basic good container grooming with abridging God's >>>>>>>> design?
-a-a-a-a-a-a No more teeth straightening, no more hair plugs, >>>>>>>>> no more cleft palate repair, no more Spina Bifida
repair, no more lasik surgery?
-a-a-a-a-a-a "Your birth defect is God's design, live with it" >>>>>>>>>
-a-a-a-a-a-a Gads.
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Cleft palates are "God's design"
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Crooked teeth are "God's design"?
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Dwarfism is "God's design"?
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Spina Bifida is "God's design"?
Like GM, the Creator makes some models better than others.
-a-a-a-a-a A god who makes mistakes.
-a-a-a-a-a And you worship him?
-a-a-a-a-a Why?
A God who creates something as beautiful and grand as the Christ
always be venerated.
-a-a-a-a The same god who created Parkinsons
and Alzheimers and Cholera and Smallpox
and Polio and Leprosy and birth defects?
The same God who made from Adam's rib.
In God's world, there is no Alzheimer's, cholera, smallpox, polio,
leprosy and birth defects. However, you need to die to see God's world. Our world is ruled by Satan. John 12:31 "Now is the time for judgment
on
this world; now the prince of this world will be driven out."
I love that narrative. "God is all wise,
all powerful, and loves mankind but cannot
stop Satan from running the world"
-a-a-a-a Pardon us if we fail to find that
worthy of worship.
Pardon us if we find your strident, angry and deceitful faggotry to be
an abomination.
Faggots are possessed by demons. That's part of why they get such joy
from attacking Christ.
That certainly explains all the Pedophile Priests.
Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <XnsB44F8560F4014629555@185.151.15.190>,
noemail@aol.com says...
We have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a09cacd$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
"Christians are killing women in this country. And the poor. And
disabled. And the poor. Look at the "Bible Belt" where all of these
things and so much more are worse. We are in end-stage capitalized
fueled by right wing extremist Christians. Muslims do not do nearly
the harm." - Sodomite Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser
Actually he is right.
The Bible Belt IS the murder belt
and the teen pregnancy belt and the
pornography belt and the divorce belt
and the obesity belt and the smoking
belt and the poverty belt and the low
life expectancy belt and the infant
mortality belt.
But hey, at least they attend
church more than anyone else, right?
They just have a lot more issues in the Bible Belt.
On 5/15/2026 7:26 PM, phoenix wrote:
Do you agree that Joel is a bigot who is prejudiced against people with college and graduate degrees? Isn't he promoting the Musk grifter idea that people who drop out of high school can make it just as big as everybody else? Isn't he saying that NASA needs more high school
dropouts in order to sabotage NASA?
Uh, no, my parents both had post-grad degrees, and so does my brother.
I was succeeding in college, myself, prior to dropping out.
Isn't Joel a bigot against people wearing glasses? A minority so marginalized they are not even ever mentioned when people talk about the handicapped the black the trans etc.? They don't even consider people wearing glasses, and Joel is a bigot against them.
I have glasses, I wear them primarily for driving, but also at church to read the hymn lyrics/notes on the screen.
Isn't Joel a troll as they said, he is manifesting some psychosocial
guru status that he can see through the crap because his high school dropout background endowed him in the psylocibin arts? How do you feel empowering a bigot like him? He says that true genius is an art
possessed only by the highly charismatic, the guys with two tones of coloring in their hair who are so handsome even gentlemen feel attracted to them until they found out they are total abusers like Joel?
Utter word salad, next.
These are some specific examples because I don't feel like typing intelligently right now. Joel has me in a mood. I invited him here to speak and then he went into his retard spiel.
So you have absolutely nothing, got it.
On 5/16/2026 1:42 PM, zendejo wrote:
She [Joel's trans GF] isn't a guy.
"She" most certainly came out of the womb as one.
This would be why they say "assigned male at birth", at that stage
of development there's nothing to indicate they're transgender.
A state of surgical and hormonal drugs alteration from "as born".
She was born trans,
Wrong.
Infants are not aware of nor capable of articulating their gender.
It's a developmental trait - but not visible to today's technology at
birth. At least not with anything routinely done.
but no one can tell that about an infant.a She knew she was as a young
child.
How young?
Five years.
Agreed.She hasn't taken the hormones.a She's gorgeous while being
basically all natural.
Most men can't push out large breasts like that, implants then?
Yes, collagen.a They look remarkably real, though.
But fake is fake.
Trans fake is still fake.
Her breasts are fake, her gender identity isn't fake.
It is what sHe deems it to be, but likely enhanced by indoctrination and
a feminized food supply.
She's developmentally a female, her genitals are male, her DNA is male,
but it's clear seeing her and listening to her that she's a woman. I
don't really care if phobes reject it, or call me a "sodomite",
"faggot", etc.
On 5/16/2026 1:42 PM, zendejo wrote:
Just stay away from children.Marvelous, wishing you all the best, both of you guys.Honestly if you back track the postings there is credibility of the >>>>> principals, if it's an act, so be it.
I know it sounds weird for Usenet, people like me are supposed to be >>>> younger Gen Z whatever people, but in fact there are people older
than I am who are coming out as trans.a I liked what I saw with
trans women so I pursued meeting one.
Thank you.
I'm not attracted to children nor do I have to talk to them about non-age-appropriate things. Telling them my GF is trans is
age-appropriate, telling them she fucks me up the ass is not.
On 5/16/2026 1:52 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/16/26 8:43 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <rBZNR.2735$6M1.1535@fx23.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 5/15/2026 5:01 PM, zendejo wrote:
Marvelous, wishing you all the best, both of you guys.Honestly if you back track the postings there is credibility of the >>>>>> principals, if it's an act, so be it.
I know it sounds weird for Usenet, people like me are supposed to be >>>>> younger Gen Z whatever people, but in fact there are people older than >>>>> I am who are coming out as trans.a I liked what I saw with trans women >>>>> so I pursued meeting one.
Thank you.
So both of you are guys. You admitted it.
At long last.
"You guys" is not using "guy" in a gender-specific way, this goes to
show why Skeeter's lame ass is killfiled in my newsreader.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a0a0588$0$24 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/17/26 7:27 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
How is cutting off your own dick and sterilizing yourself equivalent
to straightening your teeth?
Take that up with the "Live with the
body God made for you" crowd.
Tooth care is not equivalent to genital mutilation.
But circumcision is.
Opps.
What does God say about THAT?
On 5/17/2026 9:33 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a0a0588$0$24 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/17/26 7:27 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
How is cutting off your own dick and sterilizing yourself equivalent >>>> to straightening your teeth?
Take that up with the "Live with the
body God made for you" crowd.
Tooth care is not equivalent to genital mutilation.
But circumcision is.
Opps.
What does God say about THAT?
I like being circumcised, and I'm totally fine with my parents having
had it done to me as a baby - and yet, if I were to become a parent of a male child, I couldn't allow it to be done before they were old enough
to choose for themselves. Weird thing.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a0a0688$0$25 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/17/26 7:38 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:"sexual
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in news:6a09b464$0$19
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 2026-05-16 3:00 p.m., Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa4f$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
AI Overview
The Bible addresses sexual deviance through the umbrella term
oneencompassesimmorality" (translated from the Greek word porneia). This
all sexual acts outside of God's design for monogamous,
The Bible?
Monogamy?
What?
In Genesis 4:19 Lamech took two wives for himself.
The name of the first was Adah, and the name of
the second was Zillah.
Context: It was one of the degenerate race of Cain who first
transgressed that original law of marriage, that two only should be
Testament,flesh.
In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of
women without any limits to how many he can marry.
In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David
had six wives and numerous concubines.
In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300
concubines.
In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had
18 wives and 60 concubines.
In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he
loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."
In Deuteronomy 25:5 if a woman's husband dies, and she
didn't have any kids from him, then she must marry his
brother regardless whether he had a wife or not. '''
Interestingly, every one of your examples comes from the Old
none from the New.
If the Old Testament doesn't
matter why is it the Bible? Even
Jesus talked about Adam and Noah
and Moses.
It is an historical record of great import as well as a chronicle of creation, duh.
But not Revealed Truth?
Are you not aware that Christianity is based on the
latter?
Funny that Christians are the
ones quoting Leviticus to justify
their homophobia and plastering
the Ten Commandments in schools.
Funny that any attempt to support the 10 commandments (which underlay
our own legal system) is so unwelcome by secular demons.
How many of the Ten Commandments
"underlay our legal system"?
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in news:n6uhg2FngdsU4 @mid.individual.net:
Mitchell Holman wrote:This
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a0a001a$0$21
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 8:28 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a08faa3$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 1:00 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa4f$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 7:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
And.....there is it.
The "God's law" angle.
I knew it was coming.
Tell us what God said about trans people.
Tell us what Jesus said about trans people.
AI Overview
The Bible addresses sexual deviance through the umbrella term
"sexual immorality" (translated from the Greek word porneia).
monogamous,encompasses all sexual acts outside of God's design for
eye?He did a pretty good job explaining your Luke quote, didn't he. He said hate was the absence of love or the lesser love. Why didn't you acknowledge his good wisdom there or do you have a mote in your owntheYes, the New Testament firmly supports and establishes monogamy as
The Bible?
Monogamy?
What?
In Genesis 4:19 Lamech took two wives for himself.
The name of the first was Adah, and the name of
the second was Zillah.
In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of
women without any limits to how many he can marry.
In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David
had six wives and numerous concubines.
In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300
concubines.
In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had
18 wives and 60 concubines.
In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he
loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."
In Deuteronomy 25:5 if a woman's husband dies, and she
didn't have any kids from him, then she must marry his
brother regardless whether he had a wife or not. '''
normative ideal for marriage.
1) Where does it state that?
Do you ever read for comprehension?
"GooGoo AI Overview
You said the New Testament.
Not an AI overview.
You can do better than that.
anthology?
2) So the Old Testament doesn't matter?
Do the first few chapters always define the conclusions of an
Either the Bible is God's Revealed Truth
or it is not.
Which is it?
Bible passages do not need to be "explained"
They say what they say.
If the apologists want to undo the obvious
with excuses that is their busisness.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a0a2f91$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/17/26 12:38 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a0a009f$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 8:30 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa88$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 8:08 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Special entitlements.
Herd mentality.
Tribalism.
And others.
Those are right wing bot terms.
Says a left wing homo bot denying God's grace.
Walk thru a pediatric cancer ward
and tell me more about "God's grace"
Observe the remission and cured rate and tell us it does so without
God's grace?
You miss the point.
You snipped the point:
GooGoo AI Overview
If you need AI to make your
point it cannot be much of a point.
"Physician and author Dr. Larry Dossey championed the integration of spirituality and medicine, arguing that compassionate, non-local
prayer can positively influence cancer and other illnesses. He
advocated that prayer is not a substitute for orthodox medical
treatment, but a powerful, evidence-supported complement to it.Dr.
Dossey's core perspectives on cancer and prayer include:Scientific
Basis: In his book Healing Words, Dossey reviewed over a hundred
controlled studies. He claimed that some experiments showed positive impacts of intentional prayer on cancer cells, tumors in mice, and
human leukemic white blood cells.The "How-To" of Prayer: Dossey differentiated between "petitionary" prayer (asking for a specific,
rigid outcome, like the shrinking of a tumor) and "open-ended" prayer (aligning with a higher will, such as "may thy will be done"). He
argued the latter is more effective because it minimizes the anxiety
that a prayer might "fail".Compassion Over Quantity: He believed that
the efficacy of prayer does not rely on the number of people praying
or the specific words used, but rather the intensity, genuineness, and unconditional love behind the intention.Rejection of "Blame": Dossey actively warned against the harmful idea that a cancer diagnosis is
the patientrn?s fault for not thinking "positively" enough or having spiritual shortcomings. He noted this approach causes unnecessary
guilt and does not align with true healing."
If God doesn't want children
to have cancer why do they?
God's will can be difficult to parse for mere humans.
If you cannot explain "God's will"
just say so, we will understand.
That's why He left us a shop manual to work from.
What "shop manual"?
In article <XnsB44FD0476FF5B629555@185.151.15.190>,
noemail@aol.com says...
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a0a0588$0$24
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/17/26 7:27 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
How is cutting off your own dick and sterilizing yourself equivalent >>>>> to straightening your teeth?
Take that up with the "Live with the
body God made for you" crowd.
Tooth care is not equivalent to genital mutilation.
But circumcision is.
Opps.
What does God say about THAT?
That isn't trying to turn a male into a female. Stupid
argument.
In article <O8uOR.2274576$4wI6.1492817@fx24.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 5/17/2026 9:33 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a0a0588$0$24
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/17/26 7:27 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
How is cutting off your own dick and sterilizing yourself equivalent >>>>>> to straightening your teeth?
Take that up with the "Live with the
body God made for you" crowd.
Tooth care is not equivalent to genital mutilation.
But circumcision is.
Opps.
What does God say about THAT?
I like being circumcised, and I'm totally fine with my parents having
had it done to me as a baby - and yet, if I were to become a parent of a
male child, I couldn't allow it to be done before they were old enough
to choose for themselves. Weird thing.
So you're a hypocrite.
On 5/15/2026 7:26 PM, phoenix wrote:
Do you agree that Joel is a bigot who is prejudiced against people
with college and graduate degrees? Isn't he promoting the Musk grifter
idea that people who drop out of high school can make it just as big
as everybody else? Isn't he saying that NASA needs more high school
dropouts in order to sabotage NASA?
Uh, no, my parents both had post-grad degrees, and so does my brother. I
was succeeding in college, myself, prior to dropping out.
Isn't Joel a bigot against people wearing glasses? A minority so
marginalized they are not even ever mentioned when people talk about
the handicapped the black the trans etc.? They don't even consider
people wearing glasses, and Joel is a bigot against them.
I have glasses, I wear them primarily for driving, but also at church to read the hymn lyrics/notes on the screen.
Isn't Joel a troll as they said, he is manifesting some psychosocial
guru status that he can see through the crap because his high school
dropout background endowed him in the psylocibin arts? How do you feel
empowering a bigot like him? He says that true genius is an art
possessed only by the highly charismatic, the guys with two tones of
coloring in their hair who are so handsome even gentlemen feel
attracted to them until they found out they are total abusers like Joel?
Utter word salad, next.
guru status that he can see through the crap because his high school
dropout background endowed him in the psylocibin arts?
empowering a bigot like him?
possessed only by the highly charismatic, the guys with two tones of
coloring in their hair who are so handsome even gentlemen feel
attracted to them until they found out they are total abusers like Joel?
In article <6a0a413c$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <XnsB44F8560F4014629555@185.151.15.190>,
noemail@aol.com says...
We have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a09cacd$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
"Christians are killing women in this country. And the poor. And
disabled. And the poor. Look at the "Bible Belt" where all of these
things and so much more are worse. We are in end-stage capitalized
fueled by right wing extremist Christians. Muslims do not do nearly
the harm." - Sodomite Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser
Actually he is right.
The Bible Belt IS the murder belt
and the teen pregnancy belt and the
pornography belt and the divorce belt
and the obesity belt and the smoking
belt and the poverty belt and the low
life expectancy belt and the infant
mortality belt.
But hey, at least they attend
church more than anyone else, right?
They just have a lot more issues in the Bible Belt.
More in Washington DC.
In article <6a0a3435$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On May 17, 2026 at 2:08:02 PM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a0a2e33$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/17/26 12:32 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
...
Yes it does.https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
This is grooming, straight up.
The link does not back that conclusion.
?
Nope. The piece hinges on a bait-and-switch: the academic article he quotes >> discusses imaginative play and gender exploration in educational settings, but
he labels this "grooming" ? a term that specifically means manipulating
children for sexual abuse. Stretching the word to cover "ideas I find
objectionable" doesn't broaden the definition, it empties it of meaning and >> trivializes real abuse in the process.
You mean like the words ?pedophile? and "Nazi" and
"racist"?
--
There is a place to debate age-appropriate content and consent in schools. >> Replacing those arguments with logical fallacies and word games is not about >> protecting the kids, it is about avoiding the conversation.
...
On May 18, 2026 at 3:07:07rC>AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.447492ba7957619398b7fa@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a0a413c$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <XnsB44F8560F4014629555@185.151.15.190>,
noemail@aol.com says...
We have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a09cacd$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
"Christians are killing women in this country. And the poor. And
disabled. And the poor. Look at the "Bible Belt" where all of these >>>>>> things and so much more are worse. We are in end-stage capitalized >>>>>> fueled by right wing extremist Christians. Muslims do not do nearly >>>>>> the harm." - Sodomite Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser
Actually he is right.
The Bible Belt IS the murder belt
and the teen pregnancy belt and the
pornography belt and the divorce belt
and the obesity belt and the smoking
belt and the poverty belt and the low
life expectancy belt and the infant
mortality belt.
But hey, at least they attend
church more than anyone else, right?
They just have a lot more issues in the Bible Belt.
More in Washington DC.
I do not know the obesity and smoking rates and the like for DC. Have any sources to back that?
On May 18, 2026 at 3:07:07rC>AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.447492ba7957619398b7fa@usnews.blocknews.net>:these
In article <6a0a413c$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <XnsB44F8560F4014629555@185.151.15.190>,
noemail@aol.com says...
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a09cacd$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
"Christians are killing women in this country. And the poor. And
disabled. And the poor. Look at the "Bible Belt" where all of
nearlythings and so much more are worse. We are in end-stage capitalized >>>>>> fueled by right wing extremist Christians. Muslims do not do
anyWe have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.the harm." - Sodomite Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser
Actually he is right.
The Bible Belt IS the murder belt
and the teen pregnancy belt and the
pornography belt and the divorce belt
and the obesity belt and the smoking
belt and the poverty belt and the low
life expectancy belt and the infant
mortality belt.
But hey, at least they attend
church more than anyone else, right?
They just have a lot more issues in the Bible Belt.
More in Washington DC.
I do not know the obesity and smoking rates and the like for DC. Have
sources to back that?
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:6a0b3339$0$19 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On May 18, 2026 at 3:07:07|ore4->AM MST, "Skeeter" wrotethese
<MPG.447492ba7957619398b7fa@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6a0a413c$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <XnsB44F8560F4014629555@185.151.15.190>,
noemail@aol.com says...
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a09cacd$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
"Christians are killing women in this country. And the poor. And >>>>>>> disabled. And the poor. Look at the "Bible Belt" where all of
nearlythings and so much more are worse. We are in end-stage capitalized >>>>>>> fueled by right wing extremist Christians. Muslims do not do
anyWe have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.the harm." - Sodomite Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser
Actually he is right.
The Bible Belt IS the murder belt
and the teen pregnancy belt and the
pornography belt and the divorce belt
and the obesity belt and the smoking
belt and the poverty belt and the low
life expectancy belt and the infant
mortality belt.
But hey, at least they attend
church more than anyone else, right?
They just have a lot more issues in the Bible Belt.
More in Washington DC.
I do not know the obesity and smoking rates and the like for DC. Have
sources to back that?
Skeeter doesn't post proof,
he only demands it.
some stupid leftist wrote:
But circumcision is.
Opps.
What does God say about THAT?
In article <XnsB44F8560F4014629555@185.151.15.190>,
noemail@aol.com says...
We have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a09cacd$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
"Christians are killing women in this country. And the poor. And
disabled. And the poor. Look at the "Bible Belt" where all of these
things and so much more are worse. We are in end-stage capitalized
fueled by right wing extremist Christians. Muslims do not do nearly
the harm." - Sodomite Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser
Actually he is right.
The Bible Belt IS the murder belt
and the teen pregnancy belt and the
pornography belt and the divorce belt
and the obesity belt and the smoking
belt and the poverty belt and the low
life expectancy belt and the infant
mortality belt.
But hey, at least they attend
church more than anyone else, right?
Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <XnsB44F8560F4014629555@185.151.15.190>,
noemail@aol.com says...
We have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a09cacd$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
"Christians are killing women in this country. And the poor. And
disabled. And the poor. Look at the "Bible Belt" where all of these
things and so much more are worse. We are in end-stage capitalized
fueled by right wing extremist Christians. Muslims do not do nearly
the harm." - Sodomite Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser
Actually he is right.
The Bible Belt IS the murder belt
and the teen pregnancy belt and the
pornography belt and the divorce belt
and the obesity belt and the smoking
belt and the poverty belt and the low
life expectancy belt and the infant
mortality belt.
But hey, at least they attend
church more than anyone else, right?
They just have a lot more issues in the Bible Belt.
On 5/16/2026 1:42 PM, zendejo wrote:
She [Joel's trans GF] isn't a guy.
"She" most certainly came out of the womb as one.
This would be why they say "assigned male at birth", at that stage
of development there's nothing to indicate they're transgender.
A state of surgical and hormonal drugs alteration from "as born".
She was born trans,
Wrong.
Infants are not aware of nor capable of articulating their gender.
It's a developmental trait - but not visible to today's technology at birth.-a At least not with anything routinely done.
but no one can tell that about an infant.-a She knew she was as a
young child.
How young?
Five years.
Agreed.She hasn't taken the hormones.-a She's gorgeous while being
basically all natural.
Most men can't push out large breasts like that, implants then?
Yes, collagen.-a They look remarkably real, though.
But fake is fake.
Trans fake is still fake.
Her breasts are fake, her gender identity isn't fake.
It is what sHe deems it to be, but likely enhanced by indoctrination
and a feminized food supply.
She's developmentally a female, her genitals are male, her DNA is male,
but it's clear seeing her and listening to her that she's a woman.-a I
don't really care if phobes reject it, or call me a "sodomite",
"faggot", etc.
On 5/16/2026 1:42 PM, zendejo wrote:
Just stay away from children.Marvelous, wishing you all the best, both of you guys.Honestly if you back track the postings there is credibility of
the principals, if it's an act, so be it.
I know it sounds weird for Usenet, people like me are supposed to
be younger Gen Z whatever people, but in fact there are people
older than I am who are coming out as trans.-a I liked what I saw
with trans women so I pursued meeting one.
Thank you.
I'm not attracted to children nor do I have to talk to them about non- age-appropriate things.-a Telling them my GF is trans is age-appropriate, telling them she fucks me up the ass is not.
On 5/16/2026 1:52 PM, zendejo wrote:
On 5/16/26 8:43 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <rBZNR.2735$6M1.1535@fx23.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 5/15/2026 5:01 PM, zendejo wrote:
Marvelous, wishing you all the best, both of you guys.Honestly if you back track the postings there is credibility of the >>>>>>> principals, if it's an act, so be it.
I know it sounds weird for Usenet, people like me are supposed to be >>>>>> younger Gen Z whatever people, but in fact there are people older >>>>>> than
I am who are coming out as trans.-a I liked what I saw with trans >>>>>> women
so I pursued meeting one.
Thank you.
So both of you are guys. You admitted it.
At long last.
"You guys" is not using "guy" in a gender-specific way,
this goes to
show why Skeeter's lame ass is killfiled in my newsreader.
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a0a0588$0$24 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/17/26 7:27 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
How is cutting off your own dick and sterilizing yourself equivalent
to straightening your teeth?
Take that up with the "Live with the
body God made for you" crowd.
Tooth care is not equivalent to genital mutilation.
But circumcision is.
Opps.
What does God say about THAT?
Funny that any attempt to support the 10 commandments (which underlay
our own legal system) is so unwelcome by secular demons.
How many of the Ten Commandments
"underlay our legal system"?
Bible passages do not need to be "explained"
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a0a2f91$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/17/26 12:38 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a0a009f$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 8:30 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa88$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 8:08 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Special entitlements.
Herd mentality.
Tribalism.
And others.
Those are right wing bot terms.
Says a left wing homo bot denying God's grace.
Walk thru a pediatric cancer ward
and tell me more about "God's grace"
Observe the remission and cured rate and tell us it does so without
God's grace?
You miss the point.
You snipped the point:
GooGoo AI Overview
If you need AI to make your
point it cannot be much of a point.
"Physician and author Dr. Larry Dossey championed the integration of
spirituality and medicine, arguing that compassionate, non-local
prayer can positively influence cancer and other illnesses. He
advocated that prayer is not a substitute for orthodox medical
treatment, but a powerful, evidence-supported complement to it.Dr.
Dossey's core perspectives on cancer and prayer include:Scientific
Basis: In his book Healing Words, Dossey reviewed over a hundred
controlled studies. He claimed that some experiments showed positive
impacts of intentional prayer on cancer cells, tumors in mice, and
human leukemic white blood cells.The "How-To" of Prayer: Dossey
differentiated between "petitionary" prayer (asking for a specific,
rigid outcome, like the shrinking of a tumor) and "open-ended" prayer
(aligning with a higher will, such as "may thy will be done"). He
argued the latter is more effective because it minimizes the anxiety
that a prayer might "fail".Compassion Over Quantity: He believed that
the efficacy of prayer does not rely on the number of people praying
or the specific words used, but rather the intensity, genuineness, and
unconditional love behind the intention.Rejection of "Blame": Dossey
actively warned against the harmful idea that a cancer diagnosis is
the patientrCOs fault for not thinking "positively" enough or having
spiritual shortcomings. He noted this approach causes unnecessary
guilt and does not align with true healing."
If God doesn't want children
to have cancer why do they?
God's will can be difficult to parse for mere humans.
If you cannot explain "God's will"
just say so, we will understand.
That's why He left us a shop manual to work from.
What "shop manual"?
On May 17, 2026 at 2:22:45rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a0a31a5$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
These idiots want us to take everything in the New Testament literallyNicely cited.
(even though there is a valid explanation for the terms) all the while
insisting that we shouldn't take the Qu'ran literally when it demands
that Muslims kill Christians and Jews.
But not accurate at all.
The Quran explicitly allows Muslim men to marry Jewish and Christian women and
permits eating their food (Quran 5:5). That would make little sense if all Jews and Christians were meant to be killed.
"There shall be no compulsion in religion." (2:256)
"God does not forbid you from being kind and just to those who do not fight you because of religion." (60:8)
There are WARTIME instructions where enemies are to be killed (go figure, that
is what war is).
Both the Quran and the Bible teach both peace and violence, and both have tons
of internal contradictions.
On May 17, 2026 at 2:45:11rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a0a36e8$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/17/26 3:30 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 17, 2026 at 2:09:25rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a0a2e86$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/17/26 12:32 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:Your fact-free dismissal is dismissed as...being fact free.
On 5/16/26 7:43 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n6s7msFccu0U4@mid.individual.net:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not >>>>>>>>>>> count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead, stole their sins, >>>>>>>>> and if they donrCOt behave properly will send them to hell. How do >>>>>>>>> you justify that?
It's because a woman took a banana from a tree in a story the man from >>>>>>>> the dead told you before he arrived and you need to pray to him >>>>>>>> because he is a grape.
Christianity: The belief that a
cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his
own father can make you live
forever if you eat his flesh and
telepathecally tell him you
accept him as your master, so he
can remove an evil force from your
soul that is present in humanity
because a rib-woman was convinced
by a talking snake to eat from a
magical tree - yep, makes perfect
sense.
Secularity:The belief that somehow we "evolved" as humans despite a >>>>>> fossil record lacking in linearity and pockmarked by geologic and
climatic evidence of multiple extinctions - nearly all of which are >>>>>> illustrated and recorded in the histories of human faith-based
communities as diverse as Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and multiple >>>>>> "first nations" oral traditions and icons. In apostolic denial always of >>>>>> massively anachronistic pictographs, petroglyphs and geoglyphs all >>>>>> confirming basic religious narratives of a creator diety and associated >>>>>> helpers with technologies that somehow disappeared leaving only
lithified cautionary monuments behind.
Your claims are not supported or accurate.
The fossil record is amazingly complete given the circumstances of how it was
formed.
That is a qualifier statement.
AI Overview
Earth's fossil record is estimated to preserve less than \(1\%\) of all
the species that have ever lived. Because specific conditions like rapid
burial are required for fossilization, the record is heavily biased
toward marine organisms with hard shells and contains significant gaps
throughout.
Fair.
And we have a LOT more than that to back evolution... DNA, physical
structures, embryology, biogeography, direct observation, and more.
Add to that there is no other competing model that holds any water.
Catastrophism does.
Pure catastrophism does not explain erosion, sediment buildup, mountain formation, glaciers, etc.
The fossil record and radiometric dating also
strongly support deep time and gradual biological succession.
There are real
catastrophes like asteroid impacts and mass extinctions rCo- just not as the sole explanation for Earth's history.
Are we going to find out more about evolution and improve our understanding >>> over time -- sure. But the basics: pretty much well established and
understood.
Not for humans, no.
The evidence / science shows it applies to humans as well.
AI Overview
"You are entirely correct. The scientific understanding of human
evolution is compelling but incomplete. Because we cannot directly
observe the deep past, researchers rely on a puzzle of fossils, DNA, and
artifacts that leaves many questions unanswered.Several specific gaps
make proving human evolution an ongoing challenge:The Fossil Record: The
fossil record for hominins is fragmented. Transitional species are often
separated by vast amounts of time, meaning scientists are continuously
debating which fossils belong to direct human ancestors versus
side-branches on the evolutionary tree.Rapid Cultural Evolution: Humans
adapt to environments using culture, technology, and learned behavior
far faster than biology changes. This means natural selection works
differently for humans than for other animals, and many of our complex
behaviors leave no physical fossils.Genetic Mysteries: While we share
roughly \(99.9\%\) of our DNA with one another and about \(98.8\%\) with
chimpanzees, pinning down the exact, tiny genetic changes that led to
complex human traits (like advanced language and large brains) remains
an active, ongoing area of study. "
Human evolution fits what we find / see. Fossils show a clear progression of human-like species over millions of years. Our DNA is nearly identical to chimps, and we share ancient genetic "scars" with other apes that can only be explained by a common ancestor. Our own bodies carry leftover traces of our evolutionary past rCo- a tailbone, vestigial muscles, embryonic features that briefly appear and disappear, nerves that go through "odd" paths, etc. And our
archaeological record shows a steady march of increasing sophistication in tools and behavior. Multiple paths lead to the same conclusion: we evolved. You are right that no single piece of evidence is perfect (when talking far into prehistory how could it be), but when fossils, genetics, anatomy, and archaeology all independently arrive at the same answer, that's about as solid
as science gets.
OK, next: the Bible speaking of the multiple executions... nope.
Strawman deflection noted and dismissed.
Should be multiple EXTINCTIONS. My error.
It talks of a
flood that is NOT supported by the evidence.
Dead wrong.
https://answersingenesis.org/the-flood/global/evidences-genesis-flood/?srsltid=AfmBOooRuFqGBkff8mfDQnFz5VKqU1XM913Kf6FqX9oIn2_6JdnJb9s4
"But a catastrophe as swift and wide-spreading as a global flood would
leave marks on the continents across the globe, even 4,500 years
laterrCoand that is exactly what we see today.
1. Marine Fossils High on Mountains
Fossils are one of the best evidences of a global flood, especially
where many fossils are found. For example, we donrCOt find marine
creatures, such as fish, clams, and corals, buried and fossilized on the
sea floor where they once lived. Instead, we find most of them buried in
sedimentary rocks on the continents, even on high mountains. For that to
happen, the ocean waters had to totally flood the continents. And thatrCOs >> exactly what the Bible describes during the global flood.
We find ammonite fossils (squids with coiled shells) in limestone
layers, high up in the Himalayas in Nepal, near the top of Mount
Everest. Of course, Mount Everest wasnrCOt there before the flood, so the
ocean waters didnrCOt have to rise to over 29,000 feet (8,840 m) above
current sea level to cover it. Instead, the sedimentary layers now
making up the Himalayas were first deposited on the continent during the
flood. The layers buckled and uplifted at the end of the flood to form
the towering Himalayan mountains we see today.
Similarly, we find marine fossils in most rock layers exposed in the
Grand CanyonrCOs walls in Arizona. At over 2,950 feet (900 m) above sea
level, the Redwall Limestone is one of the best examples of these rock
layers. It commonly contains fossil brachiopods (clam-like organisms),
corals, bryozoans (lace corals), crinoids (sea lilies), bivalves
(clams), gastropods (marine snails), trilobites (horseshoe crab-like
animals), cephalopods (squid-like creatures), and even fish teeth.
These marine fossils are found haphazardly preserved in this limestone
bed. For example, though live crinoids have columnals (disks) stacked on
top of one another to make up their stems, in the limestone these disks
are mostly separated from one another. These marine creatures were
catastrophically destroyed and buried in this lime sediment now high on
the continent.
2. Massive Fossil Graveyards Around the World
Countless billions of plant and animal fossils are found buried in
extensive graveyards around the world. For example, billions of
straight-shelled, chambered nautiloids of all different sizes are found
fossilized with other marine creatures (crinoids, corals, brachiopods,
gastropods, and bryozoans) in a 7 foot- (2 m-) thick layer within the
Redwall Limestone of Grand Canyon. This fossil graveyard stretches for
180 miles (290 km) across northern Arizona and into southern Nevada,
covering an area of at least 10,500 square miles (30,000 km2).
To form such a vast fossil graveyard required 24 cubic miles (100 km3)
of lime sand and silt, flowing in a thick, soup-like slurry at more than
16 feet (5 m) per second (more than 11 mph [18 km/h]) to
catastrophically overwhelm and bury this huge, living population of
nautiloids.
How could this have happened unless the ocean waters rose and rapidly
swept over the continents in the global, catastrophic flood?
In another fossil graveyard in Montceau-les-Mines, France, hundreds of
thousands of marine creatures were buried with amphibians, spiders,
scorpions, millipedes, insects, and reptiles.
These marine and land-dwelling creatures are found buried together on
the continent. How could this have happened unless the ocean waters rose
and rapidly swept over the continents in the global, catastrophic flood?
3. Exquisitely Preserved Fossils
During the flood, many creatures were buried and fossilized so quickly
that they were exquisitely preserved. Because many fish were buried
alive, the fine details of their fins and eye sockets have been
preserved. Even the compound lenses in many trilobite eyes are still
available for detailed study.
Delicate species were also well preserved. Mawsonites spriggi is a
fossilized jellyfish that was found in a sandstone bed covering more
than 400 square miles (1,040 km2) of the South Australian outback.
Thousands of these jellyfish are impeccably preserved in this sandstone
bed. This is significant because soft-bodied creatures like jellyfish
that wash onto a beach today melt in the sun or are destroyed by
crashing waves. Based on this knowledge, the discoverer concluded that
all of these fossilized, soft-bodied marine creatures were buried in
less than a day."
Without digging through all details, many of those observations are real but the conclusions are contrary to the evidence.
Marine fossils on mountains? That's plate tectonics rCo- tons of evidence to show that over millions of years plates move, mountains grow, etc. Fossil graveyards? Local catastrophes such as volcanic events and landslides do that.
A true global flood would actually *scramble* the fossil record rCo- yet we find
it perfectly layered, with trilobites, dinosaurs, and humans each in their own
distinct periods, never mixed together. This contradicts the idea of such a global flood.
A flood 4,500 years ago would show up clearly in ice cores, tree rings, and coral records -rCo continuous archives we have from that exact period. Nothing.
And Egyptian and Chinese civilizations were going about their business completely uninterrupted at that same time.
The article starts with a conclusion and then tried to push the evidence into it. That is very bad science.
What is interesting is looking atIow, there is significant flood (s) record across multiple societies,
the flood stories and seeing how they are similar and different. From that you
can tell a lot about how populations spread:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/09/150917091401.htm
https://www.science.org/content/article/black-sea-flood-theory-put-test
There was a better one I read some time back... not finding it now. Goes into
how even before we had DNA evidence of population spread we could tell a lot
from the myths, with a focus on the flood stories.
timeliness, and locations.
There are... but that does not support the conclusion of a global flood.
And
the fact there are huge cultures without such stories, and so much evidence that contradicts the idea, including the fossil record, we can be confident no
such flood happened.
On May 17, 2026 at 2:51:13rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a0a3852$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/17/26 3:33 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 17, 2026 at 2:08:02rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a0a2e33$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/17/26 12:32 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
...
Yes it does.https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
This is grooming, straight up.
The link does not back that conclusion.
rCa
Nope.
Yes.
Merely making a proclamation does not show evidence.
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-admits-to-grooming-your-kids/
Already discussed.
On 5/17/2026 5:51 PM, zendejo wrote:
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-
admits- to-grooming-your-kids/
Focus On The Family is gayer than anything the drag queens are
displaying to the kids, heh.-a You ever see James Dobson speak?-a The guy was a fag beyond belief, not homosexual, but definitely a flamer.
On May 17, 2026 at 2:56:41rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a0a3999$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/17/26 3:36 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 17, 2026 at 2:06:40rC>PM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a0a2de1$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/17/26 12:32 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:Practice is support.
On 5/17/26 6:35 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2026-05-16 7:19 p.m., zendejo wrote:Indeed.
On 5/16/26 3:58 PM, phoenix wrote:
Brock McNuggets wrote:You conflate American geopolitics and sexual mutilation, how odd. >>>>>>>>
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29rC>AM MST, "zendejo" wroteBecause that doesn't translate well to the current Republican agenda >>>>>>>>> of, "If you don't support the war the Iran will nuclear bomb us," >>>>>>>>> which aligns perfectly with, "if you don't pray you will get Hell." >>>>>>>>> Not giving fear to children? How would that be parallel to any >>>>>>>>> current Republican company lines?
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of >>>>>>>>>>> your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not count?
It's largely a Muslim trait done to their women to eliminate pleasure >>>>>>>> in sex.
In Islam, women are not allowed to enjoy sex. They must know that their >>>>>>> role is to produce children, nothing more. Additionally, while a man can
go to Heaven by dying for Islam or a number of good works, women can >>>>>>> only go to Heaven if their husbands were pleased with them... the same >>>>>>> husbands who can divorce them merely by repeating the same sentence >>>>>>> three times. Men get 72 virgins if they get to Heaven, but women merely >>>>>>> get to hang out while their husband has sex with 72 virgins. If the >>>>>>> women were single and somehow manage to get to Heaven, they get a >>>>>>> husband to serve.
Is there no more ridiculous religion?
None of that is supported.
What is claimed is not supported as mainstream practice.
So?
It remains too prevalent in those communities regardless.
Lots of things are too prevalent among religious people. And atheists for that
matter, though atheists often are rated as more moral (though lots of nuance here).
You can find examples
of Christians, Jews, Muslims, atheists, or other groups doing wrong.
You're rationalizing to deflect.
It is simply a fact. You are targeting one group with no basis.
Even if the
prevalence is higher in one group, that does not condemn the full group. Men commit murder more often than women. We cannot say all men are murderes. Gun owners and conservatives commit suicide more often than the general population... are we to say that is common among those groups as a whole?
Granted,
in general atheists tend to be more for equal rights,
Than whom?
Any citations for that?
Sure.
https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2025/02/26/religion-and-views-on-lgbtq-issues-and-abortion/
87% of religiously unaffiliated Americans (atheists, agnostics, "nones") say homosexuality should be accepted by society, compared to 55% of Christians who
favor same-sex marriage.
Support for same-sex marriage is notably higher among the religiously unaffiliated (88%) than among Christians overall. Most evangelical Protestants
(62%) continue to oppose it.
https://prri.org/research/lgbtq-rights-across-all-50-states-key-insights-2024-prri-american-values-atlas/
The religiously unaffiliated (71%) are among the most opposed to businesses refusing service to LGBTQ people on religious grounds rCo higher than most Christian groups.
https://religionnews.com/2024/03/12/poll-shows-slight-dip-in-us-support-for-lgbtq-rights-across-religious-groups/
PRRI found that support for Christian nationalism is negatively correlated with support for LGBTQ rights across all 50 states rCo as Christian nationalism
increases in a state, support for same-sex marriage, anti-discrimination laws,
and opposing religious refusals all decline. Religion News
I am sure I can find more.
it is not fair to say
Christians and Jews and Muslims cannot be good people, too.
Yes, so?
We should not condemn anyone based on group membership, unless that membership
is something like the KKK or Nazi Party.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:6a0b3339$0$19 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On May 18, 2026 at 3:07:07rn>AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.447492ba7957619398b7fa@usnews.blocknews.net>:
theseIn article <6a0a413c$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
Brock.McNuggets@gmail.com says...
Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <XnsB44F8560F4014629555@185.151.15.190>,
noemail@aol.com says...
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
news:6a09cacd$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
"Christians are killing women in this country. And the poor. And >>>>>> disabled. And the poor. Look at the "Bible Belt" where all of
nearlythings and so much more are worse. We are in end-stage capitalized >>>>>> fueled by right wing extremist Christians. Muslims do not do
We have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.the harm." - Sodomite Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser
Actually he is right.
The Bible Belt IS the murder belt
and the teen pregnancy belt and the
pornography belt and the divorce belt
and the obesity belt and the smoking
belt and the poverty belt and the low
life expectancy belt and the infant
mortality belt.
But hey, at least they attend
church more than anyone else, right?
They just have a lot more issues in the Bible Belt.
More in Washington DC.
I do not know the obesity and smoking rates and the like for DC. Haveany
sources to back that?
Skeeter doesn't post proof,
he only demands it.
"Yet you can't prove otherwise"
"Skeeter", when it comes to his own
claims. Mar 14 2023
https://tinyurl.com/bdzj2dhk
On 5/17/26 8:03 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a0a2f91$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/17/26 12:38 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in
news:6a0a009f$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/16/26 8:30 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote in news:6a08aa88$0$22
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On 5/15/26 8:08 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Special entitlements.
Herd mentality.
Tribalism.
And others.
Those are right wing bot terms.
Says a left wing homo bot denying God's grace.
Walk thru a pediatric cancer ward
and tell me more about "God's grace"
Observe the remission and cured rate and tell us it does so without
God's grace?
You miss the point.
You snipped the point:
GooGoo AI Overview
If you need AI to make your
point it cannot be much of a point.
"Physician and author Dr. Larry Dossey championed the integration of
spirituality and medicine, arguing that compassionate, non-local
prayer can positively influence cancer and other illnesses. He
advocated that prayer is not a substitute for orthodox medical
treatment, but a powerful, evidence-supported complement to it.Dr.
Dossey's core perspectives on cancer and prayer include:Scientific
Basis: In his book Healing Words, Dossey reviewed over a hundred
controlled studies. He claimed that some experiments showed positive
impacts of intentional prayer on cancer cells, tumors in mice, and
human leukemic white blood cells.The "How-To" of Prayer: Dossey
differentiated between "petitionary" prayer (asking for a specific,
rigid outcome, like the shrinking of a tumor) and "open-ended" prayer
(aligning with a higher will, such as "may thy will be done"). He
argued the latter is more effective because it minimizes the anxiety
that a prayer might "fail".Compassion Over Quantity: He believed that
the efficacy of prayer does not rely on the number of people praying
or the specific words used, but rather the intensity, genuineness, and
unconditional love behind the intention.Rejection of "Blame": Dossey
actively warned against the harmful idea that a cancer diagnosis is
the patient?s fault for not thinking "positively" enough or having
spiritual shortcomings. He noted this approach causes unnecessary
guilt and does not align with true healing."
If God doesn't want children
to have cancer why do they?
God's will can be difficult to parse for mere humans.
If you cannot explain "God's will"
just say so, we will understand.
Of course I can't in full, I'm not God!
That's why He left us a shop manual to work from.
What "shop manual"?
The Holy Bible.
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-
admits- to-grooming-your-kids/
Focus On The Family is gayer than anything the drag queens are
displaying to the kids, heh.-a You ever see James Dobson speak?-a The
guy was a fag beyond belief, not homosexual, but definitely a flamer.
Shoot the messenger noted again.
Toodles dear.
On 5/18/26 3:02 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 17, 2026 at 2:45:11aPM MST, "zendejo" wrote <6a0a36e8$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/17/26 3:30 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 17, 2026 at 2:09:25aPM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a0a2e86$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/17/26 12:32 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:Your fact-free dismissal is dismissed as...being fact free.
On 5/16/26 7:43 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n6s7msFccu0U4@mid.individual.net:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
zendejo <zd@no.here> wrote:
On 5/16/26 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 16, 2026 at 10:45:29aAM MST, "zendejo" wrote
<6a08ad39$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 5/16/26 7:15 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Explain Adam.
I don't need to explain childish fairy
tales
Then don't.
You'll have multiple more lifetimes in Hell to learn the error of
your ways.
You speak of corrupting kids... why would pushing that fear not >>>>>>>>>>> count?
There is no fear in normalcy and unmolested development.
Telling kids that some man came back from the dead, stole their sins,
and if they don?t behave properly will send them to hell. How do >>>>>>>>> you justify that?
It's because a woman took a banana from a tree in a story the man from
the dead told you before he arrived and you need to pray to him >>>>>>>> because he is a grape.
Christianity: The belief that a
cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his
own father can make you live
forever if you eat his flesh and
telepathecally tell him you
accept him as your master, so he
can remove an evil force from your
soul that is present in humanity
because a rib-woman was convinced
by a talking snake to eat from a
magical tree - yep, makes perfect
sense.
Secularity:The belief that somehow we "evolved" as humans despite a >>>>>> fossil record lacking in linearity and pockmarked by geologic and >>>>>> climatic evidence of multiple extinctions - nearly all of which are >>>>>> illustrated and recorded in the histories of human faith-based
communities as diverse as Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and multiple >>>>>> "first nations" oral traditions and icons. In apostolic denial always of
massively anachronistic pictographs, petroglyphs and geoglyphs all >>>>>> confirming basic religious narratives of a creator diety and associated
helpers with technologies that somehow disappeared leaving only
lithified cautionary monuments behind.
Your claims are not supported or accurate.
The fossil record is amazingly complete given the circumstances of how it was
formed.
That is a qualifier statement.
AI Overview
Earth's fossil record is estimated to preserve less than \(1\%\) of all
the species that have ever lived. Because specific conditions like rapid >> burial are required for fossilization, the record is heavily biased
toward marine organisms with hard shells and contains significant gaps
throughout.
Fair.
And we have a LOT more than that to back evolution... DNA, physical
structures, embryology, biogeography, direct observation, and more.
Add to that there is no other competing model that holds any water.
Catastrophism does.
Pure catastrophism does not explain erosion, sediment buildup, mountain formation, glaciers, etc.
Erosion: Grand Canyon, channeled scablands, the badlands - all from catastrophism.
The fossil record and radiometric dating also
strongly support deep time and gradual biological succession.
No they do not.
There are real
catastrophes like asteroid impacts and mass extinctions ?- just not as the sole explanation for Earth's history.
You have a lot to learn.
Are we going to find out more about evolution and improve our understanding
over time -- sure. But the basics: pretty much well established and
understood.
Not for humans, no.
The evidence / science shows it applies to humans as well.
AI Overview
"You are entirely correct. The scientific understanding of human
evolution is compelling but incomplete. Because we cannot directly
observe the deep past, researchers rely on a puzzle of fossils, DNA, and >> artifacts that leaves many questions unanswered.Several specific gaps
make proving human evolution an ongoing challenge:The Fossil Record: The >> fossil record for hominins is fragmented. Transitional species are often >> separated by vast amounts of time, meaning scientists are continuously
debating which fossils belong to direct human ancestors versus
side-branches on the evolutionary tree.Rapid Cultural Evolution: Humans
adapt to environments using culture, technology, and learned behavior
far faster than biology changes. This means natural selection works
differently for humans than for other animals, and many of our complex
behaviors leave no physical fossils.Genetic Mysteries: While we share
roughly \(99.9\%\) of our DNA with one another and about \(98.8\%\) with >> chimpanzees, pinning down the exact, tiny genetic changes that led to
complex human traits (like advanced language and large brains) remains
an active, ongoing area of study. "
Human evolution fits what we find / see. Fossils show a clear progression of
human-like species over millions of years. Our DNA is nearly identical to chimps, and we share ancient genetic "scars" with other apes that can only be
explained by a common ancestor. Our own bodies carry leftover traces of our evolutionary past ?- a tailbone, vestigial muscles, embryonic features that briefly appear and disappear, nerves that go through "odd" paths, etc. And our
archaeological record shows a steady march of increasing sophistication in tools and behavior. Multiple paths lead to the same conclusion: we evolved. You are right that no single piece of evidence is perfect (when talking far into prehistory how could it be), but when fossils, genetics, anatomy, and archaeology all independently arrive at the same answer, that's about as solid
as science gets.
OK, next: the Bible speaking of the multiple executions... nope.
Strawman deflection noted and dismissed.
Should be multiple EXTINCTIONS. My error.
It talks of a
flood that is NOT supported by the evidence.
Dead wrong.
https://answersingenesis.org/the-flood/global/evidences-genesis-flood/?srsltid=AfmBOooRuFqGBkff8mfDQnFz5VKqU1XM913Kf6FqX9oIn2_6JdnJb9s4
"But a catastrophe as swift and wide-spreading as a global flood would
leave marks on the continents across the globe, even 4,500 years
later?and that is exactly what we see today.
1. Marine Fossils High on Mountains
Fossils are one of the best evidences of a global flood, especially
where many fossils are found. For example, we don?t find marine
creatures, such as fish, clams, and corals, buried and fossilized on the >> sea floor where they once lived. Instead, we find most of them buried in >> sedimentary rocks on the continents, even on high mountains. For that to >> happen, the ocean waters had to totally flood the continents. And that?s >> exactly what the Bible describes during the global flood.
We find ammonite fossils (squids with coiled shells) in limestone
layers, high up in the Himalayas in Nepal, near the top of Mount
Everest. Of course, Mount Everest wasn?t there before the flood, so the
ocean waters didn?t have to rise to over 29,000 feet (8,840 m) above
current sea level to cover it. Instead, the sedimentary layers now
making up the Himalayas were first deposited on the continent during the >> flood. The layers buckled and uplifted at the end of the flood to form
the towering Himalayan mountains we see today.
Similarly, we find marine fossils in most rock layers exposed in the
Grand Canyon?s walls in Arizona. At over 2,950 feet (900 m) above sea
level, the Redwall Limestone is one of the best examples of these rock
layers. It commonly contains fossil brachiopods (clam-like organisms),
corals, bryozoans (lace corals), crinoids (sea lilies), bivalves
(clams), gastropods (marine snails), trilobites (horseshoe crab-like
animals), cephalopods (squid-like creatures), and even fish teeth.
These marine fossils are found haphazardly preserved in this limestone
bed. For example, though live crinoids have columnals (disks) stacked on >> top of one another to make up their stems, in the limestone these disks
are mostly separated from one another. These marine creatures were
catastrophically destroyed and buried in this lime sediment now high on
the continent.
2. Massive Fossil Graveyards Around the World
Countless billions of plant and animal fossils are found buried in
extensive graveyards around the world. For example, billions of
straight-shelled, chambered nautiloids of all different sizes are found
fossilized with other marine creatures (crinoids, corals, brachiopods,
gastropods, and bryozoans) in a 7 foot- (2 m-) thick layer within the
Redwall Limestone of Grand Canyon. This fossil graveyard stretches for
180 miles (290 km) across northern Arizona and into southern Nevada,
covering an area of at least 10,500 square miles (30,000 km2).
To form such a vast fossil graveyard required 24 cubic miles (100 km3)
of lime sand and silt, flowing in a thick, soup-like slurry at more than >> 16 feet (5 m) per second (more than 11 mph [18 km/h]) to
catastrophically overwhelm and bury this huge, living population of
nautiloids.
How could this have happened unless the ocean waters rose and rapidly
swept over the continents in the global, catastrophic flood?
In another fossil graveyard in Montceau-les-Mines, France, hundreds of
thousands of marine creatures were buried with amphibians, spiders,
scorpions, millipedes, insects, and reptiles.
These marine and land-dwelling creatures are found buried together on
the continent. How could this have happened unless the ocean waters rose >> and rapidly swept over the continents in the global, catastrophic flood? >>
3. Exquisitely Preserved Fossils
During the flood, many creatures were buried and fossilized so quickly
that they were exquisitely preserved. Because many fish were buried
alive, the fine details of their fins and eye sockets have been
preserved. Even the compound lenses in many trilobite eyes are still
available for detailed study.
Delicate species were also well preserved. Mawsonites spriggi is a
fossilized jellyfish that was found in a sandstone bed covering more
than 400 square miles (1,040 km2) of the South Australian outback.
Thousands of these jellyfish are impeccably preserved in this sandstone
bed. This is significant because soft-bodied creatures like jellyfish
that wash onto a beach today melt in the sun or are destroyed by
crashing waves. Based on this knowledge, the discoverer concluded that
all of these fossilized, soft-bodied marine creatures were buried in
less than a day."
Without digging through all details, many of those observations are real but
the conclusions are contrary to the evidence.
Marine fossils on mountains? That's plate tectonics ?- tons of evidence to show that over millions of years plates move, mountains grow, etc. Fossil graveyards? Local catastrophes such as volcanic events and landslides do that.
Has nothing to do with plate tectonics as aaprimary cause, it is
evidence of the Great Flood.
A true global flood would actually *scramble* the fossil record ?- yet we find
it perfectly layered, with trilobites, dinosaurs, and humans each in their own
distinct periods, never mixed together. This contradicts the idea of such a global flood.
No we find that as well as unconformities, missing fossil records, mud floods, etc.
A flood 4,500 years ago would show up clearly in ice cores, tree rings, and coral records -? continuous archives we have from that exact period. Nothing.
And Egyptian and Chinese civilizations were going about their business completely uninterrupted at that same time.
AI Overview
Geological, archaeological, and historical evidence does not support a single, globally encompassing flood 4,500 years ago (c. 2500 BCE).
However, this timeframe coincides with several major regional
mega-floods and rapid climate shifts that are widely considered the
likely historical origins of localized flood mythologies.1. The Black
Sea Deluge Hypothesis (c. 5000 BCE - 5600 BCE)While it occurred earlier
than 4,500 years ago, a prominent theory suggests that the melting
glaciers at the end of the last Ice Age caused a catastrophic breach of
the Bosporus Strait. This sent Mediterranean saltwater cascading into a freshwater Black Sea, rapidly flooding over 100,000 square kilometers
and displacing early agricultural populations. Oceanographers Bill Ryan
and Walter Pitman popularized the theory that the memory of this event passed down through oral traditions, becoming the basis for the
Mesopotamian and Biblical flood stories.2. The Great Flood of China (c.
1920 BCE)The foundational story of Chinese civilization?the legendary Emperor Yu taming a massive, generation-spanning deluge?was historically considered pure myth. In 2016, a scientific team published evidence in Science magazine proving that a devastating outburst flood actually
occurred on the Yellow River. A massive earthquake caused a landslide
that dammed the river at the Jishi Gorge. Months later, the landslide
dam burst, causing a catastrophic flood that devastated downstream communities.
The article starts with a conclusion and then tried to push the evidence into
it. That is very bad science.
Worse science is misrepresenting or denying catastrophism.
AI Overview
The "melted" steps are a famous feature of the western staircase in the Temple of Hathor at the Dendera Temple Complex in Egypt. Dating back to
the Ptolemaic period (circa 1st century BC), the limestone stairs have a soft, undulating, and almost liquefied appearance.
This:
//Despite conspiracy theories suggesting high-heat ancient technologies, archaeologists and geologists attribute this effect to long-term
weathering and natural erosion.//
Is global deceit.
What is interesting is looking atIow, there is significant flood (s) record across multiple societies,
the flood stories and seeing how they are similar and different. From that you
can tell a lot about how populations spread:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/09/150917091401.htm
https://www.science.org/content/article/black-sea-flood-theory-put-test >>>
There was a better one I read some time back... not finding it now. Goes into
how even before we had DNA evidence of population spread we could tell a lot
from the myths, with a focus on the flood stories.
timeliness, and locations.
There are... but that does not support the conclusion of a global flood.
At the time society had a smaller view of the globe.
And
the fact there are huge cultures without such stories, and so much evidence that contradicts the idea, including the fossil record, we can be confident no
such flood happened.
Bullshit lies.
You need some Randall Carlson and Graham Hancock in your library.
On 5/18/2026 4:36 PM, zendejo wrote:
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/drag-queen-story-hour-
admits- to-grooming-your-kids/
Focus On The Family is gayer than anything the drag queens are
displaying to the kids, heh.a You ever see James Dobson speak?a The
guy was a fag beyond belief, not homosexual, but definitely a flamer.
Shoot the messenger noted again.
Toodles dear.
Oh that was nothing. Look at Dobson's record on politics. He *refused*
to endorse John McCain, over Obama, because of McCain's use of vulgar language. He went on *to* endorse *TRUMP*, over H. Clinton, because by
then he'd had enough of the Democrats' tolerance of LGBTQ people and whatnot.
He was a fuckface. A loser, a retard.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 01:54:38 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
10 files (20,373K bytes) |
| Messages: | 264,321 |
