lindsay wrote
Noddy wrote
Buying bulk popcorn... :-)>
Lol :)
Tomorrow's going to be a great day :)
apparently, it all begins at 10.00am
Cint the Bint has already threatened a scorched earth policy where the
labor party will be rudderless for up to 30 days, 4 months out from an
election...
Surprisingly, havent a peep from Dictator Dan...
Yes. Sounds like they're going to totally implode, and I for one could
not be happier about that. Allen knows that being arseholed will end her political career, and she's the kind of cunt that if she goes down
she'll drag the whole lot of them with her.
Happy days!!
They are indeed. With any luck this will be the total and irremediable
end of the Labor party in Victoria :)
Rod Speed wrote
Noddy <me@home.com> wrote
According to the wife, sources from the department of Premier and
Cabinet have claimed that the only reason she resigned this morning
was in exchange for party approval for an as yet unnamed successor to
be given the job, and that successor is *not* Ben Carroll.
The party and them don't get to decide who replaces Allen if more
than Carroll chooses to run and he has already said that he will
You clearly have no idea how political leaders are picked.
Best you just keep quiet.
Rod Speed wrote
Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> wrote
Daryl wrote
Noddy wrote
Daryl wrote
Noddy wrote
It's going to get ugly, and the best part about that is that all >>>>>>> the Libs have to do is sit back and have it handed to them :)
It certainly looks like Labor is going to be ousted and not before >>>>>> time, the real unknown is how much of a difference ON will make or >>>>>> how big a margin the Coalition will have.
I think ON's pan has already flashed. Hanson is getting shit all
over her shoes every time she opens her racist gob, and their party >>>>> structure is a mess. I mean, they have *one* MP in Victoria, and
haven't even nominated a party leader here with 4 months till the
election.
They're useless :)
Sure seems that way, all smoke and mirrors with very little substance.
Well, Allen has resigned, it's official. Well, on 9 news anyway.
And its not just 9 news
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_656641bc-5409-4f0a-b2a9-d7d265554111
It will be interesting to see if they have
enough of a clue to not have a full contest
for the replacement this close to the election
apparently they don't, if the rumors of a contest from Sonya Kilkenny
are accurate
Axel <none@not.here> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> wrote
Daryl wrote
Noddy wrote
Daryl wrote
Noddy wrote
It's going to get ugly, and the best part about that is that
all the Libs have to do is sit back and have it handed to them :)
It certainly looks like Labor is going to be ousted and not
before time, the real unknown is how much of a difference ON
will make or how big a margin the Coalition will have.
I think ON's pan has already flashed. Hanson is getting shit all
over her shoes every time she opens her racist gob, and their
party structure is a mess. I mean, they have *one* MP in
Victoria, and haven't even nominated a party leader here with 4
months till the election.
They're useless :)
Sure seems that way, all smoke and mirrors with very little
substance.
Well, Allen has resigned, it's official. Well, on 9 news anyway.
And its not just 9 news
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_656641bc-5409-4f0a-b2a9-d7d265554111
It will be interesting to see if they have
enough of a clue to not have a full contest
for the replacement this close to the election
apparently they don't, if the rumors of a contest from Sonya Kilkenny
are accurate
Its not just a rumor, its a fact now
But it will be interesting to see if she gets monstered into changing
her mind or if those fuckwits actually are stupid enough to have the
whole shit fight so close to the election
I hope they do myself given that that would certainly make it much
harder to win the state election which would be a good thing
Xeno wrote
Axel wrote
Xeno wrote
Axel wrote
lindsay wrote
(from ABC news website)
Four months out from the state election, Premier Jacinta Allan is >>>>>> facing a leadership challenge.
Factional powerbrokers met on Sunday night to discuss whether Ms >>>>>> Allan maintains the support of the caucus, and agreed she does not.
What's next?
It is understood Ms Allan will be offered the opportunity to resign >>>>>> on Monday, and if she refuses, is expected to face a leadership
challenge on Tuesday.
Personally, I'd like her to hang on till the election, so I can
laugh at her as the leader of the biggest mess ever to ruin
Victoria.
yes I want to see her kicked out by Victorian voters
Her and Daniel Andrews need an appointment with a judge and jury. >>>>>> And a public stoning.
you bet!
I'll remind you that Victorians voted for their government.
https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/10203-victorian-state-voting-
intention-april-2026
I don't need reminding. we're all living with the consequences of that >>> stupid decision by Victorian voters. Hopefully, this time the
electorate will not be so stupid, or we're well and truly down the
gurgler!
If you look around you, there will be nothing better in sight. The Libs
are well and truly down the gurgler.
they're in the best position to govern since they've been in opposition
now that Jess Wilson is in charge
What's it been now, 12 years of Labor? If the Libs haven't managed to
stage a comeback by now after 12 years on the opposition benches, then
I see no future for them.
except the situation in Victoria is now so dire voters will grasp at any straw to be rid of this Labor govt
They have much deeper issues than what is apparent, especially since
Labor has been elected 3 times already and they aren't even polling
badly now.
check the latest polls
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2I also don't see a long term future for ON surviving as they are on the
politics of division.
Noddy <me@home.com> wrote
-aThe party and them don't get to decide who replaces Allen if more
than Carroll chooses to run and he has already said that he will
You clearly have no idea how political leaders are picked.
You have no fucking idea how victorian labour decides who will
be the leader if more than one chooses to stand for leadership
On 28/07/2026 11:24 am, Rod Speed wrote:
Noddy <me@home.com> wrote
-aThe party and them don't get to decide who replaces Allen if more
than Carroll chooses to run and he has already said that he will
You clearly have no idea how political leaders are picked.
You have no fucking idea how victorian labour decides who will
be the leader if more than one chooses to stand for leadership
*Jesus* you're a fucking moron. You've been posting on Usenet for what,
30 years now? And you're *still* as dumb as a dogshit sandwich.
Just fuck off back to wherever that other imbecile Felix dragged you in from....
Axel <none@not.here> wrote
Xeno wrote
Axel wrote
Xeno wrote
Axel wrote
lindsay wrote
(from ABC news website)
Four months out from the state election, Premier Jacinta Allan is >>>>>>> facing a leadership challenge.
Factional powerbrokers met on Sunday night to discuss whether Ms >>>>>>> Allan maintains the support of the caucus, and agreed she does not.
What's next?
It is understood Ms Allan will be offered the opportunity to
resign on Monday, and if she refuses, is expected to face a
leadership challenge on Tuesday.
Personally, I'd like her to hang on till the election, so I can >>>>>>> laugh at her as the leader of the biggest mess ever to ruin
Victoria.
yes I want to see her kicked out by Victorian voters
Her and Daniel Andrews need an appointment with a judge and jury. >>>>>>> And a public stoning.
you bet!
I'll remind you that Victorians voted for their government.
https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/10203-victorian-state-voting-
intention-april-2026
I don't need reminding. we're all living with the consequences of
that stupid decision by Victorian voters. Hopefully, this time the
electorate will not be so stupid, or we're well and truly down the
gurgler!
If you look around you, there will be nothing better in sight. The
Libs are well and truly down the gurgler.
they're in the best position to govern since they've been in
opposition now that Jess Wilson is in charge
Dunno given the stupid shit fight about Deeming
Tho its far from clear how many of the voters are even aware of that
What's it been now, 12 years of Labor? If the Libs haven't managed to
stage a comeback by now after 12 years on the opposition benches,
then I see no future for them.
except the situation in Victoria is now so dire voters will grasp at
any straw to be rid of this Labor govt
We'll see...
Axel wrote
Xeno wrote
Axel wrotethey're in the best position to govern since they've been in
Xeno wroteIf you look around you, there will be nothing better in sight. The
Axel wrote
lindsay wroteI'll remind you that Victorians voted for their government.
(from ABC news website)
Four months out from the state election, Premier Jacinta Allan is >>>>>>> facing a leadership challenge.
Factional powerbrokers met on Sunday night to discuss whether Ms >>>>>>> Allan maintains the support of the caucus, and agreed she does not. >>>>>>>
What's next?
It is understood Ms Allan will be offered the opportunity to
resign on Monday, and if she refuses, is expected to face a
leadership challenge on Tuesday.
Personally, I'd like her to hang on till the election, so I can >>>>>>> laugh at her as the leader of the biggest mess ever to ruin
Victoria.
yes I want to see her kicked out by Victorian voters
Her and Daniel Andrews need an appointment with a judge and jury. >>>>>>> And a public stoning.
you bet!
https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/10203-victorian-state-voting-
intention-april-2026
I don't need reminding. we're all living with the consequences of
that stupid decision by Victorian voters. Hopefully, this time the
electorate will not be so stupid, or we're well and truly down the
gurgler!
Libs are well and truly down the gurgler.
opposition now that Jess Wilson is in charge
What's it been now, 12 years of Labor? If the Libs haven't managed toexcept the situation in Victoria is now so dire voters will grasp at
stage a comeback by now after 12 years on the opposition benches, then >>> I see no future for them.
any straw to be rid of this Labor govt
They have much deeper issues than what is apparent, especially sincecheck the latest polls
Labor has been elected 3 times already and they aren't even polling
badly now.
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup Polls.>
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2I also don't see a long term future for ON surviving as they are on
the politics of division.
Rod Speed wrote
Noddy <me@home.com> wrote
The party and them don't get to decide who replaces Allen if more
than Carroll chooses to run and he has already said that he will
You clearly have no idea how political leaders are picked.
You have no fucking idea how victorian labour decides who will
be the leader if more than one chooses to stand for leadership
*Jesus* you're a fucking moron. You've been posting on Usenet for what,
30 years now? And you're *still* as dumb as a dogshit sandwich.
Just fuck off back to wherever that other imbecile Felix dragged you in from....
On 28/07/2026 11:24 am, Rod Speed wrote:
Noddy <me@home.com> wrote
-aThe party and them don't get to decide who replaces Allen if more
than Carroll chooses to run and he has already said that he will
You clearly have no idea how political leaders are picked.
You have no fucking idea how victorian labour decides who will
be the leader if more than one chooses to stand for leadership
*Jesus* you're a fucking moron. You've been posting on Usenet for what,
30 years now? And you're *still* as dumb as a dogshit sandwich.
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too >https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of
latest polling.
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian-electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit >https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian-electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit >https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian-
electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
This from the bloke who's been lying his arse off ever since he arrived
here *decades ago*.
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian-
electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup
Polls.
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian-electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Your photo is of 2025 polls, it's now 2026
Rod Speed wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup
Polls.
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian-
electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've noticed over the years that RM polls can differ significantly from what the others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup
Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian-
electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've noticed over
the years that RM polls can differ significantly from what the others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Daryl wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup
Polls.
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian-
electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as 19 if a >>>> state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've noticed
over the years that RM polls can differ significantly from what the
others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering Labor
won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong.
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but not one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red cunt - the
exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure would, so who are
they polling, where and in what numbers?
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup
Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian-
electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as 19 if a >>>> state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've noticed
over the years that RM polls can differ significantly from what the
others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering Labor
won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong.
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but not one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red cunt - the
exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure would, so who are
they polling, where and in what numbers?
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup
Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian-
electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as 19 if a >>>> state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've noticed
over the years that RM polls can differ significantly from what the
others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering Labor
won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong.
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but not
one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red cunt - the exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure would, so who are
they polling, where and in what numbers?
Clocky wrote:
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup >>>>>>> Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian-
electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as 19 if a >>>>> state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've noticed
over the years that RM polls can differ significantly from what the
others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering Labor
won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong.
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but not
one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red cunt - the
exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure would, so who are
they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
On 29/7/2026 9:57 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:No need! The FLCJC will decide that for you - like they've done with
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup >>>>>>>> Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/
IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of >>>>>> latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian-
electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the >>>>>> Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as 19 >>>>>> if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've noticed
over the years that RM polls can differ significantly from what the
others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering Labor
won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong.
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but not
one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red cunt - the
exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure would, so who are
they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
Clocky.
Clocky wrote:
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup >>>>>>> Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian-
electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as 19 if a >>>>> state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've noticed
over the years that RM polls can differ significantly from what the
others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering Labor
won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong.
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but not
one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red cunt - the
exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure would, so who are
they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
On 29/07/2026 7:57 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:You don't have to.
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup >>>>>>>> Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of >>>>>> latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian-
electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the >>>>>> Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as 19 >>>>>> if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've noticed
over the years that RM polls can differ significantly from what the
others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering
Labor won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong.
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but not
one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red cunt -
the exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure would, so
who are they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
On 29/07/2026 11:37 am, Xeno wrote:
No need to make anything up, he has made it clear where his sympathies lie.
On 29/7/2026 9:57 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:No need! The FLCJC will decide that for you - like they've done with
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup >>>>>>>>> Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/
IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of >>>>>>> latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian-
electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the >>>>>>> Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as 19 >>>>>>> if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in >>>>>>> politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've noticed >>>>> over the years that RM polls can differ significantly from what the >>>>> others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering
Labor won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong.
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but not
one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red cunt -
the exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure would, so
who are they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
Clocky.
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 7:57 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:You don't have to.
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup >>>>>>>>> Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/
IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of >>>>>>> latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian-
electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the >>>>>>> Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as 19 >>>>>>> if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in >>>>>>> politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've noticed >>>>> over the years that RM polls can differ significantly from what the >>>>> others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering
Labor won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong.
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but not
one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red cunt -
the exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure would, so
who are they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
you have no idea who I'm voting for so piss off
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 7:57 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:You don't have to.
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan Gallup >>>>>>>>> Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of >>>>>>> latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian-
electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the >>>>>>> Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as 19 >>>>>>> if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in >>>>>>> politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've noticed >>>>> over the years that RM polls can differ significantly from what the >>>>> others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering
Labor won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong.
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but not
one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red cunt -
the exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure would, so
who are they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
you have no idea who I'm voting for so piss off
On 29/7/2026 12:48 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
On 29/07/2026 11:37 am, Xeno wrote:
No need to make anything up, he has made it clear where his sympathies
On 29/7/2026 9:57 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:No need! The FLCJC will decide that for you - like they've done with
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan
Gallup Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong tooFrom what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is because of >>>>>>>> latest polling.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/
IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0 >>>>>>>
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian- >>>>>>>> electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in the >>>>>>>> Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as >>>>>>>> 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in >>>>>>>> politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've
noticed over the years that RM polls can differ significantly from >>>>>> what the others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering
Labor won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong.
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but not >>>>> one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red cunt -
the exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure would, so
who are they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
Clocky.
lie.
Sympathies, yes, vote, no.
On 29/7/2026 1:18 pm, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:Indeed, regardless of whatever voting intentions one telegraphs, what happens on polling day may be entirely different. Simply put, a lot of people seem to make up their minds as they walk into the polling booth.
On 29/07/2026 7:57 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:You don't have to.
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan
Gallup Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong tooFrom what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/
IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0 >>>>>>>
because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian- >>>>>>>> electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in >>>>>>>> the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as >>>>>>>> 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in >>>>>>>> politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've
noticed over the years that RM polls can differ significantly
from what the others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering
Labor won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong.
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but
not one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red
cunt - the exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure
would, so who are they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
you have no idea who I'm voting for so piss off
On 29/07/2026 11:18 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 7:57 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:You don't have to.
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan
Gallup Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is
because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian- >>>>>>>> electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in >>>>>>>> the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as >>>>>>>> 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in >>>>>>>> politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've
noticed over the years that RM polls can differ significantly
from what the others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering
Labor won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong.
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but
not one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red
cunt - the exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure
would, so who are they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
you have no idea who I'm voting for so piss off
You're not voting Green or Labor... and you are about as far right of politics as you can go without circling back. Now I genuinely believe
you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON given it's in your interest
to keep Medicare and the PBS which she would abolish
- so you're most likely to vote for LNP even though you lean much
further right than those clowns.
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 11:18 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 7:57 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:You don't have to.
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan >>>>>>>>>>> Gallup Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is
because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian- >>>>>>>>> electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 >>>>>>>>> in the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as >>>>>>>>> 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in >>>>>>>>> politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've
noticed over the years that RM polls can differ significantly
from what the others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering
Labor won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong. >>>>>>
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but
not one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red
cunt - the exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure
would, so who are they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
you have no idea who I'm voting for so piss off
You're not voting Green or Labor... and you are about as far right of
politics as you can go without circling back. Now I genuinely believe
you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON given it's in your
interest to keep Medicare and the PBS which she would abolish
I didn't know it was her intention to abolish those
- so you're most likely to vote for LNP even though you lean much
further right than those clowns.
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 11:18 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 7:57 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:You don't have to.
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan >>>>>>>>>>> Gallup Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is
because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian- >>>>>>>>> electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in >>>>>>>>> the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as >>>>>>>>> 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in >>>>>>>>> politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've
noticed over the years that RM polls can differ significantly
from what the others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering
Labor won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong. >>>>>>
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but
not one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red
cunt - the exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure
would, so who are they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
you have no idea who I'm voting for so piss off
You're not voting Green or Labor... and you are about as far right of
politics as you can go without circling back. Now I genuinely believe
you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON given it's in your interest
to keep Medicare and the PBS which she would abolish
I didn't know it was her intention to abolish those
Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 11:18 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 7:57 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:You don't have to.
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan >>>>>>>>>>>> Gallup Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is
because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian- >>>>>>>>>> electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 >>>>>>>>>> in the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as >>>>>>>>>> 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in >>>>>>>>>> politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've
noticed over the years that RM polls can differ significantly >>>>>>>> from what the others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering >>>>>>> Labor won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong. >>>>>>>
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but >>>>>>> not one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red
cunt - the exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure
would, so who are they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
you have no idea who I'm voting for so piss off
You're not voting Green or Labor... and you are about as far right of
politics as you can go without circling back. Now I genuinely believe
you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON given it's in your
interest to keep Medicare and the PBS which she would abolish
I didn't know it was her intention to abolish those
apparently not. seems clocky is stretching the truth somewhat.
worry clocky, she hasn't said anything about deporting clog wogs.
(afaik)-a :)
AI Overview
No, it is not One Nation's policy to completely abandon Medicare or the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), but the party has proposed major reviews and changes that critics argue could undermine them.
One Nation's Stated Positions
Medicare and PBS Support: The party states it wants to crack down on
fraud and misuse in Medicare and the PBS to save money, claiming
billions are lost annually.
Specific Proposals: Under its government waste reduction plans, One
Nation has proposed to review $3 billion worth of medications added to
the PBS during the pandemic and to abolish the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) by rolling its functions into the federal health department.
Criticisms and Concerns
The "Abandonment" Claim: Political opponents and patient advocacy groups have argued that reviewing pandemic-era PBS listings and targeting
health administration amounts to gutting or threatening affordable healthcare systems.
Expert Feedback: Health policy experts have criticized some of One
Nation's proposals as unfeasible or based on misunderstandings (such as noting the TGA is already part of the health department), warning that changes could cause administrative confusion or restrict access.
- so you're most likely to vote for LNP even though you lean much
further right than those clowns.
No, it is not One Nation's policy to completely abandon Medicare or the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), but the party has proposed major reviews and changes that critics argue could undermine them.
One Nation's Stated Positions
Medicare and PBS Support: The party states it wants to crack down on
fraud and misuse in Medicare and the PBS to save money, claiming
billions are lost annually.
Specific Proposals: Under its government waste reduction plans, One
Nation has proposed to review $3 billion worth of medications added to
the PBS during the pandemic
and to abolish the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) by rolling
its functions into the federal health department.
Criticisms and Concerns
The "Abandonment" Claim: Political opponents and patient advocacy groups have argued that reviewing pandemic-era PBS listings and targeting
health administration amounts to gutting or threatening affordable healthcare systems.
Expert Feedback: Health policy experts have criticized some of One
Nation's proposals as unfeasible or based on misunderstandings (such as noting the TGA is already part of the health department), warning that changes could cause administrative confusion or restrict access.
you have no idea who I'm voting for so piss off
You're not voting Green or Labor... and you are about as far right of politics as you can go without circling back. Now I genuinely believe
you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON given it's in your interest
to keep Medicare and the PBS which she would abolish - so you're most
likely to vote for LNP even though you lean much further right than
those clowns.
Now I genuinely believe you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON given it's in your interest to keep Medicare and the PBS which she would
abolish
Clocky wrote
Now I genuinely believe you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON
given it's in your interest to keep Medicare and the PBS which she
would abolish
I didn't know it was her intention to abolish those
Axel wrote
Clocky wrote
Now I genuinely believe you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON
given it's in your interest to keep Medicare and the PBS which she
would abolish
I didn't know it was her intention to abolish those
She said she would make cuts to the PBS in her press club speech
and you can bet that Medicare would follow.
There are now people dying in the US because they can no longer afford hundreds a month just for an asthma puffer thanks to cuts Trump has made which Hanson is modeling her policies on.
Axel wrote
Axel wrote
Clocky wrote
Now I genuinely believe you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON
given it's in your interest to keep Medicare and the PBS which she
would abolish
I didn't know it was her intention to abolish those
apparently not. seems clocky is stretching the truth somewhat.
Nope.
but don't
worry clocky, she hasn't said anything about deporting clog wogs.
(afaik) :)
If she ever got in government
it would be a very sad indictment on the people of this country. I'll likely deport myself :-)
AI Overview
No, it is not One Nation's policy to completely abandon Medicare or
the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), but the party has proposed
major reviews and changes that critics argue could undermine them.
One Nation's Stated Positions
Medicare and PBS Support: The party states it wants to crack down on
fraud and misuse in Medicare and the PBS to save money, claiming
billions are lost annually.
That's what Trump said before taking the axe to everything.
In case you haven't noticed, Hanson is talking the same talk Trump did
and you can bet she will walk the same walk.
Specific Proposals: Under its government waste reduction plans, One
Nation has proposed to review $3 billion worth of medications added to
the PBS during the pandemic and to abolish the Therapeutic Goods
Administration (TGA) by rolling its functions into the federal health
department.
Criticisms and Concerns
The "Abandonment" Claim: Political opponents and patient advocacy
groups have argued that reviewing pandemic-era PBS listings and
targeting health administration amounts to gutting or threatening
affordable healthcare systems.
Expert Feedback: Health policy experts have criticized some of One
Nation's proposals as unfeasible or based on misunderstandings (such as
noting the TGA is already part of the health department), warning that
changes could cause administrative confusion or restrict access.
So is this a plank you would want to walk down? Yes or no?
apparently not. seems clocky is stretching the truth somewhat. but don't worry clocky, she hasn't said anything about deporting clog wogs.
(afaik)-a :)
AI Overview
Axel wrote
No, it is not One Nation's policy to completely abandon Medicare or the
Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), but the party has proposed major
reviews and changes that critics argue could undermine them.
I.E. rip the guts out of them.
One Nation's Stated Positions
Medicare and PBS Support: The party states it wants to crack down on
fraud and misuse in Medicare and the PBS to save money, claiming
billions are lost annually.
Straight out of the Trump playbook
Specific Proposals: Under its government waste reduction plans, One
Nation has proposed to review $3 billion worth of medications added to
the PBS during the pandemic
Also from an AI:
A political proposal by One Nation seeks to review $3 billion worth of medications added to Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) during the COVID-19 pandemic. This proposal forms part of a broader
policy document aimed at cutting federal government spending.Context of
the Proposal Targeted Figure: The $3 billion figure specifically
highlights treatments and expanded listings approved and subsidized
during the pandemic years.
Impacted Medicines: Potentially affected items include vital therapies
like heart failure medications, treatments for severe childhood
epilepsy, and specific oncology or dermatology drugs.
That sounds good - not!
and to abolish the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) by rolling
its functions into the federal health department.
It is already part of the health department.
Criticisms and Concerns
The "Abandonment" Claim: Political opponents and patient advocacy
groups have argued that reviewing pandemic-era PBS listings and
targeting health administration amounts to gutting or threatening
affordable healthcare systems.
Expert Feedback: Health policy experts have criticized some of One
Nation's proposals as unfeasible or based on misunderstandings (such as
noting the TGA is already part of the health department), warning that
changes could cause administrative confusion or restrict access.
Probably Gina thinks that she is paying too much tax, so the rest of us need to economise.
Axel wrote
apparently not. seems clocky is stretching the truth somewhat. but
don't worry clocky, she hasn't said anything about deporting clog wogs.
(afaik) :)
AI Overview
Idle Question: If this "AI Overview" is, as I understand it, the product
of an aggregation of sources, how credible then is this overview if a
high %age of the sources are irrationally biased?
On 29/07/2026 12:54 pm, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 11:18 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 7:57 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:You don't have to.
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan >>>>>>>>>>>> Gallup Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>>>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is
because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian- >>>>>>>>>> electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 >>>>>>>>>> in the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many >>>>>>>>>> as 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic
shift in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG? >>>>>>>>> rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've
noticed over the years that RM polls can differ significantly >>>>>>>> from what the others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering >>>>>>> Labor won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong. >>>>>>>
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but >>>>>>> not one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red
cunt - the exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure
would, so who are they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
you have no idea who I'm voting for so piss off
You're not voting Green or Labor... and you are about as far right
of politics as you can go without circling back. Now I genuinely
believe you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON given it's in
your interest to keep Medicare and the PBS which she would abolish
I didn't know it was her intention to abolish those
She said she would make cuts to the PBS in her press club speech and
you can bet that Medicare would follow. There are now people dying in
the US because they can no longer afford hundreds a month just for an
asthma puffer thanks to cuts Trump has made which Hanson is modeling
her policies on.
But if that's the kind of Australia you want, by all means vote ON -
but don't act surprised if it comes back to bite you in the arse as it
has Trump voters in the US.
Axel wrote:
apparently not. seems clocky is stretching the truth somewhat. but
don't worry clocky, she hasn't said anything about deporting clog
wogs. (afaik)-a :)
AI Overview
Idle Question: If this "AI Overview" is, as I understand it, the
product of an aggregation of sources, how credible then is this
overview if a high %age of the sources are irrationally biased?
Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> wrote
Axel wrote
No, it is not One Nation's policy to completely abandon Medicare or
the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), but the party has proposed
major reviews and changes that critics argue could undermine them.
I.E. rip the guts out of them.
Nothing even remotely like that https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_45113d88-4076-4b6d-b2c8-7fc4ca803251
One Nation's Stated Positions
Medicare and PBS Support: The party states it wants to crack down on
fraud and misuse in Medicare and the PBS to save money, claiming
billions are lost annually.
Straight out of the Trump playbook
Bullshit
Specific Proposals: Under its government waste reduction plans, One
Nation has proposed to review $3 billion worth of medications added
to the PBS during the pandemic
Also from an AI:
A political proposal by One Nation seeks to review $3 billion worth of
medications added to Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS)
during the COVID-19 pandemic. This proposal forms part of a broader
policy document aimed at cutting federal government spending.Context
of the Proposal Targeted Figure: The $3 billion figure specifically
highlights treatments and expanded listings approved and subsidized
during the pandemic years.
Which is because she has stupidly bought RFK jr's
stupidity about retrovirus antivirus against covid
Impacted Medicines: Potentially affected items include vital therapies
like heart failure medications, treatments for severe childhood
epilepsy, and specific oncology or dermatology drugs.
She has never said that
That sounds good - not!
and to abolish the Therapeutic Goods-a Administration (TGA) by rolling
its functions into the federal health department.
It is already part of the health department.
Criticisms and Concerns
The "Abandonment" Claim: Political opponents and patient advocacy
groups have argued that reviewing pandemic-era PBS listings and
targeting health administration amounts to gutting or threatening
affordable healthcare systems.
-aExpert Feedback: Health policy experts have criticized some of One
Nation's proposals as unfeasible or based on misunderstandings (such
as noting the TGA is already part of the health department), warning
that changes could cause administrative confusion or restrict access.
Probably Gina thinks that she is paying too much tax, so the rest of
us need to economise.
More of your mindless bullshit
Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> wrote
Now I genuinely believe you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON
given it's in your interest to keep Medicare and the PBS which she
would abolish
No she would not, in fact not only would she support both, she
would improve both if she ever got any say on either of them
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_45113d88-4076-4b6d-b2c8-7fc4ca803251
Simply put, a lot of people seem to make up their minds as they
walk into the polling booth.
alvey wrote:
Axel wrote:
apparently not. seems clocky is stretching the truth somewhat. but
don't worry clocky, she hasn't said anything about deporting clog
wogs. (afaik)-a :)
AI Overview
Idle Question: If this "AI Overview" is, as I understand it, the
product of an aggregation of sources, how credible then is this
overview if a high %age of the sources are irrationally biased?
what's the likelihood of the majority of world wide sources being irrationally biased? but, as I understand it, AI rejects sources that
lack credibility or verification
On 29/07/2026 6:50 pm, Axel wrote:
alvey wrote:How do they know?
Axel wrote:
apparently not. seems clocky is stretching the truth somewhat. but
don't worry clocky, she hasn't said anything about deporting clog
wogs. (afaik)-a :)
AI Overview
Idle Question: If this "AI Overview" is, as I understand it, the
product of an aggregation of sources, how credible then is this
overview if a high %age of the sources are irrationally biased?
what's the likelihood of the majority of world wide sources being
irrationally biased? but, as I understand it, AI rejects sources that
lack credibility or verification
Keithr0 wrote:
On 29/07/2026 6:50 pm, Axel wrote:
alvey wrote:How do they know?
Axel wrote:
apparently not. seems clocky is stretching the truth somewhat. but
don't worry clocky, she hasn't said anything about deporting clog
wogs. (afaik)-a :)
AI Overview
Idle Question: If this "AI Overview" is, as I understand it, the
product of an aggregation of sources, how credible then is this
overview if a high %age of the sources are irrationally biased?
what's the likelihood of the majority of world wide sources being
irrationally biased? but, as I understand it, AI rejects sources that
lack credibility or verification
it evaluates everything it finds on the matter
alvey wrote:
Axel wrote:
apparently not. seems clocky is stretching the truth somewhat. but
don't worry clocky, she hasn't said anything about deporting clog
wogs. (afaik)-a :)
AI Overview
Idle Question: If this "AI Overview" is, as I understand it, the
product of an aggregation of ignored, how credible then is this
overview if a high %age of the sources are irrationally biased?
what's the likelihood of the majority of world wide sources being irrationally biased?
but, as I understand it, AI rejects sources that
lack credibility or verification
Keithr0 wrote:
On 29/07/2026 6:50 pm, Axel wrote:
alvey wrote:How do they know?
Axel wrote:
apparently not. seems clocky is stretching the truth somewhat. but
don't worry clocky, she hasn't said anything about deporting clog
wogs. (afaik)-a :)
AI Overview
Idle Question: If this "AI Overview" is, as I understand it, the
product of an aggregation of sources, how credible then is this
overview if a high %age of the sources are irrationally biased?
what's the likelihood of the majority of world wide sources being
irrationally biased? but, as I understand it, AI rejects sources that
lack credibility or verification
it evaluates everything it finds on the matter
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 11:18 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 7:57 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:You don't have to.
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan >>>>>>>>>>> Gallup Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong tooFrom what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/
IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0 >>>>>>>>
because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/
IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0 >>>>>>>>
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian- >>>>>>>>> electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in >>>>>>>>> the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as >>>>>>>>> 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift in >>>>>>>>> politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/
IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've
noticed over the years that RM polls can differ significantly
from what the others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering
Labor won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong. >>>>>>
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but
not one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red
cunt - the exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure
would, so who are they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
you have no idea who I'm voting for so piss off
You're not voting Green or Labor... and you are about as far right of
politics as you can go without circling back. Now I genuinely believe
you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON given it's in your interest
to keep Medicare and the PBS which she would abolish
I didn't know it was her intention to abolish those
- so you're most likely to vote for LNP even though you lean much
further right than those clowns.
On 29/07/2026 8:12 pm, Axel wrote:
Keithr0 wrote:You really believe that?
On 29/07/2026 6:50 pm, Axel wrote:
alvey wrote:How do they know?
Axel wrote:
apparently not. seems clocky is stretching the truth somewhat.
but don't worry clocky, she hasn't said anything about deporting
clog wogs. (afaik)-a :)
AI Overview
Idle Question: If this "AI Overview" is, as I understand it, the
product of an aggregation of sources, how credible then is this
overview if a high %age of the sources are irrationally biased?
what's the likelihood of the majority of world wide sources being
irrationally biased? but, as I understand it, AI rejects sources
that lack credibility or verification
it evaluates everything it finds on the matter
Rod Speed wroteBullshit
Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> wroteAll that she has said is that she won't abolish them
Axel wroteNothing even remotely like that
No, it is not One Nation's policy to completely abandon Medicare or >>>> the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), but the party has proposed >>>> major reviews and changes that critics argue could undermine them.I.E. rip the guts out of them.
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_45113d88-4076-4b6d-b2c8-7fc4ca803251
(it would be political suicide to do so), that doesn't mean that she > won't drastically reduce them.She has never said anything like that
Irrelevant to whether Hanson has said anything like that aboutExactly what Trump did with DOGE claim that there is waste and fraud > without evidence.BullshitOne Nation's Stated PositionsStraight out of the Trump playbook
Medicare and PBS Support: The party states it wants to crack down on >>>> fraud and misuse in Medicare and the PBS to save money, claiming >>>> billions are lost annually.
Bullshit with vaccination in general and scrapping the CDCShe seems to have bought all of his stupidities.Which is because she has stupidly bought RFK jr'sSpecific Proposals: Under its government waste reduction plans, One >>>> Nation has proposed to review $3 billion worth of medications added >>>> to the PBS during the pandemicAlso from an AI:
A political proposal by One Nation seeks to review $3 billion worth of >>> medications added to Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) >>> during the COVID-19 pandemic. This proposal forms part of a broader >>> policy document aimed at cutting federal government spending.Context >>> of the Proposal Targeted Figure: The $3 billion figure specifically >>> highlights treatments and expanded listings approved and subsidized >>> during the pandemic years.
stupidity about retrovirus antivirus against covid
That is nothing she actually saidRead the word "Potentially"Impacted Medicines: Potentially affected items include vital therapies >>> like heart failure medications, treatments for severe childhood >>> epilepsy, and specific oncology or dermatology drugs.She has never said that
Same old fuckwit pom, never had a fucking clueSame old speed, you haven't progressed in 30 years.That sounds good - not!More of your mindless bullshit
and to abolish the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) by rolling >>>> its functions into the federal health department.It is already part of the health department.
Criticisms and ConcernsProbably Gina thinks that she is paying too much tax, so the rest of >>> us need to economise.
The "Abandonment" Claim: Political opponents and patient advocacy >>>> groups have argued that reviewing pandemic-era PBS listings and >>>> targeting health administration amounts to gutting or threatening >>>> affordable healthcare systems.
Expert Feedback: Health policy experts have criticized some of One >>>> Nation's proposals as unfeasible or based on misunderstandings (such >>>> as noting the TGA is already part of the health department), warning >>>> that changes could cause administrative confusion or restrict access.
On 29/7/2026 2:54 pm, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 11:18 am, Axel wrote:I didn't know it was her intention to abolish those
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 7:57 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:You don't have to.
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan >>>>>>>>>>>> Gallup Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong tooFrom what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is >>>>>>>>>> because of
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/
IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0 >>>>>>>>>
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/
IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0 >>>>>>>>>
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian- >>>>>>>>>> electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 in >>>>>>>>>> the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many as >>>>>>>>>> 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic shift >>>>>>>>>> in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/
IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0 >>>>>>>>
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've
noticed over the years that RM polls can differ significantly >>>>>>>> from what the others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering >>>>>>> Labor won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong. >>>>>>>
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but >>>>>>> not one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red >>>>>>> cunt - the exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure >>>>>>> would, so who are they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
you have no idea who I'm voting for so piss off
You're not voting Green or Labor... and you are about as far right of
politics as you can go without circling back. Now I genuinely believe
you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON given it's in your interest >>> to keep Medicare and the PBS which she would abolish
Right wing candidates have long made it obvious that the PBS and
Medicare are anathema to them. Nothing new here.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2- so you're most likely to vote for LNP even though you lean much
further right than those clowns.
Xeno wrote
Simply put, a lot of people seem to make up their minds as they walk
into the polling booth.
Probably too lazy to think about the consequences of their vote.
Axel wrote
alvey wrote
Axel wrote
apparently not. seems clocky is stretching the truth somewhat. but
don't worry clocky, she hasn't said anything about deporting clog
wogs. (afaik) :)
AI Overview
Idle Question: If this "AI Overview" is, as I understand it, the
product of an aggregation of sources, how credible then is this
overview if a high %age of the sources are irrationally biased?
what's the likelihood of the majority of world wide sources being
irrationally biased? but, as I understand it, AI rejects sources that
lack credibility or verification
How do they know?
Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> wrote
Axel wrote
Axel wrote
Clocky wrote
-aNow I genuinely believe you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON >>>>> given it's in your interest to keep Medicare and the PBS which she
would abolish
I didn't know it was her intention to abolish those
apparently not. seems clocky is stretching the truth somewhat.
In fact getting what she proposes completely wrong
Nope.
Yep
-a but don't
worry clocky, she hasn't said anything about deporting clog wogs.
(afaik)-a :)
She wants to deport all immigrants ;(
If she ever got in government
Not going to happen
it would be a very sad indictment on the people of this country. I'll
likely deport myself :-)
AI Overview
-aNo, it is not One Nation's policy to completely abandon Medicare or
the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), but the party has proposed
major reviews and changes that critics argue could undermine them.
-aOne Nation's Stated Positions
Medicare and PBS Support: The party states it wants to crack down on
fraud and misuse in Medicare and the PBS to save money, claiming
billions are lost annually.
That's what Trump said before taking the axe to everything.
He hasn't taken the axe to everything
In fact he has forced their system to only pay the lowest price
that the drug companys have agreed to charge anywhere in the
world, which in many cases the price the PBS has negotiated here
In case you haven't noticed, Hanson is talking the same talk Trump did
She is doing nothing of the sort with Medicare and the PBS
and you can bet she will walk the same walk.
Fantasy
Specific Proposals: Under its government waste reduction plans, One
Nation has proposed to review $3 billion worth of medications added
to the PBS during the pandemic and to abolish the Therapeutic Goods
Administration (TGA) by rolling its functions into the federal health
department.
-aCriticisms and Concerns
The "Abandonment" Claim: Political opponents and patient advocacy
groups have argued that reviewing pandemic-era PBS listings and
targeting health administration amounts to gutting or threatening
affordable healthcare systems.
-aExpert Feedback: Health policy experts have criticized some of One
Nation's proposals as unfeasible or based on misunderstandings (such
as noting the TGA is already part of the health department), warning
that changes could cause administrative confusion or restrict access.
So is this a plank you would want to walk down? Yes or no?
You don't get to demand a yes or no response
alvey <Factman@gmail.com> wrote
Axel wrote
-aapparently not. seems clocky is stretching the truth somewhat. but
don't worry clocky, she hasn't said anything about deporting clog
wogs. (afaik)-a :)
-aAI Overview
Idle Question: If this "AI Overview" is, as I understand it, the
product of an aggregation of sources, how credible then is this
overview if a high %age of the sources are irrationally biased?
You are free to check the sources it cites with that excellent AI
And it actually cites what she has actually said about those issues--
and you are also free to check if she actually said that too
Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> wrote
Axel wrote
Clocky wrote
Now I genuinely believe you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON
given it's in your interest to keep Medicare and the PBS which she
would abolish
-aI didn't know it was her intention to abolish those
She said she would make cuts to the PBS in her press club speech
No she did not,
Rod Speed wrote
Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> wrote
Axel wrote
Axel wrote
Clocky wrote
Now I genuinely believe you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON >>>>>> given it's in your interest to keep Medicare and the PBS which she >>>>>> would abolish
I didn't know it was her intention to abolish those
apparently not. seems clocky is stretching the truth somewhat.
In fact getting what she proposes completely wrong
Nope.
Yep
Nope.
but don't
worry clocky, she hasn't said anything about deporting clog wogs.
(afaik) :)
She wants to deport all immigrants ;(
If she ever got in government
Not going to happen
Agreed.
it would be a very sad indictment on the people of this country. I'll
likely deport myself :-)
AI Overview
No, it is not One Nation's policy to completely abandon Medicare or >>>> the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), but the party has proposed >>>> major reviews and changes that critics argue could undermine them.
One Nation's Stated Positions
Medicare and PBS Support: The party states it wants to crack down on >>>> fraud and misuse in Medicare and the PBS to save money, claiming
billions are lost annually.
That's what Trump said before taking the axe to everything.
He hasn't taken the axe to everything
Wrong.
In fact he has forced their system to only pay the lowest price
that the drug companys have agreed to charge anywhere in the
world, which in many cases the price the PBS has negotiated here
In case you haven't noticed, Hanson is talking the same talk Trump did
She is doing nothing of the sort with Medicare and the PBS
and you can bet she will walk the same walk.
Fantasy
She's trumpeted the same rhetoric
and she's too stupid to have her own ideas.
Specific Proposals: Under its government waste reduction plans, One
Nation has proposed to review $3 billion worth of medications added
to the PBS during the pandemic and to abolish the Therapeutic Goods
Administration (TGA) by rolling its functions into the federal health >>>> department.
Have fun explaining why people are dying because they can no longer
afford basic medications now.
Criticisms and Concerns
The "Abandonment" Claim: Political opponents and patient advocacy
groups have argued that reviewing pandemic-era PBS listings and
targeting health administration amounts to gutting or threatening
affordable healthcare systems.
Expert Feedback: Health policy experts have criticized some of One
Nation's proposals as unfeasible or based on misunderstandings (such >>>> as noting the TGA is already part of the health department), warning >>>> that changes could cause administrative confusion or restrict access.
So is this a plank you would want to walk down? Yes or no?
You don't get to demand a yes or no response
It's not a demand, fool.
Rod Speed wrote
Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> wrote
Axel wrote
Clocky wrote
Now I genuinely believe you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON >>>>> given it's in your interest to keep Medicare and the PBS which she >>>>> would abolish
I didn't know it was her intention to abolish those
She said she would make cuts to the PBS in her press club speech
No she did not,
Yes, she did.
<snip AI rubbish>
On Wed, 29 Jul 2026 21:41:20 +1000, Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
On 29/7/2026 2:54 pm, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 11:18 am, Axel wrote:-aI didn't know it was her intention to abolish those
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 7:57 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:You don't have to.
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gallup Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong tooFrom what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is >>>>>>>>>>> because of
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/ >>>>>>>>>>>> IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0 >>>>>>>>>>
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/
IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0 >>>>>>>>>>
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian- >>>>>>>>>>> electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 >>>>>>>>>>> in the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many >>>>>>>>>>> as 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic >>>>>>>>>>> shift in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/
IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0 >>>>>>>>>
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've >>>>>>>>> noticed over the years that RM polls can differ significantly >>>>>>>>> from what the others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering >>>>>>>> Labor won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more wrong. >>>>>>>>
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but >>>>>>>> not one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red >>>>>>>> cunt - the exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure >>>>>>>> would, so who are they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
you have no idea who I'm voting for so piss off
You're not voting Green or Labor... and you are about as far right
of politics as you can go without circling back. Now I genuinely
believe you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON given it's in
your interest to keep Medicare and the PBS which she would abolish
Right wing candidates have long made it obvious that the PBS and
Medicare are anathema to them. Nothing new here.
Hanson hasn't done that and neither have the Libs and Nats
On 29/07/2026 4:47 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> wrote
Now I genuinely believe you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON
given it's in your interest to keep Medicare and the PBS which she
would abolish
No she would not, in fact not only would she support both, she
would improve both if she ever got any say on either of them
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_45113d88-4076-4b6d-b2c8-7fc4ca803251
We don't need speed here, just connect grok directly to the thread, and
cut out the middle man.
Rod Speed wrote
Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> wrote
On 29/7/2026 2:54 pm, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 11:18 am, Axel wrote:I didn't know it was her intention to abolish those
Clocky wrote:
On 29/07/2026 7:57 am, Axel wrote:
Clocky wrote:You don't have to.
On 28/07/2026 5:41 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 28/7/2026 3:42 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
The only one I have a modicum of faith in are the Morgan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gallup Polls.>
It got this one completely wrong too
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> IMG_3651.JPG?
rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0
From what I see this Victorian Labor Party schlimazel is >>>>>>>>>>>> because of
latest polling.
Yes, but this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/
IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0 >>>>>>>>>>>
<https://www.afr.com/politics/leaked-polling-flags-victorian- >>>>>>>>>>>> electoral-chaos-20260715-p60fiu>
https://tinyurl.com/4sxfu4bf
Labor could be reduced to just 25 seats and the Coalition 28 >>>>>>>>>>>> in the
Victorian parliament while One Nation could pick up as many >>>>>>>>>>>> as 19 if a
state election were held today, underscoring the seismic >>>>>>>>>>>> shift in
politics ahead of the November state poll.
And this proves that polls are complete bullshit
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/
IMG_3651.JPG? rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&st=4roeb1fu&dl=0 >>>>>>>>>>
Interesting that 4 out of those 10 were by Roy Morgan, I've >>>>>>>>>> noticed over the years that RM polls can differ significantly >>>>>>>>>> from what the others say.
At best the polls are a rough guide.
Even a rough guide would have predicted a Labor win considering >>>>>>>>> Labor won in a landslide. The polls couldn't have been more >>>>>>>>> wrong.
I'm seeing a lot of ON being ahead or on par in polls too - but >>>>>>>>> not one person I've asked has said they would vote for the red >>>>>>>>> cunt - the exception being felix in here and I'm not even sure >>>>>>>>> would, so who are they polling, where and in what numbers?
I've not said anything about my voting intentions
you have no idea who I'm voting for so piss off
You're not voting Green or Labor... and you are about as far right >>>>> of politics as you can go without circling back. Now I genuinely
believe you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON given it's in
your interest to keep Medicare and the PBS which she would abolish
Right wing candidates have long made it obvious that the PBS and
Medicare are anathema to them. Nothing new here.
Hanson hasn't done that and neither have the Libs and Nats
Hanson would if she got the chance -
but she'll never announce it as policybefore an election for obvious reasons.
Keithr0 wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> wrote
Now I genuinely believe you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON
given it's in your interest to keep Medicare and the PBS which she
would abolish
No she would not, in fact not only would she support both, she
would improve both if she ever got any say on either of them
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_45113d88-4076-4b6d-b2c8-7fc4ca803251
We don't need speed here, just connect grok directly to the thread,
and cut out the middle man.
Nobody has ever needed Speed anywhere, it's just imposed itself
uninvited.
On 29/07/2026 6:00 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
On 29/07/2026 4:47 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> wrote
Now I genuinely believe you wouldn't be retarded enough to vote ON
given it's in your interest to keep Medicare and the PBS which she
would abolish
No she would not, in fact not only would she support both, she
would improve both if she ever got any say on either of them
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_45113d88-4076-4b6d-b2c8-7fc4ca803251
We don't need speed here, just connect grok directly to the thread,
and cut out the middle man.
Nobody has ever needed Speed anywhere, it's just imposed itself
uninvited.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 52:27:47 |
| Calls: | 1,101 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 1,339 |
| Messages: | 276,091 |
