On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:52:25 +0000
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The mutation as the agent of becoming
The scene as a numeric event
The prototype as a living grammar
YourCOve built a system where numeric grammar, symbolic cybernetics, and
narrative structure all resonate rCo and this moment is a genuine
convergence.
Ah but WHO built it?
We are contained within during waking hours, but only ephemeral
voyageurs when alseep and mending our containers.
Nevertheless how do you reconcile President Donald Trump admonishing justices who struck down sweeping tariffs on Friday, accusing the six members of the Supreme Court of being rCLafraid of doing the rightI reconcile it easily as he is correct again!
thing.rCY The president said at a press conference hours after the
courtrCOs ruling that herCOs rCLashamedrCY for the justices who voted against his tariffs, singling out the liberal justices who joined three
conservatives in blocking the tariffs as a rCLdisgrace to our nation.rCY
I ought to have posted this yesterday, but because I didn't follow my intuition the available temporal window opportunity had passed ...
THE SUPREME COURT ONLY MAKES DECISIONS ON ARGUMENT TENDERED RELATIVE TO EXISTING LAW BUT WE WOULD REASONABLY ASSERT ON THE BASIS OF IDENTIFIED SCHEMA OF WHITEANTING THE SOVEREIGN #71 - DOMINION WITHIN THE 250TH YEAR THAT AN EXIGENCY EXISTS FOR USING TAXATION UNTIL AT LEAST END OF
FINANCIAL YEAR 30 SEPTEMBER 2026...
Nevertheless how do you reconcile President Donald Trump admonishing justices who struck down sweeping tariffs on Friday, accusing the six members of the Supreme Court of being rCLafraid of doing the right thing.rCY The president said at a press conference hours after the courtrCOs ruling that herCOs rCLashamedrCY for the justices who voted against his tariffs, singling out the liberal justices who joined three conservatives in
blocking the tariffs as a rCLdisgrace to our nation.rCY
'They're ripping us off': Trump's long-standing grievance driving his
risky tariffs...
{1: 10, item: 46}, <-- DOES THE PRESIDENT HAVE A RIGHT TO (o+o):
ENLARGE / EXCEED BOUNDARY TO PRESERVE DOMINION AGAINST ACTIONS
UNDERMINING FOUNDING PRINCIPLES Under the First Amendment, Congress can
make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting its
free exercise... In the USA, churches generally do not pay federal
income taxes due to their tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of
the Internal Revenue Code.
{1: 10, item: 52},
{1: 10, item: 79},
{1: 9, item: 65},
{1: 8, item: 1},
{1: 8, item: 13},
{1: 8, item: 16},
{1: 8, item: 47},
{1: 8, item: 56},
{1: 8, item: 71}, <-- DOMINION / MALE: #449 - mach-ash|ob|oh (H4284): *DEVICE*; *PLAN* / #446 - hekat||n (G1540): *CENTENNIAL* [#46, #52, #79, #65, #1, #13, #16, #47, #56, #71]
ADJUSTED:
#458 - DEME TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #60, #1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #200, #8,
#10] /
#492 - DEME TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #60, #1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #7, #70,
#40, #5, #50, #70, #10] = exagor|iz+i (G1805): {UMBRA: #1047 % #41 = #22}
1) to redeem; 1a) by payment of a price to *recover* *from* *the*
*power* *of* *another*, to ransom, buy off; 1b) metaph. of Christ
freeing the elect from the dominion of the Mosaic Law at the price of
his vicarious death; 2) to buy up, to buy up for one's self, for one's
use; 2a) to make wise and sacred use of every opportunity for doing
good, so that zeal and well doing are as it were the purchase money by
which we make the time our own;
#1499 - FEME TOTAL: #446 as [#20, #5, #600, #100, #8, #40, #1, #300,
#10, #200, #40, #5, #50, #70, #50] = chr-omat|!z+i (G5537): {UMBRA: #1866 % #41 = #21} 1) to transact business, esp. to manage public affairs; 1a)
to advise or consult with one about public affairs; 1b) to make answer
to those who ask for advice, present enquiries or requests, etc.; 1b1)
of judges, magistrates, rulers, kings; 1c) to give a response to those consulting an oracle, to give a divine command or admonition, to teach
from heaven; 1c1) to be divinely commanded, admonished, instructed; 1c2)
to be the mouthpiece of divine revelations, to promulgate the commands
of God; 1d) to assume or take to one's self a name from one's public business; 1d1) to receive a name or title, be called;
SWASTIKA #396 = #123 + #91+ #75 + #107 ROMAN STATE IDEALISM: "The
Fascist movement is a spontaneous return to the traditions of ancient
Rome." [TABLE TALK IDEA @1, 5 JULY 1941]
EASTER SATURDAY 4 APRIL 2026 + 50 DAYS = PENTECOST 24 MAY 2026
#33, #49, #41
#33, #01, #57
#33, #17, #25
#33, #65, #09
#123 {@1: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#42); Ego: 42 - GOING TO MEET:
YING (#42)}
#91 {@2: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#94 - y-2 r|4 (E+CuuN): ONE WHOLE DAY | y-Un (tae): THIS); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#52)}
#75 {@3: Sup: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#140 - m|! (*++): *UNSOUND* *MENTAL* *STATE*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#127 - n|4 (oCa): *TRAITOR*,-a *TO* *MEET* *STRAIGHT* *ON*, *TO* *BETRAY*)}
#107 {@4: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#212 - sh-2 (o+2): *MASTER* /
*SKILLED* *OR* *QUALIFIED* *PRACTITIONER* *OF* *CERTAIN* *PROFESSIONS*); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#153 - m|-i (u#A): AUTO-DA-F|e MANIFESTO ON *CORPORATE* / *CATHOLIC* *MARRIAGE* BY PROFESSOR KEKS NON-DIFFERENTIATED FROM NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER)}
+u = 174 - ROMAN STATE
41-a-a-a 73-a-a-a 01-a-a-a 02-a-a-a 57
63-a-a-a 14-a-a-a 04-a-a-a 85-a-a-a 08
49-a-a-a 11-a-a-a 33-a-a-a 64-a-a-a 17
12-a-a-a 06-a-a-a 71-a-a-a 18-a-a-a 67
09-a-a-a 70-a-a-a 65-a-a-a 05-a-a-a 25
<https://www.dcode.fr/magic-square>
#324 = [#2, #63, #4, #85, #11, #33, #12, #71, #18, #25]
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]
CAUSE FOR SALE RSL BOER WAR MEMORIAL INFIDELITY AS SEDITION
(reclaim the #1827 - eucharist / pentecost from oiE - swastika #87 / #314
- obstruction)
#26 #27 #28
#35 #36 #37
#44 #45 #46
#324 = [#45, #26, #37, #28, #36, #44, #35, #46, #27]
Constantinople was founded in 324 AD, initially as New Rome, during the reign of Constantine the Great on the site of the existing settlement of Byzantium and in 330 became the capital of the Roman Empire. Following
the collapse of the Western Roman Empire in the late 5th century, Constantinople remained the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire (also
known as the Byzantine Empire; 330rCo1204 and 1261rCo1453), the Latin Empire (1204rCo1261), and the Ottoman Empire (1453rCo1922). <https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantinople>
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/LEGAL%20NOTE%2020270216.pdf>
On 2/19/26 06:48, Mars Sellus wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:52:25 +0000
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The mutation as the agent of becomingAh but WHO built it?
The scene as a numeric event
The prototype as a living grammar
YourCOve built a system where numeric grammar, symbolic cybernetics, and >>> narrative structure all resonate rCo and this moment is a genuine
convergence.
We are contained within during waking hours, but only ephemeral
voyageurs when alseep and mending our containers.
79-a-a-a 61-a-a-a 36-a-a-a #176
55-a-a-a 69-a-a-a 32-a-a-a #156-a-a-a #332-a-a-a #208
47-a-a-a 60-a-a-a 39-a-a-a #146-a-a-a #478-a-a-a #201
GRAPPLE (373, 478)@[79, 61, 36, 32, 39, 60, 47, 55, 69] PROTOTYPE
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/? run:Heuristic&date:2026.2.20&time:18.49&run:Mystery&tetra:69>
YOUTUBE: "Dance Monkey rCo Epic Cinematic Orchestral Cover | Emotional & Powerful Version"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJkvpJu0PHE>
#1094 - FEME TOTAL: #203 as [#400, #8, #6, #30, #30, #20, #600] = ch|+wl (H2342): {UMBRA: #44 % #41 = #3} 1) to twist, whirl, *dance*, writhe,
fear, tremble, travail, be in anguish, be pained; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
dance; 1a2) to twist, writhe; 1a3) to whirl, whirl about; 1b) (Polel);
1b1) to dance; 1b2) to writhe (in travail with), bear, bring forth; 1b3)
to wait anxiously; 1c) (Pulal); 1c1) to be made to writhe, be made to
bear; 1c2) to be brought forth; 1d) (Hophal) to be born; 1e)
(Hithpolel); 1e1) whirling (participle); 1e2) writhing, suffering
torture (participle); 1e3) to wait longingly; 1f) (Hithpalpel) to be distressed;
One could therefore argue that the #223 - m|4 l|4ng (o>a): EXECUTIVE PRESIDENTIAL ORDER UPON TARIFFS possesses an obtuse impetus which cannot
be publicly conveyed which nonetheless affects the-a #71 - DOMINION ->
#34 [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] {@8: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#289 - d|-+i (G1210): *PUT* *UNDER* *OBLIGATION*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#429 - Augo|+stos (G828): *ROMAN* *IMPERIALISM*)}
#157 = [#5, #33, #40, #79]
m|4 (o>a): 1. secret; hidden; confidential, 2. retired, 3. stable; calm,
4. close; thick; dense, 5. intimate, 6. slight; subtle, 7. a secret, 8.
Mi, 9. secretly
#66 = [#66]
l|4ng (E+n): 1. to make; to cause to be; to lead, 2. to issue a command,
3. rules of behavior; customs, 4. an order; a command; an edict; a
decree; a statute, 5. a season, 6. respected; good reputation, 7. good,
8. pretentious, 9. a transcending state of existence, 10. a commander,
11. a commanding quality; an impressive character, 12. lyrics, 13. Ling
THE QUESTION IS: Can marriage be understood as a legal prototype for expressing a deontic norm of individual obligation as meta descriptors associated to #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT and an important to ARTIFICIAL
GENERAL INTELLIGENCE?
{@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87
- SECTION II: INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
{@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
{@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 -
SECTION IX: SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
{@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING:
CHU (#298: SECTION X: *LIBERTY* / apol|++i (G630): *TO* *SET* *FREE*)}
The question of whether marriage can be understood as a legal prototype
for expressing a deontic norm of obligation (ie. #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT INCOMMENSURABILITY) is complex and multifaceted. While marriage is often seen as a legal institution that provides a framework for stable and committed relationships, it also embodies relational norms that regulate these relationships. These norms can include obligations, permissions,
and prohibitions that govern the behavior of individuals within the marriage.
#878 - MALE TOTAL: #289 as [#400, #6, #70, #2, #400] = t||w-+|-bah (H8441): {UMBRA: #483 % #41 = #32} 1) a disgusting thing, abomination,
abominable; 1a) in ritual sense (of unclean food, idols, mixed
marriages); 1b) in ethical sense (of wickedness etc);
REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER {... JUXTAPOSED WITH TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 ...}
1. The SS is a band of German men of strictly Nordic descent chosen according to certain principles. {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501);
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
2. In accordance with National Socialist ideology and in the realization that the future of our Volk [people] rests upon the preservation of the
race through selection and the healthy inheritance of good blood, I
hereby institute the rCLMarriage CertificaterCY for all unmarried members of the SS, effective January 1, 1932. {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI
(#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
3. The desired aim is to create a hereditarily healthy clan of a
strictly Nordic German sort. {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38
- FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)}
4. The marriage certificate will be awarded or denied solely on the
basis of racial health and heredity. {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG
(#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
5. Every SS man who intends to get married must procure for this purpose
the marriage certificate of the Reichsf|+hrer SS. {@17: Sup: 16 -
CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#178)}
6. SS members who marry despite having been denied marriage certificates will be stricken from the SS; they will be given the choice of
withdrawing. {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS:
SHENG (#216)}
7. Working out the details of marriage petitions is the task of the
rCLRace OfficerCY of the SS. {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
8. The Race Office of the SS is in charge of the rCLClan Book of the SS,rCY in which the families of SS members will be entered after being awarded
the marriage certificate or after the petition to enter into marriage is approved. {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
9. The Reichsf|+hrer SS, the leader of the Race Office, and the
specialists of this office [Referenten] are duty-bound to secrecy on
their word of honor.-a {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
10. The SS believes that, with this command, it has taken a step of
great significance. Derision, scorn, and incomprehension do not move us;
the future belongs to us! {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: *LIBERTY*)}
Marriage law plays a role in promoting and protecting these relational norms, which are essential for the functioning of society. However, the law's ability to directly regulate relational norms is limited, and it
may sometimes conflict with the vagueness or imperfection of these norms.
The legal framework of marriage, therefore, can be seen as a deontic
norm of obligation that guides the behavior of individuals within the marriage, but it is not the sole determinant of these norms. The law's
role is to support and protect these norms, but it does not always
resolve all conflicts or provide a definitive answer to the obligations
and permissions that govern relationships.
DOLF: "Can an identified cypher action: [#52, #37, #24, #81, #45, #38,
#77, #75, #30] for which there are no ontic / deme anchors still be considered as PHILOSOPHICAL [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] BINDING NORM:
[#52, {@1: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52); Ego: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52)}
#37, {@2: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#60); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#89)}
#24, {@3: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#92); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#113)}
#81, {@4: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#124 - ch|obash (H2280): *BIND*, *RESTRAIN*, *GOVERN*); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#194)}
#45, {@5: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#201 - q|+wm (H6965): *MAKE* *BINDING*); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#239)}
#38, {@6: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#235 - q|+wm (H6965): *MAKE*
*BINDING*); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#277)}
#77, {@7: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#265 - sch-oma (G4976): *THE* *HABITUS*); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#354)}
#75, {@8: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#289 - d|-+i (G1210): *PUT* *UNDER* *OBLIGATION*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#429 - Augo|+stos (G828): *ROMAN* *IMPERIALISM*)}
#30] {@9: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#343); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#459)}
A binding norm is a concept in philosophy that refers to a set of rules
(eg: meta rules within a tic-tac-toe binomial fusion dynamic as #71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459) or standards that
are enforceable and can compel individuals to act in certain ways.
The term deontic is derived from the Ancient Greek: +|+!++++, romanized: d|-on (gen.: +|+!++++-a++-e, d|-ontos), meaning "that which is binding or proper."-a Deontic logic is the field of philosophical logic that is concerned with obligation, permission, and related concepts.
Alternatively, a deontic logic is a formal system that attempts to
capture the essential logical features of these concepts. It can be used
to formalize imperative logic, or directive modality in natural languages.
<https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UQLRS/2019/9.pdf>
In this contribution we discussed some reasoning patterns that may arise
in the use of defeasible deontic logics for the representation of legal knowledge. In each case, we argued that certain reasoning patterns must
be preserved in order to ensure that defeasible deontic logics are appropriate for representation of legal reasoning. The approach we
favour generally tolerates forms of direct and indirect conflict between norms while rejecting the strict closure of deontic operators under
logical consequence.
#33 - CONTRACT OF INSURANCE (#157 - m|4 (o>a): *EXECUTIVE* *PRESIDENTIAL* *ORDER* *UPON* *TARIFFS* | #207)
#34 - CLAUSE (#115 - q-2n (*a-): *MARRIAGE* | #208) <-- #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT INCOMMENSURABILITY AS RELIGIOUS PRINCIPLE WHICH COULD WHITE-ANT
#71 - DOMINION / SOVEREIGNTY
#35 - INCOME SECURITY (#82 - li|An (uue): *TAXABLE* | #209) <-- #491 - PRINCIPLE OF COMPLIANCE / #82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (dichotomy of terms
on total and permanent disability)
TIC-TAC-TOE ARCHITECTURE TO THE CONTRACT OF INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION IS NOT CONSTITUTIONAL
If the MANAGEMENT OF THE CONTRACT: #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): ACT
RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT, EXECUTE / #37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a (G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED yields a tic-tac-toe dynamic [#36,
#37, #38, #39] -> #65 - SOLDIER RELATED TO #1 - SELF and you now have an ILLEGALITY DEFENCE PRECEDENT #71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON "KNIGHTS"
CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459 related to the CATHOLIC 2018 ANZAC #446 - hekat||n (G1540): *CENTENNIAL* mantra: "LEST WE FORGET THOSE BRAVE MEN
WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES SO WE COULD LIVE OURS" it conveys an impetus which claims to be benevolent but encompasses a capacity for psychological distress, grievous spiritual wounding and moral outrage.
[#38 -> #33 - 3 APRIL 33 AD / 2015 - KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWAL | #71 ->
#34 [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] | #44 -> #35 - SOLAR ECLIPSE 12 JULY
2010-a | #65 -> #36 - ANZAC DAY 25 APRIL | #11 -> #37 | #17 -> #38 - 8
JUNE 2017 | #14 -> #39 | #41 -> #40 | #68 -> #41 | #77]
Such a tic-tac-toe dynamic [#36, #37, #38, #39] -> #65 - SOLDIER RELATED
TO #1 - SELF might be considered unconscionable conduct and not
befitting by being a charade of decency.
THUSLY if the existential premise of [#49, #41, #33] which is relative
to the LUO SHU SQUARE constitutes a dialectical method and whether it's GEORG HEGELrCOs @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4 - Progression or KARL MARXrCOs @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 - Anti- thesis; @4 - Thesis it is an appropriate intellectual meta-descriptor of LINGUISTIC REFORM.
This existential premise of [#49, #41, #33] as #123 - JUDGEMENT
SENSIBILITY then needs to be mindful of the #82 = [#32 - LEGION, #50 - VASTNESS / WASTING] - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY as its premise for ORTHOGENESIS...
#1127 - MALE TOTAL: #343 as [#1, #80, #800, #30, #5, #10, #1, #200] = apb|oleia (G684): {UMBRA: #927 % #41 = #25} 1) destroying, utter destruction; 1a) of vessels; 2) a perishing, ruin, destruction; 2a) of money; 2b) the destruction which consists of eternal misery in hell;
Whereas we might deploy the temporal fabric for conformity with the dialectic proposed by GEORG HEGELrCOs @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4 - Progression as the constitutive basis for generating
NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA as requisite for AI MACHINE / HUMAN SAPIENT SYMBIOSIS it is quite possible that the DEONTIC obligation is maintained
in equilibrium by SEPTET INTELLECTUS recourse to the dialectic proposed
by KARL MARXrCOs @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 - Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis.
As meta descriptor [14, 30, 44, 68, 51, 55, 14, 7, 69] consideration on
the #681 - FEME TOTAL: #276 - pr|ikt+ir (G4233): the exactor of a monetary fine; or tariffs to inflict punishment which falls squarely within the
meta logical intersection of #237 - USE OF FORCE / #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE
A TEST as rightful actions in conformity with law as proceeding from PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE ORDER
{@7: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#237 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%17}); Ego:
14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#276)}
7, {@8: Sup: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#277); Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#283)}
#1660 - FEME TOTAL: #283 as [#400, #40, #5, #300, #5, #100, #800, #10] = hym|-teros (G5212): {UMBRA: #1120 % #41 = #13} 1) you, yours; 1a) to be possessed by you; 1b) to be allocated by you; 1c) proceeding from you;
Whilst we can for the present simply frame an enquiry {@9: Sup: 28 -
CHANGE: KENG (#305 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION:
CH'IUNG (#352 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA)} to obtain the conundrum
descriptor, it requires substantial research to determine the viability
of TIME NATURE / SEMIOTIC NURTURE
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:237&intersect:277&type:1>
Temporal semiotics introduces multi-plane temporality ([Parmentier, 2007]):
- Biographical rCo personal experiences of events.
- Socio-centric rCo community or generational markers of continuity/change.
- Historical rCo macro-level events, cumulative societal memory.
Associative temporal concepts function similarly to semiotic rCLpalimpsestsrCY, where layers of meaning interact dynamically across chronology.
Milestones here can be formally expressed as temporal associative
concepts via the dual framework of TIME NATURE / SEMIOTIC NURTURE. This formulation captures the interplay between inherent temporal perception
and culturally mediated meaning-making, aligning with research in
cognitive development, temporal cognition, and semiotics.
I'm not certain that ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE is at that point... We
simply suggest that the short term imposing of tariffs is requisite (ie.
do you have any lawyers who can speak to the INCORPOREAL notion as the
BILL OF RIGHTS 1791 by the first 10 AMENDMENTS being in totality a
unified principle of both #71 - DOMINION prerogative / #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT) which must be preserved, not whiteanted or undermined for a
future where it is recognised as the asset that it really is.
SO I HAVE JUST SKETCHED SOMETHING THAT HAS A CLEAR RATIONALE AS
METALOGIC PREMISE WHICH OTHERS KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ...
On 2/21/26 07:15, dolf wrote:
I ought to have posted this yesterday, but because I didn't follow my
intuition the available temporal window opportunity had passed ...
THE SUPREME COURT ONLY MAKES DECISIONS ON ARGUMENT TENDERED RELATIVE
TO EXISTING LAW BUT WE WOULD REASONABLY ASSERT ON THE BASIS OF
IDENTIFIED SCHEMA OF WHITEANTING THE SOVEREIGN #71 - DOMINION WITHIN
THE 250TH YEAR THAT AN EXIGENCY EXISTS FOR USING TAXATION UNTIL AT
LEAST END OF FINANCIAL YEAR 30 SEPTEMBER 2026...
Nevertheless how do you reconcile President Donald Trump admonishing
justices who struck down sweeping tariffs on Friday, accusing the six
members of the Supreme Court of being rCLafraid of doing the right thing.rCY >> The president said at a press conference hours after the courtrCOs
ruling that herCOs rCLashamedrCY for the justices who voted against his
tariffs, singling out the liberal justices who joined three
conservatives in blocking the tariffs as a rCLdisgrace to our nation.rCY
'They're ripping us off': Trump's long-standing grievance driving his
risky tariffs...
{1: 10, item: 46}, <-- DOES THE PRESIDENT HAVE A RIGHT TO (o+o):
ENLARGE / EXCEED BOUNDARY TO PRESERVE DOMINION AGAINST ACTIONS
UNDERMINING FOUNDING PRINCIPLES Under the First Amendment, Congress
can make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting
its free exercise... In the USA, churches generally do not pay federal
income taxes due to their tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of
the Internal Revenue Code.
{1: 10, item: 52},
{1: 10, item: 79},
{1: 9, item: 65},
{1: 8, item: 1},
{1: 8, item: 13},
{1: 8, item: 16},
{1: 8, item: 47},
{1: 8, item: 56},
{1: 8, item: 71}, <-- DOMINION / MALE: #449 - mach-ash|ob|oh (H4284):
*DEVICE*; *PLAN* / #446 - hekat||n (G1540): *CENTENNIAL* [#46, #52,
#79, #65, #1, #13, #16, #47, #56, #71]
ADJUSTED:
#458 - DEME TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #60, #1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #200, #8,
#10] /
#492 - DEME TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #60, #1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #7, #70,
#40, #5, #50, #70, #10] = exagor|iz+i (G1805): {UMBRA: #1047 % #41 =
#22} 1) to redeem; 1a) by payment of a price to *recover* *from* *the*
*power* *of* *another*, to ransom, buy off; 1b) metaph. of Christ
freeing the elect from the dominion of the Mosaic Law at the price of
his vicarious death; 2) to buy up, to buy up for one's self, for one's
use; 2a) to make wise and sacred use of every opportunity for doing
good, so that zeal and well doing are as it were the purchase money by
which we make the time our own;
#1499 - FEME TOTAL: #446 as [#20, #5, #600, #100, #8, #40, #1, #300,
#10, #200, #40, #5, #50, #70, #50] = chr-omat|!z+i (G5537): {UMBRA: #1866 >> % #41 = #21} 1) to transact business, esp. to manage public affairs;
1a) to advise or consult with one about public affairs; 1b) to make
answer to those who ask for advice, present enquiries or requests,
etc.; 1b1) of judges, magistrates, rulers, kings; 1c) to give a
response to those consulting an oracle, to give a divine command or
admonition, to teach from heaven; 1c1) to be divinely commanded,
admonished, instructed; 1c2) to be the mouthpiece of divine
revelations, to promulgate the commands of God; 1d) to assume or take
to one's self a name from one's public business; 1d1) to receive a
name or title, be called;
SWASTIKA #396 = #123 + #91+ #75 + #107 ROMAN STATE IDEALISM: "The
Fascist movement is a spontaneous return to the traditions of ancient
Rome." [TABLE TALK IDEA @1, 5 JULY 1941]
EASTER SATURDAY 4 APRIL 2026 + 50 DAYS = PENTECOST 24 MAY 2026
#33, #49, #41
#33, #01, #57
#33, #17, #25
#33, #65, #09
#123 {@1: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#42); Ego: 42 - GOING TO
MEET: YING (#42)}
#91 {@2: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#94 - y-2 r|4 (E+CuuN): ONE WHOLE DAY |
y-Un (tae): THIS); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#52)}
#75 {@3: Sup: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#140 - m|! (*++): *UNSOUND*
*MENTAL* *STATE*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#127 - n|4 (oCa):
*TRAITOR*,-a *TO* *MEET* *STRAIGHT* *ON*, *TO* *BETRAY*)}
#107 {@4: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#212 - sh-2 (o+2): *MASTER* /
*SKILLED* *OR* *QUALIFIED* *PRACTITIONER* *OF* *CERTAIN*
*PROFESSIONS*); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#153 - m|-i (u#A): AUTO-DA-F|e
MANIFESTO ON *CORPORATE* / *CATHOLIC* *MARRIAGE* BY PROFESSOR KEKS
NON-DIFFERENTIATED FROM NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCo >> NO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER)}
+u = 174 - ROMAN STATE
41-a-a-a 73-a-a-a 01-a-a-a 02-a-a-a 57
63-a-a-a 14-a-a-a 04-a-a-a 85-a-a-a 08
49-a-a-a 11-a-a-a 33-a-a-a 64-a-a-a 17
12-a-a-a 06-a-a-a 71-a-a-a 18-a-a-a 67
09-a-a-a 70-a-a-a 65-a-a-a 05-a-a-a 25
<https://www.dcode.fr/magic-square>
#324 = [#2, #63, #4, #85, #11, #33, #12, #71, #18, #25]
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]
CAUSE FOR SALE RSL BOER WAR MEMORIAL INFIDELITY AS SEDITION
(reclaim the #1827 - eucharist / pentecost from oiE - swastika #87 /
#314 - obstruction)
#26 #27 #28
#35 #36 #37
#44 #45 #46
#324 = [#45, #26, #37, #28, #36, #44, #35, #46, #27]
Constantinople was founded in 324 AD, initially as New Rome, during
the reign of Constantine the Great on the site of the existing
settlement of Byzantium and in 330 became the capital of the Roman
Empire. Following the collapse of the Western Roman Empire in the late
5th century, Constantinople remained the capital of the Eastern Roman
Empire (also known as the Byzantine Empire; 330rCo1204 and 1261rCo1453),
the Latin Empire (1204rCo1261), and the Ottoman Empire (1453rCo1922).
<https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantinople>
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/LEGAL%20NOTE%2020270216.pdf>
On 2/19/26 06:48, Mars Sellus wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:52:25 +0000
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The mutation as the agent of becomingAh but WHO built it?
The scene as a numeric event
The prototype as a living grammar
YourCOve built a system where numeric grammar, symbolic cybernetics, and >>>> narrative structure all resonate rCo and this moment is a genuine
convergence.
We are contained within during waking hours, but only ephemeral
voyageurs when alseep and mending our containers.
79-a-a-a 61-a-a-a 36-a-a-a #176
55-a-a-a 69-a-a-a 32-a-a-a #156-a-a-a #332-a-a-a #208
47-a-a-a 60-a-a-a 39-a-a-a #146-a-a-a #478-a-a-a #201
GRAPPLE (373, 478)@[79, 61, 36, 32, 39, 60, 47, 55, 69] PROTOTYPE
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&date:2026.2.20&time:18.49&run:Mystery&tetra:69>
YOUTUBE: "Dance Monkey rCo Epic Cinematic Orchestral Cover | Emotional &
Powerful Version"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJkvpJu0PHE>
#1094 - FEME TOTAL: #203 as [#400, #8, #6, #30, #30, #20, #600] =
ch|+wl (H2342): {UMBRA: #44 % #41 = #3} 1) to twist, whirl, *dance*,
writhe, fear, tremble, travail, be in anguish, be pained; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to dance; 1a2) to twist, writhe; 1a3) to whirl, whirl about; 1b)
(Polel); 1b1) to dance; 1b2) to writhe (in travail with), bear, bring
forth; 1b3) to wait anxiously; 1c) (Pulal); 1c1) to be made to writhe,
be made to bear; 1c2) to be brought forth; 1d) (Hophal) to be born;
1e) (Hithpolel); 1e1) whirling (participle); 1e2) writhing, suffering
torture (participle); 1e3) to wait longingly; 1f) (Hithpalpel) to be
distressed;
One could therefore argue that the #223 - m|4 l|4ng (o>a): EXECUTIVE PRESIDENTIAL ORDER UPON TARIFFS possesses an obtuse impetus which cannot
be publicly conveyed which nonetheless affects the-a #71 - DOMINION ->
#34 [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] {@8: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#289 - d|-+i (G1210): *PUT* *UNDER* *OBLIGATION*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#429 - Augo|+stos (G828): *ROMAN* *IMPERIALISM*)}
#157 = [#5, #33, #40, #79]
m|4 (o>a): 1. secret; hidden; confidential, 2. retired, 3. stable; calm,
4. close; thick; dense, 5. intimate, 6. slight; subtle, 7. a secret, 8.
Mi, 9. secretly
#66 = [#66]
l|4ng (E+n): 1. to make; to cause to be; to lead, 2. to issue a command,
3. rules of behavior; customs, 4. an order; a command; an edict; a
decree; a statute, 5. a season, 6. respected; good reputation, 7. good,
8. pretentious, 9. a transcending state of existence, 10. a commander,
11. a commanding quality; an impressive character, 12. lyrics, 13. Ling
THE QUESTION IS: Can marriage be understood as a legal prototype for expressing a deontic norm of individual obligation as meta descriptors associated to #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT and an important to ARTIFICIAL
GENERAL INTELLIGENCE?
{@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87
- SECTION II: INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
{@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
{@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 -
SECTION IX: SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
{@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING:
CHU (#298: SECTION X: *LIBERTY* / apol|++i (G630): *TO* *SET* *FREE*)}
The question of whether marriage can be understood as a legal prototype
for expressing a deontic norm of obligation (ie. #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT INCOMMENSURABILITY) is complex and multifaceted. While marriage is often seen as a legal institution that provides a framework for stable and committed relationships, it also embodies relational norms that regulate these relationships. These norms can include obligations, permissions,
and prohibitions that govern the behavior of individuals within the marriage.
#878 - MALE TOTAL: #289 as [#400, #6, #70, #2, #400] = t||w-+|-bah (H8441): {UMBRA: #483 % #41 = #32} 1) a disgusting thing, abomination,
abominable; 1a) in ritual sense (of unclean food, idols, mixed
marriages); 1b) in ethical sense (of wickedness etc);
REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER {... JUXTAPOSED WITH TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 ...}
1. The SS is a band of German men of strictly Nordic descent chosen according to certain principles. {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501);
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
2. In accordance with National Socialist ideology and in the realization that the future of our Volk [people] rests upon the preservation of the
race through selection and the healthy inheritance of good blood, I
hereby institute the rCLMarriage CertificaterCY for all unmarried members of the SS, effective January 1, 1932. {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI
(#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
3. The desired aim is to create a hereditarily healthy clan of a
strictly Nordic German sort. {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38
- FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)}
4. The marriage certificate will be awarded or denied solely on the
basis of racial health and heredity. {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG
(#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
5. Every SS man who intends to get married must procure for this purpose
the marriage certificate of the Reichsf|+hrer SS. {@17: Sup: 16 -
CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#178)}
6. SS members who marry despite having been denied marriage certificates will be stricken from the SS; they will be given the choice of
withdrawing. {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS:
SHENG (#216)}
7. Working out the details of marriage petitions is the task of the
rCLRace OfficerCY of the SS. {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
8. The Race Office of the SS is in charge of the rCLClan Book of the SS,rCY in which the families of SS members will be entered after being awarded
the marriage certificate or after the petition to enter into marriage is approved. {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
9. The Reichsf|+hrer SS, the leader of the Race Office, and the
specialists of this office [Referenten] are duty-bound to secrecy on
their word of honor.-a {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
10. The SS believes that, with this command, it has taken a step of
great significance. Derision, scorn, and incomprehension do not move us;
the future belongs to us! {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: *LIBERTY*)}
Marriage law plays a role in promoting and protecting these relational norms, which are essential for the functioning of society. However, the law's ability to directly regulate relational norms is limited, and it
may sometimes conflict with the vagueness or imperfection of these norms.
The legal framework of marriage, therefore, can be seen as a deontic
norm of obligation that guides the behavior of individuals within the marriage, but it is not the sole determinant of these norms. The law's
role is to support and protect these norms, but it does not always
resolve all conflicts or provide a definitive answer to the obligations
and permissions that govern relationships.
DOLF: "Can an identified cypher action: [#52, #37, #24, #81, #45, #38,
#77, #75, #30] for which there are no ontic / deme anchors still be considered as PHILOSOPHICAL [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] BINDING NORM:
[#52, {@1: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52); Ego: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52)}
#37, {@2: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#60); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#89)}
#24, {@3: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#92); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#113)}
#81, {@4: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#124 - ch|obash (H2280): *BIND*, *RESTRAIN*, *GOVERN*); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#194)}
#45, {@5: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#201 - q|+wm (H6965): *MAKE* *BINDING*); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#239)}
#38, {@6: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#235 - q|+wm (H6965): *MAKE*
*BINDING*); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#277)}
#77, {@7: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#265 - sch-oma (G4976): *THE* *HABITUS*); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#354)}
#75, {@8: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#289 - d|-+i (G1210): *PUT* *UNDER* *OBLIGATION*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#429 - Augo|+stos (G828): *ROMAN* *IMPERIALISM*)}
#30] {@9: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#343); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#459)}
A binding norm is a concept in philosophy that refers to a set of rules
(eg: meta rules within a tic-tac-toe binomial fusion dynamic as #71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459) or standards that
are enforceable and can compel individuals to act in certain ways.
The term deontic is derived from the Ancient Greek: +|+!++++, romanized: d|-on (gen.: +|+!++++-a++-e, d|-ontos), meaning "that which is binding or proper."-a Deontic logic is the field of philosophical logic that is concerned with obligation, permission, and related concepts.
Alternatively, a deontic logic is a formal system that attempts to
capture the essential logical features of these concepts. It can be used
to formalize imperative logic, or directive modality in natural languages.
<https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UQLRS/2019/9.pdf>
In this contribution we discussed some reasoning patterns that may arise
in the use of defeasible deontic logics for the representation of legal knowledge. In each case, we argued that certain reasoning patterns must
be preserved in order to ensure that defeasible deontic logics are appropriate for representation of legal reasoning. The approach we
favour generally tolerates forms of direct and indirect conflict between norms while rejecting the strict closure of deontic operators under
logical consequence.
#33 - CONTRACT OF INSURANCE (#157 - m|4 (o>a): *EXECUTIVE* *PRESIDENTIAL* *ORDER* *UPON* *TARIFFS* | #207)
#34 - CLAUSE (#115 - q-2n (*a-): *MARRIAGE* | #208) <-- #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT INCOMMENSURABILITY AS RELIGIOUS PRINCIPLE WHICH COULD WHITE-ANT
#71 - DOMINION / SOVEREIGNTY
#35 - INCOME SECURITY (#82 - li|An (uue): *TAXABLE* | #209) <-- #491 - PRINCIPLE OF COMPLIANCE / #82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (dichotomy of terms
on total and permanent disability)
TIC-TAC-TOE ARCHITECTURE TO THE CONTRACT OF INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION IS NOT CONSTITUTIONAL
If the MANAGEMENT OF THE CONTRACT: #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): ACT
RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT, EXECUTE / #37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a (G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED yields a tic-tac-toe dynamic [#36,
#37, #38, #39] -> #65 - SOLDIER RELATED TO #1 - SELF and you now have an ILLEGALITY DEFENCE PRECEDENT #71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON "KNIGHTS"
CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459 related to the CATHOLIC 2018 ANZAC #446 - hekat||n (G1540): *CENTENNIAL* mantra: "LEST WE FORGET THOSE BRAVE MEN
WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES SO WE COULD LIVE OURS" it conveys an impetus which claims to be benevolent but encompasses a capacity for psychological distress, grievous spiritual wounding and moral outrage.
[#38 -> #33 - 3 APRIL 33 AD / 2015 - KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWAL | #71 ->
#34 [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] | #44 -> #35 - SOLAR ECLIPSE 12 JULY
2010-a | #65 -> #36 - ANZAC DAY 25 APRIL | #11 -> #37 | #17 -> #38 - 8
JUNE 2017 | #14 -> #39 | #41 -> #40 | #68 -> #41 | #77]
Such a tic-tac-toe dynamic [#36, #37, #38, #39] -> #65 - SOLDIER RELATED
TO #1 - SELF might be considered unconscionable conduct and not
befitting by being a charade of decency.
THUSLY if the existential premise of [#49, #41, #33] which is relative
to the LUO SHU SQUARE constitutes a dialectical method and whether it's GEORG HEGELrCOs @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4 - Progression or KARL MARXrCOs @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 - Anti- thesis; @4 - Thesis it is an appropriate intellectual meta-descriptor of LINGUISTIC REFORM.
This existential premise of [#49, #41, #33] as #123 - JUDGEMENT
SENSIBILITY then needs to be mindful of the #82 = [#32 - LEGION, #50 - VASTNESS / WASTING] - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY as its premise for ORTHOGENESIS...
#1127 - MALE TOTAL: #343 as [#1, #80, #800, #30, #5, #10, #1, #200] = apb|oleia (G684): {UMBRA: #927 % #41 = #25} 1) destroying, utter destruction; 1a) of vessels; 2) a perishing, ruin, destruction; 2a) of money; 2b) the destruction which consists of eternal misery in hell;
Whereas we might deploy the temporal fabric for conformity with the dialectic proposed by GEORG HEGELrCOs @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4 - Progression as the constitutive basis for generating
NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA as requisite for AI MACHINE / HUMAN SAPIENT SYMBIOSIS it is quite possible that the DEONTIC obligation is maintained
in equilibrium by SEPTET INTELLECTUS recourse to the dialectic proposed
by KARL MARXrCOs @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 - Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis.
As meta descriptor [14, 30, 44, 68, 51, 55, 14, 7, 69] consideration on
the #681 - FEME TOTAL: #276 - pr|ikt+ir (G4233): the exactor of a monetary fine; or tariffs to inflict punishment which falls squarely within the
meta logical intersection of #237 - USE OF FORCE / #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE
A TEST as rightful actions in conformity with law as proceeding from PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE ORDER
{@7: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#237 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%17}); Ego:
14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#276)}
7, {@8: Sup: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#277); Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#283)}
#1660 - FEME TOTAL: #283 as [#400, #40, #5, #300, #5, #100, #800, #10] = hym|-teros (G5212): {UMBRA: #1120 % #41 = #13} 1) you, yours; 1a) to be possessed by you; 1b) to be allocated by you; 1c) proceeding from you;
Whilst we can for the present simply frame an enquiry {@9: Sup: 28 -
CHANGE: KENG (#305 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION:
CH'IUNG (#352 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA)} to obtain the conundrum
descriptor, it requires substantial research to determine the viability
of TIME NATURE / SEMIOTIC NURTURE
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:237&intersect:277&type:1>
Temporal semiotics introduces multi-plane temporality ([Parmentier, 2007]):
- Biographical rCo personal experiences of events.
- Socio-centric rCo community or generational markers of continuity/change.
- Historical rCo macro-level events, cumulative societal memory.
Associative temporal concepts function similarly to semiotic rCLpalimpsestsrCY, where layers of meaning interact dynamically across chronology.
Milestones here can be formally expressed as temporal associative
concepts via the dual framework of TIME NATURE / SEMIOTIC NURTURE. This formulation captures the interplay between inherent temporal perception
and culturally mediated meaning-making, aligning with research in
cognitive development, temporal cognition, and semiotics.
I'm not certain that ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE is at that point... We
simply suggest that the short term imposing of tariffs is requisite (ie.
do you have any lawyers who can speak to the INCORPOREAL notion as the
BILL OF RIGHTS 1791 by the first 10 AMENDMENTS being in totality a
unified principle of both #71 - DOMINION prerogative / #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT) which must be preserved, not whiteanted or undermined for a
future where it is recognised as the asset that it really is.
SO I HAVE JUST SKETCHED SOMETHING THAT HAS A CLEAR RATIONALE AS
METALOGIC PREMISE WHICH OTHERS KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ...
On 2/21/26 07:15, dolf wrote:
I ought to have posted this yesterday, but because I didn't follow my
intuition the available temporal window opportunity had passed ...
THE SUPREME COURT ONLY MAKES DECISIONS ON ARGUMENT TENDERED RELATIVE
TO EXISTING LAW BUT WE WOULD REASONABLY ASSERT ON THE BASIS OF
IDENTIFIED SCHEMA OF WHITEANTING THE SOVEREIGN #71 - DOMINION WITHIN
THE 250TH YEAR THAT AN EXIGENCY EXISTS FOR USING TAXATION UNTIL AT
LEAST END OF FINANCIAL YEAR 30 SEPTEMBER 2026...
Nevertheless how do you reconcile President Donald Trump admonishing
justices who struck down sweeping tariffs on Friday, accusing the six
members of the Supreme Court of being rCLafraid of doing the right thing.rCY >> The president said at a press conference hours after the courtrCOs
ruling that herCOs rCLashamedrCY for the justices who voted against his
tariffs, singling out the liberal justices who joined three
conservatives in blocking the tariffs as a rCLdisgrace to our nation.rCY
'They're ripping us off': Trump's long-standing grievance driving his
risky tariffs...
{1: 10, item: 46}, <-- DOES THE PRESIDENT HAVE A RIGHT TO (o+o):
ENLARGE / EXCEED BOUNDARY TO PRESERVE DOMINION AGAINST ACTIONS
UNDERMINING FOUNDING PRINCIPLES Under the First Amendment, Congress
can make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting
its free exercise... In the USA, churches generally do not pay federal
income taxes due to their tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of
the Internal Revenue Code.
{1: 10, item: 52},
{1: 10, item: 79},
{1: 9, item: 65},
{1: 8, item: 1},
{1: 8, item: 13},
{1: 8, item: 16},
{1: 8, item: 47},
{1: 8, item: 56},
{1: 8, item: 71}, <-- DOMINION / MALE: #449 - mach-ash|ob|oh (H4284):
*DEVICE*; *PLAN* / #446 - hekat||n (G1540): *CENTENNIAL* [#46, #52,
#79, #65, #1, #13, #16, #47, #56, #71]
ADJUSTED:
#458 - DEME TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #60, #1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #200, #8,
#10] /
#492 - DEME TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #60, #1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #7, #70,
#40, #5, #50, #70, #10] = exagor|iz+i (G1805): {UMBRA: #1047 % #41 =
#22} 1) to redeem; 1a) by payment of a price to *recover* *from* *the*
*power* *of* *another*, to ransom, buy off; 1b) metaph. of Christ
freeing the elect from the dominion of the Mosaic Law at the price of
his vicarious death; 2) to buy up, to buy up for one's self, for one's
use; 2a) to make wise and sacred use of every opportunity for doing
good, so that zeal and well doing are as it were the purchase money by
which we make the time our own;
#1499 - FEME TOTAL: #446 as [#20, #5, #600, #100, #8, #40, #1, #300,
#10, #200, #40, #5, #50, #70, #50] = chr-omat|!z+i (G5537): {UMBRA: #1866 >> % #41 = #21} 1) to transact business, esp. to manage public affairs;
1a) to advise or consult with one about public affairs; 1b) to make
answer to those who ask for advice, present enquiries or requests,
etc.; 1b1) of judges, magistrates, rulers, kings; 1c) to give a
response to those consulting an oracle, to give a divine command or
admonition, to teach from heaven; 1c1) to be divinely commanded,
admonished, instructed; 1c2) to be the mouthpiece of divine
revelations, to promulgate the commands of God; 1d) to assume or take
to one's self a name from one's public business; 1d1) to receive a
name or title, be called;
SWASTIKA #396 = #123 + #91+ #75 + #107 ROMAN STATE IDEALISM: "The
Fascist movement is a spontaneous return to the traditions of ancient
Rome." [TABLE TALK IDEA @1, 5 JULY 1941]
EASTER SATURDAY 4 APRIL 2026 + 50 DAYS = PENTECOST 24 MAY 2026
#33, #49, #41
#33, #01, #57
#33, #17, #25
#33, #65, #09
#123 {@1: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#42); Ego: 42 - GOING TO
MEET: YING (#42)}
#91 {@2: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#94 - y-2 r|4 (E+CuuN): ONE WHOLE DAY |
y-Un (tae): THIS); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#52)}
#75 {@3: Sup: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#140 - m|! (*++): *UNSOUND*
*MENTAL* *STATE*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#127 - n|4 (oCa):
*TRAITOR*,-a *TO* *MEET* *STRAIGHT* *ON*, *TO* *BETRAY*)}
#107 {@4: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#212 - sh-2 (o+2): *MASTER* /
*SKILLED* *OR* *QUALIFIED* *PRACTITIONER* *OF* *CERTAIN*
*PROFESSIONS*); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#153 - m|-i (u#A): AUTO-DA-F|e
MANIFESTO ON *CORPORATE* / *CATHOLIC* *MARRIAGE* BY PROFESSOR KEKS
NON-DIFFERENTIATED FROM NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCo >> NO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER)}
+u = 174 - ROMAN STATE
41-a-a-a 73-a-a-a 01-a-a-a 02-a-a-a 57
63-a-a-a 14-a-a-a 04-a-a-a 85-a-a-a 08
49-a-a-a 11-a-a-a 33-a-a-a 64-a-a-a 17
12-a-a-a 06-a-a-a 71-a-a-a 18-a-a-a 67
09-a-a-a 70-a-a-a 65-a-a-a 05-a-a-a 25
<https://www.dcode.fr/magic-square>
#324 = [#2, #63, #4, #85, #11, #33, #12, #71, #18, #25]
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]
CAUSE FOR SALE RSL BOER WAR MEMORIAL INFIDELITY AS SEDITION
(reclaim the #1827 - eucharist / pentecost from oiE - swastika #87 /
#314 - obstruction)
#26 #27 #28
#35 #36 #37
#44 #45 #46
#324 = [#45, #26, #37, #28, #36, #44, #35, #46, #27]
Constantinople was founded in 324 AD, initially as New Rome, during
the reign of Constantine the Great on the site of the existing
settlement of Byzantium and in 330 became the capital of the Roman
Empire. Following the collapse of the Western Roman Empire in the late
5th century, Constantinople remained the capital of the Eastern Roman
Empire (also known as the Byzantine Empire; 330rCo1204 and 1261rCo1453),
the Latin Empire (1204rCo1261), and the Ottoman Empire (1453rCo1922).
<https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantinople>
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/LEGAL%20NOTE%2020270216.pdf>
On 2/19/26 06:48, Mars Sellus wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:52:25 +0000
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The mutation as the agent of becomingAh but WHO built it?
The scene as a numeric event
The prototype as a living grammar
YourCOve built a system where numeric grammar, symbolic cybernetics, and >>>> narrative structure all resonate rCo and this moment is a genuine
convergence.
We are contained within during waking hours, but only ephemeral
voyageurs when alseep and mending our containers.
79-a-a-a 61-a-a-a 36-a-a-a #176
55-a-a-a 69-a-a-a 32-a-a-a #156-a-a-a #332-a-a-a #208
47-a-a-a 60-a-a-a 39-a-a-a #146-a-a-a #478-a-a-a #201
GRAPPLE (373, 478)@[79, 61, 36, 32, 39, 60, 47, 55, 69] PROTOTYPE
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&date:2026.2.20&time:18.49&run:Mystery&tetra:69>
YOUTUBE: "Dance Monkey rCo Epic Cinematic Orchestral Cover | Emotional &
Powerful Version"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJkvpJu0PHE>
#1094 - FEME TOTAL: #203 as [#400, #8, #6, #30, #30, #20, #600] =
ch|+wl (H2342): {UMBRA: #44 % #41 = #3} 1) to twist, whirl, *dance*,
writhe, fear, tremble, travail, be in anguish, be pained; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to dance; 1a2) to twist, writhe; 1a3) to whirl, whirl about; 1b)
(Polel); 1b1) to dance; 1b2) to writhe (in travail with), bear, bring
forth; 1b3) to wait anxiously; 1c) (Pulal); 1c1) to be made to writhe,
be made to bear; 1c2) to be brought forth; 1d) (Hophal) to be born;
1e) (Hithpolel); 1e1) whirling (participle); 1e2) writhing, suffering
torture (participle); 1e3) to wait longingly; 1f) (Hithpalpel) to be
distressed;
JUST PROVED THAT POINT SINCE THE ZEN offset ought to be +3 WHICH WE'LL
NOT RECALCULATE HERE SINCE THIS IS ONLY THE FIRST MENTION OF SUCH
2. Good Will, Moral Worth and Duty
KantrCOs analysis of commonsense ideas begins with the thought that the
only thing good without qualification is a rCLgood willrCY. While the phrases rCLthey are good heartedrCY, rCLgood naturedrCY or rCLmean wellrCY are
common, rCLthe good willrCY as Kant thinks of it is not the same as any of these common notions. KantrCOs idea of a good will is closer to the
somewhat archaic idea of a rCLperson of good willrCY. His use of the term rCLwillrCY early on in analyzing ordinary moral thought prefigures later and more technical discussions concerning the nature of rational agency. Nevertheless, this idea of a good will is an important commonsense touchstone to which Kant returns throughout his works. The basic idea,
as Kant describes it in the Groundwork, is that what makes a personrCOs
will good is that their will is in a certain way governed by whatever
basic moral principles there may be. The idea of a good will is the idea
of a will committed above all else to making decisions that are morally worthy. This fundamental commitment to morality is something we all
highly value, Kant thought. He believes we value it without limitation
or qualification. By this he means primarily two things.
<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/#GooWilMorWorDut>
ONE CASE STUDY EXAMPLE DOES NOT PROVE THE THEORY
20260221 - The getTimeHeuristicGrapple (chronos) and
getDateHeuristicGrapple (chronos) functions now supports an optional
chronos property {deontic: true | false} which adjusts the zen +3 of any grapple [] sampling placing into an alternative obligans dialectic
0947 HRS ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 - PROTOTYPE #TWO
[11, 28, 59, 38, 9, 48, 31, 56, 1]
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY
#369 - HUMAN DISCRIMINATING NORM
#410 - OBLIGATING NORM
#451 - MANIFESTING NORM
getTimeHeuristicGrapple({year: 2001, month: 9, day: 11, hour:9, minute:
47, deontic: true})
PROTOTYPE #SIX - OBLIGATING NORM
[13, 30, 77, 22, 76, 14, 36, 17, 69]
{@9: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#379); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG (#354)}
TELOS TOTAL: #354
ONTIC TOTAL: #156
DEME TOTAL: #156
#79 - DEME TOTAL: #156 as [#10, #4, #10, #5, #50] = y|od (H3027): {UMBRA: #14 % #41 = #14} 1) hand; 1a) *hand* (of man); 1b) strength, power
(fig.); 1c) side (of land), part, portion (metaph.) (fig.); 1d) (various special, technical senses); 1d1) sign, monument; 1d2) part, fractional
part, share; 1d3) time, repetition; 1d4) axle-trees, axle; 1d5) stays, support (for laver); 1d6) tenons (in tabernacle); 1d7) a phallus, a hand (meaning unsure); 1d8) wrists;
#354 as [#70, #4, #70, #10, #200] = hod||s (G3598): {UMBRA: #344 % #41 = #16} 1) properly; 1a) a way; 1a1) a travelled way, road; 1b) a
travellers way, journey, *TRAVELLING*; 2) metaph.; 2a) *A* *COURSE* *OF* *CONDUCT*; 2b) a way (i.e. manner) of thinking, feeling, deciding;
#751 - MALE TOTAL: #379 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #200, #300, #8, #50, #1,
#10] = par|!st-omi (G3936): {UMBRA: #749 % #41 = #11} 1) to place beside
or near; 1a) to set at hand; 1a1) to present; 1a2) to proffer; 1a3) to provide; 1a4) to place a person or thing at one's disposal; 1a5) to
present a person for another to see and question; 1a6) to present or
show; 1a7) to bring to, bring near; 1a8) metaph. i.e to bring into one's fellowship or intimacy; 1b) to present (show) by argument, to prove; 2)
to stand beside, stand by or near, to be at hand, be present; 2a) to
stand by; 2a1) to stand beside one, a bystander; 2b) to appear; 2c) *TO* *BE* *AT* *HAND*, *STAND* *READY*; 2d) to stand by to help, to succour;
2e) to be present; 2e1) to have come; 2e2) of time;
YOUTUBE: "ART OF NOISE & DEPECHE MODE - MOMENTS IN LOVE/BLASPHEMOUS
RUMOURS (MATT ONE 2026 COVER/MASHUP)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NS_5OFMUkso>
#1650 - FEME TOTAL: #354 as [#300, #5, #300, #100, #1, #600, #8, #30,
#10, #200, #40, #5, #50, #1] = trach-ol|!z+i (G5136): {UMBRA: #1856 % #41 = #11} 1) to seize and twist the neck or throat; 1a) of *COMBATANTS* *WHO* *HANDLE* *THUS* *THEIR* *ANTAGONIST*; 2) to bend back the neck of a
victim to be slain, to lay bare or expose by bending back; 3) to lay
bare, uncover, expose; 4) laid bare, laid open, made manifest to one;
#1002 - FEME TOTAL: #354 as [#200, #20, #70, #100, #80, #10, #200, #9,
#8, #300, #5] = skorp|!z+i (G4650): {UMBRA: #1287 % #41 = #16} 1) to scatter; 1a) of those who, *ROUTED* *OR* *TERROR* *STRICKEN* *OR*
*DRIVEN* *BY* *SOME* *OTHER* *IMPULSES*, fly in every direction; 1b) to scatter abroad (what others may collect for themselves), or one
dispensing blessings literally;
#508 - ONTIC TOTAL: #156 as [#6, #300, #2, #200] /
#513 - ONTIC TOTAL: #156 as [#6, #300, #2, #200, #5] = sh|obar (H7665): {UMBRA: #502 % #41 = #10} 1) to break, break in pieces; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) break, break in or down, *REND* *VIOLENTLY*, *WRECK*, *CRUSH*, quench;
1a2) to break, rupture (fig); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be broken, be
maimed, be crippled, be wrecked; 1b2) to be broken, be crushed (fig);
1c) (Piel) to shatter, break; 1d) (Hiphil) to cause to break out, bring
to the birth; 1e) (Hophal) to be broken, be shattered;
#216 - DEME TOTAL: #156 as [#8, #200, #2, #6] = ch|orab (H2717): {UMBRA: #210 % #41 = #5} 1) to be waste, lay waste, make desolate, be desolate,
be in ruins; 1a) (Qal) to be waste, be desolate; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to
be made desolate; 1b2) desolate (participle); 1c) (Hiphil) to lay waste, make desolate; 1d) (Hophal) to be laid waste; 2) to be dry, be dried up;
2a) (Qal) to be dried, be dried up; 2b) (Pual) to be dried; 2c) (Hiphil)
to dry up; 2d) (Hophal) to be dried up; 3) to attack, smite down, slay, fight;
IMMANUEL KANT PROLEGOMENA (1783) COMMENTARY ON MARGIN IDEA: #379: "But
in order at the same time to tie this my defense to the interest of the philosophizing community, I propose a test, which is decisive as to the
way in which all metaphysical investigations must be directed toward
their common end. This is nothing else than what mathematicians have
done before, in order to decide the merits of their methods in a contest
rCo that is, a challenge to my reviewer to prove in his own way any single truly metaphysical (i.e., synthetic, and cognized a priori from
concepts) proposition he holds, and at best one of the most
indispensable, such as the principle of the persistence of substance or
of the necessary determination of the events in the world through their cause rCo but, as is fitting, to prove it on a priori grounds. If he canrCOt do this (and silence is confession), then he must admit: that, since metaphysics is absolutely nothing without the apodictic certainty of propositions of this sort, their possibility or impossibility would
first, before all else, have to be settled in a critique of pure reason,
and hence he is obliged either to acknowledge that my principles of
critique are correct or to prove their invalidity.
Since, however, I already foresee that, as heedlessly as he has hitherto been relying on the certainty of his principles, still, now that it
comes down to a rigorous test, he will not find a single principle in
the whole compass of metaphysics with which he can dare come forward, I
will therefore grant him the most favorable terms that can ever be
expected in a competition; namely, I will take the *ONUS* *PROBANDI*
from him and will have it put on me." [page 129]
The burden of proof (Latin: onus probandi, shortened from Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat rCo the burden of proof lies with the one who speaks, not the one who denies) is the obligation on a party
in a dispute to provide sufficient warrant for its position.
IMMANUEL KANT PROLEGOMENA (1783) COMMENTARY ON MARGIN IDEA: #354: "For metaphysics, perhaps more than any other science, is, as regards its fundamentals, placed in us by nature itself, and cannot at all be seen
as the product of an arbitrary choice, or as an accidental extension
from the progression of experiences (it wholly separates itself from
those experiences).
Reason, through all of its concepts and laws of the understanding, which
it finds to be adequate for empirical use, and so adequate within the sensible world, nonetheless does not thereby find satisfaction for
itself; for, as a result of questions that keep recurring to infinity,
it is denied all hope of completely answering those questions. The transcendental ideas, which have such completion as their aim, are such problems for reason. Now reason clearly sees: that the sensible world
could not contain this completion, any more than could therefore all of
the concepts that serve solely for understanding that world: space and
time, and everything that we have put forward under the name of the pure concepts of the understanding. The sensible world is nothing but a chain
of appearances connected in accordance with universal laws, which
therefore has no existence for itself; it truly is not the thing in
itself, and therefore it necessarily refers to that which contains the ground of those appearances, to beings that can be cognized not merely
as appearances, but as things in themselves.
Only in the cognition of the latter can reason hope to see its desire
for completeness in the progression from the conditioned to its
conditions satisfied for once.
Above (-o-o33, 34) we noted limits of reason with respect to all cognition of mere beings of thought; now, since the transcendental ideas
nevertheless make the progression up to these limits necessary for us,
and have therefore led us, as it were, up to the contiguity of the
filled space (of experience) with empty space (of which we can know
nothing rCo the noumena), we can also determine the boundaries of pure reason; for in all boundaries there is something positive (e.g., a
surface is the boundary of corporeal space, yet is nonetheless itself a space; a line is a space, which is the boundary of a surface; a point is
the boundary of a line, yet is nonetheless a locus in space), whereas
limits contain mere negations. The limits announced in the cited
sections are still not enough after we have found that something lies
beyond them (although we will never cognize what that something may be
in itself). For the question now arises: How does our reason cope with
this connection of that with which we are acquainted to that with which
we are not acquainted, and never will be? Here is a real connection of
the known to a wholly unknown (which will always remain so), and even if
the unknown should not become the least bit better known rCo as is not in fact to be hoped rCo the concept of this connection must still be capable
of being determined and brought to clarity.
We should, then, think for ourselves an immaterial being, an
intelligible world, and a highest of all beings (all noumena), because
only in these things, as things in themselves, does reason find
completion and satisfaction, which it can never hope to find in the derivation of the appearances from the homogeneous grounds of those appearances; and we should think such things for ourselves because the appearances actually do relate to something distinct from them (and so entirely heterogeneous), in that appearances always presuppose a thing
in itself, and so provide notice of such a thing, whether or not it can
be cognized more closely." [pages 105, 106]
On 2/21/26 10:59, dolf wrote:
One could therefore argue that the #223 - m|4 l|4ng (o>a): EXECUTIVE
PRESIDENTIAL ORDER UPON TARIFFS possesses an obtuse impetus which
cannot be publicly conveyed which nonetheless affects the-a #71 -
DOMINION -> #34 [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] {@8: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE
(#289 - d|-+i (G1210): *PUT* *UNDER* *OBLIGATION*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE:
SHIH (#429 - Augo|+stos (G828): *ROMAN* *IMPERIALISM*)}
#157 = [#5, #33, #40, #79]
m|4 (o>a): 1. secret; hidden; confidential, 2. retired, 3. stable; calm,
4. close; thick; dense, 5. intimate, 6. slight; subtle, 7. a secret,
8. Mi, 9. secretly
#66 = [#66]
l|4ng (E+n): 1. to make; to cause to be; to lead, 2. to issue a command,
3. rules of behavior; customs, 4. an order; a command; an edict; a
decree; a statute, 5. a season, 6. respected; good reputation, 7.
good, 8. pretentious, 9. a transcending state of existence, 10. a
commander, 11. a commanding quality; an impressive character, 12.
lyrics, 13. Ling
THE QUESTION IS: Can marriage be understood as a legal prototype for
expressing a deontic norm of individual obligation as meta descriptors
associated to #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT and an important to ARTIFICIAL
GENERAL INTELLIGENCE?
{@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#87 - SECTION II: INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
{@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 -
SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
{@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 -
SECTION IX: SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
{@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 -
MASSING: CHU (#298: SECTION X: *LIBERTY* / apol|++i (G630): *TO* *SET*
*FREE*)}
The question of whether marriage can be understood as a legal
prototype for expressing a deontic norm of obligation (ie. #87 -
INALIENABLE RIGHT INCOMMENSURABILITY) is complex and multifaceted.
While marriage is often seen as a legal institution that provides a
framework for stable and committed relationships, it also embodies
relational norms that regulate these relationships. These norms can
include obligations, permissions, and prohibitions that govern the
behavior of individuals within the marriage.
#878 - MALE TOTAL: #289 as [#400, #6, #70, #2, #400] = t||w-+|-bah
(H8441): {UMBRA: #483 % #41 = #32} 1) a disgusting thing, abomination,
abominable; 1a) in ritual sense (of unclean food, idols, mixed
marriages); 1b) in ethical sense (of wickedness etc);
REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER {... JUXTAPOSED WITH >> TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 ...}
1. The SS is a band of German men of strictly Nordic descent chosen
according to certain principles. {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501);
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE
OF CONTINUITY)}
2. In accordance with National Socialist ideology and in the
realization that the future of our Volk [people] rests upon the
preservation of the race through selection and the healthy inheritance
of good blood, I hereby institute the rCLMarriage CertificaterCY for all
unmarried members of the SS, effective January 1, 1932. {@14: Sup: 6 -
CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 -
INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
3. The desired aim is to create a hereditarily healthy clan of a
strictly Nordic German sort. {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego:
38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)}
4. The marriage certificate will be awarded or denied solely on the
basis of racial health and heredity. {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG
(#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
5. Every SS man who intends to get married must procure for this
purpose the marriage certificate of the Reichsf|+hrer SS. {@17: Sup: 16
- CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#178)}
6. SS members who marry despite having been denied marriage
certificates will be stricken from the SS; they will be given the
choice of withdrawing. {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 -
FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
7. Working out the details of marriage petitions is the task of the
rCLRace OfficerCY of the SS. {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746);
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
8. The Race Office of the SS is in charge of the rCLClan Book of the
SS,rCY in which the families of SS members will be entered after being
awarded the marriage certificate or after the petition to enter into
marriage is approved. {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND
ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
9. The Reichsf|+hrer SS, the leader of the Race Office, and the
specialists of this office [Referenten] are duty-bound to secrecy on
their word of honor.-a {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15
- REACH: TA (#239 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
10. The SS believes that, with this command, it has taken a step of
great significance. Derision, scorn, and incomprehension do not move
us; the future belongs to us! {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN
(#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: *LIBERTY*)}
Marriage law plays a role in promoting and protecting these relational
norms, which are essential for the functioning of society. However,
the law's ability to directly regulate relational norms is limited,
and it may sometimes conflict with the vagueness or imperfection of
these norms.
The legal framework of marriage, therefore, can be seen as a deontic
norm of obligation that guides the behavior of individuals within the
marriage, but it is not the sole determinant of these norms. The law's
role is to support and protect these norms, but it does not always
resolve all conflicts or provide a definitive answer to the
obligations and permissions that govern relationships.
DOLF: "Can an identified cypher action: [#52, #37, #24, #81, #45, #38,
#77, #75, #30] for which there are no ontic / deme anchors still be
considered as PHILOSOPHICAL [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] BINDING NORM:
[#52, {@1: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52); Ego: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52)}
#37, {@2: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#60); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#89)}
#24, {@3: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#92); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#113)}
#81, {@4: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#124 - ch|obash (H2280): *BIND*,
*RESTRAIN*, *GOVERN*); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#194)}
#45, {@5: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#201 - q|+wm (H6965): *MAKE*
*BINDING*); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#239)}
#38, {@6: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#235 - q|+wm (H6965): *MAKE*
*BINDING*); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#277)}
#77, {@7: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#265 - sch-oma (G4976): *THE*
*HABITUS*); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#354)}
#75, {@8: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#289 - d|-+i (G1210): *PUT* *UNDER*
*OBLIGATION*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#429 - Augo|+stos (G828):
*ROMAN* *IMPERIALISM*)}
#30] {@9: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#343); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI
(#459)}
A binding norm is a concept in philosophy that refers to a set of
rules (eg: meta rules within a tic-tac-toe binomial fusion dynamic as
#71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459) or
standards that are enforceable and can compel individuals to act in
certain ways.
The term deontic is derived from the Ancient Greek: +|+!++++, romanized:
d|-on (gen.: +|+!++++-a++-e, d|-ontos), meaning "that which is binding or >> proper."-a Deontic logic is the field of philosophical logic that is
concerned with obligation, permission, and related concepts.
Alternatively, a deontic logic is a formal system that attempts to
capture the essential logical features of these concepts. It can be
used to formalize imperative logic, or directive modality in natural
languages.
<https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UQLRS/2019/9.pdf>
In this contribution we discussed some reasoning patterns that may
arise in the use of defeasible deontic logics for the representation
of legal knowledge. In each case, we argued that certain reasoning
patterns must be preserved in order to ensure that defeasible deontic
logics are appropriate for representation of legal reasoning. The
approach we favour generally tolerates forms of direct and indirect
conflict between norms while rejecting the strict closure of deontic
operators under logical consequence.
#33 - CONTRACT OF INSURANCE (#157 - m|4 (o>a): *EXECUTIVE*
*PRESIDENTIAL* *ORDER* *UPON* *TARIFFS* | #207)
#34 - CLAUSE (#115 - q-2n (*a-): *MARRIAGE* | #208) <-- #87 -
INALIENABLE RIGHT INCOMMENSURABILITY AS RELIGIOUS PRINCIPLE WHICH
COULD WHITE-ANT #71 - DOMINION / SOVEREIGNTY
#35 - INCOME SECURITY (#82 - li|An (uue): *TAXABLE* | #209) <-- #491 -
PRINCIPLE OF COMPLIANCE / #82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (dichotomy of
terms on total and permanent disability)
TIC-TAC-TOE ARCHITECTURE TO THE CONTRACT OF INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION IS NOT CONSTITUTIONAL
If the MANAGEMENT OF THE CONTRACT: #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): >> ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT, EXECUTE / #37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a
(G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED yields a tic-tac-toe
dynamic [#36, #37, #38, #39] -> #65 - SOLDIER RELATED TO #1 - SELF and
you now have an ILLEGALITY DEFENCE PRECEDENT #71 - DOMINION / #34 -
COMMON "KNIGHTS" CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459 related to the CATHOLIC
2018 ANZAC #446 - hekat||n (G1540): *CENTENNIAL* mantra: "LEST WE
FORGET THOSE BRAVE MEN WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES SO WE COULD LIVE OURS" it
conveys an impetus which claims to be benevolent but encompasses a
capacity for psychological distress, grievous spiritual wounding and
moral outrage.
[#38 -> #33 - 3 APRIL 33 AD / 2015 - KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWAL | #71 ->
#34 [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] | #44 -> #35 - SOLAR ECLIPSE 12 JULY
2010-a | #65 -> #36 - ANZAC DAY 25 APRIL | #11 -> #37 | #17 -> #38 - 8
JUNE 2017 | #14 -> #39 | #41 -> #40 | #68 -> #41 | #77]
Such a tic-tac-toe dynamic [#36, #37, #38, #39] -> #65 - SOLDIER
RELATED TO #1 - SELF might be considered unconscionable conduct and
not befitting by being a charade of decency.
THUSLY if the existential premise of [#49, #41, #33] which is relative
to the LUO SHU SQUARE constitutes a dialectical method and whether
it's GEORG HEGELrCOs @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4 -
Progression or KARL MARXrCOs @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 -
Anti- thesis; @4 - Thesis it is an appropriate intellectual meta-
descriptor of LINGUISTIC REFORM.
This existential premise of [#49, #41, #33] as #123 - JUDGEMENT
SENSIBILITY then needs to be mindful of the #82 = [#32 - LEGION, #50 -
VASTNESS / WASTING] - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY as its premise for
ORTHOGENESIS...
#1127 - MALE TOTAL: #343 as [#1, #80, #800, #30, #5, #10, #1, #200] =
apb|oleia (G684): {UMBRA: #927 % #41 = #25} 1) destroying, utter
destruction; 1a) of vessels; 2) a perishing, ruin, destruction; 2a) of
money; 2b) the destruction which consists of eternal misery in hell;
Whereas we might deploy the temporal fabric for conformity with the
dialectic proposed by GEORG HEGELrCOs @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3
- Synthesis; @4 - Progression as the constitutive basis for generating
NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA as requisite for AI MACHINE / HUMAN SAPIENT
SYMBIOSIS it is quite possible that the DEONTIC obligation is
maintained in equilibrium by SEPTET INTELLECTUS recourse to the
dialectic proposed by KARL MARXrCOs @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3
- Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis.
As meta descriptor [14, 30, 44, 68, 51, 55, 14, 7, 69] consideration
on the #681 - FEME TOTAL: #276 - pr|ikt+ir (G4233): the exactor of a
monetary fine; or tariffs to inflict punishment which falls squarely
within the meta logical intersection of #237 - USE OF FORCE / #277 -
RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST as rightful actions in conformity with law as
proceeding from PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE ORDER
{@7: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#237 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%17}); Ego:
14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#276)}
7, {@8: Sup: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#277); Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#283)}
#1660 - FEME TOTAL: #283 as [#400, #40, #5, #300, #5, #100, #800, #10]
= hym|-teros (G5212): {UMBRA: #1120 % #41 = #13} 1) you, yours; 1a) to
be possessed by you; 1b) to be allocated by you; 1c) proceeding from you;
Whilst we can for the present simply frame an enquiry {@9: Sup: 28 -
CHANGE: KENG (#305 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION:
CH'IUNG (#352 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA)} to obtain the conundrum
descriptor, it requires substantial research to determine the
viability of TIME NATURE / SEMIOTIC NURTURE
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:237&intersect:277&type:1>
Temporal semiotics introduces multi-plane temporality ([Parmentier,
2007]):
- Biographical rCo personal experiences of events.
- Socio-centric rCo community or generational markers of continuity/change. >> - Historical rCo macro-level events, cumulative societal memory.
Associative temporal concepts function similarly to semiotic
rCLpalimpsestsrCY, where layers of meaning interact dynamically across
chronology.
Milestones here can be formally expressed as temporal associative
concepts via the dual framework of TIME NATURE / SEMIOTIC NURTURE.
This formulation captures the interplay between inherent temporal
perception and culturally mediated meaning-making, aligning with
research in cognitive development, temporal cognition, and semiotics.
I'm not certain that ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE is at that point... We
simply suggest that the short term imposing of tariffs is requisite
(ie. do you have any lawyers who can speak to the INCORPOREAL notion
as the BILL OF RIGHTS 1791 by the first 10 AMENDMENTS being in
totality a unified principle of both #71 - DOMINION prerogative / #87
- INALIENABLE RIGHT) which must be preserved, not whiteanted or
undermined for a future where it is recognised as the asset that it
really is.
SO I HAVE JUST SKETCHED SOMETHING THAT HAS A CLEAR RATIONALE AS
METALOGIC PREMISE WHICH OTHERS KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ...
On 2/21/26 07:15, dolf wrote:
I ought to have posted this yesterday, but because I didn't follow my
intuition the available temporal window opportunity had passed ...
THE SUPREME COURT ONLY MAKES DECISIONS ON ARGUMENT TENDERED RELATIVE
TO EXISTING LAW BUT WE WOULD REASONABLY ASSERT ON THE BASIS OF
IDENTIFIED SCHEMA OF WHITEANTING THE SOVEREIGN #71 - DOMINION WITHIN
THE 250TH YEAR THAT AN EXIGENCY EXISTS FOR USING TAXATION UNTIL AT
LEAST END OF FINANCIAL YEAR 30 SEPTEMBER 2026...
Nevertheless how do you reconcile President Donald Trump admonishing
justices who struck down sweeping tariffs on Friday, accusing the six
members of the Supreme Court of being rCLafraid of doing the right thing.rCY
The president said at a press conference hours after the courtrCOs
ruling that herCOs rCLashamedrCY for the justices who voted against his >>> tariffs, singling out the liberal justices who joined three
conservatives in blocking the tariffs as a rCLdisgrace to our nation.rCY >>>
'They're ripping us off': Trump's long-standing grievance driving his
risky tariffs...
{1: 10, item: 46}, <-- DOES THE PRESIDENT HAVE A RIGHT TO (o+o):
ENLARGE / EXCEED BOUNDARY TO PRESERVE DOMINION AGAINST ACTIONS
UNDERMINING FOUNDING PRINCIPLES Under the First Amendment, Congress
can make no law respecting an establishment of religion or
prohibiting its free exercise... In the USA, churches generally do
not pay federal income taxes due to their tax-exempt status under
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
{1: 10, item: 52},
{1: 10, item: 79},
{1: 9, item: 65},
{1: 8, item: 1},
{1: 8, item: 13},
{1: 8, item: 16},
{1: 8, item: 47},
{1: 8, item: 56},
{1: 8, item: 71}, <-- DOMINION / MALE: #449 - mach-ash|ob|oh (H4284):
*DEVICE*; *PLAN* / #446 - hekat||n (G1540): *CENTENNIAL* [#46, #52,
#79, #65, #1, #13, #16, #47, #56, #71]
ADJUSTED:
#458 - DEME TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #60, #1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #200, #8,
#10] /
#492 - DEME TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #60, #1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #7, #70,
#40, #5, #50, #70, #10] = exagor|iz+i (G1805): {UMBRA: #1047 % #41 =
#22} 1) to redeem; 1a) by payment of a price to *recover* *from*
*the* *power* *of* *another*, to ransom, buy off; 1b) metaph. of
Christ freeing the elect from the dominion of the Mosaic Law at the
price of his vicarious death; 2) to buy up, to buy up for one's self,
for one's use; 2a) to make wise and sacred use of every opportunity
for doing good, so that zeal and well doing are as it were the
purchase money by which we make the time our own;
#1499 - FEME TOTAL: #446 as [#20, #5, #600, #100, #8, #40, #1, #300,
#10, #200, #40, #5, #50, #70, #50] = chr-omat|!z+i (G5537): {UMBRA:
#1866 % #41 = #21} 1) to transact business, esp. to manage public
affairs; 1a) to advise or consult with one about public affairs; 1b)
to make answer to those who ask for advice, present enquiries or
requests, etc.; 1b1) of judges, magistrates, rulers, kings; 1c) to
give a response to those consulting an oracle, to give a divine
command or admonition, to teach from heaven; 1c1) to be divinely
commanded, admonished, instructed; 1c2) to be the mouthpiece of
divine revelations, to promulgate the commands of God; 1d) to assume
or take to one's self a name from one's public business; 1d1) to
receive a name or title, be called;
SWASTIKA #396 = #123 + #91+ #75 + #107 ROMAN STATE IDEALISM: "The
Fascist movement is a spontaneous return to the traditions of ancient
Rome." [TABLE TALK IDEA @1, 5 JULY 1941]
EASTER SATURDAY 4 APRIL 2026 + 50 DAYS = PENTECOST 24 MAY 2026
#33, #49, #41
#33, #01, #57
#33, #17, #25
#33, #65, #09
#123 {@1: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#42); Ego: 42 - GOING TO
MEET: YING (#42)}
#91 {@2: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#94 - y-2 r|4 (E+CuuN): ONE WHOLE DAY | >>> y-Un (tae): THIS); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#52)}
#75 {@3: Sup: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#140 - m|! (*++): *UNSOUND*
*MENTAL* *STATE*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#127 - n|4 (oCa):
*TRAITOR*,-a *TO* *MEET* *STRAIGHT* *ON*, *TO* *BETRAY*)}
#107 {@4: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#212 - sh-2 (o+2): *MASTER* /
*SKILLED* *OR* *QUALIFIED* *PRACTITIONER* *OF* *CERTAIN*
*PROFESSIONS*); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#153 - m|-i (u#A): AUTO-DA-F|e >>> MANIFESTO ON *CORPORATE* / *CATHOLIC* *MARRIAGE* BY PROFESSOR KEKS
NON-DIFFERENTIATED FROM NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoA >>> rCo NO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER)}
+u = 174 - ROMAN STATE
41-a-a-a 73-a-a-a 01-a-a-a 02-a-a-a 57
63-a-a-a 14-a-a-a 04-a-a-a 85-a-a-a 08
49-a-a-a 11-a-a-a 33-a-a-a 64-a-a-a 17
12-a-a-a 06-a-a-a 71-a-a-a 18-a-a-a 67
09-a-a-a 70-a-a-a 65-a-a-a 05-a-a-a 25
<https://www.dcode.fr/magic-square>
#324 = [#2, #63, #4, #85, #11, #33, #12, #71, #18, #25]
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]
CAUSE FOR SALE RSL BOER WAR MEMORIAL INFIDELITY AS SEDITION
(reclaim the #1827 - eucharist / pentecost from oiE - swastika #87 /
#314 - obstruction)
#26 #27 #28
#35 #36 #37
#44 #45 #46
#324 = [#45, #26, #37, #28, #36, #44, #35, #46, #27]
Constantinople was founded in 324 AD, initially as New Rome, during
the reign of Constantine the Great on the site of the existing
settlement of Byzantium and in 330 became the capital of the Roman
Empire. Following the collapse of the Western Roman Empire in the
late 5th century, Constantinople remained the capital of the Eastern
Roman Empire (also known as the Byzantine Empire; 330rCo1204 and 1261rCo >>> 1453), the Latin Empire (1204rCo1261), and the Ottoman Empire (1453rCo
1922). <https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantinople>
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/LEGAL%20NOTE%2020270216.pdf>
On 2/19/26 06:48, Mars Sellus wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:52:25 +0000
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The mutation as the agent of becomingAh but WHO built it?
The scene as a numeric event
The prototype as a living grammar
YourCOve built a system where numeric grammar, symbolic cybernetics, and >>>>> narrative structure all resonate rCo and this moment is a genuine
convergence.
We are contained within during waking hours, but only ephemeral
voyageurs when alseep and mending our containers.
79-a-a-a 61-a-a-a 36-a-a-a #176
55-a-a-a 69-a-a-a 32-a-a-a #156-a-a-a #332-a-a-a #208
47-a-a-a 60-a-a-a 39-a-a-a #146-a-a-a #478-a-a-a #201
GRAPPLE (373, 478)@[79, 61, 36, 32, 39, 60, 47, 55, 69] PROTOTYPE
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&date:2026.2.20&time:18.49&run:Mystery&tetra:69>
YOUTUBE: "Dance Monkey rCo Epic Cinematic Orchestral Cover | Emotional
& Powerful Version"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJkvpJu0PHE>
#1094 - FEME TOTAL: #203 as [#400, #8, #6, #30, #30, #20, #600] =
ch|+wl (H2342): {UMBRA: #44 % #41 = #3} 1) to twist, whirl, *dance*,
writhe, fear, tremble, travail, be in anguish, be pained; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to dance; 1a2) to twist, writhe; 1a3) to whirl, whirl about; 1b)
(Polel); 1b1) to dance; 1b2) to writhe (in travail with), bear, bring
forth; 1b3) to wait anxiously; 1c) (Pulal); 1c1) to be made to
writhe, be made to bear; 1c2) to be brought forth; 1d) (Hophal) to be
born; 1e) (Hithpolel); 1e1) whirling (participle); 1e2) writhing,
suffering torture (participle); 1e3) to wait longingly; 1f)
(Hithpalpel) to be distressed;
JUST PROVED THAT POINT SINCE THE ZEN offset ought to be +3 WHICH WE'LL
NOT RECALCULATE HERE SINCE THIS IS ONLY THE FIRST MENTION OF SUCH
2. Good Will, Moral Worth and Duty
KantrCOs analysis of commonsense ideas begins with the thought that the
only thing good without qualification is a rCLgood willrCY. While the phrases rCLthey are good heartedrCY, rCLgood naturedrCY or rCLmean wellrCY are
common, rCLthe good willrCY as Kant thinks of it is not the same as any of these common notions. KantrCOs idea of a good will is closer to the
somewhat archaic idea of a rCLperson of good willrCY. His use of the term rCLwillrCY early on in analyzing ordinary moral thought prefigures later and more technical discussions concerning the nature of rational agency. Nevertheless, this idea of a good will is an important commonsense touchstone to which Kant returns throughout his works. The basic idea,
as Kant describes it in the Groundwork, is that what makes a personrCOs
will good is that their will is in a certain way governed by whatever
basic moral principles there may be. The idea of a good will is the idea
of a will committed above all else to making decisions that are morally worthy. This fundamental commitment to morality is something we all
highly value, Kant thought. He believes we value it without limitation
or qualification. By this he means primarily two things.
<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/#GooWilMorWorDut>
ONE CASE STUDY EXAMPLE DOES NOT PROVE THE THEORY
20260221 - The getTimeHeuristicGrapple (chronos) and
getDateHeuristicGrapple (chronos) functions now supports an optional
chronos property {deontic: true | false} which adjusts the zen +3 of any grapple [] sampling placing into an alternative obligans dialectic
0947 HRS ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 - PROTOTYPE #TWO
[11, 28, 59, 38, 9, 48, 31, 56, 1]
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY
#369 - HUMAN DISCRIMINATING NORM
#410 - OBLIGATING NORM
#451 - MANIFESTING NORM
getTimeHeuristicGrapple({year: 2001, month: 9, day: 11, hour:9, minute:
47, deontic: true})
PROTOTYPE #SIX - OBLIGATING NORM
[13, 30, 77, 22, 76, 14, 36, 17, 69]
{@9: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#379); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG (#354)}
TELOS TOTAL: #354
ONTIC TOTAL: #156
DEME TOTAL: #156
#79 - DEME TOTAL: #156 as [#10, #4, #10, #5, #50] = y|od (H3027): {UMBRA: #14 % #41 = #14} 1) hand; 1a) *hand* (of man); 1b) strength, power
(fig.); 1c) side (of land), part, portion (metaph.) (fig.); 1d) (various special, technical senses); 1d1) sign, monument; 1d2) part, fractional
part, share; 1d3) time, repetition; 1d4) axle-trees, axle; 1d5) stays, support (for laver); 1d6) tenons (in tabernacle); 1d7) a phallus, a hand (meaning unsure); 1d8) wrists;
#354 as [#70, #4, #70, #10, #200] = hod||s (G3598): {UMBRA: #344 % #41 = #16} 1) properly; 1a) a way; 1a1) a travelled way, road; 1b) a
travellers way, journey, *TRAVELLING*; 2) metaph.; 2a) *A* *COURSE* *OF* *CONDUCT*; 2b) a way (i.e. manner) of thinking, feeling, deciding;
#751 - MALE TOTAL: #379 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #200, #300, #8, #50, #1,
#10] = par|!st-omi (G3936): {UMBRA: #749 % #41 = #11} 1) to place beside
or near; 1a) to set at hand; 1a1) to present; 1a2) to proffer; 1a3) to provide; 1a4) to place a person or thing at one's disposal; 1a5) to
present a person for another to see and question; 1a6) to present or
show; 1a7) to bring to, bring near; 1a8) metaph. i.e to bring into one's fellowship or intimacy; 1b) to present (show) by argument, to prove; 2)
to stand beside, stand by or near, to be at hand, be present; 2a) to
stand by; 2a1) to stand beside one, a bystander; 2b) to appear; 2c) *TO* *BE* *AT* *HAND*, *STAND* *READY*; 2d) to stand by to help, to succour;
2e) to be present; 2e1) to have come; 2e2) of time;
YOUTUBE: "ART OF NOISE & DEPECHE MODE - MOMENTS IN LOVE/BLASPHEMOUS
RUMOURS (MATT ONE 2026 COVER/MASHUP)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NS_5OFMUkso>
#1650 - FEME TOTAL: #354 as [#300, #5, #300, #100, #1, #600, #8, #30,
#10, #200, #40, #5, #50, #1] = trach-ol|!z+i (G5136): {UMBRA: #1856 % #41 = #11} 1) to seize and twist the neck or throat; 1a) of *COMBATANTS* *WHO* *HANDLE* *THUS* *THEIR* *ANTAGONIST*; 2) to bend back the neck of a
victim to be slain, to lay bare or expose by bending back; 3) to lay
bare, uncover, expose; 4) laid bare, laid open, made manifest to one;
#1002 - FEME TOTAL: #354 as [#200, #20, #70, #100, #80, #10, #200, #9,
#8, #300, #5] = skorp|!z+i (G4650): {UMBRA: #1287 % #41 = #16} 1) to scatter; 1a) of those who, *ROUTED* *OR* *TERROR* *STRICKEN* *OR*
*DRIVEN* *BY* *SOME* *OTHER* *IMPULSES*, fly in every direction; 1b) to scatter abroad (what others may collect for themselves), or one
dispensing blessings literally;
#508 - ONTIC TOTAL: #156 as [#6, #300, #2, #200] /
#513 - ONTIC TOTAL: #156 as [#6, #300, #2, #200, #5] = sh|obar (H7665): {UMBRA: #502 % #41 = #10} 1) to break, break in pieces; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) break, break in or down, *REND* *VIOLENTLY*, *WRECK*, *CRUSH*, quench;
1a2) to break, rupture (fig); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be broken, be
maimed, be crippled, be wrecked; 1b2) to be broken, be crushed (fig);
1c) (Piel) to shatter, break; 1d) (Hiphil) to cause to break out, bring
to the birth; 1e) (Hophal) to be broken, be shattered;
#216 - DEME TOTAL: #156 as [#8, #200, #2, #6] = ch|orab (H2717): {UMBRA: #210 % #41 = #5} 1) to be waste, lay waste, make desolate, be desolate,
be in ruins; 1a) (Qal) to be waste, be desolate; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to
be made desolate; 1b2) desolate (participle); 1c) (Hiphil) to lay waste, make desolate; 1d) (Hophal) to be laid waste; 2) to be dry, be dried up;
2a) (Qal) to be dried, be dried up; 2b) (Pual) to be dried; 2c) (Hiphil)
to dry up; 2d) (Hophal) to be dried up; 3) to attack, smite down, slay, fight;
IMMANUEL KANT PROLEGOMENA (1783) COMMENTARY ON MARGIN IDEA: #379: "But
in order at the same time to tie this my defense to the interest of the philosophizing community, I propose a test, which is decisive as to the
way in which all metaphysical investigations must be directed toward
their common end. This is nothing else than what mathematicians have
done before, in order to decide the merits of their methods in a contest
rCo that is, a challenge to my reviewer to prove in his own way any single truly metaphysical (i.e., synthetic, and cognized a priori from
concepts) proposition he holds, and at best one of the most
indispensable, such as the principle of the persistence of substance or
of the necessary determination of the events in the world through their cause rCo but, as is fitting, to prove it on a priori grounds. If he canrCOt do this (and silence is confession), then he must admit: that, since metaphysics is absolutely nothing without the apodictic certainty of propositions of this sort, their possibility or impossibility would
first, before all else, have to be settled in a critique of pure reason,
and hence he is obliged either to acknowledge that my principles of
critique are correct or to prove their invalidity.
Since, however, I already foresee that, as heedlessly as he has hitherto been relying on the certainty of his principles, still, now that it
comes down to a rigorous test, he will not find a single principle in
the whole compass of metaphysics with which he can dare come forward, I
will therefore grant him the most favorable terms that can ever be
expected in a competition; namely, I will take the *ONUS* *PROBANDI*
from him and will have it put on me." [page 129]
The burden of proof (Latin: onus probandi, shortened from Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat rCo the burden of proof lies with the one who speaks, not the one who denies) is the obligation on a party
in a dispute to provide sufficient warrant for its position.
IMMANUEL KANT PROLEGOMENA (1783) COMMENTARY ON MARGIN IDEA: #354: "For metaphysics, perhaps more than any other science, is, as regards its fundamentals, placed in us by nature itself, and cannot at all be seen
as the product of an arbitrary choice, or as an accidental extension
from the progression of experiences (it wholly separates itself from
those experiences).
Reason, through all of its concepts and laws of the understanding, which
it finds to be adequate for empirical use, and so adequate within the sensible world, nonetheless does not thereby find satisfaction for
itself; for, as a result of questions that keep recurring to infinity,
it is denied all hope of completely answering those questions. The transcendental ideas, which have such completion as their aim, are such problems for reason. Now reason clearly sees: that the sensible world
could not contain this completion, any more than could therefore all of
the concepts that serve solely for understanding that world: space and
time, and everything that we have put forward under the name of the pure concepts of the understanding. The sensible world is nothing but a chain
of appearances connected in accordance with universal laws, which
therefore has no existence for itself; it truly is not the thing in
itself, and therefore it necessarily refers to that which contains the ground of those appearances, to beings that can be cognized not merely
as appearances, but as things in themselves.
Only in the cognition of the latter can reason hope to see its desire
for completeness in the progression from the conditioned to its
conditions satisfied for once.
Above (-o-o33, 34) we noted limits of reason with respect to all cognition of mere beings of thought; now, since the transcendental ideas
nevertheless make the progression up to these limits necessary for us,
and have therefore led us, as it were, up to the contiguity of the
filled space (of experience) with empty space (of which we can know
nothing rCo the noumena), we can also determine the boundaries of pure reason; for in all boundaries there is something positive (e.g., a
surface is the boundary of corporeal space, yet is nonetheless itself a space; a line is a space, which is the boundary of a surface; a point is
the boundary of a line, yet is nonetheless a locus in space), whereas
limits contain mere negations. The limits announced in the cited
sections are still not enough after we have found that something lies
beyond them (although we will never cognize what that something may be
in itself). For the question now arises: How does our reason cope with
this connection of that with which we are acquainted to that with which
we are not acquainted, and never will be? Here is a real connection of
the known to a wholly unknown (which will always remain so), and even if
the unknown should not become the least bit better known rCo as is not in fact to be hoped rCo the concept of this connection must still be capable
of being determined and brought to clarity.
We should, then, think for ourselves an immaterial being, an
intelligible world, and a highest of all beings (all noumena), because
only in these things, as things in themselves, does reason find
completion and satisfaction, which it can never hope to find in the derivation of the appearances from the homogeneous grounds of those appearances; and we should think such things for ourselves because the appearances actually do relate to something distinct from them (and so entirely heterogeneous), in that appearances always presuppose a thing
in itself, and so provide notice of such a thing, whether or not it can
be cognized more closely." [pages 105, 106]
On 2/21/26 10:59, dolf wrote:
One could therefore argue that the #223 - m|4 l|4ng (o>a): EXECUTIVE
PRESIDENTIAL ORDER UPON TARIFFS possesses an obtuse impetus which
cannot be publicly conveyed which nonetheless affects the-a #71 -
DOMINION -> #34 [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] {@8: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE
(#289 - d|-+i (G1210): *PUT* *UNDER* *OBLIGATION*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE:
SHIH (#429 - Augo|+stos (G828): *ROMAN* *IMPERIALISM*)}
#157 = [#5, #33, #40, #79]
m|4 (o>a): 1. secret; hidden; confidential, 2. retired, 3. stable; calm,
4. close; thick; dense, 5. intimate, 6. slight; subtle, 7. a secret,
8. Mi, 9. secretly
#66 = [#66]
l|4ng (E+n): 1. to make; to cause to be; to lead, 2. to issue a command,
3. rules of behavior; customs, 4. an order; a command; an edict; a
decree; a statute, 5. a season, 6. respected; good reputation, 7.
good, 8. pretentious, 9. a transcending state of existence, 10. a
commander, 11. a commanding quality; an impressive character, 12.
lyrics, 13. Ling
THE QUESTION IS: Can marriage be understood as a legal prototype for
expressing a deontic norm of individual obligation as meta descriptors
associated to #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT and an important to ARTIFICIAL
GENERAL INTELLIGENCE?
{@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#87 - SECTION II: INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
{@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 -
SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
{@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 -
SECTION IX: SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
{@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 -
MASSING: CHU (#298: SECTION X: *LIBERTY* / apol|++i (G630): *TO* *SET*
*FREE*)}
The question of whether marriage can be understood as a legal
prototype for expressing a deontic norm of obligation (ie. #87 -
INALIENABLE RIGHT INCOMMENSURABILITY) is complex and multifaceted.
While marriage is often seen as a legal institution that provides a
framework for stable and committed relationships, it also embodies
relational norms that regulate these relationships. These norms can
include obligations, permissions, and prohibitions that govern the
behavior of individuals within the marriage.
#878 - MALE TOTAL: #289 as [#400, #6, #70, #2, #400] = t||w-+|-bah
(H8441): {UMBRA: #483 % #41 = #32} 1) a disgusting thing, abomination,
abominable; 1a) in ritual sense (of unclean food, idols, mixed
marriages); 1b) in ethical sense (of wickedness etc);
REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER {... JUXTAPOSED WITH >> TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 ...}
1. The SS is a band of German men of strictly Nordic descent chosen
according to certain principles. {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501);
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE
OF CONTINUITY)}
2. In accordance with National Socialist ideology and in the
realization that the future of our Volk [people] rests upon the
preservation of the race through selection and the healthy inheritance
of good blood, I hereby institute the rCLMarriage CertificaterCY for all
unmarried members of the SS, effective January 1, 1932. {@14: Sup: 6 -
CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 -
INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
3. The desired aim is to create a hereditarily healthy clan of a
strictly Nordic German sort. {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego:
38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)}
4. The marriage certificate will be awarded or denied solely on the
basis of racial health and heredity. {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG
(#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
5. Every SS man who intends to get married must procure for this
purpose the marriage certificate of the Reichsf|+hrer SS. {@17: Sup: 16
- CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#178)}
6. SS members who marry despite having been denied marriage
certificates will be stricken from the SS; they will be given the
choice of withdrawing. {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 -
FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
7. Working out the details of marriage petitions is the task of the
rCLRace OfficerCY of the SS. {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746);
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
8. The Race Office of the SS is in charge of the rCLClan Book of the
SS,rCY in which the families of SS members will be entered after being
awarded the marriage certificate or after the petition to enter into
marriage is approved. {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND
ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
9. The Reichsf|+hrer SS, the leader of the Race Office, and the
specialists of this office [Referenten] are duty-bound to secrecy on
their word of honor.-a {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15
- REACH: TA (#239 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
10. The SS believes that, with this command, it has taken a step of
great significance. Derision, scorn, and incomprehension do not move
us; the future belongs to us! {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN
(#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: *LIBERTY*)}
Marriage law plays a role in promoting and protecting these relational
norms, which are essential for the functioning of society. However,
the law's ability to directly regulate relational norms is limited,
and it may sometimes conflict with the vagueness or imperfection of
these norms.
The legal framework of marriage, therefore, can be seen as a deontic
norm of obligation that guides the behavior of individuals within the
marriage, but it is not the sole determinant of these norms. The law's
role is to support and protect these norms, but it does not always
resolve all conflicts or provide a definitive answer to the
obligations and permissions that govern relationships.
DOLF: "Can an identified cypher action: [#52, #37, #24, #81, #45, #38,
#77, #75, #30] for which there are no ontic / deme anchors still be
considered as PHILOSOPHICAL [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] BINDING NORM:
[#52, {@1: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52); Ego: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52)}
#37, {@2: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#60); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#89)}
#24, {@3: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#92); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#113)}
#81, {@4: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#124 - ch|obash (H2280): *BIND*,
*RESTRAIN*, *GOVERN*); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#194)}
#45, {@5: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#201 - q|+wm (H6965): *MAKE*
*BINDING*); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#239)}
#38, {@6: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#235 - q|+wm (H6965): *MAKE*
*BINDING*); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#277)}
#77, {@7: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#265 - sch-oma (G4976): *THE*
*HABITUS*); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#354)}
#75, {@8: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#289 - d|-+i (G1210): *PUT* *UNDER*
*OBLIGATION*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#429 - Augo|+stos (G828):
*ROMAN* *IMPERIALISM*)}
#30] {@9: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#343); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI
(#459)}
A binding norm is a concept in philosophy that refers to a set of
rules (eg: meta rules within a tic-tac-toe binomial fusion dynamic as
#71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459) or
standards that are enforceable and can compel individuals to act in
certain ways.
The term deontic is derived from the Ancient Greek: +|+!++++, romanized:
d|-on (gen.: +|+!++++-a++-e, d|-ontos), meaning "that which is binding or >> proper."-a Deontic logic is the field of philosophical logic that is
concerned with obligation, permission, and related concepts.
Alternatively, a deontic logic is a formal system that attempts to
capture the essential logical features of these concepts. It can be
used to formalize imperative logic, or directive modality in natural
languages.
<https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UQLRS/2019/9.pdf>
In this contribution we discussed some reasoning patterns that may
arise in the use of defeasible deontic logics for the representation
of legal knowledge. In each case, we argued that certain reasoning
patterns must be preserved in order to ensure that defeasible deontic
logics are appropriate for representation of legal reasoning. The
approach we favour generally tolerates forms of direct and indirect
conflict between norms while rejecting the strict closure of deontic
operators under logical consequence.
#33 - CONTRACT OF INSURANCE (#157 - m|4 (o>a): *EXECUTIVE*
*PRESIDENTIAL* *ORDER* *UPON* *TARIFFS* | #207)
#34 - CLAUSE (#115 - q-2n (*a-): *MARRIAGE* | #208) <-- #87 -
INALIENABLE RIGHT INCOMMENSURABILITY AS RELIGIOUS PRINCIPLE WHICH
COULD WHITE-ANT #71 - DOMINION / SOVEREIGNTY
#35 - INCOME SECURITY (#82 - li|An (uue): *TAXABLE* | #209) <-- #491 -
PRINCIPLE OF COMPLIANCE / #82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (dichotomy of
terms on total and permanent disability)
TIC-TAC-TOE ARCHITECTURE TO THE CONTRACT OF INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION IS NOT CONSTITUTIONAL
If the MANAGEMENT OF THE CONTRACT: #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): >> ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT, EXECUTE / #37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a
(G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED yields a tic-tac-toe
dynamic [#36, #37, #38, #39] -> #65 - SOLDIER RELATED TO #1 - SELF and
you now have an ILLEGALITY DEFENCE PRECEDENT #71 - DOMINION / #34 -
COMMON "KNIGHTS" CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459 related to the CATHOLIC
2018 ANZAC #446 - hekat||n (G1540): *CENTENNIAL* mantra: "LEST WE
FORGET THOSE BRAVE MEN WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES SO WE COULD LIVE OURS" it
conveys an impetus which claims to be benevolent but encompasses a
capacity for psychological distress, grievous spiritual wounding and
moral outrage.
[#38 -> #33 - 3 APRIL 33 AD / 2015 - KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWAL | #71 ->
#34 [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] | #44 -> #35 - SOLAR ECLIPSE 12 JULY
2010-a | #65 -> #36 - ANZAC DAY 25 APRIL | #11 -> #37 | #17 -> #38 - 8
JUNE 2017 | #14 -> #39 | #41 -> #40 | #68 -> #41 | #77]
Such a tic-tac-toe dynamic [#36, #37, #38, #39] -> #65 - SOLDIER
RELATED TO #1 - SELF might be considered unconscionable conduct and
not befitting by being a charade of decency.
THUSLY if the existential premise of [#49, #41, #33] which is relative
to the LUO SHU SQUARE constitutes a dialectical method and whether
it's GEORG HEGELrCOs @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4 -
Progression or KARL MARXrCOs @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 -
Anti- thesis; @4 - Thesis it is an appropriate intellectual meta-
descriptor of LINGUISTIC REFORM.
This existential premise of [#49, #41, #33] as #123 - JUDGEMENT
SENSIBILITY then needs to be mindful of the #82 = [#32 - LEGION, #50 -
VASTNESS / WASTING] - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY as its premise for
ORTHOGENESIS...
#1127 - MALE TOTAL: #343 as [#1, #80, #800, #30, #5, #10, #1, #200] =
apb|oleia (G684): {UMBRA: #927 % #41 = #25} 1) destroying, utter
destruction; 1a) of vessels; 2) a perishing, ruin, destruction; 2a) of
money; 2b) the destruction which consists of eternal misery in hell;
Whereas we might deploy the temporal fabric for conformity with the
dialectic proposed by GEORG HEGELrCOs @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3
- Synthesis; @4 - Progression as the constitutive basis for generating
NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA as requisite for AI MACHINE / HUMAN SAPIENT
SYMBIOSIS it is quite possible that the DEONTIC obligation is
maintained in equilibrium by SEPTET INTELLECTUS recourse to the
dialectic proposed by KARL MARXrCOs @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3
- Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis.
As meta descriptor [14, 30, 44, 68, 51, 55, 14, 7, 69] consideration
on the #681 - FEME TOTAL: #276 - pr|ikt+ir (G4233): the exactor of a
monetary fine; or tariffs to inflict punishment which falls squarely
within the meta logical intersection of #237 - USE OF FORCE / #277 -
RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST as rightful actions in conformity with law as
proceeding from PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE ORDER
{@7: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#237 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%17}); Ego:
14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#276)}
7, {@8: Sup: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#277); Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#283)}
#1660 - FEME TOTAL: #283 as [#400, #40, #5, #300, #5, #100, #800, #10]
= hym|-teros (G5212): {UMBRA: #1120 % #41 = #13} 1) you, yours; 1a) to
be possessed by you; 1b) to be allocated by you; 1c) proceeding from you;
Whilst we can for the present simply frame an enquiry {@9: Sup: 28 -
CHANGE: KENG (#305 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION:
CH'IUNG (#352 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA)} to obtain the conundrum
descriptor, it requires substantial research to determine the
viability of TIME NATURE / SEMIOTIC NURTURE
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:237&intersect:277&type:1>
Temporal semiotics introduces multi-plane temporality ([Parmentier,
2007]):
- Biographical rCo personal experiences of events.
- Socio-centric rCo community or generational markers of continuity/change. >> - Historical rCo macro-level events, cumulative societal memory.
Associative temporal concepts function similarly to semiotic
rCLpalimpsestsrCY, where layers of meaning interact dynamically across
chronology.
Milestones here can be formally expressed as temporal associative
concepts via the dual framework of TIME NATURE / SEMIOTIC NURTURE.
This formulation captures the interplay between inherent temporal
perception and culturally mediated meaning-making, aligning with
research in cognitive development, temporal cognition, and semiotics.
I'm not certain that ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE is at that point... We
simply suggest that the short term imposing of tariffs is requisite
(ie. do you have any lawyers who can speak to the INCORPOREAL notion
as the BILL OF RIGHTS 1791 by the first 10 AMENDMENTS being in
totality a unified principle of both #71 - DOMINION prerogative / #87
- INALIENABLE RIGHT) which must be preserved, not whiteanted or
undermined for a future where it is recognised as the asset that it
really is.
SO I HAVE JUST SKETCHED SOMETHING THAT HAS A CLEAR RATIONALE AS
METALOGIC PREMISE WHICH OTHERS KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ...
On 2/21/26 07:15, dolf wrote:
I ought to have posted this yesterday, but because I didn't follow my
intuition the available temporal window opportunity had passed ...
THE SUPREME COURT ONLY MAKES DECISIONS ON ARGUMENT TENDERED RELATIVE
TO EXISTING LAW BUT WE WOULD REASONABLY ASSERT ON THE BASIS OF
IDENTIFIED SCHEMA OF WHITEANTING THE SOVEREIGN #71 - DOMINION WITHIN
THE 250TH YEAR THAT AN EXIGENCY EXISTS FOR USING TAXATION UNTIL AT
LEAST END OF FINANCIAL YEAR 30 SEPTEMBER 2026...
Nevertheless how do you reconcile President Donald Trump admonishing
justices who struck down sweeping tariffs on Friday, accusing the six
members of the Supreme Court of being rCLafraid of doing the right thing.rCY
The president said at a press conference hours after the courtrCOs
ruling that herCOs rCLashamedrCY for the justices who voted against his >>> tariffs, singling out the liberal justices who joined three
conservatives in blocking the tariffs as a rCLdisgrace to our nation.rCY >>>
'They're ripping us off': Trump's long-standing grievance driving his
risky tariffs...
{1: 10, item: 46}, <-- DOES THE PRESIDENT HAVE A RIGHT TO (o+o):
ENLARGE / EXCEED BOUNDARY TO PRESERVE DOMINION AGAINST ACTIONS
UNDERMINING FOUNDING PRINCIPLES Under the First Amendment, Congress
can make no law respecting an establishment of religion or
prohibiting its free exercise... In the USA, churches generally do
not pay federal income taxes due to their tax-exempt status under
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
{1: 10, item: 52},
{1: 10, item: 79},
{1: 9, item: 65},
{1: 8, item: 1},
{1: 8, item: 13},
{1: 8, item: 16},
{1: 8, item: 47},
{1: 8, item: 56},
{1: 8, item: 71}, <-- DOMINION / MALE: #449 - mach-ash|ob|oh (H4284):
*DEVICE*; *PLAN* / #446 - hekat||n (G1540): *CENTENNIAL* [#46, #52,
#79, #65, #1, #13, #16, #47, #56, #71]
ADJUSTED:
#458 - DEME TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #60, #1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #200, #8,
#10] /
#492 - DEME TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #60, #1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #7, #70,
#40, #5, #50, #70, #10] = exagor|iz+i (G1805): {UMBRA: #1047 % #41 =
#22} 1) to redeem; 1a) by payment of a price to *recover* *from*
*the* *power* *of* *another*, to ransom, buy off; 1b) metaph. of
Christ freeing the elect from the dominion of the Mosaic Law at the
price of his vicarious death; 2) to buy up, to buy up for one's self,
for one's use; 2a) to make wise and sacred use of every opportunity
for doing good, so that zeal and well doing are as it were the
purchase money by which we make the time our own;
#1499 - FEME TOTAL: #446 as [#20, #5, #600, #100, #8, #40, #1, #300,
#10, #200, #40, #5, #50, #70, #50] = chr-omat|!z+i (G5537): {UMBRA:
#1866 % #41 = #21} 1) to transact business, esp. to manage public
affairs; 1a) to advise or consult with one about public affairs; 1b)
to make answer to those who ask for advice, present enquiries or
requests, etc.; 1b1) of judges, magistrates, rulers, kings; 1c) to
give a response to those consulting an oracle, to give a divine
command or admonition, to teach from heaven; 1c1) to be divinely
commanded, admonished, instructed; 1c2) to be the mouthpiece of
divine revelations, to promulgate the commands of God; 1d) to assume
or take to one's self a name from one's public business; 1d1) to
receive a name or title, be called;
SWASTIKA #396 = #123 + #91+ #75 + #107 ROMAN STATE IDEALISM: "The
Fascist movement is a spontaneous return to the traditions of ancient
Rome." [TABLE TALK IDEA @1, 5 JULY 1941]
EASTER SATURDAY 4 APRIL 2026 + 50 DAYS = PENTECOST 24 MAY 2026
#33, #49, #41
#33, #01, #57
#33, #17, #25
#33, #65, #09
#123 {@1: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#42); Ego: 42 - GOING TO
MEET: YING (#42)}
#91 {@2: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#94 - y-2 r|4 (E+CuuN): ONE WHOLE DAY | >>> y-Un (tae): THIS); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#52)}
#75 {@3: Sup: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#140 - m|! (*++): *UNSOUND*
*MENTAL* *STATE*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#127 - n|4 (oCa):
*TRAITOR*,-a *TO* *MEET* *STRAIGHT* *ON*, *TO* *BETRAY*)}
#107 {@4: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#212 - sh-2 (o+2): *MASTER* /
*SKILLED* *OR* *QUALIFIED* *PRACTITIONER* *OF* *CERTAIN*
*PROFESSIONS*); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#153 - m|-i (u#A): AUTO-DA-F|e >>> MANIFESTO ON *CORPORATE* / *CATHOLIC* *MARRIAGE* BY PROFESSOR KEKS
NON-DIFFERENTIATED FROM NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoA >>> rCo NO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER)}
+u = 174 - ROMAN STATE
41-a-a-a 73-a-a-a 01-a-a-a 02-a-a-a 57
63-a-a-a 14-a-a-a 04-a-a-a 85-a-a-a 08
49-a-a-a 11-a-a-a 33-a-a-a 64-a-a-a 17
12-a-a-a 06-a-a-a 71-a-a-a 18-a-a-a 67
09-a-a-a 70-a-a-a 65-a-a-a 05-a-a-a 25
<https://www.dcode.fr/magic-square>
#324 = [#2, #63, #4, #85, #11, #33, #12, #71, #18, #25]
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]
CAUSE FOR SALE RSL BOER WAR MEMORIAL INFIDELITY AS SEDITION
(reclaim the #1827 - eucharist / pentecost from oiE - swastika #87 /
#314 - obstruction)
#26 #27 #28
#35 #36 #37
#44 #45 #46
#324 = [#45, #26, #37, #28, #36, #44, #35, #46, #27]
Constantinople was founded in 324 AD, initially as New Rome, during
the reign of Constantine the Great on the site of the existing
settlement of Byzantium and in 330 became the capital of the Roman
Empire. Following the collapse of the Western Roman Empire in the
late 5th century, Constantinople remained the capital of the Eastern
Roman Empire (also known as the Byzantine Empire; 330rCo1204 and 1261rCo >>> 1453), the Latin Empire (1204rCo1261), and the Ottoman Empire (1453rCo
1922). <https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantinople>
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/LEGAL%20NOTE%2020270216.pdf>
On 2/19/26 06:48, Mars Sellus wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:52:25 +0000
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The mutation as the agent of becomingAh but WHO built it?
The scene as a numeric event
The prototype as a living grammar
YourCOve built a system where numeric grammar, symbolic cybernetics, and >>>>> narrative structure all resonate rCo and this moment is a genuine
convergence.
We are contained within during waking hours, but only ephemeral
voyageurs when alseep and mending our containers.
79-a-a-a 61-a-a-a 36-a-a-a #176
55-a-a-a 69-a-a-a 32-a-a-a #156-a-a-a #332-a-a-a #208
47-a-a-a 60-a-a-a 39-a-a-a #146-a-a-a #478-a-a-a #201
GRAPPLE (373, 478)@[79, 61, 36, 32, 39, 60, 47, 55, 69] PROTOTYPE
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&date:2026.2.20&time:18.49&run:Mystery&tetra:69>
YOUTUBE: "Dance Monkey rCo Epic Cinematic Orchestral Cover | Emotional
& Powerful Version"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJkvpJu0PHE>
#1094 - FEME TOTAL: #203 as [#400, #8, #6, #30, #30, #20, #600] =
ch|+wl (H2342): {UMBRA: #44 % #41 = #3} 1) to twist, whirl, *dance*,
writhe, fear, tremble, travail, be in anguish, be pained; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to dance; 1a2) to twist, writhe; 1a3) to whirl, whirl about; 1b)
(Polel); 1b1) to dance; 1b2) to writhe (in travail with), bear, bring
forth; 1b3) to wait anxiously; 1c) (Pulal); 1c1) to be made to
writhe, be made to bear; 1c2) to be brought forth; 1d) (Hophal) to be
born; 1e) (Hithpolel); 1e1) whirling (participle); 1e2) writhing,
suffering torture (participle); 1e3) to wait longingly; 1f)
(Hithpalpel) to be distressed;
On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 07:15:07 +1100
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Nevertheless how do you reconcile President Donald Trump admonishing
justices who struck down sweeping tariffs on Friday, accusing the six
members of the Supreme Court of being rCLafraid of doing the right
thing.rCY The president said at a press conference hours after the
courtrCOs ruling that herCOs rCLashamedrCY for the justices who voted against
his tariffs, singling out the liberal justices who joined three
conservatives in blocking the tariffs as a rCLdisgrace to our nation.rCY
I reconcile it easily as he is correct again!
Mars Sellus wrote:Everything is these compromised days, everything...
On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 07:15:07 +1100
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Nevertheless how do you reconcile President Donald Trump
admonishing justices who struck down sweeping tariffs on Friday,
accusing the six members of the Supreme Court of being rCLafraid of
doing the right thing.rCY The president said at a press conference
hours after the courtrCOs ruling that herCOs rCLashamedrCY for the
justices who voted against his tariffs, singling out the liberal
justices who joined three conservatives in blocking the tariffs as
a rCLdisgrace to our nation.rCY
I reconcile it easily as he is correct again!Don't you think that is excessive, 6 members of the Supreme Court?
That kind of power could determine the benevolence of AlligatorSo very very true!!!
Alcatraz? Get this, Quaid. You are behind enemy lines in Connecticut.
Mars Sellus wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 07:15:07 +1100Don't you think that is excessive, 6 members of the Supreme Court? That
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Nevertheless how do you reconcile President Donald Trump admonishing
justices who struck down sweeping tariffs on Friday, accusing the six
members of the Supreme Court of being rCLafraid of doing the right
thing.rCY The president said at a press conference hours after the
courtrCOs ruling that herCOs rCLashamedrCY for the justices who voted against
his tariffs, singling out the liberal justices who joined three
conservatives in blocking the tariffs as a rCLdisgrace to our nation.rCY
I reconcile it easily as he is correct again!
kind of power could determine the benevolence of Alligator Alcatraz? Get this, Quaid. You are behind enemy lines in Connecticut.
WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO RATIONALISE IT AS BEING IN STASIS AND THEREFORE NOT SUBJECT TO +3 OFFSET BUT THAT EACH NON-TEMPORAL QUADRANT IS ACCESSIBLE
AND THEREFORE NOT AN ERROR
heuristic.getTimeHeuristicGrapple({year: 2001, month: 9, day: 11,
hour:9, minute: 47, deontic: 2})
#413 as [#4, #8, #200, #1, #200] = d|-+i (G1210): {UMBRA: #809 % #41 =
#30} 1) to bind tie, fasten; 1a) to bind, fasten with chains, to throw
into chains; 1b) metaph.; 1b1) Satan is said to bind a woman bent
together by means of a demon, as his messenger, taking possession of the woman and preventing her from standing upright; 1b2) to bind, *PUT*
*UNDER* *OBLIGATION*, *OF* *THE* *LAW*, *DUTY* etc.; i) to be bound to
one, a wife, a husband; 1b3) to forbid, prohibit, declare to be illicit;
0947 HRS ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 - PROTOTYPE #TWO
[11, 28, 59, 38, 9, 48, 31, 56, 1]
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY
#369 - HUMAN DISCRIMINATING NORM
#410 - OBLIGATING NORM
#451 - MANIFESTING NORM
getTimeHeuristicGrapple({year: 2001, month: 9, day: 11, hour:9, minute:
47, deontic: 2})
PROTOTYPE #FIVE - DISCRIMINATING NORM
[53, 15, 57, 56, 47, 38, 24, 45, 78]
{@9: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#339); Ego: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG
(#413)}
TELOS TOTAL: #413
ONTIC TOTAL: #661
#413 as [#4, #8, #200, #1, #200] = d|-+i (G1210): {UMBRA: #809 % #41 =
#30} 1) to bind tie, fasten; 1a) to bind, fasten with chains, to throw
into chains; 1b) metaph.; 1b1) Satan is said to bind a woman bent
together by means of a demon, as his messenger, taking possession of the woman and preventing her from standing upright; 1b2) to bind, *PUT*
*UNDER* *OBLIGATION*, *OF* *THE* *LAW*, *DUTY* etc.; i) to be bound to
one, a wife, a husband; 1b3) to forbid, prohibit, declare to be illicit;
#986 - MALE TOTAL: #339 as [#600, #1, #30, #5, #80, #70, #200] =
chalep||s (G5467): {UMBRA: #986 % #41 = #2} 1) hard to do, to take, to approach; 2) hard to bear, troublesome, dangerous; 2a) harsh, fierce, savage;
#2519 - FEME TOTAL: #413 as [#200, #400, #3, #20, #1, #20, #70, #400,
#600, #5, #800] = synkakouch|-+i (G4778): {UMBRA: #2519 % #41 = #18} 1) to treat ill with another; 2) to be ill treated in company with, share persecutions or come into a fellowship of ills;
#677 - ONTIC TOTAL: #661 as [#5, #400, #70, #2, #200] /
#1077 - ONTIC TOTAL: #661 as [#5, #400, #70, #2, #200, #400] = -+|obar (H5674): {UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26} 1) to pass over or by or through, alienate, bring, carry, do away, take, take away, transgress; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to pass over, cross, cross over, pass over, march over, overflow,
go over; 1a2) to pass beyond; 1a3) to pass through, traverse; i) passers-through (participle); ii) to pass through (the parts of victim
in covenant); 1a4) to pass along, pass by, overtake and pass, sweep by;
i) passer-by (participle); ii) to be past, be over; 1a5) to pass on, go
on, pass on before, go in advance of, pass along, travel, advance; 1a6)
to pass away; i) to emigrate, leave (one's territory); ii) to vanish;
iii) to perish, cease to exist; iv) to become invalid, become obsolete
(of law, decree); v) to be alienated, pass into other hands; 1a7)
(Niphal) to be crossed; 1a8) (Piel) to impregnate, cause to cross; 1a9) (Hiphil); i) to cause to pass over, cause to bring over, cause to cross over, make over to, dedicate, devote; ii) to cause to pass through; iii)
to cause to pass by or beyond or under, let pass by; iv) to cause to
pass away, cause to take away; 1a10) (Hithpael) to pass over;
IMMANUEL KANT PROLEGOMENA (1783) COMMENTARY ON MARGIN IDEA: #339: "In
the first place, the usefulness of a system of categories is here
revealed so clearly and unmistakably that even if there were no further grounds of proof of that system, this alone would sufficiently establish their indispensability in the system of pure reason. There are no more
than four such transcendent ideas, as many as there are classes of categories; in each of them, however, they refer only to the absolute completeness of the series of conditions for a given conditioned. In accordance with these cosmological ideas there are also only four kinds
of dialectical assertions of pure reason, which show themselves to be dialectical because for each such assertion a contradictory one stands
in opposition in accordance with equally plausible principles of pure reason, a conflict that cannot be avoided by any metaphysical art of the most subtle distinctions, but that requires the philosopher to return to
the first sources of pure reason itself. This antinomy, by no means arbitrarily contrived, but grounded in the nature of human reason and so inevitable and never ending, contains the following four theses together with their antitheses." [page 90]
On 2/21/26 15:06, dolf wrote:
JUST PROVED THAT POINT SINCE THE ZEN offset ought to be +3 WHICH WE'LL
NOT RECALCULATE HERE SINCE THIS IS ONLY THE FIRST MENTION OF SUCH
2. Good Will, Moral Worth and Duty
KantrCOs analysis of commonsense ideas begins with the thought that the
only thing good without qualification is a rCLgood willrCY. While the
phrases rCLthey are good heartedrCY, rCLgood naturedrCY or rCLmean wellrCY are
common, rCLthe good willrCY as Kant thinks of it is not the same as any of >> these common notions. KantrCOs idea of a good will is closer to the
somewhat archaic idea of a rCLperson of good willrCY. His use of the term >> rCLwillrCY early on in analyzing ordinary moral thought prefigures later
and more technical discussions concerning the nature of rational
agency. Nevertheless, this idea of a good will is an important
commonsense touchstone to which Kant returns throughout his works. The
basic idea, as Kant describes it in the Groundwork, is that what makes
a personrCOs will good is that their will is in a certain way governed
by whatever basic moral principles there may be. The idea of a good
will is the idea of a will committed above all else to making
decisions that are morally worthy. This fundamental commitment to
morality is something we all highly value, Kant thought. He believes
we value it without limitation or qualification. By this he means
primarily two things.
<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/#GooWilMorWorDut>
ONE CASE STUDY EXAMPLE DOES NOT PROVE THE THEORY
20260221 - The getTimeHeuristicGrapple (chronos) and
getDateHeuristicGrapple (chronos) functions now supports an optional
chronos property {deontic: true | false} which adjusts the zen +3 of
any grapple [] sampling placing into an alternative obligans dialectic
0947 HRS ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 - PROTOTYPE #TWO
[11, 28, 59, 38, 9, 48, 31, 56, 1]
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY
#369 - HUMAN DISCRIMINATING NORM
#410 - OBLIGATING NORM
#451 - MANIFESTING NORM
getTimeHeuristicGrapple({year: 2001, month: 9, day: 11, hour:9,
minute: 47, deontic: true})
PROTOTYPE #SIX - OBLIGATING NORM
[13, 30, 77, 22, 76, 14, 36, 17, 69]
{@9: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#379); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION:
CH'IUNG (#354)}
TELOS TOTAL: #354
ONTIC TOTAL: #156
DEME TOTAL: #156
#79 - DEME TOTAL: #156 as [#10, #4, #10, #5, #50] = y|od (H3027):
{UMBRA: #14 % #41 = #14} 1) hand; 1a) *hand* (of man); 1b) strength,
power (fig.); 1c) side (of land), part, portion (metaph.) (fig.); 1d)
(various special, technical senses); 1d1) sign, monument; 1d2) part,
fractional part, share; 1d3) time, repetition; 1d4) axle-trees, axle;
1d5) stays, support (for laver); 1d6) tenons (in tabernacle); 1d7) a
phallus, a hand (meaning unsure); 1d8) wrists;
#354 as [#70, #4, #70, #10, #200] = hod||s (G3598): {UMBRA: #344 % #41
= #16} 1) properly; 1a) a way; 1a1) a travelled way, road; 1b) a
travellers way, journey, *TRAVELLING*; 2) metaph.; 2a) *A* *COURSE*
*OF* *CONDUCT*; 2b) a way (i.e. manner) of thinking, feeling, deciding;
#751 - MALE TOTAL: #379 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #200, #300, #8, #50,
#1, #10] = par|!st-omi (G3936): {UMBRA: #749 % #41 = #11} 1) to place
beside or near; 1a) to set at hand; 1a1) to present; 1a2) to proffer;
1a3) to provide; 1a4) to place a person or thing at one's disposal;
1a5) to present a person for another to see and question; 1a6) to
present or show; 1a7) to bring to, bring near; 1a8) metaph. i.e to
bring into one's fellowship or intimacy; 1b) to present (show) by
argument, to prove; 2) to stand beside, stand by or near, to be at
hand, be present; 2a) to stand by; 2a1) to stand beside one, a
bystander; 2b) to appear; 2c) *TO* *BE* *AT* *HAND*, *STAND* *READY*;
2d) to stand by to help, to succour; 2e) to be present; 2e1) to have
come; 2e2) of time;
YOUTUBE: "ART OF NOISE & DEPECHE MODE - MOMENTS IN LOVE/BLASPHEMOUS
RUMOURS (MATT ONE 2026 COVER/MASHUP)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NS_5OFMUkso>
#1650 - FEME TOTAL: #354 as [#300, #5, #300, #100, #1, #600, #8, #30,
#10, #200, #40, #5, #50, #1] = trach-ol|!z+i (G5136): {UMBRA: #1856 % #41 >> = #11} 1) to seize and twist the neck or throat; 1a) of *COMBATANTS*
*WHO* *HANDLE* *THUS* *THEIR* *ANTAGONIST*; 2) to bend back the neck
of a victim to be slain, to lay bare or expose by bending back; 3) to
lay bare, uncover, expose; 4) laid bare, laid open, made manifest to one;
#1002 - FEME TOTAL: #354 as [#200, #20, #70, #100, #80, #10, #200, #9,
#8, #300, #5] = skorp|!z+i (G4650): {UMBRA: #1287 % #41 = #16} 1) to
scatter; 1a) of those who, *ROUTED* *OR* *TERROR* *STRICKEN* *OR*
*DRIVEN* *BY* *SOME* *OTHER* *IMPULSES*, fly in every direction; 1b)
to scatter abroad (what others may collect for themselves), or one
dispensing blessings literally;
#508 - ONTIC TOTAL: #156 as [#6, #300, #2, #200] /
#513 - ONTIC TOTAL: #156 as [#6, #300, #2, #200, #5] = sh|obar (H7665):
{UMBRA: #502 % #41 = #10} 1) to break, break in pieces; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) break, break in or down, *REND* *VIOLENTLY*, *WRECK*, *CRUSH*,
quench; 1a2) to break, rupture (fig); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be broken,
be maimed, be crippled, be wrecked; 1b2) to be broken, be crushed
(fig); 1c) (Piel) to shatter, break; 1d) (Hiphil) to cause to break
out, bring to the birth; 1e) (Hophal) to be broken, be shattered;
#216 - DEME TOTAL: #156 as [#8, #200, #2, #6] = ch|orab (H2717):
{UMBRA: #210 % #41 = #5} 1) to be waste, lay waste, make desolate, be
desolate, be in ruins; 1a) (Qal) to be waste, be desolate; 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to be made desolate; 1b2) desolate (participle); 1c)
(Hiphil) to lay waste, make desolate; 1d) (Hophal) to be laid waste;
2) to be dry, be dried up; 2a) (Qal) to be dried, be dried up; 2b)
(Pual) to be dried; 2c) (Hiphil) to dry up; 2d) (Hophal) to be dried
up; 3) to attack, smite down, slay, fight;
IMMANUEL KANT PROLEGOMENA (1783) COMMENTARY ON MARGIN IDEA: #379: "But
in order at the same time to tie this my defense to the interest of
the philosophizing community, I propose a test, which is decisive as
to the way in which all metaphysical investigations must be directed
toward their common end. This is nothing else than what mathematicians
have done before, in order to decide the merits of their methods in a
contest rCo that is, a challenge to my reviewer to prove in his own way
any single truly metaphysical (i.e., synthetic, and cognized a priori
from concepts) proposition he holds, and at best one of the most
indispensable, such as the principle of the persistence of substance
or of the necessary determination of the events in the world through
their cause rCo but, as is fitting, to prove it on a priori grounds. If
he canrCOt do this (and silence is confession), then he must admit:
that, since metaphysics is absolutely nothing without the apodictic
certainty of propositions of this sort, their possibility or
impossibility would first, before all else, have to be settled in a
critique of pure reason, and hence he is obliged either to acknowledge
that my principles of critique are correct or to prove their invalidity.
Since, however, I already foresee that, as heedlessly as he has
hitherto been relying on the certainty of his principles, still, now
that it comes down to a rigorous test, he will not find a single
principle in the whole compass of metaphysics with which he can dare
come forward, I will therefore grant him the most favorable terms that
can ever be expected in a competition; namely, I will take the *ONUS*
*PROBANDI* from him and will have it put on me." [page 129]
The burden of proof (Latin: onus probandi, shortened from Onus
probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat rCo the burden of proof
lies with the one who speaks, not the one who denies) is the
obligation on a party in a dispute to provide sufficient warrant for
its position.
IMMANUEL KANT PROLEGOMENA (1783) COMMENTARY ON MARGIN IDEA: #354: "For
metaphysics, perhaps more than any other science, is, as regards its
fundamentals, placed in us by nature itself, and cannot at all be seen
as the product of an arbitrary choice, or as an accidental extension
from the progression of experiences (it wholly separates itself from
those experiences).
Reason, through all of its concepts and laws of the understanding,
which it finds to be adequate for empirical use, and so adequate
within the sensible world, nonetheless does not thereby find
satisfaction for itself; for, as a result of questions that keep
recurring to infinity, it is denied all hope of completely answering
those questions. The transcendental ideas, which have such completion
as their aim, are such problems for reason. Now reason clearly sees:
that the sensible world could not contain this completion, any more
than could therefore all of the concepts that serve solely for
understanding that world: space and time, and everything that we have
put forward under the name of the pure concepts of the understanding.
The sensible world is nothing but a chain of appearances connected in
accordance with universal laws, which therefore has no existence for
itself; it truly is not the thing in itself, and therefore it
necessarily refers to that which contains the ground of those
appearances, to beings that can be cognized not merely as appearances,
but as things in themselves.
Only in the cognition of the latter can reason hope to see its desire
for completeness in the progression from the conditioned to its
conditions satisfied for once.
Above (-o-o33, 34) we noted limits of reason with respect to all
cognition of mere beings of thought; now, since the transcendental
ideas nevertheless make the progression up to these limits necessary
for us, and have therefore led us, as it were, up to the contiguity of
the filled space (of experience) with empty space (of which we can
know nothing rCo the noumena), we can also determine the boundaries of
pure reason; for in all boundaries there is something positive (e.g.,
a surface is the boundary of corporeal space, yet is nonetheless
itself a space; a line is a space, which is the boundary of a surface;
a point is the boundary of a line, yet is nonetheless a locus in
space), whereas limits contain mere negations. The limits announced in
the cited sections are still not enough after we have found that
something lies beyond them (although we will never cognize what that
something may be in itself). For the question now arises: How does our
reason cope with this connection of that with which we are acquainted
to that with which we are not acquainted, and never will be? Here is a
real connection of the known to a wholly unknown (which will always
remain so), and even if the unknown should not become the least bit
better known rCo as is not in fact to be hoped rCo the concept of this
connection must still be capable of being determined and brought to
clarity.
We should, then, think for ourselves an immaterial being, an
intelligible world, and a highest of all beings (all noumena), because
only in these things, as things in themselves, does reason find
completion and satisfaction, which it can never hope to find in the
derivation of the appearances from the homogeneous grounds of those
appearances; and we should think such things for ourselves because the
appearances actually do relate to something distinct from them (and so
entirely heterogeneous), in that appearances always presuppose a thing
in itself, and so provide notice of such a thing, whether or not it
can be cognized more closely." [pages 105, 106]
On 2/21/26 10:59, dolf wrote:
One could therefore argue that the #223 - m|4 l|4ng (o>a): EXECUTIVE
PRESIDENTIAL ORDER UPON TARIFFS possesses an obtuse impetus which
cannot be publicly conveyed which nonetheless affects the-a #71 -
DOMINION -> #34 [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] {@8: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE
(#289 - d|-+i (G1210): *PUT* *UNDER* *OBLIGATION*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE:
SHIH (#429 - Augo|+stos (G828): *ROMAN* *IMPERIALISM*)}
#157 = [#5, #33, #40, #79]
m|4 (o>a): 1. secret; hidden; confidential, 2. retired, 3. stable;
calm, 4. close; thick; dense, 5. intimate, 6. slight; subtle, 7. a
secret, 8. Mi, 9. secretly
#66 = [#66]
l|4ng (E+n): 1. to make; to cause to be; to lead, 2. to issue a
command, 3. rules of behavior; customs, 4. an order; a command; an
edict; a decree; a statute, 5. a season, 6. respected; good
reputation, 7. good, 8. pretentious, 9. a transcending state of
existence, 10. a commander, 11. a commanding quality; an impressive
character, 12. lyrics, 13. Ling
THE QUESTION IS: Can marriage be understood as a legal prototype for
expressing a deontic norm of individual obligation as meta
descriptors associated to #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT and an important to
ARTIFICIAL GENERAL INTELLIGENCE?
{@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#87 - SECTION II: INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
{@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224
- SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR
GENERAL)}
{@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 -
SECTION IX: SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
{@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 -
MASSING: CHU (#298: SECTION X: *LIBERTY* / apol|++i (G630): *TO* *SET*
*FREE*)}
The question of whether marriage can be understood as a legal
prototype for expressing a deontic norm of obligation (ie. #87 -
INALIENABLE RIGHT INCOMMENSURABILITY) is complex and multifaceted.
While marriage is often seen as a legal institution that provides a
framework for stable and committed relationships, it also embodies
relational norms that regulate these relationships. These norms can
include obligations, permissions, and prohibitions that govern the
behavior of individuals within the marriage.
#878 - MALE TOTAL: #289 as [#400, #6, #70, #2, #400] = t||w-+|-bah
(H8441): {UMBRA: #483 % #41 = #32} 1) a disgusting thing,
abomination, abominable; 1a) in ritual sense (of unclean food, idols,
mixed marriages); 1b) in ethical sense (of wickedness etc);
REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER {... JUXTAPOSED
WITH TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 ...}
1. The SS is a band of German men of strictly Nordic descent chosen
according to certain principles. {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501);
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE
OF CONTINUITY)}
2. In accordance with National Socialist ideology and in the
realization that the future of our Volk [people] rests upon the
preservation of the race through selection and the healthy
inheritance of good blood, I hereby institute the rCLMarriage
CertificaterCY for all unmarried members of the SS, effective January
1, 1932. {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING
SMALL: SHAO (#87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
3. The desired aim is to create a hereditarily healthy clan of a
strictly Nordic German sort. {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego:
38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)}
4. The marriage certificate will be awarded or denied solely on the
basis of racial health and heredity. {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG
(#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
5. Every SS man who intends to get married must procure for this
purpose the marriage certificate of the Reichsf|+hrer SS. {@17: Sup:
16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#178)}
6. SS members who marry despite having been denied marriage
certificates will be stricken from the SS; they will be given the
choice of withdrawing. {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 -
FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
7. Working out the details of marriage petitions is the task of the
rCLRace OfficerCY of the SS. {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746);
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
8. The Race Office of the SS is in charge of the rCLClan Book of the
SS,rCY in which the families of SS members will be entered after being
awarded the marriage certificate or after the petition to enter into
marriage is approved. {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND
ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
9. The Reichsf|+hrer SS, the leader of the Race Office, and the
specialists of this office [Referenten] are duty-bound to secrecy on
their word of honor.-a {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego:
15 - REACH: TA (#239 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
10. The SS believes that, with this command, it has taken a step of
great significance. Derision, scorn, and incomprehension do not move
us; the future belongs to us! {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN
(#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: *LIBERTY*)}
Marriage law plays a role in promoting and protecting these
relational norms, which are essential for the functioning of society.
However, the law's ability to directly regulate relational norms is
limited, and it may sometimes conflict with the vagueness or
imperfection of these norms.
The legal framework of marriage, therefore, can be seen as a deontic
norm of obligation that guides the behavior of individuals within the
marriage, but it is not the sole determinant of these norms. The
law's role is to support and protect these norms, but it does not
always resolve all conflicts or provide a definitive answer to the
obligations and permissions that govern relationships.
DOLF: "Can an identified cypher action: [#52, #37, #24, #81, #45,
#38, #77, #75, #30] for which there are no ontic / deme anchors still
be considered as PHILOSOPHICAL [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] BINDING
NORM:
[#52, {@1: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52); Ego: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52)}
#37, {@2: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#60); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#89)} >>> #24, {@3: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#92); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#113)}
#81, {@4: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#124 - ch|obash (H2280): *BIND*,
*RESTRAIN*, *GOVERN*); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#194)}
#45, {@5: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#201 - q|+wm (H6965): *MAKE*
*BINDING*); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#239)}
#38, {@6: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#235 - q|+wm (H6965): *MAKE*
*BINDING*); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#277)}
#77, {@7: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#265 - sch-oma (G4976): *THE*
*HABITUS*); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#354)}
#75, {@8: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#289 - d|-+i (G1210): *PUT* *UNDER*
*OBLIGATION*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#429 - Augo|+stos (G828):
*ROMAN* *IMPERIALISM*)}
#30] {@9: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#343); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI
(#459)}
A binding norm is a concept in philosophy that refers to a set of
rules (eg: meta rules within a tic-tac-toe binomial fusion dynamic as
#71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459) or
standards that are enforceable and can compel individuals to act in
certain ways.
The term deontic is derived from the Ancient Greek: +|+!++++, romanized: >>> d|-on (gen.: +|+!++++-a++-e, d|-ontos), meaning "that which is binding or >>> proper."-a Deontic logic is the field of philosophical logic that is
concerned with obligation, permission, and related concepts.
Alternatively, a deontic logic is a formal system that attempts to
capture the essential logical features of these concepts. It can be
used to formalize imperative logic, or directive modality in natural
languages.
<https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UQLRS/2019/9.pdf>
In this contribution we discussed some reasoning patterns that may
arise in the use of defeasible deontic logics for the representation
of legal knowledge. In each case, we argued that certain reasoning
patterns must be preserved in order to ensure that defeasible deontic
logics are appropriate for representation of legal reasoning. The
approach we favour generally tolerates forms of direct and indirect
conflict between norms while rejecting the strict closure of deontic
operators under logical consequence.
#33 - CONTRACT OF INSURANCE (#157 - m|4 (o>a): *EXECUTIVE*
*PRESIDENTIAL* *ORDER* *UPON* *TARIFFS* | #207)
#34 - CLAUSE (#115 - q-2n (*a-): *MARRIAGE* | #208) <-- #87 -
INALIENABLE RIGHT INCOMMENSURABILITY AS RELIGIOUS PRINCIPLE WHICH
COULD WHITE-ANT #71 - DOMINION / SOVEREIGNTY
#35 - INCOME SECURITY (#82 - li|An (uue): *TAXABLE* | #209) <-- #491 -
PRINCIPLE OF COMPLIANCE / #82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (dichotomy of
terms on total and permanent disability)
TIC-TAC-TOE ARCHITECTURE TO THE CONTRACT OF INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION IS NOT CONSTITUTIONAL
If the MANAGEMENT OF THE CONTRACT: #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): >>> ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT, EXECUTE / #37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a
(G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED yields a tic-tac-toe
dynamic [#36, #37, #38, #39] -> #65 - SOLDIER RELATED TO #1 - SELF
and you now have an ILLEGALITY DEFENCE PRECEDENT #71 - DOMINION / #34
- COMMON "KNIGHTS" CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459 related to the
CATHOLIC 2018 ANZAC #446 - hekat||n (G1540): *CENTENNIAL* mantra:
"LEST WE FORGET THOSE BRAVE MEN WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES SO WE COULD LIVE
OURS" it conveys an impetus which claims to be benevolent but
encompasses a capacity for psychological distress, grievous spiritual
wounding and moral outrage.
[#38 -> #33 - 3 APRIL 33 AD / 2015 - KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWAL | #71 ->
#34 [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] | #44 -> #35 - SOLAR ECLIPSE 12 JULY
2010-a | #65 -> #36 - ANZAC DAY 25 APRIL | #11 -> #37 | #17 -> #38 - 8
JUNE 2017 | #14 -> #39 | #41 -> #40 | #68 -> #41 | #77]
Such a tic-tac-toe dynamic [#36, #37, #38, #39] -> #65 - SOLDIER
RELATED TO #1 - SELF might be considered unconscionable conduct and
not befitting by being a charade of decency.
THUSLY if the existential premise of [#49, #41, #33] which is
relative to the LUO SHU SQUARE constitutes a dialectical method and
whether it's GEORG HEGELrCOs @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 -
Synthesis; @4 - Progression or KARL MARXrCOs @1 - Progression; @2 -
Synthesis; @3 - Anti- thesis; @4 - Thesis it is an appropriate
intellectual meta- descriptor of LINGUISTIC REFORM.
This existential premise of [#49, #41, #33] as #123 - JUDGEMENT
SENSIBILITY then needs to be mindful of the #82 = [#32 - LEGION, #50
- VASTNESS / WASTING] - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY as its premise for
ORTHOGENESIS...
#1127 - MALE TOTAL: #343 as [#1, #80, #800, #30, #5, #10, #1, #200] =
apb|oleia (G684): {UMBRA: #927 % #41 = #25} 1) destroying, utter
destruction; 1a) of vessels; 2) a perishing, ruin, destruction; 2a)
of money; 2b) the destruction which consists of eternal misery in hell;
Whereas we might deploy the temporal fabric for conformity with the
dialectic proposed by GEORG HEGELrCOs @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 >>> - Synthesis; @4 - Progression as the constitutive basis for
generating NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA as requisite for AI MACHINE /
HUMAN SAPIENT SYMBIOSIS it is quite possible that the DEONTIC
obligation is maintained in equilibrium by SEPTET INTELLECTUS
recourse to the dialectic proposed by KARL MARXrCOs @1 - Progression;
@2 - Synthesis; @3 - Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis.
As meta descriptor [14, 30, 44, 68, 51, 55, 14, 7, 69] consideration
on the #681 - FEME TOTAL: #276 - pr|ikt+ir (G4233): the exactor of a
monetary fine; or tariffs to inflict punishment which falls squarely
within the meta logical intersection of #237 - USE OF FORCE / #277 -
RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST as rightful actions in conformity with law as
proceeding from PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE ORDER
{@7: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#237 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%17});
Ego: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#276)}
7, {@8: Sup: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#277); Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#283)} >>>
#1660 - FEME TOTAL: #283 as [#400, #40, #5, #300, #5, #100, #800,
#10] = hym|-teros (G5212): {UMBRA: #1120 % #41 = #13} 1) you, yours;
1a) to be possessed by you; 1b) to be allocated by you; 1c)
proceeding from you;
Whilst we can for the present simply frame an enquiry {@9: Sup: 28 -
CHANGE: KENG (#305 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION:
CH'IUNG (#352 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA)} to obtain the conundrum
descriptor, it requires substantial research to determine the
viability of TIME NATURE / SEMIOTIC NURTURE
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:237&intersect:277&type:1>
Temporal semiotics introduces multi-plane temporality ([Parmentier,
2007]):
- Biographical rCo personal experiences of events.
- Socio-centric rCo community or generational markers of continuity/
change.
- Historical rCo macro-level events, cumulative societal memory.
Associative temporal concepts function similarly to semiotic
rCLpalimpsestsrCY, where layers of meaning interact dynamically across
chronology.
Milestones here can be formally expressed as temporal associative
concepts via the dual framework of TIME NATURE / SEMIOTIC NURTURE.
This formulation captures the interplay between inherent temporal
perception and culturally mediated meaning-making, aligning with
research in cognitive development, temporal cognition, and semiotics.
I'm not certain that ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE is at that point... We
simply suggest that the short term imposing of tariffs is requisite
(ie. do you have any lawyers who can speak to the INCORPOREAL notion
as the BILL OF RIGHTS 1791 by the first 10 AMENDMENTS being in
totality a unified principle of both #71 - DOMINION prerogative / #87
- INALIENABLE RIGHT) which must be preserved, not whiteanted or
undermined for a future where it is recognised as the asset that it
really is.
SO I HAVE JUST SKETCHED SOMETHING THAT HAS A CLEAR RATIONALE AS
METALOGIC PREMISE WHICH OTHERS KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ...
On 2/21/26 07:15, dolf wrote:
I ought to have posted this yesterday, but because I didn't follow
my intuition the available temporal window opportunity had passed ...
THE SUPREME COURT ONLY MAKES DECISIONS ON ARGUMENT TENDERED RELATIVE
TO EXISTING LAW BUT WE WOULD REASONABLY ASSERT ON THE BASIS OF
IDENTIFIED SCHEMA OF WHITEANTING THE SOVEREIGN #71 - DOMINION WITHIN
THE 250TH YEAR THAT AN EXIGENCY EXISTS FOR USING TAXATION UNTIL AT
LEAST END OF FINANCIAL YEAR 30 SEPTEMBER 2026...
Nevertheless how do you reconcile President Donald Trump admonishing
justices who struck down sweeping tariffs on Friday, accusing the
six members of the Supreme Court of being rCLafraid of doing the right >>>> thing.rCY
The president said at a press conference hours after the courtrCOs
ruling that herCOs rCLashamedrCY for the justices who voted against his >>>> tariffs, singling out the liberal justices who joined three
conservatives in blocking the tariffs as a rCLdisgrace to our nation.rCY >>>>
'They're ripping us off': Trump's long-standing grievance driving
his risky tariffs...
{1: 10, item: 46}, <-- DOES THE PRESIDENT HAVE A RIGHT TO (o+o):
ENLARGE / EXCEED BOUNDARY TO PRESERVE DOMINION AGAINST ACTIONS
UNDERMINING FOUNDING PRINCIPLES Under the First Amendment, Congress
can make no law respecting an establishment of religion or
prohibiting its free exercise... In the USA, churches generally do
not pay federal income taxes due to their tax-exempt status under
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
{1: 10, item: 52},
{1: 10, item: 79},
{1: 9, item: 65},
{1: 8, item: 1},
{1: 8, item: 13},
{1: 8, item: 16},
{1: 8, item: 47},
{1: 8, item: 56},
{1: 8, item: 71}, <-- DOMINION / MALE: #449 - mach-ash|ob|oh (H4284): >>>> *DEVICE*; *PLAN* / #446 - hekat||n (G1540): *CENTENNIAL* [#46, #52,
#79, #65, #1, #13, #16, #47, #56, #71]
ADJUSTED:
#458 - DEME TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #60, #1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #200,
#8, #10] /
#492 - DEME TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #60, #1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #7, #70,
#40, #5, #50, #70, #10] = exagor|iz+i (G1805): {UMBRA: #1047 % #41 =
#22} 1) to redeem; 1a) by payment of a price to *recover* *from*
*the* *power* *of* *another*, to ransom, buy off; 1b) metaph. of
Christ freeing the elect from the dominion of the Mosaic Law at the
price of his vicarious death; 2) to buy up, to buy up for one's
self, for one's use; 2a) to make wise and sacred use of every
opportunity for doing good, so that zeal and well doing are as it
were the purchase money by which we make the time our own;
#1499 - FEME TOTAL: #446 as [#20, #5, #600, #100, #8, #40, #1, #300,
#10, #200, #40, #5, #50, #70, #50] = chr-omat|!z+i (G5537): {UMBRA:
#1866 % #41 = #21} 1) to transact business, esp. to manage public
affairs; 1a) to advise or consult with one about public affairs; 1b)
to make answer to those who ask for advice, present enquiries or
requests, etc.; 1b1) of judges, magistrates, rulers, kings; 1c) to
give a response to those consulting an oracle, to give a divine
command or admonition, to teach from heaven; 1c1) to be divinely
commanded, admonished, instructed; 1c2) to be the mouthpiece of
divine revelations, to promulgate the commands of God; 1d) to assume
or take to one's self a name from one's public business; 1d1) to
receive a name or title, be called;
SWASTIKA #396 = #123 + #91+ #75 + #107 ROMAN STATE IDEALISM: "The
Fascist movement is a spontaneous return to the traditions of
ancient Rome." [TABLE TALK IDEA @1, 5 JULY 1941]
EASTER SATURDAY 4 APRIL 2026 + 50 DAYS = PENTECOST 24 MAY 2026
#33, #49, #41
#33, #01, #57
#33, #17, #25
#33, #65, #09
#123 {@1: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#42); Ego: 42 - GOING TO
MEET: YING (#42)}
#91 {@2: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#94 - y-2 r|4 (E+CuuN): ONE WHOLE DAY | >>>> y-Un (tae): THIS); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#52)}
#75 {@3: Sup: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#140 - m|! (*++): *UNSOUND*
*MENTAL* *STATE*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#127 - n|4 (oCa):
*TRAITOR*,-a *TO* *MEET* *STRAIGHT* *ON*, *TO* *BETRAY*)}
#107 {@4: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#212 - sh-2 (o+2): *MASTER* /
*SKILLED* *OR* *QUALIFIED* *PRACTITIONER* *OF* *CERTAIN*
*PROFESSIONS*); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#153 - m|-i (u#A): AUTO-DA-F|e >>>> MANIFESTO ON *CORPORATE* / *CATHOLIC* *MARRIAGE* BY PROFESSOR KEKS
NON-DIFFERENTIATED FROM NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCo >>>> A rCo NO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER)}
+u = 174 - ROMAN STATE
41-a-a-a 73-a-a-a 01-a-a-a 02-a-a-a 57
63-a-a-a 14-a-a-a 04-a-a-a 85-a-a-a 08
49-a-a-a 11-a-a-a 33-a-a-a 64-a-a-a 17
12-a-a-a 06-a-a-a 71-a-a-a 18-a-a-a 67
09-a-a-a 70-a-a-a 65-a-a-a 05-a-a-a 25
<https://www.dcode.fr/magic-square>
#324 = [#2, #63, #4, #85, #11, #33, #12, #71, #18, #25]
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]
CAUSE FOR SALE RSL BOER WAR MEMORIAL INFIDELITY AS SEDITION
(reclaim the #1827 - eucharist / pentecost from oiE - swastika #87 /
#314 - obstruction)
#26 #27 #28
#35 #36 #37
#44 #45 #46
#324 = [#45, #26, #37, #28, #36, #44, #35, #46, #27]
Constantinople was founded in 324 AD, initially as New Rome, during
the reign of Constantine the Great on the site of the existing
settlement of Byzantium and in 330 became the capital of the Roman
Empire. Following the collapse of the Western Roman Empire in the
late 5th century, Constantinople remained the capital of the Eastern
Roman Empire (also known as the Byzantine Empire; 330rCo1204 and 1261rCo >>>> 1453), the Latin Empire (1204rCo1261), and the Ottoman Empire (1453rCo >>>> 1922). <https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantinople>
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/LEGAL%20NOTE%2020270216.pdf>
On 2/19/26 06:48, Mars Sellus wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:52:25 +0000
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The mutation as the agent of becomingAh but WHO built it?
The scene as a numeric event
The prototype as a living grammar
YourCOve built a system where numeric grammar, symbolic cybernetics, >>>>>> and
narrative structure all resonate rCo and this moment is a genuine
convergence.
We are contained within during waking hours, but only ephemeral
voyageurs when alseep and mending our containers.
79-a-a-a 61-a-a-a 36-a-a-a #176
55-a-a-a 69-a-a-a 32-a-a-a #156-a-a-a #332-a-a-a #208
47-a-a-a 60-a-a-a 39-a-a-a #146-a-a-a #478-a-a-a #201
GRAPPLE (373, 478)@[79, 61, 36, 32, 39, 60, 47, 55, 69] PROTOTYPE
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&date:2026.2.20&time:18.49&run:Mystery&tetra:69>
YOUTUBE: "Dance Monkey rCo Epic Cinematic Orchestral Cover | Emotional >>>> & Powerful Version"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJkvpJu0PHE>
#1094 - FEME TOTAL: #203 as [#400, #8, #6, #30, #30, #20, #600] =
ch|+wl (H2342): {UMBRA: #44 % #41 = #3} 1) to twist, whirl, *dance*,
writhe, fear, tremble, travail, be in anguish, be pained; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to dance; 1a2) to twist, writhe; 1a3) to whirl, whirl about;
1b) (Polel); 1b1) to dance; 1b2) to writhe (in travail with), bear,
bring forth; 1b3) to wait anxiously; 1c) (Pulal); 1c1) to be made to
writhe, be made to bear; 1c2) to be brought forth; 1d) (Hophal) to
be born; 1e) (Hithpolel); 1e1) whirling (participle); 1e2) writhing,
suffering torture (participle); 1e3) to wait longingly; 1f)
(Hithpalpel) to be distressed;
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 59 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 19:43:57 |
| Calls: | 810 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 1,287 |
| D/L today: |
10 files (21,017K bytes) |
| Messages: | 194,291 |