let slip she doesn't really care about little Aussie battlers
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wroteI did and that's what she said
let slip she doesn't really care about little Aussie battlersAnd you like most listened to her speech?
Or reading the lobbyist run fakenews media rant?Complete and utter pig ignorant bullshit with the ABC
"Our" Media and Major parties are run by lobbyists
Lobbyists write the laws,Bullshit they do. They clearly didn't write the
parliament sells the laws,More of your bullshit and lies
paid lucrative commissions for passing their laws.
ThatrCOs the modern legislative business of parliament.More of your bullshit and lies
When we talk about paying-off politicians in third-worldOnly fools like you do anything of the sort
countries we call it bribery.
However, when we undertake the same process in parliament.
we call it lobbying.
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote
let slip she doesn't really care about little Aussie battlers
And you like most listened to her speech?
I did and that's what she said
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote
let slip she doesn't really care about little Aussie battlers
And you like most listened to her speech?
I did and that's what she said
I heard her say
"Fit in or fuck off"
Not what you are claiming?
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote
let slip she doesn't really care about little Aussie battlers
And you like most listened to her speech?
I did and that's what she said
I heard her say
"Fit in or fuck off"
She never said anything like that even using different words
--Not what you are claiming?
While she did rave on about what problems she
claims lots are having, she didn't propose any
fixes for any of them and in fact has just voted
against the recent pay rises and the budget
changes like the tax handouts for those
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote
let slip she doesn't really care about little Aussie battlers
And you like most listened to her speech?
I did and that's what she said
I heard her say
"Fit in or fuck off"
She never said anything like that even using different words
So you watched (if you did at all) on ABC
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2Not what you are claiming?
While she did rave on about what problems she
claims lots are having, she didn't propose any
fixes for any of them and in fact has just voted
against the recent pay rises and the budget
changes like the tax handouts for those
On Sun, 28 Jun 2026 11:33:39 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
let slip she doesn't really care about little Aussie battlers
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote
let slip she doesn't really care about little Aussie battlers
And you like most listened to her speech?
I did and that's what she said
I heard her say
"Fit in or fuck off"
She never said anything like that even using different words
So you watched (if you did at all) on ABC
Yep, watched it on iView
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote
let slip she doesn't really care about little Aussie battlers
What "Little Aussie Battlers"?
We the taxpaying few,
are aghast at the stampede to country estates,
fishing holes, Bali, Port Douglas, etc and so forth.
The roads are
CLOGGED with the aforementioned "battlers" in their hi-end autos
rushing to spend (on credit cards) moneys better saved for the rainy
day fast approaching!
I hope Pauline introduces a departure tax,a hi-end auto tax, and a
road-user tax on school holidays.
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wroteShe has since rabbited on about it elsewhere as well
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wroteAs far as I know it was only on the National Press Conference https://youtu.be/kSYatJcVELU?si=rRfE1QY-HgJ8x3RD
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wroteYep, watched it on iView
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wroteSo you watched (if you did at all) on ABC
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wroteShe never said anything like that even using different words
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wroteI heard her say
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wroteI did and that's what she said
let slip she doesn't really care about little Aussie battlersAnd you like most listened to her speech?
"Fit in or fuck off"
Pauline Hanson Monoculture
How multiculturalism was endorsed by the High Court of AustraliaBullshit it ever did
By redefining Religion by talking around it.No religion was ever redefined and multiculture
Scientology Example: Founding Culture vs Modern Court Let's useIrrelevant to multiculturalism, that was JUST making it clear
Scientology (Church of the New Faith v Commissioner of Pay-Roll Tax
(Vic) HCA 40)rCoa tax case where the High Court defined "religion"
broadly, exempting it from payroll tax as a "religious institution".
Strict "Founding Culture" Reading 1900 Context: 96% ChristianMindless bullshit the jews, chinese, afghans, abos. sikhs etc
population; "religion" meant Protestant/Catholic denominations
(Anglican 39%, Catholic 23%, Presbyterian 12%).
Framers like Downer called Australia a "Christian Commonwealth";And S116 says the exact opposite
non-Christian faiths <1% (Jews, etc.).Bullshit it did anything of the sort
Section 116's "any religion" assumed Christian pluralism amid Sunday
laws debates.
Handling: Scientology (founded 1954, Hubbard's sci-fiMore mindless bullshit given the real meaning of that word
cosmology/thetans) fails 1900 "ordinary meaning"rCono supernatural
Being/God, profit-driven courses, no ethical canon beyond self-help.
Court rejects as "charlatanry," denies exemption; states regulate as business/cult, preserving Christian heritage without referendum.Irrelevant to the real meaning of religion which includes
How the Court Actually Handled It 1983 Ruling (Mason CJ, Brennan,All irrelevant to multiculturalism
Murphy, Wilson, Deane JJ; Gibbs CJ dissenting):
Adopted functional testrCobelief in supernatural Being/Principle +
acceptance of canons of conduct (offences against ordinary law
unprotected).
Scientology qualifies via thetans (immortal spirits), ethics codes,
rituals.
Impact: Exempt from Vic payroll tax; sets national precedent for
charities, s116.
Murphy J emphasized protecting "heresy" from orthodoxy; no founding<reams of crap irrelevant to multiculturalism flushed where it belongs>
intent lock-inrCowords evolve for new realities (e.g., U.S. analogies to non-theistic beliefs).
No Referendum Needed: Court views as application, not amendmentrCotext unchanged, just broader scope.
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote
let slip she doesn't really care about little Aussie battlers
And you like most listened to her speech?
I did and that's what she said
I heard her say
"Fit in or fuck off"
She never said anything like that even using different words
So you watched (if you did at all) on ABC
Yep, watched it on iView
As far as I know it was only on the National Press Conference
https://youtu.be/kSYatJcVELU?si=rRfE1QY-HgJ8x3RD
Pauline Hanson Monoculture
She has since rabbited on about it elsewhere as well
How multiculturalism was endorsed by the High Court of Australia
Bullshit it ever did
By redefining Religion by talking around it.
No religion was ever redefined and multiculture
has always been around LONG before there was
ever any federal constitution or any High Court
Scientology Example: Founding Culture vs Modern Court Let's use
Scientology (Church of the New Faith v Commissioner of Pay-Roll Tax
(Vic) HCA 40)ua tax case where the High Court defined "religion"
broadly, exempting it from payroll tax as a "religious institution".
Irrelevant to multiculturalism, that was JUST making it clear
what the court believed that the tax law applied to and didn't
refine religion at all
Strict "Founding Culture" Reading 1900 Context: 96% Christian
population; "religion" meant Protestant/Catholic denominations
(Anglican 39%, Catholic 23%, Presbyterian 12%).
Mindless bullshit the jews, chinese, afghans, abos. sikhs etc
As far as I know it was only on the National Press Conference https://youtu.be/kSYatJcVELU?si=rRfE1QY-HgJ8x3RD
Pauline Hanson Monoculture
How multiculturalism was endorsed by the High Court of Australia
By redefining Religion by talking around it.
Scientology Example: Founding Culture vs Modern Court Let's use
Scientology (Church of the New Faith v Commissioner of Pay-Roll Tax
(Vic) HCA 40)rCoa tax case where the High Court defined "religion"
broadly, exempting it from payroll tax as a "religious institution".
Strict "Founding Culture" Reading 1900 Context: 96% Christian
population; "religion" meant Protestant/Catholic denominations
(Anglican 39%, Catholic 23%, Presbyterian 12%).
Framers like Downer called Australia a "Christian Commonwealth"; non-Christian faiths <1% (Jews, etc.).
Section 116's "any religion" assumed Christian pluralism amid Sunday
laws debates.
Handling: Scientology (founded 1954, Hubbard's sci-fi
cosmology/thetans) fails 1900 "ordinary meaning"rCono supernatural
Being/God, profit-driven courses, no ethical canon beyond self-help.
Court rejects as "charlatanry," denies exemption; states regulate as business/cult, preserving Christian heritage without referendum.
How the Court Actually Handled It 1983 Ruling (Mason CJ, Brennan,
Murphy, Wilson, Deane JJ; Gibbs CJ dissenting):
Adopted functional testrCobelief in supernatural Being/Principle +
acceptance of canons of conduct (offences against ordinary law
unprotected).
Scientology qualifies via thetans (immortal spirits), ethics codes,
rituals.
Impact: Exempt from Vic payroll tax; sets national precedent for
charities, s116.
Murphy J emphasized protecting "heresy" from orthodoxy; no founding
intent lock-inrCowords evolve for new realities (e.g., U.S. analogies to non-theistic beliefs).
No Referendum Needed: Court views as application, not amendmentrCotext unchanged, just broader scope.
This analysis of the 1983 Church of the New Faith v Commissioner of
Pay-Roll Tax (Vic) case perfectly illustrates the exact legal
mechanism that fuels the debate over judicial power versus
original intent.
By detailing both perspectives, it clarifies how a system can legally
drift away from its founding culture without ever changing a single
letter of its written law.
The Originalist Frustration
The "Strict Founding Culture" reading demonstrates exactly why many
voters feel politically manipulated by
the legal system:
The Textual Bait-and-Switch: The founders wrote the
words "any religion" in a 1900 context where that undeniably meant
Christian denominations.
Bypassing the Public: Under a strict originalist view, if a completely modern, sci-fi-based movement wanted the tax benefits of a church, it
should have been put to a referendum.
The Consequences: By bypassing a Section 128 vote, the High Court
effectively acted as a "mini-parliament," creating a massive tax
loophole for a group the founders would have easily classified as a
business enterprise
The Judicial Reality
The "How the Court Actually Handled It" section
explains the administrative mechanics of the modern Australian legal
system:
Connotation vs. Denotation:
The judges did not change the text of Section 116; they simply
expanded the list of things that fit inside the definition of the word "religion".
"The Danger of Narrow Definitions:
Justices Mason and Brennan argued that if the court restricted
"religion" only to Christianity, it would leave the state with the
terrifying power to decide which specific beliefs are "true" or
"false"rCoa power that historically leads to authoritarianism.
The Murphy Doctrine: Justice Lionel MurphyrCOs insistence on protecting "heresy" highlights the shift toward international human rights
standards over traditional British-Australian cultural preservation.
The Ultimate Loophole
This case provides the ultimate blueprint for how Australia
transformed from the "Christian Commonwealth" envisioned by Sir John
Downer into the modern, multicultural state it is today.
It proves that the major political parties do not need to risk a
referendum to change the nationrCOs cultural direction.
They simply pass broad, vaguely worded statutes, and let a highly
trained, unelected judiciary expand the definitions over time to
accommodate international treaties, global movements, and new
demographic realities
As far as I know it was only on the National Press Conference https://youtu.be/kSYatJcVELU?si=rRfE1QY-HgJ8x3RD
Pauline Hanson Monoculture
How multiculturalism was endorsed by the High Court of Australia
By redefining Religion by talking around it.
Scientology Example: Founding Culture vs Modern Court Let's use
Scientology (Church of the New Faith v Commissioner of Pay-Roll Tax
(Vic) HCA 40)rCoa tax case where the High Court defined "religion"
broadly, exempting it from payroll tax as a "religious institution".
Strict "Founding Culture" Reading 1900 Context: 96% Christian
population; "religion" meant Protestant/Catholic denominations
(Anglican 39%, Catholic 23%, Presbyterian 12%).
Framers like Downer called Australia a "Christian Commonwealth"; non-Christian faiths <1% (Jews, etc.).
Section 116's "any religion" assumed Christian pluralism amid Sunday
laws debates.
Handling: Scientology (founded 1954, Hubbard's sci-fi
cosmology/thetans) fails 1900 "ordinary meaning"rCono supernatural
Being/God, profit-driven courses, no ethical canon beyond self-help.
Court rejects as "charlatanry," denies exemption; states regulate as business/cult, preserving Christian heritage without referendum.
How the Court Actually Handled It 1983 Ruling (Mason CJ, Brennan,
Murphy, Wilson, Deane JJ; Gibbs CJ dissenting):
Adopted functional testrCobelief in supernatural Being/Principle +
acceptance of canons of conduct (offences against ordinary law
unprotected).
Scientology qualifies via thetans (immortal spirits), ethics codes,
rituals.
Impact: Exempt from Vic payroll tax; sets national precedent for
charities, s116.
Murphy J emphasized protecting "heresy" from orthodoxy; no founding
intent lock-inrCowords evolve for new realities (e.g., U.S. analogies to non-theistic beliefs).
No Referendum Needed: Court views as application, not amendmentrCotext unchanged, just broader scope.
This analysis of the 1983 Church of the New Faith v Commissioner of
Pay-Roll Tax (Vic) case perfectly illustrates the exact legal
mechanism that fuels the debate over judicial power versus
original intent.
By detailing both perspectives, it clarifies how a system can legally
drift away from its founding culture without ever changing a single
letter of its written law.
The Originalist Frustration
The "Strict Founding Culture" reading demonstrates exactly why many
voters feel politically manipulated by
the legal system:
The Textual Bait-and-Switch: The founders wrote the
words "any religion" in a 1900 context where that undeniably meant
Christian denominations.
Bypassing the Public: Under a strict originalist view, if a completely modern, sci-fi-based movement wanted the tax benefits of a church, it
should have been put to a referendum.
The Consequences: By bypassing a Section 128 vote, the High Court
effectively acted as a "mini-parliament," creating a massive tax
loophole for a group the founders would have easily classified as a
business enterprise
The Judicial Reality
The "How the Court Actually Handled It" section
explains the administrative mechanics of the modern Australian legal
system:
Connotation vs. Denotation:
The judges did not change the text of Section 116; they simply
expanded the list of things that fit inside the definition of the word "religion".
"The Danger of Narrow Definitions:
Justices Mason and Brennan argued that if the court restricted
"religion" only to Christianity, it would leave the state with the
terrifying power to decide which specific beliefs are "true" or
"false"rCoa power that historically leads to authoritarianism.
The Murphy Doctrine: Justice Lionel MurphyrCOs insistence on protecting "heresy" highlights the shift toward international human rights
standards over traditional British-Australian cultural preservation.
The Ultimate Loophole
This case provides the ultimate blueprint for how Australia
transformed from the "Christian Commonwealth" envisioned by Sir John
Downer into the modern, multicultural state it is today.
It proves that the major political parties do not need to risk a
referendum to change the nationrCOs cultural direction.
They simply pass broad, vaguely worded statutes, and let a highly
trained, unelected judiciary expand the definitions over time to
accommodate international treaties, global movements, and new
demographic realities
On 29/6/26 12:03, Petzl wrote:
Great post Petz. It goes to show that s.116 or anything resembling a
'bill of rights' should never have been put into the Constitution.
How anybody could regard something like Scientology as a 'religion'
rather than a satanic cult is beyond me.
Obviously these judges are some brand of atheist with an animus against >Christianity, and they exploited their unelected positions to do the damage.
--As far as I know it was only on the National Press Conference
https://youtu.be/kSYatJcVELU?si=rRfE1QY-HgJ8x3RD
Pauline Hanson Monoculture
How multiculturalism was endorsed by the High Court of Australia
By redefining Religion by talking around it.
Scientology Example: Founding Culture vs Modern Court Let's use
Scientology (Church of the New Faith v Commissioner of Pay-Roll Tax
(Vic) HCA 40)ua tax case where the High Court defined "religion"
broadly, exempting it from payroll tax as a "religious institution".
Strict "Founding Culture" Reading 1900 Context: 96% Christian
population; "religion" meant Protestant/Catholic denominations
(Anglican 39%, Catholic 23%, Presbyterian 12%).
Framers like Downer called Australia a "Christian Commonwealth";
non-Christian faiths <1% (Jews, etc.).
Section 116's "any religion" assumed Christian pluralism amid Sunday
laws debates.
Handling: Scientology (founded 1954, Hubbard's sci-fi
cosmology/thetans) fails 1900 "ordinary meaning"uno supernatural
Being/God, profit-driven courses, no ethical canon beyond self-help.
Court rejects as "charlatanry," denies exemption; states regulate as
business/cult, preserving Christian heritage without referendum.
How the Court Actually Handled It 1983 Ruling (Mason CJ, Brennan,
Murphy, Wilson, Deane JJ; Gibbs CJ dissenting):
Adopted functional testubelief in supernatural Being/Principle +
acceptance of canons of conduct (offences against ordinary law
unprotected).
Scientology qualifies via thetans (immortal spirits), ethics codes,
rituals.
Impact: Exempt from Vic payroll tax; sets national precedent for
charities, s116.
Murphy J emphasized protecting "heresy" from orthodoxy; no founding
intent lock-inuwords evolve for new realities (e.g., U.S. analogies to
non-theistic beliefs).
No Referendum Needed: Court views as application, not amendmentutext
unchanged, just broader scope.
This analysis of the 1983 Church of the New Faith v Commissioner of
Pay-Roll Tax (Vic) case perfectly illustrates the exact legal
mechanism that fuels the debate over judicial power versus
original intent.
By detailing both perspectives, it clarifies how a system can legally
drift away from its founding culture without ever changing a single
letter of its written law.
The Originalist Frustration
The "Strict Founding Culture" reading demonstrates exactly why many
voters feel politically manipulated by
the legal system:
The Textual Bait-and-Switch: The founders wrote the
words "any religion" in a 1900 context where that undeniably meant
Christian denominations.
Bypassing the Public: Under a strict originalist view, if a completely
modern, sci-fi-based movement wanted the tax benefits of a church, it
should have been put to a referendum.
The Consequences: By bypassing a Section 128 vote, the High Court
effectively acted as a "mini-parliament," creating a massive tax
loophole for a group the founders would have easily classified as a
business enterprise
The Judicial Reality
The "How the Court Actually Handled It" section
explains the administrative mechanics of the modern Australian legal
system:
Connotation vs. Denotation:
The judges did not change the text of Section 116; they simply
expanded the list of things that fit inside the definition of the word
"religion".
"The Danger of Narrow Definitions:
Justices Mason and Brennan argued that if the court restricted
"religion" only to Christianity, it would leave the state with the
terrifying power to decide which specific beliefs are "true" or
"false"ua power that historically leads to authoritarianism.
The Murphy Doctrine: Justice Lionel MurphyAs insistence on protecting
"heresy" highlights the shift toward international human rights
standards over traditional British-Australian cultural preservation.
The Ultimate Loophole
This case provides the ultimate blueprint for how Australia
transformed from the "Christian Commonwealth" envisioned by Sir John
Downer into the modern, multicultural state it is today.
It proves that the major political parties do not need to risk a
referendum to change the nationAs cultural direction.
They simply pass broad, vaguely worded statutes, and let a highly
trained, unelected judiciary expand the definitions over time to
accommodate international treaties, global movements, and new
demographic realities
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wroteThat never happened, most obviously with the jews, afghans, abos. sikhs etc
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wroteAustralian colonists demanded Australia become a Christian only
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wroteShe has since rabbited on about it elsewhere as well
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wroteAs far as I know it was only on the National Press Conference
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wroteYep, watched it on iView
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wroteSo you watched (if you did at all) on ABC
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wroteShe never said anything like that even using different words
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wroteI heard her say
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wroteI did and that's what she said
let slip she doesn't really care about little Aussie battlers>>>>>>>>> And you like most listened to her speech?
"Fit in or fuck off"
https://youtu.be/kSYatJcVELU?si=rRfE1QY-HgJ8x3RD
Pauline Hanson Monoculture
Strict "Founding Culture" Reading 1900 Context: 96% ChristianMindless bullshit given the jews, chinese, afghans, abos. sikhs etc
population; "religion" meant Protestant/Catholic denominations
(Anglican 39%, Catholic 23%, Presbyterian 12%).
Monoculture,
without that guarantee Federation would of been still born.Complete and utter pig ignorant bullshit
Sir John Downer Kings Council, stated, when the AustralianAnd the constitution ended up with S116 ANYWAY
Constitution was finally adopted and on behalf of future generations,
rCyOur Australian Commonwealth from its first stage will be a Christian CommonwealthrCO.
The Originalist FrustrationMindless bullshit given the jews, chinese, afghans, abos. sikhs etc
The "Strict Founding Culture" reading demonstrates exactly why many
voters feel politically manipulated by
the legal system:
The Textual Bait-and-Switch: The founders wrote the
words "any religion" in a 1900 context where that
undeniably only meant Christian denominations.
Bypassing the Public:More mindless bullshit as your previous steaming turd said
Under a strict originalist view, if a completely modern, sci-fi-based movement wanted the tax benefits of a church, it should have been put
to a referendum.
The Consequences:There never was any bypassing of S128 because
By bypassing a Section 128 vote, the High Court effectively acted as a> "mini-parliament," creating a massive tax loophole for a group the
founders would have easily classified as a business enterprise
The Judicial RealityThere was no expansion because religion is not defined in the constitution
The "How the Court Actually Handled It" section explains the
administrative mechanics of the modern Australian legal system
Connotation vs. Denotation:
The judges did not change the text of Section 116; they simply
expanded the list of things that fit inside the definition of the word> "religion".
"The Danger of Narrow Definitions:And that is correct
Justices Mason and Brennan argued that if the court restricted
"religion" only to Christianity, it would leave the state with the
terrifying power to decide which specific beliefs are "true" or
"false"rCoa power that historically leads to authoritarianism.
The Murphy Doctrine: Justice Lionel MurphyrCOs insistence on protecting "heresy"There is no such doctrine
highlights the shift toward international human rights standardsMore mindless bullshit given that WE HAVE ALWAYS HAD MULTICULTURALISM
over traditional British-Australian cultural preservation.No such animal
The Ultimate LoopholeWhile he wanted that, that never happened
This case provides the ultimate blueprint for how Australia
transformed from the "Christian Commonwealth" envisioned by Sir John
Downer into the modern, multicultural state it is today.
It proves that the major political parties do not need to risk aThere never was any change in cultural direction given
referendum to change the nationrCOs cultural direction.
They simply pass broad, vaguely worded statutes, and let a highlyThat never happened given that WE HAVE ALWAYS HAD MULTICULTURALISM
trained, unelected judiciary expand the definitions over time to
accommodate international treaties, global movements, and new
demographic realities
Petzl wrote
Great post Petz. It goes to show that s.116 or anything resembling a
'bill of rights' should never have been put into the Constitution.
How anybody could regard something like Scientology as a 'religion'
rather than a satanic cult is beyond me.
Obviously these judges are some brand of atheist with an animus against Christianity,
and they exploited their unelected positions to do the damage.
Scientology is banned in many counties as a scam,
here are a few
Scientology has been shut down in Greece, indicted in Spain,
its activities restricted in Russia,
rebuffed by Sweden's highest court,
expelled from college campuses in Norway,
convicted of crimes in Canada
and denied status as a charitable organization or a religion in
most European countries.
In Australia the Arab lobby wanted Islam legalized
the high court was
used to do this using Scientology as a funded tax dodge.
With Christianity as a Monoculture
it does not impact anyone who does
not wish to become part of it. But it denied other faiths from
becoming a Tax payer funded religion,
also applies to Schools.
wrote-- <https://www.perplexity.ai/search/rod-speed-usenet-troll-iBra.u6iSuy..0dwUJuvhQ#0>
wrote-- <https://www.perplexity.ai/search/rod-speed-usenet-troll-iBra.u6iSuy..0dwUJuvhQ#0>
....
Oh NO!
Petz has run out of additional brain-numbing bullshit to post, so no he >keeps on posting empty space.
|urd||g
Oh NO!No good posing to empty spaces like |urd||g
Petz has run out of additional brain-numbing bullshit to post, so now he
keeps on posting empty space.
|urd||g's cholesterol levels are too low, impacting his brain function
As far as I know it was only on the National Press Conference https://youtu.be/kSYatJcVELU?si=rRfE1QY-HgJ8x3RD
Pauline Hanson Monoculture
On 29/6/26 12:03, Petzl wrote:
As far as I know it was only on the National Press Conference
https://youtu.be/kSYatJcVELU?si=rRfE1QY-HgJ8x3RD
Pauline Hanson Monoculture
The speech is quite interesting and well worth viewing.
In particular at the beginning she quotes some very interesting figures
on not only immigration, but poverty in Australia.
This is alone might explain and her rise in political significance.
# /This is a reply to pre-filtered & auto edited post/
# /All quoted inputs by kill-file residents have been expunged/
|urd||g
Oh NO!No good posing to empty spaces like |urd||g
Petz has run out of additional brain-numbing bullshit to post, so now he >>> keeps on posting empty space.
|urd||g's cholesterol levels are too low, impacting his brain function
ROTFLOL!
That must be one of your lamest replies ever, Petz dear, in tying to
justify your inability to respond at all to people who are critical of
your insults on the newsgroup's sanity.
:-P-a-a-a :-P-a-a-a :-P-a-a-a :-P-a-a :-P
PS: How is your much fabled Xtian fundy theocracy monoculture plans championed by One Nation for OZ are coming along? I heard via the
grapevine that it has lost some of its shiny varnish for the majority of
the OZ electorates.
On 30/06/2026 11:01 am, The Newsgroup Devil wrote:
# /This is a reply to pre-filtered & auto edited post/Yeah, I was watching ABC 24 today and they showed a Poll result which
# /All quoted inputs by kill-file residents have been expunged/
+rd%g
Oh NO!No good posing to empty spaces like +rd%g
Petz has run out of additional brain-numbing bullshit to post, so now he >>>> keeps on posting empty space.
+rd%g's cholesterol levels are too low, impacting his brain function
ROTFLOL!
That must be one of your lamest replies ever, Petz dear, in tying to
justify your inability to respond at all to people who are critical of
your insults on the newsgroup's sanity.
:-Paaa :-Paaa :-Paaa :-Paa :-P
PS: How is your much fabled Xtian fundy theocracy monoculture plans
championed by One Nation for OZ are coming along? I heard via the
grapevine that it has lost some of its shiny varnish for the majority of
the OZ electorates.
had Labor at about 40%, ON at about 22% and coalition at about 15% (or >something like that).
So better for Labor, not so good for Coalition!!
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wroteThe ABC doesn't do polls, it was reporting someone else's poll
The Newsgroup Devil wroteSo a ABC poll would not be biased,
How is your much fabled Xtian fundy theocracy monoculture plansYeah, I was watching ABC 24 today and they showed a Poll result which>> had Labor at about 40%, ON at about 22% and coalition at about 15% (or
championed by One Nation for OZ are coming along? I heard via the
grapevine that it has lost some of its shiny varnish for the majority >>> of the OZ electorates.
something like that).
So better for Labor, not so good for Coalition!!
part of us being a Monoculture is forthe ABC to rely on it's own > funding?Nothing whatever to do with monoculture
The people turning to One Nation are doing so because theyrCOve seenNope, they have actually been stupid enough
what the Coalition and Labor did.
They watched an elite political classWe don't have anything even remotely like that
impose ruinous rules and regulations upon our country.Nothing ruinous about any of those which
They endured economic and cultural experimentsconducted by a > protected political species.Mindless bullshit given what happened to Dutton
They voted but werenrCOt heard.Mindless bullshit given what happened to Dutton
Monoculture Australian votersThere has never been anything even remotely like
are seeing these absolute WillardsWhatever that shit is about
have taken Australian fortunes and turned them into a trillion-dollar > debt.More mindless bullshit given that the coalition actually
TheyrCOve converted Australia from an energy supersourceIt was never that
into a climate panic zone where families canrCOt pay power bills.There were always some that couldnt pay their power
TheyrCOve erased our geographic and political independenceComplete and utter mindless bullshit
by shackling us to the unelected and unaccountable UN.Complete and utter mindless bullshit
<https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/one-nation-records-historic-result-in-latest-poll-since-hansons-monoculture-call-despite-albanese-rejecting-it-as-nonsense/news-story/3ecdbeb123199de72a7c12b4fb9efbd2>Pity about what this says about polls https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3emvezsmjn0kxrom0ehds/IMG_3651.JPG?rlkey=4oop4xxgvmbvenmewz096h6vs&dl=0
https://tinyurl.com/mryt98h9
Australians inclined to support One Nation have seen all of this.More completely mindless bullshit with covid alone
They have seen, during the past 20 years, how everything bad about
Australia is caused by governments.
Now, of course, yourCOre hearing from the major parties and apologistsAnd Hanson has just proved that, yet again
for mainstream politics that One Nation isnrCOt ready for government.
Daniel70 >> |urd||g>>> Petz>>>> |urd||g>>>>>>>>> Oh NO!>>>>> Petz has run out ofadditional brain-numbing bullshit to post, so now he>>>>> keeps on
So a ABC poll would not be biased,PS: How is your much fabled Xtian fundy theocracy monoculture plansYeah, I was watching ABC 24 today and they showed a Poll result which
championed by One Nation for OZ are coming along? I heard via the
grapevine that it has lost some of its shiny varnish for the majority of >>> the OZ electorates.
had Labor at about 40%, ON at about 22% and coalition at about 15% (or
something like that).
So better for Labor, not so good for Coalition!!
part of us being a Monoculture is for the ABC to rely on it's own funding?
But then you can't figure why a Bus takes longer in getting me home!
The people turning to One Nation are doing so because
theyrCOve seen
what the Coalition and Labor did.
They watched an elite political
class impose ruinous rules and regulations upon our country.
skynews ...
One Nation isnrCOt ready for government.
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wroteWell, something's gonna happen. Too many chiefs & not enough injuns!
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote
let slip she doesn't really care about little Aussie battlers
What "Little Aussie Battlers"?
We the taxpaying few,
Mindless bullshit on the few claim
Almost everyone pays some tax, even if its only the GST
are aghast at the stampede to country estates,
fishing holes, Bali, Port Douglas, etc and so forth.
More mindless bullshit
The roads are
CLOGGED with the aforementioned "battlers" in their hi-end autos
rushing to spend (on credit cards) moneys better saved for the rainy
day fast approaching!
More mindless bullshit on the fast approaching
I hope Pauline introduces a departure tax,a hi-end auto tax, and a
road-user tax on school holidays.
Not going to happen given that she will never
be in any position to ever introduce any tax
Trouble truth is not what the lobbyist run media are printing.
Just realigning excerpts in ways to malign her
One Nation isnAt ready for government.
One Nation isn't fit to govern any decent human beings anywhere on this >planet of ours.
:-P :-P :-P :-P :-P :-P--
--
+rd%g
Your relentless newsgroup devil at your service
# /This is a reply to pre-filtered & auto edited post/
# /All quoted inputs by kill-file residents have been expunged/
Trouble truth is not what the lobbyist run media are printing.
Bzzzzt! Lobbyists do not run the media!
GoonCon 4 again?
Just realigning excerpts in ways to malign her
Keep on worshipping the fish&chips auntie till the cows come home, Petz >dear!
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote
let slip she doesn't really care about little Aussie battlers
What "Little Aussie Battlers"?
We the taxpaying few,
Mindless bullshit on the few claim
Almost everyone pays some tax, even if its only the GST
are aghast at the stampede to country estates,
fishing holes, Bali, Port Douglas, etc and so forth.
More mindless bullshit
The roads are
CLOGGED with the aforementioned "battlers" in their hi-end autos
rushing to spend (on credit cards) moneys better saved for the rainy
day fast approaching!
More mindless bullshit on the fast approaching
Well, something's gonna happen.
Too many chiefs & not enough injuns!
I hope Pauline introduces a departure tax,a hi-end auto tax, and a
road-user tax on school holidays.
Not going to happen given that she will never
be in any position to ever introduce any tax
Yes, that is true, but her following has put the wind up the other parties
who will now adjust their policies accordingly.
The Newsgroup Devil <Devil@Hell.biz> wroteThen you need a new hearing aid or your first hearing aid
Coming from a Stalinist that's rich.One Nation isnrCOt ready for government.One Nation isn't fit to govern any decent human beings anywhere on this
planet of ours.
Feeding his regime by murdering 8 million of his citizens sounds very
much like what Albanese is doing.
Doing the 1987 Keating thing to takeaway asset value of peoplesAlbo has done nothing of the sort
houses,
to house and home his mass immigration of dole receiving IsisThere has been no mass immigration of dole receiving Isis terrorists
terrorists is more important.
To have Australia a Monoculture of course makes sense.Not even possible and never has been given the abos
Everything Paul Keating Labor did in 1987 is near being repeated byMore mindless bullshit, as always from you
Albanese Labor in 2026!
The rest of this repeated disaster is now happening again?There was no disaster then
Labor under Paul Keating in 1987,Keating was never the labor 'leader' then
properties crashing, bank interest rates hitting 20%.That came later
rentals became scarce and rents sky rocket,More mindless bullshit
little new construction!More mindless bullshit
House prices fall in four capital cities as Sydney values drop nearlyWhich is sweet fuck all in the $1M value of
$50,000 in June this year.
Now, of course, yourCOre hearing from the major parties and apologistsOf course it isn't. She hasn't proposed a damned thing
for mainstream politics that One Nation isnrCOt ready for government.
The Newsgroup Devil <Devil@Hell.biz> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Trouble truth is not what the lobbyist run media are printing.
Bzzzzt! Lobbyists do not run the media!
GoonCon 4 again?
Just realigning excerpts in ways to malign her
Keep on worshipping the fish&chips auntie till the cows come home, Petz
dear!
The Penrith area is about to become a flood zone again
already you property is down $100,000 and dropping,
better start looking for a bridge to live under.
You will be voting for the fish&chips auntie there's become no
choice.
On Wed, 1 Jul 2026 01:20:36 +0200, The Newsgroup Devil
<Devil@Hell.biz> wrote:
# /This is a reply to pre-filtered & auto edited post/The Penrith area is about to become a flood zone again already you
# /All quoted inputs by kill-file residents have been expunged/
Trouble truth is not what the lobbyist run media are printing.
Bzzzzt! Lobbyists do not run the media!
GoonCon 4 again?
Just realigning excerpts in ways to malign her
Keep on worshipping the fish&chips auntie till the cows come home, Petz
dear!
property is down $100,000 and dropping, better start looking for a
bridge to live under.
Keep on worshipping the fish&chips auntie till the cows come home, PetzThe Penrith area is about to become a flood zone again already you
dear!
property is down $100,000 and dropping, better start looking for a
bridge to live under.
Oh!! Oh!! Oh!! Petzl, can I appoint YOU as my local Property agent
advising me of Penrith Properties I should BUY?? .... I mean, *IF*
prices *ARE* falling!!
Oh!! No, WAIT!! I mean Penrith *IS* about 35-40 km from Parramatta!!
Bugger that!!Take care with a spooked property market,
|urd||g
PetzComing from a Stalinist that's rich.
One Nation isnrCOt ready for government.
One Nation isn't fit to govern any decent human beings anywhere on this
planet of ours.
To have Australia a Monoculture of course makes sense.
Everything Paul Keating Labor did in 1987 is near being repeated by
Albanese Labor in 2026!
The rest of this repeated disaster is now happening again?
Labor under Paul Keating in 1987, properties crashing, bank interest
rates hitting 20%. rentals became scarce and rents sky rocket, little
new construction!
House prices fall in four capital cities as Sydney values drop nearly
$50,000 in June this year.
Now, of course, yourCOre hearing from the major parties and apologists
for mainstream politics that One Nation isnrCOt ready for government.
Everything Paul Keating Labor did in 1987 is near being repeated by
Albanese Labor in 2026!
Bullshit!
The rest of this repeated disaster is now happening again?
Labor under Paul Keating in 1987, properties crashing, bank interest
rates hitting 20%. rentals became scarce and rents sky rocket, little
new construction!
Bullshit!
The Newsgroup Devil <Devil@Hell.biz> wroteBullshit with the 'recession we had to have'
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Everything Paul Keating Labor did in 1987 is near being repeated by
Albanese Labor in 2026!
That hasn't happenedBullshit!
I know is that once markets get spooked,The rest of this repeated disaster is now happening again?Bullshit!
Labor under Paul Keating in 1987, properties crashing, bank interest>>> rates hitting 20%. rentals became scarce and rents sky rocket, little
new construction!
prices can fall like an elevator.That has never happened with property prices in Sydney or Melburg
One's children can now say goodbye to the bank of mum and dad.Even more mindless bullshit given that the bank of
Our Australian commonwealth has survived numerous recessions,Even sillier than you usually manage and that's saying something
one major depression, and two world wars.
Doubt if it will survive a Albanese Labor Government.
In the late 1980s (Hawke Labor), property was hammered by soaringBut didn't see property prices fall like an elevator.
interest rates, recession, tight credit, rising rents, and weak new construction.
spooked property market,
Agents are saying sales slowThat always happens when interest rates increase
I askedAnd nothing those clowns ever say is reality
With Capital gains Tax removal are Agents are saying sales slow https://share.google/aimode/OpCP4rz8pT0RStUr2
Yes, real estate agents and industry analysts are attributing slow
sales and crashing auction clearance rates to the government's
controversial tax reforms.
The changes, which passed into law following the Federal Budget, haveHardly surpising given that quite a bit of the detail with
caused buyer uncertainty,
a severe drop in investor activity,Hardly surpising given that negative gearing is
and plummeting property values.That hasn't happened. So much for your steaming turd of an AI
The core issues agents are observing in the market:Wota stunningly impeccible source
The "Tax Ball and Chain": Real estate bodies
note that ending the 50% capital gains tax discountAnd replacing it with a stupidly complicated way of
and restricting negative gearing on establishedhomes have > significantly chilled market turnover.And so has the increased interest rates
Plummeting Clearances:There has been no plummeting, again, your stupid AI
Agents report that auction clearance rates in major cities haveEven sillier on the buyers claim
dropped to historic lows (some nearing Global Financial Crisis levels)> as investors and buyers flee the market.
Price Drops: Analysts at Prop Track and Cotality have recorded dropsBy sweet fuck all
in home valuesrComost notably in Sydney and MelbournerCo
partially drivenAnd that is clearly what has happened
by this sudden shift in buyer sentiment.Industry Perspective and
Resources:
Mixed Opinions on Impact:
While agents cite falling clearance rates and buyer panic, some
economists argue that the policy is designed to cool overheated
property cycles and boost opportunities for first-home buyers.
|urd||g
I know is that once markets get spooked, prices can fall like anEverything Paul Keating Labor did in 1987 is near being repeated by
Albanese Labor in 2026!
Bullshit!
The rest of this repeated disaster is now happening again?
Labor under Paul Keating in 1987, properties crashing, bank interest
rates hitting 20%. rentals became scarce and rents sky rocket, little
new construction!
Bullshit!
elevator.
One's children can now say goodbye to the bank of mum and dad.
Our Australian commonwealth has survived numerous recessions,
one major depression, and two world wars.
Doubt if it will survive a Albanese Labor Government.
# /This is a reply to pre-filtered & auto edited post/
# /All quoted inputs by kill-file residents have been expunged/
|urd||g
PetzComing from a Stalinist that's rich.
One Nation isnrCOt ready for government.
One Nation isn't fit to govern any decent human beings anywhere on this
planet of ours.
Given the countless number of times I have spoken up against Stalinism
in this very newsgroup your wilful lack of comprehension is now proven
with absolute certainty.
But hey, everyone here immediately recognises this as your frustrated attempt at changing the subject of debate which your are currently
losing quite badly! Yes, this is despite yet another attack dump against what you allege communism is in your illiterate confused mind as some
sort of debate winning knock-out punch against me.
Alas this old, tried and failed tactic of yours ain't working no more!
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a :-P-a-a-a :-P-a-a-a :-P-a-a-a :-P
Nor is your fully fascist theocratic monoculture in OZ anywhere near becoming a reality given the will of the majority of voters, despite all your alcohol drenched wet dreams about it.
To have Australia a Monoculture of course makes sense.
YAWN!
Back to your GoonBags, Petz dear!
# /This is a reply to pre-filtered & auto edited post/
# /All quoted inputs by kill-file residents have been expunged/
|urd||g
Everything Paul Keating Labor did in 1987 is near being repeated by
Albanese Labor in 2026!
Bullshit!I know is that once markets get spooked, prices can fall like an
The rest of this repeated disaster is now happening again?
Labor under Paul Keating in 1987, properties crashing, bank interest
rates hitting 20%. rentals became scarce and rents sky rocket, little
new construction!
Bullshit!
elevator.
Zero, zilch, nort, nada! This is exactly what your economic and
political predictions are worth, Petz dear!
Having said that, it is now becoming a certainty that those usual
high-fling speculators, grifters and scammers, all those profits
hoarding financial ghouls who so far looked upon the property markets
their easy-peasy cash cow now suddenly realising that their good times
may be over thanks to Labor finally putting an stop to their gravy-train run.
But naturally, before they are leaving for other hunting grounds they attempt to put on a last ditch nasty scare campaign in hope of delaying
the inevitable.
One's children can now say goodbye to the bank of mum and dad.
?????
Do you mean they are somehow stopped to inherit anything? By who?
YAWN!
Back to your GoonBags, Petz dear!
No, we should ALL be AUSTRALIANS, first and foremost.
Doesn't matter if our ancestors came out here 20,000 years ago, 200
years ago or 20 months ago.
'We or our ancestors' came here for a better life so 'we' should be
trying to make this life HERE as *GOOD* as it can possibly be! (and
forgot about what is now happening 'over there'!!
--
Daniel70
I know is that once markets get spooked, prices can fall like an
elevator.
Zero, zilch, nort, nada! This is exactly what your economic and
political predictions are worth, Petz dear!
Having said that, it is now becoming a certainty that those usual
high-fling speculators, grifters and scammers, all those profits
hoarding financial ghouls who so far looked upon the property markets
their easy-peasy cash cow now suddenly realising that their good times
may be over thanks to Labor finally putting an stop to their gravy-train
run.
But naturally, before they are leaving for other hunting grounds they
attempt to put on a last ditch nasty scare campaign in hope of delaying
the inevitable.
One's children can now say goodbye to the bank of mum and dad.
?????
Do you mean they are somehow stopped to inherit anything? By who?
No, I'm thinking Petzl means that the price on Mum and Dad's House (i.e.
the Family Home) has fallen sooooo much that Mum and Dad will not be
able to back the Kids when they want to buy property.
A reasonable thought. Hmmm! Did I just type that??
--
Daniel70
On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 21:55:12 +1000, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Being retired my money is in savingsI know is that once markets get spooked, prices can fall like an
elevator.
Zero, zilch, nort, nada! This is exactly what your economic and
political predictions are worth, Petz dear!
Having said that, it is now becoming a certainty that those usual
high-fling speculators, grifters and scammers, all those profits
hoarding financial ghouls who so far looked upon the property markets
their easy-peasy cash cow now suddenly realising that their good times
may be over thanks to Labor finally putting an stop to their gravy-train >>> run.
But naturally, before they are leaving for other hunting grounds they
attempt to put on a last ditch nasty scare campaign in hope of delaying
the inevitable.
One's children can now say goodbye to the bank of mum and dad.
?????
Do you mean they are somehow stopped to inherit anything? By who?
No, I'm thinking Petzl means that the price on Mum and Dad's House (i.e.
the Family Home) has fallen sooooo much that Mum and Dad will not be
able to back the Kids when they want to buy property.
A reasonable thought. Hmmm! Did I just type that??
As soon as the Interest rates go above 10% like they did with
treasurer Keating, will be judging when to sink my funds in to 10 year
bank term interest.
All I know is that once markets get spooked, prices can fall like an elevator.
In the late 1980s (Hawke Labor), property was hammered by soaring
interest rates, recession, tight credit, rising rents, and weak new construction.
This Alabanese repeat og Keating only started last month! <https://www.skynews.com.au/business/finance/housing-market-slump-driven-by-labors-capital-gains-tax-negative-gearing-changes-could-slow-down-total-economy/news-story/e09a69d40ca6d1367b0d78d391c36867>
https://tinyurl.com/bdezawuj
Housing market slump driven by LaborrCOs capital gains tax, negative
gearing changes could 'slow down' total economy
Macquarie bank analyst Victor German estimated that new lending flows
for owner occupiers are down between 10 to 20 per cent, while new
investors are down as much as 50 per cent.
On 2/07/2026 11:09 am, The Newsgroup Devil wrote:House prices haven't dropped much and won't
# /This is a reply to pre-filtered & auto edited post/
# /All quoted inputs by kill-file residents have been expunged/
+rd%g
Everything Paul Keating Labor did in 1987 is near being repeated by
Albanese Labor in 2026!
I suppose Paul WAS Treasurer .... so might have had some impact on the > markets.
Zero, zilch, nort, nada! This is exactly what your economic and >> political predictions are worth, Petz dear!Bullshit!I know is that once markets get spooked, prices can fall like an
The rest of this repeated disaster is now happening again?
Labor under Paul Keating in 1987, properties crashing, bank interest >>>>> rates hitting 20%. rentals became scarce and rents sky rocket, little >>>>> new construction!
Bullshit!
elevator.
Having said that, it is now becoming a certainty that those usual >> high-fling speculators, grifters and scammers, all those profits >> hoarding financial ghouls who so far looked upon the property markets >> their easy-peasy cash cow now suddenly realising that their good times >> may be over thanks to Labor finally putting an stop to their >> gravy-train run.
But naturally, before they are leaving for other hunting grounds they >> attempt to put on a last ditch nasty scare campaign in hope of delaying >> the inevitable.
One's children can now say goodbye to the bank of mum and dad.?????
Do you mean they are somehow stopped to inherit anything? By who?
No, I'm thing Petzl means that the price on Mum and Dad's House (i.e. > the Family Home) has fallen sooooo much that Mum and Dad will not be > able to back the Kids when they want to buy property.
A reasonable thought. Hmmm! Did I just type that??Nope, that was the wacky weed talking, boy :(
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wroteMost of mine is in investments and super
Being retired my money is in savingsNo, I'm thinking Petzl means that the price on Mum and Dad's House (i.e.I know is that once markets get spooked, prices can fall like anZero, zilch, nort, nada! This is exactly what your economic and
elevator.
political predictions are worth, Petz dear!
Having said that, it is now becoming a certainty that those usual
high-fling speculators, grifters and scammers, all those profits
hoarding financial ghouls who so far looked upon the property markets
their easy-peasy cash cow now suddenly realising that their good times
may be over thanks to Labor finally putting an stop to their >>> gravy-train run.
But naturally, before they are leaving for other hunting grounds they
attempt to put on a last ditch nasty scare campaign in hope of delaying
the inevitable.
One's children can now say goodbye to the bank of mum and dad.?????
Do you mean they are somehow stopped to inherit anything? By who?
the Family Home) has fallen sooooo much that Mum and Dad will not be
able to back the Kids when they want to buy property.
A reasonable thought. Hmmm! Did I just type that??
As soon as the Interest rates go above 10%Not going to happen
like they did withThat has never happened with property prices in out lifetimes
treasurer Keating, will be judging when to sink my funds in to 10 year> bank term interest.
All I know is that once markets get spooked, prices can fall like an elevator.
In the late 1980s (Hawke Labor), property was hammered by soaringJust another of your pathetic little drug crazed drunken fantasys
interest rates, recession, tight credit, rising rents, and weak new construction.
This Alabanese repeat og Keating only started last month!
<https://www.skynews.com.au/business/finance/housing-market-slump-driven-by-labors-capital-gains-tax-negative-gearing-changes-could-slow-down-total-economy/news-story/e09a69d40ca6d1367b0d78d391c36867>That is nothing even remotely like fall like an elevator.
https://tinyurl.com/bdezawuj
Housing market slump driven by LaborrCOs capital gains tax, negative
gearing changes could 'slow down' total economy
Macquarie bank analyst Victor German estimated that new lending flowsThat is nothing even remotely like fall like an elevator.
for owner occupiers are down between 10 to 20 per cent,
while new investors are down as much as 50 per cent.Which isn't PROPERTY PRICES, fuckwit
Petzl wroteMe too, don't owe anyone anything
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wroteOwn my own Home, Car, etc.
Being retired my money is in savingsNo, I'm thinking Petzl means that the price on Mum and Dad's House >>> (i.e.I know is that once markets get spooked, prices can fall like anZero, zilch, nort, nada! This is exactly what your economic and
elevator.
political predictions are worth, Petz dear!
Having said that, it is now becoming a certainty that those usual
high-fling speculators, grifters and scammers, all those profits
hoarding financial ghouls who so far looked upon the property markets
their easy-peasy cash cow now suddenly realising that their good times >>>> may be over thanks to Labor finally putting an stop to their >>>> gravy-train run.
But naturally, before they are leaving for other hunting grounds they
attempt to put on a last ditch nasty scare campaign in hope of >>>> delaying the inevitable.
One's children can now say goodbye to the bank of mum and dad.?????
Do you mean they are somehow stopped to inherit anything? By who?
the Family Home) has fallen sooooo much that Mum and Dad will not be>>> able to back the Kids when they want to buy property.
A reasonable thought. Hmmm! Did I just type that??
One week I get about $800 CommSuper per fortnight,I don't have a super pension, I just leave it in there
the alternate week I get about $800 Old Age Pension per fortnight.I haven't bothered to do the paperwork and
So what I had accumulated in *MY* Super over the years (about $150,000) > has become MY Monopoly Money .... well, after I had loaned about $50,000 > (total) to Relatives. I'm using it to *PLAY* on the Stock Market myself > .... making about $35,000 over the past three years or so.Yeah. I still have plenty in the stock market
Why are you such a careless person, boy ?As soon as the Interest rates go above 10% like they did with... and I'll be making MORE money myself, too.
treasurer Keating, will be judging when to sink my funds in to 10 year
bank term interest.
All I know is that once markets get spooked, prices can fall like anWho cares?? It's Monopoly Money.
elevator.
In the late 1980s (Hawke Labor), property was hammered by soaringWho cares??
interest rates, recession, tight credit, rising rents, and weak new
construction.
This Alabanese repeat og Keating only started last month!Who cares??
<https://www.skynews.com.au/business/finance/housing-market-slump-driven-by-labors-capital-gains-tax-negative-gearing-changes-could-slow-down-total-economy/news-story/e09a69d40ca6d1367b0d78d391c36867>
https://tinyurl.com/bdezawuj
Housing market slump driven by LaborrCOs capital gains tax, negative
gearing changes could 'slow down' total economy
Macquarie bank analyst Victor German estimated that new lending flows>> for owner occupiers are down between 10 to 20 per cent, while newWho cares??
investors are down as much as 50 per cent.
On 2/07/2026 9:05 am, The Newsgroup Devil wrote:
# /This is a reply to pre-filtered & auto edited post/
# /All quoted inputs by kill-file residents have been expunged/
|urd||g
PetzComing from a Stalinist that's rich.
One Nation isnrCOt ready for government.
One Nation isn't fit to govern any decent human beings anywhere on this >>>> planet of ours.
Given the countless number of times I have spoken up against Stalinism
in this very newsgroup your wilful lack of comprehension is now proven
with absolute certainty.
But hey, everyone here immediately recognises this as your frustrated
attempt at changing the subject of debate which your are currently
losing quite badly! Yes, this is despite yet another attack dump
against what you allege communism is in your illiterate confused mind
as some sort of debate winning knock-out punch against me.
Alas this old, tried and failed tactic of yours ain't working no more!
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a :-P-a-a-a :-P-a-a-a :-P-a-a-a :-P
Nor is your fully fascist theocratic monoculture in OZ anywhere near
becoming a reality given the will of the majority of voters, despite
all your alcohol drenched wet dreams about it.
To have Australia a Monoculture of course makes sense.
YAWN!
Back to your GoonBags, Petz dear!
No, we should ALL be AUSTRALIANS, first and foremost.
Doesn't matter if our ancestors came out here 20,000 years ago, 200
years ago or 20 months ago.
'We or our ancestors' came here for a better life so 'we' should be
trying to make this life HERE as *GOOD* as it can possibly be! (and
forgot about what is now happening 'over there'!!
Daniel70
|urd||gNow we are being censored from being a Monoculture?
YAWN!
Back to your GoonBags, Petz dear!
No, we should ALL be AUSTRALIANS, first and foremost.
Doesn't matter if our ancestors came out here 20,000 years ago, 200
years ago or 20 months ago.
'We or our ancestors' came here for a better life so 'we' should be
trying to make this life HERE as *GOOD* as it can possibly be! (and
forgot about what is now happening 'over there'!!
Seems only OK to watch n TV in the US?
Too violent for me!
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 70 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 39:36:48 |
| Calls: | 948 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,325 |
| Messages: | 280,644 |
