• The Government Just Charged a Gay Man for Using a Phone Privacy Feature

    From George Floyd@george@worm.food to alt.activism,comp.mobile.android,comp.os.linux.advocacy,sac.politics,talk.politics.guns on Fri Aug 7 09:34:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

    When Samuel Tunick landed at Hartsfield-Jackson on January 24, 2025,
    handing CBP agents his phone's passcode seemed routine rCo until the
    screen went blank, the device flashed, restarted, and the data vanished.
    The Atlanta resident and American citizen had given border officers a
    passcode for his Google Pixel. But this wasn't a regular unlock code.
    According to prosecutors, it was a duress passcode, a feature of
    GrapheneOS that wipes the device clean instead of opening it. This case
    echoes broader concerns around surveillance app deployments targeting
    activists in cross-border contexts.

    The Justice Department charged Tunick under 18 U.S.C. -o 2232(a), which criminalizes destroying property during a lawful search or seizure and
    carries up to five years in prison. He pleaded not guilty. Security
    experts say this prosecution appears to be the first of its kind.

    A Privacy OS Built for People Who Need It Most
    GrapheneOS is the Signal of mobile operating systems rCo and its signature feature just became Exhibit A.

    Think of GrapheneOS as a hardened Android fork built specifically for journalists, activists, and anyone who can't afford a data breach. The
    duress passcode is a deliberate feature, not a loophole. One detail
    wipe. That complicates the government's "destruction of property" theory considerably.

    "I have not seen this before, though I've discussed the potential
    scenario with activists and journalists over the years," said Runa
    Sandvik, founder of security consultancy Granitt.

    Tunick's defense team argues the seizure was unlawful from the start.

    denied him access to a lawyer

    never informed him of his rights

    used child-exploitation concerns as a pretext

    with Defend the Atlanta Forest, the environmental movement opposing
    Atlanta's planned "Cop City" law enforcement training complex.

    CBP agents also asserted they needed no warrant because Tunick had not
    yet legally crossed the border rCo a position reflecting the government's long-standing claim of broad search authority at ports of entry.
    Assistant federal public defender Matthew Dodge called the statute's application here "incredibly rare."

    What This Means for Your Phone When You Travel
    The smarter move isn't a last-second wipe rCo it's crossing the border
    with nothing worth finding.

    of time, you can always download the data you need once you get to where

    travel phones

    cloud-based workflows

    pre-departure wipes with post-arrival restores

    The Electronic Frontier Foundation maintains similar guidance on
    protecting data at the border, emphasizing minimal local storage over
    in-situ countermeasures. Concerns about government access to devices
    have also fueled reports of apps secretly tracking users without
    consent.

    The indictment itself rCo which misspells the country as "Untied States" rCo reads like a warning shot aimed at anyone relying on privacy tools under pressure.

    The Atlanta federal court's ruling on the suppression motion is expected
    later this year. If the government's theory survives, activating a
    built-in phone feature during a border search becomes criminal
    obstruction for every traveler carrying a locked device through U.S.
    customs. That's not a niche activist problem. That's everyone's problem.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/government-just-charged-man- using-144905054.html
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to alt.activism,comp.mobile.android,comp.os.linux.advocacy,nz.politics on Fri Aug 7 08:17:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

    On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 09:34:11 +0200, George Floyd wrote:

    CBP agents also asserted they needed no warrant because Tunick had
    not yet legally crossed the border rCo a position reflecting the
    government's long-standing claim of broad search authority at ports
    of entry.

    Either US law applies, or it doesnrCOt. Can you really get away with
    saying that the enforcement powers apply, but the checks and balances
    donrCOt?
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2