• Re: Pro Gauss-Jordan Reduction, Phigs and Phigs+

    From Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson@johann@myrkraverk.invalid to sci.math,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.c on Mon Aug 3 02:35:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.c

    On 03/08/2026 2:27 AM, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:

    I'm on the other hand, pro-Gauss-Jordan reduction.-a I may even
    try to code it in C on my own, instead of doing it the coward's
    way and use Sage like a "normal" mathematician.


    And in sci.math, don't think I have anything against "normal" mathe-
    maticians. It's just a question of how we define "normal." Are we
    talking about normalized mathematicians like we do to SQL databases,
    or are we talking about Smith and Hermite normal forms [which I did
    not know were terms until I looked at the Wolfram website], or just
    a regular normal form mathematician like we do in /lineal algebra/?

    Have a nice and normal mathematical day!
    --
    Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/
    I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Michael S@already5chosen@yahoo.com to comp.lang.c on Sun Aug 2 22:11:44 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.c

    On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 02:27:52 +0800
    Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> wrote:


    I'm on the other hand, pro-Gauss-Jordan reduction. I may even
    try to code it in C on my own, instead of doing it the coward's
    way and use Sage like a "normal" mathematician.


    40+ years ago I coded G-J decomposition (with selection of main
    element, how else?) on Wang clone in machine codes.
    Not because I considered people that are doing it in C cowards, but
    because
    A) there was no C compiler
    B) I did not know C yet

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson@johann@myrkraverk.invalid to comp.lang.c on Mon Aug 3 05:04:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.c

    On 03/08/2026 3:11 AM, Michael S wrote:
    On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 02:27:52 +0800
    Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> wrote:


    I'm on the other hand, pro-Gauss-Jordan reduction. I may even
    try to code it in C on my own, instead of doing it the coward's
    way and use Sage like a "normal" mathematician.


    40+ years ago I coded G-J decomposition (with selection of main
    element, how else?) on Wang clone in machine codes.
    Not because I considered people that are doing it in C cowards, but
    because
    A) there was no C compiler
    B) I did not know C yet


    That's a perfectly reasonable way to code G-J decomposition. Now,
    40+ years ago, I didn't because

    1) I was too young,
    2) I didn't know Wang made computers.


    Next time, remember that C has complex numbers now, and you can
    just code the field /C/ in C without too much trouble.
    --
    Johann | email: invalid -> com | http://www.myrkraverk.com/blog/
    I'm not from the Internet, I just work there. | via Easynews.com
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2