*SpaceX is already crashing.....*
/Jordan Shanks, 176k subscribers, 14 Jun 2026/ <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWxygnJBWxs>
Just bring it on ... and stop that silly suspensefull waiting!
|urd||g
*SpaceX is already crashing.....**SpaceX is already crashing.....* ..... Is that the float or the actual company??
/Jordan Shanks, 176k subscribers, 14 Jun 2026/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWxygnJBWxs>
Just bring it on ... and stop that silly suspensefull waiting!
Space X is nothing more then a vapour-ware grift. So far it has only had marginal success with Star-link but anything else is basically a huge
conjob extracting funds both from the government (long live corruption)
and investors.
Now that it is listed on the NASDAQ forcing even pension funds to invest
in it hopefully it will be much harder to hide the billions of losses it
is generating by its ridiculous venture into the AI nonsense, not to
mention its serial disastrous space ship failures.
Luckily, it is now under more scrutiny than it was before and after the initial speculative boost it got on the share-market some investors are already looking for the exit.
It is only a matter of time before this massive castle built out of
cards on lots of hot air foundation hype generated by the Elon-fan club collapses ... but hey, in the mean while it made Elon the first
trillionaire on the planet. I wonder how long his joyride is going to last.
# /This is a reply to pre-filtered & auto edited post/
# /All quoted inputs by kill-file residents have been expunged/
Daniel70
+rd%g
*SpaceX is already crashing.....*
/Jordan Shanks, 176k subscribers, 14 Jun 2026/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWxygnJBWxs
Just bring it on ... and stop that silly suspensefull[sic] waiting!
*SpaceX is already crashing.....* ..... Is that the float or the actual
company??
Space X is nothing more then a vapour-ware grift. So far it has only had marginal success with Star-link but anything else is basically a huge
conjob extracting funds both from the government (long live corruption)
and investors....
In news:_w%XR.42914$eDa2.9668@fx06.ams4, The Newsgroup Devil <Devil@Hell.biz> >typed:
# /This is a reply to pre-filtered & auto edited post/
# /All quoted inputs by kill-file residents have been expunged/
Daniel70
+rd%g
*SpaceX is already crashing.....*
/Jordan Shanks, 176k subscribers, 14 Jun 2026/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWxygnJBWxs
Just bring it on ... and stop that silly suspensefull[sic] waiting!
*SpaceX is already crashing.....* ..... Is that the float or the actual
company??
Space X is nothing more then a vapour-ware grift. So far it has only had
marginal success with Star-link but anything else is basically a huge
conjob extracting funds both from the government (long live corruption)
and investors....
From >https://townhall.com/columnists/alanjosephbauer/2026/06/08/boeing-vs-spacex-n2677377
... Let's take a look at some of SpaceX's accomplishments:
a.. Year of Incorporation: 2002
b.. Number of Employees: ~22,000
c.. Number of Vehicle Types: 3 (Falcon, Falcon Heavy, and Starship in
development)
d.. Number of Launches: Over 650 as of the end of 2025, with 165 in 2025
alone.
e.. Number of Upright Landings: Over 600 for Falcon and Falcon Heavy
f.. Number of Caught Rockets: 4 rockets with Mechazilla
g.. Number of Satellites Delivered: Over 12,000, with 10,500 active in
Starlink
h.. Number of Crewed Flights: 18 (11 for NASA and 7 private)
SpaceX has put up more satellites than all other players combined. It has made >rocket launches routine, something that NASA promised with the Space Shuttle but
never delivered. The upright and caught landings are revolutionary. I remember >the character of Calculus in Herge's Tintin landing his rocket on the Moon >upright and thinking that it was so silly: The big boosters are jettisoned into
the ocean, and nobody lands like he took off. But Elon Musk, and later Jeff >Bezos' Blue Origin, do just that. It saves tens of millions of dollars by >requiring the refurbishment of an existing rocket rather than a whole new rocket
to begin with. NASA always lost its boosters, but Musk has made them reusable. >SpaceX makes its patents available to other firms, and the recent explosion of a
Blue Origin rocket on a NASA launch pad led Musk to send his regrets and wish >his competitor success in the future....
Of course, all this pales in comparison with Oz's space program.
|urd||g
Daniel70
|urd||g
*SpaceX is already crashing.....*
/Jordan Shanks, 176k subscribers, 14 Jun 2026/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWxygnJBWxs>
Just bring it on ... and stop that silly suspensefull[sic] waiting!
*SpaceX is already crashing.....* ..... Is that the float or the actual >>>> company??
Space X is nothing more then a vapour-ware grift. So far it has only had
marginal success with Star-link but anything else is basically a huge
conjob extracting funds both from the government (long live corruption)
and investors....
While it is impressive it's a consumer of private enterprise taxes
Unproductive tax payers, ... bullcrap... snip!
# /This is a reply to pre-filtered & auto edited post/ # /All quoted
inputs by kill-file residents have been expunged/
|urd||g
Daniel70
|urd||g
*SpaceX is already crashing.....* /Jordan Shanks, 176k
subscribers, 14 Jun 2026/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWxygnJBWxs>
Just bring it on ... and stop that silly suspensefull[sic]
waiting! *SpaceX is already crashing.....* ..... Is that the
float or the actual company??
Space X is nothing more then a vapour-ware grift. So far it has
only had marginal success with Star-link but anything else is
basically a huge conjob extracting funds both from the government
(long live corruption) and investors....
While it is impressive it's a consumer of private enterprise taxes
WTF are you on about again, Petz dear? Elon is generating (on paper)
amazing amounts of hoarded wealth to the detriment of investors,
private and public pensions funds and, of course gobbling up bucket
loads of government subsidies while actually delivering nothing but unrealisable promises.
SpaceX according to its own declaration for its NASDAQ listing is now
an AI and media transmission technology company ...
that is currently losing billions of dollars.
Long live fully corrupted scam artist robber baron capitalism.
Unproductive tax payers, ... bullcrap... snip!
Oh NO, here comes that pathetic, same old ... same old Thatcherite
bullshit propaganda rhetoric regurgitated the umpteenth time in this
very newsgroup. Petz, you are like a one track pony, through and
through!
"a one track pony"?? I thought it was "a one TRICK pony" .... or is that >giving Petzl too much credit??Unproductive tax payers, ... bullcrap... snip!
Oh NO, here comes that pathetic, same old ... same old Thatcherite
bullshit propaganda rhetoric regurgitated the umpteenth time in this
very newsgroup. Petz, you are like a one track pony, through and
through!
|urd||g
Petz
|urd||g
Daniel70
|urd||g
*SpaceX is already crashing.....* /Jordan Shanks, 176k
subscribers, 14 Jun 2026/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWxygnJBWxs>
Just bring it on ... and stop that silly suspensefull[sic]
waiting! *SpaceX is already crashing.....* ..... Is that the
float or the actual company??
Space X is nothing more then a vapour-ware grift. So far it has
only had marginal success with Star-link but anything else is
basically a huge conjob extracting funds both from the government
(long live corruption) and investors....
While it is impressive it's a consumer of private enterprise taxes
WTF are you on about again, Petz dear? Elon is generating (on paper)
amazing amounts of hoarded wealth to the detriment of investors,
private and public pensions funds and, of course gobbling up bucket
loads of government subsidies while actually delivering nothing but
unrealisable promises.
SpaceX according to its own declaration for its NASDAQ listing is now
an AI and media transmission technology company ...
Is THAT like a company that transmits stuff UP to the satellites IT has
put into orbit then transmitting that same stuff DOWN to Planet Earth??
that is currently losing billions of dollars.
... that the Shareholders will now have to carry. Just as well Elon is
the major Shareholder.
Long live fully corrupted scam artist robber baron capitalism.
Yeap ... and I think Elon is well practised.
"a one track pony"?? I thought it was "a one TRICK pony" .... or is that giving Petzl too much credit??Unproductive tax payers, ... bullcrap... snip!
Oh NO, here comes that pathetic, same old ... same old Thatcherite
bullshit propaganda rhetoric regurgitated the umpteenth time in this
-avery newsgroup. Petz, you are like a one track pony, through and
through!
Daniel70
|urd||g
Unproductive taxpayers are essential working piece of economy."a one track pony"?? I thought it was "a one TRICK pony" .... or is thatUnproductive tax payers, ... bullcrap... snip!
Oh NO, here comes that pathetic, same old ... same old Thatcherite
bullshit propaganda rhetoric regurgitated the umpteenth time in this
very newsgroup. Petz, you are like a one track pony, through and
through!
giving Petzl too much credit??
But they are only fed by productive tax payers, they must be contained
by limiting how much of them that Productive Tax payers can afford!
Elon Musk's SpaceX is totally fed by US productive tax payers!
Nonproductive tax payers,...blah...blah...blah.
Australia at present is spending more productive taxes than are being
earned.
Hence the tax hikes and death taxes,
they have run out of other peoples money.
It is clear the Australian non-government sector of the economy, the
private sector, is in contraction and you could then argue it is in recession!
There is a big transfer between the private sector and the public
sector at the moment. The private sector is shedding jobs to the
public sector, which is picking up jobs.
But are they the non-productive tax funded jobs we want?
+rd%g
More good news about Pauline she is now over 51% in primary vote aloe
for One Nation boosted ahead by resuming Australia's constitutional
Christian Monoculture.
More BS about MAGA
Trump doesn't know KNOWS what he is doing it's called MAGA.
More good news about Pauline she is now over 51% in primary vote
aloe for One Nation boosted ahead by resumingAustralia's
constitutional Christian Monoculture.
More news about MAGA
Trump KNOWS what he is doing it's called MAGA.
Trump's U.S is finding so called Allies all led by fools, Starmer,
Macron, the worst is Netanyahu who did his best to disrupt/sabotage
any US peace deal.
This "MoU" looks to me like Trump is setting these poisonous Allies up
and will be dumping the Iran headache along with $$cost$$ now back on
them with absolutely no US intervention.
Breaking off these so-called alliances as poisonous, would save the US billions at their expense.
What these Allies don't realize is the U.S does not need middle east
Oil, the US has plenty of oil available to them.
Will only affect these treasonous Allies and only they will have
problems with oil supplies.
In future these "Allies" will have to fend for themselves!
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
More good news about Pauline she is now over 51% in primary vote
Bullshit she is
# /This is a reply to pre-filtered & auto edited post/
# /All quoted inputs by kill-file residents have been expunged/...
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
More good news about Pauline she is now over 51% in primary vote
Bullshit she is
<https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/10246-federal-voting-intention-june-9-2026>
One Nation surges into first place for primary support
On Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:32:50 +0200, The Newsgroup Devil
<Devil@Hell.biz> wrote:
More good news about Pauline she is now over 51% in primary vote|urd||g
aloe
for One Nation boosted ahead by resuming Australia's constitutional Christian Monoculture.
On 18/06/2026 9:18 am, Petzl wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:32:50 +0200, The Newsgroup Devil
<Devil@Hell.biz> wrote:
More good news about Pauline she is now over 51% in primary vote+rd%g
No, Petzl, not 51% in Primary Vote .... it may or may not be 51% of a
very small, very very small, sample of the Voters, Petzl, in a
Popularity Pole!!
aloe
WHAT??
for One Nation boosted ahead by resuming Australia's constitutional
Christian Monoculture.
WHAT??
Rod Speed
Petz
More good news about Pauline she is now over 51% in primary vote
Bullshit she is
<https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/10246-federal-voting-intention-june-9-2026>
One Nation surges into first place for primary support
Daniel70
PetzThe Anal nit picker back
More good news about Pauline she is now over 51% in primary vote
No, Petzl, not 51% in Primary Vote .... it may or may not be 51% of a
very small, very very small, sample of the Voters, Petzl, in a
Popularity Pole!!
Was a poll from experts many years being paid for them
"Roy Morgan is AustraliarCOs best known and longest established market research company, with an unparalleled reputation for reliable,
accurate, meaningful, revealing market research."
That >> means it's Ordog quotationaloe
WHAT??
Sir John Downer Kings Council,...bullshitfor One Nation boosted ahead by resuming Australia's constitutional
Christian Monoculture.
WHAT??
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wroteYou never could bullshit your way out of wet paper bag
Petzl wroteThe Anal nit picker back
More good news about Pauline she is now over 51% in primary voteNo, Petzl, not 51% in Primary Vote .... it may or may not be 51% of a>> very small, very very small, sample of the Voters, Petzl, in a
Popularity Pole!!
Was a poll from experts many years being paid for themAnd no poll ever measures the PRIMARY VOTE
"Roy Morgan is AustraliarCOs best known and longest established market research company, with an unparalleled reputation for reliable,No poll ever measures the PRIMARY VOTE
accurate, meaningful, revealing market research."
Pity that's not what the constitution actually saysSir John Downer Kings Council, stated, when the Australianfor One Nation boosted ahead by resuming Australia's constitutionalWHAT??
Christian Monoculture.
Constitution was finally adopted and on behalf of future generations,
rCyOur Australian Commonwealth from its first stage will be a Christian CommonwealthrCO.
That originalist 1899 version
Textualist meaning is calledThe constitution says nothing of the sort
Australia's constitutional Christian Monoculture.
Being based onBut nothing even remotely like a MONOCULTURE
History Heavy focus on the British Empire
rCo The primacy of Western (Greek, Roman) and Judeo-Christian tradition Protestant Work Ethic
rCo Christianity is the norm
On Thu, 18 Jun 2026 23:03:27 +1000, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 18/06/2026 9:18 am, Petzl wrote:The Anal nit picker back
On Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:32:50 +0200, The Newsgroup Devil
<Devil@Hell.biz> wrote:
More good news about Pauline she is now over 51% in primary vote|urd||g
No, Petzl, not 51% in Primary Vote .... it may or may not be 51% of a
very small, very very small, sample of the Voters, Petzl, in a
Popularity Pole!!
Was a poll from experts many years being paid for them
"Roy Morgan is AustraliarCOs best known and longest established market research company, with an unparalleled reputation for reliable,
accurate, meaningful, revealing market research."
That >> means it's Ordog quotationaloe
WHAT??
Sir John Downer Kings Council, stated, when the Australianfor One Nation boosted ahead by resuming Australia's constitutional
Christian Monoculture.
WHAT??
Constitution was finally
Sir John Downer Kings Council, stated, when the Australian
WHAT??
Constitution was finally
It may have applied way back in Sir John Downer's time, Petzl, but The >Australian Constitution HAS been altered/adjusted/changed once or twice >since then, Petzl!!
On Fri, 19 Jun 2026 19:03:16 +1000, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
No constitutional refendum changed it under the required S128WHAT??Sir John Downer Kings Council, stated, when the Australian
Constitution was finally
It may have applied way back in Sir John Downer's time, Petzl, but The
Australian Constitution HAS been altered/adjusted/changed once or twice
since then, Petzl!!
It was minipulated change by the high court under John Howard.
Not that you care or have the intelligence to grasp reality here is
what happened
On 19/06/2026 7:31 pm, Petzl wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2026 19:03:16 +1000, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
No constitutional refendum changed it under the required S128WHAT??Sir John Downer Kings Council, stated, when the Australian
Constitution was finally
It may have applied way back in Sir John Downer's time, Petzl, but The
Australian Constitution HAS been altered/adjusted/changed once or twice
since then, Petzl!!
It was minipulated change by the high court under John Howard.
Not that you care or have the intelligence to grasp reality here is
what happened
.... but. Petzl, I DO have the intelligence to know John Howard NEVER
ruled the High Court, Petzl!!
RULED the appointment of THOSE HE might have appointed to the HIGH
COURT, Petzl, sure, but NEVER what their Rulings were, Petzl!!
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wroteWhatever he said is completely irrelevant, what
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote
WHAT??Sir John Downer Kings Council, stated, when the Australian
Constitution was finally
Not as far as religion is concernedIt may have applied way back in Sir John Downer's time, Petzl, but The
Australian Constitution HAS been altered/adjusted/changed once or twice
since then, Petzl!!
No constitutional refendum changed it under the required S128Its the constitution that does that,
It was minipulated change by the high court under John Howard.
Not that you care or have the intelligence to grasp reality here is
what happened
Scientology Example: Founding Culture vs Modern Court Let's use
Scientology (Church of the New Faith v Commissioner of Pay-Roll Tax
(Vic) HCA 40)rCoa tax case where the High Court defined "religion"
broadly, exempting it from payroll tax as a "religious institution".
Strict "Founding Culture" Reading 1900 Context: 96% ChristianWhat matters is the constitution which never says anything like that
population; "religion" meant Protestant/Catholic denominations
(Anglican 39%, Catholic 23%, Presbyterian 12%).
Framers like Downer called Australia a "Christian Commonwealth"; non-Christian faiths <1% (Jews, etc.).
Section 116's "any religion" assumed Christian pluralism amid SundayBULLSHIT
laws debates.
Handling: Scientology (founded 1954, Hubbard's sci-fiTry that again in english when not completely blotto
cosmology/thetans) fails 1900 "ordinary meaning"rCono supernatural
Being/God, profit-driven courses, no ethical canon beyond self-help.
Court rejects as "charlatanry," denies exemption; states regulate as business/cult, preserving Christian heritage without referendum.
How the Court Actually Handled It 1983 Ruling (Mason CJ, Brennan,Which includes moslems, fuckwit
Murphy, Wilson, Deane JJ; Gibbs CJ dissenting):
Adopted functional testrCobelief in supernatural Being/Principle +
acceptance of canons of conduct (offences against ordinary law
unprotected).
Scientology qualifies via thetans (immortal spirits), ethics codes,Bullshit, most obviously with the jews
rituals.
Impact: Exempt from Vic payroll tax; sets national precedent for
charities, s116.
Murphy J emphasized protecting "heresy" from orthodoxy; no founding
intent lock-inrCowords evolve for new realities (e.g., U.S. analogies to non-theistic beliefs).
No Referendum Needed: Court views as application, not amendmentrCotext unchanged, just broader scope.
17 June 2026This analysis of the 1983 Church of the New Faith v
Commissioner of Pay-Roll Tax (Vic) case perfectly illustrates the
exact legal mechanism that fuels the debate over judicial power versus> original intent.
By detailing both perspectives, it clarifies how a system can legally
drift away from its founding culture without ever changing a single
letter of its written law.
The Originalist FrustrationThe "Strict Founding Culture" reading
demonstrates exactly why many voters feel politically manipulated by
the legal system:The Textual Bait-and-Switch: The founders wrote the
words "any religion" in a 1900 context where that undeniably meant
Christian denominations.
Bypassing the Public: Under a strict originalist view, if a completely> modern, sci-fi-based movement wanted the tax benefits of a church, itIrrelevant to your mindless shit about moslems
should have been put to a referendum.
The Consequences: By bypassing a Section 128 vote, the High CourtMore mindless bullshit
effectively acted as a "mini-parliament," creating a massive tax
loophole for a group the founders would have easily classified as a
business enterprise
The Judicial RealityThe "How the Court Actually Handled It" sectionMore mindless waffle
explains the administrative mechanics of the modern Australian legal system:Connotation vs. Denotation:
The judges did not change the text of Section 116; they simplyMore mindless bullshit
expanded the list of things that fit inside the definition of the word> "religion".
"The Danger of Narrow Definitions:And they were dead right
Justices Mason and Brennan argued that if the court restricted
"religion" only to Christianity, it would leave the state with the
terrifying power to decide which specific beliefs are "true" or
"false"rCoa power that historically leads to authoritarianism.
The Murphy Doctrine: Justice Lionel MurphyrCOs insistence on protecting "heresy" highlights the shift toward international human rightsMore mindless bullshit
standards over traditional British-Australian cultural preservation.
The Ultimate LoopholeThat fool is completely irrelevant, he
This case provides the ultimate blueprint for how Australia
transformed from the "Christian Commonwealth" envisioned by Sir John
Downer
into the modern, multicultural state it is today.Nothing to do with culture
It proves that the major political parties do not need to risk aThere is no need for a referendum given that the constitution
referendum to change the nationrCOs cultural direction.
They simply pass broad, vaguely worded statutes, and let a highlyThere is no definition of religion in the constitution to expand
trained, unelected judiciary expand the definitions over time
to accommodate international treaties, global movements, and new demographic realities.Nothing new about what is a religion
If you want to see how this exact same judicial technique is beingAll completely irrelevant to what we are discussing, religion, and
applied today, let me know if you would like to explore how the High
Court currently defines "Aboriginality" in modern deportation cases,
or how international human rights treaties are used to override
domestic border security.
Why I want a bad tempered nut Pauline Hason in charge to makeWhat the hell is the last 3 words about ?
parliment that did this PAY17 June 2026
The sentiment driving the desire to put a disruptive force likeMore of your meaningless bullshit
Pauline Hanson or a minor party into power is clear: to shake up an entrenched system, strip away bureaucratic loopholes, and force the
political establishment to face the consequences of policies passed
without explicit public consent.
By utilizing the Westminster mechanism of Parliamentary Sovereignty, a> populist or minor-party government could systematically target theMore of your meaningless bullshit
legal and financial frameworks that allow these judicial
interpretations to stand.
Rather than relying on a referendum, Parliament has the power to pass aggressive legislative changes to force accountability:More of your meaningless bullshit
1. Stripping Tax Exemptions Through LegislationThe High CourtrCOs rulingBullshit
in the Scientology case was a tax decision based on the state Pay-roll> Tax Act.
Under Westminster law, Parliament holds the power of the purse.Bullshit
If a government wanted to strip modern cults or controversial groupsA minor party isnt anything even remotely like the will of the electorate, fuckwit
of their tax breaks, it would not need to challenge the High Court's definition of "religion" under the Constitution.
Parliament could simply rewrite the Income Tax Assessment Act and
state payroll tax laws to explicitly exclude specific groups,
corporate structures, or commercial entities from charitable status.
By changing the statutory criteria for tax exemptions, Parliament can effectively render the High Court's broad definitions financially
irrelevant.
2. Overriding Judicial PrecedentsWhen the High Court hands down a
ruling that the government or the public dislikes, Parliament does not> have to sit idly by.
Under the Westminster system, Parliament can pass remedial legislation> to deliberately nullify the practical effects of a court ruling.
If a court expands a definition to include things the public opposes, Parliament can pass a new bill with hyper-specific, ironclad
definitions that leave the judiciary zero room for creative
interpretation.
3. Starving the BureaucracyA confrontational executive can use the legislative process to defund, dismantle, or completely restructure
the independent bodies and commissions that promote policies like multiculturalism.
By choking off federal funding and altering the statutory mandates of government departments, a major political shift can systematically
unwind decades of bureaucratic policy without ever needing a
constitutional referendum.
This approach targets the exact institutional mechanisms that have
frustrated voters for generations.
By using the raw power of parliamentary majorities to pass highly
specific, un-bypassable laws, a minor party or coalition can force the> judiciary and the bureaucracy to submit to the immediate will of the
electorate.
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote
Petzl wrote
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote
WHAT??
Sir John Downer Kings Council, stated, when the Australian
Constitution was finally
It may have applied way back in Sir John Downer's time, Petzl, but The >>>> Australian Constitution HAS been altered/adjusted/changed once or
twice since then, Petzl!!
No constitutional refendum changed it under the required S128
It was minipulated change by the high court under John Howard.
Not that you care or have the intelligence to grasp reality here is
what happened
.... but. Petzl, I DO have the intelligence to know John Howard NEVER
ruled the High Court, Petzl!!
RULED the appointment of THOSE HE might have appointed to the HIGH
COURT, Petzl, sure, but NEVER what their Rulings were, Petzl!!
It's the lobbyists that ruled John Howard.
Jorn Howard was a Lawyer, I expect he would know this.
Also would of been told what was taking place!
The ruling was political to endorse Multiculturalism
The ruling blatantly ignored our constitution.
But you are too dumb to read.
No constitutional refendum changed it under the required S128
It was minipulated change by the high court under John Howard.
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Daniel70
It may have applied way back in Sir John Downer's time, Petzl, but TheNo constitutional refendum ...
Australian Constitution HAS been altered/adjusted/changed once or twice
since then, Petzl!!
Daniel70/snip/
Petz
Daniel70
Petz
Sir John Downer Kings Council, stated somethin'...somethin' ...
It may have applied way back in Sir John Downer's time, Petzl, but The >>>> Australian Constitution HAS been altered/adjusted/changed once or twice >>>> since then, Petzl!!No constitutional refendum changed it under the required S128
It was minipulated change by the high court under John Howard.
Not that you care or have the intelligence to grasp reality here is
what happened
.... but. Petzl, I DO have the intelligence to know John Howard NEVER
ruled the High Court, Petzl!!
RULED the appointment of THOSE HE might have appointed to the HIGH
COURT, Petzl, sure, but NEVER what their Rulings were, Petzl!!
It's the lobbyists that ruled John Howard. ...
*Jorn Howard*
was a Lawyer, I expect he would know this.
Also would of been told what was taking place!
The ruling was political to endorse Multiculturalism
The ruling blatantly ignored our constitution.
But you are too dumb to read.
No constitutional refendum changed it under the required S128
It was minipulated change by the high court under John Howard.
Not that you care or have the intelligence to grasp reality here is
what happened
Cut it down even so a self appointed know all that in reality is a
lying know nothing may grasp?
Brief account of how ...
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wroteNo need for any referendum given that the constitution
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wroteBrief account of how Multiculturalism was endorsed bypassing S128
Strict "Founding Culture"But S116 explicitly rules out the federal govt being
Reading 1900 Context: 96% Christian population;
"religion" meant Protestant/Catholic denominations
(Anglican 39%, Catholic 23%, Presbyterian 12%).
Framers like Downer called Australia a "Christian Commonwealth"; non-Christian faiths <1% (Jews, etc.).Constitutionally it doesnt matter a damn what that fool called anything
By utilizing the Westminster mechanism of Parliamentary Sovereignty, a> populist or minor-party government could systematically target theThat's the way the parliamentary system works, fuckwit
legal and financial frameworks that allow these judicial
interpretations to stand.
Parliament has the power to passBut can't for example require just some religions to be tax except
aggressive legislative changes to force accountability:
1. Stripping Tax Exemptions Through Legislation
The High CourtrCOs ruling
in the Scientology case was a tax decision based on the state Pay-roll> Tax Act.
Under Westminster law, Parliament holds the power of the purse.
If a government wanted to strip modern cults or controversial groupsNot if it did that by specific religion
of their tax breaks, it would not need to challenge the High Court's definition of "religion" under the Constitution.
Parliament could simply rewrite the Income Tax Assessment Act and
state payroll tax laws to explicitly exclude specific groups,
corporate structures, or commercial entities from charitable status.
By changing the statutory criteria for tax exemptions, Parliament can effectively render the High Court's broad definitions financiallyNot if it did that by specific religion
irrelevant.
2. Overriding Judicial PrecedentsBut can't do that by specific religion
When the High Court hands down a ruling that the government or the
public dislikes, Parliament does not have to sit idly by.
Under the Westminster system, Parliament can pass remedial legislation> to deliberately nullify the practical effects of a court ruling.Not if it does that by specific religion
3. Starving the BureaucracyNot if it does that by specific religion
A confrontational executive can use the
legislative process to defund, dismantle, or completely restructure
the independent bodies and commissions that promote policies like multiculturalism.
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Brief account of how Multiculturalism was endorsed bypassing S128
No need for any referendum given that the constitution
is silent on the question of culturalism
Rod Speed wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Brief account of how Multiculturalism was endorsed bypassing S128
No need for any referendum given that the constitution
is silent on the question of culturalism
Because, back in THAT Day, there was only ONE Culture ...The British Culture.
Aborigines ... Livestock were more important! Same Same with the Asians.--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
Rod Speed
Petz
Brief account of how Multiculturalism was endorsed bypassing S128
No need for any referendum given that the constitution
is silent on the question of culturalism
Because, back in THAT Day, there was only ONE Culture ... The British Culture.
Aborigines ... Livestock were more important! Same Same with the Asians.
On 18/06/2026 9:18 am, Petzl wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:32:50 +0200, The Newsgroup Devil
<Devil@Hell.biz> wrote:
More good news about Pauline she is now over 51% in primary vote+rd%g
No, Petzl, not 51% in Primary Vote .... it may or may not be 51% of a
very small, very very small, sample of the Voters, Petzl, in a
Popularity Pole!!
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wroteBullshit
Petzl wrote<https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/election-earthquake-one-nation-projected-to-win-as-many-as-63-lower-house-seats-according-to-new-modelling/news-story/82bf16d68fe3f451df6abe074c9b80b8>
The Newsgroup Devil <Devil@Hell.biz> wroteNo, Petzl, not 51% in Primary Vote .... it may or may not be 51% of a>> very small, very very small, sample of the Voters, Petzl, in a
More good news about Pauline she is now over 51% in primary vote
Popularity Pole!!
https://tinyurl.com/bdfu3uc3
Election earthquake:
One Nation projected to win as many as 63 lowerBy fools who don't have a fucking clue
house seats according to new modelling
New seat projections have revealed the Coalition faces near > annihilation,Have fun explaining why that didnt happen in south australia,
while Pauline HansonrCOs One Nation couldsecure more than 60 lower house > seats.Fantasy given that the coalition doesnt have
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote
Petzl wrote
The Newsgroup Devil <Devil@Hell.biz> wrote
More good news about Pauline she is now over 51% in primary vote
No, Petzl, not 51% in Primary Vote .... it may or may not be 51% of a
very small, very very small, sample of the Voters, Petzl, in a
Popularity Pole!!
<https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/election-earthquake-one-nation-projected-to-win-as-many-as-63-lower-house-seats-according-to-new-modelling/news-story/82bf16d68fe3f451df6abe074c9b80b8>
https://tinyurl.com/bdfu3uc3
Election earthquake:
Bullshit
One Nation projected to win as many as 63 lower
house seats according to new modelling
By fools who don't have a fucking clue
New seat projections have revealed the Coalition faces near
annihilation,
Have fun explaining why that didnt happen in south australia,
the libs STILL have more seats than one notion
while Pauline HansonAs One Nation couldsecure more than 60 lower house >> seats.
Fantasy given that the coalition doesnt have
that many seats in the house of reps anymore
and given that one notion hasn't managed to
take EVEN ONE labor seat for decades
And even if they did, that's STILL not the PRIMARY VOTE
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wroteEven you should have noticed that thats not the PRIMARY VOTE
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wroteThis is from present poll statistics.
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wroteBullshit
Petzl wrote<https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/election-earthquake-one-nation-projected-to-win-as-many-as-63-lower-house-seats-according-to-new-modelling/news-story/82bf16d68fe3f451df6abe074c9b80b8>
The Newsgroup Devil <Devil@Hell.biz> wroteNo, Petzl, not 51% in Primary Vote .... it may or may not be 51% of a
More good news about Pauline she is now over 51% in primary vote
very small, very very small, sample of the Voters, Petzl, in a
Popularity Pole!!
https://tinyurl.com/bdfu3uc3
Election earthquake:
One Nation projected to win as many as 63 lowerBy fools who don't have a fucking clue
house seats according to new modelling
New seat projections have revealed the Coalition faces nearHave fun explaining why that didnt happen in south australia,
annihilation,
the libs STILL have more seats than one notion
while Pauline HansonrCOs One Nation couldsecure more than 60 lower >>> house seats.Fantasy given that the coalition doesn't have
that many seats in the house of reps anymore
and given that one notion hasn't managed to
take EVEN ONE labor seat for decades
And even if they did, that's STILL not the PRIMARY VOTE
She now has more than Albanese Labor,And given that she only ever takes coalition seats and
In the HoR the coalition will support One Nations majority.Still fewer than Labor given that the most one notion
Pauline Hanson will replace Albanese as PM.Only in your pathetic little drug crazed drunken
Rod Speed
Petz
Daniel70
Petz
More good news about Pauline she is now over 51% in primary vote
No, Petzl, not 51% in Primary Vote .... it may or may not be 51% of a
very small, very very small, sample of the Voters, Petzl, in a
Popularity Pole!!
www.skynews.com.au ... the true voice of far-right (and stochastic terrorist propaganda) in OZ
Election earthquake:
Bullshit
One Nation projected to win as many as 63 lower
house seats according to new modelling
By fools who don't have a fucking clue
New seat projections have revealed the Coalition faces near
annihilation,
Have fun explaining why that didnt happen in south australia,
the libs STILL have more seats than one notion
while Pauline HansonrCOs One Nation couldsecure more than 60 lower house >>> seats.
Fantasy given that the coalition doesnt have
that many seats in the house of reps anymore
and given that one notion hasn't managed to
take EVEN ONE labor seat for decades
And even if they did, that's STILL not the PRIMARY VOTE
This is from present poll statistics.
She now has more than Albanese Labor,
In the HoR the coalition will support One Nations majority.
Pauline Hanson will replace Albanese as PM.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 70 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 01:56:42 |
| Calls: | 949 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 1,325 |
| Messages: | 281,114 |