• When should you self-detrain

    From Marcus Potter@marcuspotter02@gmail.com to aus.rail on Sun Oct 27 15:26:47 2019
    From Newsgroup: aus.rail

    Hello, I would like to know when it is safer to self-detrain a train than to remain on board when there is no guard or driver available to ask for permission following a derailment or collision? By that I mean a scenario which has left the driver incapacitated and the guard is either incapacitated or no guard is present on board.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Matthew Geier@matthew@sleeper.apana.org.au to aus.rail on Sun Oct 27 19:08:06 2019
    From Newsgroup: aus.rail

    On Monday, 28 October 2019 09:26:48 UTC+11, Marcus Potter wrote:
    Hello, I would like to know when it is safer to self-detrain a train than to remain on board when there is no guard or driver available to ask for permission following a derailment or collision? By that I mean a scenario which has left the driver incapacitated and the guard is either incapacitated or no guard is present on board.
    Unless the train is on fire and causing imminent danger to your person its always better to stay put and wait for emergency services to assist. Even if the driver wasn't able to raise an alarm, track occupancy is monitored - alarms will be raised relatively quickly about the stopped train.
    If you hop out you expose your self to being hit by other trains that have not yet gotten the emergency stop radio call yet, fallen but still live power lines (if a derailment/collision), etc, etc.
    Even ignoring all that railway track is full of trip hazards.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sylvia Else@sylvia@email.invalid to aus.rail on Mon Oct 28 13:58:20 2019
    From Newsgroup: aus.rail

    On 28/10/2019 1:08 pm, Matthew Geier wrote:
    On Monday, 28 October 2019 09:26:48 UTC+11, Marcus Potter wrote:
    Hello, I would like to know when it is safer to self-detrain a
    train than to remain on board when there is no guard or driver
    available to ask for permission following a derailment or
    collision? By that I mean a scenario which has left the driver
    incapacitated and the guard is either incapacitated or no guard is
    present on board.


    Unless the train is on fire and causing imminent danger to your
    person its always better to stay put and wait for emergency services
    to assist. Even if the driver wasn't able to raise an alarm, track
    occupancy is monitored - alarms will be raised relatively quickly
    about the stopped train.

    It was quite a long time before the emergency services arrived at
    Waterfall. History is full of case where passengers died when one train crashed in the wreckage of another.

    If a train is on its side, then the track will no longer show as being occupied, and the train may also be fouling an adjacent line, while not showing that as occupied either.

    One would hope that control would notice that a train had gone missing,
    but it's anyone's guess how long it would take them to block the
    adjacent lines. Every time a serious accident occurs, there seems to be criticism in the subsequent accident report about the handling of the emergency.

    So a passenger in such a train might reasonably consider that departing
    both the train and the track quickly would be a good idea. Mind you, the emergency side door exits would now be on top, and a considerable
    distance from the ground.


    If you hop out you expose your self to being hit by other trains that
    have not yet gotten the emergency stop radio call yet, fallen but
    still live power lines (if a derailment/collision), etc, etc. Even
    ignoring all that railway track is full of trip hazards.



    People can and do die of heat exhaustion, and the authorities have shown
    a willingness to leave people in overheated carriages for extended
    periods of time, while they try to implement a solution that doesn't
    involve detraining the passengers.

    I think most people would be aware that most of the time there are only
    two tracks, and that on one side of the train there is no danger of
    being hit by another.

    Power lines can be looked for. Tripping hazards? I'll take my chances.

    Sylvia.


    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From news18@news18@woa.com.au to aus.rail on Mon Oct 28 13:52:12 2019
    From Newsgroup: aus.rail

    On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:58:20 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote:

    On 28/10/2019 1:08 pm, Matthew Geier wrote:
    On Monday, 28 October 2019 09:26:48 UTC+11, Marcus Potter wrote:
    Hello, I would like to know when it is safer to self-detrain a train
    than to remain on board when there is no guard or driver available to
    ask for permission following a derailment or collision? By that I mean
    a scenario which has left the driver incapacitated and the guard is
    either incapacitated or no guard is present on board.


    Unless the train is on fire and causing imminent danger to your person
    its always better to stay put and wait for emergency services to
    assist. Even if the driver wasn't able to raise an alarm, track
    occupancy is monitored - alarms will be raised relatively quickly about
    the stopped train.

    It was quite a long time before the emergency services arrived at
    Waterfall. History is full of case where passengers died when one train crashed in the wreckage of another.

    If a train is on its side, then the track will no longer show as being occupied, and the train may also be fouling an adjacent line, while not showing that as occupied either.

    One would hope that control would notice that a train had gone missing,

    somewhere on the internet is a picture of a the Broadmedow Control Room.
    Do you honestly thng some muggins going to notice one little light
    changing across a very large room?
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sylvia Else@sylvia@email.invalid to aus.rail on Tue Oct 29 12:30:52 2019
    From Newsgroup: aus.rail

    On 29/10/2019 12:52 am, news18 wrote:
    On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:58:20 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote:

    On 28/10/2019 1:08 pm, Matthew Geier wrote:
    On Monday, 28 October 2019 09:26:48 UTC+11, Marcus Potter wrote:
    Hello, I would like to know when it is safer to self-detrain a train
    than to remain on board when there is no guard or driver available to
    ask for permission following a derailment or collision? By that I mean >>>> a scenario which has left the driver incapacitated and the guard is
    either incapacitated or no guard is present on board.


    Unless the train is on fire and causing imminent danger to your person
    its always better to stay put and wait for emergency services to
    assist. Even if the driver wasn't able to raise an alarm, track
    occupancy is monitored - alarms will be raised relatively quickly about
    the stopped train.

    It was quite a long time before the emergency services arrived at
    Waterfall. History is full of case where passengers died when one train
    crashed in the wreckage of another.

    If a train is on its side, then the track will no longer show as being
    occupied, and the train may also be fouling an adjacent line, while not
    showing that as occupied either.

    One would hope that control would notice that a train had gone missing,

    somewhere on the internet is a picture of a the Broadmedow Control Room.
    Do you honestly thng some muggins going to notice one little light
    changing across a very large room?


    Depends whether the system highlights a missing train.

    Sylvia.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Matthew Geier@matthew@sleeper.apana.org.au to aus.rail on Mon Oct 28 23:34:10 2019
    From Newsgroup: aus.rail

    I've been on a train (charter) that made an unscheduled stop to allow some photographs at a disused platform.

    Within minutes, the driver got a radio call asking 'why are you over time in section ?'. (To which he answered 'I lost the air, all OK now').

    I'm sure the reaction in the control room was 'yea, right, you stopped at xxx didn't you'.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From news18@news18@woa.com.au to aus.rail on Wed Oct 30 12:48:08 2019
    From Newsgroup: aus.rail

    On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:30:52 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote:

    On 29/10/2019 12:52 am, news18 wrote:
    On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:58:20 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote:

    On 28/10/2019 1:08 pm, Matthew Geier wrote:
    On Monday, 28 October 2019 09:26:48 UTC+11, Marcus Potter wrote:
    Hello, I would like to know when it is safer to self-detrain a train >>>>> than to remain on board when there is no guard or driver available
    to ask for permission following a derailment or collision? By that I >>>>> mean a scenario which has left the driver incapacitated and the
    guard is either incapacitated or no guard is present on board.


    Unless the train is on fire and causing imminent danger to your
    person its always better to stay put and wait for emergency services
    to assist. Even if the driver wasn't able to raise an alarm, track
    occupancy is monitored - alarms will be raised relatively quickly
    about the stopped train.

    It was quite a long time before the emergency services arrived at
    Waterfall. History is full of case where passengers died when one
    train crashed in the wreckage of another.

    If a train is on its side, then the track will no longer show as being
    occupied, and the train may also be fouling an adjacent line, while
    not showing that as occupied either.

    One would hope that control would notice that a train had gone
    missing,

    somewhere on the internet is a picture of a the Broadmedow Control
    Room.
    Do you honestly thng some muggins going to notice one little light
    changing across a very large room?


    Depends whether the system highlights a missing train.

    Does it?

    Sylvia.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marcus Potter@potter4564@gmail.com to aus.rail on Fri May 29 13:51:44 2020
    From Newsgroup: aus.rail

    On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 6:34:12 AM UTC, Matthew Geier wrote:
    I've been on a train (charter) that made an unscheduled stop to allow some photographs at a disused platform.

    Within minutes, the driver got a radio call asking 'why are you over time in section ?'. (To which he answered 'I lost the air, all OK now').

    I'm sure the reaction in the control room was 'yea, right, you stopped at xxx didn't you'.

    What does "lost the air" mean?
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From news18@news18@woa.com.au to aus.rail on Sat May 30 01:07:51 2020
    From Newsgroup: aus.rail

    On Fri, 29 May 2020 13:51:44 -0700, Marcus Potter wrote:

    On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 6:34:12 AM UTC, Matthew Geier wrote:
    I've been on a train (charter) that made an unscheduled stop to allow
    some photographs at a disused platform.

    Within minutes, the driver got a radio call asking 'why are you over
    time in section ?'. (To which he answered 'I lost the air, all OK
    now').

    I'm sure the reaction in the control room was 'yea, right, you stopped
    at xxx didn't you'.

    What does "lost the air" mean?

    The air pipe that holds the brakes off lost pressure thus bringing the
    train to a stop. It is suppossed to be a feature of modern train safety, Westingouse system(?), where the "loco" has to apply pressure to a air
    line through out the whole trail before it can move. suppossed to prevent
    run away carriages if the train seperate into parts.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2