• self host providers

    From bixbox@noreply@example.invalid to comp.misc on Tue Aug 11 12:49:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.misc

    Hello,
    apologize in advance if that is the wrong group or it was posted
    already.
    I search around extensively but I did not found much.

    I want to share some of my git repo in read only mode, but for personal
    reason I don't want to use existing web apps provider like github or
    gitlab and the like.

    People should be free to fork it but I want to maintain the repo with simple "git am" and friend that are more than enough for me.

    I did some research and some cloud providers are the usual suspect
    Oracle Cloud
    Google Cloud
    etc. etc.

    I planning to use unauthenticated read only git daemon, and I more than
    happy to get a vm that has some disk space and network ip and be hosted somewhere, I can maintain that.

    One concern is that many free tier will charge you if you run of out
    quota on traffic,cpu end the like.
    I would like to have a hard cap or being throttle, no problem.


    Anyone have some working setup or suggestion, or maybe is a bad idea :)

    apologize in a advance for the babbling

    bix


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marco Moock@mm@dorfdsl.de to comp.misc on Tue Aug 11 15:10:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.misc

    Am 11.08.26 um 12:49 schrieb bixbox:
    One concern is that many free tier will charge you if you run of out
    quota on traffic,cpu end the like.
    I would like to have a hard cap or being throttle, no problem.

    There are some that deliver unlimited traffic, but often have limited bandwidth. Should be fine for your use case.
    --
    Gru|f
    Marco

    Junk-Mail bitte an trashcan@stinkedores.dorfdsl.de
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bixbox@noreply@example.invalid to comp.misc on Tue Aug 11 22:55:32 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.misc

    Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> writes:

    There are some that deliver unlimited traffic, but often have limited bandwidth. Should be fine for your use case.

    Do you have some link to suggest? limited bandwidth is perfectly fine.

    bix
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From not@not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) to comp.misc on Wed Aug 12 08:52:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.misc

    bixbox <noreply@example.invalid> wrote:
    I did some research and some cloud providers are the usual suspect
    Oracle Cloud
    Google Cloud
    etc. etc.

    I planning to use unauthenticated read only git daemon, and I more than
    happy to get a vm that has some disk space and network ip and be hosted somewhere, I can maintain that.

    One concern is that many free tier will charge you if you run of out
    quota on traffic,cpu end the like.
    I would like to have a hard cap or being throttle, no problem.

    It was a long time ago now, but I think when I signed up with
    Oracle Cloud the CC used for ID wasn't automatically saved as a
    payment method. That card has since expired so they don't have any
    details through which to charge me anyway. They say the data upload
    quota for their "always free tier" is 10TB/month, but they don't
    mention what happens after that so I guess there's a risk they
    might permanently suspend your account until a fee is paid: https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/FreeTier/freetier_topic-Always_Free_Resources.htm

    The Oracle Cloud VPSs are a bit of a pain to set up, and you need
    to avoid features that aren't "allways free" during the initial 30
    day trial after which VPSs using those features are shut down.

    There's also this one. It says badwidth is limited to 1TB, but:

    "If the inclusive traffic is exceeded, the connection becomes capped
    to 1Mbit/s, if no additional traffic is purchased by customer."
    https://www.euserv.com/en/virtual-private-server/root-vserver/v2/vs2-free.php

    Oh, when you turn on Javascript it says "Sold out". Maybe there are
    newer offers, I haven't looked into it for a long time.

    There's also this in my bookmarks, but I also can't see what
    happens when you exceed their 2TB limit: https://www.vultr.com/free-tier-program/ https://blogs.vultr.com/new-free-tier-plan/
    --
    __ __
    #_ < |\| |< _#
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marco Moock@mm@dorfdsl.de to comp.misc on Wed Aug 12 11:27:20 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.misc

    Am 11.08.26 um 22:55 schrieb bixbox:
    Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> writes:

    There are some that deliver unlimited traffic, but often have limited
    bandwidth. Should be fine for your use case.

    Do you have some link to suggest? limited bandwidth is perfectly fine.

    I had a VPS at hostglobal.plus that offered that.
    --
    Gru|f
    Marco

    Junk-Mail bitte an trashcan@stinkedores.dorfdsl.de
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bixbox@noreply@example.invalid to comp.misc on Wed Aug 12 10:59:34 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.misc

    not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) writes:

    bixbox <noreply@example.invalid> wrote:
    mention what happens after that so I guess there's a risk they
    might permanently suspend your account until a fee is paid: https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/FreeTier/freetier_topic-Always_Free_Resources.htm

    The Oracle Cloud VPSs are a bit of a pain to set up, and you need
    to avoid features that aren't "allways free" during the initial 30
    day trial after which VPSs using those features are shut down.

    There's also this one. It says badwidth is limited to 1TB, but:

    "If the inclusive traffic is exceeded, the connection becomes capped
    to 1Mbit/s, if no additional traffic is purchased by customer."
    https://www.euserv.com/en/virtual-private-server/root-vserver/v2/vs2-free.php

    There's also this in my bookmarks, but I also can't see what
    happens when you exceed their 2TB limit: https://www.vultr.com/free-tier-program/ https://blogs.vultr.com/new-free-tier-plan/

    Awesome. Thank a lot, I'm checking the now. Oracle FAQ are note very
    clear of what happen in case of exceeding the Free tier quota

    bix
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Theo@theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk to comp.misc on Wed Aug 12 16:56:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.misc

    bixbox <noreply@example.invalid> wrote:
    Hello,
    apologize in advance if that is the wrong group or it was posted
    already.
    I search around extensively but I did not found much.

    I want to share some of my git repo in read only mode, but for personal reason I don't want to use existing web apps provider like github or
    gitlab and the like.

    People should be free to fork it but I want to maintain the repo with simple "git am" and friend that are more than enough for me.

    I did some research and some cloud providers are the usual suspect
    Oracle Cloud
    Google Cloud
    etc. etc.

    I planning to use unauthenticated read only git daemon, and I more than
    happy to get a vm that has some disk space and network ip and be hosted somewhere, I can maintain that.

    One concern is that many free tier will charge you if you run of out
    quota on traffic,cpu end the like.
    I would like to have a hard cap or being throttle, no problem.

    If you just want a cheap virtual private server (VPS) to host your own stuff on (ie you manage running the daemons to provide whatever services you want),
    take a look at:
    https://lowendbox.com/
    https://lowendtalk.com/
    https://www.webhostingtalk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=104

    You'll pay, but some are few dollars a month/year. As regards traffic, policies vary but I expect some will throttle when you reach your cap.

    Do consider some kind of AI bot blocking, as this consumes a big chunk of traffic and CPU time nowadays.

    Theo
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From not@not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) to comp.misc on Thu Aug 13 08:31:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.misc

    Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
    Do consider some kind of AI bot blocking, as this consumes a big chunk of traffic and CPU time nowadays.

    Oh great, and make another site that won't let me in unless I'm
    using a mainstream Web browser.

    I host 91GB of files over public HTTP on my Oracle Cloud VPS, with
    no robots.txt let alone some Kev-blocking system. Crawlers are
    continuously hitting it, but over almost two years the total
    uploaded data is 6.6TB - a very long way off the 10TB/month limit.

    CPU load is also low (most content there is static). That said,
    their free VPSs are over-subscribed so you don't get the sort of
    CPU performance you might see with a paid service using an
    equivalent-spec CPU.
    --
    __ __
    #_ < |\| |< _#
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to comp.misc on Wed Aug 12 23:51:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.misc

    On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 10:59:34 +0200, bixbox wrote:

    Oracle FAQ are note very clear of what happen in case of exceeding
    the Free tier quota

    No doubt a company who subscribe to the view that the rCLArCY in rCLFAQrCY stands for rCLAskedrCY, not rCLAnsweredrCY ...
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bixbox@noreply@example.invalid to comp.misc on Thu Aug 13 11:48:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.misc

    Lawrence DrCOOliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:

    On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 10:59:34 +0200, bixbox wrote:

    Oracle FAQ are note very clear of what happen in case of exceeding
    the Free tier quota

    No doubt a company who subscribe to the view that the rCLArCY in rCLFAQrCY stands for rCLAskedrCY, not rCLAnsweredrCY ...

    going to steal that from you :P , is so true, especially when the "asked" is about money.

    bix
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Theo@theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk to comp.misc on Thu Aug 13 11:18:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.misc

    Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote:
    Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
    Do consider some kind of AI bot blocking, as this consumes a big chunk of traffic and CPU time nowadays.

    Oh great, and make another site that won't let me in unless I'm
    using a mainstream Web browser.

    I didn't say that. There are other ways, including blocking known AI User-Agents and blocking IPs/ranges which are seen to hammer your server.
    It's a depressing game of cat and mouse. The Cloudflare / Anubis browser-checkers are one tool you can use, but there are others.

    CPU load is also low (most content there is static). That said,
    their free VPSs are over-subscribed so you don't get the sort of
    CPU performance you might see with a paid service using an
    equivalent-spec CPU.

    It's a particular problem if you are hosting dynamic content - eg I hosted webSVN and the bots tied up the server in knots as every page is full of links to other dynamic pages. The CPU couldn't serve them fast enough to keep on
    top of the bots requesting them all.

    Theo
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nuno Silva@nunojsilva@invalid.invalid to comp.misc on Fri Aug 14 12:18:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.misc

    On 2026-08-13, Theo wrote:

    Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote:
    Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
    Do consider some kind of AI bot blocking, as this consumes a big chunk of >> > traffic and CPU time nowadays.

    Oh great, and make another site that won't let me in unless I'm
    using a mainstream Web browser.

    I didn't say that. There are other ways, including blocking known AI User-Agents and blocking IPs/ranges which are seen to hammer your server. It's a depressing game of cat and mouse. The Cloudflare / Anubis browser-checkers are one tool you can use, but there are others.

    Please do not use Cloudflare unless you configure it to somehow allow
    other browsers than the ones they support. It was already frustrating
    that they'd require JS, but ever since the Browser Integrity Check was reimplemented on top of Turnstile they've stopped caring about
    fallbacks.

    At least Anubis in the default config allows some workarounds, and from
    what I've seen some deployments even work without JS.

    CPU load is also low (most content there is static). That said,
    their free VPSs are over-subscribed so you don't get the sort of
    CPU performance you might see with a paid service using an
    equivalent-spec CPU.

    It's a particular problem if you are hosting dynamic content - eg I hosted webSVN and the bots tied up the server in knots as every page is full of links
    to other dynamic pages. The CPU couldn't serve them fast enough to keep on top of the bots requesting them all.

    Theo
    --
    Nuno Silva
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From noel@deletethis@invalid.lan to comp.misc on Sun Aug 16 11:32:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.misc

    On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:18:52 +0100, Nuno Silva wrote:

    Please do not use Cloudflare unless you configure it to somehow allow
    other browsers than the ones they support. It was already frustrating
    that they'd require JS, but ever since the Browser Integrity Check was reimplemented on top of Turnstile they've stopped caring about
    fallbacks.

    I dunno, cloudfares anal retentiveness helps some businesses (and helps destroy others), as recent as last Thursday when I decided to upgrade my
    HF radio (several thousands of dollars), I was stopped by cloudfares
    usual "your browser sucks go away" page, so moved onto the next online business in my google search return, which accepted me so got my dollars instead.

    The cloudfare denied site was charging $xx45, the seond preference I
    could get to was $xx99, that extra 50 odd bux was worth not wasting my
    time trying to play the get around cloudfare game.

    If cloudfare think im going to change browsers to suite them, they sure
    dont know me ;)

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Q8OzaWzDrW4=?= =?UTF-8?B?IE5pb2Nsw6Fzw61u?= =?UTF-8?B?IEdsb3N0w6lpcg==?=@thanks-to@Taf.com to comp.misc on Sun Aug 16 18:07:28 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.misc

    Did you consider Insomnia 24/7?
    (S. HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/ fuer Kontaktdaten!)
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2