• Who likes retrospective episodes?

    From Sylvia Else@sylvia@email.invalid to aus.tv on Mon Apr 12 12:20:17 2021
    From Newsgroup: aus.tv

    You know the ones I mean. A thinly disguised plot device is used as an
    excuse to reuse lots of footage from previous episodes.

    I hate this, and I've rather assumed everyone else does (except the
    producers, who get a cheap episode).

    But am I right?

    Sylvia.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Peter Jason@pj@jostle.com to aus.tv on Mon Apr 12 13:59:05 2021
    From Newsgroup: aus.tv

    On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:20:17 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
    wrote:

    You know the ones I mean. A thinly disguised plot device is used as an >excuse to reuse lots of footage from previous episodes.

    I hate this, and I've rather assumed everyone else does (except the >producers, who get a cheap episode).

    But am I right?

    Sylvia.

    Not me. Of course there is the PVR which can record episodes allowing
    one to ride the remote and fast-forward through the crap.

    Ever noticed the supreme skill of these hustlers in stretching
    15minutes of content into 60min viewing time?




    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sylvia Else@sylvia@email.invalid to aus.tv on Mon Apr 12 15:37:42 2021
    From Newsgroup: aus.tv

    On 12-Apr-21 1:59 pm, Peter Jason wrote:
    On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:20:17 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
    wrote:

    You know the ones I mean. A thinly disguised plot device is used as an
    excuse to reuse lots of footage from previous episodes.

    I hate this, and I've rather assumed everyone else does (except the
    producers, who get a cheap episode).

    But am I right?

    Sylvia.

    Not me. Of course there is the PVR which can record episodes allowing
    one to ride the remote and fast-forward through the crap.

    Ever noticed the supreme skill of these hustlers in stretching
    15minutes of content into 60min viewing time?



    Certainly, the PVR is a great help in these situations, but it doesn't
    remove the problem that one expected 40 minutes of viewing (after
    skipping the advertisements in a 1 hour program), and it turns out only
    to be 15 :(

    Sylvia.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From not@not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) to aus.tv on Mon Apr 12 23:46:04 2021
    From Newsgroup: aus.tv

    Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
    You know the ones I mean. A thinly disguised plot device is used as an excuse to reuse lots of footage from previous episodes.

    I hate this, and I've rather assumed everyone else does (except the producers, who get a cheap episode).

    But am I right?

    Michael Palin's one would have been alright if it wasn't so padded
    out with nonsense from talking heads besides Palin himself.

    The reason for them is obvious at the moment since stuff made
    pre-pandemic has all been shown by now. Hence I'm not finding much
    to watch on TV at all these days (it was bad enough before).
    --
    __ __
    #_ < |\| |< _#
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Peter Jason@pj@jostle.com to aus.tv on Tue Apr 13 11:51:20 2021
    From Newsgroup: aus.tv

    On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:37:42 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 12-Apr-21 1:59 pm, Peter Jason wrote:
    On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:20:17 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
    wrote:

    You know the ones I mean. A thinly disguised plot device is used as an
    excuse to reuse lots of footage from previous episodes.

    I hate this, and I've rather assumed everyone else does (except the
    producers, who get a cheap episode).

    But am I right?

    Sylvia.

    Not me. Of course there is the PVR which can record episodes allowing
    one to ride the remote and fast-forward through the crap.

    Ever noticed the supreme skill of these hustlers in stretching
    15minutes of content into 60min viewing time?



    Certainly, the PVR is a great help in these situations, but it doesn't >remove the problem that one expected 40 minutes of viewing (after
    skipping the advertisements in a 1 hour program), and it turns out only
    to be 15 :(

    Sylvia.

    I used to record favorite movies on TV to DVD platters. Using
    software I could excise the ads which took up +33% of the viewing
    time. Some popular movies had 50% ads.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Falscher Bruce@bruce56@topmail.co.nz to aus.tv on Fri Apr 16 18:34:43 2021
    From Newsgroup: aus.tv

    On Monday, April 12, 2021 at 1:38:31 PM UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote:

    Certainly, the PVR is a great help in these situations, but it doesn't remove the problem that one expected 40 minutes of viewing (after
    skipping the advertisements in a 1 hour program), and it turns out only
    to be 15 :(

    Sylvia.

    The "Classic Countdown" on ABC was okay - no adverts.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From keithr0@user@account.invalid to aus.tv on Sun Apr 18 17:29:00 2021
    From Newsgroup: aus.tv

    On 12/04/2021 12:20 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
    You know the ones I mean. A thinly disguised plot device is used as an excuse to reuse lots of footage from previous episodes.

    I hate this, and I've rather assumed everyone else does (except the producers, who get a cheap episode).

    But am I right?

    Sylvia.

    The most annoying thing is when they give a precis of the previous
    segment after the ads in case you have the attention span of a flea.
    Recording a show and fast forwarding through the ads and other annoying
    bits is the best idea. There is an hour show that I like to watch, but I
    get through it in 25 min by FFing the filler bits.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sylvia Else@sylvia@email.invalid to aus.tv on Thu Apr 22 09:32:31 2021
    From Newsgroup: aus.tv

    On 18-Apr-21 5:29 pm, keithr0 wrote:
    On 12/04/2021 12:20 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
    You know the ones I mean. A thinly disguised plot device is used as an
    excuse to reuse lots of footage from previous episodes.

    I hate this, and I've rather assumed everyone else does (except the
    producers, who get a cheap episode).

    But am I right?

    Sylvia.

    The most annoying thing is when they give a precis of the previous
    segment after the ads in case you have the attention span of a flea. Recording a show and fast forwarding through the ads and other annoying
    bits is the best idea. There is an hour show that I like to watch, but I
    get through it in 25 min by FFing the filler bits.

    Recapitis.

    Sometimes they seemed to backtrack further than the beginning of the
    previous segment, which made it extra confusing.

    I have the impression that the practice has diminished - or maybe it was
    just so annoying that I stopped watching that kind of show.

    Sylvia.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Peter Jason@pj@jostle.com to aus.tv on Thu Apr 22 11:19:19 2021
    From Newsgroup: aus.tv

    On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:32:31 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 18-Apr-21 5:29 pm, keithr0 wrote:
    On 12/04/2021 12:20 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
    You know the ones I mean. A thinly disguised plot device is used as an
    excuse to reuse lots of footage from previous episodes.

    I hate this, and I've rather assumed everyone else does (except the
    producers, who get a cheap episode).

    But am I right?

    Sylvia.

    The most annoying thing is when they give a precis of the previous
    segment after the ads in case you have the attention span of a flea.
    Recording a show and fast forwarding through the ads and other annoying
    bits is the best idea. There is an hour show that I like to watch, but I
    get through it in 25 min by FFing the filler bits.

    Recapitis.

    Sometimes they seemed to backtrack further than the beginning of the >previous segment, which made it extra confusing.

    I have the impression that the practice has diminished - or maybe it was >just so annoying that I stopped watching that kind of show.

    Sylvia.

    When recording I have to extend the finish time on the PVR because the
    channel overruns this. Sometimes 5min!
    The viewer's lot is not a happy one.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sylvia Else@sylvia@email.invalid to aus.tv on Thu Apr 22 12:31:23 2021
    From Newsgroup: aus.tv

    On 22-Apr-21 11:19 am, Peter Jason wrote:
    On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:32:31 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 18-Apr-21 5:29 pm, keithr0 wrote:
    On 12/04/2021 12:20 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
    You know the ones I mean. A thinly disguised plot device is used as an >>>> excuse to reuse lots of footage from previous episodes.

    I hate this, and I've rather assumed everyone else does (except the
    producers, who get a cheap episode).

    But am I right?

    Sylvia.

    The most annoying thing is when they give a precis of the previous
    segment after the ads in case you have the attention span of a flea.
    Recording a show and fast forwarding through the ads and other annoying
    bits is the best idea. There is an hour show that I like to watch, but I >>> get through it in 25 min by FFing the filler bits.

    Recapitis.

    Sometimes they seemed to backtrack further than the beginning of the
    previous segment, which made it extra confusing.

    I have the impression that the practice has diminished - or maybe it was
    just so annoying that I stopped watching that kind of show.

    Sylvia.

    When recording I have to extend the finish time on the PVR because the channel overruns this. Sometimes 5min!
    The viewer's lot is not a happy one.


    Fortunately, my DIY PVR lets me set a default extension to the finish
    time. For commercial channels 30 minutes has usually been enough, though
    there have been occasional exceptions.

    Sylvia.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sylvia Else@sylvia@email.invalid to aus.tv on Sat Apr 24 08:55:35 2021
    From Newsgroup: aus.tv

    On 12-Apr-21 12:20 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
    You know the ones I mean. A thinly disguised plot device is used as an excuse to reuse lots of footage from previous episodes.

    I hate this, and I've rather assumed everyone else does (except the producers, who get a cheap episode).

    But am I right?

    Sylvia.

    By total coincidence, I came across this related practice, which I'd not
    heard of before.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bottle_episode

    Sylvia.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2