• Re: Sunday Supper

    From Clawed Dallas@ow@hy.ee to rec.food.cooking,aus.politics,alt.food.vegan on Mon Jul 27 12:11:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: aus.politics

    On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 16:14:16 GMT
    ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net <user4742@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
    Clawed Dallas <ow@hy.ee> posted:

    On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 03:09:22 GMT
    ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net <user4742@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    Nicolas Edme Restif de La Bretonne <restif@invalid.invalid>
    posted:
    On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 02:19:33 GMT, ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net <user4742@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> posted:

    We grilled a nice rib eye steak on the gas grill.

    It was a grilled Hebrew National beef (of course) hot dog
    here.

    A bit extra tortured during slaughter, you mean?


    I don't know I wasn't there. But if animals are not slaughtered
    for meat and other by-products they would overpopulate and die of starvation. Animals know nothing of birth control, all they do is
    eat and reproduce.


    Generally true, albeit when we farm raise them their proclivities
    for reproduction get managed tightly.


    Yes.

    ~
    That is called animal husbandry and is scriptural in origin: https://www.facebook.com/aigkenham/posts/god-gave-man-dominion-over-creation-genesis-126-including-over-the-animalsthis-d/1372132797606905/
    God gave man dominion over creation (Genesis 1:26), including over the animals. This dominion does not mean we can deliberately abuse, neglect, or harm creation, but rather, werCOre to use what God has made for our good and his glory.
    In Genesis 1:29rCo30, God told man to eat plants/fruits. But in Genesis 9:3, after the flood, God said we could eat all things (plants and animals).
    Animal rights groups really want animals to have dominion over man. Yet, ironically, most would claim that man is just an animal. So if they want equal rights for animals, what rights should humans have if they believe man is just an evolved animal?
    ItrCOs all inconsistent!
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Clawed Dallas@ow@hy.ee to rec.food.cooking,aus.general,aus.politics,alt.food.vegan on Mon Jul 27 12:39:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: aus.politics

    On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 04:23:53 +1000
    Nicolas Edme Restif de La Bretonne <restif@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 16:12:51 GMT, ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net <user4742@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:


    Nicolas Edme Restif de La Bretonne <restif@invalid.invalid> posted:

    On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 03:09:22 GMT, ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net
    <user4742@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    I don't know I wasn't there. But if animals are not slaughtered
    for meat and other by-products they would overpopulate and die of
    starvation. Animals know nothing of birth control, all they do is
    eat and reproduce.

    That's bizarre logic. Do you really think all those cows would be
    there waiting to be slaughtered if youse weren't going to eat them
    all?

    Do you think cows, deer, moose, goats, etc. would hold a meeting and
    all agreed not to breed as they know they'd starve to death due to
    over grazing? In the wild there are predators such as wolves,
    mountain lions, and bears that help keep the wild herds under
    control and prevent over grazing. In the settled areas there are
    farms and ranches that keep the domestic animals under control and
    benefit from the products those animals produce while alive and
    after death.

    So in short, you say: It's a good thing we eat cows, otherwise there
    would be way too many of them.

    Are you doing your part to eat blow flies, Renfield?

    Because Oztardia is freaking lousy with them.


    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/QuWbQegO1-E?feature=share


    But the truth is: The reason why there are so many cows is that we
    breed them because we eat them.

    Just as we've done to poor old Mr. Corn, right Oztard?




    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Clawed Dallas@ow@hy.ee to rec.food.cooking,aus.politics on Wed Jul 29 08:39:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: aus.politics

    On Wed, 29 Jul 2026 05:07:23 GMT
    ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net <user4742@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    Nicolas Edme Restif de La Bretonne <restif@invalid.invalid> posted:

    On 29 Jul 2026 02:08:42 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
    <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 2026-07-27, Nicolas Edme Restif de La Bretonne ><restif@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    But the truth is: The reason why there are so many cows is that
    we breed them because we eat them.

    Which brings up the deep, deep philosophical question.
    Would you like to be alive for a little while or never been born
    at all?

    If I'm never born, I won't be suffering either.

    But what surprises me the most is that Joan thinks we're doing the
    planet a favour by eating all these animals that would otherwise overpopulate the planet.


    You'd rather see them starve to death for lack of grazing area than
    eat them??

    ~

    He's to busy hybridizing new strains of veggies to torture and eat...

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From State of Jefferson Motorless Pool@no@new.scum to rec.food.cooking,aus.general,aus.politics on Wed Aug 5 14:23:28 2026
    From Newsgroup: aus.politics

    On Thu, 06 Aug 2026 04:20:02 +1000
    Uncle Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Wed, 05 Aug 2026 17:32:36 GMT, dsi1
    <user4746@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    Uncle Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> posted:

    On Wed, 05 Aug 2026 10:52:36 GMT, dsi1
    <user4746@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    Cindy Hamilton <chamilton5280@invalid.com> posted:

    On 2026-08-03, dsi1 <user4746@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    Most people on this planet don't have a dessert course during
    a meal. Of course, I'm talking about the Chinese.

    The Chinese are not "most people on this planet". Population
    of China is 1.41 billion; world population is 8.3 billion.
    China isn't even close to half.

    My son went to see this comic tonight. It was an Asian
    comedyfest. I think the guy is funny but I'm never going to stick
    my head in a concert hall again.

    So when you're wrong you just change the topic. Does that mean you
    saved your face or does it only make you look more wrong?

    It works for uncle Bruce, don't it?

    Does he change the topic when he's wrong?


    Going 3rd person on yourself again, trollass oztard?

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2