• Science vs Pseudo-Science; Modern "Science"

    From Derek Ignatius Asirvadem@derek.asirvadem@gmail.com to comp.databases.theory on Tue Jul 27 19:34:32 2021
    From Newsgroup: comp.databases.theory

    On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 10:49:58 UTC+10, Derek Ignatius Asirvadem wrote:
    On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 21:37:57 UTC+10, Nicola wrote:


    Here is my take on science, as it has been 350BC to 1911. (Which is under attack since 1911, by Modernism.) It is a body of knowledge (certainty: the Latin word means knowledge not speculation). Of course, one can speculate BASED ON that body of knowledge, and that is HYPOTHESIS, which when confirmed by tests is elevated to THEORY. If and when the theory is proved (proper proof, proper method, not merely a mathematical definition of a theory), it progresses to a truth, and is added to that body of knowledge.

    When that theory, which is proved in one or the other vertical gets proved in many verticals, it is elevated to LAW, such as the LAW of Thermodynamics, and it applies to all other sciences. Eg. evolutionism fails the second LAW of Thermodynamics.
    <<<
    The purpose of science is to determine the truth. (Truth pre-existed its notice by humans.)
    Eg. in the old days, scientists were RESPONSIBLE humans, they dealt with issues within their science, and tore down absurd theories, they applies the Four Laws of Thought and resolved any unresolved issue (LEM), they rejected any contradiction (LNC). The result being, lay people did not have to argue about an issue. Due to their grounding in Reality, in Objective Truth, opinions and consensus and citations were irrelevant. One either accepted objective truth and remained sane, or one rejected it and embraced insanity. There is no argument to be had.
    In these dark days, when the best of human filth is propagandised as rCLsciencerCY, the counter-point needs to be articulated.
    With the implementation of Modernism in science, since 1911 (date according to my research thus far, Modernism as it destroyed Philosophy was late 18th century):
    - Four Laws of Thought rejected
    - Logic suppressed
    - Composition & Causation (Cause & Effect) rejected
    - the natural hierarchy rejected
    - Atomicity rejected, fragments divorced from their context (the atom) and elevated
    - limited to Materialism (the intellectual realm rejected)
    - instead of ONE level of speculation BASED ON knowledge, speculation upon unproved speculation
    --- speculation upon unproved speculation upon unproved speculation
    ----- speculation upon unproved speculation upon unproved speculation upon unproved speculation
    - theories that keep changing (which in and of itself prove the theory false) and allowed to keep changing, in the fervent hope that if they change enough
    --- Evolutionism is the most propagandised and thus the best example: it defies logic and science; not a single shred of proof in 170 years; it lies in denial of evidence that proves it false; and the theory keep changing
    - introduction of relativism; subjectivism;
    --- as infamously promoted by the worlds greatest plagiarist, alberto sow-sucking einstein
    --- whose theories (other than the ones he stole) have all broken down, due to his plugging in false numbers that he rCLbelieved inrCY, instead of properly determined scientific numbers
    - thus the focus has moved, the purpose has been corrupted,
    - the purpose is now to PRODUCE the rCLtruthrCY
    --- which by definition means that it is not truth but fiction contrived by man - it is pseudo-science; anti-science; Modern rCLsciencerCY because it contradicts established science
    - mathematics (formalism; a language) promoted as a rCLsciencerCY, as a rCLlanguage of the universerCY
    - reframing truth as rCLclaimsrCY; Straw Man arguments against Science
    - since there is no objective truth, any and all issues can be argued, ad infinitum, without resolution
    - citations and consensus has become the measure of probability
    - totally irresponsible for adult humans
    - nothing less than insanity
    In this field, as evidenced, concerted suppression of the truth, the /RM/, and massive propaganda elevating 1960rCOs Record Filing Systems as rCLrelationalrCY. Anything the freaks did not invent (even FORTY YEARS after it was implemented by scientists) is ignored; denied, so that they can rCLinventrCY it from scratch.
    Whereas Science is characterised by Objective Truth; Reality, Modern rCLsciencerCY is characterised by its performers, its propagandists. Here is a perfect example of a two performers, one a heavily marketed rCLscientistrCY in conversation with another performer. This is the same freaky idiot that promotes NewtonrCOs Laws as precisely what it is not. The diminution of Science, the elevation of idiocy as rCLsciencerCY.
    ____ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbUoaBJd2sA
    Hence I reject it outright. As evidenced in my posts.
    If requested, I can articulate that further, or provide further detail; evidence; etc. As if there is not enough evidence in these threads.
    Cheers
    Derek
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2