I couldn't stomach more than 20 minutes of either.
Nomen Nescio wrote:
I couldn't stomach more than 20 minutes of either.
that stupid Jessica storyline went on and on..
I couldn't stomach more than 20 minutes of either.
On 30-Jan-23 9:24 pm, Nomen Nescio wrote:
I couldn't stomach more than 20 minutes of either.
I'm increasingly of the view that while broadcasters would like these >programs to be more popular, their primary function is to fill Australia >content requirements as cheaply as possible, and if they bomb on the
first day, that's not a huge concern.
Sylvia.
On 30-Jan-23 9:24 pm, Nomen Nescio wrote:
I couldn't stomach more than 20 minutes of either.
I'm increasingly of the view that while broadcasters would like these programs to be more popular, their primary function is to fill Australia content requirements as cheaply as possible, and if they bomb on the
first day, that's not a huge concern.
Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote
Nomen Nescio wrote
I couldn't stomach more than 20 minutes of either.
I'm increasingly of the view that while broadcasters would like these
programs to be more popular, their primary function is to fill Australia
content requirements as cheaply as possible, and if they bomb on the
first day, that's not a huge concern.
It's a concern to the taxpayers subsidizing this soapy rubbish
(I have not seen the program, but I think I know.)
Curious anomaly here in that the Dear People can spent in China all
they want, while Oz-content products are neglected.
Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote
Nomen Nescio wrote
I couldn't stomach more than 20 minutes of either.
I'm increasingly of the view that while broadcasters would like these
programs to be more popular, their primary function is to fill Australia
content requirements as cheaply as possible, and if they bomb on the
first day, that's not a huge concern.
Might be. Much of the Australian shows that I've watched lately are documentaries made by the ABC in the 2000s which I found online.
The latest: Constructing Australia (2008), and The Voyage of the
Nautilus (2001).
The ABC don't seem to be interested in making
those sorts of shows now.
I don't know why, they were good at it.
Of course they aren't likely to appeal to the MAFS audience, but
somehow nobody seems to be happy with current TV programming.
On 30-Jan-23 9:24 pm, Nomen Nescio wrote:
I couldn't stomach more than 20 minutes of either.
I'm increasingly of the view that while broadcasters would like these programs to be more popular, their primary function is to fill
Australia content requirements as cheaply as possible, and if they
bomb on the first day, that's not a huge concern.
Sylvia.--
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote
Nomen Nescio wrote
I couldn't stomach more than 20 minutes of either.
I'm not actually stupid enough to watch any of shit like that .
I'm increasingly of the view that while broadcasters would like these
programs to be more popular, their primary function is to fill
Australia
content requirements as cheaply as possible, and if they bomb on the
first day, that's not a huge concern.
Means that its stupid policy tho. Labor is about to force that on Netflix
etc too. Going to be interesting if they just bare their arse at Labor.
Might be. Much of the Australian shows that I've watched lately are
documentaries made by the ABC in the 2000s which I found online.
The latest: Constructing Australia (2008), and The Voyage of the
Nautilus (2001).
I did watch Constructing Australia (2008) when it was broadcast.
Didn't watch The Voyage of the Nautilus (2001).
The ABC don't seem to be interested in making
those sorts of shows now.
They do make other docos tho.
I don't know why, they were good at it.
Likely hardly anyone watched them.
Of course they aren't likely to appeal to the MAFS audience, but
somehow nobody seems to be happy with current TV programming.
Plenty clearly do watch plenty of it but its hard to compete
with Netflix etc where you can watch it any time you like.
On 4/02/2023 8:42 am, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 30-Jan-23 9:24 pm, Nomen Nescio wrote:
I couldn't stomach more than 20 minutes of either.
I'm increasingly of the view that while broadcasters would like these
programs to be more popular, their primary function is to fill
Australia content requirements as cheaply as possible, and if they
bomb on the first day, that's not a huge concern.
no MAFS and Bachie are hugely popular and money spinners for the networks
On 5/02/2023 11:19 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
On 4/02/2023 8:42 am, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 30-Jan-23 9:24 pm, Nomen Nescio wrote:
I couldn't stomach more than 20 minutes of either.
I'm increasingly of the view that while broadcasters would like
these programs to be more popular, their primary function is to fill
Australia content requirements as cheaply as possible, and if they
bomb on the first day, that's not a huge concern.
no MAFS and Bachie are hugely popular and money spinners for the
networks
Both are a load of shit,
try watching something worthwhile like Tokyo vice (SBS catchup)
keithr0 wrote:
try watching something worthwhile like Tokyo vice (SBS catchup)
I'll take a look
Yosemite Sam wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
try watching something worthwhile like Tokyo vice (SBS catchup)
I'll take a look
watched it last night. I don't like shows where you need to be reading
and watching at the same time,
so I won't bother with it.
also the eps start at number 5, so there's no knowledge of the storyline--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
or what has gone before.
On Mon, 06 Feb 2023 12:58:20 +1100, Yosemite Sam <felix@goaway.now> wrote:
Yosemite Sam wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
try watching something worthwhile like Tokyo vice (SBS catchup)
I'll take a look
watched it last night. I don't like shows where you need to be reading
and watching at the same time,
Me neither.
so I won't bother with it.
Me neither.
On 7/02/2023 3:10 am, Rod Speed wrote:
On Mon, 06 Feb 2023 12:58:20 +1100, Yosemite Sam <felix@goaway.now>
wrote:
Yosemite Sam wrote:Me neither.
keithr0 wrote:
try watching something worthwhile like Tokyo vice (SBS catchup)
I'll take a look
watched it last night. I don't like shows where you need to be reading >>> and watching at the same time,
so I won't bother with it.
Me neither.
If you can't be bothered to put the effort in,
go watch MAFS,
also the eps start at number 5, so there's noknowledge of the storyline
or what has gone before.
On Tue, 07 Feb 2023 20:46:12 +1100, keithr0 <user@account.invalid> wrote:
On 7/02/2023 3:10 am, Rod Speed wrote:
On Mon, 06 Feb 2023 12:58:20 +1100, Yosemite Sam <felix@goaway.now>
wrote:
Yosemite Sam wrote:aMe neither.
keithr0 wrote:
try watching something worthwhile like Tokyo vice (SBS catchup)
I'll take a look
watched it last night. I don't like shows where you need to be
reading and watching at the same time,
so I won't bother with it.aMe neither.
If you can't be bothered to put the effort in,
No point in doing that when that series isnt
anything special and involves that stupidiity.
go watch MAFS,
I never ever watch any shit like that.
Line of Duty leaves Tokyo Vice for dead
and doesnt involve the terminal stupidity of subtitles.
Tokyo isnt exactly notorious for a desperate crime scene.--
also the eps start at number 5, so there's no knowledge of the
storyline or what has gone before.
It is torrentable.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 01:49:58 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
10 files (20,373K bytes) |
| Messages: | 264,321 |