From Newsgroup: comp.lang.mumps

<div>Simplified Arabic (called Yakout since 1967) is a simplified Arabic font that allowed Arabic text to be composed using a Linotype machine.[1][2] It was first announced in 1959 as Mrowa-Linotype Simplified Arabic.[1][3][4] The font was developed by Kamel Mrowa, Nabih Jaroudi, and Linotype & Machinery Ltd. staff under the guidance of Walter Tracy.[1][3]</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>download simplified arabic</div><div></div><div>N+ADownload File: https://t.co/FYuVVf1xb4 N+A</div><div></div><div></div><div>In 1954, Kamel Mrowa contacted the British company Linotype & Machinery Ltd. (L&M), formed by the merger of the Linotype Company Limited (registered in 1889) and the Machinery Trust Limited (registered in 1893),[5] with the idea of developing a new, simplified Arabic typeface.[1] His idea took inspiration from Arabic typewriters, which, by overlapping the letters, condensed the four forms of each letter Arabic letter (isolated, initial, medial, and final) into two (isolated-final and initial-medial).[1]</div><div></div><div></div><div>I am converting an Arabic document from word 2016 to pdf. The font used in word document is Simplified Arabic, When I opened the converted pdf in acrobat dc some Arabic texts are not selecteable or searchable. But in the same word Document when I used Arial font instead of Simplified arabic , the converted PDF is searchable and selectable. Actually I need simplified arabic as font. please help. Thanks</div><div></div><div></div><div>Thanks. Actually this word file is using Kashida in it, so when I change to Arial the formting/ alignment is getting wrong . Because the kashida ( elongated using shift + J in word) in Simplied arabic is smallar than kashida in arial. Could you please suggest or do you have any idea of any other font paid or not which is using same kashida length of simplified Arabic font . This document is 1700+ pages. Thanks</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>I have to convert MS word documents to pdf to use them on a pc in a proof reading package, I am having issues with arabic fonts.</div><div></div><div>I understood there where issues with Simplified Arabic so I purchased the latest language pack for Office, this came with Arabic Transparent font, It still seems to generate the same errors as Simplified Arabic eg licence issues</div><div></div><div></div><div>If you want to know in detail how you can use polyglossia to activate multiple languages and switch between them, I recommend you have a look in the polyglossia manual. Here is one example (I just used Amiri as an arabic font because I had it installed already):</div><div></div><div></div><div>As for the characters, you might want to change the font. We are pulling from word in simplified arabic, which turns into arial in marketo. And if you are uploading a list of names with arabic characters, try this: =000003837&language=en_US</div><div></div><div></div><div>Background: Debates have arisen in various non-English speaking countries over the chosen language of instruction in medical education, whether it has to be the English language or the mother tongue. English-based education supporters argue that English is the leading international language of medicine and research, and a crucial tool for Continuing Medical Education (CME), as well as for students who seek practice abroad. On the other hand, mother-tongue-based medical education supporters present it as a way to endorse communication and comprehension between medical practitioners and health care system users, to bridge the gap between practitioners and the paramedical staff, and to overcome linguistic dualism and the language thinking disparity while studying in another. This study aimed to evaluate one of the simplified bi-lingual approaches in terms of medical-educational-written texts for a non-English speaking population: Arabic speaking medical students in specific.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Methods: 1546 Arabic-speaking-medical students from different countries participated in a one-step-interactive-experimental-online test. The test assessed participants' scientific comprehension of three distinct written paragraphs: The first paragraph used conventional mother tongue (Arabic), the second combined English terminology and simplified mother tongue (hybrid), and the third used an English excerpt (English). Two multiple-choice questions (First question in Arabic, second in English) followed each paragraph. Response time was communicated for each paragraph. Participants were asked to select their favorable method. Repeated Measures ANOVA models and Paired Samples t-Test were used for statistical analysis.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Conclusions: Taking into consideration the large number of participants and the statistically significant results, authors propose that simplified Arabic combined with English terminology may present a viable alternative method for medical-educational-written texts in Arabic-speaking population.</div><div></div><div></div><div>The goal of this concept for a simplified Arabic alphabet was to have a very uniform appearance in terms of size and shapes. Fearing that the design may be too minimal, I also allowed a variation with asenders and desendres, indicated here in light lines, to bring the appearance closer to traditional forms.</div><div></div><div> Typeface design, 1976, Mamoun Sakkal, Aleppo, Syria.</div><div></div><div></div><div>In this study on the preferences of Arab patients for printed health education materials, the use of culturally appropriate and acceptable health advice was felt to be essential. Recommendations by our study subjects such as the need for short sentences, clear examples, comparisons and quantified information corroborate a recent systematic review of health education interventions [14]. These may be cross-cultural preferences, although some of our findings are applicable to Arab communities only, such as the use of standard Arabic as opposed to regional dialects and the placement of diacritical marks on printed words. However, as Sheridan et al. [14] point out, although simplified text has a beneficial effect on patients with limited literacy, the use of media such as pictures has had conflicting results on comprehension in randomized controlled trials of health education materials.</div><div></div><div> dca57bae1f</div>
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2