• Looks like the fuckwit judge in the death cap mushroom trial is trying to hijack the trial

    From Rod Speed@rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com to aus.legal on Fri Jun 27 09:40:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: aus.legal

    5 fucking days lecturing the jury, trying
    to get a not guilty result or a hung jury
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Peter Jason@pj@jostle.com to aus.legal on Fri Jun 27 09:50:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: aus.legal

    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 09:40:49 +1000, "Rod Speed"
    <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

    5 fucking days lecturing the jury, trying
    to get a not guilty result or a hung jury

    Motive? Does he have the hots for the defendent?

    Are judges paid by the word; like lawyers?

    Is he trying to put the town on the map?

    Is he being paid by the hour?

    Is it a grandstanding boy thing?

    Don't worry, she'll be burned at the stake.






    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rod Speed@rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com to aus.legal on Fri Jun 27 10:41:44 2025
    From Newsgroup: aus.legal

    Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
    Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

    5 fucking days lecturing the jury, trying
    to get a not guilty result or a hung jury

    Motive?

    He stupidly believes that she didnt do it deliberately
    eveb tho she has lied repeatedly about what she did

    Does he have the hots for the defendent?

    Unlikely given that they arent allowed to fuck those found not guilty

    Are judges paid by the word; like lawyers?

    Nope, they aren't paid by the hour either, they are salaried

    Is he trying to put the town on the map?

    That has already happened

    Is he being paid by the hour?

    Nope, and not by the day either

    Is it a grandstanding boy thing?

    Unlikely

    Don't worry, she'll be burned at the stake.

    We'll see,,,
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Max@max@invalid.address to aus.legal on Sat Jun 28 14:54:39 2025
    From Newsgroup: aus.legal

    On 27/06/2025 10:41 am, Rod Speed wrote:
    Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
    Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

    5 fucking days lecturing the jury, trying
    to get a not guilty result or a hung jury

    Motive?

    He stupidly believes that she didnt do it deliberately
    eveb tho she has lied repeatedly about what she did

    Does he have the hots for the defendent?

    Unlikely given that they arent allowed to fuck those found not guilty

    Are judges paid by the word; like lawyers?

    Nope, they aren't paid by the hour either, they are salaried

    Is he trying to put the town on the map?

    That has already happened

    Is he being paid by the hour?

    Nope, and not by the day either

    Is it a grandstanding boy thing?

    Unlikely

    Don't worry, she'll be burned at the stake.

    We'll see,,,

    I find it surprising that the lesser charge of manslaughter has not been talked about in this case.

    It's just a all-or-nothing murder charge.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rod Speed@rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com to aus.legal on Sat Jun 28 16:20:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: aus.legal

    Max <max@invalid.address> wrote
    Rod Speed wrote
    Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
    Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

    5 fucking days lecturing the jury, trying
    to get a not guilty result or a hung jury

    Motive?

    He stupidly believes that she didnt do it deliberately
    eveb tho she has lied repeatedly about what she did

    Does he have the hots for the defendent?

    Unlikely given that they arent allowed to fuck those found not guilty

    Are judges paid by the word; like lawyers?

    Nope, they aren't paid by the hour either, they are salaried

    Is he trying to put the town on the map?

    That has already happened

    Is he being paid by the hour?

    Nope, and not by the day either

    Is it a grandstanding boy thing?

    Unlikely

    Don't worry, she'll be burned at the stake.

    We'll see,,,

    I find it surprising that the lesser charge of manslaughterhas not been talked about in this case.

    Of course it has in the trial, claiming that it was an accident

    It's just a all-or-nothing murder charge.

    Wrong

    And that fuckwit judge proclaimed on friday that the
    jury should not find her guilty just because she lied.

    Of course criminals lie and that is evidence that they
    did the crime because otherwise there would be no
    need to lie, fuckwit judge.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2