do you used ai to generate codes in c? some observations or
thoughts maybe?
i used some first time in april this year and-a generally
was schocked (ai (i mean chat gpt) i used in 2024 limited way
and in 2025 first time in more indepth talks)
i state this question becouse is quite big topic and i think it needs
some kind of dialectic thoughts/talk to get more indepth view on some
basics maybe
for me first case of shoc was how good it answers on programing related questions..for example it was able to generate complec winapi based
routines and even could warn me on gdi leaks and indepth and
hard to learn things like that
second piece of shoc it was that its able to generate quite big and
usable pieces of code..hovever it seems to have limitations
i probably noticed if you give him (or her, in polish its more like
her (as inteligence /inteligencja is female word)) a big block of code
to generate at once the probability of it having some errors seems to increase.. so maybe there is a limit.. hovever i gave him or her
a task of generating like 1000 line blocks of code andafter
some dose of talks and 'rerolls' it went quite well
it seems that if give it to generate smaller pieces it maybe work even better (though i must then integrate those pieces)
note i only use free chatgpt and possibly paid ones could be much better
but even this free version is shocking
some night a gave it a task to generate some cheap image codec and it
manage to write quite complex piece of code on which by hand i probably
need work a week or maybe even two (not only write but do some tests
and so on)..todaj i gave hima-a task to writa app that draws chessboard
with pices and a mechanic to move pieces on this board by mouse but
only in legal way (i mean white starts and only van make one of legal
moves) then black only can move legal way and so on)..it spitted the
code on the fly.. what he has problems was drawing sompe ches pieces procedurally especialy knight he made a total mess and i even couldnt
make him/her to made this task
in may i by the chznse also wanted to generate primitive based even aminmated 'sprites' in game and it was that some time it was making absolutelly stuning results and otherwise was making bad crap and i was unable to make him/her do it at least average or basic rights
and that how it looks like
some thoughts on ai? programing using it? its so important tool right
now that in fact learning how to use it to work well/bbest is a basic programming skill today imo
On 9/26/2026 9:39 AM, fir wrote:
do you used ai to generate codes in c? some observations or
thoughts maybe?
i used some first time in april this year and-a generally
was schocked (ai (i mean chat gpt) i used in 2024 limited way
and in 2025 first time in more indepth talks)
i state this question becouse is quite big topic and i think it needs
some kind of dialectic thoughts/talk to get more indepth view on some
basics maybe
for me first case of shoc was how good it answers on programing
related questions..for example it was able to generate complec winapi
based
routines and even could warn me on gdi leaks and indepth and
hard to learn things like that
second piece of shoc it was that its able to generate quite big and
usable pieces of code..hovever it seems to have limitations
i probably noticed if you give him (or her, in polish its more like
her (as inteligence /inteligencja is female word)) a big block of code
to generate at once the probability of it having some errors seems to
increase.. so maybe there is a limit.. hovever i gave him or her
a task of generating like 1000 line blocks of code andafter
some dose of talks and 'rerolls' it went quite well
it seems that if give it to generate smaller pieces it maybe work even
better (though i must then integrate those pieces)
note i only use free chatgpt and possibly paid ones could be much better
but even this free version is shocking
some night a gave it a task to generate some cheap image codec and it
manage to write quite complex piece of code on which by hand i
probably need work a week or maybe even two (not only write but do
some tests
and so on)..todaj i gave hima-a task to writa app that draws chessboard
with pices and a mechanic to move pieces on this board by mouse but
only in legal way (i mean white starts and only van make one of legal
moves) then black only can move legal way and so on)..it spitted the
code on the fly.. what he has problems was drawing sompe ches pieces
procedurally especialy knight he made a total mess and i even couldnt
make him/her to made this task
in may i by the chznse also wanted to generate primitive based even
aminmated 'sprites' in game and it was that some time it was making
absolutelly stuning results and otherwise was making bad crap and i
was unable to make him/her do it at least average or basic rights
and that how it looks like
some thoughts on ai? programing using it? its so important tool right
now that in fact learning how to use it to work well/bbest is a basic
programming skill today imo
Dear fir,
If you bother to look at my BlueSky profile, linked below, you'll find a picture of my set of compiler books.-a As implied with that picture, I
prefer to read physical books, and not rely an L.L.Ms. at all.
Therefore, I believe the /A.I/. as you call it, is not at all important.
What do you think?
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson pisze:
On 9/26/2026 9:39 AM, fir wrote:
do you used ai to generate codes in c? some observations or
thoughts maybe?
i used some first time in april this year and-a generally
was schocked (ai (i mean chat gpt) i used in 2024 limited way
and in 2025 first time in more indepth talks)
i state this question becouse is quite big topic and i think it needs
some kind of dialectic thoughts/talk to get more indepth view on some
basics maybe
for me first case of shoc was how good it answers on programing related questions..for example it was able to generate complec winapi based
routines and even could warn me on gdi leaks and indepth and
hard to learn things like that
second piece of shoc it was that its able to generate quite big and
usable pieces of code..hovever it seems to have limitations
i probably noticed if you give him (or her, in polish its more like
her (as inteligence /inteligencja is female word)) a big block of code
to generate at once the probability of it having some errors seems to increase.. so maybe there is a limit.. hovever i gave him or her
a task of generating like 1000 line blocks of code andafter
some dose of talks and 'rerolls' it went quite well
it seems that if give it to generate smaller pieces it maybe work even better (though i must then integrate those pieces)
note i only use free chatgpt and possibly paid ones could be much better >>> but even this free version is shocking
some night a gave it a task to generate some cheap image codec and it manage to write quite complex piece of code on which by hand i probably need work a week or maybe even two (not only write but do some tests
and so on)..todaj i gave hima-a task to writa app that draws chessboard with pices and a mechanic to move pieces on this board by mouse but
only in legal way (i mean white starts and only van make one of legal moves) then black only can move legal way and so on)..it spitted the code on the fly.. what he has problems was drawing sompe ches pieces
procedurally especialy knight he made a total mess and i even couldnt make him/her to made this task
in may i by the chznse also wanted to generate primitive based even aminmated 'sprites' in game and it was that some time it was making absolutelly stuning results and otherwise was making bad crap and i was unable to make him/her do it at least average or basic rights
and that how it looks like
some thoughts on ai? programing using it? its so important tool right now that in fact learning how to use it to work well/bbest is a basic
programming skill today imo
Dear fir,
If you bother to look at my BlueSky profile, linked below, you'll find a
picture of my set of compiler books.-a As implied with that picture, I
prefer to read physical books, and not rely an L.L.Ms. at all.
Therefore, I believe the /A.I/. as you call it, is not at all important.
What do you think?
if so youre ery vrong ai is terribly shocking in positive sense...
but its hard to talk on this with someone if someone not accepts the
basics
recently some guy here asked me if i use ai do i can code myself
(something like that) as it could have ask someone who has a car if
he can walk - its tremendously stupid ..neanderthal level
quote weird and funny people are like neanderthals as to ai
when its totally amazing
On Sat, 9/26/2026 5:27 PM, fir wrote:
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson pisze:
On 9/26/2026 9:39 AM, fir wrote:
do you used ai to generate codes in c? some observations or
thoughts maybe?
i used some first time in april this year and-a generally
was schocked (ai (i mean chat gpt) i used in 2024 limited way
and in 2025 first time in more indepth talks)
i state this question becouse is quite big topic and i think it needs
some kind of dialectic thoughts/talk to get more indepth view on some
basics maybe
for me first case of shoc was how good it answers on programing related questions..for example it was able to generate complec winapi based
routines and even could warn me on gdi leaks and indepth and
hard to learn things like that
second piece of shoc it was that its able to generate quite big and
usable pieces of code..hovever it seems to have limitations
i probably noticed if you give him (or her, in polish its more like
her (as inteligence /inteligencja is female word)) a big block of code >>>> to generate at once the probability of it having some errors seems to increase.. so maybe there is a limit.. hovever i gave him or her
a task of generating like 1000 line blocks of code andafter
some dose of talks and 'rerolls' it went quite well
it seems that if give it to generate smaller pieces it maybe work even better (though i must then integrate those pieces)
note i only use free chatgpt and possibly paid ones could be much better >>>> but even this free version is shocking
some night a gave it a task to generate some cheap image codec and it manage to write quite complex piece of code on which by hand i probably need work a week or maybe even two (not only write but do some tests
and so on)..todaj i gave hima-a task to writa app that draws chessboard with pices and a mechanic to move pieces on this board by mouse but
only in legal way (i mean white starts and only van make one of legal moves) then black only can move legal way and so on)..it spitted the code on the fly.. what he has problems was drawing sompe ches pieces
procedurally especialy knight he made a total mess and i even couldnt make him/her to made this task
in may i by the chznse also wanted to generate primitive based even aminmated 'sprites' in game and it was that some time it was making absolutelly stuning results and otherwise was making bad crap and i was unable to make him/her do it at least average or basic rights
and that how it looks like
some thoughts on ai? programing using it? its so important tool right now that in fact learning how to use it to work well/bbest is a basic
programming skill today imo
Dear fir,
If you bother to look at my BlueSky profile, linked below, you'll find a >>> picture of my set of compiler books.-a As implied with that picture, I
prefer to read physical books, and not rely an L.L.Ms. at all.
Therefore, I believe the /A.I/. as you call it, is not at all important. >>>
What do you think?
if so youre ery vrong ai is terribly shocking in positive sense...
but its hard to talk on this with someone if someone not accepts the
basics
recently some guy here asked me if i use ai do i can code myself
(something like that) as it could have ask someone who has a car if
he can walk - its tremendously stupid ..neanderthal level
quote weird and funny people are like neanderthals as to ai
when its totally amazing
People who know nothing at all, can ask an LLM-AI to write code for them.
The code they receive, might accidentally run the first time.
As an example, I asked the LLM-AI to draw me a picture. Instead of
listening to my instruction, it gave me a "Python card". It did not
say what to do with it. I flipped over to WSL2, checked that I had
Python 3.6 as the loaded version, added some libraries, ran the Python card, the output file was the image I requested. Notice that, I am NOT a Python programmer,
yet I successfully launched some code I was given and I got a result.
It's not true then, that you have to know anything, to have the LLM-AI
write you some code. I didn't ask for Python code, that request was
not in my prompt. I asked it to draw a picture. But, the material
delivered, worked as promised. And... I didn't learn a thing.
I still cannot write Python code.
*******
Most of the time, the code has issues, or a function prototype is
defined, but the body of the function has no code in it. Somebody
has to write that code. And that's the dev who then writes the code
for the missing bits. Most of the time then, you have to put on
your dev hat, and either re-write bits of it you don't like,
or find areas where it stopped working, and finish that code.
To write code in a "chat session", that causes a giant "context"
to form in the machine. You could either run out of resources
doing that, or, the machine can halt and say "you have run
out of tokens for today". If you were paying for the tokens,
on a $200 per month plan, I think your behavior towards
the LLM-AI would entirely change. When it costs money, we'll
come back and see how you feel then, about LLM-AI coder.
Paul
On Sat, 9/26/2026 5:27 PM, fir wrote:
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson pisze:
On 9/26/2026 9:39 AM, fir wrote:
do you used ai to generate codes in c? some observations or
thoughts maybe?
i used some first time in april this year and-a generally
was schocked (ai (i mean chat gpt) i used in 2024 limited way
and in 2025 first time in more indepth talks)
i state this question becouse is quite big topic and i think it needs
some kind of dialectic thoughts/talk to get more indepth view on some
basics maybe
for me first case of shoc was how good it answers on programing related questions..for example it was able to generate complec winapi based
routines and even could warn me on gdi leaks and indepth and
hard to learn things like that
second piece of shoc it was that its able to generate quite big and
usable pieces of code..hovever it seems to have limitations
i probably noticed if you give him (or her, in polish its more like
her (as inteligence /inteligencja is female word)) a big block of code >>>> to generate at once the probability of it having some errors seems to increase.. so maybe there is a limit.. hovever i gave him or her
a task of generating like 1000 line blocks of code andafter
some dose of talks and 'rerolls' it went quite well
it seems that if give it to generate smaller pieces it maybe work even better (though i must then integrate those pieces)
note i only use free chatgpt and possibly paid ones could be much better >>>> but even this free version is shocking
some night a gave it a task to generate some cheap image codec and it manage to write quite complex piece of code on which by hand i probably need work a week or maybe even two (not only write but do some tests
and so on)..todaj i gave hima-a task to writa app that draws chessboard with pices and a mechanic to move pieces on this board by mouse but
only in legal way (i mean white starts and only van make one of legal moves) then black only can move legal way and so on)..it spitted the code on the fly.. what he has problems was drawing sompe ches pieces
procedurally especialy knight he made a total mess and i even couldnt make him/her to made this task
in may i by the chznse also wanted to generate primitive based even aminmated 'sprites' in game and it was that some time it was making absolutelly stuning results and otherwise was making bad crap and i was unable to make him/her do it at least average or basic rights
and that how it looks like
some thoughts on ai? programing using it? its so important tool right now that in fact learning how to use it to work well/bbest is a basic
programming skill today imo
Dear fir,
If you bother to look at my BlueSky profile, linked below, you'll find a >>> picture of my set of compiler books.-a As implied with that picture, I
prefer to read physical books, and not rely an L.L.Ms. at all.
Therefore, I believe the /A.I/. as you call it, is not at all important. >>>
What do you think?
if so youre ery vrong ai is terribly shocking in positive sense...
but its hard to talk on this with someone if someone not accepts the
basics
recently some guy here asked me if i use ai do i can code myself
(something like that) as it could have ask someone who has a car if
he can walk - its tremendously stupid ..neanderthal level
quote weird and funny people are like neanderthals as to ai
when its totally amazing
People who know nothing at all, can ask an LLM-AI to write code for them.
The code they receive, might accidentally run the first time.
As an example, I asked the LLM-AI to draw me a picture. Instead of
listening to my instruction, it gave me a "Python card". It did not
say what to do with it. I flipped over to WSL2, checked that I had
Python 3.6 as the loaded version, added some libraries, ran the Python card, the output file was the image I requested. Notice that, I am NOT a Python programmer,
yet I successfully launched some code I was given and I got a result.
It's not true then, that you have to know anything, to have the LLM-AI
write you some code. I didn't ask for Python code, that request was
not in my prompt. I asked it to draw a picture. But, the material
delivered, worked as promised. And... I didn't learn a thing.
I still cannot write Python code.
now i began to be pity i was not born in like 2012 and having 14 years
now with ai i would do totally much more programming then back then
On 9/27/2026 3:47 PM, fir wrote:
now i began to be pity i was not born in like 2012 and having 14 years
now with ai i would do totally much more programming then back then
I don't mind being slightly elder.-a Though you are older than me.
I am now living my teenage dreams, and learning CorelDRAW!-a I came
across this program for the first time in 1994, it was probably Corel-
DRAW! 5.-a Sadly, my computer was not up to the task of running it, as
I only had 4mb of R.A.M.
I've also lived my teenage dreams of coding D.O.S. in assembly, and have managed to get my own D.O.S. device driver up and running, well, so to
speak as it doesn't do anything.-a It's not even an equivalent of /dev/
zero.
The biggest change in terms of technology since then, when it comes to CorelDRAW! is that I have no problems taking digital photographs, and
then use them to trace the vector graphics.-a Which is very convenient,
as I don't have a /digitizer/.-a I think those are the /mice/ with the
cross hairs people used to trace traditional art into vectors on com-
puters.
In any case, I've been doing both D.O.S. programming and art with Corel- DRAW! without much help from the A.I.-a At /worst/ I simply ask it a question, and then usually do something completely different from the
answer, because these things are pretty stupid.
So, don't begrudge your age, and simply do what you've always wanted to
do!
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson pisze:
On 9/27/2026 3:47 PM, fir wrote:
now i began to be pity i was not born in like 2012 and having 14
years now with ai i would do totally much more programming then back
then
I don't mind being slightly elder.-a Though you are older than me.
I am now living my teenage dreams, and learning CorelDRAW!-a I came
across this program for the first time in 1994, it was probably Corel-
DRAW! 5.-a Sadly, my computer was not up to the task of running it, as
I only had 4mb of R.A.M.
I've also lived my teenage dreams of coding D.O.S. in assembly, and have
managed to get my own D.O.S. device driver up and running, well, so to
speak as it doesn't do anything.-a It's not even an equivalent of /dev/
zero.
The biggest change in terms of technology since then, when it comes to
CorelDRAW! is that I have no problems taking digital photographs, and
then use them to trace the vector graphics.-a Which is very convenient,
as I don't have a /digitizer/.-a I think those are the /mice/ with the
cross hairs people used to trace traditional art into vectors on com-
puters.
In any case, I've been doing both D.O.S. programming and art with Corel-
DRAW! without much help from the A.I.-a At /worst/ I simply ask it a
question, and then usually do something completely different from the
answer, because these things are pretty stupid.
if it so wtupid how you explain that it answers better than you..??
as it dont say nothing about corel draw all of a sudden ??
ai it terryfic
(i answered slightly better answer before but it wanished probably disconnection)
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 121:16:22 |
| Calls: | 1,194 |
| Files: | 1,352 |
| Messages: | 290,208 |